I especially love that whenever TH-camrs put pictures of climate change on the screen, they decide to show nuclear power plants, which, granted, make a lot of smoke, but it's just water vapor. They might have the problem of nuclear waste, but they still have nothing to do with climate change
Nuclear has a bad name because of shitty Soviet technicians and a particularly dimwitted decision to build a nuclear reactor right next to the ocean. And then put the safety systems below sea level, including the backup generators. On an island with an immense amount of seismic activities. *surprised pikachu face* New reactors, such as the CANDU, even help solve conventional nuclear waste issues, as it can use it as it's primary fuel. It also doesn't require enriching at all for it's normal fuel. Nuclear has so much potential, but uneducated implementation has nearly ruined it for everyone.
@@dovid916 Mind you, it's not just „Shitty soviet technicians“ Firstly, those people were highly qualified engeneers for their time, and tschernobyl was mostly caused because of overseers not knowing how far you could push the plant. The united states fueled the disaster just as much as the soviet union did, by prioritizing the production of nuclear weapons over efficiency and safety. If they strained their plants to the maximum, so would the ussr, and pushing it to the maximum they did.
@@sehr.geheim bruh in the Soviet union highly qualified generally meant highly loyal to the state, Infact, the guy in charge of keeping the reactor running didn't follow standard safety procedures and tried to speed run the whole safety test so that electric supply to Keiv wouldn't be cut and he wouldn't be fired for causing the power cut
Especially when they show a video of the Sahara being a desert and then becoming green and then going back to a desert.. but this time it went back to how it was.. because of climate change caused by people. Lol.. rightttttttt
Yeah 😂 But the principal problem in Africa isn't rain... it's the capacity to the soil to absorb water.... because many water are in the surface and create floods, or disappear in the air.
Eritrea was at war with Ethiopia until late 2018 and seeing as the African Union is headquartered in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia I'm assuming that has something to do with it. Whether they will eventually contribute to the project remains to be seen I suppose.
Not just Eritrea but also Ethiopia Let me explain the curve bend towards central Ethiopia because the northern part of the country (Tigrai region) is a full desert therefore the tree wall must divide Northern Ethiopia combined with Eritrea from the remaining part of the country. Edit: I'm also from Ethiopia
Nope, I was about to question this, too! I don't know which is correct, but, without searching for, I guess there are millions, not billions, mostly because I doubt the Earth reach even one billion km².
Video makers need to stop showing stock footage of nuclear power plants when discussing the challenges of climate change. That's water vapor you're showing and it doesn't add to CO2 emissions.
Yes and the irony is that the nuclear is one, if not the one, sector that emits the less co2. Coal or Oil powerplants are desastrous in co2 emissions and fine particules, solar and wind, extremely poluting to produce and we can't really recycle any of them. Dams use so many ressources to build and desastrous for the biodiversity. The only one that's better than nuclear fission centrals is geothermal centrals. (but can't be built everywhere, needs very specific conditions) The best option would be nuclear fusion. Using "rare" (1 part per 3000 if i remember correctly) isotopes of water to create 10 times the energy used for the reaction. What dangerous chemicals does it release then ? Dihydrogen Monoxyde : H2O. Also known as water. Nothing more. No radioactive materials for millenials, no way-more dangerous fine particules (like coal and oil powerplant does), Anything but water. So stop making nuclear sector look bad. It is one of the best, and its future is even greater.
@@Karriefy23 did you account for the extraction of rare earth elements that need toxic acids and render huge areas inhospitable for life ? Because they're used for both solar and wind, moreover in the batteries needed for such power plants to work. Batteries that are desastrous environnementally. And that we can't recycle neither solar panels (that start piling up in third world countries, contaminating soil and waterbeds) nor wind turbines. I won't even reply about what you've said about nuclear powerplant would account for 30% of the air pollution.
it's not 8 billion! It's 8 billion for the actual project but you need another 800 billion to pad the pockets of corrupt official to make it happen. Back in the 90's after a really bad flooding in Bangladesh, the gov't issued USD $60 per effected family to replant crops but by the time the families got that money it was only 2 cent. rest of the money is in the pocket of everyone involve (with the distribution of the funds) taking a cut.
@@Calle19881 in a desert, there a season where the wind blows from inland towards the coast. The air heating up as it blows over the hot desert. When you open your front door it's literally like opening an oven door. The air not just picking up heat, but sand as well. And when the stars alighn, it rains during all this. Once I experienced weather when it rained hot mud. Whatever this season is called, it's coming.
@the virtuous man maybe on the south that’s for sure I agree that Sahara caused us way to many problems (wish include weather and climate change rising temperatures) the northern Mediterranean part is not affected but we should plant something to stop its progression not only for safety but for climate and agricultural purposes
"The estimated cost of constructing such a titanic structure-" Oh boy, it's going to be some absurd number I can't even fathom, isn't it? "- is believed to be around 8 billion dollars" ... That's it? I don't know, but after hearing the ludicrous numbers being raised by countries to sustain their country's companies during this pandemic, 8 billion dollars sounds like a drop in the bucket.
The real problem is not the money, but the LOCAL manpower (you can not drop "genesis bombs" to magically alter the ground & insert the trees). -> The LONG (time) logistics necesary to sustain all of the "micro-branches" of the megaproject on each individual region (county_level) are difficult to organize, mantain & efectively acomplish (even without tribal wars & simple incompetency murking things).
I think rather than funding the biggest challenge is the fact that the countries in the Sahel aren't particularly stable and lack proper government machinery to undertake such a massive project, aside from all the corruption plaguing to the region. Like the countries which have contributed the most like Senegal, Ethiopia and Nigeria despite their internal challenges are the ones who are more well off when compared to the other countries in the region.
@@thelakeman2538 And don't forget that there's an Islamist insurgency (Nigeria, Niger, Mali, Chad and Burkina Faso) plus ongoing conflict in the Darfur region of Sudan. Plus ongoing conflicts between pastoralists and farmers etc.... The one crucial country is Nigeria, due to the size of its population and economy: if its government were to take the lead it would encourage the others to cooperate and carry out the necessary program without much fuss. And somewhere in the multiverse, there exists a stable, competent and incorruptible Nigerian state, that is capable of this task, as opposed to the Nigerian government of our universe, which doesn't give fuck all about anything other than lining their pockets in a nonstop kleptocratic orgy. So yeah, its doomed.
@@sebbo_h7121 Barely. You could probably count the number of times he has done that on a single hand. I'm saying he dosnt use the glorious measurement of a Toyota Corolla enough to justify being a meme.
At 3:21 he says that the Sahara Desert covers over “9.2 million km” while on screen it shows “9.2 billion km”. This is either a typo or a voiceover mistake. Just wanted to point this out.
@@XR190190 who do you think mined the rare minerals used to make the phone/computer you wrote this with? but you're correct, child labour is heinous... but the current 135,000,000 inhabitants? are they all toddlers? that's about the same pop. as Russia... trying to tell me they cant find a needle of manpower in that haystack?
@@dylwhite8831 FYI 50% of those 135 000 000 inhabitants are under 14. You can check on the UN stats. Now don't forget that these people don't have any means of going to the trees sites. No roads, not much car/truck like in developed countries. It's a different logistic !
@@XR190190 why would that matter? toddlers cant drive... but again, im not here to solve multiple nations infrastructure problems, just pointing out there is a huge population and that 'triple in size' wont just be births:deaths but also immigration. maybe the government, knowing its in danger, should priorities money and labour distribution... countries like Spain and Australia are often in drought and have put money into desalination plants for their future water consumption.
@@isetta4083 not politically though They are behind in that domain compared to it's neighboring country Tunisia but at least Algeria didn't mess up as badly as Libya did
@@mohamedelhediissa289 definitely, they could really benefit from some democracy or some more political influence from people who aren't rich guys over the age of 70
The Sahara has been exponentially increasing in size for 3,000 years. It's already started reaching the asteroid belt. You didn't know because you've been living inside the Truman Show for your entire life.
@S E P Or the countries around it are too disorganized, as they have always been. But it's easy to never put ourselves in question when all we have to do is blaming others, the west in particular, about basically anything that is wrong in Africa.
@S E P I was talking in general, not in this thread specifically. In every video talking about africa, there are a lot of comments like that, including in the comment section of this video here.
@@xenotypos i understand what youre saying, but historically, Europe has a lot to answer for a lot of the issues Africans face. I agree guilt and shame doesnt help anything, but reparations will. But knowing this political climate, white liberals will hijack this train of thought.
@@cia3058 but without europe 90% of Africa would still be in the stone age/ the arabs would have colonized later anyway. Africa was almost left untouched by colonization and many africans didn't even see an european. Obviously many atrocities were commited, like during leopold of belgium reign, but after his death belgium actually threated natives well
Congratulations on your anniversary. This is the first of your videos I have seen (recommend by YT), great video and topic. It is very concerning to see how the predicted population explosion in Africa, along with temperature rise, less fresh water, less agricultural land, it doesn't bode well for the children born today in the continent of Africa.
@@Hjernespreng Just replying to your comment growth was mostly to the south..... There is litle land to the west, Almost none to the North, and not that much to the East. Its a map thing that you state the obvious that growth has mostly been to the south .....
@Patrick Swan North and West has mountain ranges which blocks the desert (Atlas Mountains) North and East is desert all the way to the sea and south is also the directions wind blows most of he year
To be fair it’s not entirely their fault. European empires left them with independence but divided the land along lines that benefited them not the locals and made it harder for the new governments to actually govern their new subject regardless if they were republics or not. European colonies were also often sucked dry before they became independent. And were so petty they often destroyed their own infrastructure before leaving so that the locals could never become a super power contender of their own. African nations have access to some of the most fertile resource centers on earth. However, their forced to make uneven trades with the world because they don’t have the skilled workers necessary to actually extract the resources or the infrastructure to actually produce it themselves
@@bruhz_089 it’s not as simple as that. Even if they did most of these nations are already running unstable regions each with their own unique problems. Ranging from ethnic turf wars to drought and famine issues. While other places are prospering but still suffering from wealth inequality. Also what country would give up their land willingly to another solely on the premise that one side would get benefits the other one could use as leverage for political influence around the world. It’s even worse that a lot of these nations don’t have the infrastructure to make skilled workers fast enough because their educational systems simply didn’t receive any investment when they were still colonies. For example much of what was once French Africa. Is still dependent on French intervention because they destroyed all the schools and factories when they left so that the governments couldn’t produce resources without their help. And in an act of desperation many nations ended up making horrible deals with foreign powers like China to rebuild their economies. However, many of these deals are debt traps designed to conquer the very regions the governments are trying to save.
The US has been the number 1 oil producer for awhile. Since the US developed fracking we dont need oil from anyone. We are a net exporter. Biden may change that...empowering lots of bad places. But we will see.
@@swargpatel7634 I was kidding. Though there are a lot of really dumb people in this world so I guess that level of stupidity I was feigning was believable.
8 billion is basically nothing for most industrialized countries... Germany for example now pays 40 billion to shut down coal plants until 2038. Or in other words this money is needed to keep the coal plants going until then because they are already making losses :/
@@admiralkipper4540 it does... It destabalizes countries, which can fuel war and terrorism. Terrorists doing stuff in America is be a concept you should be familiar with. Despite that the US is one of the biggest contributers to climate change, which directly makes America partially resposible!
blueBeanieboos TV are you familiar with the term “Carrying capacity?” A population can only grow if resources are in excess. If there is not enough resources in a certain area, then the population cannot grow. That’s why humanitarian crises such as drought, famine, and disease occur.
2:05 Love how all of Australia is shaded, even the parts that aren’t desert Edit: Just realised Tasmania isn’t on the map he used, which, as an Aussie, is fucking hilarious
I can't believe I've never heard of this before and what a great project! So many great benefits and we really should be planting as many trees as we can to makeup for all the deforestation going on all over the world
Like many others, you made the mistake of showing nuclear plant steam as an example of pollution. It's just water steam, not CO2 emissions. They're a great example of clean energy.
@@AugustJayGames There is a tiny amount of radioactive waste. The problem is that you can't safely store it. Also, it's not fair to compare nuclear to no nuclear, you need to compare it to other power generation methods. And then nuclear scores above average, how close to the top it is depends on what you prioritize. If you aim for lowest CO2 emission per kWh, then nuclear beats everyone. If you aim for shortest term pollution then burning wood cut from a well managed forest wins. If you aim for lowest cost then burning coal wins. If you aim for lowest construction costs, then nuclear is the worst option there is. If you aim for lowest water use, then I think solar is the best option.
@@bramvanduijn8086 I'm aware of the strengths and weaknesses you've listed. I only said there is waste and not on the form of steam like the person said. Also thousands of tons of waste is generated a year. I wouldn't call it small.
@@AugustJayGames Cool, then we are mostly in agreement. I completely agree that the steam is an bad picture to use as a symbol of waste. I just remembered that the cooling water is still warm when it leaves the plant, so that should count as waste too since it affects the place it is released negatively. So I agree, nuclear does have quite a bit of waste. Still... less harmful than coal.
@@AugustJayGames Have you even considered that this "waste" could be refined to be used elsewhere ? Technology have quite progressed on the matter and would even go faster if the public didn't have such a bad opinion on nuclear. Plus people often think nuclear plant = radioactivity = cancer to people around. Yet there are so many more cancers cause by coal and/or fuel powerplants. (300x more iirc) So it's quite ironical to see Germany stopping nuclear powerplants (that could have still worked for few decades. the cost of building is already done and all the infrastructures that has been in contact will be considered nuclear waste to be stocked so why not use it fully to have the best efficiency ?!) to replace them with coal powerplants, so + economic costs to build, + release of Co2 in the atmosphere, + release of fine particules that'll make people sicks. And yet they congratule themselves for doing that for the planet, being so much ecological and safe for populations.....
Every animal and plant species copulate at times of uncertainty. Guess you never heard about the baby boom in America after the world wars. It gives a greater chance for your genetic offspring to live on. Once Africa solves hunger and infrastructure issues it has enough land to support 8 billion people, you can fit China and India in Africa and still have space for the US and the entire UK with space left over, so I'm interested to see Africa become the most diverse continent in History even though it kinda already is.
@@theoligarchstepper Key word there is after. And ya if Africa can solve its greatest issues than it would be able to support its population but those are very difficult tasks to accomplish. Hope the continent can but hope shouldn't replace a pragmatic view of the situation.
@@benjamin7871 Keyword isn't after at all you can't anticipate war and uncertainty you can only react after it happens, the baby boomers were born after both world wars and the great depression that didn't excuse them from war. All of them were born during the Korean wars and most likely served in the Vietnam and Cold war, all periods of uncertainty, this is just America so people can understand it happens to all humans. Other people are dealt in heavier hand being that they fall into the sphere of influence of regional powers. The only reason there's no country in Africa on par with Europe or Asia is that their Navy's weren't advanced enough to defend the coast and they had no knowledge of gun powder. Great Zimbabwe for example was past the iron age when encountered by the Portuguese who just destroyed the whole city from the shore using cannon fire, raided the city of its resources, and later renamed it Rhodesia and told people Asain's built the city, not native Africans. Only a fool thinks their government tells them the truth.
@@theoligarchstepper I'd argue that there is a lot of other factors and uncertainty has lead to both rises and falls in population. Your not wrong that it didn't excuse them from war but just as you pointed out "you can't anticipate war". Some were born during the Korean war but it lasted 3 years not 18 like the baby boomers generation did, so no all were not born during it. Plus it was a tenth of the size of WW2. The Vietnam war would be a great example except for the fact that it literally happened the year after the baby boomer generation ended, weird how that happened huh? Africa being colonized is due to a multitude of factors like infighting between countries, European medical advancements, and political instability. While European weapons were more advanced and definitely played a factor keep in mind that most of non coastal Africa wasn't colonized until 1880; most had access to guns and gunpowder. The times that European powers successfully colonized just about anywhere, it heavily relied on divide and conquer tacits or they just got lucky with their timing. All of this isn't to say Africa can't or won't rise just that it still faces some great challenges.
Happy 5 years. Keep up the good work, you make one of the most unique and amazing videos on youtube. Looking forward to see what ideas you come up with for the future.
Fencing off areas and not allowing animals in does not rebuild the soil. Multi-pattern grazing is what rebuilds soil. Having tons of animals on a small portion of land and moving them frequently what puts organic material back into the soil.
@@rutvikk. Hey, I have the perfect solution. How about we all nuke ourselves? If everyone is dead, there is no one left to complain, which means that all problems are solved for an infinite amount of time. It's perfect (:
To be fair it would probably mainly look just the same as today, albeit a bit further north. The wall of trees will increase vegetation coverage south of it so you wouldn't really be able to see where the wall was actually created.
@@jaouad_h "The Great Library of Alexandria was one of the most significant libraries during ancient times" that doesn't count because it was built by the Greeks
I love this video and project so much and really appreciate your awesome works! Unfortunately I only found an ad link and no sources referring to your content. Please share your sources with us. :-)
SUPRISE! I am the funniest YTer evah!!!! Just kidding, it was no surprise. Everybody knew already. HAHAHHAHA!!!! That was an amazing joke (it was real talk though). WAWAWAWAWA!!!! Good afternoon, dear agam
There has been a 20% increase in the greening of the earth due to the rise in CO2, according to NASA. NASA's maps show quite the increase in greening around the edges of the Sahara
If we're thinking of the same guy, that's just permaculture. A great idea, but not all that effective in reclaiming land, more so in re-fertilizing _almost_ eroded land. However, a South African professor is experimenting with mimicking the migration patterns of great herds from pre-historic times. Moving a shit ton of cattle over a huge area is a fantastic way to create enough ecosystems on the micro scale that you eventually end up with "re-greened" regions on the macro scale. The key is that they desperately need to be moved regularly, and over a large area, or they would simply lead to more soil degradation. Such an undertaking is difficult on a large scale, and has to be _very_ carefully managed by a central body not driven by profits in order to succeed. The chances of a non-capitalist solution to climate change continue to be frighteningly low.
@@TheNinetySecond" If we're thinking of the same guy, that's just permaculture. " if you search on youtube for Greening the desert, you will what iva lindsay means. its a project in jordan( one of the most arid places inthe world), and think that just planting trees is useless( china did this and it failed) because you have to grown an eco system that is capable of sustaining itself ( hence permaculture).
ID also like to point out to people this one very crucial fact: SOIL HEALTH makes most of the world completely useless by using the rather damaging method of single crop farming and also using materials which leak into damage the soil. Seriously people look it up and if you can do simple things in your area that might help!
Absolutely love your channel and your content. You are so educational. Would you consider making a part 2 to this African great green wall video going more in depth into the science and logistics of how this is actually accomplished? For example, what kind of trees are planted, where are they planted, how do they get water, and what is the expectation that it will actually work? Thanks so much!
USA uses both. The cars sitting in my driveway I don't think have even one SAE bolt on them. My first car in the 1970s was mostly SAE. One in a while I'd find a metric. Aircraft on the other hand are usually SAE.
Most people in the US use some Metric, mainly millimeters for things like tools and ammunition and liters for some liquids, but in all honesty a lot of people are genuinely resentful of the spite and venom presented by those that make fun of the United States for sticking with the imperial system even though it was around before the metric system and it works just fine.
It's a dream scenario made up by corrupt project leads. There's no way such a big project would cost eight billion dollars... Even if you enforced slave labour.
@@RealCadde And what if it's the double of that? The US bought an aircraft carrier for literally a trillion dollars if I remember correctly. Does the cost even matter in scenarios like this?
@@gyurto If the cost doesn't matter then feel free to contribute to the project. Also, a trillion dollar aircraft carrier is paid with taxes. If those paying taxes don't like it they can... You know... Move to Africa? ... Oh wait, the GDP of the US is about 20 trillion. The GDP of the entirety of Africa is 2.6 trillion. The population of the US is 328 million. The population of Africa is 1.3 billion. The GDP per capita in the US is $63,000 The GDP per capita in Africa is $1,970 IF we flipped some numbers around and gave Africa the GDP per capita of the US, their GDP would have been ~250 trillion. Yet... Africa spends most of its time breeding and warring. Meanwhile, the US invests in its national security because it has already got most of its other grounds covered. And no, Africa is not a poor land. They have PLENTY of untapped resources, if only they could get their shit together and stop breeding and fighting each other. But hey, since cost doesn't matter. I assume you've already bought a ticket and a bunch of trees to plant them yourself using your own hard labor to do so... ... Or maybe you are sitting behind a keyboard.
@@gyurto You remember extremely incorrectly.. If you're talking about the USS Gerald R. Ford, then you're so far off you must be getting your 'facts' from the onion... R&D was somewhere around $5 billion, cost per unit is $12.8 billion.. 2 ordered, 2 completed, 10 ordered. Also Cadde is right. That price tag of $8 billion has to be off. That might be the price for the _seeds_ only.
@@SharpWits2013 Yes you are right, I was way off it was only 13 billion dollar yes. Still even if the project needs 30 billion dollars it is worth it.
Fun fact: the Sahara has records amounts of rainfall in the last decades and is actually become more wet even tough it's expanding . This is the result of warmer oceans which gives more rain. Let's hope this will continue !
The problem is partially that the soil in the Sahara has become degraded sand which cannot hold any water. The water immediately collects and flows out the Sahara in the form of a flood (which is why people sometimes drown in deserts). Just rain isn't enough, the water also has to stay in the region. In normal soil this happens naturally, but if you want to restore the Sahara you will first have to plant some specific shrubs which can hold water and survive in the desert (which is non-trivial), so that then other plants can grow with that water, their roots can enhance the soil, etc.
It always amazes me how we can build machines that kill so easily…but when it comes to invest developing infrastructure for good it always gets forgotten.
It would be great if u could add sources to your video. In my opinions they are missing and are almost mandatory in the times we are today. Otherweise your videos are great!
Human beings coming together while Google is running the planet I don't think so . Their business model is creating hate and different groups so they can make money out of credit while people are arguing
The Sahara used to be a green savanna-like land with rivers and lakes around 10000 years ago. So stopping the Sahara is next to impossible. Another issue is heavy water use. With the growing population, water use can be reduced, but never stopped. Hopefully brought into check.
I don't understand how it could cost that much and take long with such a large population of unemployed and potentially starving people, wouldn't there be incredible demand for labour in such areas?
@@kuto0987 that could be true, your picture says your likely Canadian as well. I know we plant as many trees as we cut down for the most part so that's what I was basing my logic on our ability to mass plant saplings
@@sammysedore True but there is much more to consider when planting trees from scratch on that level in an area as unstable as Africa. I get what you are saying though.
![ประสบการณ์ จ้าง Developer ที่ผมจะไม่มีวันลืม [ภาค2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pZbsSDRrmXA/mqdefault.jpg)
"one of the premium lakes in the area: lake Chad"
of course
Chad lake Chad vs Virgin every other lake in the world
Chad
CHAD GANG
@@MagmaCalibur is it even a competition?
Ofc it’s chad.
Did you know that in prehistoric time Lake Chad was enormous? It was call Mega Chad.
Fun fact: At one point in human history, Lake Chad was larger then the Caspian sea.
funny
chad got old and lost it all to drugs
The Virgin Caspian Sea
@@yoosufsayyid5733 chad got bored of being the greatest so it retired
Funnily enough, they named this larger Lake Chad, "Mega-Chad".
Next video on Wendover:
The Logistics of Airports in the Desert
First comment!
@@definetlycringe5379 6 years ago? Wait......
@@oscario9405 its a joke
@@moises3545 I was responding to the joke, with a joke
awkward thread..
Lake Chad is shrunk so much that they have renamed it the Virgin Lake
lol
Get it because the lake doesn’t get water 💦
underrated
@@levinkeryhell3396 Its only been 45 minutes since he commented, give it time
Chad becomes Virgin Islands
I especially love that whenever TH-camrs put pictures of climate change on the screen, they decide to show nuclear power plants, which, granted, make a lot of smoke, but it's just water vapor. They might have the problem of nuclear waste, but they still have nothing to do with climate change
Works better for propaganda
Nuclear has a bad name because of shitty Soviet technicians and a particularly dimwitted decision to build a nuclear reactor right next to the ocean. And then put the safety systems below sea level, including the backup generators. On an island with an immense amount of seismic activities. *surprised pikachu face*
New reactors, such as the CANDU, even help solve conventional nuclear waste issues, as it can use it as it's primary fuel. It also doesn't require enriching at all for it's normal fuel.
Nuclear has so much potential, but uneducated implementation has nearly ruined it for everyone.
@@dovid916 Mind you, it's not just „Shitty soviet technicians“
Firstly, those people were highly qualified engeneers for their time, and tschernobyl was mostly caused because of overseers not knowing how far you could push the plant.
The united states fueled the disaster just as much as the soviet union did, by prioritizing the production of nuclear weapons over efficiency and safety. If they strained their plants to the maximum, so would the ussr, and pushing it to the maximum they did.
@@sehr.geheim bruh in the Soviet union highly qualified generally meant highly loyal to the state, Infact, the guy in charge of keeping the reactor running didn't follow standard safety procedures and tried to speed run the whole safety test so that electric supply to Keiv wouldn't be cut and he wouldn't be fired for causing the power cut
Especially when they show a video of the Sahara being a desert and then becoming green and then going back to a desert.. but this time it went back to how it was.. because of climate change caused by people. Lol.. rightttttttt
So basically we need Toto to bless the rains down in Africa.
Lol
Æfrica
Gonna take some time to do the things we never had
If I die and go to hell that song and any U2 song will be on loud speakers
Yeah 😂
But the principal problem in Africa isn't rain... it's the capacity to the soil to absorb water.... because many water are in the surface and create floods, or disappear in the air.
I like how theres a curve to the eastern edge that avoids where Eritrea is
yeh why is that?
Eritrea was at war with Ethiopia until late 2018 and seeing as the African Union is headquartered in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia I'm assuming that has something to do with it. Whether they will eventually contribute to the project remains to be seen I suppose.
Not just Eritrea but also Ethiopia Let me explain the curve bend towards central Ethiopia because the northern part of the country (Tigrai region) is a full desert therefore the tree wall must divide Northern Ethiopia combined with Eritrea from the remaining part of the country.
Edit: I'm also from Ethiopia
@@abubeker1704 lol ur delusional not even tplf would allow that
@@abubeker1704 thank you for your input, great to hear from you. From Canada.
3:15 - Am I the only one that noticed that he said 9.2 million when the number on screen was 9,200,000,000?
Nope, I was about to question this, too!
I don't know which is correct, but, without searching for, I guess there are millions, not billions, mostly because I doubt the Earth reach even one billion km².
And Google answered me most quickly than I expected: 9.2 million. =]
Exactly, that number shown is 9.2 billion.
I saw it too - gives a bad impression.
Americans read numbers differently
Video makers need to stop showing stock footage of nuclear power plants when discussing the challenges of climate change. That's water vapor you're showing and it doesn't add to CO2 emissions.
Yes and the irony is that the nuclear is one, if not the one, sector that emits the less co2. Coal or Oil powerplants are desastrous in co2 emissions and fine particules, solar and wind, extremely poluting to produce and we can't really recycle any of them. Dams use so many ressources to build and desastrous for the biodiversity.
The only one that's better than nuclear fission centrals is geothermal centrals. (but can't be built everywhere, needs very specific conditions)
The best option would be nuclear fusion. Using "rare" (1 part per 3000 if i remember correctly) isotopes of water to create 10 times the energy used for the reaction. What dangerous chemicals does it release then ? Dihydrogen Monoxyde : H2O. Also known as water. Nothing more. No radioactive materials for millenials, no way-more dangerous fine particules (like coal and oil powerplant does), Anything but water.
So stop making nuclear sector look bad. It is one of the best, and its future is even greater.
@@Aaronit0 bruh. Its the opposite, nuclear makes 30% of the air pollution. Solar and wind powers makes little or no pollution at all.
@@Aaronit0 woah that is too complicated for my 9 year old brain can pleas simplify
@@Karriefy23 did you account for the extraction of rare earth elements that need toxic acids and render huge areas inhospitable for life ? Because they're used for both solar and wind, moreover in the batteries needed for such power plants to work. Batteries that are desastrous environnementally. And that we can't recycle neither solar panels (that start piling up in third world countries, contaminating soil and waterbeds) nor wind turbines.
I won't even reply about what you've said about nuclear powerplant would account for 30% of the air pollution.
@didthelel wow
*"Every 60 seconds in Africa, a minute passes, together we can stop this phenomenon"*
Yeah um no. I am totally fine without recolonization
@@gojira4036 it’s a joke
I didn’t know that
Thanks Skillshare
@@setlerking yes I know
Every 60 seconds a desert grows in Africa, together we can stop this phenomenon.
I actually laughed when u said 8 billion. that is literally nothing and yet I still feel like it won’t be funded to it’s full capability
it's not 8 billion!
It's 8 billion for the actual project but you need another 800 billion to pad the pockets of corrupt official to make it happen.
Back in the 90's after a really bad flooding in Bangladesh, the gov't issued USD $60 per effected family to replant crops but by the time the families got that money it was only 2 cent.
rest of the money is in the pocket of everyone involve (with the distribution of the funds) taking a cut.
@@AshrakAhmed And did you do something about it? Other than writing about it on TH-cam?
@@punkjesus10887 what the fuck is he gonna do lol
It will be founded and will not be built,. money will be stolen.
The US military budget is like 600 BILLION, just like give 8 to Africa Ez
Only $8 billon dollars
Thsts like a fraction of Jeff Bezos net with
Why not donate some money to it.
@@peterjamesleeching829 because Jeff Bezos doesn’t care
Laughs in elon musk
@@ribos2762 he doesn’t need to donate the money lol, he could easily do it himself.
@@ribos2762 right because you plant trees in foreign countries? What? With that much money he could easily get it done, he just doesn’t care.
People in Central Africa: "Summer is coming."
Double-trouble!
OHHH GOODDDDDDDDDDD
OOOHHHHH NNNNOOOOOO
HAHA! there is only one season along the equator. And it is summer
@@Calle19881 in a desert, there a season where the wind blows from inland towards the coast. The air heating up as it blows over the hot desert. When you open your front door it's literally like opening an oven door.
The air not just picking up heat, but sand as well.
And when the stars alighn, it rains during all this.
Once I experienced weather when it rained hot mud.
Whatever this season is called, it's coming.
@@tylerdurden3722 They call that hell
Thats why most of us in North africa 80% of the population live in the mediterranean part in the north
exactly thank god were not affected by this...what a blessing to be in the mediteranean sea :))
@the virtuous man maybe on the south that’s for sure I agree that Sahara caused us way to many problems (wish include weather and climate change rising temperatures) the northern Mediterranean part is not affected but we should plant something to stop its progression not only for safety but for climate and agricultural purposes
Libya's an excellent example.
Lots of you also live on the other side of the Mediterranean
Africa: "were gonna build a wall, and it's going to be great, the best, its going to be beautiful like... the world has ever seen"
They should make a fundraiser cap that says "Make Africa Great Again"
And Mexico is gonna pay for it
@@user-wm7mk2nt4d Spain
They should just bomb the sahara
We will build a great wall on our northern border and we will have the Sahara pay for that wall.
First half the video makes the picture so gloomy but then the plans and efforts filled me with hope. Bless Africa...
"The estimated cost of constructing such a titanic structure-" Oh boy, it's going to be some absurd number I can't even fathom, isn't it? "- is believed to be around 8 billion dollars"
... That's it? I don't know, but after hearing the ludicrous numbers being raised by countries to sustain their country's companies during this pandemic, 8 billion dollars sounds like a drop in the bucket.
The real problem is not the money, but the LOCAL manpower (you can not drop "genesis bombs" to magically alter the ground & insert the trees).
-> The LONG (time) logistics necesary to sustain all of the "micro-branches" of the megaproject on each individual region (county_level) are difficult to organize, mantain & efectively acomplish (even without tribal wars & simple incompetency murking things).
Cue johnny appleseed
That's every person in the world giving a dollar and a few pennies.
I think rather than funding the biggest challenge is the fact that the countries in the Sahel aren't particularly stable and lack proper government machinery to undertake such a massive project, aside from all the corruption plaguing to the region. Like the countries which have contributed the most like Senegal, Ethiopia and Nigeria despite their internal challenges are the ones who are more well off when compared to the other countries in the region.
@@thelakeman2538 And don't forget that there's an Islamist insurgency (Nigeria, Niger, Mali, Chad and Burkina Faso) plus ongoing conflict in the Darfur region of Sudan. Plus ongoing conflicts between pastoralists and farmers etc.... The one crucial country is Nigeria, due to the size of its population and economy: if its government were to take the lead it would encourage the others to cooperate and carry out the necessary program without much fuss. And somewhere in the multiverse, there exists a stable, competent and incorruptible Nigerian state, that is capable of this task, as opposed to the Nigerian government of our universe, which doesn't give fuck all about anything other than lining their pockets in a nonstop kleptocratic orgy. So yeah, its doomed.
The aspect ratio of this video is more interesting than the video and Toyota corollas themselves!
It’s very weird
@@salvefrater2582 agreed
EDIT: probably supposed to be uploaded in 16:9, there’s a bit of text cut off at 5:00
It's 4:3 I guess
no its not i think its 3:2
@@xstongames4778 @Royal Tek it’s much wider than them
Scientist: "Let's make African Great Green Wall to prevent Desertification."
Corrupt Politician: "I Gonna end this Man Whole Career"
Nice thumbnail man! Love me some KH! Stay well out there, and Jesus Christ be with you friend.😊
@@Numba003 bot
@@Numba003 jesus christ be praised. Hey Henry has come to see us!
@@psmsedwinfran501 Nah my friend, just a big Kingdom Hearts fan. His thumbnail is a symbol from that game series.
How about African countries do it on their own
Lake Chad in 1973: The Real Chad of the world. Lake Chad in 2021: Adios
RealLifeLore is what happens when you mix and encyclopedia with a Toyota Corolla
Toyota Corollopedia
Encyclotoyota
I dont understand why people love talking about Carollas in here. Take this video. He didnt mention it once and most of his videos rarely get it.
@@baronvonjo1929 because he uses corollas instead of metres/kilometres/kilograms
@@sebbo_h7121 Barely. You could probably count the number of times he has done that on a single hand.
I'm saying he dosnt use the glorious measurement of a Toyota Corolla enough to justify being a meme.
At 3:21 he says that the Sahara Desert covers over “9.2 million km” while on screen it shows “9.2 billion km”. This is either a typo or a voiceover mistake. Just wanted to point this out.
It's definitely a typo. The Sahara is massive but it's not bigger than uranus.
@@haroeneissa790 OP might be a little big around the belt, but you shouldn't make fun of him like that :(
@@JamesBond-xx1lv lmao
It’s both, it should be 9.2 zillion square km
it’s not a typo, the sahara desert has conquered the world and now it is looking to be a galactic empire
"We NEED to build a wall, to keep the Saharans out."
Truee
It will be the best green wall better than all other green walls
This, but unironically.
And the Saharans will pay for it
a wall like no other a great wall great wall I am an expert and I know it's a great wall.
I've learnt much more in one reallifelore video, than my whole semester of taking global studies.
this areas population is projected to triple in size!
Also this area: finding man power is difficult...
My thought exactly. Wonder who done the work in those countries who got something done.
You're right ! Let's put the toddlers at work !
@@XR190190 who do you think mined the rare minerals used to make the phone/computer you wrote this with? but you're correct, child labour is heinous... but the current 135,000,000 inhabitants? are they all toddlers? that's about the same pop. as Russia... trying to tell me they cant find a needle of manpower in that haystack?
@@dylwhite8831 FYI 50% of those 135 000 000 inhabitants are under 14. You can check on the UN stats. Now don't forget that these people don't have any means of going to the trees sites. No roads, not much car/truck like in developed countries. It's a different logistic !
@@XR190190 why would that matter? toddlers cant drive... but again, im not here to solve multiple nations infrastructure problems, just pointing out there is a huge population and that 'triple in size' wont just be births:deaths but also immigration. maybe the government, knowing its in danger, should priorities money and labour distribution... countries like Spain and Australia are often in drought and have put money into desalination plants for their future water consumption.
“I bless the rains down in Africa
Gonna take some time to do the things we never had (ooh, ooh)...”
I hear the drums echoing tonight
But she hears only whispers of some quiet conversation
@@TheSinisterkelly shes coming in 12:30 flight
The moonlit wings reflect the stars that guide me towards salvation
MrBeast: "I seen an opportunity."
Lol
Imagine if he did this tho
@J.W. S.D this would take trillions of dollars in Investments, though it would create an absolute shitload of jobs and new arable land.
Trump
He wont have enough money to help
I really like how he always mentions civ 6. I love the game!
Fun fact: Algeria actually has its own green wall that was completed in the 70s
I feel Algeria has always been innovative and ahead of its time to some extent
@@isetta4083 not politically though
They are behind in that domain compared to it's neighboring country Tunisia but at least Algeria didn't mess up as badly as Libya did
@@mohamedelhediissa289 definitely, they could really benefit from some democracy or some more political influence from people who aren't rich guys over the age of 70
@@isetta4083 oh yeah Algeria is so progressive.
@@paddystrongjaw9995 definitely not. It just has some decent ideas occassionally. Way more often that my country
3:18 - the number shown is 9.2 billion, which is 18 times larger than the surface of the Earth. This DOES sounds like a big problem
The Sahara has been exponentially increasing in size for 3,000 years. It's already started reaching the asteroid belt. You didn't know because you've been living inside the Truman Show for your entire life.
Typo
What about the fact that 90% of the trees planted so far are dead or dying because of lack of after-care?
@S E P Or the countries around it are too disorganized, as they have always been. But it's easy to never put ourselves in question when all we have to do is blaming others, the west in particular, about basically anything that is wrong in Africa.
@S E P I was talking in general, not in this thread specifically. In every video talking about africa, there are a lot of comments like that, including in the comment section of this video here.
@@xenotypos i understand what youre saying, but historically, Europe has a lot to answer for a lot of the issues Africans face. I agree guilt and shame doesnt help anything, but reparations will. But knowing this political climate, white liberals will hijack this train of thought.
Who could possibly have predicted that trees need water? Nobody can be blamed for this.
@@cia3058 but without europe 90% of Africa would still be in the stone age/ the arabs would have colonized later anyway. Africa was almost left untouched by colonization and many africans didn't even see an european.
Obviously many atrocities were commited, like during leopold of belgium reign, but after his death belgium actually threated natives well
Congratulations on your anniversary.
This is the first of your videos I have seen (recommend by YT), great video and topic.
It is very concerning to see how the predicted population explosion in Africa, along with temperature rise, less fresh water, less agricultural land, it doesn't bode well for the children born today in the continent of Africa.
"most of growth is in a southern direction" I would think it was hard to grow significantly to the north. Right?
Huh? North africa has lots of fertile land, and it has plenty room to grow east.
@@Hjernespreng isn't there already desert in he east and the fertile land in the north is rather small when you look at it
@@Hjernespreng Just replying to your comment growth was mostly to the south..... There is litle land to the west, Almost none to the North, and not that much to the East. Its a map thing that you state the obvious that growth has mostly been to the south .....
Same thought. They need hyperbole to keep you watching.
@Patrick Swan North and West has mountain ranges which blocks the desert (Atlas Mountains) North and East is desert all the way to the sea and south is also the directions wind blows most of he year
Throughout 5 years the best talent he's developed is how he segues into a skill share ad.
All these African "leaders" sucking their resources dry while their people die off.
To be fair it’s not entirely their fault. European empires left them with independence but divided the land along lines that benefited them not the locals and made it harder for the new governments to actually govern their new subject regardless if they were republics or not. European colonies were also often sucked dry before they became independent. And were so petty they often destroyed their own infrastructure before leaving so that the locals could never become a super power contender of their own. African nations have access to some of the most fertile resource centers on earth. However, their forced to make uneven trades with the world because they don’t have the skilled workers necessary to actually extract the resources or the infrastructure to actually produce it themselves
Selling off their resources to china, when their done they will leave it a dry husk.
@@rageraptor7127 they should redraw their borders then
@@bruhz_089 it’s not as simple as that. Even if they did most of these nations are already running unstable regions each with their own unique problems. Ranging from ethnic turf wars to drought and famine issues. While other places are prospering but still suffering from wealth inequality. Also what country would give up their land willingly to another solely on the premise that one side would get benefits the other one could use as leverage for political influence around the world. It’s even worse that a lot of these nations don’t have the infrastructure to make skilled workers fast enough because their educational systems simply didn’t receive any investment when they were still colonies. For example much of what was once French Africa. Is still dependent on French intervention because they destroyed all the schools and factories when they left so that the governments couldn’t produce resources without their help. And in an act of desperation many nations ended up making horrible deals with foreign powers like China to rebuild their economies. However, many of these deals are debt traps designed to conquer the very regions the governments are trying to save.
@@rageraptor7127 Sounds like French Guiana, sucked dry and left for dead. Courtesy of France.
RLL: Shows picture of oil
USA: *Someone needs some democracy*
Miracle get some oil if they they send hundreds of millions of Africans migrate to europe. Democracy equals mass migration 😂
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THAT'S FRIKKIN HILARIOUS MAN!
The US has been the number 1 oil producer for awhile. Since the US developed fracking we dont need oil from anyone. We are a net exporter. Biden may change that...empowering lots of bad places. But we will see.
3:20 the text says 9.2 billion instead of million
Billion... Million... it all sounds the same. I mean, how do you add zeroes anyway, when they are zero?
@@Banana_Split_Cream_Buns They difference between a million and a billion is HUGE.
@@swargpatel7634 I was kidding. Though there are a lot of really dumb people in this world so I guess that level of stupidity I was feigning was believable.
Uh...
This should be top comment because, principle.
$8 billion is like a scratch on USA's military budget
8 billion is basically nothing for most industrialized countries...
Germany for example now pays 40 billion to shut down coal plants until 2038. Or in other words this money is needed to keep the coal plants going until then because they are already making losses :/
thats just 60 * new F16V
Isn't that the cost of 1 aircraft carrier?
It’s not the USA’s responsibility to pay for that shit, doesn’t effect America
@@admiralkipper4540
it does...
It destabalizes countries, which can fuel war and terrorism. Terrorists doing stuff in America is be a concept you should be familiar with.
Despite that the US is one of the biggest contributers to climate change, which directly makes America partially resposible!
0:58 And has the Gathering Storm expansion. That expansion is the one that added environmental stuff. It's not in the base game.
Yeah I have GS and it’s really good. And yes a few of my world have struggled environmentally
He doesn't play, otherwise he would know that 1) Spain is not in Africa and 2) Less than 10% of Spain is drylands.
Mildly drunk on a Sunday night, eating chicken tenders and watching RealLifeLore.... This is peak happiness
It's crazy how much the animation quality of your content has increased in five years.
Congratulations and keep up with the good work!
Man these videos never seem to disappoint!
Dude didn’t even watch the full video and he already pulling a IGN move
@@subline_funtime **these**
But I find myself constantly being disappointed with these videos.
Disappointed in humanity of course, BUT STILL (XD)
Missed opportunity to mention how many Toyota Carolas Californians wouldn't drive for 3 years
"Africa Is Over Populated By Billion People" :-
*Sweats In Indian And Chinese*
,what are you saying? African has around 1.3 billion people. Its not at all over populated
@blueBeanieboos TV The hell there isn't
@blueBeanieboos TV lol that there is such a thing as overpopulation. 😑
blueBeanieboos TV are you familiar with the term “Carrying capacity?”
A population can only grow if resources are in excess. If there is not enough resources in a certain area, then the population cannot grow. That’s why humanitarian crises such as drought, famine, and disease occur.
@blueBeanieboos TV Well not yet
2:05
Love how all of Australia is shaded, even the parts that aren’t desert
Edit: Just realised Tasmania isn’t on the map he used, which, as an Aussie, is fucking hilarious
I am ancient german BAR BAR BAR
Also he put all of spain and turkey as deserts
These are drylands, not deserts.
They are drylands, not deserts
@@syrialak101 some of Australia is grassland
When he says “Sahel” it sounds like he’s emphasizing the “hel” part
Is there a difference? Lol
@@abdurahman3896 sahel means coast in arabic you genius
i would ask 'why the animosity' but you both have similar names so i'll let you guys settle this
@@abdullahal-sharif8640
Sahel: سهل
Which means plain.
Not Sah⁷el ساحل which means coast.
@@ضاد-و6ع both in english are spelled the same so yeah
*shows Africa
Madagascar: am I a joke to you?
I can't believe I've never heard of this before and what a great project! So many great benefits and we really should be planting as many trees as we can to makeup for all the deforestation going on all over the world
Don't trees need water to live?
Like many others, you made the mistake of showing nuclear plant steam as an example of pollution. It's just water steam, not CO2 emissions. They're a great example of clean energy.
The steam is clean but there is still a lot of radioactive waste.
@@AugustJayGames There is a tiny amount of radioactive waste. The problem is that you can't safely store it. Also, it's not fair to compare nuclear to no nuclear, you need to compare it to other power generation methods. And then nuclear scores above average, how close to the top it is depends on what you prioritize. If you aim for lowest CO2 emission per kWh, then nuclear beats everyone. If you aim for shortest term pollution then burning wood cut from a well managed forest wins. If you aim for lowest cost then burning coal wins. If you aim for lowest construction costs, then nuclear is the worst option there is. If you aim for lowest water use, then I think solar is the best option.
@@bramvanduijn8086 I'm aware of the strengths and weaknesses you've listed. I only said there is waste and not on the form of steam like the person said.
Also thousands of tons of waste is generated a year. I wouldn't call it small.
@@AugustJayGames Cool, then we are mostly in agreement. I completely agree that the steam is an bad picture to use as a symbol of waste.
I just remembered that the cooling water is still warm when it leaves the plant, so that should count as waste too since it affects the place it is released negatively. So I agree, nuclear does have quite a bit of waste. Still... less harmful than coal.
@@AugustJayGames Have you even considered that this "waste" could be refined to be used elsewhere ? Technology have quite progressed on the matter and would even go faster if the public didn't have such a bad opinion on nuclear.
Plus people often think nuclear plant = radioactivity = cancer to people around. Yet there are so many more cancers cause by coal and/or fuel powerplants. (300x more iirc)
So it's quite ironical to see Germany stopping nuclear powerplants (that could have still worked for few decades. the cost of building is already done and all the infrastructures that has been in contact will be considered nuclear waste to be stocked so why not use it fully to have the best efficiency ?!) to replace them with coal powerplants, so + economic costs to build, + release of Co2 in the atmosphere, + release of fine particules that'll make people sicks. And yet they congratule themselves for doing that for the planet, being so much ecological and safe for populations.....
Thomas Sankara was a great president, leading a massive effort against desertification
Thomas sankara was surely one of the greatest leaders of any country ever
Too bad some idiot troglodyte decided to assassinate him
*Every 60 seconds, a minute in the Sahara passes.*
With your help we can stop this
I swear to God I've seen you before somewhere
It makes sense now....
shoreZ don't swear to god
@@trill8967 I'm not a five year old
NASA just said in 2019 that satellite imagery has shown that the Sahara desert has shrunk by 8% over the last 30 years.
Even if that’s true, more trees is still good
@Don K lmao
@Don K im so jealous of u ☹
Who even believes NASA? i mean other than Americans
Source it
Last time i was this early, Sahara wasn't even a desert
"Got any experience as a lumberjack?"
"Well, I used to work in the Sahara Forest"
"You mean desert"
"Sure, that's what they call it NOW"
3:19
When 1 million = 1 billion
American
Million is correct in this context; he just needs to remove three zeros from the figure.
@@bpark0906 the extra zeros look nicer
Looks like the aspect ratio of the video is a bit off
1920x1188 according to the Stats box. 1.61:1, vs 1.77:1 which is normal.
Wdym
2100: Europe's power problem: How to stop the Africa
“The rise of Africa”
British Empire **nervous sweating**
Basically entire western Europe sweating nervously*
@@milokaw4193 Sweting because the inmigration lol
@@milokaw4193 They're not ready for the reverse of being called "native" Europeans. lol
@@milokaw4193 why would the rise of African countries economies and lviing standards mean more migration?
@@staC-wh6ik living standards won’t increase though, if they could they would have already
There's also the massive issue of freshwater salinization contaminating what water we have left.
Says surfaces in km2, distances in miles. No we don't want that.
Not everyone in this world is american
There are people who are European, you know
@@MitskiMia asian,african,latin
@@DodgerX yea ok
@@trollrat2828 yes
Just love your work bro!!!😍😍❤
"Honey, we're out of food and water...perhaps we should have children!"
More like uga buga uga...
Every animal and plant species copulate at times of uncertainty. Guess you never heard about the baby boom in America after the world wars. It gives a greater chance for your genetic offspring to live on. Once Africa solves hunger and infrastructure issues it has enough land to support 8 billion people, you can fit China and India in Africa and still have space for the US and the entire UK with space left over, so I'm interested to see Africa become the most diverse continent in History even though it kinda already is.
@@theoligarchstepper Key word there is after. And ya if Africa can solve its greatest issues than it would be able to support its population but those are very difficult tasks to accomplish. Hope the continent can but hope shouldn't replace a pragmatic view of the situation.
@@benjamin7871 Keyword isn't after at all you can't anticipate war and uncertainty you can only react after it happens, the baby boomers were born after both world wars and the great depression that didn't excuse them from war. All of them were born during the Korean wars and most likely served in the Vietnam and Cold war, all periods of uncertainty, this is just America so people can understand it happens to all humans. Other people are dealt in heavier hand being that they fall into the sphere of influence of regional powers. The only reason there's no country in Africa on par with Europe or Asia is that their Navy's weren't advanced enough to defend the coast and they had no knowledge of gun powder. Great Zimbabwe for example was past the iron age when encountered by the Portuguese who just destroyed the whole city from the shore using cannon fire, raided the city of its resources, and later renamed it Rhodesia and told people Asain's built the city, not native Africans. Only a fool thinks their government tells them the truth.
@@theoligarchstepper I'd argue that there is a lot of other factors and uncertainty has lead to both rises and falls in population. Your not wrong that it didn't excuse them from war but just as you pointed out "you can't anticipate war". Some were born during the Korean war but it lasted 3 years not 18 like the baby boomers generation did, so no all were not born during it. Plus it was a tenth of the size of WW2. The Vietnam war would be a great example except for the fact that it literally happened the year after the baby boomer generation ended, weird how that happened huh?
Africa being colonized is due to a multitude of factors like infighting between countries, European medical advancements, and political instability. While European weapons were more advanced and definitely played a factor keep in mind that most of non coastal Africa wasn't colonized until 1880; most had access to guns and gunpowder. The times that European powers successfully colonized just about anywhere, it heavily relied on divide and conquer tacits or they just got lucky with their timing.
All of this isn't to say Africa can't or won't rise just that it still faces some great challenges.
Happy 5 years. Keep up the good work, you make one of the most unique and amazing videos on youtube. Looking forward to see what ideas you come up with for the future.
Congratulations on 5 years! It’s been great watching these over the years.
Fencing off areas and not allowing animals in does not rebuild the soil. Multi-pattern grazing is what rebuilds soil. Having tons of animals on a small portion of land and moving them frequently what puts organic material back into the soil.
I can't wait to fly over the Sahara and see a great green wall.
I cant wait for people to die so we dont have these issues
@@rutvikk. Yikes
@@rutvikk. Hey, I have the perfect solution. How about we all nuke ourselves? If everyone is dead, there is no one left to complain, which means that all problems are solved for an infinite amount of time. It's perfect (:
To be fair it would probably mainly look just the same as today, albeit a bit further north. The wall of trees will increase vegetation coverage south of it so you wouldn't really be able to see where the wall was actually created.
@@rutvikk. We'll start with you, would you like to volunteer?
Random fact: Oxford University is older than the Aztec Empire.
Many others are as well
@alfred lauridsen 😂😂
@alfred lauridsen My wet fart that I just farted has contributed to more knowledge than Africa ever has.
@alfred lauridsen X to doubt
@@jaouad_h "The Great Library of Alexandria was one of the most significant libraries during ancient times"
that doesn't count because it was built by the Greeks
I like how the Sudanian savanna is not appart of sudan
I love this video and project so much and really appreciate your awesome works! Unfortunately I only found an ad link and no sources referring to your content. Please share your sources with us. :-)
The ratio on this video i kinda weird. Looks like it cuts of some of the content as well.
RLL: Build a wall.......
Trump: I knew it
SUPRISE! I am the funniest YTer evah!!!! Just kidding, it was no surprise. Everybody knew already. HAHAHHAHA!!!! That was an amazing joke (it was real talk though). WAWAWAWAWA!!!! Good afternoon, dear agam
good idea
wrong continente and wall material
Walls don't work
Okay guys, nothing to see here. Ignore the roach in the middle of the reply section and get on with your day
Trump: Builds a wall
Africa: WRITE THAT DOWN
Africa went full trump by saying "build that wall" as the Sahara was crossing the border and taking their jobs
This is way oder.
but a better version of Trump
Black Trump can't hurt you, he isn't real:
Black Trump:
@Black Box Painting he is the one real God in this land
@@Kentucky_Caveman Make Africa Great Again!
There has been a 20% increase in the greening of the earth due to the rise in CO2, according to NASA. NASA's maps show quite the increase in greening around the edges of the Sahara
3:25 why give miles alongside square kilometers? Why not give the width in kilometers as well?
I’m so American I didn’t even notice
He was off by a factor of 1000 versus the script
@@enfynet he said it right tho
Yeah, I really start to hate it when TH-camrs only care about their US audience. The world is larger than just the US.
@@dans4323 for 'Murcans, 'Murca is the entire world.
"A mass migration could occur unlike the likes we have ever before seen..."
*Confetti falls*
Unbased
?
Europe: Chuckles. I'm in danger.
dude. I scrolled down and read this comment at the exact same time the narrator was saying this
@@jonbaxter2254 Nah. At this point europe will be full of right wing governments. Bullets are cheap.
You re the only TH-cam channel that I don’t skip the Sponsored part
I hope they plant native trees to the areas that don’t become invasive
Africa -*Exists*
Ethopia- ''Here, people call me the savior''
😂
No
@@ahmedmohamedabdelhakemmoha9760 ok
there's a video of a guy in australia that developed a system to reclaim desert areas - u would have to google it
If we're thinking of the same guy, that's just permaculture. A great idea, but not all that effective in reclaiming land, more so in re-fertilizing _almost_ eroded land.
However, a South African professor is experimenting with mimicking the migration patterns of great herds from pre-historic times. Moving a shit ton of cattle over a huge area is a fantastic way to create enough ecosystems on the micro scale that you eventually end up with "re-greened" regions on the macro scale. The key is that they desperately need to be moved regularly, and over a large area, or they would simply lead to more soil degradation. Such an undertaking is difficult on a large scale, and has to be _very_ carefully managed by a central body not driven by profits in order to succeed. The chances of a non-capitalist solution to climate change continue to be frighteningly low.
@@TheNinetySecond" If we're thinking of the same guy, that's just permaculture. "
if you search on youtube for Greening the desert, you will what iva lindsay means.
its a project in jordan( one of the most arid places inthe world), and think that just planting trees is useless( china did this and it failed) because you have to grown an eco system that is capable of sustaining itself ( hence permaculture).
African woman: My family is dying of hunger
Journalist: How many kids do you have?
Woman: 17
Journalist: Interesting
Meanwhile, women don’t even want to touch you
@@ribos2762 🤣🤣🤣
ID also like to point out to people this one very crucial fact: SOIL HEALTH makes most of the world completely useless by using the rather damaging method of single crop farming and also using materials which leak into damage the soil.
Seriously people look it up and if you can do simple things in your area that might help!
Absolutely love your channel and your content. You are so educational. Would you consider making a part 2 to this African great green wall video going more in depth into the science and logistics of how this is actually accomplished? For example, what kind of trees are planted, where are they planted, how do they get water, and what is the expectation that it will actually work? Thanks so much!
The USA: **Uses Imperial.**
Rest of the World: **Uses Metric.**
UK: **USES BOTH.**
RealLifeLore: *TOYOTA COROLLA ANYBODY?*
India uses both as well. For example, distance in km, height in feet.
USA uses both. The cars sitting in my driveway I don't think have even one SAE bolt on them. My first car in the 1970s was mostly SAE. One in a while I'd find a metric. Aircraft on the other hand are usually SAE.
Most people in the US use some Metric, mainly millimeters for things like tools and ammunition and liters for some liquids, but in all honesty a lot of people are genuinely resentful of the spite and venom presented by those that make fun of the United States for sticking with the imperial system even though it was around before the metric system and it works just fine.
everyone:
this comment section: L A K E C H A D
yeah it's stupid
@@Ausholliday15 +
Lake Lake
I'm more interested in Djibouti.
"LIVE WHERE THE FOOD IS!" -Sam Kinison
Grab your kids, grab your shit! We'll make one trip. WE'LL TAKE YOU TO WHERE THE FOOD IS!
Next Video: „How to kill the Mediterranean“ and it just explains Atlantropa for the 50th time on TH-cam
@Lianhua Xin notice what ?
Already a vid on this is made
8 billion dollar for such an enormous project, with such a great effect isn't even much.
It's a dream scenario made up by corrupt project leads. There's no way such a big project would cost eight billion dollars... Even if you enforced slave labour.
@@RealCadde And what if it's the double of that? The US bought an aircraft carrier for literally a trillion dollars if I remember correctly. Does the cost even matter in scenarios like this?
@@gyurto If the cost doesn't matter then feel free to contribute to the project.
Also, a trillion dollar aircraft carrier is paid with taxes. If those paying taxes don't like it they can... You know... Move to Africa?
... Oh wait, the GDP of the US is about 20 trillion.
The GDP of the entirety of Africa is 2.6 trillion.
The population of the US is 328 million.
The population of Africa is 1.3 billion.
The GDP per capita in the US is $63,000
The GDP per capita in Africa is $1,970
IF we flipped some numbers around and gave Africa the GDP per capita of the US, their GDP would have been ~250 trillion.
Yet... Africa spends most of its time breeding and warring.
Meanwhile, the US invests in its national security because it has already got most of its other grounds covered.
And no, Africa is not a poor land. They have PLENTY of untapped resources, if only they could get their shit together and stop breeding and fighting each other.
But hey, since cost doesn't matter. I assume you've already bought a ticket and a bunch of trees to plant them yourself using your own hard labor to do so...
... Or maybe you are sitting behind a keyboard.
@@gyurto You remember extremely incorrectly.. If you're talking about the USS Gerald R. Ford, then you're so far off you must be getting your 'facts' from the onion... R&D was somewhere around $5 billion, cost per unit is $12.8 billion.. 2 ordered, 2 completed, 10 ordered. Also Cadde is right. That price tag of $8 billion has to be off. That might be the price for the _seeds_ only.
@@SharpWits2013 Yes you are right, I was way off it was only 13 billion dollar yes. Still even if the project needs 30 billion dollars it is worth it.
Counting on Mr Beast to help plant these trees
team trees 2021: africa edition
Australia just chilling as the only full desert county
U mean country?
If so then hmm what about the middle east? Saudi Arabia is a desert
Australia is only deserted in center
Coast r greeny
Fun fact: this topic was part of my listening examination for proficiency!!
Ah yes, the classic missing new zeland from maps
It's just real-world Wacanda ;)
Let’s move New Zealand closer to Africa
Where's the entire pacific ocean?
@@Matryoshkabomb they used it to water the tree wall
Fun fact: the Sahara has records amounts of rainfall in the last decades and is actually become more wet even tough it's expanding . This is the result of warmer oceans which gives more rain. Let's hope this will continue !
The problem is partially that the soil in the Sahara has become degraded sand which cannot hold any water. The water immediately collects and flows out the Sahara in the form of a flood (which is why people sometimes drown in deserts). Just rain isn't enough, the water also has to stay in the region. In normal soil this happens naturally, but if you want to restore the Sahara you will first have to plant some specific shrubs which can hold water and survive in the desert (which is non-trivial), so that then other plants can grow with that water, their roots can enhance the soil, etc.
Increasing CO2 is making the Sahara greener. :)
The sand needs more animal dung and plant debris in it which can retain the water.
It always amazes me how we can build machines that kill so easily…but when it comes to invest developing infrastructure for good it always gets forgotten.
It would be great if u could add sources to your video. In my opinions they are missing and are almost mandatory in the times we are today. Otherweise your videos are great!
"Like if every Californian kept their car park for 3.5 years" So like taking the I-5 from San Francisco to LA?
more like taking the 5 from SD to Orange County, we can't wait THAT long
So they're going to build a maginot line for -old french colonies- central Africa
If they build a maginot line, the Sahara desert would find a way to go around it lmao
@@jubk nah knowing the Belgians influence i doubt the congo will bother finishing it
Humanity as a whole needs to come together on projects like this. Seriously 8 billion is nothing at a multinational level.
Human beings coming together while Google is running the planet I don't think so . Their business model is creating hate and different groups so they can make money out of credit while people are arguing
Real Life Lore: *Deserts are growing due to climate change*
Me, who poured sand in my backyard and put a heater next to it: *VISIBLE SWEATING*
Wtf
Y
But why would anyone ever even do that-
The Sahara used to be a green savanna-like land with rivers and lakes around 10000 years ago. So stopping the Sahara is next to impossible.
Another issue is heavy water use. With the growing population, water use can be reduced, but never stopped. Hopefully brought into check.
No it is not. China is doing it to their deserts as we speak.
The sahara: oh so you're approaching me?
noooo JOJO reference is here too... lmao
So that's same type of s'ando as Star Platinum
Lmao jojo
I don't understand how it could cost that much and take long with such a large population of unemployed and potentially starving people, wouldn't there be incredible demand for labour in such areas?
It’s probably less of a labour cost issue but a material and logistics issue
@@kuto0987 that could be true, your picture says your likely Canadian as well. I know we plant as many trees as we cut down for the most part so that's what I was basing my logic on our ability to mass plant saplings
@@sammysedore True but there is much more to consider when planting trees from scratch on that level in an area as unstable as Africa. I get what you are saying though.