China’s J-35 Carrier Fighter Appears; Step To ‘Most Powerful Navy'

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2024
  • In today’s session, we will take a look on the newly China’s J-35 Carrier Fighter, does it a step to the most powerful navy? To answer this question, stay tune at this channel!
    China’s Navy has taken another step toward erasing the last advantages that the US Navy enjoys, in the form of the new, stealthy carrier fighter aircraft known as the J-35. It is a fighter jet that China’s military once considered a white elephant appears to have finally secured a role as the country’s newest carrier fighter.
    Prior to the introduction of the J-35, the backbone of China’s air force was the J-15 fighter. The J-15 is a reverse-engineered Chinese copy of the Russian Sukhoi Su-33, a fourth-generation fighter which has been thoroughly surpassed by U.S. planes such as the F-22 and F-35.
    In fact, the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation has existed as an actual flying platform since 2011, after which it progressed through three major design iterations and several designators (F-60/J-31/ and FC-31) before resurfacing as the J-35 aircraft which features a redesigned wing and an elongated fuselage optimised for a lower radar cross section (RCS).
    The J-35’s first public appearance was as the J-31 at the 2014 Air Show China expo. This model was fitted with two underpowered Russian-made engines originally developed for the Mikoyan MiG-29.
    All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.
    A New American $155 Million Drone • MQ-25 Stingray: A New ...
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
    / militarytv.channel
    defense-tv.com/
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 2.4K

  • @Military-TV
    @Military-TV  ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A New American $155 Million Drone th-cam.com/video/4VJA2R0Xp7Q/w-d-xo.html

  • @liujoshua7191
    @liujoshua7191 2 ปีที่แล้ว +891

    Guess what!The Chinese had just stolen two seats' design of F22 from the U.S. to develop their J-20. Oops, the U.S. didn't have a two seats' version F22 yet.

    • @halova962
      @halova962 2 ปีที่แล้ว +167

      +10 social credit.

    • @acewyvern3489
      @acewyvern3489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      No they stole it from Ace Combat what do you mean
      Is a joke
      xD

    • @changtang428
      @changtang428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +143

      兄弟,你讲了一个国际笑话,小心被美国的小弟攻击。😂

    • @nopenotme7164
      @nopenotme7164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@halova962 wdym, he's stating a fact

    • @yeahcharlie81
      @yeahcharlie81 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @Halova So smart and original. Nobody has ever heard the social credit before.

  • @gyanbanks74
    @gyanbanks74 2 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    When the Romans came up with catapults, others that were belligerent quickly developed catapults of similar kind!

    • @changtang428
      @changtang428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      在欧洲人吹嘘他们历史上的皇帝很厉害时,他们其实就已经是笑话,十万人的战争他们认为规模很大,但在中国同一时期的战争已经是20万-100人级别的战争。说明什么?

    • @timetraveller2300
      @timetraveller2300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      the Qin and Han were much more powerful than the Romans. hahaha

    • @user-on6ul5ke8b
      @user-on6ul5ke8b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@timetraveller2300i don't know whether Qin and Han were more powerful than the Romans, but I'm sure China is more weeker than the US now. Enjoy your blackouts!

    • @timetraveller2300
      @timetraveller2300 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@user-on6ul5ke8b LOL dude you can find videos of youtubers take nigh walks in China. there are so many these kind of videos. blackout? how brainwashing your media can be? seriously, shanghai has a population larger than your entire "country". probably China's blackouts in some small cities is a huge deal to you. 你姓刘 what an insult to the Han dynasty. shameful.

    • @menradmwaliko3661
      @menradmwaliko3661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@user-on6ul5ke8b the good thing is USA is eating itself slowly. Strong mmm 🤔 maybe only strong for poor weak enemies who can’t shoot back. We need to taste one enemy who is capable to hit back home like Russia China or Iran 😅

  • @deven6518
    @deven6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +360

    Anyone realize that this jet is quite different from the f35. There are other 5th gen proposals that would be called copy's from a visual standpoint. The design philosophy for stealth results in similar platforms. If they did get anything from the f35, the finer workings are what's important. The shape of an aircraft is about the easiest part to figure out for stealth.

    • @kuanged
      @kuanged 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Few people here will appreciate this comment.

    • @user-es5sb7qy1m
      @user-es5sb7qy1m 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      No, no, no, it is generally believed that there is still a gap of at least half a century between China and the United States, both in quantity and quality

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@user-es5sb7qy1m this belief is quite untrue. The latest generation of us airframes are the f22 and f35. Just doing the math, 50years before their release, it doesn't add up. It has never been true tbh. After Ww2, china had nothing but keep in mind that almost all American, European and soviet technologies were essentially scrapped for novel german tech, jet engines, delta wings and advanced radio technologies for example, so we can count that as square one. China would only have been as far back as the Soviet technologies they were licensed to produce (and eventually reverse engineered). We can take that as china's first step. China has caught up in most respects and is ahead in some (although those aren't directly related to the airframes themselves). Think of it this way, if it really was 50years, they'd only just start developing 4th gen

    • @haidongzheng3009
      @haidongzheng3009 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@deven6518 He was being sarcastic. Video like this truly gives China the time to develop quietly.

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@haidongzheng3009 huh, that one flew over my head, no pun intended

  • @user-ns5of9ko8k
    @user-ns5of9ko8k 2 ปีที่แล้ว +282

    I think imitation in this case is pragmatic on the Chinese side given the circumstance that it needs to quickly catch up with the U.S., original designs will cost more money and time while doesn’t guarantee success. What China needs right now is to imitate what others already have and innovate what others don’t have. This is clearly demonstrated through its continuing usage of the Russian flanker airframe design while at the same time developing its own concepts in the case of the anti-ship ballistic missile or the hypersonic orbital bombardment system it just tested recently.

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      In the military world if you follow up on military history, everyone is copying from everyone and why not? RnD is costly and time consuming. Any information you can get helps alot

    • @oceanwave4502
      @oceanwave4502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Imagining the US researched F-22/F-35: they had 10 directions, they tested those, they finalized the most optimal design.
      In case of China: should they follow the same approach? (investigated 10 directions and then simply ended up with the almost SAME design)? Why don't just study THE approach that has been working!!! And save tons of resources... Of course, China has to modify here and there to fit their tactic preference as well as devices...

    • @aburetik4866
      @aburetik4866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Your logic is right, but you are fooled by this video. This video makes fake accusation to China backed with no concrete evidence of stealing F35 technology. And this propaganda video brainwashes ppl into a false impression that F-35 is superior to China.
      F-35 itself is a failed design. Even USA's own navy prefers F-18. Just look at the bulky shape of F35, China would be the last one to steal that stupid design.

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@aburetik4866 the f35 isn't superior to anything, it can't super cruise, it can't dogfight worth a damn, it can't operate independently, it's weapons loading is crap without external pylons and it doesn't help that it's stealth is questionable.

    • @diwang4572
      @diwang4572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Just because it has wings doesn't mean its a copy lol.

  • @michaeld1170
    @michaeld1170 2 ปีที่แล้ว +256

    Correction, the US has not "spent" 1.5 trillion on the F-35. That figure is called a lifetime cost estimate. In other words, the US and all F-35 operators are projected to spend $1.5 trillion over the F-35's 60 year lifespan. That figure is also adjusted for year 2070 inflation rates

    • @dns7587
      @dns7587 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      How could you even manage to spend 1.5 trillion on the development of a jet plane? Like for that cost they should've developed and built space elevators to construct spaceships on Earth's orbit or something lol . I mean even if you pay your engineers astronomical sums of money for the designs and prototypes still $1.5 trillion jesus lol

    • @michaeld1170
      @michaeld1170 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@dns7587
      Read it again. Nobody spent 1.5 trillion on the F-35. Thats the ESTIMATED cost from development back in 1996 all the way up to retirement in 2070. And it is adjusted for 2070 inflation.
      That involves 74 years worth of fuel, weapons, maintenance, training cost, upgrades, as well as all the research and developemt.
      Oh and by the way the F-35 is the only weapons system that has a lifecycle costs estimate. If you did that for the B-52 it would be much much bigger since the B-52 is nearing it's 100 year anniversary in 2047 and there are still no plans on retiring it

    • @ComfortsSpecter
      @ComfortsSpecter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaeld1170 “…”

    • @mujur9101
      @mujur9101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaeld1170 🤭🤭🤭 wanna add some wed?

    • @troyezell5841
      @troyezell5841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are exactly right! Detractors have misstated, misquoted and literally lied at times in order to speak against the F35 program.

  • @zhoubaidinh403
    @zhoubaidinh403 2 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    When you need to develop defensive systems against your neighbors and others, don't matter how you get the technology...just get it!

    • @zhoubaidinh403
      @zhoubaidinh403 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      the cannons, the gunpowder, the compass...oh yeah...just make sure you prepare like darwinian forces compel you!

    • @Ren-tq1hs
      @Ren-tq1hs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And its cheaper than trying to develop a new jet

    • @noco7243
      @noco7243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I agree but I'm still gonna make fun of them for it. They love to talk a bit game but then pull this shit every times lol.

    • @15seconds3
      @15seconds3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I agree. All is fair in love and war.. Nothing is off the books, the only goal is to win.

    • @thesauce1682
      @thesauce1682 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      These babies whine that china isn't playing "fair". So mentally deranged.

  • @chaowang8999
    @chaowang8999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    一个派出军队,天天在其他国家打仗的国家的政客和人民说某个在追赶国家是狂热的好战分子

    • @user-wi9qb2cy3s
      @user-wi9qb2cy3s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      毕竟世界警察

    • @user-on6ul5ke8b
      @user-on6ul5ke8b 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      China is not hostile?! Best joke today.

    • @teng-wuchang9305
      @teng-wuchang9305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      China attempts to expand and conquer is the reason why many countries around it have no choice but to improve their defense power.

    • @jsc9567
      @jsc9567 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@teng-wuchang9305 India: Are you talking about me?

    • @jsc9567
      @jsc9567 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@teng-wuchang9305 And just one question, which country is going to be conquered? Korea? Russia? Mongolia? Vietnam? Or just India?

  • @powasjington4262
    @powasjington4262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +165

    Hey remember when the Roman Byzantines stole Chinese silkworms? These thing come and go in spurts, Chinese gave us paper and gunpowder too so we don’t need to worry about it.

    • @baratjanhighlights6393
      @baratjanhighlights6393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      That’s the stupidest analogy I ever heard

    • @WildsDreams45
      @WildsDreams45 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@baratjanhighlights6393 It's not. The United States stole a lot of tech and how do you think the Japanese caught up to the West so fast?
      Technology theft and sharing is a natural part of humanity. You have to have the PS1 before the PS5 and Pong before even the PS1. Think about the guy/company who invented the first motorized car or how hard the Wright Brothers fought to protect their pattent on the airplane.
      China can't invade Taiwan, Russia can't invade Ukraine and the United States can't invade Iran or North Korea just like how the Soviet Union couldn't invade West Germany. This is the reality of geopolitics today and globalization.
      Besides, humanity is going to get more from this rivalry than from the USA being the only superpower.
      Side note: Think about what happened to Roman ship innovation after they counqured the entire Mediterranean. Competition is a good thing.

    • @mustafaamiri3277
      @mustafaamiri3277 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@WildsDreams45 i agree 100%

    • @matthewmartin7391
      @matthewmartin7391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@WildsDreams45 japan didn't rlly have to steal military technology since the countries were very close allies from the 60s up

    • @WildsDreams45
      @WildsDreams45 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@matthewmartin7391 I'm talking about the Meji Restoration to WW2

  • @WilliamSanderson-zh9dq
    @WilliamSanderson-zh9dq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    J-35? They’re not even hiding it’s knock off status. It’s basically advertised as a dollar store F-35.

    • @peepguy3524
      @peepguy3524 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      True lol, they can’t even make their own jets that might be better than America’s. They keep making their bootleg designs from America, jet engines, how it performs, and weapon wise.

    • @regizeelement8511
      @regizeelement8511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Only stupid ppl got their stuff stolen lol

    • @donkeykong516
      @donkeykong516 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      You missed the point, what’s inside that matters. All planes have wings & tails buddy. If China’s jets are insignificant then why the US military is so concerned

    • @WilliamSanderson-zh9dq
      @WilliamSanderson-zh9dq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@donkeykong516 did I miss the point? Maybe the US is concerned about the pair major data leaks from subcontractors in 2007 and 2015 that led to another country having a knock off weapons system? Think what Lockheed Martin and the US tax payers might have to say about subcontractors leaking design plans after they spent billions?

    • @luism5514
      @luism5514 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      see comment below yours

  • @LuckyDuckie115
    @LuckyDuckie115 2 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    Maybe the US should spend some $$$ on network security.

    • @boomerhgt
      @boomerhgt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good point

    • @hongzhizhao1929
      @hongzhizhao1929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      lol us military spending is greater than the military spending of world top 2-10 military spenders combined.

    • @y-3084
      @y-3084 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      My friend, trust me. You already have the safest network on earth. you deleted your former president's twitter, remember that? Isn't that safe enough?

    • @aburetik4866
      @aburetik4866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      This propaganda video makes fake accusation to China backed with no concrete evidence of stealing F35 technology, in order to brainwash ppl into a false impression that F-35 is superior to China.
      F-35 itself is a failed design. Even USA's own navy prefers F-18. Just look at the bulky shape of F35, China would be the last one to steal that stupid design.

    • @n0nac481
      @n0nac481 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aburetik4866 exactly and the way politics and military contracts work they literally cannot stop funding of the F-35 or discontinue it so they will keep on producing this junk aircraft

  • @wernerzikeli7606
    @wernerzikeli7606 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Before J-20 all experts exposed that China is 25 years behind the US fighter technology. 5 years ago the experts have stated that China has no own jet turbine for the fighters - Today China has closed the gap and is even in some technologies advanced (hypersonic missiles/6G/AI/Robotics/photonic and graphene chips). It will be interesting to hear the experts voice coming next.

    • @LanaaAmor
      @LanaaAmor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      experts? more like high school bloggers

    • @LanaaAmor
      @LanaaAmor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @John Grigg too crinj

    • @francoragos1374
      @francoragos1374 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is it that no western country their copycat jet?

    • @user-es3me5qf7o
      @user-es3me5qf7o 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @John Grigg Why?

    • @Speak_truth0009
      @Speak_truth0009 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      China Steals The Technology of His Interest From The World.

  • @whalesong4649
    @whalesong4649 2 ปีที่แล้ว +194

    It is very weird that many people call the new plane "J35" instead of a more likely name: J31. This new carrier fighter is developed from the design of the FC-31. Similar problem to the Type 99A tank, which is used to be called "Type 99A2" for no reason.

    • @bosoerjadi2838
      @bosoerjadi2838 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It is the Chinese themselves who (intend to) call it J-35. So better to ask them.

    • @gadzadhamgaacaan8488
      @gadzadhamgaacaan8488 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@bosoerjadi2838 No, it was the PLA watchers to first call it J35.

    • @chamscen4253
      @chamscen4253 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Actually,the final name is J35--From the introductin of the designer's lecture

    • @yueyu1479
      @yueyu1479 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@bosoerjadi2838 no not really, we call it J-31 "Falcon Eagle"

    • @dannytadashi4235
      @dannytadashi4235 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Military TV SUCH A FAKE ASS NEWS 😃😃😃🖕🖕🖕🖕!!!

  • @dbloskijr4665
    @dbloskijr4665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    it might be a knockoff who knows, but still impressive they can develop so fast and with much less money, they got the industrial capability to produce it quickly

    • @jensonhanohano2572
      @jensonhanohano2572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      It’s not impressive when you don’t have to do any RnD… that’s why it’s more inexpensive

    • @dbloskijr4665
      @dbloskijr4665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      @@jensonhanohano2572 reverse engineering is part of rnd, everybody does it. china knows the only way to catch up is to reverse engineer of a proven design. the result is what matter the most, newest tech that previously only big nation can afford, available for cheap

    • @allenseeallendo5844
      @allenseeallendo5844 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What do you men “who knows”. It’s definitely stolen and it’s incredibly concerning that China lifted this information after the allies developed it for around a trillion dollars.

    • @dbloskijr4665
      @dbloskijr4665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@allenseeallendo5844 have you seen other stealth fighter jet design like russian su-57 and checkmate, or swedish or turk design they all quite similar to americans f22 and f35, for example the diamond shape wings. stealth properties still bound to aerodynamics so they have similar "shape". simply calling them knockoff is just not fitting

    • @dbloskijr4665
      @dbloskijr4665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      anyway that's why im saying it is impressive that the chinese can pull it off without spending trilion. is it stolen design maybe, if it is then what about it. the result is all that matters

  • @alunrees5130
    @alunrees5130 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Russian and Iran was working on a similar project over 15years ago

    • @luism5514
      @luism5514 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      but who is fielding them ?

    • @allenseeallendo5844
      @allenseeallendo5844 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@luism5514 Nobody because Russia and iran are broke.

    • @luism5514
      @luism5514 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@allenseeallendo5844 China will ramp these by mid decade

    • @allenseeallendo5844
      @allenseeallendo5844 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@luism5514 It’s possible. They have the ability to do it.

    • @user-rs9sg3qq1p
      @user-rs9sg3qq1p 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      LoL Iran still operates F4s in 2021.

  • @jepstein3207
    @jepstein3207 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    1.7 trillion total cost for the f35 program and the Chinese just steal it, love these guys

    • @johnlop7763
      @johnlop7763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's not better than the f 35

    • @jepstein3207
      @jepstein3207 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnlop7763 doesn't matter

    • @johnlop7763
      @johnlop7763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jepstein3207 and it look like a knock off f 22

    • @jepstein3207
      @jepstein3207 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnlop7763 it looks like a knockoff f35

    • @johnlop7763
      @johnlop7763 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jepstein3207 more like*

  • @frankmerriwell8339
    @frankmerriwell8339 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    This J-35 looks tough, now let's see how it performs under water. The F-35 seems not so good on that aspect lol.

    • @nekoericson5256
      @nekoericson5256 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      50 cent army troll

    • @yukin1990
      @yukin1990 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It will be worse....

    • @l0z586
      @l0z586 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      F 22 Cant even land on carrier I bet it’s more garbage even above water

    • @yukin1990
      @yukin1990 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@l0z586 J-20 can't either......

    • @taoistwu7130
      @taoistwu7130 ปีที่แล้ว

      lmao

  • @Zlorthishen
    @Zlorthishen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    3000 social credits have been added to you for watching this video.

    • @waichungsham1578
      @waichungsham1578 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Look what happened to Dave chappelles social credit in America when he upset the woke folks you can just as easily get hounded for your views in America even stating facts.

    • @boomerhgt
      @boomerhgt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha ha brilliant

    • @raymondli2355
      @raymondli2355 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      you do realise your credit card is kind of a ‘social credit’ right (:

    • @davout5775
      @davout5775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@waichungsham1578 Dave has full support of the American public. The woke dogs are just the most vocal but at the end of the day they are a very small minority in America. The problem is that they have the most of the news network on their side. That's why you see that these same news networks are losing their viewership. Also when somebody start supporting them like NBA their rating are going down faster then the Economy of Venezuela

    • @limjitfong6701
      @limjitfong6701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      2 indian scalps have been sent to your address for commenting.

  • @acewyvern3489
    @acewyvern3489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    wait till they find out that the F-35 is using Russian VTOL technology lmao

    • @drperky7008
      @drperky7008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      😔 I’m sorry about your brain condition

    • @acewyvern3489
      @acewyvern3489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@drperky7008 lockheed literally bought it from Jakowlew after they developed the Jak-141 (1. Flight march 1987)
      How about you actually look shit up before commenting

    • @grixjay8620
      @grixjay8620 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@drperky7008 lol, you got owned bro..

    • @noco7243
      @noco7243 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@acewyvern3489 I'm sorry for your bad reading compression.

    • @vkqtran4721
      @vkqtran4721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@acewyvern3489 If you think F-35 VTOL is 100% pure Russian technology than you’re stupid. We only bought the information for pointers and research. Don’t be so delusional. There’s no way the US would do something so Chinese.

  • @milekragulj325
    @milekragulj325 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you count the numbor of engines in J-35. thanks.

  • @bearhead9633
    @bearhead9633 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    If you purchased an F-35 on Wish I guess this would be it.

  • @TangoLima1
    @TangoLima1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    The J-15 is based on a Su-33 prototype. The J-15 is NOT the back bone of the PLAAF, rather it is currently the back bone of the PLANAF (the naval aviation)

    • @xuchen4012
      @xuchen4012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      J15 is NOT based on Su-33, but on Ukraine T-10K which is actually the navy version of Su27.

    • @TangoLima1
      @TangoLima1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@xuchen4012 That is why i wrote "Su-33 PROTOTYPE".

    • @Jadefox32
      @Jadefox32 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xuchen4012 likewise they have to actually make the planes, US is already moving towards the next generation while the PRC is still playing catch up. Could they surpass the USN/USAF? Sure if they spend their resources efficiently but with the PRCs woeful management of resources and yesmen even the best homegrown aircraft isn't a safe bet.

    • @keith6371
      @keith6371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Jadefox32 you mean the efficient country that just left Afghanistan, or burned down its first line 1 billion dollar ship or ran a 3 billion dollar sub into a undersea mountain, that efficient country?

    • @lxjilyfe
      @lxjilyfe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Jadefox32 the US is still using F18 as its backbone of the carrier strike force, because it's cheap and efficient comparing to F35

  • @myplane150
    @myplane150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    It's funny how so many people (not this site, of course) immediately jump to the conclusion that these new aircraft (including the Russian Checkmate) are as good or better than the F35 or even the F22. No one can know for sure (at this time) if these are truly stealthy and capable or just another 4++ airframe. I doubt very much that they are in the same league as the F35.

    • @martintiema463
      @martintiema463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      So we should take your word for it coz you're an aviation expert or a lead engineer in the aforementioned programs ?

    • @myplane150
      @myplane150 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@martintiema463 Nope, not an expert but if you read my comment, I said: "No one can know for sure (at this time) if these are truly stealthy and capable or just another 4++ airframe"....
      We kinda know what the F35 can do but know nothing of the 75 (checkmate) or the Chinese 35.. That was my point. ☺

    • @kennethcrawford3325
      @kennethcrawford3325 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Remember one thing that USA military doesn’t tell you everything we have at our disposal and by the time you hear about it we done moved ahead to something new my first 4 years of the Navy I was a Jet mechanic. So I’m pretty sure I know what I’m talking about

    • @rubenlopez3364
      @rubenlopez3364 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stealth Jets also have special coatings and Jammers that people seem to forget about

    • @brandonandreski1709
      @brandonandreski1709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah it's based on the F35, you can take one look at it and see that its practically a carbon copy externally. Thankfully it's nothing more than a cheap imitation. The J35 costs considerably less and has a shorter range as well and has a lower top speed. Its stealth is also iffy as the materials needed to create fully stealth aircraft are a closely guarded secret on analog systems. ALso they are again too expensive.

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    development on a second stealth fighter should be alot faster than the first because most of the fundamentals would already have been established. AND unlike the F35, it isn't trying to fill half a dozen roles at once

    • @user-zk6rx5nt9o
      @user-zk6rx5nt9o 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      for the company that develop it (chengdu), it's their first. because j20 was made by different company (shenyang).

    • @AR15andGOD
      @AR15andGOD 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your head will roll when we take back the united states from the communists

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AR15andGOD lol. Maybe after the US tears itself apart in civil war 2.0

    • @patrickweaver1105
      @patrickweaver1105 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's a multi-role fighter. Yes it's trying to fill half a dozen roles at once. Most fighters are multi role now it's too
      expensive to build single role dedicated fighters especially carrier aircraft.

    • @Keith-jp6jw
      @Keith-jp6jw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bruh it’s a multi role fighter? That’s literally what it’s for.

  • @herojiro31valmire32
    @herojiro31valmire32 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Wow, they must have built day and night in a superhuman effort to build such a large Navy so fast.

    • @underdogtv2855
      @underdogtv2855 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I hear they have people working 7 days a week or everyday for several years for 16 to 18 hours long and several shifts.

    • @ziranshuzhang6831
      @ziranshuzhang6831 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@underdogtv2855 it's called 'people rest, the machine doesn't', 3 shift of different people operates the machine in a 24/7 manner.

    • @bigd9260
      @bigd9260 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Thats what scares me about the Chinese and what most dont understand. Its not what they have now, Its how fast they can build and how fast there military is expanding. Does it really matter how good the J35 is compared to our F35? They will build 100 of them to every 1 we can build.

    • @herojiro31valmire32
      @herojiro31valmire32 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      96% of China is located on one side of China. Just one missile hitting their dam would cause a severe blow. Plus, most of the world sees China as the threat they are with COVID (CCP bioweapon) and other reasons. China's greatest weakness comes from within. Russia even would love to destroy China. Plus India is building a world class military and they are American allies. It would be China against the world and they would have to totally control their own population. If in the future they control the world it would no longer be worth saving.

    • @randomviewer9976
      @randomviewer9976 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@herojiro31valmire32 Not true at all. Firstly America wouldn't dare firing a missile at China, this isn't a third world country like Afghanistan, unless you want HGV travelling at hypersonic speeds in your most densely populated areas, then you should stop with the big boy act. China can and will retaliate. And China's population is patriotic, if anything you should worry about America where people absolutely despise politicans and there is a protest every other month against the state for oppression. BLM and what not. India is not a threat against China, why do you think China has Pakistan as a staunch ally? It is arming Pakistan, India's main adversary, India can't afford going against China because it's inviting a two front war which it cannot handle, at all. China and Russia are allies, they have a common enemy.

  • @WoopyGoldbergsHair
    @WoopyGoldbergsHair 2 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    The J-20 was tracked by a SU-33 with conventional radar. Stealth is not just the shape of the vehicle, and China is mainly interested in maintaining the appearance of strength - while being too unsure of itself to display it.

    • @janusjones6519
      @janusjones6519 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      That comes from an Indian military claim right after their attempted border incursion was thwarted by the Chinese. We of course we should all take such claim as fact because there is absolutely no reason for india to lie here

    • @janusjones6519
      @janusjones6519 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Vince Nav Why do you say he is most likely not indian? What proof do you have? On the contrary, only an indian will take indian propaganda as fact which makes him far more likely to be indian or pro-indian

    • @cubeshapedwombat6821
      @cubeshapedwombat6821 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You do realize that BOTH the US & China purposefuly increase their stealth jets' rcs in peace time, right? So as to not allow adversaries to accurately gauge the real rcs of their stealth fighters.

    • @MossadDid911
      @MossadDid911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Look up Luneburg lens and radar reflectors. Stop falling for indian lies

    • @user-pt7sg5ol8z
      @user-pt7sg5ol8z 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      This is a pretty unlikely scenario a Chinese stealth fighter had been detected by a Russia carrier fighter. The probability of this encounter is really low.

  • @ricky836
    @ricky836 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If the F22 and the F35 had a baby.

  • @BeelP.
    @BeelP. ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You cannot "copy" a US stealth plane. The weight distribution and engine thrust differences makes any "copy" useless for practical purposes. So all this talk about copying or partial theft of the underlying tech is not worth anything at all.

    • @allenz4868
      @allenz4868 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      These idiots always go like this: look, it’s got two wings and look like, must have stole ours.

  • @zwen3763
    @zwen3763 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The designation J is only given when the design is adopted by the army. J31 and J35 were made up by some forum amateurs and by using them in your video exposes where you get your info from.

  • @NDAGR-
    @NDAGR- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    This channel is way better than I initially thought. It’s really good

    • @frankmueller6522
      @frankmueller6522 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The most modern army on this planet is the US-Army and even Russia and China are better in some points but at the most points the USA is the number one on this planet! This is good because America is a democracy and Russia and China are dictatorships!

    • @vdotme
      @vdotme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@frankmueller6522 The United States has been responsible for the deaths of more innocent civilians than all the world put together since Pol Pot. Democracy is just a label.

    • @vdotme
      @vdotme 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's improved a lot recently. It used to be a bit trash with bot voice & questionable research.

    • @matthewwhite8484
      @matthewwhite8484 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vdotme ok

    • @Veldtian1
      @Veldtian1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@frankmueller6522 The USA is a Constitutional Republic first and foremost, it's democracy is it's greatest impediment and is set to fragment it beyond repair.

  • @korasones1009
    @korasones1009 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The shell might look alike of the F 35..but not the internals...

  • @andrewlambert7246
    @andrewlambert7246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If Argentina gets this fighter then Britain is in trouble over the Falklands.

  • @user-dh3op7uu7k
    @user-dh3op7uu7k 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The accompanying photo is wrong, the J-35 is not the FC-20 or J-31 that appeared before.The latest photo has appeared.

  • @jasonong7097
    @jasonong7097 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    It should be called the J-35 Clone Falcon

    • @pua0150
      @pua0150 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean If it works then why not, why go through the rial & error design it when other countries are already passed that, Learning from their development Is a great move 👌

    • @mantisracingchannel3910
      @mantisracingchannel3910 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Never underestimate your opponent…

    • @82boulou
      @82boulou 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The US never clone a technology , they are people of integrity , they bring the Nazi scientists themselves , pardon them and make them head of their ballistic missile program and space program 😂

    • @pingzhang3387
      @pingzhang3387 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      笑死我了,j35比f35先进多了,而且是2个发动机,哪来的克隆

  • @andrashavas
    @andrashavas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I believe that by looking at the Chinese air force and navy one forgets that real military power grows through the integration of weapon systems and weapon groups. This time, it is great the China has carriers. So they put stealth fighters on them. Very good. But do not forget, that by modernizing the missile warfare and satellite systems one could theoretically arm a carrier with observation drones and missiles could be fired from thousands of kilometers. Same goes for submarines. Do not need to be hunter-killer subs. Just recon subs. Rockets do the rest. How about that? So while the US needs carriers to deliver their birds to 3rd world countries which they can bomb to shit, China just needs a drone carrier and is in a totally different position to the US, since its potential targets are much closer. In this sense, China should also develop missile battleships.

    • @draker769
      @draker769 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, still a lot of things to do. But why would everyoe want a hot war between US and China

    • @andrashavas
      @andrashavas 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@draker769 Simply because in a finite world with finite resources you can only expand if you take it forcefully. Otherwise you keep diluting the resources selling again and again. That is the basic rule of market economy.

    • @draker769
      @draker769 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrashavas There is no such thing as finite world only finite imagination. Your argument here is similar to that of Malthus and it has been proven wrong. So yeah, no need for take or be taken.

    • @user-fs9kc1vo4o
      @user-fs9kc1vo4o 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@draker769 The battle between the world's number one and the world's number two

    • @benganchan1420
      @benganchan1420 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well , america aircraft carriers were deployed fighting the vietnamese and the afghans.
      afghanistan is the new asian superpower, defeated tang dynasty china in 8th century, britain in 19th century, russia in 1989, america in 2021 . Defeating 4 erstwhile powers is a nice military track record
      vietnam defeated france in 1954, america in 1975, china in 1979 . 2nd runners up for defeating 3 erstwhile powers

  • @shadygraves
    @shadygraves ปีที่แล้ว +2

    On a brand new STEAM POWERED air craft carrier. Way to go there, Admiral Dum Phuk!

    • @bryanhe8908
      @bryanhe8908 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Emm, but isn't this how most large ships work? The source of energy could be fossil fuel or bio fuel or nuclear or whatever, but they are all used to boil water, which produces steam to drive trubines... So in that sense, the USS Gerald R. Ford would also be a STEAM POWERED carrier LOL. As many have jokingly pointed out, the pinnacle of technology is more advanced ways of boiling water, so yeah, nearly 300 years after Watt perfected the steam engine, steam power still rocks LOL.

  • @bulshomedia6995
    @bulshomedia6995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why you closed hussein kurdi Chanel please tell me the reason

  • @YaMomsOyster
    @YaMomsOyster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Bloody hell they couldn’t even come up with a Original Name for the bad Counterfeit.
    Thieves never prosper.

    • @waichungsham1578
      @waichungsham1578 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Chill out lady

    • @marblerun5149
      @marblerun5149 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@waichungsham1578 wong tong ming mong i eat dogs

    • @shaunguo1165
      @shaunguo1165 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well I don't know why they changed the name from J-31 to J-35...

    • @YaMomsOyster
      @YaMomsOyster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shaunguo1165 they Trolling us bad now the cheeky barsted’s ……and I’m a man baby

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@shaunguo1165 they didn’t. It is still FC-31

  • @robbies7191
    @robbies7191 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really enjoy watching the performances of people who bite their teeth at the rise of China but have no idea what to do, hahaha

    • @weld_dat_fakah740
      @weld_dat_fakah740 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Have no idea what to do... kind of like the Chinese pilots who participated in war games over in Korea last year..

  • @sisshumaro
    @sisshumaro ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The most important of the vehicle is an engine performance to how longer years in active.

  • @deeplyheartbroke
    @deeplyheartbroke 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Japanese used to be called copycats. USSR and many other nations later, now it is China's turn. It is high time to look at the one who often called others as copycat.

  • @alamjim6117
    @alamjim6117 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Shape of stealth fighter is mostly derived by computer simulations, so it's possible that the computer softwares used by these armies result in similar shape. Look at KF-21 by Korea or TF-X by Turkey. Don't just call it a copy when others are also making similar aircrafts with similar specs. Also F-35s are single engine, this is double.

    • @itzjustjack1414
      @itzjustjack1414 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would say it took more of a design spec from the f22.

  • @penguinlin85
    @penguinlin85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Funny the PLA called it the J35. Must be a tribute to the F35 for being the blueprint for it.

    • @acewyvern3489
      @acewyvern3489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Except they didnt call it J35, its a common thing for news/media/whatever to just come up with names on chinese Airframes, because they need a name to call it, the actual designation is FC-31, and this is the only name tht can 100% be applied

    • @penguinlin85
      @penguinlin85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@acewyvern3489 Nice to know. Thanks.

    • @evergreenhills
      @evergreenhills 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      J35 has two engines while F35 only gets one engine. So F35 blueprint is useless per this point of view.

    • @penguinlin85
      @penguinlin85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@evergreenhills No its is still relevant. Designs are modular not as a whole. You can mix and match to your needs. Anyway the J35 is closer to design to both the F22 in my point of view. I guess the designers in CCP land watched a lot of american movies to copy it so well LOL.

    • @guruxara7994
      @guruxara7994 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@penguinlin85 I mean, physics are limited, so there's a limited number of possible shapes for a Stealth fighter.

  • @jiokl7g9t6
    @jiokl7g9t6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Expect a 2 seat version for drone swarm command.

  • @hcjet
    @hcjet 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    spoke J35 but most of pic/video are FC31, they are actually 2 different airplanes

  • @layingdragon2234
    @layingdragon2234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Whenever people thinks about how China developed tech so fast, they start to find any rumors about them cheating. I mean, even the leaders of China has engineer degree, you know it is still level of talent lead to your innovation not the lawyers.

    • @rinzler9775
      @rinzler9775 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The CCP ranks are filled with stupid people - it is the poor people who work hard who are smart with the engineering knowledge and the fat cat CCP live off them.

    • @derek96720
      @derek96720 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not rumors. There are numerous cases of corporate and cyber espionage by chinese state-controlled individuals and servers. You think Chinese engineers are so smart that they can suddenly go from 3rd gen tech to 5th gen tech in a decade?

    • @rinzler9775
      @rinzler9775 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@derek96720 and also, the designs are almost the same - a straight rip off. China also does this with cars.

  • @andidonk9707
    @andidonk9707 2 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Just from the similarity in size and outlooks, you conclude it’s a copy of f35, revealing that how you are unprofessional in aeronautics. A big difference in the amount of engines has already a totally important impact on the aircraft design, who studying aeronautical engineering will understand. Z20 is an improvement for the Blackhawk helicopter, which was sold from USA to China in the last century and is a fact.

    • @marvinpostadan3484
      @marvinpostadan3484 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    • @menradmwaliko3661
      @menradmwaliko3661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The world doesn’t care anymore. We already know your stupid lies of copy this copy that nonsense. Keep on crying but China won’t build planes that look like trees. It’s obvious many things look similar and that’s nature. The west doesn’t like competition haha 😂

    • @marvinpostadan3484
      @marvinpostadan3484 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lmao its not trees but paper airplanes!

    • @matthewwhite8484
      @matthewwhite8484 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      English 100

    • @davidelamora79
      @davidelamora79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Just because of your comment we can say that you don't know absolutely nothing about you're talking about. All planes have external similarities, that's something you can't avoid when making an aircraft. But sustaning that one is the cooy of the other just because of that is absurd, an aircraft is muuuuuuch more than just a the design of his silhouette.

  • @EuropeanSoyboy
    @EuropeanSoyboy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't get why people get so mad at Chinese for "copying stuff". Probably what is the most important empire of the western civilization, the Roman Empire always copied his enemies strategies, formations, innovation throughout all of his history. Copying is not stupid at all imo...

  • @alanfoo6155
    @alanfoo6155 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The verdict is still open as no one knows the J35 electronics and technology as Chinese tech is now ahead in many areas .
    Good luck

    • @Veldtian1
      @Veldtian1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      C'mon man, approaching parity to the USA in some areas..

  • @acewyvern3489
    @acewyvern3489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    another one that got it wrong,
    the J-15 is a copy of the Su-33, but except of the appearance, and role, thats all they have in common. The J-15 is FAR superior to the Su-33

    • @andrewhomo2461
      @andrewhomo2461 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well one was created in 1990-s, another is build in early 2010-s. What would you aspect. It is still a copy, though.

    • @acewyvern3489
      @acewyvern3489 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@andrewhomo2461 its not what i mean.
      The J-15 is a reverse-engineered Su-33, they studied it and built a new plane based on it, it still is a copy, but it is FAR more than that.
      Its a Su-33, but with the capabilities of the F-18
      Its lighter than the 33, its faster, more agile, has an higher takeoff load (tho held back by the current carrier design), the avionics are arguebly top modern stuff (2019, tho propaganda so who knows)
      and it got an AESA radar.
      Compared to the Su-33, the J-15 is an spaceship

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't forget do you know, once China fully developed the GPS jamming system, alone its door steps and in SCS and NCS all those F-35, or even higher number will be useless ---- a blind leading a blind. China does has its own GPS system for its fighters.

  • @bright5967
    @bright5967 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    2 inefficient engines same size as the 35, am sure it has no range

    • @munanyochopapi887
      @munanyochopapi887 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The author of this video is ignorant,It's called FC-31 or J-31, never heard of the J35....He just wanted to express that China copied F35

    • @EntityVII
      @EntityVII 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@munanyochopapi887 That's the point of the title because it's a blatant copy. lol

  • @user-uv9rk5nl2s
    @user-uv9rk5nl2s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    我可以告诉你们,根本没有J20 ,没有J35,都是电脑CG,别担心,我们爱好和平,我们的目标是星辰大海!

  • @vinceiverbarmenta2314
    @vinceiverbarmenta2314 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Plus 1000 social credits for making Taiwan part of China

  • @callmedaddy6577
    @callmedaddy6577 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Imagine Russia had the same economy as China.

    • @brandonandreski1709
      @brandonandreski1709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A nearly bankrupt one?

    • @kidink4562
      @kidink4562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@brandonandreski1709 in your dreams China economy is far from bankrupt they have issues but nothing that cant be fixed

    • @brandonandreski1709
      @brandonandreski1709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kidink4562 no I’d rather the Chinese government stay out of the peoples way and China not be bankrupt. Honestly in my dreams Chinese government looks very much like a free China Not a threatening communist mess responsible for the deaths of almost 100,000,000 people in the last 70 years. I would love nothing more than to see a strong Chinese people who don’t have to live in fear of their government. But yes there are some huge economic issues in China right now. For one they can’t even keep all their lights on. Are used to do a lot of business with China until recently their production got pushed back because their factories had to be closed for days out of the week in order to get enough power.

    • @Aw-ev1mv
      @Aw-ev1mv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They did, back in better times...

    • @brandonandreski1709
      @brandonandreski1709 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Douglas Maier not quite yet and if the usa does default we have an internal economy that pics right up. China on the other hand is shutting down its power in many regions, International companies are leaving, And with her aggression against Taiwan the rest of the eastern in the South Pacific Are reluctant to keep diplomatic channels open let alone international trade. The United States on the other hand, because of our type of economy, the government debt has little to do with individual debt. If the government goes out then we take the debt from those that have been taking from the people and we establish our economy based upon land that we have. That would actually increase our value to about 80 trillion. Which would allow us to pay off the debt eliminate the national banking system and reestablish a federal currency. Nations that go bankrupt do not vanish they reorganize. Look at the EU. Half the nations in the EU are bankrupt.

  • @JeferCSon-np1ce
    @JeferCSon-np1ce 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow💪

  • @EzioAuditore
    @EzioAuditore ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not about looks, its about performance, we’ll see if the j35 has over the horizon range in real combat

  • @ronaldwang9838
    @ronaldwang9838 ปีที่แล้ว

    The FC-31 picture shown in the video is not the J-35, there is significant change since version 2 prototype. It can inherit some technology of J-20.

  • @Valeron5
    @Valeron5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    By the time China’s two stealth aircraft equal the F-22 and F-35 the US will have over a 1,000 F-35s and will start to buy the F-22 replacement the 6th gen NGAD fighter for both the USN and USAF (two variants plus unmanned variants).

    • @chargedx5768
      @chargedx5768 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lmfao..usa cant even build 400 f35s for use....yes there are over 800 f35s for the entirity of nato..the usa barely has 400

  • @Waun464
    @Waun464 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We already got another generation stealth fighter otw

  • @evilleader1991
    @evilleader1991 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fair comparison, subbed.

  • @dennishou6399
    @dennishou6399 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    U.S roasting su-33: bad Fly-by wire. China: Hold my 二锅头

  • @Redact63Lluks
    @Redact63Lluks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Having just seen the F-35 A and C performing at an air show... This thing looks like trash. Like comparing Chinese cars to a Rolls Royce.

    • @regizeelement8511
      @regizeelement8511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yeap F35 will soon be like american trains lol

    • @guruxara7994
      @guruxara7994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      American cars aren't that good either...

    • @Redact63Lluks
      @Redact63Lluks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@guruxara7994 yeah true true. I only own cars that have VINs starting in JN.

    • @user-mk2ov4mn2z
      @user-mk2ov4mn2z 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      你自己看看美国通用汽车,林肯汽车,福特汽车,都快倒闭了。看看BYD。

  • @jehamoonsoon2847
    @jehamoonsoon2847 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    In terms of Chinese military technologies sounds like they want to start a clone war.

    • @TOMAS-lh4er
      @TOMAS-lh4er 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No days Im sure there are Americans that will help China steal secrets !!

    • @jehamoonsoon2847
      @jehamoonsoon2847 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TOMAS-lh4er Chinese american for sure.

    • @TOMAS-lh4er
      @TOMAS-lh4er 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jehamoonsoon2847 That's good !! HaHA

    • @timetraveller2300
      @timetraveller2300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      do you want to lock up all Chinese americans? oh wait you aren't white.

    • @TOMAS-lh4er
      @TOMAS-lh4er 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@timetraveller2300 FYI , I meant there are most likely , CCP members in the US that will pass on secrets , not The Chinese American Citizens !!

  • @frqnci2764
    @frqnci2764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The j-20 design was taken from the Russian mig44, the Chinese only did certain modifications to it. But the problems are always the engines.

    • @orlock20
      @orlock20 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Russia was so upset with China over stolen technology that when China bought newer Russian aircraft, Russia black gunked the sold engines so the Chinese could neither copy or repair the engines.

    • @frqnci2764
      @frqnci2764 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@orlock20 for what ive searched russia sold the plans and blueprints. They were working on the model they have today

  • @lucasdurham6830
    @lucasdurham6830 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It looks like a F-35 with F-22 stabilizers

  • @Momoco1212
    @Momoco1212 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    they are angry !
    good job China !

  • @desidog11
    @desidog11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    F-35 from Wish 😂

  • @vitsobotka6268
    @vitsobotka6268 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey I ve seen this one!
    What do you mean you ve seen this one? Its completely new

  • @PatriciaFreddy
    @PatriciaFreddy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    China: We have made a two seat J-20 stealth fighter.
    USA: That design is stolen from us.
    China: But you dont have a two seat stealth fighter.
    USA: Exactly! you stole it from us and now we dont have it.

  • @victorhuynh4031
    @victorhuynh4031 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    US spent trillions for f35, China spent couple billions for j35, China still have money left to continously build up China high-speed train.

    • @jonasbarbery7193
      @jonasbarbery7193 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The j 20 was their golden child a couple of years ago never did work the problems out. Maybe this is a great leap forward, or just another sheep in wolf's clothing

    • @z5170
      @z5170 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      but its toys unlike f22 and f35

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @fuckyoutubepolicy staff no. the stealth coating technology was likely stolen by china in the F35 hack along with sensor fusion technology.

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't forget do you know, once China fully developed the GPS jamming system, alone its door steps and in SCS and NCS all those F-35, or even higher number will be useless ---- a blind leading a blind. China does has its own GPS system for its fighters.

  • @Lena-vw6ye
    @Lena-vw6ye 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It's the same as high tech products like iPhones / Androids. The phones are all somewhat similar looking nowadays but with a little bit of difference in the interior. I would think China would have to revamp the entire system anyways since it needs to be customized for China's uses and language. The J35 probably has very little similarities other than a few visual ones. The types of weapons they use, and the engine itself that will most likely be fitted by a domestic version since they are confident enough in their domestic engines to put the WS10 in the J20.

    • @charleyarchuleta4932
      @charleyarchuleta4932 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      😍🌹 you are a total diamond 💎

    • @ramazankokur650
      @ramazankokur650 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      😃😍🌹@Lena they are technologically doing a very great design and innovation, they are making it the most modern technology and i have read reports of the pentagon, that china has surpassed the cyber technology of the usa , and soon the military technology of the usa, then they will be superpower around 2049, there is a book of china 2049 the superpower, then there will be a liberty statue in beijing in china where the new superpower will rise in the world, then the world citizens will be going to pay in yuan, you are a completely total kristal diamond 💎

    • @charleyarchuleta4932
      @charleyarchuleta4932 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All these metrics that these theories are based on have their foundation in yesterdays numbers. The world has started the great decoupling from China on an unimaginable scale. China is now descending extremely fast. They’re hemorrhage is do go their aggressive geopolitical threats to India, Russia, Taiwan, and Australia, to name a few. The world sees China as the new global threat to freedom. Authoritarian socialism “ communism,” is very oppressive. Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, and India will dissect chinas place in the future. China will be maybe a third of what it is now. 🌹❤️🎁

    • @Lena-vw6ye
      @Lena-vw6ye 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charleyarchuleta4932 You know they've been saying that for over 30 years right? It's never rung true. I'm glad you're able to keep believing though, hope you become enlightened in the next 30 years your "theory" hasn't rung true.

    • @charleyarchuleta4932
      @charleyarchuleta4932 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lena-vw6ye never heard that till
      Just recently. China was an unhindered ascension

  • @alwynlvv5429
    @alwynlvv5429 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People seems forget the most important components in a aircraft are the engine and radar, both cannot be stolen, or even you stolen all the components and data, you still cannot build it, you need the equipments and the engineers.

    • @user-hj8mz3hp3s
      @user-hj8mz3hp3s 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      China gives money to french and russian sceintists and they make them all of this stuff.China has been doing that fore more than five years even some from usa

  • @msmistro5725
    @msmistro5725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks like China also likes how the F-22 looks. However there is a lot more much more to that plane than what can me seen.

    • @bjl7938
      @bjl7938 ปีที่แล้ว

      F-22确实好看

  • @zhuangcorp
    @zhuangcorp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    China doesnt have the same power projection aspirations as the US because of the enormous costs. I think their strategy is to use J-35 in combination with J15 and J16 4th gen planes to operate specific regional missions, but not to compete head on with the US navy. In almost every way, F-35 is complete overkill for the US navy, and a big waste of money actually.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      F35s are partially intented for ground attack missions in contested airspace. China doesn't plan to invade anyone except with the possibility of Taiwan. And ground attack there can be done with long range artillery.

    • @georgepantazis141
      @georgepantazis141 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bullshit,CCP rubbish
      🇭🇲🇺🇲🇬🇧🇨🇦🇳🇱🇯🇵🇰🇷🇩🇪

    • @guruxara7994
      @guruxara7994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The US is wasting money...

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't forget do you know, once China fully developed the GPS jamming system, alone its door steps and in SCS and NCS all those F-35, or even higher number will be useless ---- a blind leading a blind. China does has its own GPS system for its fighters.

    • @zenpai5998
      @zenpai5998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@g.l.9517 okay so the US can do the exact same thing in turn 😂😂😂 the US will have a six generation fighter soon anyway

  • @lil----lil
    @lil----lil 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I will say this. Stealing or "copying" is one thing, but to "build" something from that information is a COMPLETELY different matter - if you don't understand how the engineering "principles" of something that works, it ain't happening. You can go out and buy a car engine and take it apart, BUT there is NOT WAY you gonna build one if you don't understand how it works. It is indeed a mystery how they moved so fast. THEY HIRED foreigner engineers and paid them BIG MONEY??????? It makes sense.

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't forget do you know, once China fully developed the GPS jamming system, alone its door steps and in SCS and NCS all those F-35, or even higher number will be useless ---- a blind leading a blind. China does has its own GPS system for its fighters.

  • @london6580
    @london6580 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That looks very familiar…wonder where they came up with that. I think they used tracing paper

  • @pulsatingsausageboy2076
    @pulsatingsausageboy2076 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can hardly call what China has a carrier. It’s more like a half a carrier. 😂

  • @mcdtropicalfishandaquarium8993
    @mcdtropicalfishandaquarium8993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Though the Chinese Navy may be the largest at the moment most of its vessels are not capable of sailing beyond the South China Sea. Not to mention that their Navy isn't battle tested. The battle hardened US Navy on the other may be slightly smaller than China's but is far more powerful and better funded. Which brings us to Naval Aviation the J-35 maybe newer but once again the Chinese have yet test land it on a moving ship. Where as the US's F-35 has already been tested is far more maneuverable than its elongated Chinese copy.

    • @wolverine9377
      @wolverine9377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      America thought similarly in Korean war.
      And we know what happened

    • @mcdtropicalfishandaquarium8993
      @mcdtropicalfishandaquarium8993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@wolverine9377 We forced the Cease fire in Korea. And that was after both sides fought eachother to a stalemate.

    • @wolverine9377
      @wolverine9377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mcdtropicalfishandaquarium8993 lol, pal did you forgot how America and whole UN got chased away from yalu river to the Seoul by Chinese with shitty weapons?

    • @mcdtropicalfishandaquarium8993
      @mcdtropicalfishandaquarium8993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wolverine9377 That's only cause we didn't plan on them getting involved. We eventually got our shit together and pushed the Chinese back across the yalu river.

    • @wolverine9377
      @wolverine9377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mcdtropicalfishandaquarium8993
      Haha nope pal,
      Once Chinese people got involved in that war,
      Whole UN and American were chased out of north Korean border and the remaining war was on the border of north and south.
      UN and American can't do a shit at that time and cease fire was declared.
      Go read more

  • @nasmurph5453
    @nasmurph5453 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    wow, if they wanna steal and copy at least use a different number ..

  • @kan7836
    @kan7836 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where did China steal the hypersonic cruise missile technology, the us had just failed it’s last attempt developing their own!

  • @benganchan1420
    @benganchan1420 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    When j20,j35,f22,f35 meets bird as in bird strike , it’s goodbye to plane, pilot, bird

  • @dodoubleg2356
    @dodoubleg2356 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The J-35 evokes 1 thought..."Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery," ha. Why don't they just call it the F-22 2.0?? 🤔😂

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Because it is not complete imitation? There are dominator technologies involved, technologies that were better than the decade old F-22 tech.
      F-22 is a engineering marvel for its time and father of modern stealth fighter designs.
      Everyone holds a healthy amount of respect for F-22 but to overlook newer stealth fighters due to necessary visual similarities is a big mistake.

    • @namelessking8905
      @namelessking8905 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thomaszhang3101 - Why should the US worry about a country that copies planes that are over 20 years old now?

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@namelessking8905 idk man, US Department of Defense called Russia a temporary problem that they will contain and wait for it to go away, but they labeled China a “civilization challenge” that can seriously threaten US’s position in the world.
      Why were they so paranoid with such a backward country that can do nothing to copy? Idk, it’s not like China can make 5G, quantum computing, and hypersonic missile before the US can.

    • @namelessking8905
      @namelessking8905 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@thomaszhang3101 - China is not the first with either of those. In fact US based companies were. And yes the US does have hyper-sonic missiles. And as for the threats the US military is reporting. They will not get any funding if they say everything is great now would they?

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@namelessking8905 does US have 5G right now? Has US, no, has any country besides China successfully tested their hypersonic glide vehicle yet?
      Does US have quantum computing and particle
      radar that detects stealth aircraft? I’ve only seen China shown it.
      Ah, US DOT is trying to get funding isn’t it? Every single expert in Royal United Service Institute shares the view because, hmm, they want US DOT to get funding? What do they get out of it? Oh, and everyone in Asia is militarized fast with Japan building 2 quasi-carriers and Korea planning on 1, because they can sit back and count on America protecting them from no threat at all?

  • @christianreyquisto3163
    @christianreyquisto3163 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Comparing J-35 to F-22 and F-35 is like comparing Sinovac to Pfizer and Moderna.

    • @adrianoon1127
      @adrianoon1127 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sinovac is good tho

    • @aairaabraham
      @aairaabraham 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adrianoon1127 Indonesia want 3rd done only pfizer and moderna tho😂

    • @LingJunZhang
      @LingJunZhang 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aairaabraham so Indonesia is good tho

  • @BVaishnavChole
    @BVaishnavChole 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Noo you cannot operate a 5th generation aircraft as standard aircraft on battleships it's not a mature technology economically and also limited payload you can use them as support aircrafts so don't worry

  • @riceman2821
    @riceman2821 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The weak copy the strong but when your the strongest, you don’t got nobody to copy from

  • @wogelson
    @wogelson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Keep up the good quality content

  • @litchi4507
    @litchi4507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The main difference between the two is the US F35 is single engine while the Chinese J35 is twin engines.

    • @georgepantazis141
      @georgepantazis141 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The f35is real a great.Ccp35 sucks ass and is fake paper plane

    • @taichitao85
      @taichitao85 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@georgepantazis141 butt hur much

    • @capitalism2096
      @capitalism2096 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      its also believed to be longer and heavier.
      (but the F35 is already heavy enough, in China becuz of its appearance people often call it "ball lightning" instead of "lightning", so are they going to make it heavier?)

  • @Legendaryboy98
    @Legendaryboy98 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All these kids going ”bUt ChInA CoPies EvEryThiNg” yeah no shit they do. Why would they spend billions on designing completely unique weapons when they can take the shortcut and copy something the US has already spent 1,5 trillion dollars designing. They save both time, effort and a fuck ton of money and resorces.

    • @yuluoxianjun
      @yuluoxianjun 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      maybe usa is rich,lol

    • @Legendaryboy98
      @Legendaryboy98 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yuluoxianjun Rich? Yes. Is the US dumb as fuck however? Absolutely.

  • @michelwitzik1574
    @michelwitzik1574 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is half of the video about F35 again..??

  • @Zaidk545
    @Zaidk545 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hmm I have totally not noticed that the F35 has been put into a printer and and come out as the low quality made in China J35.

  • @gaganshetty114
    @gaganshetty114 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's Chinese It will work till evening 😂

  • @pinonnut
    @pinonnut ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who stole all our tech! Hunter!? Really! For 12 pieces of silver?

  • @CrotchRocket78
    @CrotchRocket78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To be fair, it would would make a better carrier plane with 2 engines versus the F35 with one.

    • @yukin1990
      @yukin1990 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But those chinese engine will be having same operating time as the Russian one....unless P&W Canada helping them ...

    • @CrotchRocket78
      @CrotchRocket78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yukin1990 oh i know, i mwant the F35 really needed 2 engines.

    • @yukin1990
      @yukin1990 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrotchRocket78 yeah .....would like to see a twin engines VTOL F-35B XD

  • @WycliffStudios
    @WycliffStudios 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That is a blatant copy of F22 and F35

  • @MrLuisfrossi
    @MrLuisfrossi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Military TV: How dis China developed the J-35 so fast?
    PLA: The Secret Ingredient is Crime

  • @suryapratamak1690
    @suryapratamak1690 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    woowww, so original and innovative..

    • @homelessmoon
      @homelessmoon ปีที่แล้ว

      Just as you Indians are haha

  • @marlonsong9280
    @marlonsong9280 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, at least someone put the 325 billion F35 research data into use

  • @ChosenOne9387
    @ChosenOne9387 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Copy of F-35/F-22? But made in China 😂🤣

  • @EnigmaG
    @EnigmaG 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    China and America have different military doctrines, strategies and overall objectives. America is focused on offensive capabilities, while china is on defensive. America is trying to maintain its dominance all over the world, while china is tying to strengthen its sphere of influence in nearby regions. China knows it is incredibly hard to outmatch american military hardware and capabilities, given decades of head start america enjoys, hence they are not even trying to make something better than America's top millitary gear. All china needs is to have just enough deterrence to make america suffer unacceptable losses if a war ever occurs with china.

  • @jerryf01201
    @jerryf01201 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This fighter names FC-31 which is designed for the oversea market

    • @orlock20
      @orlock20 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So who would by the aircraft? China "buys" them for $70 million each.