This is a confusing title, but "record of the year" means song, while Beatles, Bob Dylan, and the Rolling Stones were usually credited with album awards. This is also the American list, so its very partial to soft rock and easy listening.
@@firstmategiddyRecord of the Year is what it’s officially called, they also do Song of the Year but that’s a different category. I explain it more in the description.
Roger Taylor (Drummer of Queen) at his speech 2001 for Queen being inducted at Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame " this is certainly a big big up actually more than all the Grammys we never got".
The Grammy's is just the annual group hug for the American music industry. Seeing the winning songs from the 60s and 70's was a joke. Very proud to see how few Grammy award winning albums I own!
There were some good ones in the 60s/70s - Mrs Robinson, Bridge Over Troubled Water, Aquarius, Girl from Ipanema, Strangers in the Night, Hotel California.
@@AK-jw7rxthe beatles has like 8-10 grammys thats still alot they didn’t have alot of albums and u gotta understand only one can win in each categories the competition is hard too
Couldn’t agree more. The Grammys truly never did get it right. Like hello??? A day in the life. Strawberry fields forever. While my guitar gently weeps ??? Let it be???? Here comes the sun something??? The fact that the Beatles only won 1 Grammy for song of the year in 1965 being Michelle and only one other shows that the Grammys have to be the absolute most wrong and stupid prestige’s award to ever exist even worse than the Oscar’s 😒
At least with Best Picture, the Oscars mostly pick the 2nd or 3rd best option instead of the 1st, and usually you recognize the movie years later. When I tell you there’s albums from just 10 years ago that I don’t recognize that won Album of the Year instead of much better and longer lasting albums. Like they’ve had a horrible run in the 2020’s.
And it was a HUGE shift when "The Establishment" (music industry, TV) finally switched from Middle of the Road to Rock. And it didn't happen until almost the mid-70s - kinda illustrates what the 60s were really about and how out-of-touch Establishment America really was during this time waiting for the corporate types to catch up with actual people in America.
It's interesting that the first Grammy winner was an Italian song (it won the Sanremo music festival in 1958 and then came 3rd in the Eurovision Song Contest).
The only picks from this list that I also probably would've chosen were Hotel California, Beat It, Clocks, and Get Lucky. Other than that, there were SO many songs that deserved to be on here
I would say tears in heaven definitely deserved to be there but there were some great songs from that year that I would say could and should have won the award.
These judges were so far behind the times. Reminds me of my old man, an avid listener of music and former critic... who mostly stopped following the trends in the mid 70's. He would still be giving Bob Dylan and Tom Petty album of the year awards if he were the judge
@@przemekgrabowski Seriously? I did not know that. I like his earliest work. It was like pallet cleanser, something clean and pure for those who did not like the bloated 70' progg/metal or thevraw punk
There are no judges, NARAS members all get to vote for every category. All of the artists also have to join NARAS to be Entered into the awards competition, so artists are actually voting for each other, or themselves when it's an award they are up for.
I didn't read all the comments, but nice job with this. These are the actual Grammy winning Record of the Year winners, not the opinion of the creator of the video. We can all disagree, but it's fact - the were the winners of each year.
Seems like everyone had that Herb Alpert album when I was a kid. Either that, or it just stood out in the mind of a young boy for whatever reason. I do love whipped cream
Like do a research before u type something stop making yourself look stupid. If someone doesn’t win find who were the competitors and how many Grammys he has won in his career. You want the grammys the most prestigious music award to just hand out 100 in each categories?
🎉 Retro music greetings from coastal Mississippi. This is a very nice video. Brings back alot of memories . Especially the 70/80 decade. I still have my vinyl, cassette and cds😂
Never forget how bad michael jackson got snubbed at the 1988 grammys. He never won grammys like he deserved after 1984. Not even many for dangerous or bad album. He also got nominated rarely, same with AMAs and VMAs. Still he has the most AMAs and is on the list for most grammys. MTV also named an award after him but are gradually detaching his name from it. Sick how america treated michael after 1985.
Pretty wild to look back at this. Rarely do the Grammy's get it right. If I was ranking my Top 5 all time record of the year winners, I'd go with 1. The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face - Roberta Flack, 2. Hotel California - The Eagles, 3. Clocks - Coldplay, 4. Just the Way You Are - Billy Joel, Strangers in the Night - Frank Sinatra. All 10/10 songs in my book. Crazy that the Beatles never won.
They won a few Grammy awards: • Best New Artist, 1965 • Best Performance by a Vocal Group: A Hard Day’s Night, 1965 • The Song of the Year: Michelle, 1966 • Best Contemporary Album: Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, 1968 • Album of the Year: Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, 1968 • Abbey Road won a Grammy for Best Engineered Non-Classical Recording, 1970
*Good morning.* *This list is correct!* *Grammy Award for RECORD of the Year.* *Don't confuse with Song of the Year, that is another of the awards, another statuette.* *Because the 1967 GRAMMY Awards SONG OF THE YEAR was MICHELLE by THE BEATLES !*
Like that’s supposed to change anything, they were still snubbed for most of their careers and in total won less than half a dozen. It took SGT. Pepper for The Beatles to be officially recognised by the academy
Olivia is an underrated singer and an angel of a human being. Great to see her among a short list of 65 or so albums of the year. Everyone keeps complaining about judges or people picking the winners. FYI, There are no judges or panel picking these winners. NARAS members, which includes the artists themselves get to vote for everything. That's how the winners are decided.
@@joex9865Music is just as good as its ever been man. Lots of differents things out there. You dont have to like ever artist or genre. Thats the beauty of music. Just because you dont like the most popular song of the year doesnt mean music is bad. It means its changed. Try not to be such a cramudgen, enjoy things.
Enquanto eu via o video, especificamente parte do anos 60 nas musicas dessa minutagem 0:270:11 e 0:17 eu sentia um tipo de nostalgia ou algo do tipo sendo que eu nem existia nessa época, enquanto eu ouvia era como se eu tivesse nessa época ou vivido nessa época
It’s like they just pick the wimpiest song that comes out. The most rocking song on here was “Beat It” by Michael Jackson of all people! I know critics really hated the great bands in their era, but god damn this is shameful. No Beatles, Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, Queen, Pink Floyd, etc. The most irksome was Captain & Tennille winning. Can’t do anything about modern day music, but the late ‘60 through ‘70s was stacked and they give it to the sappiest songs. I wasn’t alive then, but I know it’s greatness.
That's why people reviewing, ranking and/or enjoying artists shouldn't get his opinions based on charts and/or awards. They only reflect popularity, which most times than not doesn't reflect quality
See how the song quality dropped somewhere in the 2000s and the industry became the POP industry. Madonna never won a single grammy for record of the year! Todays pop industry is all thanks to Madonna and Michael Jackson.
Flowers winning ROTY this year was a bit disappointing, it just sounds like a generic radio pop song when there was better and more unique songs out there.
I Love Tom Jobim's Songs, i love Bossa Nova, i love Brazilian Culture, Brazil, Rich center os western culture, without Discrediting other coutriers🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
1963 - I wanna hold your hand 1964 - A hard day's night 1965 - Yesterday 1966 - Eleanor Rigby 1967 - A day in the life 1968 - Hey Jude 1969 - Something 1970 - Let it Be. Este Prêmio Grammy é um LIXO!!!
The Grammys are obviously ridiculous, but the most amazing accomplishment here is that the great Hal Blaine played drums on six consecutive (1966-71) winners. One of his many distinctions that will never be surpassed.
Billie Eilish is the most Overrated artist ever. 5:37 & 5:43. She doesn’t sing, she Mumbles her words. This whole record of the year is a bunch of artsy-fartsy BS. It appears they just try to pick the most Avangard so I’m just a pretend that they’re “cool and hip”, & anyone else that doesn’t like it “just doesn’t understand music” she wins two years in a row on the song that’s completely Mumbles and then she wins the 2024 ask her for another song she just Mumbles.
After reading the description, I'm more confused than before. What's the criteria in electing a "record of the year"? You explained that "Song of the year" was made from a songwriting point of view. Which is totally fair and actually understandable Then what is this?
Think of it as all that you hear outside the actual lyrics and melody. Two different ppl could record the same song but all the things that separate them: the instruments, the singer, the balance (mix) of the instruments and the voice, all these things make up the record of the year.
I read your description of the difference between a “record” of the year, and “song” of the year. I know this is coming from the Grammys, but is really asinine. What would make something win one versus the other? Out all the GREAT songs since 1959. It’s amazing barely any of the GREAT songs have ever won this category.
for record, i'd imagine it's a combination of the production, arrangement, mixing, and the artist's performance. whereas song of the year would be more focused on the songwriting (melody, lyrics, maybe a combination of the 2)
@@elliotanders2363 Thanks for your reply. I read your comment 3 times now. & I’m even more confused on the difference between “record” of the year, & “song” of the year. & still amazed that all these “record” of the year, the won in this video. And so many of the great songs I’ve never won. If it’s based on the criteria, you explain then and what the TH-cam creator is a difference. Then “Lucy in the sky with Diamonds” and/or “A Day in the Life” I should’ve of definitely won “Record” of the year.
@@MikeCee7 Yeah I'm not sure how or why voters make their decision. But they say "Song of the Year" is a songwriters award, and "Record of the Year" I'm guessing is based on the actual recording of the song.
@@elliotanders2363 Thanks, Either way, I’m just Super Amazed & Shocked at all the great songs in the past, that never won. And all the many someone lame songs in this video that won “record” of the year.
Dont know why is jazz pop. Clocks is pop rock/piano rock. Somebody That I Used to Know is art pop. 24K Magic is synth-funk. This Is America is trap and conscious rap.
Bob Dylan, the Rolling Stones, The Beatles. These bands and artists had a huge impact and obviously accumulated tons of awards. Meanwhile, Taylor Swift wins Grammy's right, left, and centre.
As far as I know song of the year is the award for the lyrics and record of the year is the award for the actual song as you hear it and then there’s album of the year and this is what the Grammys web page says about the award “Award to Artist(s) and to Featured Artist(s), Songwriter(s) of new material, Producer(s), Recording Engineer(s), Mixer(s) and Mastering Engineer(s) credited with 20% or more playing time of the album.”
Proving they completely missed Rock n roll, The Beach Boys, Dylan, the Beatles, the great rock music of the late 60s, CCR, Bee Gees, Blondie, Heavy Metal, but got Captain and Tennille, Kim Carnes, lots of really tame ballads, one hit wonders, etc. …!
When you consider that the 70s were the most dominant time for Rock, it’s amazing only 1 song won. Rock faced severe challenges from the suits at every turn.
They skipped whole genres, always 15 years lagging in the development of music. Simon and Garfunkel winning so many times? What's Grammy, a private party for a group of 30?
No Dylan, no Beatles, no Stones. And Phil Collins didn't get a single win in the 80s? Geez
This is a confusing title, but "record of the year" means song, while Beatles, Bob Dylan, and the Rolling Stones were usually credited with album awards. This is also the American list, so its very partial to soft rock and easy listening.
Beatles 80's?
@@firstmategiddyRecord of the Year is what it’s officially called, they also do Song of the Year but that’s a different category. I explain it more in the description.
@@TheManInMeOfficial Sorry, I should probably specify I mean the title of the award is confusing, not your video name.
@@firstmategiddyAh, I see. Yeah, definitely a poor title.
Roger Taylor (Drummer of Queen) at his speech 2001 for Queen being inducted at Rock'n Roll Hall of Fame " this is certainly a big big up actually more than all the Grammys we never got".
Grammys don't take anything away from bands being legends. Bohemian Rhapsody movie put all these awards to shame.
Was surprised Queen wasn't in this tbh
@@robloxplayer1605 None of the great 60s/70s rock bands were.
The Grammy's is just the annual group hug for the American music industry. Seeing the winning songs from the 60s and 70's was a joke. Very proud to see how few Grammy award winning albums I own!
There were some good ones in the 60s/70s - Mrs Robinson, Bridge Over Troubled Water, Aquarius, Girl from Ipanema, Strangers in the Night, Hotel California.
Weird statement but ok
Only half the boast you actually think this is bud 😂
Me when i want to be annoying
2020
They really liked the ballads
The Grammys did NOT cook with these picks 💀
Especially 2024 but some of the song were good
Not one Beatles album in the 60s?.or Elvis?
That Stan gets album was valid tho
@@AK-jw7rxthe beatles has like 8-10 grammys thats still alot they didn’t have alot of albums and u gotta understand only one can win in each categories the competition is hard too
2014 is absolutely deserved
Never paid much attention to the Grammys. It’s like the Oscars they almost never get it right.
Couldn’t agree more. The Grammys truly never did get it right. Like hello??? A day in the life. Strawberry fields forever. While my guitar gently weeps ??? Let it be???? Here comes the sun something??? The fact that the Beatles only won 1 Grammy for song of the year in 1965 being Michelle and only one other shows that the Grammys have to be the absolute most wrong and stupid prestige’s award to ever exist even worse than the Oscar’s 😒
I’d say The Grammys are the most egregious of the major awards. They seem the most consistently disconnected.
@@TheManInMeOfficial u a Beatles fan?
At least with Best Picture, the Oscars mostly pick the 2nd or 3rd best option instead of the 1st, and usually you recognize the movie years later. When I tell you there’s albums from just 10 years ago that I don’t recognize that won Album of the Year instead of much better and longer lasting albums. Like they’ve had a horrible run in the 2020’s.
@@ZacV47 although I agree with the awful picks for the 2020’s you kind of contradicted yourself saying the most recent ones are awful
lol, first rock song winner is a Hotel California
Rubbishhhhhhh
Yeah no, 1968, you just wanted riffs and solos in a 3 second clip
Rock was always kind if not anti establishment, but 'alternative' music direction. Until it became "classic" rock 30 years later
@@Blisterynso rubbish
And it was a HUGE shift when "The Establishment" (music industry, TV) finally switched from Middle of the Road to Rock. And it didn't happen until almost the mid-70s - kinda illustrates what the 60s were really about and how out-of-touch Establishment America really was during this time waiting for the corporate types to catch up with actual people in America.
It's interesting that the first Grammy winner was an Italian song (it won the Sanremo music festival in 1958 and then came 3rd in the Eurovision Song Contest).
The best song ever at Eurovision imo, Bowie's cover is also amazing
Telex - eurovision
Listen to the Gipsy Kings version
The only picks from this list that I also probably would've chosen were Hotel California, Beat It, Clocks, and Get Lucky. Other than that, there were SO many songs that deserved to be on here
I would argue that both silk sonic and uptown funk were the songs of those years. We Are the World and I Will Always Love You deserve all the awards.
cough cough beatles cough cough
I would say tears in heaven definitely deserved to be there but there were some great songs from that year that I would say could and should have won the award.
@@stuff8093yeah tear in heaven is the most beautiful song(my opinion)
Volare
Kiss From A Rose - Seal, my personal favourite 👍
2 songs from the same album for U2 was ridiculous
Not as ridiculous as seeing Billie Eilish in the list (twice!).
I dont get the hate for Billie, shes a genuinely good artist imo, amazing vocals. This is coming from a rap and hip-hop listener@rupiter2008
What is actually ridiculous is your comment.
@@sampietroj No more ridiculous than you defending U2 lol its 2024
@@f1ndGeo. you know what is better than autotune. Autotune with generative AI
These judges were so far behind the times.
Reminds me of my old man, an avid listener of music and former critic... who mostly stopped following the trends in the mid 70's.
He would still be giving Bob Dylan and Tom Petty album of the year awards if he were the judge
Would he notice that Tom Petty has passed?
Good time to tune out tbh
@@przemekgrabowski
Seriously?
I did not know that.
I like his earliest work. It was like pallet cleanser, something clean and pure for those who did not like the bloated 70' progg/metal or thevraw punk
There are no judges, NARAS members all get to vote for every category. All of the artists also have to join NARAS to be Entered into the awards competition, so artists are actually voting for each other, or themselves when it's an award they are up for.
They gave nothing to Led Zeppelin in their prime, then gave best record to Robert Plant in 2009 for a song no one's heard of.
How can there be no Beatles!?
The establishment were biased against them ig
Grammy 1965 - Best New Artist
Grammy 1967 - Michelle - Song of The Year
Grammy 1968 - Album of Year - Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band
@@rafaelnascimento9181No, it was a cover song.
Good question
They won in other categories calm down
I didn't read all the comments, but nice job with this. These are the actual Grammy winning Record of the Year winners, not the opinion of the creator of the video. We can all disagree, but it's fact - the were the winners of each year.
Seems like everyone had that Herb Alpert album when I was a kid. Either that, or it just stood out in the mind of a young boy for whatever reason. I do love whipped cream
My parents had it or maybe it was my grandparents. Either way, I was taught all the good music, from Sinatra to acid rock, typical GenX experience.
2008 Amy Winehouse grammy in my heart for ever❤
No late 60’s Beatles records is crazy. Considering how revolutionary those albums were. Sgt Pepper specifically.
Ah yes, everyone favourite late 60's group: The 5th Dimension
Like do a research before u type something stop making yourself look stupid. If someone doesn’t win find who were the competitors and how many Grammys he has won in his career. You want the grammys the most prestigious music award to just hand out 100 in each categories?
1978 no Bee Gees Grammy and no Oscar - LOL the biggest joke in music history 😂😂😂
🎉 Retro music greetings from coastal Mississippi. This is a very nice video. Brings back alot of memories . Especially the 70/80 decade. I still have my vinyl, cassette and cds😂
It was around the mid nineties where this list started to genuinely piss me off
0:56 não sabia que uma das minhas musicas favoritas, Mrs Robinson, era tbm Pop, pensava que só era Folk
são ambos
It was like the sixties never happened. No Beatles, Stones, Beach Boys or Bob Dylan. All easy listening and jazz.
Girl from Ipanema is fire though
And Mrs. Robinson.
5:55 Lizzo did not deserve any success.
Never forget how bad michael jackson got snubbed at the 1988 grammys. He never won grammys like he deserved after 1984. Not even many for dangerous or bad album. He also got nominated rarely, same with AMAs and VMAs. Still he has the most AMAs and is on the list for most grammys. MTV also named an award after him but are gradually detaching his name from it. Sick how america treated michael after 1985.
Domenico Modugno didn't win Eurovision but he won a grammy lmao
Pretty wild to look back at this. Rarely do the Grammy's get it right. If I was ranking my Top 5 all time record of the year winners, I'd go with 1. The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face - Roberta Flack, 2. Hotel California - The Eagles, 3. Clocks - Coldplay, 4. Just the Way You Are - Billy Joel, Strangers in the Night - Frank Sinatra. All 10/10 songs in my book. Crazy that the Beatles never won.
They won a few Grammy awards:
• Best New Artist, 1965
• Best Performance by a Vocal Group: A Hard Day’s Night, 1965
• The Song of the Year: Michelle, 1966
• Best Contemporary Album: Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, 1968
• Album of the Year: Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, 1968
• Abbey Road won a Grammy for Best Engineered Non-Classical Recording, 1970
"Album of the Year" is the biggest category at the Grammys and TheBeatles won - Sergeant Pepper's
Same people that gave Milli Vanilli an award, and snubbed Metallica to give Jethro Tull the metal award.
*Good morning.*
*This list is correct!*
*Grammy Award for RECORD of the Year.*
*Don't confuse with Song of the Year, that is another of the awards, another statuette.*
*Because the 1967 GRAMMY Awards SONG OF THE YEAR was MICHELLE by THE BEATLES !*
Like that’s supposed to change anything, they were still snubbed for most of their careers and in total won less than half a dozen. It took SGT. Pepper for The Beatles to be officially recognised by the academy
@@TheLachsta I wonder how many people older than 30 were actually listening to Beatles in the 60-s ....
michelle was made in 1965 so that doesnt make any sense but also u literally have a beatles pfp so how are u suddenly against them
Olivia is an underrated singer and an angel of a human being. Great to see her among a short list of 65 or so albums of the year. Everyone keeps complaining about judges or people picking the winners. FYI, There are no judges or panel picking these winners. NARAS members, which includes the artists themselves get to vote for everything. That's how the winners are decided.
This is like the rock and roll hall of SHAME.
That was lazy & unfunny
What are you 17 or 60-something? The only ages I can think of stupid enough to act this way
We always complain that the music nowadays is horrible, but take this list and see that there's still good music been made...
There are so many great singers
1994: Whitney Houston
2023: Lizzo
🙃
yup we can read!
I think the point is, it's time to make music great again
@@joex9865Music is just as good as its ever been man. Lots of differents things out there. You dont have to like ever artist or genre. Thats the beauty of music.
Just because you dont like the most popular song of the year doesnt mean music is bad. It means its changed. Try not to be such a cramudgen, enjoy things.
@@Me-ui1zyyou on drugs? Music is substantially worse now. There is still SOME good stuff but nowhere near as good as it used to be.
5 choices is correct
Other is totally uncorrect
There is no “correct”
@@Xxrocknrollgodwell Lizzo is definitely incorrect
Enquanto eu via o video, especificamente parte do anos 60 nas musicas dessa minutagem 0:27 0:11 e 0:17 eu sentia um tipo de nostalgia ou algo do tipo sendo que eu nem existia nessa época, enquanto eu ouvia era como se eu tivesse nessa época ou vivido nessa época
At least they started choosing artists people actually listened to for the 2010s
The Grammys needs new judges or criteria on picking the song of the year. Only a few are deserving, and many were left out.
1965 is Stan Getz and JOAO Gilberto, not Astrud. Astrud was the wife of Joao Gilberto, she only sing in some featurings
It’s like they just pick the wimpiest song that comes out. The most rocking song on here was “Beat It” by Michael Jackson of all people! I know critics really hated the great bands in their era, but god damn this is shameful. No Beatles, Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, Queen, Pink Floyd, etc. The most irksome was Captain & Tennille winning. Can’t do anything about modern day music, but the late ‘60 through ‘70s was stacked and they give it to the sappiest songs. I wasn’t alive then, but I know it’s greatness.
That's why people reviewing, ranking and/or enjoying artists shouldn't get his opinions based on charts and/or awards.
They only reflect popularity, which most times than not doesn't reflect quality
See how the song quality dropped somewhere in the 2000s and the industry became the POP industry. Madonna never won a single grammy for record of the year! Todays pop industry is all thanks to Madonna and Michael Jackson.
Grammys - run by the same people who chose the artists for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
Flowers winning ROTY this year was a bit disappointing, it just sounds like a generic radio pop song when there was better and more unique songs out there.
Fr
Interesting. Because i really like flowers
I'm not very familiar with current music..or anything after the 1980s lol..but I thought that was a Bruno Mars song.
@@conniebauer4128 I think it’s shares similar lyrics because I thought that too
@@conniebauer4128it shares the same chords and apparently it was made that way because it was an "homage"
What I gathered from just the first 10 years was the academy held onto the traditional 50’s poppy sound until Simon and Garfunkel said “Joe DiMaggio”
Actually The 5th dimension changed it
I mean you talk about bands that changed music the most, The Beatles, Pink Floyd, Black Sabbath, how are none of them on here?! It's ridiculous!
Music evolved Backwards at 2020
the last 7 except Flowers I had never heard or heard of before watching this. I must be old now
Flowers is the best song of 2023
@@natymurillo2802there’s hundreds of better songs that were released last year
I am 62 and the only one I never heard off the entire list was Shawn Colvin. So age is not an excuse. 😊
Check out Silk Sonic, they're pretty great actually
It's essentially a superduo of Bruno Mars and Anderson .Paak
I have got the original version of I will always love you by Dolly Parton who also wrote it.
Good songs 👍
The cut for both Moon River and The Days of Wine and Roses are not the singles by Henry Mancini that won for record of the year. Kindly rectify this.
I noticed this right away too as I was around during the time and presently still have the correct 45s.
I suspect there were copyright issues, but even so a disclaimer would have been appropriate.
Get Lucky stayed on repeat when it first came out 😂
Very interesting. Many thanks 📯
I Love Tom Jobim's Songs, i love Bossa Nova, i love Brazilian Culture, Brazil, Rich center os western culture, without Discrediting other coutriers🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
1963 - I wanna hold your hand
1964 - A hard day's night
1965 - Yesterday
1966 - Eleanor Rigby
1967 - A day in the life
1968 - Hey Jude
1969 - Something
1970 - Let it Be.
Este Prêmio Grammy é um LIXO!!!
Sorry, I think the academy got it right.
@@chiaralistica No
@@chiaralistica world's worst take
@@chiaralisticaVocê é surdo...
Considering how lame (the majority of) the winners are, I'd be insultes to win a Grammy.
1996??? 3:24 “Kiss from a Rose” by Seal, came out the summer of 1994.
It was re-released in 1995.
I've never said "Yecch" that many times in a six minute span.
Prince should take the Grammy for Sign o the times 1987
The 2000-2009 decade had some good picks
My aunt hated Celine Dion so much it had me hollering laughing.
The Grammys are obviously ridiculous, but the most amazing accomplishment here is that the great Hal Blaine played drums on six consecutive (1966-71) winners. One of his many distinctions that will never be surpassed.
Billie Eilish is the most Overrated artist ever. 5:37 & 5:43. She doesn’t sing, she Mumbles her words. This whole record of the year is a bunch of artsy-fartsy BS. It appears they just try to pick the most Avangard so I’m just a pretend that they’re “cool and hip”, & anyone else that doesn’t like it “just doesn’t understand music” she wins two years in a row on the song that’s completely Mumbles and then she wins the 2024 ask her for another song she just Mumbles.
Hotel California,Rosanna,Beat It,Another Day In Paradise e Tears in Heaven tem algumas outras poucas mas de destaque e sagradas são essas.
2009...2014 - OneRepublic...
1:57❤
0:56 ❤
3:57 ❤
So many beautiful songs.
4ra ke events Finch ke saath aur bhi dhamakedar ho gaye hain, can’t wait to join in
1:45 Beat nominees that included "Evergreen" by Barbra Streisand and "You Light Up My Life" by Debby Boone.
After reading the description, I'm more confused than before.
What's the criteria in electing a "record of the year"? You explained that "Song of the year" was made from a songwriting point of view. Which is totally fair and actually understandable
Then what is this?
Record of the year goes to the actual performers.
@@pikespice performers, producers, i think maybe even the sound engineers? but i'm not sure on that.
Think of it as all that you hear outside the actual lyrics and melody. Two different ppl could record the same song but all the things that separate them: the instruments, the singer, the balance (mix) of the instruments and the voice, all these things make up the record of the year.
You gonna do Song of the Year next?
What was I made for - Billie eilish wins soty on 2024 Grammys
4RA pe games aur events ka maza hi alag hai, dost ki recommendation pe khela tha pehli baar
Damn that was a very quick escalation between 2022 to 2023
Not a single dry eye 31 years ago as that is every parent’s biggest fear and heartbreak.
Bhai ne 4ra ke baare me bataya tha, interface bohot easy aur user-friendly hai
Yaar Aaron Finch ka 4rabet pe aana bohot badiya baat hai, ab aur confidence se bet karenge
Mack the Knife was the first record I ever got.
I read your description of the difference between a “record” of the year, and “song” of the year. I know this is coming from the Grammys, but is really asinine. What would make something win one versus the other? Out all the GREAT songs since 1959. It’s amazing barely any of the GREAT songs have ever won this category.
for record, i'd imagine it's a combination of the production, arrangement, mixing, and the artist's performance. whereas song of the year would be more focused on the songwriting (melody, lyrics, maybe a combination of the 2)
@@elliotanders2363 Thanks for your reply. I read your comment 3 times now. & I’m even more confused on the difference between “record” of the year, & “song” of the year. & still amazed that all these “record” of the year, the won in this video. And so many of the great songs I’ve never won. If it’s based on the criteria, you explain then and what the TH-cam creator is a difference. Then “Lucy in the sky with Diamonds” and/or “A Day in the Life” I should’ve of definitely won “Record” of the year.
@@MikeCee7 Yeah I'm not sure how or why voters make their decision. But they say "Song of the Year" is a songwriters award, and "Record of the Year" I'm guessing is based on the actual recording of the song.
@@elliotanders2363 Thanks, Either way, I’m just Super Amazed & Shocked at all the great songs in the past, that never won. And all the many someone lame songs in this video that won “record” of the year.
The prestige of an award can be gauged by those who have won it in the past...er, enough said...
Evidence that the Grammys have never held a barometer on the musical landscape.
(What's The Story) Morning Glory? should have definitely got the Grammy for 1995
Whitney ❤
4RA ka interface aur Finch ka participation, dono milke events ko next level pe le gaye hai
4:20
Dont know why is jazz pop.
Clocks is pop rock/piano rock.
Somebody That I Used to Know is art pop.
24K Magic is synth-funk.
This Is America is trap and conscious rap.
Beautiful day by U2 was my favorite song of all time!
Bob Dylan, the Rolling Stones, The Beatles. These bands and artists had a huge impact and obviously accumulated tons of awards. Meanwhile, Taylor Swift wins Grammy's right, left, and centre.
"I honestly love you" in 1975 winning over "The Way We Were" is a travesty
nah, Olivia nailed it, Babs best was Woman in Love
It really isn't
The Way We Were was from 74.
As far as I know song of the year is the award for the lyrics and record of the year is the award for the actual song as you hear it and then there’s album of the year and this is what the Grammys web page says about the award “Award to Artist(s) and to Featured Artist(s), Songwriter(s) of new material, Producer(s), Recording Engineer(s), Mixer(s) and Mastering Engineer(s) credited with 20% or more playing time of the album.”
Song of the year is for the writer of the song; record of the year is for the artist and producer .
Mujhe 4RA ke events pehle bhi pasand the, ab Finch ke saath aur bhi maza aayega
Bhai Aaron Finch ke 4ra ambassador banne se pura 4ra experience hi badal gaya hai
Proving they completely missed Rock n roll, The Beach Boys, Dylan, the Beatles, the great rock music of the late 60s, CCR, Bee Gees, Blondie, Heavy Metal, but got Captain and Tennille, Kim Carnes, lots of really tame ballads, one hit wonders, etc. …!
"great"
Toto IV having Rosanna totally deserved it
When you consider that the 70s were the most dominant time for Rock, it’s amazing only 1 song won. Rock faced severe challenges from the suits at every turn.
4rabet ke events hamesha se amazing the, Finch ke saath ab aur bhi awesome ho gaye hai
They skipped whole genres, always 15 years lagging in the development of music. Simon and Garfunkel winning so many times? What's Grammy, a private party for a group of 30?
Flowers wasnt as good as some of its comp but damn it I'm happy Miley got a win under her belt
Flowers is shit
Interesting that no traditional hip hop recordings. Im surprised with how many of the pre-1970 songs I've heard.
I really wish 2008 reconsider her decision and went, her musical gift is truly missed imagine the collaborations.
Finch ke saath 4RA ka experience aur bhi zabardast ho gaya hai, full paisa vasool
No Record of the Year for The Beatles. It's dramatical. Criminal.
3:19 people who remember Sheryl know how she wasn't keeping her note on the Bad world Tour. Grammys are weird
I don’t think live performances factor into how they choose stuff