The Yugas with Joseph Selbie

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @driddy1
    @driddy1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is so fascinating! Allows so many things throughout history to make sense. Thank you for sharing 🙏❤️

  • @cristinaoviloleyva8423
    @cristinaoviloleyva8423 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello joseph I have read your book the physics of God and I love everything you expose because I am one of those people who have gone through extra-corporeal experience and also a great mystic. Thank you from the heart 💜

  • @gwynneveireland
    @gwynneveireland 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am reading this now

  • @tr7b410
    @tr7b410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have been referring people to this information & on utube Ramana Maharshi:Be as You Are Chapter 12, Experience and Samadhi for years, to make sense of some very important esoteric truths.

  • @gvanchapman
    @gvanchapman ปีที่แล้ว

    🙂💙💜❤🧡💛Answering the Yugas theory of Swami Sri Yukteswar Giri:- :) (Trying a philosophical dialogue with devotees and sannyasins)
    :) *** Look at this question: 🙂 Do we need time or insight? _(The ego in us does not like detectives in our life.)
    🙂 A Yuga, is a period of 25 million years.
    A cycle of light and darkness of consciousness for humanity.
    :) If we are going to wait some 25 million years for us to evolve,
    it is useless to investigate, we can say.
    So, (the ego thinks) we should continue asking ourselves and others to respect our choices...
    -to respect or accept the vain arrogance and pretense we justify ...🙂
    :) Krishnamurti, by the way, did not see any solution in time, in the tomorrow, but in awareness…
    in being aware, in the 'here and now'.
    Trying a philosophical dialogue with devotees and sannyasins***
    *Philosophic Community Project :) van Chapman.
    For a free world,
    and a peaceful, honest, and intelligent solution to terrorism.

  • @Kormac80
    @Kormac80 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Darwinian is grossly misrepresented by his characterization. Darwinian evolution is not about a linear progression of human beings from caveman hunter gatherer to more culturally sophisticated human beings. Thats not Darwinian.

  • @marianrose1259
    @marianrose1259 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So why does your book lag so far behind current realisations? Why is it, and you, stuck with male specific language? Humankind, humans, human beings and people - all words adopted decades ago to include everyone, yet you cling to the long outmoded masculine as if trapped in a time warp. I tried to read your book but it was repetitive, far too speculative and the malecentric language jarred like something out of the mid-kali yuga - if yugas exist!

    • @abhi-_-
      @abhi-_- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Try to focus on the topic and not the language or the medium