115: False Advertising

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 37

  • @youtubewatcher2
    @youtubewatcher2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    A cheering sanity amongst the endless evasive party voices of the current politics. Thanks so much for your podcasts in this increasingly dreary campaign.

  • @chrisclee6693
    @chrisclee6693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I've only recently stumbled upon these.
    Algorithm finally did something good!
    Thank you for such tremendous work. These make my bike rides to and from work fly by!

  • @mj-gb6tr
    @mj-gb6tr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Will someone please point out that CCHQ renamed themselves 'Tax Check UK' right before last night's debate?

  • @The_Dude_Rugs
    @The_Dude_Rugs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I live in Bristol and the amount of labour ads for Thangam on TH-cam around the first 2 weeks of the election being called were astonishing, it was all I was getting

  • @ohyeah2816
    @ohyeah2816 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    All that money and I haven't changed my mind, what a waste. Vote Labour 👍🏼✌🏼❤️😀

  • @TheWebstaff
    @TheWebstaff 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I keep getting a Labour advert on YT, that if I didn't go check who it was for I'd have no idea if was for them.

    • @jeanlafayette7152
      @jeanlafayette7152 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YT keeps showing me a Labour advert for the candidate who's standing in a constituency I don't live in.

  • @richardh8082
    @richardh8082 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I had a nightmare last night that I had to vote Tory in order to stop a Refuk candidate winning the seat 😱

  • @ProffyChaos
    @ProffyChaos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great podcast.

  • @DC-wt2vi
    @DC-wt2vi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could you look into the amounts parties can spend on advertising when it depends on the number of candidates fielded, please? A disproportionately loud party fielded numerous paper candidates, who made little or no attempt to engage with the electorate in the constituencies that they were placed in. Likely that same party overspent on advertising in specific constituencies. Would be of public interest to learn what was going on and where money was ending up. Our democracy relies on trust and honesty, but after this one everything about candidates (I had to bring ID to the polling station in order to vote, but candidates had no obligation to provide the electorate with any proofs of their existence) to campaigns containing provable lies wants tightened and made more accountable.

    • @alicequayle4625
      @alicequayle4625 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really good points. Maybe email the Electoral Commission?

  • @wowyaywowyaywow
    @wowyaywowyaywow 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good point-- American journalists shouldn't stand up when the President walks in. It's strange.

  • @RobertJonesWightpaint
    @RobertJonesWightpaint 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A conversation in which people are listening to each other, not talking over each other: you should give lessons to the News Agents.

    • @Andrew-rc3vh
      @Andrew-rc3vh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You get the other extreme on YT quite often. I confess I often listen to presenters at double speed.

  • @thepleasuregarden4086
    @thepleasuregarden4086 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Big shout out for the Yorkshire Party leaflet!

  • @davidstone-haigh4880
    @davidstone-haigh4880 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Clarity vs Obfuscation. The PI Way.

  • @W_Bin
    @W_Bin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's complicated about the difference between "will" and "could be"??? Or requiring sources quoted?

  • @brianwallace6566
    @brianwallace6566 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    LOVE the hack's reaction when he hears Helen Lewis say that US journos stand up when the president enters the room: "WHAAAAT???"

    • @SuezWSuezW
      @SuezWSuezW 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah. He's the fuckin' head of State, have some respect!

    • @Rachel_M_
      @Rachel_M_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@SuezWSuezW the Monarch is the head of state here, not the prime minister.

    • @col.hertford9855
      @col.hertford9855 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@SuezWSuezWwhy?

    • @Hartley_Hare
      @Hartley_Hare 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SuezWSuezWFor what?

    • @SittaCarolinensis
      @SittaCarolinensis 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was taught that it was good manners to stand up when someone enters the room, particularly in a formal setting, whoever they are!

  • @tommymorrison6478
    @tommymorrison6478 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this genuine? I thought Hislop was against going on the web?

  • @stevereber3358
    @stevereber3358 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You were worried about "no one will pick up the phone". Rupert Murdock and Piers Morgan can fix that. And Besos can figure out that if we do away with income taxes and do 8500% tariffs on Chinese imports (Trump idea with no math or logic) besos can "earn" all the money he has been "deferring" for 10 years. Look for Besos's new book "What color is your light saber?"

  • @kidmohair8151
    @kidmohair8151 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    how delightful to run across this again, having had to suffer through
    the regressive drivel that the tube'y'all has inflicted on me since it decided
    (for some reason known only to the algo-deities) that I didn't r.e.a.l.l.y. want to watch/listen to
    what I had been watching/listening to for the last decade.

  • @IntrigueJunkie
    @IntrigueJunkie 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a longtime user of ad blocking software....

  • @ricesnot
    @ricesnot 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    People who don't adblock deserve it

  • @baloodarling486
    @baloodarling486 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is excellent content by Private Eye; I don't have to look at Ian Hislop's smug face. Keep it up! X

  • @JoannaHammond
    @JoannaHammond 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haven't seen a single political advert, but then again I haven't seen a single advert, use an adblocker, be sensible.

  • @adrianaspalinky1986
    @adrianaspalinky1986 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why are you being spammed on my feed