Beam Deflections - Double Integration Method Example (Part 3/3) - Structural Analysis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
  • Finishing up the example problem for the beam deflection calculation using the double integration. Solving for the remaining constants.

ความคิดเห็น • 90

  • @zannettos
    @zannettos 9 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    I love your videos!!! Those silly jokes light up the mood and i learn more in 20 mins watching your videos than 1hour of a university lecture.

  • @ive7908
    @ive7908 12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you. You sound really enthusiastic on your explanations, it makes me feel more positive about my homework :-)

  • @structurefree
    @structurefree  12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks for watching.

  • @alexfedal980
    @alexfedal980 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Btw I love the way you speak,It just makes the lesson more fun.Specially bammmmmm dammmmm thank you maaaaaaaaaaaaammmm lol.

  • @mimiabraham8192
    @mimiabraham8192 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    such a great lecture , started a new course which needed us to revise this method. One of the best videos to refresh your memory thank you :)

  • @Zamri723
    @Zamri723 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you are one of my source of inspiration. May god bless you.

  • @zjyub
    @zjyub 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You Rock! I hope to some day be working under you after I graduate.

  • @mow9986
    @mow9986 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    My structural savior!!! So simple and so clear~

  • @Vulturee97
    @Vulturee97 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the most funny lectures i have ever seen ! too bad im not going to watch your videos again cuz im passing that lesson :D

  • @nightgaming466
    @nightgaming466 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos are just Big WOOW. Keep up good work.

  • @fallonmorrell1417
    @fallonmorrell1417 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was incredibly helpful. I'm about to write an exam on this stuff and it didn't make sense till now. GOD BLESS!!!!!!

  • @structurefree
    @structurefree  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm glad it was useful.

  • @Zamri723
    @Zamri723 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    keep up the good work . you are a savior

  • @Shabbash
    @Shabbash 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're a legend over here at Strathclyde Uni in Glasgow mate!!!

  • @Svx_6
    @Svx_6 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you ,please continue

  • @jaredcallaghan4737
    @jaredcallaghan4737 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    boys from Australia love it, cheers mate!

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Au-shizzle-stral-izzle....whasssupp!

  • @hassantariq6730
    @hassantariq6730 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    best channel 😍

  • @nahigan1
    @nahigan1 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you sir are a godsend

  • @TheKoalaProduction
    @TheKoalaProduction 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    saved my life man

  • @dunsrav7846
    @dunsrav7846 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are really good... Got some stuff in my head now :) Thanks

  • @Ryan1234Griffin
    @Ryan1234Griffin 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great example! as always.... Thank you very much

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Ryan Griffin you are very welcome. thank you for the kind words.

  • @BeryBelloney
    @BeryBelloney 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    2020 Thanks... U made this sound easy :)

  • @BIGCGOODFELLO20
    @BIGCGOODFELLO20 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't understand a word my professor says so thanks for the videos.

  • @jamesgesell9176
    @jamesgesell9176 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent explanation

  • @siavash2c
    @siavash2c 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks man, you're a savior \m/

  • @maryamali996
    @maryamali996 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful THANKS!

  • @Samcanplaymusic
    @Samcanplaymusic 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video man

  • @UTOUCHEDMYLiFE
    @UTOUCHEDMYLiFE 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is great. I learned a lot :) Thanks sir!!

  • @qaiskhader730
    @qaiskhader730 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    YOU ARE AWESOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOME
    thx a lot

  • @prameshkathoke
    @prameshkathoke 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    so what exactly is the answer?

    • @sabesta
      @sabesta 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If they ask for deflection and angle at right end of beam, you would plug 0 in for x2 in equations 3 and 4 and solve for theta/phi. Because the end of the beam from right end is a value of x2 = 0m based on his specified coordinate system. But if you wanted to solve for 2m from start of beam at the left, you would plug in x1 = 2m into equations 1 and 2 and then solve for unknown variable.
      This video is kind of confusing because he doesn't ask for anything specific in the question, he just solves the 4 equations and leaves it open. You could solve for deflection/angle at any point on the beam as long as you plug in the correct value of x1 or x2 that corresponds with the locations you are trying to solve for. So it depends on what location(s) your prof asks for in your question.

  • @KavinduJayasekara
    @KavinduJayasekara 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great !! It Helped a lot

  • @rivakhatiwada5234
    @rivakhatiwada5234 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    It helped a lot . Thank you same so so much .

  • @GeneralMatt12
    @GeneralMatt12 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    These videos are dope

  • @T_Mike
    @T_Mike 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the vids, nice work!! BC's finally make sense :)

  • @weskentocy
    @weskentocy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    great you explained so well in slope1 = -slope2, but that is a very headache stuff for me to find x value with power greater than 3, the 4, 5, 6+++++++

  • @alexcancell4454
    @alexcancell4454 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you're the man

  • @vantablackx7673
    @vantablackx7673 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    more tutorials please, frames.

  • @Tukur01010
    @Tukur01010 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    could you please do a part 4 to calculate max deflection coz i gets tricky you wouldn't know which of the equations you use

  • @ben-greenspan
    @ben-greenspan 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much, incredibly helpful

  • @zhengyangsong
    @zhengyangsong 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Many Many Thanks!!!!!!!!

  • @sidescrollin
    @sidescrollin 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    put this in your playlist please!

  • @nabeel9726
    @nabeel9726 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if we wanted to find the elastic curve for this beam, do we just add all the equations together.?

  • @0YasirArafeh0
    @0YasirArafeh0 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    شكرا ,,شرح ممتاز

  • @fffffffffffff1
    @fffffffffffff1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot, great upload. Subscribed!

  • @frankvalenti9120
    @frankvalenti9120 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you are 2AWSOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      frank valenti 2 legit 2 quit.

  • @kevinoconnell5134
    @kevinoconnell5134 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    great vids!

  • @AndyXGumede
    @AndyXGumede 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @mreagle8770
    @mreagle8770 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    at the end (5:00) you say that units work out because all the units of the deflection equation are kn.M^3 but what happens to the kN/m and kn.m^2?

    • @Kruuppe
      @Kruuppe 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +shahrukh Nadeem For the kN/m , when you divide by EI you will get kN/m^3 , but you will multiply by x^4(take another look at the equation. x is in m) and its a similar situation with kN.m^2 where dividing by EI cancels the kN.m^2 but there is an x that multiplies with that unit.
      Sorry for explaining it poorly.

  • @jamisonralph4698
    @jamisonralph4698 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So if the question asks to calculate the maximum deflection, we'd just solve equation 4 @x=10? or would we have to add that with equation 2@ x=5 ?

  • @alexfedal980
    @alexfedal980 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great!

  • @msuasj1695
    @msuasj1695 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great !

  • @rabihhawwa2734
    @rabihhawwa2734 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those boundary conditions are confusing me a bit, so basically for every change in the moment diagram we get 2 more constants? Hope u reply soon got my exam tomorrow haha really helpful video thanks!

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      pretty much. we need two boundary conditions per moment function.

    • @rabihhawwa2734
      @rabihhawwa2734 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh and for each major change in moment it gives us a moment function? Not sure what im saying missing lectures is horrible...

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rabih Hawwa I'd recommend reviewing how to write moment functions from statics, then jumping into double integration method.

    • @rabihhawwa2734
      @rabihhawwa2734 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Took statics 2 years ago im in my 3rd year now so i dont really remember much i quickly jumped to structure made an issue for me :/ but thanks for ur help and ur videos are awesome keep posting them haha!

  • @wukf1
    @wukf1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice, i like when you say " baaaaam"
    anyway, EI is in units of kN mm^2 now, i think then need to be changed or just change the meter to be consistent. am i right ?

  • @rugbyrocks123321
    @rugbyrocks123321 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    So the E is in GPa and the I is in mm^4, do we keep them in those units?

  • @boywamushadha
    @boywamushadha 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    what if the beam isnt a cantilever beam and is instead a simply supported beam which a force of say 20KN on both supports?

  • @engrjace
    @engrjace 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks bro. yo da man!

  • @crackingfan112
    @crackingfan112 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i know this is an old video, but could you not have done (from the x2 reference) V(10) = 0 and theta(10)=0? i mean using the coordinate system it makes sense...

    • @lailanabil6169
      @lailanabil6169 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was thinking the same way but I am not sure ?

  • @pranavsawant1439
    @pranavsawant1439 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks man :D

  • @richardjonson1694
    @richardjonson1694 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome!!!

  • @tullao1979
    @tullao1979 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How did you derive the boundary condition -theta1(5m)=theta2(5m) ? Looking at the beam it doesn't make sense why one should be negative of the other since it's technically the same angle...

    • @roshan002
      @roshan002 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +tullao1979 Check out part two of this series. He clearly states his coordinate system starts on two different ends of the beam resulting in opposite slopes hence the negative sign.

  • @yasirhussein3063
    @yasirhussein3063 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi mr. check out your si units is not correct i.e you write moment of x2 is KN/m instead of KNm and the si unit value of C4 is KNm power 4 which can not be added with other constant value

  • @bannaghbeg
    @bannaghbeg 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    hi how do you calculate the maximum deflection?

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      bannaghbeg finding location of maximum deflection is like finding the critical point...in most cases, where the slope is zero is a location of max. deflection. The ends of cantilever beams are one exception.

    • @icyburger
      @icyburger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      3:26 I think you made a mistake when finding c4... You put a negative sign on the right side of the equation.

    • @coolbuu1
      @coolbuu1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      i think you're 2 years too late

  • @Eoz184
    @Eoz184 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So the answer for both slope and deflection have two equations? Or should I plus them together?

    • @Eoz184
      @Eoz184 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Wang Zirui I am confused because there's the same problem in the book but without numbers. If I use the number in this example, the slope and deflection at free end in the book equals to the answer from equations in M2(x2) in this example. Why the answer is that but not add two slope equations together and use x1=10m, x2=0m?

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Please don't put them together. The functions only work between their respective discontinuities.

  • @soumybrata
    @soumybrata 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow.....awesome :D thnx a lot :)

  • @mattgauci5871
    @mattgauci5871 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    For the cut where the dist load is i chose the LHS so that included vertical reaction and moment at A. Then u get a different moment function M2(x2). Does this matter/affect the final equations ?

  • @victorrodriguez3583
    @victorrodriguez3583 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    So is the final answer only theta 2 and V2 and not theta 1 and V1? Thanks.

    • @DacoRoo
      @DacoRoo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      for others that may wonder about this.....Because those were found in step 4. They both equal 0 because they are at a fixed end.

  • @icyburger
    @icyburger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are you a professor, structurefree?

  • @DacoRoo
    @DacoRoo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I for theta 2, I got 5.2e^-9m. for v2, I got -1.519e^-8 KN. Anyone else get that? My prof never has EI's that large so the numbers seem weird to me.

  • @willm3823
    @willm3823 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    clutch af

  • @nishantrana1994
    @nishantrana1994 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    _/\_ just awesome

  • @bowlocurry
    @bowlocurry 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    damn cartesia!