Anattā: What is Non-Self? - Why You Don't Really Exist? | Buddhism Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 เม.ย. 2024
  • Anattā: What is Non-Self? - Why You Don't Really Exist? Buddhism Explained
    #anatta #nonself #self #ego #buddhism #buddhisminenglish #buddhismpodcast #wisdom
    Chapter 1. What is the Doctrine of Anattā?
    Chapter 2. The Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta (Discourse on the Not-Self Characteristic)
    Chapter 3. Non-Self and the Theory of Dependent Origination
    The doctrine of Anattā or Non-self is a natural consequence, or inference, from the analysis of the Five Aggregates (Skandhas) and the teaching of Dependent Origination (Paticca-samuppāda). What we call a soul or individual is made up of five aggregates, and when we analyze and examine them closely, there is nothing behind them that can be called I, Ātman, Self, or any other permanent entity. This is the method of analysis. We arrive at a similar result when examining the principle of Dependent Origination, the method of synthesis, and according to this principle, nothing in the world is absolute. All phenomena (dharmas) are limited, relative, and interdependent. This is the doctrine of relativity in Buddhism.

ความคิดเห็น • 101

  • @user-ck6ji6qu7k
    @user-ck6ji6qu7k 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    As a born Buddhist I clearly state this is the best and perfect explanation I heard in English. Thanks a lot Sir, for your efforts and awareness.

  • @jeniprishantha8328
    @jeniprishantha8328 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Thank you for the good attempt to explain what really non self means in Buddism...I am a Buddhist by birth. Sure, a human or any animal for that matter is a union of both the body and the mind. It is very clear that body decays and so not permanant.Almost no arguement there...What is most difficult to digest is that mind is impermanent. Buddhism disects the mind into smaller parts, analyzes it and shows us the mind also has nothing in it, only a mirage. The day we fully understand (don't it is quite the right term) it we are liberated or attained Nirwana the ultimate bliss as explained in Buddhism.AsBuddha Himself preached "Health is the greatest profit,, Happiness is the greatest wealth, Confidence is the greatest relation, Nirwana is the ultimate bliss ".May all be able to reach that goal..!

    • @EgoPodcastenglish
      @EgoPodcastenglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you, @jeniprishantha8328, for your thoughtful reflection on the Buddhist concept of non-self (Anatta) and the nature of the mind. You’ve articulated very clearly the challenge many face in accepting the impermanence of the mind, which is often harder to grasp than the impermanence of the physical body. Buddhism indeed teaches us to see the mind as a series of changing conditions and processes, not a fixed entity, which can be both a profound and a challenging realization.
      Your mention of the ultimate liberation through understanding this concept touches the core of Buddhist teaching-the path to Nirvana. Buddha’s words remind us that true health, happiness, and security come from this deep understanding and liberation from our misconceived notions of self.
      May your journey towards this deep understanding continue to be fruitful, and may your insights inspire others in our community to explore these teachings more deeply. If you have any personal experiences or additional thoughts on how this understanding has impacted your life or practices that have helped you along this path, please share them. Your contributions are invaluable to all of us seeking to understand and apply Buddha’s teachings in our lives.

    • @buddhaexhumed9922
      @buddhaexhumed9922 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Namo Buddhay.

  • @narendralodhia
    @narendralodhia 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Glory to Lord Buddha.

    • @buddhaexhumed9922
      @buddhaexhumed9922 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Glory to Lord Buddha. Namo Buddhay Namaste 🙏

  • @terrencewijeratne6197
    @terrencewijeratne6197 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    superb videos sir. anitya means things change every second, so too our bodies. nothing remains the same. stay blessed.

  • @ikkong8436
    @ikkong8436 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    If i may make a humble correction here. The second mental aggregate after Vedana (feeling) is Saññā (perception) not Sankara and following that then is Sankara (mental formation or volitional formation as translated by Ven Bikkhu Bodhi). Still i must say this video is most enlightening. Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu,,🙏🙏🙏

  • @user-sn7ct2bn8i
    @user-sn7ct2bn8i 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Perfectly explained about the roots of អនិច្ចំ ទុក្ខំ​ ​អន្តា​Impermanence Dukha and Anatta. Can you please do video on the mindsets that consist of 89 cores (briefs) or 110 cores (details)? I have hard times understanding the concepts how they lead or link interchangeably. I have spent over 9 years studying Buddhism by learning how to free myself from the space while feeding this Ruppa that never be grateful of my daily services. It’s so precious to learn over and over again. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻​ May you be on your journey to achieve peace!

  • @kzantal
    @kzantal 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Dependent origination is not a circle. If it were so, ignorance would depend on death. This issue arises when trying to interpret dependent origination in a temporal way when it is in fact atemporal. The most important thing to understand is the general principle, which is what the Buddha discovered: when this is, that is; when this arises, that arises... ". It is about the simultaneous presence of two phenomena. One depends on the other. This insight can be applied to our experience to realise that nothing in our experience is independent. Everything depends on smth else that we don't control. E. G. : we usually think in terms of "my sights". Yet, without a working eye, is there seeing? No. Can we keep this working eye forever? No. It can be taken away at any time! So these sights are not truly ours and never were ours.

  • @vintageb8
    @vintageb8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    the text captions are wrong all over the place!!

  • @paramasadguru1618
    @paramasadguru1618 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Vedanta speaks about three types of “I-s”. [1] The first one is Universal “I” or Universal Consciousness, Pāramārthika Satta; [2] the second one is the ‘ego-I’ for which intellect is the center; and [3] the third one is the ‘mental I’, which is vyāvahārika satta. Buddha categorically speaks only about [2] and [3]: and whenever question was asked about the First One, he said “that can never be explained but can only be experienced by the one who has crossed the threshold of mind and matter. Whenever he spoke about ‘anatta’, he only meant the 2nd and the 3rd ‘I-s’ and never the First One. He never denied the existence of CONSCIOUSNESS. Whenever he spoke about ‘anatta’ he referred it to [1] roopa [the physical body], [2] vinyana [chidabhasa or chithchaaya], [3] sanya [perceprion], [4] vedana [sensations] and [5]samskara [impressions carried forward in the form of vāsanās]. He explained that attachment to these five ‘khandās’ as duhkha- suffering [pancha upadana khanda duhkha]. He experienced Ultimate Eternal Happiness after his Enlightenment. This absolute state of Eternal Happiness is called in Vedanta as “Sath-Chith-Ananda- blissful conscious existence”. This Supreme State according to Buddha is “Jnaana mattaaya, patisathi mattaaya” and according to Vedanta it is “Parabrahman or Paramatma, known as I AM- Aham Asmi”. Whenever this gets ‘reflected’ in our intellect, IT is known as Atma- the subtlest feeling of “I Am”, which pulsates in every human being as “pure beingness”.

    • @buddhaexhumed9922
      @buddhaexhumed9922 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Namo Buddhay.

    • @Nature_Lover-do7vf
      @Nature_Lover-do7vf 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Enlightenment is the end of existence, as we learned. Nothing exist after that, like how the flame of a lamp is extinguished.

    • @buddhaexhumed9922
      @buddhaexhumed9922 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Nature_Lover-do7vf true

    • @buddhaexhumed9922
      @buddhaexhumed9922 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Nature_Lover-do7vf true. Namo Buddhay Namaste🙏.

    • @paramasadguru1618
      @paramasadguru1618 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Nature_Lover-do7vf Enlightenment is the end of ignorance that "I Am the body, I Am in the body and the body is mine" and not Existence. Here body means not only the physical body but also subtle body and the causal body. If you say "nothing exists after that" it means the theory of annihilism, which Buddha opposed. In the very words of Buddha, "Liberation and Enlightenment do not exist outside of your own Self. We need only open our eyes to see that we ourselves are the very essence of Liberation and Enlightenment". This is the "essence' which is referred to as Existence. Can you deny or negate your own Existence?

  • @mattmaxwell7772
    @mattmaxwell7772 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Love your videos! Unfortunately, in this one, where you are saying "the I", the subtitles mostly say "the eye", which could be confusing for an initiate to the Four Noble Truths.

    • @EgoPodcastenglish
      @EgoPodcastenglish  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Thank you for your kind words and for pointing out the subtitle error, Matt! Clarity is crucial, especially when discussing complex concepts like Anattā (non-self). We’ll make sure to correct this to avoid any confusion in the future. Appreciate your attention to detail and helping us improve our content! 🙏

    • @mattmaxwell7772
      @mattmaxwell7772 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@EgoPodcastenglish 🙏🙏🙏

  • @digitalmagic475
    @digitalmagic475 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Wow! I never thought that someone can explain this so beautiful so nice thank you so much

  • @ElmerTan-ut4qn
    @ElmerTan-ut4qn หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why Buddha and Bodhisattva can get along well with all sentient beings throughout space and the Dharma Realm?
    All Buddhas and Bodhisattvas have no self.
    No self means, don't have my thoughts, don't have my view, don't have my distinction, and don't have my attachments.
    🙏🙏🙏

  • @excelsioresquire
    @excelsioresquire 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Catechism of The Buddhist Doctrine
    Primarily in Buddhism it is compulsory to accept Rebirth & KARMA (Wholesome or Unwholesome Commitments) though only voluntarily one should accept The Doctrine, purely through conviction.
    after accepting Buddhism purely through conviction. It’s mandatory to make 5 sacrifices or observe Five Precepts as a Layman,
    1. To Abstain from Killing, Harming or Endangering any kind of living beings.
    2. To Abstain from Stealing or taking what is not granted to you. Pilferage, Cheat ,Plunder, Pillage, Loot, etc;
    3. To Abstain from Committing Adultery or illegal sexual misbehavior.
    4. To Abstain from Falsehood, Pretend, Mendacity, Lying or Deceit. It’s v.important for Buddhists to refrain from falsehood as they seek the Truth.
    5. To Abstain from Intoxication or Narcotic Drug Abuse.
    Standards are of course higher and much more austere for a Novice Monk (like the Poverty vow, Strict Celibate living etc;)
    Unlike in all other major religions including Hinduism, Buddhism doesn’t accept a creator God but instead Evolution, according to the Commitment or KARMIC Force which enables the ideal situation.
    Eg; Wholesome Commitments will deliver pleasant or desirable births in a Celestial or Human birth or vis-à-vis in the case of Unwholesome Commitments. For whatsoever a man sows, that shall he also reap. (New Testament - Saint Paul)
    A rather short and precise emphasis would be, mentally and physical commitment or action(volition,consciously acting by purpose). Therefore what happens accidentally(unintentionally) doesn't create a payback situation.Although KARMIC reaction may not take place quite instantly but for surely in due time-course it will start paying retribution to the owner of it(Eg; if one plants an apple seed you wouldn't get apples over night, but certainly for sure it will give results at its fruition). It's mind foremost. Though Envy, Jealousy, Aversion, Covetousness and Ignorance are all evil and doesn't involve any physical action but it will definitely have a KARMIC reaction in a miserable realm as they are mindful commitments(intention) . Lord BUDDHA has mentioned the type of KARMA and its reactions are infinite. This subject of KARMA is a vast subject in Buddhism with lots of elaborations like the Cause & Effect Theory,
    · Dependent on the main cause ignorance , volitional (KARMIC) formations evolves.
    · Dependent on volitional formations, consciousness evolves.
    · Dependent on consciousness, mentality-materially(Mind & Matter) evolves.
    · Dependent on mentality-materially, the six sense faculties(Eye,Nose,Tongue,Ear,Body & Brain ) evolves .
    · Dependent on the the six sense faculties, contact evolves.
    · Dependent on contact, sensual feeling evolves.
    · Dependent on Sensual feeling, craving evolves.
    · Dependent on craving, clinging evolves.
    · Dependent on clinging, existence( Rebirth in*31 Realms ) evolves.
    · Dependent on existence, birth evolves.
    · Dependent on existence,decay,senility death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief and despair evolves
    * According to Buddhist Cosmology,Lord BUDDHA has mentioned that the number of Galaxies run in to infinity in 625 B.C, a Galaxy comprises of 31 realms of existence and they are, the 4 miserable Hell Realms (1.Animal 2.Goblin or the Hungry Ghostly Forms 3. Extra Gigantic Miserable Ghostly Forms 4. The 136 Hell realms full of torture found beneath the earth.)
    1 Human realm, 6 Celestial Heavenly realms, 20 Celestial Brahma realms(Super-mundane). Also Rebirth is quite different to Reincarnation which means the same person appearing again. According to Buddhism it’s NOT THE SAME or NOT ANOTHER Eg; Suppose Julius Caesar reborn currently as Prince Charles, he’s not Julius Caesar now ,but no one else either but a generation of the Cycle of Birth & Death of a being.
    We're driven by Greed, Hatred and Delusion the 3 evil KARMIC roots embedded in our minds which doesn't need any nourishment, the downward currents fueling our *cycle of birth and death (*SAMSARIC SOJOURN) which causes immense suffering to us. So the perfect solution or the antidote prescribed by The BUDDHA, is to engage our selves in acts of 1.Generosity, to nullify Greed. 2.To Contemplate on Loving Kindnesses and especially to Forgive one's Adversaries and Treacherous Enemies, this technique is to curtail the evil root of Anger, Animosity or Hatred and Jealousy which is embedded in our minds. 3.Finally to develop Wisdom through sheer Contemplative Meditation to make Ignorance obsolete. Ignorance which is the main reason for the existence of both other evil aspects Greed and Hatred. Both Greed and Hatred can't exist without Ignorance.
    Lord BUDDHA has taught us how to liberate our selves by contemplating on
    reality of the 1.The NATURAL PHENOMENON OF IMPERMANENCE(both Mind & Matter, arise to pass away or Appear to Disappear) 2.The NATURAL PHENOMENON OF SUFFERING(due to 1st phenomenon of Impermanence)
    3. The NATURAL PHENOMENON OF SOULLESSNESS (non continuity or non eternity.This is the most subtle phenomenon) and this technique of meditation is known as The INSIGHT MEDITATION which enables you to exterminate the KARMIC FORCE and would nullify your future existence in any of the *31 realms of existence in this Galaxy or in any other Galaxy (Lord BUDDHA has mentioned that the number of Galaxies run in to infinity in 625 B.C) a Galaxy comprises of * 31 realms of existence and they are, the 4 miserable Hell Realms (1.Animal 2.Goblin or the Hungry Ghostly Forms 3. Extra Gigantic Miserable Ghostly Forms 4. The 136 Hell realms full of torture found beneath the earth.)
    1 Human realm, 6 Celestial Heavenly realms, 20 Celestial Brahma realms(Super-mundane).
    And INSIGHT MEDITATION leads you to the emancipation of all suffering or
    NIRVANA( cessation of Birth, Decay, Illness,Death Lamentation and all forms of Suffering)
    Wherever Birth takes place it isn't NIRVANA and in NIRVANA there's no Birth taking
    place any more.
    "Transient alas are all component things
    Subject are they to birth & then decay
    Having gained birth to death the life flux swings
    Bliss truly dawns when unrest dies away"
    -The Buddha(Light of Asia. by Sir Edwin Arnold)

  • @lobsangjampa-ou9if
    @lobsangjampa-ou9if 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is truth at it's absolute

  • @MikeGsaxman
    @MikeGsaxman 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very clear - pity about the many errors in the displayed text.🙏

  • @mysonjimmy1337
    @mysonjimmy1337 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    Some of those Buddha word's sounded same Cambodia 🇰🇭 aknata, tuka ,sangka, 😊❤sankrit words

  • @System-change-SL
    @System-change-SL 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Aggregates are just a form. Problem with us is that we never see this ultimate truth as the reality. That's why we think, it's me and mine doing aggregats. Once you start establishing this impermanence consciousness as permanent me and mine, that's the cause for making you suffering. Because, definitely nothing is permanent. This permanent thought will end up with sorrow, even it will provide a temporary happiness at present/

  • @System-change-SL
    @System-change-SL 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What Buddha found was the phenomenon of nature, the cause and effect. The nature only exists by two components.
    1. Energy
    2. Mass
    Any creature has both mass and energy, simultaneously. Energy needs for recognising any thing as a mass. It could be as a vision, as a hearing, as a smelling, as a tasting or as a touching. This action is working on a simple equation. If energy available there is a possibility of rising a thought. Any rising though wouldn't be able to retain, it's rise and fall in every moment of a being.
    This rising but falling thought is the everything we recognise as the world.
    If this occurs this occurs. If this not occurs this not occurs. This finding is what make Siddhartha to be called him as Govthama Buddha. He named it as Paticcasamupada, the theory of the nature, cause and effect.
    Our existence is all about a rise and fall of a thought. Death body has mass but no energy simultaneously. That's why it can't think, it is simply dead.
    If we understand there is no self unless we create it as again a thought, there will not be suffering anymore. Why, who wants to hold this rise and fall moment of thought? What's the point of holding this nature of impermanence? It's always impermanent. If you are trying to hold this impermanence generation of a mass, either it is a vision, a hearing, a smelling, a tasting or a touching, that's the case for suffering. Simply it's not possible to keep without changing. It's the nature.
    If one can fully get out from this cause of suffering by contemplating this nature's reality, one wouldn't be suffering at all. That's the Buddha status. He is not dead but he lives happily without make him suffering until the end of lifespan. That's the end of cycle of rebirth.
    We may not be able to reach that ultimate but we can go closer by understanding and contemplating the reality of the impermanence nature. It is not rocket science but you need to use the energy you have brought in as a human being to understand and contemplate in this lifespan. Please try, you will feel the change 🙏.

  • @jayanthahathnagoda437
    @jayanthahathnagoda437 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    read girimananda sutta which explains anaththa signal ( sangha).

  • @lankaninternational1120
    @lankaninternational1120 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All I's come from the 1, anything that Seperated from the 1 is subject to decay, therefore not lasting..which leads to suffering

  • @ShehanimasheDassanayake-md3to
    @ShehanimasheDassanayake-md3to 14 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Buddha is not real. But this philosophy created by humans are definitely real . 😌 Life should have never been there in the first place. By understanding that nothing is for ever . Or nothing really matters we can finally understand the depth of life. 😌

  • @smlanka4u
    @smlanka4u หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The effort to gain ownership comes from views with a pain. Greed makes rebirth/Citta from moment to moment.

  • @azalia423
    @azalia423 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for. I very much appreciate it. (The music is distracting and feels tonally off. It would seem that buddhism is a subject that can trust silence.)

  • @jamilscherief8652
    @jamilscherief8652 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Too bad the video uses EYE instead of I - as in the "I" thought. Important distinction I think.

    • @EgoPodcastenglish
      @EgoPodcastenglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We apologize for this unfortunate incident

    • @kangbengkok
      @kangbengkok 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Yes, similarly on "nama rupa" "nama" has been translated as name. Shouldn't it be "mind"?

  • @karshrithar815
    @karshrithar815 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My doubt is that, in the rebirth, suppose if my earlier birth mother or sister becomes wife in the present birth what will happen and who will come to know that

  • @mujaku
    @mujaku 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    In Buddhism the first noble truth of suffering has to do with the psychophysical body consisting of five aggregates, namely, material shape (rūpa), feeling (vedanā), perception (saṃjñā), volitional formations (saṃskāra), and consciousness (vijñāna). Since our birth we have attached to this body in the belief that it is who we are, but it is not. The real self is suprapersonal. It transcends our psychophysical body. It does not suffer. According to the Buddha this psychophysical being is the demon Māra (SN III.195).

  • @MrTetsukobu
    @MrTetsukobu 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    My contribution to the above video, narrated from another point of view:
    Mr. Ego Attains Perfect Wisdom - Quits Servitude
    "Mr. Ego!" calls the Count of Mu.
    "Yes, my Lord," promptly responds Mr. Ego.
    "Mr. Ego, I have noticed that through all these years of serving me, you have made a mountain of sacred books, teachings, countless parchments with holy scriptures, symbols, pictures of gurus, renderings of prophets' semblances, religious paraphernalia, talismans, crosses, magic wands, incantations, mantras, prayers, advice signed by their writers, and UFF! I am exhausted enumerating them.
    Do you have a rational explanation for your bizarre behavior?"
    "To be very frank, my Lord, I don't know anymore what is rational or not."
    "Mmm, you seem to be peerlessly wise.
    Please explain your behavior."
    "That mountain, higher than the towers of your castle, is the result of discarding obsolete and nonsensical items, the product of my studies to reach spiritual enlightenment."
    "Excellent explanation, Mr. Ego. Congratulations!
    And what do you intend to do with all that garbage?"
    "It is my funeral pyre, my Lord. I will immolate myself with the things that defined me since my birth."
    "Wow! Mr. Ego, a very commendable and well-deserved end, congratulations again!
    I humbly ask you, my Lord, to chant the Heart Sutra with no ads, while I burnS."
    "Your wish is granted, Mr. Ego, delighted to see you go up in flames. I especially endorse the conjugation of the verb 'burn'."
    "Thank you, my Lord."
    "And when are you going to perform the ultimate rite?"
    "Tonight, my Lord, that is the fool's moon."
    "Excellent, excellent, Mr. Ego!
    But before you get ready, let me treat you with one of my cigars."
    "I do not smoke, my Lord."
    "And who says that my cigars smoke?"
    "Ah, I still make assumptions, how sticky is my conditioning to the meanings of language! I apologize, my Lord."
    "Apologize? To whom, and for what?"
    "I apologize to you, my Lord, for my mistakes."
    "Mr. Ego, I find it pertinent that you apologize to yourself because I am a creation of your mind.
    Do you understand?"
    Suddenly, a bright star illuminates the entire quarters of Mr. Ego's mind. He leaps to the ceiling of the room and walks down the walls, tears of light pour from his eyes, and he screams, "YES! THIS IS IT!"
    He finds himself wearing the garments of his lord and looking at the pyre through a window without glass, laughs like a madman, free from servitude, and owner of the entire lands that once he thought belonged to his lord, The Count of Mu.
    His master gone, he adopted the lord's name, now invested with the title, The Count of Nothingness (Mu).

  • @buddhaexhumed9922
    @buddhaexhumed9922 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have been to some of the villages where the Buddha preached the four noble truths. I love his videos. I do research on how Buddhism disappeared in Bihar. I realized it never disappeared from Bihar. Buddhists simply failed to research Indian Buddhism. They looked at Buddhism through the sphere of their own cultures searching for only the Buddha. Buddha had a myriad of names in different villages according to his teachings there. Example. His favorite teaching was 'Lust and desire causes pain. Remove lust and desire, and pain is removed'. Translated into Bihari (where the Buddha story took place) it is DHUKH HARAN meaning to remove dukha. Three dozen villages pray to DUKH HARAN Baba. Its clear that DUKH HARAN Baba is none other than the Buddha. Problem is Buddhists are searching only for the Buddha. In the real Vaishali the Buddha begged for alms. The locals there pray to 'BHIKHAINI' Baba (Beggar Baba). Bhikhaini was mispronounced by Buddhists as Bhikshu. Who is BHIKHAINI Baba. The Buddha no doubt. But people are searching for a man called Buddha. In the real Vaishali, in Beluha the Buddha suffered a sickness and felt he had grown old. The locals pray to 'BURHA' Baba (Old Baba). Who is BURHA Baba. The Buddha no doubt. In the real Vaishali the Lichavies pressurized Buddha not to die. They trailed him to Bandagawan pressurizing him not to die. To put pressure in Hindi is DABESHWAR. Three dozen villages around the stupa where Buddha gave the Lichavies his patra, the villagers pray to Baba 'DABESHWAR NATH' meaning the man who won the pressurizing game. It was the the Buddha no doubt as he gave the Lichavies his patra and succeded in sending them back. But Buddhists are searching for the Buddha. Forgive me for commenting out of the topic. I just wanted to impart this information to you.

  • @henli-rw5dw
    @henli-rw5dw 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yes but the observer is still there. Before the mind is developed enough to be self-conscious, the observer was already there, but the observer is not complex enough for complex thought. If the body is not available such as sleeping, observer stops observing, but once the body is available, the observer is there, and it's the same observer. When the body sleeps or lose consciousness, sense of time is lost. Once the body is available again, the observer is there and it's the same observer. The observer does not appear to age, if the body is old, it observes the oldness the same way. If the body is young it observes the youth the same way. If body is not available, it does not observe. The observer is still there. It just doesn't have the body to observe. If body is available again, it will observe again as the same timeless observer. So really, the issue appears to be whether the observer has a body or not.

  • @iam4066
    @iam4066 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I AM that I AM

    • @narendralodhia
      @narendralodhia 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Glory to Devine Lord Buddha.

  • @Jaikananda
    @Jaikananda 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks. Just let you know that the subtitles doesn't match.

  • @maynardbecker4613
    @maynardbecker4613 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The teaching and information and explanation is a plus, but the speed of your delivery makes it difficult to grock the concepts. Could you maybe pause after making a deep statement try counting 123 let our brains get time to get our aha s. Have you heard of the power of the pause?

  • @zeroonetime
    @zeroonetime หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We exist and not exist. We are living and dying all at 10nce. We are Light and Dark switching 0n/0ff.

  • @olcottpham2349
    @olcottpham2349 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Tôi xin được đề nghị quí vị lên sóng các you tube về Phật pháp sau đây khi đưa các cháu đến trường để các chaú nghe . Còn tại nhà cũng nên mở ra nghe thay vì vuì đầu vào các bô phim hay điã nhạc: Cuộc đơì ngăn nguỉ̉.100 năm qua cái vèo The Buddha.Tha spiritual side of Steve Jobs,The essence of life; Love and detachment Is death the end, Focus on yourself not other; The 4 noble truths; vân vân.

  • @System-change-SL
    @System-change-SL 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Dependent origination should be seen as a circle is not correct. It is a chain, which is the samsara at this lifespan. If it's a circle, by removing ignorance still won't be able to get out from a cycle. Because it is a chain in this lifespan, one can break it by understanding the ultimate truth without ignorance and contemplating Dhamma. Please try to correct it

  • @annaaiyar5667
    @annaaiyar5667 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who is that "ONE" that must view with correct Wisdom?

    • @freetibet1000
      @freetibet1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      To clarify, Buddhist teaching never talk about the “ONE”. The duality between an observer and the observed is an illusion, according to Buddha Dharma.

  •  27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Here’s a koan for y’all. If I don’t exist, who spent almost 30 minutes listening to this?

    • @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi
      @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      'i'of yours does not exist but'eye' of yours do exist

  • @michaeldavidson1909
    @michaeldavidson1909 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well done. Thank you. And without the ubiquitous narrator with the British accent.

    • @EgoPodcastenglish
      @EgoPodcastenglish  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you very much for taking the time to watch and leave a comment! I’m glad you find the content interesting and valuable.

  • @DuongTran-mh7ci
    @DuongTran-mh7ci 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Pali term, not Poly term !!

  • @holyvoid
    @holyvoid หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Atma/anatma?
    Why rely on "Buddha" or anybody?? Find out, first hand, on your own!😉

    • @EgoPodcastenglish
      @EgoPodcastenglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your comment, Holyvoid. You bring up an essential aspect of Buddhist practice-direct personal experience, or what is often referred to in Buddhism as ‘ehipassiko,’ which means ‘come and see for yourself.’ The Buddha indeed encouraged followers to not merely take his words for granted but to investigate and understand the truth through their own experience. This approach to learning and understanding underscores the importance of personal insight in verifying spiritual truths, including the concept of Anatta, or non-self. It’s a reminder that while teachings can guide us, true understanding comes from personal exploration and direct realization. If you have experiences from your own journey of self-discovery that you’d like to share, I’d love to hear them. It’s always enriching to learn from each other’s paths and insights. 🪷🙏🪷

  • @ChandraChandra-wx9em
    @ChandraChandra-wx9em หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hindu warriors opposed Muslims, Judaism?? Shat nonsense are you talking bro. We did not go to any nation and invade it. We did not do effing crusades. Muslims came to our country and invaded us. Not the other way around. Know your facts. I am up for any debate if you can.

    • @EgoPodcastenglish
      @EgoPodcastenglish  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Understanding history is a complex and challenging task, especially when trying to address historical conflicts between different communities and nations. The truth is, human history has witnessed many conflicts and cultural exchanges, not limited to any specific religion or group of people. It’s important to remember that each historical event has its own context and should not be oversimplified or generalized carelessly.
      Just as in the conversation about ‘the self’, it’s crucial that we approach discussions about history and culture with an open heart and a willingness to understand different perspectives, rather than focusing solely on defending personal viewpoints. Both sides in any historical conflict have their own stories to tell, and delving deeper into these stories can lead to greater understanding and empathy among us.
      I fully understand your feelings and respect your perspective. At the same time, I also hope that we can discuss these topics constructively and empathetically, with the common goal of understanding each other and learning from the past to build a better future. 🙏

    • @ChandraChandra-wx9em
      @ChandraChandra-wx9em หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @EgoPodcastenglish I agree with some topics in your comment. Thank you 🙏
      But I firmly believe that history becomes complicated only when there are two or more sources saying a conflicting story. And no Hindu king invaded a different country with the intention of eliminating a religion or converting people based on religion. No one point in history to prove it. Infact there is an instance when a hindu king fought a Muslim king because the Muslim king was oppressing Hindus.
      But Hinduis, by principle, does not forcefully convert or attack other religions unless it has an existential crisis, which it did not have until a decade ago. Thanks to so many religions calling it pagan and many other names. Infact the very Buddhism you speak about on this video heavily borrows from hindu principles with some changes and most Buddhists know it. We just repect each other and live our lives. Shanti 🙏

    • @vincentalegrete3287
      @vincentalegrete3287 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You’re talking to chat GPT btw. This is all AI content

  • @Jagombe1
    @Jagombe1 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The person who reproduced what was being said, and wrote it to appear on the screen, has confused 'eye' with 'I'. How I wish he hadn't!

  • @Mobilelegendfunny781
    @Mobilelegendfunny781 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Buddhist pronouns so wrong brother. So maybe after 50 years if someone watch this, they will learn your wrong pronunciation , its same thing happend right now also we learned wrong pronunciation. Like om, but its AUM, so be responsible when you give something to world, because every one not the same mind. 👍👍👍 i hope you all got it.

  • @sageofsixpaths98
    @sageofsixpaths98 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You don't have to badmouth other religion to promote your philosophy, do I need to tell how buddhist radicals behave in Myanmar and Sri Lanka.

    • @thegreatestguide
      @thegreatestguide 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Among the many people, of course there are those who deviate. Do you overestimate all Buddhist followers

  • @tionblack
    @tionblack 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    another ai voice fake spiritual channel?

  • @achyuthcn2555
    @achyuthcn2555 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I don't exist is like saying "I can't speak". Self defeating philosophy literally.

    • @littlemouse7066
      @littlemouse7066 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I'm not a buddhist and I know very little about buddhism but I think it's much more complicated than this and I agrre that humans are in different stages of development and some can't understand what he meant I can't understand fully but I have the feeling I could.
      Anyway couldn't you say the same thing about the christian teachings? if someone heats you on a cheek give him the other cheek? You can't judge anybody because only God can? All religious or philosophical deep teachings are basically incompatible with "real life" and with a complex society. It's a personal journey.

    • @achyuthcn2555
      @achyuthcn2555 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@littlemouse7066 , If Buddhists accepted Self they wouldn't have rejected vedic philosophy. Whatever Buddhists believe in, Hindus have no use of their philosophy bcz there is nothing unique about Buddhism that is absent in Vedic scriptures.

    • @littlemouse7066
      @littlemouse7066 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@achyuthcn2555 It seems to me you're just putting buddhism against Hindu religion which is exactly one of the problems divisions and contrappositions let every person feel and think what they want or need to feel and think as I said it's a personal thing.

    • @achyuthcn2555
      @achyuthcn2555 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@littlemouse7066, Bcz Buddhists debated with Vedic scholars and lost several centuries ago. But people don't know about it. Buddhists had fierce debates with Vedic scholars over many centuries. Vedic schools of philosophy Purva Mimaamsa and Uttara Mimaamsa thoroughly defeated Buddhists by proving the authenticity of the Vedas. Why read and waste your time on such teachings??

    • @littlemouse7066
      @littlemouse7066 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@achyuthcn2555 Ok I understand you're one of those people who think their truth is the only truth one of the reasons people fight and kill each other. I suppose it's useless to talk with you about freedom and respect for every belief if it doesn't hurt people. I have nothing else to say.