This should clearly present the case against Cosmopolitanism: Nagel, Thomas. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33, no. 2 (2005): 113-147. Margalit, Avishai, and Joseph Raz. “National Self-Determination.” The Journal of Philosophy 87, no. 9 (1990): 439-461. Philpott, Daniel. “In Defense of Self-Determination.” Ethics 105, no. 2 (1995): 352-385 Stilz, Anna. “Why Do States Have Territorial Rights?.” International Theory 1, no. 2 (2009): 185-213. Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983. ---. “The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, no. 3 (1980): 209-229.
This should clearly present the case against Cosmopolitanism:
Nagel, Thomas. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33, no. 2 (2005): 113-147.
Margalit, Avishai, and Joseph Raz. “National Self-Determination.” The Journal of Philosophy 87, no. 9 (1990): 439-461.
Philpott, Daniel. “In Defense of Self-Determination.” Ethics 105, no. 2 (1995): 352-385
Stilz, Anna. “Why Do States Have Territorial Rights?.” International Theory 1, no. 2 (2009): 185-213.
Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
---. “The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, no. 3 (1980): 209-229.
ok thanks
Very complete explanation. Thank you for making this. Great job!
Can you include references?
I want the video on Multiculturalism ...please
Sure, we will do it soon, mate
Conclusion:
Cosmopolitanism ruined France.
You don’t need some goofy ah hand to show notes 🗣️🙏
Ok