But what about laws like Rico that have a civil and criminal statue can it be used both ways civil to bring out criminal charges in criminal to bring out civil charges
if the defendant in a civil suit has committed no crime, on what basis are they being sued? If the person suing them is claiming they or they're property has been damaged, then some law has been broken and this is a criminal case. Also, we don't get different trials based on the severity of the crime in question, so someone committing a small infraction would indeed get the same cases as a murderer.
Hi I lived in a state group home and I was wronged by staff on multiple occasions including Verbal abuse mental abuse and he even got one girl to fight me that’s physical abuse this went on for years and the executive director didn’t help they even encouraged a relationship with my child father I was 14 he was 23 this is a state agency am I able to sue them
Say, if a person is considered guilty in a civil case, does it make him a criminal? -- is he/needed required to declare as such in, say, 'criminal charges' column in the job employment form?
No. Generally the court does not use the word "guilty" in a civil case. You are "liable" or "not liable." There would be no criminal record from losing a civil case.
Say if you didnt agree with what the court agreed to you could appellate to the a court right but could you appellate from circuit cour directly to supreme court
Each state has its own hierarchy of appellate courts. And typically, if there is a mid-level appellate court, it cannot be bypassed. Federal courts have their own appellate courts that usually cannot be bypassed on the way to the Supreme Court.
Rules of procedure and evidence in civil and criminal cases usually differ. The civil judge would make his or her own rulings on admissibility without regard to what was admitted into evidence in a criminal trial. Having said that, sworn testimony from a criminal trial may be useful to impeach a witness who testifies differently in a subsequent civil trial.
Criminal, insofar as the prosecution must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas, a plaintiff bring the same claims in civil court need only prove their case to a preponderance of the evidence (i.e. greater than 50% probability). Think OJ.
@@legalyou8412 You are not learned in contract law. If you don't get the replevin bond check from the plaintiff/prosecutor who loses you are to be compensated just like if you crash your car or if the police harm you wrongfully. All public officials are bonded, meaning they are indemnified with surety in case they screw up. Whoever sues or puts a suit against must bond their claim in case they lose the defendant must be compensated.
I hire someone to plant a tree in my yard. Their contract says I will not sue if a person on my property was harmed, as long as they follow company safety rules. They don't follow rules and hurt someone so I wanna sue. Is this Criminal or Civil? They broke the law.
That would be civil because it is you bringing the action, rather than the state. But not all rule breaking gives rise to a civil cause of action. You would have to have been harmed in some way.
But if they failed to take reasonable care and caution, which resulted in bodily injury to a person, would that not also be a ground for criminal action?
i louis geoghagan condemn denver find denver guilty time for a new govenor 2022 time to vote in a new govenor because govenor got fired he shouldnt broke me or the masquarded i am wittness to this fire
What crap. it is the difference between legal and lawful, to break the law is to commit a crime. to break legislation is an offence as there is no victim. that's why its offensive hence called an offence. one is government court and the other is the people court, thus a jury. hence the people vs O J Simpson case. all legislation is civil law, the government even employed its own lawyers called the police. or government policy enforcer. they claim legislation is the law but the government will never enforce it for you, only against you. thus you only have rights if you can afford to enforce them AKA get your own policy enforcer / lawyer. I find it incredible that the government call legislation law, is legislation given the force of law by the consent of the governed or is it made law by the consent of the governed..... thats right force of law, not making it law. the things they dont want you to know. lol. legal government , lawful is the people, and oh yeah, the common law or peoples law stands with or with out government legislation. if the government fell tomorrow There would be no offences but there would still be crimes and a court to prosecute law breakers. its to make you feel as though you are truly dependant on government, no government no law. or so they want you to believe. to get power over you, they will never accept that you have not consented to being governed (signed the electoral register form). because to live lawfully without legal grants you freedoms against the rich. no longer can it be their legally owned land and you can live on any land you like and build a house, or spend your entire life in full time employment paying for a house you could build yourself in 5 year max. in england the first land registry was called by the people (the dooms day book.)
This information is wrong and incorrect and all action are civil period Rule 1. Scope and Purpose Primary tabs These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the United States district courts, except as stated in Rule 81. They should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. Notes (As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949; Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007; Apr. 29, 2015, eff. Dec. 1, 2015.) Rule 2. One Form of Action There is one form of action-the civil action
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.75[2/2] คุยแบบนี้แล้วจะจบกี่โมงพ่ะย่ะค่ะ!!!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/N6E8njWH7Zg/mqdefault.jpg)
![เปิดบ้าน เปิด Supercar อั๋นโอกิ เคยเอา rolls Royce เเลกพระ องค์ละ 100 ล้าน l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FeGwJwXauZ0/mqdefault.jpg)
Useful contents
Impressive video. I like it.
I am studying to be a court interpreter and this was very helpful. Thank you!
So how is it going so far?
Im a fish
ur bad
Criminal Justice System 👇
th-cam.com/video/iPp4w9Cax5s/w-d-xo.html
@kalodude5621 heard he got railroaded into a case. Lmao America wouldn't surprise me no more though lol
Amazing 🤩
I'm in criminal justice, thanks soooo much! saved me some time!!
What
We are connecting both ✌️i love this video yes very helpful tamsak
But what about laws like Rico that have a civil and criminal statue can it be used both ways civil to bring out criminal charges in criminal to bring out civil charges
Wow! This is Helpful!
if the defendant in a civil suit has committed no crime, on what basis are they being sued? If the person suing them is claiming they or they're property has been damaged, then some law has been broken and this is a criminal case. Also, we don't get different trials based on the severity of the crime in question, so someone committing a small infraction would indeed get the same cases as a murderer.
This is what I've always wondered, this system makes no sense to me
I love learn
bro you help me so much
This video is very helpful and amazing ❤❤❤
Are you my classmate ifra fareed
Love this video, thank you so much!
Thankz bcz i have sst exam fron wss school
Hi I lived in a state group home and I was wronged by staff on multiple occasions including
Verbal abuse mental abuse and he even got one girl to fight me that’s physical abuse this went on for years and the executive director didn’t help they even encouraged a relationship with my child father I was 14 he was 23 this is a state agency am I able to sue them
Say, if a person is considered guilty in a civil case, does it make him a criminal?
-- is he/needed required to declare as such in, say, 'criminal charges' column in the job employment form?
no.
No. Generally the court does not use the word "guilty" in a civil case. You are "liable" or "not liable." There would be no criminal record from losing a civil case.
Generally, civil protective orders are not criminal matters although an employment application might ask about them.
Say if you didnt agree with what the court agreed to you could appellate to the a court right but could you appellate from circuit cour directly to supreme court
Each state has its own hierarchy of appellate courts. And typically, if there is a mid-level appellate court, it cannot be bypassed. Federal courts have their own appellate courts that usually cannot be bypassed on the way to the Supreme Court.
What is the value of court evidence given in criminal proceedings in civil case
Rules of procedure and evidence in civil and criminal cases usually differ. The civil judge would make his or her own rulings on admissibility without regard to what was admitted into evidence in a criminal trial. Having said that, sworn testimony from a criminal trial may be useful to impeach a witness who testifies differently in a subsequent civil trial.
What is a higher burden of proof? Is it for the criminal case or the civil case
Criminal, insofar as the prosecution must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas, a plaintiff bring the same claims in civil court need only prove their case to a preponderance of the evidence (i.e. greater than 50% probability). Think OJ.
what if the defendant successfully won the criminal case? example self-defense shooting someone. will he/she get compensation?
Generally, no. There would be no automatic compensation for an unsuccessful prosecution.
@@legalyou8412 You are not learned in contract law. If you don't get the replevin bond check from the plaintiff/prosecutor who loses you are to be compensated just like if you crash your car or if the police harm you wrongfully.
All public officials are bonded, meaning they are indemnified with surety in case they screw up.
Whoever sues or puts a suit against must bond their claim in case they lose the defendant must be compensated.
Ya nice
thankyou
Where does the word tort come in? What does it mean?
It has to do with negligence, responsibilities and defamation of character.
lets go jack! be the small change you want to see in the world!
subscribed! amazing channel for a future law student!
@Lachlan Davison image being named lachlan literally the worst name ever
@@yalelaw image or imagine?
anyone from Mr. Kline's Class?
MEEE
😊
Hi Am Mr yang
I would like to looking a good civil lawyer to helping me fight my house insurance
If anyone of you think you can helping me please contact me by this phone
913 265 9931
@@jackher7176 how did things turn out?
ok
So amber cant go to jaill?
I hire someone to plant a tree in my yard.
Their contract says I will not sue if a person on my property was harmed, as long as they follow company safety rules.
They don't follow rules and hurt someone so I wanna sue.
Is this Criminal or Civil?
They broke the law.
That would be civil because it is you bringing the action, rather than the state. But not all rule breaking gives rise to a civil cause of action. You would have to have been harmed in some way.
But if they failed to take reasonable care and caution, which resulted in bodily injury to a person, would that not also be a ground for criminal action?
So what type of lawyer do you hire for a civil case?
Probably not a criminal defense
I've seen innocent people loose a civil case.
Okay
Who is here regarding the Breonna Taylor case?
Right here
Earl sweatpants
kanawastaken_ on twitch just saying :)
permission to use your animation for my schoolwork please
l
Anyone from mr.buis class prob not lol
i louis geoghagan condemn denver find denver guilty time for a new govenor 2022 time to vote in a new govenor because govenor got fired he shouldnt broke me or the masquarded i am wittness to this fire
What crap. it is the difference between legal and lawful, to break the law is to commit a crime. to break legislation is an offence as there is no victim. that's why its offensive hence called an offence. one is government court and the other is the people court, thus a jury. hence the people vs O J Simpson case. all legislation is civil law, the government even employed its own lawyers called the police. or government policy enforcer. they claim legislation is the law but the government will never enforce it for you, only against you. thus you only have rights if you can afford to enforce them AKA get your own policy enforcer / lawyer. I find it incredible that the government call legislation law, is legislation given the force of law by the consent of the governed or is it made law by the consent of the governed..... thats right force of law, not making it law. the things they dont want you to know. lol. legal government , lawful is the people, and oh yeah, the common law or peoples law stands with or with out government legislation. if the government fell tomorrow There would be no offences but there would still be crimes and a court to prosecute law breakers. its to make you feel as though you are truly dependant on government, no government no law. or so they want you to believe. to get power over you, they will never accept that you have not consented to being governed (signed the electoral register form). because to live lawfully without legal grants you freedoms against the rich. no longer can it be their legally owned land and you can live on any land you like and build a house, or spend your entire life in full time employment paying for a house you could build yourself in 5 year max. in england the first land registry was called by the people (the dooms day book.)
Your comment saved my court report....
I’m cool
qui est là pour un boulot pour la fac ?
Mdr c'est passé comment ?
@@pablogriswold421 bah licence obtenu mention covid quoi !
@@albertlamaire5860 félicitations :)
gap tooth T
Anyone from Ms. SAMIAS class?
This information is wrong and incorrect and all action are civil period
Rule 1. Scope and Purpose
Primary tabs
These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the United States district courts, except as stated in Rule 81. They should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.
Notes
(As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949; Feb. 28, 1966, eff. July 1, 1966; Apr. 22, 1993, eff. Dec. 1, 1993; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007; Apr. 29, 2015, eff. Dec. 1, 2015.)
Rule 2. One Form of Action
There is one form of action-the civil action