Thanks ! Majority of my personal portfolio is in globally diversified index funds, so my personal returns don't deviate very much from the overall market
Hey, plz test Walter Schloss Price to Book! Also, Joel Greenblatt did a study where stocks with P/E < 5 and P/BV < 0.85 destroyed the market over a ten year period - would be nice to see how that held up over a more recent stretch. Thanks!!
1% over the index is pretty underwhelming though. And it’s hard to define this as a strategy, it’s just screening for healthy stocks in certain sectors. Like have a good ROIC and be able to cover debts. It’s not really a strategy but rather screening wouldn’t you agree? The best returns are gained and this is controversial, but you do want to buy mainly when the market is having a bad year or bad trend. More likely to get fair prices.
I think most people would be perfectly happy with 1% over an index given the majority can even beat it. Depends how you define a "strategy", anything can be a strategy even if it's just filtering stocks. I don't see a difference personally
Interesting. Well I always wanted to back test Companies with high ROIC and its good to see the results that most of them do better.
Hi! Just commenting for the algorithm, you deserve way more subs! Great upgrade on the delisted companies, definitely a big plus
Hopefully Bill C11 will push your insightful non-watered down financial content to more Canadians
Lol we shall see
Bill C11 is not what they told you I'm afraid.
I would be interested in seeing a back test on Charles Arke method
I would use R2 or R2V instead of the s&p as a BM
Best investment channel! If you dont mind whats your average annual returns?
Thanks ! Majority of my personal portfolio is in globally diversified index funds, so my personal returns don't deviate very much from the overall market
@@investingsucks which index funds exactly? Thanks!
@@investingsucks😂
@@Max-ej3po Several... but XEQT is the big one
Hey, plz test Walter Schloss Price to Book! Also, Joel Greenblatt did a study where stocks with P/E < 5 and P/BV < 0.85 destroyed the market over a ten year period - would be nice to see how that held up over a more recent stretch. Thanks!!
Interesting... Thanks for the ideas 💡
1% over the index is pretty underwhelming though.
And it’s hard to define this as a strategy, it’s just screening for healthy stocks in certain sectors. Like have a good ROIC and be able to cover debts. It’s not really a strategy but rather screening wouldn’t you agree?
The best returns are gained and this is controversial, but you do want to buy mainly when the market is having a bad year or bad trend. More likely to get fair prices.
I think most people would be perfectly happy with 1% over an index given the majority can even beat it. Depends how you define a "strategy", anything can be a strategy even if it's just filtering stocks. I don't see a difference personally
Well that's exactly what he said in the video. He doesn't use this filter to simply buy but to screen for further research.
Net Fcf
Hey hey
Hello!