If they add Norway as a culture, they need crusader king Sigird. Went all the way from Scandinavia down to the Mediterranean wrecking house wherever he went then returned via land from Byzantium and giving his ships and some men (into the Varangian guard) to the emperor.
Did weather and natural disasters make it into the game? I love the feeling of having a living world that feels organic like it could be a real version of history. I want the planet to feel real and i think better disasters and natural events helps with that.
Absolutely mixed feelings. If you love the old games of course there will be something you miss in civ 7. But I don't think the hate will be half as strong as the hate civ 5 got back in the day. With expansions it turned out to be a pretty good game :)
@@DeSackOfPotatoes I have been a lover of Civilization since Civ III and I do hope this is another hit. I have serious doubts after this video though. The art design does look improved over Civ 6, I like that cliffs are now actual parts of the landscape and can be inland. However, again, you will notice its very similar is style and function as Humankind's maps. My worry is more that this is imitation rather than inspiration.
I like how in game you can choose “democracy” as your government but everything goes as you say… 😃 Don’t say it is unrealistic. That is just how my home country Turkey is governed today.
Considering most games end around the industrial age or sooner, 3 ages sounds good to experience more. It just depends on how they handle the new ages mechanics of legacies.
so far it sounds like the antiquity age will be able to be a "complete" game on its own in the way that we can currently get to the medieval era or so and see the writing on the wall and players will abandon the save.
The Ages is an excellent change. They said it: "we are trying to teach through this game." Historical emersion is a core value of the Civilization series, and this brings it more to fruition. Civilizations should ally and compete against their contemporaries. As a gamer, I would rather my civilization be relevant to every era of the game. The new Leaders mechanic looks great for creativity in how you build your kit. Graphics look incredible
That's what I was saying = ) Civ 5 balanced wide vs tall by promoting tall. Civ 6 was just super wide. 7 feels like we could be returning to 5 esc mechanics
Tbf Civilizations evolve over time throughout history. The Roman Empire despite falling, it continued onwards through the Eastern and Western Roman Empires. The Chinese civilization today is not the same as it once was in Ancient China. Just because civilizations change, does not discount the efforts made in the past.
Because civilisations change over time. I don't think there is a single civilisation that has stood unchanged over millennia. Even ancient civilisations that still exist today like China and India are vastly different today from what they used to be. I can see how odd it can feel to start a game as the Aztects, then become Mongolia and end the game as America. But in my opinion, if it opens up diversity and flexibility in gameplay, then I'm willing to take that
I agree - I think they made a misstep. Change the Leader, not the Civilisation... Although, definitely also evolve that civilisation, keep the same name, or have the historical path name though... As GameTheory observed.
@@NikolaHoward I hear of a logical benefit of having changing Civs is a means to instantly know what the player should look out for regarding said opposing Civ. For example, when you see "Mongolia", there's an easy expectation of their play style. Despite them not being Mongolia in the previous age. Keeping the Civ names the same only makes things needlessly confusing in a gameplay standpoint.
Looks like humankind, seems to have pinched a chunk of ideas from humankind, i hated humankind 😂 I realise things have to change in a new game, but i wont be rushing for this, thats for sure.
That’s not how game design works, and that’s not how it has ever worked. Every game in a genre borrows ideas from other games, often innovating on them, and adding new things in.
@@UrsaRyan no I want it as a new game mods don’t really change the game that much style wise or gameplay wise I want civ 4 and civ 5 mixed together this new district shit is boring along with all the other features of civ 6 I don’t want to sink 100 hours into a new civ game just to learn all the stupid ins and outs of wat works and doesn’t I don’t have time, I like the natural disasters but that’s about it , it doesn’t feel like civ anymore it feels like it’s more like all the other turnbases styles games humankind for example civ 4 was the best followed by the simplicity but fun civ 5 so why not have the gameplay of civ 5 updated graphics and the features of civ 4, I’ll be playing civ 5 until this comes out
@@lim4091 civ 4 is one of the highest rated games of all time civ 5 was a more easy user friendly version of the game using graphics that actually looks pleasing, realism not some cartoony bs that makes your eyes bleed civ 5 interface with updated realistic looking graphics a lot more unique civ units and civ leaders maybe even add the addition to create armies like on revolution but not mad stacking you’ve got to assign specific units together for example 2x infantry tanks and a commander/general creates a regiment could do this with navy and Ariel fleets too civ 4/5 was peak civ and any true civ fan would say this so why change something that wasn’t broken I realise they’re mods for these things but I want a base game with these features not rely on tge community to make your game better like bethesda
If they never went far from their roots then there wouldn't be a point in making a new game. If all the game had were better graphics, better AI and small reworks of various systems, it would just be Civilisation 6.5. if that's what you want, the previous games still all exist for you to enjoy, and there are plenty of mods that allow you to customise your experience as well.
@@gametheory3458 The game changed a lot over the years, I'm saying like someone who played since the first game in the 90-s. In terms of gameplay, strategy, mechanics etc civ6 is drastically different from civ1, there's no denying this. Yet, it managed to keep its essence, the ability to create some crazy alternative reality where, for example, United States exist since stone age or some Native American tribe conquers the world, and there are godly leaders who live for millenia. Mess with this part, and you've got another game. I'm not saying it's something bad, it's just not civ any more.
![เปิดใจ “ต้นหอม ศกุนตลา” หลังโดนพาดพิงธุรกิจที่เคยทำ และผลกระทบทำถูกปลดฟ้าผ่า! | แฉ 24 ต.ค.67 [2/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vCi5OIqlxaE/mqdefault.jpg)
th-cam.com/video/7VXbFxM3fls/w-d-xo.html
Only 175 drawings left.
😭😭😭
We can do it!!!
@@UrsaRyan 😌❤️
If they add Norway as a culture, they need crusader king Sigird. Went all the way from Scandinavia down to the Mediterranean wrecking house wherever he went then returned via land from Byzantium and giving his ships and some men (into the Varangian guard) to the emperor.
Thank you for all the time and effort you put in explaining civ 7!
You're very welcome!! Thanks so much for your support, it's much appreciated!! :)
I was stupid excitrd for navigable rivers, but really dislike the humankind aspects and excited for less micromanagement... mixed feelings
Mixed is ok! Navigable rivers worked really well I must say
I prefer the look of the civ VI leaders... hopefully they keep working on the new models
@@natejones813 some cartoony bs that makes your eyes bleed real good look I prefer the look of civ 4 leaders to that
Starting with Brazil's music was a great choice!
RIP court of love. Domination seems weird if having over x cities cause problems. Cant wait to see how this works
Yes I can't wait to see what late game city cap numbers look like
I would imagine that the city cap relates to a administrative limit for the empire. Also finally gives a reason to raze instead of capture.
Did weather and natural disasters make it into the game? I love the feeling of having a living world that feels organic like it could be a real version of history. I want the planet to feel real and i think better disasters and natural events helps with that.
Looks like it did from the trailer. Tornados and volcanos exploding. And it looked like some sort of storm.
Yes! I saw volcanoes, hurricanes, tornadoes, lightning and flooding - and desert storms I think?
Absolutely mixed feelings. If you love the old games of course there will be something you miss in civ 7. But I don't think the hate will be half as strong as the hate civ 5 got back in the day. With expansions it turned out to be a pretty good game :)
Getting a humankind vibe from this
No no no , the guy said "Something no one else is doing, something only Firaxis can do".... They didnt copy anything, promise....
@@joshuamiller4319that was the art director talking about the visuals for the game. Please have faith in the team
@@DeSackOfPotatoes I have been a lover of Civilization since Civ III and I do hope this is another hit. I have serious doubts after this video though. The art design does look improved over Civ 6, I like that cliffs are now actual parts of the landscape and can be inland. However, again, you will notice its very similar is style and function as Humankind's maps. My worry is more that this is imitation rather than inspiration.
I like how in game you can choose “democracy” as your government but everything goes as you say… 😃 Don’t say it is unrealistic. That is just how my home country Turkey is governed today.
Honestly my main problem is the 3 ages is just not for me
Considering most games end around the industrial age or sooner, 3 ages sounds good to experience more. It just depends on how they handle the new ages mechanics of legacies.
so far it sounds like the antiquity age will be able to be a "complete" game on its own in the way that we can currently get to the medieval era or so and see the writing on the wall and players will abandon the save.
Each age is 150 to 200 turns - they're going to feel pretty epic in size
@@UrsaRyan , it's just It's such a weird metric for ages, I like the more classical classifications, like bronze, iron, feudalism, renaissance etc
I personally like Civ 6 art style, but all of the criticisms towards it might have motivated the artists to make Civ 7 even more beautiful than ever.
The Ages is an excellent change. They said it: "we are trying to teach through this game." Historical emersion is a core value of the Civilization series, and this brings it more to fruition. Civilizations should ally and compete against their contemporaries. As a gamer, I would rather my civilization be relevant to every era of the game. The new Leaders mechanic looks great for creativity in how you build your kit. Graphics look incredible
Well I know now what I will get for my Birthday in February xD
Happy birthday in advance!
Is the song in the background “waltzing Matilda “?
The Roman leader looks like a better Ellen
I wanna know if the ai is improved?
Can you plot and assassinate important enemy characters in the new version?
Civ V was anti-wide discrimination all day, every DLC. What are you on about?!
That's what I was saying = ) Civ 5 balanced wide vs tall by promoting tall. Civ 6 was just super wide. 7 feels like we could be returning to 5 esc mechanics
tf i thought you were a bear
Huzzah!
If no university of sankore 0/10
Woah ursa is a qutie pie and no one told me?!!
o.0
I don't understand, in a game called Civilization, why would you want to change Civs at the end of an age?
Civilizations
Tbf Civilizations evolve over time throughout history. The Roman Empire despite falling, it continued onwards through the Eastern and Western Roman Empires.
The Chinese civilization today is not the same as it once was in Ancient China.
Just because civilizations change, does not discount the efforts made in the past.
Because civilisations change over time. I don't think there is a single civilisation that has stood unchanged over millennia. Even ancient civilisations that still exist today like China and India are vastly different today from what they used to be.
I can see how odd it can feel to start a game as the Aztects, then become Mongolia and end the game as America. But in my opinion, if it opens up diversity and flexibility in gameplay, then I'm willing to take that
I agree - I think they made a misstep. Change the Leader, not the Civilisation...
Although, definitely also evolve that civilisation, keep the same name, or have the historical path name though...
As GameTheory observed.
@@NikolaHoward I hear of a logical benefit of having changing Civs is a means to instantly know what the player should look out for regarding said opposing Civ.
For example, when you see "Mongolia", there's an easy expectation of their play style. Despite them not being Mongolia in the previous age. Keeping the Civ names the same only makes things needlessly confusing in a gameplay standpoint.
Algo comment
🖖
muted?
Looks like humankind, seems to have pinched a chunk of ideas from humankind, i hated humankind 😂 I realise things have to change in a new game, but i wont be rushing for this, thats for sure.
That’s not how game design works, and that’s not how it has ever worked. Every game in a genre borrows ideas from other games, often innovating on them, and adding new things in.
@@lim4091 👍 k.
@@ehcoroche you’re welcome. Enjoy Civ 7!
Thefts 😢
It's not civ if I can't play as one nation to stand the test of time.
I just want civ 5 gameplay with new updated graphics, a more advanced combat system and smarter ai that’s it
Sounds like you need civ 5 mods!!
@@UrsaRyan no I want it as a new game mods don’t really change the game that much style wise or gameplay wise I want civ 4 and civ 5 mixed together this new district shit is boring along with all the other features of civ 6 I don’t want to sink 100 hours into a new civ game just to learn all the stupid ins and outs of wat works and doesn’t I don’t have time, I like the natural disasters but that’s about it , it doesn’t feel like civ anymore it feels like it’s more like all the other turnbases styles games humankind for example civ 4 was the best followed by the simplicity but fun civ 5 so why not have the gameplay of civ 5 updated graphics and the features of civ 4, I’ll be playing civ 5 until this comes out
Updated civ 5 sounds astoundingly boring to me
@@lim4091 civ 4 is one of the highest rated games of all time civ 5 was a more easy user friendly version of the game using graphics that actually looks pleasing, realism not some cartoony bs that makes your eyes bleed civ 5 interface with updated realistic looking graphics a lot more unique civ units and civ leaders maybe even add the addition to create armies like on revolution but not mad stacking you’ve got to assign specific units together for example 2x infantry tanks and a commander/general creates a regiment could do this with navy and Ariel fleets too civ 4/5 was peak civ and any true civ fan would say this so why change something that wasn’t broken
I realise they’re mods for these things but I want a base game with these features not rely on tge community to make your game better like bethesda
Finally they went far enough from their roots it's not a Civ game any more. It's just more AAA humankind with better graphics.
Gives room for Ara to shine
If they never went far from their roots then there wouldn't be a point in making a new game. If all the game had were better graphics, better AI and small reworks of various systems, it would just be Civilisation 6.5. if that's what you want, the previous games still all exist for you to enjoy, and there are plenty of mods that allow you to customise your experience as well.
@@gametheory3458 The game changed a lot over the years, I'm saying like someone who played since the first game in the 90-s. In terms of gameplay, strategy, mechanics etc civ6 is drastically different from civ1, there's no denying this. Yet, it managed to keep its essence, the ability to create some crazy alternative reality where, for example, United States exist since stone age or some Native American tribe conquers the world, and there are godly leaders who live for millenia. Mess with this part, and you've got another game. I'm not saying it's something bad, it's just not civ any more.