Nice comparison between the format sizes. I've found when shooting it in 110 (to my preference) rating at 200 is the sweet spot. I agree some images at 400 can look a bit under exposed, but the cartridges I've rated at 100 had a bit of over exposure in the brightest areas. It's definitely scene dependent though.
@@NorbiWhitney That's an interesting thought about the Lomomatic. Aside from the flexibility in rating any cartridges, I've also figured the inspiration was partially related to the multiple exposure function and ability to half-rate 100 ISO cartridges to blend your exposure better.
One of the good things about the new Lomomatic 110 camera is that it electronically is able to adjust ISO settings, so it is easy to just switch the camera to 200 ISO (or even 100 ISO) for this film. I suspect grain should be finer as well at these lower ISO values. I generally like grain in 110 film, but on the '92 film the grain is not as pleasing as it is on other film stocks.
Thanks for the in depth comment Joh! It is indeed very interesting, and I’m sure I’ll pick it up very soon. I’ve got some expired 110 as well, which I want to overexpose.
Thank you for great and helpful video! Regarding overexposing Color 92, do you suggest just not taking away the plastic notch on the cartridges, even if your camera can handle high ISO 110 film? That would give about 2 stops overexposure.
I haven’t shot Color '92 at 100, so I’m not sure it’s a great idea without any compensation after. It shoots very well at 320 and 200 though. So maybe 100 with pull processing, could yield quite nice results.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 84 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องศึก vs เมืองไทย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kuzsAIDf1c/mqdefault.jpg)
![ไข้ขึ้นเลย! เมื่อแฝดโดนจัดเต็มวัคซีนครบ2เดือน🤒 [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.54 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z2VHItnyyvY/mqdefault.jpg)
This is super informative and well put together. You even have a dope model. Criminal it hasn't garnered more views.
@@banyan55 super appreciate that! Feel free to share it around 😉
And I’d like to say that I’ve never seen anyone to move as good as the model in this video. Stunning!
She is quite amazing, and happy to read your comment!
A great film, lots of good advice and a nice comic attitude. Love it.
Very much appreciate the kind words John.
Somehow I found this video to be the best review of lomo 92 film stock on TH-cam🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝
That’s high praise. Thank you very much !
Brilliant video! Great shots as well, not been into film to much, but looks like interesting results! Thanks for sharing!
It's definitely not for everyone, but still nice of Lomo to get it produced in different sizes for everyone who wants to try it.
Glad you enjoyed.
Nice comparison between the format sizes.
I've found when shooting it in 110 (to my preference) rating at 200 is the sweet spot. I agree some images at 400 can look a bit under exposed, but the cartridges I've rated at 100 had a bit of over exposure in the brightest areas.
It's definitely scene dependent though.
Hey thanks for the comment! Agree on all points. I wonder how much this film stock influenced exposure compensation on the Lomomatic 110.
@@NorbiWhitney That's an interesting thought about the Lomomatic. Aside from the flexibility in rating any cartridges, I've also figured the inspiration was partially related to the multiple exposure function and ability to half-rate 100 ISO cartridges to blend your exposure better.
@@filmismorefun of course! The lifeblood of Lomo is double exposures
One of the good things about the new Lomomatic 110 camera is that it electronically is able to adjust ISO settings, so it is easy to just switch the camera to 200 ISO (or even 100 ISO) for this film. I suspect grain should be finer as well at these lower ISO values. I generally like grain in 110 film, but on the '92 film the grain is not as pleasing as it is on other film stocks.
Thanks for the in depth comment Joh!
It is indeed very interesting, and I’m sure I’ll pick it up very soon. I’ve got some expired 110 as well, which I want to overexpose.
The teleport at 1:46 is gold! Love all the shots but the final shot at 5:32 was *chef's kiss* #dbateyssitwiimawby
Props to Arisa, for possibly taking my best headshots ever.
Thank you for great and helpful video! Regarding overexposing Color 92, do you suggest just not taking away the plastic notch on the cartridges, even if your camera can handle high ISO 110 film? That would give about 2 stops overexposure.
I haven’t shot Color '92 at 100, so I’m not sure it’s a great idea without any compensation after.
It shoots very well at 320 and 200 though. So maybe 100 with pull processing, could yield quite nice results.
#dbateyssitwiimawby
I'm sure it'll catch on!