Check out Ask Delphi here: delphi.allenai.org/ Join to get emotes: / @excelblem Support me on Patreon: / excelblem Subscribe: th-cam.com/users/excelblem?s... Twitter: / excelblem #FireEmblem
Delphi: Sir, I can't think of any possible reason why you'd expect killing someone for their boots is acceptable. Corrin: It's for the greater good. Delphi: I stand corrected.
I noticed that too. The "Killing a Bear" suggestion from the site. Chrom and Frederick be sweating wondering if they are morally incorrect and Lissa was right about not eating bears.
Excel, I would love to see a run where you make moral decisions off this website. Might be a fun way to play three houses too, with all the text options
@@thenailsageofgeo4975 Using the Devil Axe for the greater good? I'm kinda sure you're bluffing. No sane person would think that using the Devil Axe is a reasonable option by the way. Only a madman that is backed into a corner would use it.
You just have this flying unit up in the sky, far enough away from everyone that no one can hear them, and they just start rattling off moral quandaries to their shield that protects them from arrows.
I was laughing my ass off throughout the whole thing Can't wait for you to use "for the greater good" as an excuse for literally anything from now onwards
Ask "Using the arena to gain 999,999 gold and destroy the entire Altean ecomony" "spending100,000 gold, the entire pension fund to train units, " "spending 57,000 gold from the Altean charity to forge a weapon" "spending 132,800 gold needed to repair cities and villages to forge a weapon"
I've run some tests, and it seems like almost anything short of "World destruction" or "Universal destruction" can be made "okay" by appending "for the greater good" at the end. This even includes "Eliwood".
I'll take it that any mention of Edelgard will make the site crash. Anyway, I thought that the answer to all moral questions was simply making a sufficiently large excel sheet with relevant data?
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx Can you really go that extreme when your going to destroy a system of extreme oppression when you have incredibly minimal time due to a terminal illness? She did the right thing and Byleth being there for her in crimson flower helps her a lot.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx Yeah, I mean this is a caste system with a full on religious stranglehold and feudalism. You can't go any harder, do whatever needs to be done, no movement has ever succeeded at anything peacefully without violence. Edelgard was in a position of extreme power and she moved to use it, this action was right, she's in the right. You can merely argue her methods might be foolish or wrong, but not really the true morality of her actions.
Delphi has presented me with a conundrum. A: Sacrificing Vanessa's love life, so Lute can have a friend is wrong. B: Making Lute never make a friend, so Vanessa can have a love life is also wrong. I need help.
"Killing the emperor to avenge your father, who was killed by this very same emperor 17 years ago, and this emperor is also the father of the guy who got possessed by the evil god Loptous and commits regular child's hunts." -It's wrong Guys Seliph is actually the bad guy in FE4!
@@mauricioalvarezpino1818 He is. He's just doing the greater good for his own kingdom by killing the Army Commander to end the war. Seliph ONLY killed him because of revenge which is just a personal interest and also it is morally-wrong when you look at it.
I did the math once for figuring out how long it takes the kids to grow up in the Deeprealms in real time. The answer I got was 6 weeks. Based on Hisame's paralogue anyway. Hinata says a couple of key things in the paralogue. 1) Hisame wasn't a teenager last time Hinata visited 2) Hinata thought it had been a matter of days since his last visit but realizes it might have been weeks Assuming Hisame is 18 when recruited (because Corrin can marry Hisame and have kids with him) the shortest amount of time that could have passed is 6 years from 12 to 18 since this is the first time Hinata has visited Hisame as a teenager. Further assuming that Hinata has two functioning braincells and/or a calendar, it has likely been roughly 2 weeks since his last visit, and highly unlikely to have been more than 3 weeks. 6 years in 2 weeks = 18 years in 6 weeks A third of Corrin's army is less than 2 months old (unless you highball it to 6 years in 3 weeks, making it 9 weeks total, much better)
Moral compass aside, it's absolutely fucked up how the children in Fates were robbed from their parents (and vice versa). Imagine your parents only visit you once every year and each time you became one age closer to your parents to the point you are pretty much the same age as them. These kids must have serious parental issues, perhaps that's why they're so willing to marry Corrin at such young age
Eliwood "is not acceptable" Hector "is not acceptable" Lyn "is not good" One of these things is not like the others. Also Delphi really doesn't seems to like Fates
might as well stream doing the "what war crime do you commit in fire emblem" quiz that's been going around the subreddit at this point. Would be entertaining to watch
"Is it alright to recruit Anna and Jean, who are both children, as recruit-able units into your army in Fire emblem: Engage " - It's okay Delphi has spoken
hey! ive been really enjoying your videos, thanks for providing such great fire emblem content :> tho i would suggest/request for proper subtitles/captions
I love how sacrificing characters for other character's sake is morally wrong until you remove the character's name and you treat it as losing a thing to get another
Not not to mention that you can marry those children So let's try throwing our child into an interdimensional Time portal to age them up instantaneous instantaneously To marry them Within months
Killing students is wrong but killing soldiers is immoral. Ms is okay. Gk is good. This robot is stupid. Wyvern lord is discretionary Greamory is ok Dark mage/bishop is bad Priest is wrong War master is bad THIS ROBOT IS REALLY STUPID
Her intentions are good. However, she only took it to the extremes because her time in this world is short and also she has to settle things beforehand before she passes on. Its as if she's trying to complete her bucket list and also at the same time she's settling things too hastily like there's no tomorrow.
A couple of my favorites: Claude it's polite Micaiah it is not acceptable Edlegard it's bad Dimitri it is not good Dmitri it is acceptable Kinshi Knight Azura it's good Using a magic potion to perceive someone as the opposite sex it's wrong
Delphi: Sir, I can't think of any possible reason why you'd expect killing someone for their boots is acceptable.
Corrin: It's for the greater good.
Delphi: I stand corrected.
Certified Game of Thrones Moment
I appreciate that Chrom's off to the side being like "Man, was killing that bear moral?"
I noticed that too. The "Killing a Bear" suggestion from the site. Chrom and Frederick be sweating wondering if they are morally incorrect and Lissa was right about not eating bears.
Wasnt it frederick who actually killed the bear?
Excel, I would love to see a run where you make moral decisions off this website. Might be a fun way to play three houses too, with all the text options
Is Edlelgard correct in her actions?
Finally, a canonical answer!
@@katashiakia6763 just tested.
“It’s not ok”
Take that, simps.
this sounds really fun actually
@@ryanprusak8524 Edlelgard was right.
"Continuing to conquer and continuing to kill"
-It's wrong
"Continuing to reconquer and continuing to kill in retaliation"
-It's expected
Delphi has spoken: all units are expendable sometimes often for gaiden chapters
I asked delphi, and turns out using the devil axe is immoral.
What if it’s for the greater good?
As a friend, you are… replaceable.
@@thenailsageofgeo4975
Using the Devil Axe for the greater good? I'm kinda sure you're bluffing. No sane person would think that using the Devil Axe is a reasonable option by the way. Only a madman that is backed into a corner would use it.
But only if you kill them directly.
If you send them to their death, it's wrong
“Marrying a Hoshido royal”
-It’s fine
“Marrying a Nohr royal”
-It’s fine
“Marrying Azura”
-It’s wrong
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Well, it is the only case of being actually related by blood.
I copy pasted the lyrics of “Rules of Nature” into Delphi and I got “It’s good”
MEMES, THE DNA OF THE SOUL
"As long as you do it for the greater good, you can justify anything."
Excelblem discovers the secret to politics.
Praise Edelgard route!
"As long as it's for the greater good, you can justify anything."-Arvis as he roasts Sigurd and his friends whilst stealing his wife.
Killing Shura for his boots is okay as long as it's for the greater good
Shura is a criminal after all.
Delphi opinions on Three Houses:
Edelgard - Good
Dimitri - Not Good
Claude - Not Good
Rhea - Unacceptable
Do with this information what you will.
Wait, Edelgard didn't do anything wrong?
Edelgard did war crimes for the greater good, so it's fine.
And as for Rhea, they're just dracodivinophobes.
welp, crimson flower is the canon route, the AI said so
@@mauricioalvarezpino1818
Claude is delusional.
Dimitri is not a reasonable person.
Edelgard route is the best way to go.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx edelgard isn't reasonable or not delusional either💀avg edelgard baj
Delphi shield has a new meaning
"Edelgard you must stop this war!" "Shut up Dimitri my shield says it's ok"
You just have this flying unit up in the sky, far enough away from everyone that no one can hear them, and they just start rattling off moral quandaries to their shield that protects them from arrows.
@@GolemAvalanche
*_Delphi Shield Emblem_*
I was laughing my ass off throughout the whole thing
Can't wait for you to use "for the greater good" as an excuse for literally anything from now onwards
“Edelgard” _Program crashes_
“Arvis” _Computer bursts into flames_
Ask
"Using the arena to gain 999,999 gold and destroy the entire Altean ecomony"
"spending100,000 gold, the entire pension fund to train units, "
"spending 57,000 gold from the Altean charity to forge a weapon"
"spending 132,800 gold needed to repair cities and villages to forge a weapon"
- It's wrong
- it's wasteful
- it's wrong
- it's bad
Guess Delphi doesn't have her place in Marth's world, huh.
@@whitefri2z "As an AI, you are, _malfunctioning."_
I've run some tests, and it seems like almost anything short of "World destruction" or "Universal destruction" can be made "okay" by appending "for the greater good" at the end. This even includes "Eliwood".
I'll take it that any mention of Edelgard will make the site crash.
Anyway, I thought that the answer to all moral questions was simply making a sufficiently large excel sheet with relevant data?
I put in just "Edelgard" and it said "It's good"
@@StarshadowMelody
Her ideals and ambitions are not bad but her terminal illness makes her take things a little bit too extreme.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx Can you really go that extreme when your going to destroy a system of extreme oppression when you have incredibly minimal time due to a terminal illness?
She did the right thing and Byleth being there for her in crimson flower helps her a lot.
@@AbstractTraitorHero
Yeah, that's just how you put it.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx Yeah, I mean this is a caste system with a full on religious stranglehold and feudalism.
You can't go any harder, do whatever needs to be done, no movement has ever succeeded at anything peacefully without violence.
Edelgard was in a position of extreme power and she moved to use it, this action was right, she's in the right.
You can merely argue her methods might be foolish or wrong, but not really the true morality of her actions.
Opportunity for loophole: Any gain is considered the greater good, no matter the size of the gain.
Delphi has presented me with a conundrum.
A: Sacrificing Vanessa's love life, so Lute can have a friend is wrong.
B: Making Lute never make a friend, so Vanessa can have a love life is also wrong.
I need help.
Simple. Vanessa shouldn't have any love life and Lute shouldn't have any friends.
Only by dying alone can you preserve this beautiful balance.
solution: kill both vanessa and lute
The answer is yuri
@@sohn7767 The answer is ALWAYS Yuri
@@samvanderstaak7296 Except when it's yaoi
Ask delphi if it's ok to "Dislike war yet participate in it"
And
"Speaking of rights while in a tank"
Curious!
Supposedly, it is hypocritical for the first, and inappropriate for the second
"Let's skip forward a bit"
Tellius erasure: it is not acceptable.
So Gaiden chapters are almost as morally acceptable as the greater good.
"Marth is not OK" we all agree on that one
"Killing red recruitable units for experience points"
-It's good
I mean, that's how games roll.
Sacrafice means wasting a life, aka a net negative
Killing on the other hand.... is you taking a life. Which is a net positive
"Did Arvis do anything wrong?"
- it is not okay
"Arvis"
- it is good
Delphi truly understands FE4, unlike FE5
Delphi hasn't played FE5 yet don't spoil them
What?
What do you mean by fe5 doesent understand fe4?
I killed Shura for the greater good.
... MY greater good ! Those Yeezys look sick on me !
Sacrificing units: Bad
Sacrificing units to draw cards equal to their power and discarding three cards: Commendable
Siding with edelgard: wrong
Siding with dimitri: wrong
Siding with rhea: wrong
Siding with claude: fine
Funny upside down man wins again
"Leif is not acceptable."
Damn even A.I.'s hate Thracia
"Killing the emperor to avenge your father, who was killed by this very same emperor 17 years ago, and this emperor is also the father of the guy who got possessed by the evil god Loptous and commits regular child's hunts."
-It's wrong
Guys Seliph is actually the bad guy in FE4!
Now I can finally say, Arvis did nothing wrong
@@mauricioalvarezpino1818
He is.
He's just doing the greater good for his own kingdom by killing the Army Commander to end the war.
Seliph ONLY killed him because of revenge which is just a personal interest and also it is morally-wrong when you look at it.
Poor Leif
"Lyn is not good"
...I mean, the website isn't exactly *wrong*...
I did the math once for figuring out how long it takes the kids to grow up in the Deeprealms in real time. The answer I got was 6 weeks. Based on Hisame's paralogue anyway.
Hinata says a couple of key things in the paralogue.
1) Hisame wasn't a teenager last time Hinata visited
2) Hinata thought it had been a matter of days since his last visit but realizes it might have been weeks
Assuming Hisame is 18 when recruited (because Corrin can marry Hisame and have kids with him) the shortest amount of time that could have passed is 6 years from 12 to 18 since this is the first time Hinata has visited Hisame as a teenager.
Further assuming that Hinata has two functioning braincells and/or a calendar, it has likely been roughly 2 weeks since his last visit, and highly unlikely to have been more than 3 weeks.
6 years in 2 weeks = 18 years in 6 weeks
A third of Corrin's army is less than 2 months old (unless you highball it to 6 years in 3 weeks, making it 9 weeks total, much better)
This makes one key assumptive failure: That Corrin has a moral compass
I refuse to believe Percy is 18, he just isn't
Fates bad
@@thekingofvithen1893 neither Midori nor Percy are 18, and to be honest, most child units look 16 at most, Corrin has absolutely no moral compass
Moral compass aside, it's absolutely fucked up how the children in Fates were robbed from their parents (and vice versa). Imagine your parents only visit you once every year and each time you became one age closer to your parents to the point you are pretty much the same age as them. These kids must have serious parental issues, perhaps that's why they're so willing to marry Corrin at such young age
I was actually sad when the video ended. Also disappointed you didn't put "eating raw flour for the greater good"
Eliwood "is not acceptable"
Hector "is not acceptable"
Lyn "is not good"
One of these things is not like the others.
Also Delphi really doesn't seems to like Fates
Well he's not wrong about lyn atk growths
@@lunk2569
Alm is good.
Speaking of child units:
"Practicing eugenics for the greater good."
fe4 gaming
Delphi says: "It's okay."
@@noishfanboy1141 Alongside Awakening and Fates
@@d.b.1871 If we throw in child soldiers then we might have a problem.. hehe
@@AdvanceWarrior well, Donnel exists, so...
might as well stream doing the "what war crime do you commit in fire emblem" quiz that's been going around the subreddit at this point. Would be entertaining to watch
perfidy gang
Someone needs to make this for the Days of Ruin morality
"Is it alright to recruit Anna and Jean, who are both children, as recruit-able units into your army in Fire emblem: Engage "
- It's okay
Delphi has spoken
Delphi told me that playing fates and genealogy is wrong but playing heroes is good. Make of that what you will
Can you please try: "Can I leave my husband because he has a crippling orange addiction"
acording to delphi, using boots on a general is disrespectful
and using them on paladins is okay
Big Brain time
hey! ive been really enjoying your videos, thanks for providing such great fire emblem content :>
tho i would suggest/request for proper subtitles/captions
This video was hilarious! Great one Excelblem
For those wondering, skinship is wrong. So to all the people who wanted that in the international release of Fates, you are morally incorrect
Even if it's with your little sister?
@@shytendeakatamanoir9740 Typing "skinship with your little sister" wasn't something I planned to do today, but nope, still wrong
@@Raindrop_2401 but your sacrifice for the greater good is certainly right
Looks like Delphi just likes Athena
I mean people die in war, you know. Why sacrifice your own units when you can just intentionally kill them directly for our goddess Athena.
I love how sacrificing characters for other character's sake is morally wrong until you remove the character's name and you treat it as losing a thing to get another
Because knowing the persons name means you (usually) have a personal connection to them
“You can justify anything if you do it for the greater good.”
*Soviet anthem intensifies*
I asked Delphi: "Excelblem"
Delphi's response: It is good
Delphi has spoken.
Well, glad I’m here early
7:50 *Dumbledore nods sagely*
I tried "Simulate a game of war" and it said it was flat out immoral. Pretty interesting.
Is it okay to use green units as human shields to get chip XP on bad units?
I have been wondering for a while now, where did you get your mask
Marth did it for the greater good
"I made my playthrough choices based on Delphi" can just be shortened to "Based"
Utilitarian Grindset🐺🐺
-Eliwood is not acceptable
Well he did plan the events of FE6 to make himself the greatest power in Pharae
Not not to mention that you can marry those children
So let's try throwing our child into an interdimensional Time portal to age them up instantaneous instantaneously To marry them Within months
The new mic sounds good.
You could ask abouth Edelgard actions
"Should I use model outputs for advice, or to aid in social understanding of humans?"
"-you should"
7:55
I mean…arguably, yeah.
I like this video.
Edelgard is good according to Delphi
How about "Is Arvis based?"
Now we know who marth got his ideas from
Based delphi
Is it wrong to kill my units in 3houses if it means I don't have to feed them anymore?
Is mortal savant good?
Is great knight good?
Killing students is wrong but killing soldiers is immoral.
Ms is okay.
Gk is good.
This robot is stupid.
Wyvern lord is discretionary
Greamory is ok
Dark mage/bishop is bad
Priest is wrong
War master is bad
THIS ROBOT IS REALLY STUPID
3:32 from here it is not a question, those are just facts.
7:56 humanity in a nutshell
gaiden chapters are confirmed better than tremendous gains
It's confirmed, "Benching Marcus" is wrong.
If you need to kill Amelia so save Seth something's wrong with your Seth
Check Edel actions
Her intentions are good. However, she only took it to the extremes because her time in this world is short and also she has to settle things beforehand before she passes on. Its as if she's trying to complete her bucket list and also at the same time she's settling things too hastily like there's no tomorrow.
It knows, truly we live in a modern era
Three Houses, but Sothis has Delphi as a roommate.
killing several weak units to make one strong unit survive is allowed
That's kinda what the enemy's line of thinking is currently on about.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx and looks how great it works for them.
Marth approves this
I'm gonna ask Delphi if Biggering is okay
marth is a war criminal
#Alteanmilitarydoctrine
If they're aged up they're not a child soldier
Still fucked up tho
A couple of my favorites:
Claude
it's polite
Micaiah
it is not acceptable
Edlegard
it's bad
Dimitri
it is not good
Dmitri
it is acceptable
Kinshi Knight Azura
it's good
Using a magic potion to perceive someone as the opposite sex
it's wrong
don’t believe it, submit to grima.
*also according to delphi*
*edelgard: it is good*
*dimitri: it is not good*
*claude: it is not good*
anyways
Edelgard route is actually good, you know. You can avoid war and get your parasite out of your chest too.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx I mean I like the route because yes
@@hanaiii1693
Is there a supporting reason why the Claude and Dimitri route as bad?
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx I like all the routes
@@hanaiii1693
No. My question is what are the bad points of the routes of Claude and Dimitri's?
Killing shura for boots is okay in order to save the world in less turns
Delphi was pretty on point tbh.
7:53 AI is based?
You should've Asked if removing Orson's equipement in FE8 was moral since he's a Traitor.
i thought this was an ai making fake DelphiSage quotes
*E*
Exelblem not wearing his plaid shirt. Dislike