Visit www.pokertrainingreviews.net for a full review of PokerNews Strategy -the new poker training site featuring pros such as Nanonoko, Genius28 and Tony G
***** there's not many chips left because the pot is so inflated to make a hand actually look like a bluff. technically all of his bets on the river will always be all-in
nanonoko Does the fact that you would have been all in on the flop with the draw make it easier to call at the end? I mean if he had you beat you would have missed the draw anyway...why not call for the times he has a hand like 7/8 diamonds?(hopefully not 6/8 diamonds lol) and complete air of course
Adam Youdell it would be more of the fact that he should be all-in on the flop if he has a value hand that makes it easier and usually should see miss diamonds like you said. I expect 68 of diamonds to check w/ the marginal showdown value he has and not bluff shove it
@BCObozeman He's using a Heads Up Display. it shows him the statistics of his opponents. It's basically free information to use against your opponents when multi-tabling.
@nanonoko One quick question Randy. What's your opinion of the hyper turbo formats for heads up sng's? Do you think it's possible to be steadily profitable or is it more like poker bingo?
I think the key thing about the hand is the river size bet. Even if he holds an A wouldnt ship it all in i think. That bet is super polarized. Only representing Qx or full house or air.
Wich Poker-Tool do u use at the Tabels? And what Informations let you show the Programm over your opponents? Would be nice if u can Answer me this. Iam play Online Poker too and want get better in this. Yours Faitfully MrDr4che
nice call and nice analysis. I think you covered every possible scenario. I think I couldn't think of all those possibilities during the hand myself but probably I would have the gut feeling that it wasn't A, Q or pocket pair by then. I wouldn't even put him on a diamond draw since even a diamond draw would play more aggressively than what he did. He was hero calling to shove all in at the end for a bluff... kinda a bizarre strategy on his part.
Then again I am a 100NL and 200NL reg, I can't really comments say Randy's raise on the flop was bad. Since he has tons of equity against anything except for AQ, QQ, or AA (which there aren't that many combos of that). A lot people would c-bet some pp on the flop to keep the lead, so he does have some folding equity. Maybe he would raise Q in this spot some % of the time to balance his raising range.
I call here all the time and lose sometimes but it feels good getting it right. Other day it went check check on K 77 on the flop. Turn was 2. check check.River was 4. Rainbow board. I checked and he bet %95 pot. Everything in my body said it was a bluff (Much easier to guess than this hand Na played), so I made the hero call with queen high knowing he had a poorly played set, pocket 4s, or nothing. I was right. He had pocket 4s.
Is it possible that most online players play as a team and communicate while playing? And is it possible that these poker websites may set you up to let you win one day and loose the other days to keep you playing? and finally set you up a good hand that you can not fold but to go all-in so you can loose all your money to like a PROP-PLAYER or like a robot player?
because of stack sizes he would have shoved an ace on the flop for protection. randy made it obvious he was drawing so if the guy had a made hand of any sort he'd certainly have just put it in on the flop when he knew he was best. it had to be air
Damn... Guys, can anybody explain me why did Randy called the all-in bet? Seriously, I don't understand: he told about puttin' that J5-guy on 55, 66, KT, KJ, AT or some shit and he called the all-in anyway without a hand. Was it a mistake or he was right? Please, explain.
@Morihay he said he puted him on small diamont draw on flop probubly... but he said if he has an ace he would shove the flop if he had a Q he shove the flop after getting reraised. if he had a small pair like 77 88 99 he would check the river he had some value once all str8 and flush draws was busted... moving all in on the river showed weakness... anyways, we didnt saw the preflop action. but anyhow wasnt a hard call with king high there... Easy Call
the thing I don't like about overanalyzing it like this is that it doesn't matter what hand you're looking at unless you take into account the history of the game before that hand. You need to bring in factors like 'is he a bluffer' 'does he play loose' etc. +another thing is I don't understand the value bet on the turn. He shoved all in on the river because he saw weakness with your check on the turn, I would put him on a weak ace but it resulted in a ridiculous bluff. Takes balls to call w/ K
@Morihay here it comes the bankroll management... if you dont have the bankroll to trust your reads by calling in this kind of hands then you ll never end up with profit... he play this stakes and he definately have the bankroll to make that call and see if he is right or not
He doesn't have KJ in his range. KJ has a lot of showdown value in this spot. Same thing with pps. Randy beats all the oop float (including FDs, JT, or J5 in this case lol). I personaly don't like Randy's raise on the flop that much (I guess he has folding equity against 88-JJ and KK, but it's so unlikely for him to raise w/ Ax, but it depends on the dynamics I guess. I think the villain would jammed Q on the flop since the flop was so wet. And A isn't in his range all that much either.
@farix28 if he had 6 or 3 he would have showdown value and would win by just checking he would stand to gain nothing by valuebetting his 6 or 3 bc nanoko would just fold or call w/ better.. his oop shove is essentially polarizing his range to the absolute nuts or complete air.. nanoko pretty much explained why he can never have a 6 or 3 too... even if he did his nuts to air ratio is so out of whack you can profitably call here and expect to see him showdown complete air the majority of the time.
He would value bet the river if he had trip queens there. Shoving doesn't make a lot of sense because shoving makes weaker aces (AT/A9, etc) fold and that's a lot of hero's range here.
@Mertt03 The time he needs to _explain_ his analysis to us has nothing to do with the time it takes him to analyze the hands while he is playing. He probably has the quickest mind of all poker players.
Something doesn't make sense... You put him on low Diamonds so maybe one of his diamonds was a 6 or a 3.. It was a risky call but am sure you just called cause you have a lot of money but you wouldn't risk it if you were short.
He's wondering if Pokerstars is a scheme and chose specific people to win and become part of the pokerstars team online to bait other people to win and then loose all of their money by continuing playing online poker
1) No, it isn't. That level of conspiracy would either yield very definitive patterns (easily tracked online) or require so much collusion as to be infeasible. 2) Possible, but unlikely. The game of poker does this automatically; all gambling games do. They introduce variance, what we call luck, which allows the worst players to win big sometimes and fool themselves into thinking they're good. Sites would risk a lot to gain very little if they rigged it even more. 3) Paranoia. See answer 2.
I played my J5 perfectly, this fish cant fold K high
Forgot I made this video/hand! Hope you guys like it! Got more videos on my channel too.
*****
there's not many chips left because the pot is so inflated to make a hand actually look like a bluff. technically all of his bets on the river will always be all-in
nanonoko Does the fact that you would have been all in on the flop with the draw make it easier to call at the end? I mean if he had you beat you would have missed the draw anyway...why not call for the times he has a hand like 7/8 diamonds?(hopefully not 6/8 diamonds lol) and complete air of course
Adam Youdell
it would be more of the fact that he should be all-in on the flop if he has a value hand that makes it easier and usually should see miss diamonds like you said. I expect 68 of diamonds to check w/ the marginal showdown value he has and not bluff shove it
amazing call wtf
Absolutely fantastic call.
its always nice to see people playing the jackpot hand
Great video!
Wow WHAT a frickin call! Good play!
@BCObozeman He's using a Heads Up Display. it shows him the statistics of his opponents. It's basically free information to use against your opponents when multi-tabling.
@nanonoko
One quick question Randy. What's your opinion of the hyper turbo formats for heads up sng's? Do you think it's possible to be steadily profitable or is it more like poker bingo?
thats right i agree that is really top shelf there is no way im watching that again
thanks man
I think the key thing about the hand is the river size bet. Even if he holds an A wouldnt ship it all in i think. That bet is super polarized. Only representing Qx or full house or air.
Wich Poker-Tool do u use at the Tabels?
And what Informations let you show the Programm over your opponents?
Would be nice if u can Answer me this. Iam play Online Poker too
and want get better in this.
Yours Faitfully
MrDr4che
whats that little button left of the dealer ? its on 3 of the 4 screens .
why does those other seats have those stats on them? what is that and what program?
thats sick stuff right there
nice call and nice analysis. I think you covered every possible scenario. I think I couldn't think of all those possibilities during the hand myself but probably I would have the gut feeling that it wasn't A, Q or pocket pair by then. I wouldn't even put him on a diamond draw since even a diamond draw would play more aggressively than what he did. He was hero calling to shove all in at the end for a bluff... kinda a bizarre strategy on his part.
can u tell me what is the name of the program that u use,that one with the numbers?
Does anybody know which program he uses to see peoples stats ? thx
what are those numbers below the player names and how do I get that too? I'm justing starting out w poker so I greatly appreciate help :)
What are those stats near the other players names? Is he using some type of program? I thought all 3rd party programs are illegal to use?
Indeed
sorry if this question has been asked, but what HUD is he using?
Then again I am a 100NL and 200NL reg, I can't really comments say Randy's raise on the flop was bad. Since he has tons of equity against anything except for AQ, QQ, or AA (which there aren't that many combos of that). A lot people would c-bet some pp on the flop to keep the lead, so he does have some folding equity. Maybe he would raise Q in this spot some % of the time to balance his raising range.
What stats do u follow in hold em manager?
@Mertt03 he still analyses the hands. He just doesn't it incredibly faster when he is 24 tabling. He is called the best in the world for a reason!
Respect
nice call
Well played, that was insane
I call here all the time and lose sometimes but it feels good getting it right. Other day it went check check on K 77 on the flop. Turn was 2. check check.River was 4. Rainbow board. I checked and he bet %95 pot. Everything in my body said it was a bluff (Much easier to guess than this hand Na played), so I made the hero call with queen high knowing he had a poorly played set, pocket 4s, or nothing. I was right. He had pocket 4s.
what are the numbers under the nicknames?
what are that numbers near your opponents?
Is it possible that most online players play as a team and communicate while playing?
And is it possible that these poker websites may set you up to let you win one day and loose the other days to keep you playing? and finally set you up a good hand that you can not fold but to go all-in so you can loose all your money to like a PROP-PLAYER or like a robot player?
which HUD stats are he using? thanks!
because of stack sizes he would have shoved an ace on the flop for protection. randy made it obvious he was drawing so if the guy had a made hand of any sort he'd certainly have just put it in on the flop when he knew he was best. it had to be air
he uses tracking programmes like holdem manager. Shows how often people 3 bet, c bet etc etc. Just extra info which most serious players use
It'd be funny if he showed KJ when you called.
Damn... Guys, can anybody explain me why did Randy called the all-in bet? Seriously, I don't understand: he told about puttin' that J5-guy on 55, 66, KT, KJ, AT or some shit and he called the all-in anyway without a hand.
Was it a mistake or he was right? Please, explain.
Nice!
sick call. he's mad!
Good read
can u explain the HUD and colours u use? Or I must subscribe? XD
that was so sweet I can see why you did it
what software does he use?
where can i get it? is it freeware? :)
y is it when i call someone's all in bet that does those exact moves, they always end up showing the nuts?? pretty sick call there nanonoko
Wouldn't he play AQ or KQ the same way?
yes it is possible... the same was as it is possible for the world to end one day... anything possible, all that matters is what you beleive in...
4:22 - LOL !
@zeejustin6 Did he say that was the reason?
what program are you using?
@Morihay he said he puted him on small diamont draw on flop probubly... but he said if he has an ace he would shove the flop if he had a Q he shove the flop after getting reraised. if he had a small pair like 77 88 99 he would check the river he had some value once all str8 and flush draws was busted... moving all in on the river showed weakness... anyways, we didnt saw the preflop action. but anyhow wasnt a hard call with king high there... Easy Call
the thing I don't like about overanalyzing it like this is that it doesn't matter what hand you're looking at unless you take into account the history of the game before that hand. You need to bring in factors like 'is he a bluffer' 'does he play loose' etc.
+another thing is I don't understand the value bet on the turn. He shoved all in on the river because he saw weakness with your check on the turn, I would put him on a weak ace but it resulted in a ridiculous bluff. Takes balls to call w/ K
or show replays
its called a heads up display just search for a pokerhud on the internet
Hahahaha the end!
Randy can stop time?
@Morihay here it comes the bankroll management... if you dont have the bankroll to trust your reads by calling in this kind of hands then you ll never end up with profit... he play this stakes and he definately have the bankroll to make that call and see if he is right or not
He doesn't have KJ in his range. KJ has a lot of showdown value in this spot. Same thing with pps. Randy beats all the oop float (including FDs, JT, or J5 in this case lol). I personaly don't like Randy's raise on the flop that much (I guess he has folding equity against 88-JJ and KK, but it's so unlikely for him to raise w/ Ax, but it depends on the dynamics I guess. I think the villain would jammed Q on the flop since the flop was so wet. And A isn't in his range all that much either.
@CoboltCurse its pokertracker's HUD
@farix28 if he had 6 or 3 he would have showdown value and would win by just checking he would stand to gain nothing by valuebetting his 6 or 3 bc nanoko would just fold or call w/ better.. his oop shove is essentially polarizing his range to the absolute nuts or complete air.. nanoko pretty much explained why he can never have a 6 or 3 too... even if he did his nuts to air ratio is so out of whack you can profitably call here and expect to see him showdown complete air the majority of the time.
cool
He would value bet the river if he had trip queens there. Shoving doesn't make a lot of sense because shoving makes weaker aces (AT/A9, etc) fold and that's a lot of hero's range here.
reppin the jackson five, no doubt.
I wonder how much he charges for coaching. I'm a live player, but I would play money to be coached by this guy for awhile.
this video show how exploiting nanonoko out of position in 3bet pot is so profitable :D
ty master;)
Triple range merge!
But I meant in low stakes
lol tony g is backing this training site i guess they have heckling seminars i admit hes the best..nano go over to bluefirepoker please
@Mertt03 The time he needs to _explain_ his analysis to us has nothing to do with the time it takes him to analyze the hands while he is playing.
He probably has the quickest mind of all poker players.
much easier to get a 7 figure bankroll when you can make those calls.
lol, the life of a pokerplayer. Look at the television just laying on the floor...
wow that was a fucking nice call :)
This is pretty amazing if you ask me... I would never put him on air here!
Something doesn't make sense... You put him on low Diamonds so maybe one of his diamonds was a 6 or a 3.. It was a risky call but am sure you just called cause you have a lot of money but you wouldn't risk it if you were short.
No... he just thinks so damn fast that it looks like time stopped to us mortal observers...
lucky call
I know this is from 2004, and I know this is Phil Hellmuth talking, but I still think it answers your question perfectly: /watch?v=mpMELRn8_l0
Much easier to make that call when you have a 7 figure bankroll..........
@xistouris
Oh, okay... Thank you for the explaining. But anyway, Randy must have iron balls to call in this situation :)
P.S. I should practice more!
you gotta call that KT diamonds always cause you had ROYALFLUSH draw !!!
much easier to bankroll 7 figures when you call those make.
Is it possible that the "Poker is Rigged" crowd will learn to use the word lose instead of loose? Or is it just a poorly programmed robot player?
@da4ite 1/20 of the 95% hands (3 outers) do lose. This has nothing to do with pokerstars
what in the hell are you talking about?
you can get it free for like a month but then it's 60 bucks i think. Maybe more
@SeriouslyWhatTheFark There's a reason why he earned that bankroll lol
hmm... so why did the..
The American accent is just beautiful isn't it. Like poetry. Um, err, err um, umerr...great play nevertheless.
Obviously 3 betting J5o is horrible in any situation lol.
Sorry internet TH-cam pro guy
i agree they would be stupid not to obsorb as much profit as possible
@farix28 he has alot of money from makin good calls, chicken and egg lol
guy high as fuck, being afraid to lose his whole bankroll on 1 hand against a robot... n shit :D
nope
He's wondering if Pokerstars is a scheme and chose specific people to win and become part of the pokerstars team online to bait other people to win and then loose all of their money by continuing playing online poker
You have to play 100k hands then you get them.
9:24 ::are u fucking kidding me?! ::
Actually he's probably repping Jackson Five. lmao
1) No, it isn't. That level of conspiracy would either yield very definitive patterns (easily tracked online) or require so much collusion as to be infeasible.
2) Possible, but unlikely. The game of poker does this automatically; all gambling games do. They introduce variance, what we call luck, which allows the worst players to win big sometimes and fool themselves into thinking they're good. Sites would risk a lot to gain very little if they rigged it even more.
3) Paranoia. See answer 2.
looked like a soul read to me. not a spewy play