No kidding, after watching this I asked my neighbor who’s 55 cause he was helping me around my yard and he said he could’ve sworn Mandela died in the 70’s. I was a little tripped out...but he couldn’t believe it when I told him it was 2013
@77ranko Or maybe you're paranoid. If a system is so advanced that it can simulate the universe and deliberately fool people that they're not in a simulation, that something like a fucking book named 'Berenstein' bears would throw it all off? That's so silly it's completely ridiculous to anybody who isn't a total layman
@@joexer1 I mean instances like these are a lot, yet they all seem to be minor or inconsecuential enough so people don't really get it or are tricked into thinking it was like that. Like when in a movie something is placed somewhere or someone is wearing something or has a particular hairstyle but after cuts and reshoots something changes, and yet many of us don't notice when watching unless we actually rewatch the movie and even then we might not notice until it is pointed out to us.
I thought so as well.Until the spelling of a tv legal anaysts surname--(who's show I have been watching for 10 years,and specifically, who's surname spelling&pronounciation i had been admiring for a decade)-- changed by one letter!And,according to a Google search,where I even found an image of a15 yr old autographed publicity photo; had always been spelled as it is spelled currently.
Wrote this in another comment - 'A glitch in the simulation is very unlikely a historical misconception (a differing letter in the name of the story) - it's way more likely to be a bug in a brain. Brains are the most complex things we have ever known and are most likely the things most prone to bugs. I'm not saying the simulation hypothesis is not real, but I'm saying this isn't very good evidence to support it.'
if we turn out to be in a simulation and we some day create our own simulation, then whoever simulated us is going to start having existential questions about their own reality.
@@bradenbigham2007 yes but we could find outselves in simulationception where everyone is a simulation within a simulation within a simulation, and there was no beginning, it's an infinite regress.
Wrote this in another comment - 'A glitch in the simulation is very unlikely a historical misconception (a differing letter in the name of the story) - it's way more likely to be a bug in a brain. Brains are the most complex things we have ever known and are most likely the things most prone to bugs. I'm not saying the simulation hypothesis is not real, but I'm saying this isn't very good evidence to support it.'
@@nogussy The brain is a fractal of the simulation and if it is subject to bugs/flaws/glitches then by extrapolation the simulated reality will have too. Just my two penneth .
Ever heard of the many worlds theory? I'd start there to open your mind and not limit yourself. The fact that we exist as conscious beings floating around in infinite space shows anything is possible.
Things like 'Young's double slit experiment' are what convince me that reality may be a simulation, the fact that particles change from a wave to a discernible particle only when observed seems suspiciously similar to how video games only render what the player sees. Basically why waste computing power on individual particles when nobody is looking, just simulate them as a simple wave of probability until somebody looks at them.
@@lostbutfreesoul I wouldn't think that its because they lack computing resources, its just why bother wasting energy on simulating the entire universe with infinite detail, if you can get away with just simulating the main stuff, then you might as well save on your power bill. Also I don't believe that the people running the simulation are unimaginable creatures, I think they're just humans simulating the universe because they want to see how they themselves evolved in a simulated universe with the same starting conditions that they had.
Then you've misunderstood the results of the double slit experiment. A wave of light doesn't magically know when a human is looking at it closely and suddenly become a particle, rather it is always both a wave and a particle at the same time. Or, more accurately, every particle is not a fixed point in space but a normal distribution 'wave' of probability of where it could be. A wave does NOT resolve into a particle when observed. Look up Heisenburgs uncertainty principle. This is true for all matter in the universe. Plus, observation isn't passive; looking at something interferes with it. This is especially true for looking at very small things. For example when you look through a microscope you have to blast the subject with energy (visible light). To see something smaller you need something with a shorter wavelength- an electron- which is what electron microscopes are for. Now if you want to see something even smaller than that you use gamma rays, which completely destroy whatever you're trying to observe, which brings me back to my original point that looking at something is actively and physically interacting with it, which can change the outcome of whatever you're trying to measure. (Granted, this doesn't apply to the double slit experiment, but still worth noting when talking about collapsing wave functions and stuff.)
@@kesa5593 I think that Bell's theorem / quantum venn diagram paradox is a much better evidence than the double slit experiment for the "culling" (it's what's called the mechanism that discards the parts of the world not being rendered in video games) hypothesis.
@@lostbutfreesoul Within a universe there are physical limitations on the computer components so even if you absorb power from stars or through the exploitation of physical phenomena, you are still limited as to how much you can generate. The amount of detail to simulate a single organism such as a mockingbird is beyond what all of our computers in this world can do and the components for the computers are reaching the minimal scale at the moment. If a universe has constant laws of physics, then even if it's different in nature, it does not have unlimited processing power. Even a multiplanetary civilization would have to optimize on the size of their supercomputers. If they are the original civilization, i.e. biological beings, quantum effects may not apply, preventing them from taking advantage of quantum computers.
All of you just want to jump on the "being different" ban wagon. The simulation theory contradicts itself at least several times. All human constructs made by...humans who don't have a grip on reality. I wish people would see how ridiculous they sound. I have ACTUAL experience in life. It can't be a simulation because so many things would cancel each other out. Anyone who believes this lives in fantasy land.
More than likely are, if they exist, they're gods to us. We don't really keep it a secret that we are aware, and even if, its not unlikely that they know
I smoked a high dose of DMT 4 months ago for the first time, it was the most incredible experience of my life. I now believe deep down to my core that this reality isn't everything, that there are "realities" that exist outside of ours, that when we die we wake up in a different place where our true forms reside.
Only until they experience that realm. Also i feel our brian renders stuff out to run better. I feel psychedelics turn off fire walls to allow us to experience and see even hear what’s actually being shown.
The Mandela Effect is the pinnacle of hubris. “I am so certain that human memory is so flawless that the universe must have inexplicably teleported me to another universe.”
My teacher just mentioned something along these lines today, when we were learning about the random function in Python. “This function is an algorithm, therefore it’s written by a human. It’s not really random, but it sure is complex. So, is your “conscience” really thinking that your actions are random or has it been affected by something around you.” I left his room speechless.
I am 32 and when i heard about mandela dying recently I was surprised. I remembered sitting in the floor in front of the TV and hearing the news when i was a kid sometime in the early 90s. Then other people started to experience the same thing and i was shocked. Hopefully is a faulty memory and not a glitch in the matrix machine. Also what in the world a scientist mean by "computer code in the universe", like really?? He should provide much more detail otherwise this "scientist " he is working against his own reputation.
The place where this falls apart is that we have to assume that the simulation not only simulates a reality, but that it simulates billions of consciousness. You know that you are conscious, so therefore you must live in a reality where that is possible. IT seems unlikely that a computer would be able to create a consciousness, let alone billions of them.
Yannick Karges just because your AI is supper complex doesn’t mean it’s self aware. Example whales have brains bigger than ours, but are they self aware? No, so there are some other factors to consciousnesses other than complexity. Maybe a soul, perhaps our neurons are special somehow, or most likely something we haven’t considered.
Jinx Dragon Well no it’s not an assumption, there’s basic characteristics that consciousness entails. Everything else you said I agree that is a possibility of our universe, and I’m just a simulated stimulus. Though there are many other theories about you’re existence, and believing in anything would play your hand against the universe. The odds would be your one belief vs infinite others, so I try not to believe in just a one thing.
No. People's alike mind the main problem, because they're not creating their own information. That means someone generating information for them before they first thought of an idea. All the people are doing is following up an idea without showing no perceptual awareness.
"Man I need to buy a new sim, all mine does is sit around smoke weed all day, and watch videos on the internet. I'm going to ask my mom as soon as she gets home for the 5.99" that's probably what's going on in the background of my simulation!! 😁😁
Anyone trying to prove we are living in a simulation will be faced with a very tricky problem. Assuming that you are, you cannot rely on working with other people to verify the simulation hypothesis (they may all just be part of the simulation and try to trick you into believing this world is not a simulation). This rules out verification by consensus and the scientific method. All you are left with is observation and introspection. Unfortunately, you cannot fully trust your own observations because you can never completely rule out things like hallucinations and mental illness. So no matter what you do you will not be able to definitively answer that question. I personally think there is a very decent chance that we are but I’m not that bothered by it.
To me the mandela effect prove that we live in two different simulation machines, but we still can interact with eachother, one for sucessfull people, one for unsucessfull people. One build you up if you manage to work and be sucessfull, one tear you down if you arent able to work and be sucessfull. Heaven or hell -.-
People need to stop citing the Mandela Effect as an argument for the Simulation Theory or the Simulation Theory will be forgotten. I find it likely we are in a simulation but the Mandela Effect is bad memory and the brain finding patterns. It's been debunked example after example, the Mandela reporting included. Apart from mathematical complexity: time dilation in great concentrations of matter, the collapse of the wave function meaning that if we're not looking there may only exist waves of potentiality, the fact that you can generate a universe with a computer smaller than the universe, the fact that we know of energy sources in space that could give unprecedented amounts of power etc.
You know how to know we aren’t in a simulation? Simple, we are self aware! Just cause you can create an advanced sim doesn’t mean you can create self aware beings within the sim. I think therefore I am therefore I am not simulated.
I know this may sound bizarre but I was watching a tv-show called "The 100" and in season 3 it shows how and a young woman named Becca Franco (scientist she was from the future 97 years earlier ) found a pathway to access a human mind so she and the assistant Chris started working on an A. I known as A.L.I.E and so Becca franco had to lock up A.L.I.E because her answer for what was wrong with the world was "too many people" and as you can see with today's problems Trump and Biden/ Scientists are creating all these diseases because the world's population keeps on increasing. You might think this sounds stupid but it does not trust me, and if you don't believe me take a good look at the movie called "2012 " supposedly someone from the future "went back in time" and stopped the world from ending cause the world was supposed to end in 2012 but it was postponed someone stopped it. And referring back to the tv-show "The 100" when Lexa died in season 3 episode 7 I think her servant (I forgot his name) took a chip out of the back of her neck. So you see we may be dead already just living in the "City Of Light" reliving this world over and over again, and that's why some people say that earth is hell because we keep on getting sent back here just like in "The 100" tv-show.
It’s so irritating when you have to listen to ads not only leading up to the video and the ending of the video but within the video as well. It just ruins it.
Or maybe we live inside of a simulation, inside of a simulation, inside of a dream, inside of a simulation, inside of a nightmare, inside of a dream. Dun dun duh.
So this is my first video on your channel. That matters.. 5:30 "In a way, that's comforting, because nothing matters.. On the other hand..." And that's where the stream froze/buffered . I legit sat here for 10 seconds thinking "Wow, this guy is good." then the stream caught up, and I was in the middle of a curiosity stream commercial. And I'm like "Man, this guy is really GOOD!". Then I rewound the video, and discovered that this was nothing more than a perfectly timed anomoly in my own personal matrix. Damn, that was funny.
*"it is vastly more likely that we are living in one such simulation, in a way, that's kind of comforting, in the sense that nothing really matters."* What? So, if the universe is an accident, nothing matters, make peace with that. But if we are currently in a simulation (being maintained and managed by outsiders, possibly similar to ourselves), nothing matters?? How are those even remotely similar? We could join together to try and communicate/make signs showing we are self-aware and don't wish to die/be deleted. Plead our case for our code to not be recycled or what not. Or, at the very least for them not turn off the simulation (in a OT Noah's Flood-style reboot). I'm just not seeing how, if we are in a simulation, nothing matters. (After all, We were put here. There are mindful forces outside our box that decide our fate.) Do people simply want to be blissful in believing nothing matters regardless of correlating warnings of religions and notions of philosophy try to say? ..Did I just answer my own question?..
Wait I got it we can check if we are in a simulation its so simple if we create like thousands of simulation games then somewhere our world's power and quality decreases if we are in a simulation
I dunno, can computers simulate infinite "space"? I would guess not? Even if a computer had 100 to the power of 100 Terrabytes of rom, any environment created would be finite, wouldn't it? Same could be said with any given number. If we find that our "universe" has a border, like you would find in a video game, would that prove we are in a simulation? I don't know. It was just a thought.
even if we are in a simulation, why does that matter? Everything looks real, same as we wouldnt be in a simulation. If they are both the same, then why does it matter? It wont ever affect us
You should have mentioned the "Double Slit experiment". Why render the exact path, way down at the photon level, unless something is currently monitoring that path. Oh, and stop using The Matrix as your example, use "The Thirteenth Floor" instead. That simulation in "The Thirteenth Floor" was full of Non Player Characters, which is what we are. We aren't like Agent Smith, who knows he is a "program", and we aren't humans floating in a pod, plugged into "the Matrix". One last point, our simulation is running at super high speed compared to the "real" outside world. Imagine you are a nineth grader in the year 3021 studying ancient history, and you pick the assignment "What if Donald Trump had won the 2016 election". You'd tell your computer to start off with a simulation running from the year 1501 and stopping at the year 2081. You'd tell the computer to run the simulation at high speed so that one year in the simulation would complete in one minute in the outside world of the nineth grader. The simulation would finish running in less than 10 hours and you could see the results. Also, you could ask your computer, "What was the highest grossing movie that the 'people' in the simulation came up with", and then you could watch that movie.
I have a theory: the radio vibrance of nothingness pressurized to make nothing into a white space of quarks and imploded the seconds of its existence to create the first atoms. The backrooms are ways to escape the liminal space of our reality and you have to escape them if you want to get back to reality. Dreams just create a stimuli that teleport you to liminal dimensions where you have barely any consciousness and its built specifically based on your thoughts and emotions.
Do you think that we are microbes and live in SOMEONE'S BODY There migh be paralel Earths ...if you time-space you go in a paralel wolrd ...its complicated
Imagining what super advanced civilizations want is just random guessing based from our civilization. An interesting thought presented in a kurzgezagt video is "Imagine the smartest ant ever seeing an amusement park - it's curious about what humans are up to, so you try to explain. Unfortunately, the ant just doesn't understand. The concept of rollercoasters and standing in lines and holidays and fun doesn't make sense to an ant living an ant life. It's the same with us and a post human being. Compared to them, we are ants. Running a simulation for fun or science, might be an absurdly stupid idea for them."
Why was any video game created? Think about just being a character in a game, if you've ever played The Sims it's a perfect example, just imagine that we are inside an advanced version of that. Made simply for random amusement.
Why is that so strange to include? I've heard that mentioned many times with simulation theory. It's like you can't imagine a program having its historical data rewritten.
I have three problems with the simulation theory: 1. Its stupid 2. There is no reason to make a simulation 3. Even if we did live in one, it wouldn't change anything
I think the simulation is perception itself. It’s a dream within a dream within a dream. Think of those mirrors across one another that never end. Just my opinion based on experience.
_If_ the universe is a simulation at the subatomic level, then I wonder if the entities running the simulation would even be able to detect any life in it, even sapient life. Perhaps some alien professor will noticed yet another planet with unusual chemical activity and have its grad student do their thesis on it. However, if it's based on humans and/or all animals and just concentrates on our impressions & internal models... that actually seems even more complicated (but probably uses a lot less RAM). In that case, 2020 must be the year the cat walked across the keyboard. In general though, it's presumptuous to assume that if *we* _may_ be able to do it someday then some unknown, unprovable intelligence has already done so _and_ we're the result. That grad student probably wouldn't get the results published. BTW, I have to wonder if there was a lot of 1980s file footage shown when Nelson Mandela passed away, which _may_ have done something... Though it's likely lots of people already assumed he had passed away within a few years of Apartheid ending. As for the bears, that kind of misreading/assuming thing is extremely common.
The Mandela Effect can be explained as your brain saving energy by using shortcuts. Also, corrupted memories could explain them. In the case with the Berenstain Bears, it sounds more normal if it is the Berenstein Bears, so that's how we remembered it. Also, if we are living in a simulation, it would probably use a lot of energy. Also, I don't understand who would make these simulations and what is the reason for their existence.
This is an easy question to answer we're not in a simulation because no one who's ever died has respawned at there bed... unless, OH NO! We're playing in Hardcore mode!
I'd like to see your source for that, because it's kind of a leap to go from "you can't deny the Holocaust happened" to "you can't question the nature of reality".
Not in a simulation God put us on this Earth He is the creator It’s because of him we live it’s because of him we have peace joy happiness It’s because of him we John:316 He sent his son to die for us because we were doomed to hell People have to Realize That we live on a perfect earth We’re at 70° in the summer And 30° in the winter And every other planet is not livable That didn’t happen because of the rock that hit to hurt
Our parent universe made our simulation to be a replica of their species and history so they could understand their past and events that didn't get recorded
Simulation = Creation If we are a simulation/creation then it follows that the simulator/creator has a purpose. I am persuaded that the purpose is more meaningful than entertainment or research.
player(mind)....computer(brain)...avatar(body).....eat bacon and cheese lose life points...eat salad and water and fish gain life points....excercise get faster(turbo)...collect gold coins....try not to get rid of gold coins.....Its called Life, NOT HARD TO FIGURE OUT
Hey Second Thought, why is this video so quiet? Right click on the video and select 'Stats for nerds'. From there, you'll see that TH-cam measures the audio as 10 dB too quiet. You need to boost your levels on future videos.
I think we are just 'testing sims', and we are being controlled by someone from a very advanced civilisation, and the one(who is controlling us) is practising how to play this game or use the sims, so that they can use another sims in their military
*I could have sworn I've heard all these points before in other videos, call it de ja vu or a glitch in the matrix, but I know the Mandela effect was never about being in a simulation.*
I remember when i was young and in 4th class, our teacher was showing us answers of a chapter involving an elephant who saved his master, she(the teacher) even threw a boy's copy when he was writting in rough copy, and then when i went absent for 2 or 3 days and came back to school, that teacher was showing us answers of the same chapter!!! I still remember when i asked her "man we did this a while ago", she said that when did we did it?? I mean wtf i remember that she was showing us answers and i had one more incident, which is a bit similar to this happened to me when i was very young(i think 8 yrs old)
"Mandela Effect" is a pretty good excuse for your poor memory
No kidding, after watching this I asked my neighbor who’s 55 cause he was helping me around my yard and he said he could’ve sworn Mandela died in the 70’s. I was a little tripped out...but he couldn’t believe it when I told him it was 2013
Mandela effect is bullshit
@77ranko Or maybe you're paranoid. If a system is so advanced that it can simulate the universe and deliberately fool people that they're not in a simulation, that something like a fucking book named 'Berenstein' bears would throw it all off? That's so silly it's completely ridiculous to anybody who isn't a total layman
@@joexer1 I mean instances like these are a lot, yet they all seem to be minor or inconsecuential enough so people don't really get it or are tricked into thinking it was like that. Like when in a movie something is placed somewhere or someone is wearing something or has a particular hairstyle but after cuts and reshoots something changes, and yet many of us don't notice when watching unless we actually rewatch the movie and even then we might not notice until it is pointed out to us.
I thought so as well.Until the spelling of a tv legal anaysts surname--(who's show I have been watching for 10 years,and specifically, who's surname spelling&pronounciation i had been admiring for a decade)-- changed by one letter!And,according to a Google search,where I even found an image of a15 yr old autographed publicity photo; had always been spelled as it is spelled currently.
_"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."_
*~ Albert Einstein*
Sir Friendship but einsyeins died
_"People just tag my name to whatever shitty quote they can find"_
-Albert Einstein
Albear Berenstein*
@@martiddy *Bearstien
Sir Friendship ok
It’s laughable that the Mandela effect was mentioned here.
Wrote this in another comment -
'A glitch in the simulation is very unlikely a historical misconception (a differing letter in the name of the story) - it's way more likely to be a bug in a brain. Brains are the most complex things we have ever known and are most likely the things most prone to bugs. I'm not saying the simulation hypothesis is not real, but I'm saying this isn't very good evidence to support it.'
It's laughable people still deny it cause they're scared.
@@goldsurfer48 *they're *rational
@Wesley Wulff oh what a big f#@king deal there their they're who the shit cares you understand the sentence and context don't you jackasses.
Gold Surfer jackassieisis*
if we turn out to be in a simulation and we some day create our own simulation, then whoever simulated us is going to start having existential questions about their own reality.
Yes make our creators suffer
if I made a world simulation and found out that my creation figured out that he/she was in a simulation, I would let it play out.
@@bradenbigham2007 yes but we could find outselves in simulationception where everyone is a simulation within a simulation within a simulation, and there was no beginning, it's an infinite regress.
Top tier comedy
I thought it was easy: Ctrl+Alt+Delete, then see what happens!
Instructions unclear. Accidentally deleted the Universe
Would that be considered suicide?
W.I.L.D., What Is Life Definitively by A. Radical is the best work on simulation theory out there.
We thought about wiping it we have many others sum our under attack so i defend the transcendent realms.
Really? The Mandela effect? You lost me there... I feel like you got lazy with this one.
Wrote this in another comment -
'A glitch in the simulation is very unlikely a historical misconception (a differing letter in the name of the story) - it's way more likely to be a bug in a brain. Brains are the most complex things we have ever known and are most likely the things most prone to bugs. I'm not saying the simulation hypothesis is not real, but I'm saying this isn't very good evidence to support it.'
W.I.L.D., What Is Life Definitively by A. Radical is the best work on simulation theory.
@@nogussy The brain is a fractal of the simulation and if it is subject to bugs/flaws/glitches then by extrapolation the simulated reality will have too. Just my two penneth .
@@axiomtv5481 i'm assuming it must be a book, i couldn't find it here on YT .
Ever heard of the many worlds theory? I'd start there to open your mind and not limit yourself. The fact that we exist as conscious beings floating around in infinite space shows anything is possible.
Things like 'Young's double slit experiment' are what convince me that reality may be a simulation, the fact that particles change from a wave to a discernible particle only when observed seems suspiciously similar to how video games only render what the player sees. Basically why waste computing power on individual particles when nobody is looking, just simulate them as a simple wave of probability until somebody looks at them.
@@lostbutfreesoul I wouldn't think that its because they lack computing resources, its just why bother wasting energy on simulating the entire universe with infinite detail, if you can get away with just simulating the main stuff, then you might as well save on your power bill.
Also I don't believe that the people running the simulation are unimaginable creatures, I think they're just humans simulating the universe because they want to see how they themselves evolved in a simulated universe with the same starting conditions that they had.
Then you've misunderstood the results of the double slit experiment. A wave of light doesn't magically know when a human is looking at it closely and suddenly become a particle, rather it is always both a wave and a particle at the same time. Or, more accurately, every particle is not a fixed point in space but a normal distribution 'wave' of probability of where it could be. A wave does NOT resolve into a particle when observed. Look up Heisenburgs uncertainty principle. This is true for all matter in the universe.
Plus, observation isn't passive; looking at something interferes with it. This is especially true for looking at very small things. For example when you look through a microscope you have to blast the subject with energy (visible light). To see something smaller you need something with a shorter wavelength- an electron- which is what electron microscopes are for. Now if you want to see something even smaller than that you use gamma rays, which completely destroy whatever you're trying to observe, which brings me back to my original point that looking at something is actively and physically interacting with it, which can change the outcome of whatever you're trying to measure. (Granted, this doesn't apply to the double slit experiment, but still worth noting when talking about collapsing wave functions and stuff.)
@@kesa5593 I think that Bell's theorem / quantum venn diagram paradox is a much better evidence than the double slit experiment for the "culling" (it's what's called the mechanism that discards the parts of the world not being rendered in video games) hypothesis.
@@lostbutfreesoul Within a universe there are physical limitations on the computer components so even if you absorb power from stars or through the exploitation of physical phenomena, you are still limited as to how much you can generate. The amount of detail to simulate a single organism such as a mockingbird is beyond what all of our computers in this world can do and the components for the computers are reaching the minimal scale at the moment. If a universe has constant laws of physics, then even if it's different in nature, it does not have unlimited processing power. Even a multiplanetary civilization would have to optimize on the size of their supercomputers. If they are the original civilization, i.e. biological beings, quantum effects may not apply, preventing them from taking advantage of quantum computers.
All of you just want to jump on the "being different" ban wagon. The simulation theory contradicts itself at least several times. All human constructs made by...humans who don't have a grip on reality. I wish people would see how ridiculous they sound. I have ACTUAL experience in life. It can't be a simulation because so many things would cancel each other out. Anyone who believes this lives in fantasy land.
I remember there was someone who said that once we get to the point of creating our own ancestor simulation, we'll prove it one way or the other.
I wonder if the simulator makers are aware that we are aware of the possibility that we are a simulation
Joel- O I think the same thing all the time. They could back out of the game whenever they want bc we are getting to woke. Fuck lol
More than likely are, if they exist, they're gods to us. We don't really keep it a secret that we are aware, and even if, its not unlikely that they know
When I play the sims, my sim doesn't know he is a sim. A message appear what my sim wants.
Let's peer pressure them to give us whatever we want
It's possible.
I smoked a high dose of DMT 4 months ago for the first time, it was the most incredible experience of my life. I now believe deep down to my core that this reality isn't everything, that there are "realities" that exist outside of ours, that when we die we wake up in a different place where our true forms reside.
Only until they experience that realm. Also i feel our brian renders stuff out to run better. I feel psychedelics turn off fire walls to allow us to experience and see even hear what’s actually being shown.
The Mandela Effect is the pinnacle of hubris.
“I am so certain that human memory is so flawless that the universe must have inexplicably teleported me to another universe.”
What if we searched up Mandela effect on Google one day and no results show up 0_0
@IdkGoodName That doesn't make sense when you literally remember something. You're confusing memory loss with remembering something different.
My teacher just mentioned something along these lines today, when we were learning about the random function in Python. “This function is an algorithm, therefore it’s written by a human. It’s not really random, but it sure is complex. So, is your “conscience” really thinking that your actions are random or has it been affected by something around you.” I left his room speechless.
I am 32 and when i heard about mandela dying recently I was surprised. I remembered sitting in the floor in front of the TV and hearing the news when i was a kid sometime in the early 90s. Then other people started to experience the same thing and i was shocked. Hopefully is a faulty memory and not a glitch in the matrix machine. Also what in the world a scientist mean by "computer code in the universe", like really?? He should provide much more detail otherwise this "scientist " he is working against his own reputation.
The place where this falls apart is that we have to assume that the simulation not only simulates a reality, but that it simulates billions of consciousness. You know that you are conscious, so therefore you must live in a reality where that is possible. IT seems unlikely that a computer would be able to create a consciousness, let alone billions of them.
Yannick Karges just because your AI is supper complex doesn’t mean it’s self aware. Example whales have brains bigger than ours, but are they self aware? No, so there are some other factors to consciousnesses other than complexity. Maybe a soul, perhaps our neurons are special somehow, or most likely something we haven’t considered.
Jinx Dragon Well no it’s not an assumption, there’s basic characteristics that consciousness entails. Everything else you said I agree that is a possibility of our universe, and I’m just a simulated stimulus. Though there are many other theories about you’re existence, and believing in anything would play your hand against the universe. The odds would be your one belief vs infinite others, so I try not to believe in just a one thing.
"People's memories suck, so we're living in the Matrix"
No. People's alike mind the main problem, because they're not creating their own information. That means someone generating information for them before they first thought of an idea. All the people are doing is following up an idea without showing no perceptual awareness.
W.I.L.D., What Is Life Definitively by A. Radical is the best work on simulation theory out there.
You are still in the game after taking off the VR Head Set.
"Man I need to buy a new sim, all mine does is sit around smoke weed all day, and watch videos on the internet. I'm going to ask my mom as soon as she gets home for the 5.99" that's probably what's going on in the background of my simulation!! 😁😁
Anyone trying to prove we are living in a simulation will be faced with a very tricky problem. Assuming that you are, you cannot rely on working with other people to verify the simulation hypothesis (they may all just be part of the simulation and try to trick you into believing this world is not a simulation). This rules out verification by consensus and the scientific method.
All you are left with is observation and introspection. Unfortunately, you cannot fully trust your own observations because you can never completely rule out things like hallucinations and mental illness. So no matter what you do you will not be able to definitively answer that question.
I personally think there is a very decent chance that we are but I’m not that bothered by it.
To me the mandela effect prove that we live in two different simulation machines, but we still can interact with eachother, one for sucessfull people, one for unsucessfull people. One build you up if you manage to work and be sucessfull, one tear you down if you arent able to work and be sucessfull. Heaven or hell -.-
You’re an AMAZING youtuber, so glad I found you. Keep up the interesting videos!
We have to stop playing fortnite, or else the aliens will ‘accidentally’ trip over the power cable.
People need to stop citing the Mandela Effect as an argument for the Simulation Theory or the Simulation Theory will be forgotten. I find it likely we are in a simulation but the Mandela Effect is bad memory and the brain finding patterns. It's been debunked example after example, the Mandela reporting included.
Apart from mathematical complexity: time dilation in great concentrations of matter, the collapse of the wave function meaning that if we're not looking there may only exist waves of potentiality, the fact that you can generate a universe with a computer smaller than the universe, the fact that we know of energy sources in space that could give unprecedented amounts of power etc.
I've seen your profile picture before... Wth like... Wth
You know how to know we aren’t in a simulation? Simple, we are self aware! Just cause you can create an advanced sim doesn’t mean you can create self aware beings within the sim. I think therefore I am therefore I am not simulated.
sounds like something a sim would say....
I know this may sound bizarre but I was watching a tv-show called "The 100" and in season 3 it shows how and a young woman named Becca Franco (scientist she was from the future 97 years earlier ) found a pathway to access a human mind so she and the assistant Chris started working on an A. I known as A.L.I.E and so Becca franco had to lock up A.L.I.E because her answer for what was wrong with the world was "too many people" and as you can see with today's problems Trump and Biden/ Scientists are creating all these diseases because the world's population keeps on increasing. You might think this sounds stupid but it does not trust me, and if you don't believe me take a good look at the movie called "2012 " supposedly someone from the future "went back in time" and stopped the world from ending cause the world was supposed to end in 2012 but it was postponed someone stopped it. And referring back to the tv-show "The 100" when Lexa died in season 3 episode 7 I think her servant (I forgot his name) took a chip out of the back of her neck. So you see we may be dead already just living in the "City Of Light" reliving this world over and over again, and that's why some people say that earth is hell because we keep on getting sent back here just like in "The 100" tv-show.
It’s so irritating when you have to listen to ads not only leading up to the video and the ending of the video but within the video as well. It just ruins it.
you didnt mention Double-slit experiment,
.
that is basically how games work.
Biggest counterargument is that there are physical limits on Moore’s Law. Computing power won’t just keep expanding forever.
well to whoever made my sim, make me rich next time
Morpheus: What is "real"? Define "real."
Neo: Cookie?
I thought Mandela is still alive, knowing he died in 2013 is a little jarring too
Or maybe we live inside of a simulation, inside of a simulation, inside of a dream, inside of a simulation, inside of a nightmare, inside of a dream. Dun dun duh.
"There is somthing going on that we dont know" scaaaaryy
Great video like always!
5:54 best filmmakers in the *_GAME?!?_*
So this is my first video on your channel. That matters..
5:30 "In a way, that's comforting, because nothing matters.. On the other hand..."
And that's where the stream froze/buffered . I legit sat here for 10 seconds thinking "Wow, this guy is good." then the stream caught up, and I was in the middle of a curiosity stream commercial. And I'm like "Man, this guy is really GOOD!". Then I rewound the video, and discovered that this was nothing more than a perfectly timed anomoly in my own personal matrix.
Damn, that was funny.
*"it is vastly more likely that we are living in one such simulation, in a way, that's kind of comforting, in the sense that nothing really matters."*
What? So, if the universe is an accident, nothing matters, make peace with that. But if we are currently in a simulation (being maintained and managed by outsiders, possibly similar to ourselves), nothing matters?? How are those even remotely similar? We could join together to try and communicate/make signs showing we are self-aware and don't wish to die/be deleted. Plead our case for our code to not be recycled or what not. Or, at the very least for them not turn off the simulation (in a OT Noah's Flood-style reboot).
I'm just not seeing how, if we are in a simulation, nothing matters. (After all, We were put here. There are mindful forces outside our box that decide our fate.) Do people simply want to be blissful in believing nothing matters regardless of correlating warnings of religions and notions of philosophy try to say? ..Did I just answer my own question?..
before watching this i will guess: we can't
Sounds like Infinite Tsukuyomi....
Many of my high thoughts end in the conclusion that we live in a simulation
By high thoughts do you mean you were high?
João Pedro Scherer de Sampaio Carvalho haha
Wait I got it we can check if we are in a simulation its so simple if we create like thousands of simulation games then somewhere our world's power and quality decreases if we are in a simulation
Imagine having own universe where you can do everything what you want
You'd eventually get bored and decide to lose yourself in a holofractographic universe. Oh wait.
Yeah its called Lucid Dreaming :)
I could have sworn English muffins were pre-sliced.
I dunno, can computers simulate infinite "space"? I would guess not? Even if a computer had 100 to the power of 100 Terrabytes of rom, any environment created would be finite, wouldn't it? Same could be said with any given number. If we find that our "universe" has a border, like you would find in a video game, would that prove we are in a simulation? I don't know. It was just a thought.
even if we are in a simulation, why does that matter? Everything looks real, same as we wouldnt be in a simulation. If they are both the same, then why does it matter? It wont ever affect us
this is my favorite video you've made.
You should have mentioned the "Double Slit experiment". Why render the exact path, way down at the photon level, unless something is currently monitoring that path.
Oh, and stop using The Matrix as your example, use "The Thirteenth Floor" instead. That simulation in "The Thirteenth Floor" was full of Non Player Characters, which is what we are. We aren't like Agent Smith, who knows he is a "program", and we aren't humans floating in a pod, plugged into "the Matrix". One last point, our simulation is running at super high speed compared to the "real" outside world. Imagine you are a nineth grader in the year 3021 studying ancient history, and you pick the assignment "What if Donald Trump had won the 2016 election". You'd tell your computer to start off with a simulation running from the year 1501 and stopping at the year 2081. You'd tell the computer to run the simulation at high speed so that one year in the simulation would complete in one minute in the outside world of the nineth grader. The simulation would finish running in less than 10 hours and you could see the results. Also, you could ask your computer, "What was the highest grossing movie that the 'people' in the simulation came up with", and then you could watch that movie.
There are more interesting solutions to this thought experiment
Okay now that is weird... it was definitely the Bearenstein bear.
imagine if the world we live in is just run by some random 12-year-old playing Sims 19,637 in the year 20358
Call me when some actual evidence arises that we're in a simulation. Until then, it's just a mildly interesting thought experiment.
All it takes is for someone to find the reset button to the simulation and we wouldn't be here.
Remember! Reality's an illusion, the universe is a hologram, buy gold! Byeeee!
I have a theory: the radio vibrance of nothingness pressurized to make nothing into a white space of quarks and imploded the seconds of its existence to create the first atoms. The backrooms are ways to escape the liminal space of our reality and you have to escape them if you want to get back to reality. Dreams just create a stimuli that teleport you to liminal dimensions where you have barely any consciousness and its built specifically based on your thoughts and emotions.
The real answer is it doesn't matter if you're in a simulation or not. Your life is your life, no matter what context the universe is in.
is it really your life, if someone's controls you? how can you be sure you're in control?
If I ever have a chance to meet a guy who looks so squared, that proves that I am in a simulation
Why is dissociation not mentioned here? And where's the theories on how to break trough and take control?
Do you think that we are microbes and live in SOMEONE'S BODY
There migh be paralel Earths ...if you time-space you go in a paralel wolrd ...its complicated
Well if this is true....the person controlling my life must hate me for making it so bad all the time!
the thing is though, even if we were living in a simulation, it wouldn't matter. We wouldn't be able to change anything, so why care at all?
If we are in a simulation, then why was it started?
Imagining what super advanced civilizations want is just random guessing based from our civilization. An interesting thought presented in a kurzgezagt video is "Imagine the smartest ant ever seeing an amusement park - it's curious about what humans are up to, so you try to explain. Unfortunately, the ant just doesn't understand. The concept of rollercoasters and standing in lines and holidays and fun doesn't make sense to an ant living an ant life. It's the same with us and a post human being. Compared to them, we are ants. Running a simulation for fun or science, might be an absurdly stupid idea for them."
Why was any video game created? Think about just being a character in a game, if you've ever played The Sims it's a perfect example, just imagine that we are inside an advanced version of that. Made simply for random amusement.
Why was Quantum started?
About the error codes we also have A, T, C, & G. Now the question is how do we determine that these codes evolved without a creator or designer?
Jinx Dragon Oh cool
Jinx Dragon So the simulator would be some kind of godhead?
www.google.com/amp/s/scitechdaily.com/dna-is-just-one-among-millions-of-possible-genetic-molecules-clues-for-origin-of-life-search-for-extraterrestrial-biology/amp/
The Sims just got 999x more intense
*iF tHe SiMuLaTiOn HyPoThEsIs Is ReAl, WhErE aRe AlL tHe AgEnTs????*
I love your videos, but come on
The Mandela effect?
Why is that so strange to include? I've heard that mentioned many times with simulation theory. It's like you can't imagine a program having its historical data rewritten.
I have three problems with the simulation theory:
1. Its stupid
2. There is no reason to make a simulation
3. Even if we did live in one, it wouldn't change anything
I think the simulation is perception itself. It’s a dream within a dream within a dream. Think of those mirrors across one another that never end. Just my opinion based on experience.
plot twist: We live in the sims 5
_If_ the universe is a simulation at the subatomic level, then I wonder if the entities running the simulation would even be able to detect any life in it, even sapient life. Perhaps some alien professor will noticed yet another planet with unusual chemical activity and have its grad student do their thesis on it. However, if it's based on humans and/or all animals and just concentrates on our impressions & internal models... that actually seems even more complicated (but probably uses a lot less RAM). In that case, 2020 must be the year the cat walked across the keyboard.
In general though, it's presumptuous to assume that if *we* _may_ be able to do it someday then some unknown, unprovable intelligence has already done so _and_ we're the result. That grad student probably wouldn't get the results published.
BTW, I have to wonder if there was a lot of 1980s file footage shown when Nelson Mandela passed away, which _may_ have done something... Though it's likely lots of people already assumed he had passed away within a few years of Apartheid ending. As for the bears, that kind of misreading/assuming thing is extremely common.
The Mandela Effect can be explained as your brain saving energy by using shortcuts. Also, corrupted memories could explain them. In the case with the Berenstain Bears, it sounds more normal if it is the Berenstein Bears, so that's how we remembered it. Also, if we are living in a simulation, it would probably use a lot of energy. Also, I don't understand who would make these simulations and what is the reason for their existence.
What if we live in a simulation within a simukation
Big brain tíme
th-cam.com/video/FK_ke_LgOfU/w-d-xo.html
This is an easy question to answer we're not in a simulation because no one who's ever died has respawned at there bed... unless, OH NO! We're playing in Hardcore mode!
The hypothesis simulation is *strictly* forbidden in my country (France), by the Gayssot's law.
I'd like to see your source for that, because it's kind of a leap to go from "you can't deny the Holocaust happened" to "you can't question the nature of reality".
@@NotHPotter i'm think so yeah portal gun rick not self-aware able to travel alternative people universe
If we are in a simulation then they gave us to much knowledge
We all should set this in mind that stimulation are not so good
Our Gods will see this not so good
Hopefully we could find some glitches then
Stimulation?
also nice fairytale.
What about using quantum computers to find out if we are in a simulation?
Besides Quantum Computers. What technology can digitally record and save time into a file?
Not in a simulation God put us on this Earth He is the creator It’s because of him we live it’s because of him we have peace joy happiness It’s because of him we John:316 He sent his son to die for us because we were doomed to hell People have to Realize That we live on a perfect earth We’re at 70° in the summer And 30° in the winter And every other planet is not livable That didn’t happen because of the rock that hit to hurt
Really!? You talk about how you forgot the name of the first book you read as evidence for living in a simulation?
But it wasn't just him, it was millions of people
@@suyashahuja6648 nope it's a fake is a just data file
It might be backwards , always is...No we do not live in a simulation BUT we can and might make it into one !!!!
I recently watched “Zootropolis” and I was puzzled, because I swore the movie was called “Zootopia.”
This video could be made by the simulators trying to prove to us there’s no proof we’re in a simulation.
Is there proof of a simulation?
Premintex be quiet you simulation
@@charliefox5415 but you're also a simulation...
ΔLΠ/ but I’m not a simulation myself
@@charliefox5415 how would I know? I didn't think for you. Did you think for me? Noone can answer.
Our parent universe made our simulation to be a replica of their species and history so they could understand their past and events that didn't get recorded
Simulation = Creation
If we are a simulation/creation then it follows that the simulator/creator has a purpose. I am persuaded that the purpose is more meaningful than entertainment or research.
I actually remember the Berenstain Bears as Berenstain Bears. I really don't believe in the Mandela effect.
player(mind)....computer(brain)...avatar(body).....eat bacon and cheese lose life points...eat salad and water and fish gain life points....excercise get faster(turbo)...collect gold coins....try not to get rid of gold coins.....Its called Life, NOT HARD TO FIGURE OUT
Hey Second Thought, why is this video so quiet? Right click on the video and select 'Stats for nerds'. From there, you'll see that TH-cam measures the audio as 10 dB too quiet. You need to boost your levels on future videos.
Is this the real life?
Or is this just fantasy?
Step 1, never gave any sex so you don’t know reality.
THIS IS THE MOST RECCURING QUESTION TO ME ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF UNIVERSE.
Nikesh Kumar no bro we are nota simation
@@talhailyas7229 Its very likely that we are.
If we live in a simulation, could we be able to open up a console, like in most pc games, to just do whatever we want
Straight to curiosity stream
Mandela was the President in the 1990s, and his election was one of the most important events of the decade? How is that a thing?
I think we are just 'testing sims', and we are being controlled by someone from a very advanced civilisation, and the one(who is controlling us) is practising how to play this game or use the sims, so that they can use another sims in their military
We are not sims because everything is perfect and we are the creators of our own destiny
No after nanotechnology you can go smaller which is picotechnology to view atoms etc.
*I could have sworn I've heard all these points before in other videos, call it de ja vu or a glitch in the matrix, but I know the Mandela effect was never about being in a simulation.*
Amazing video
Is there a video explaining what the scientist found "mathematical code in quartz". Or can someone explain.
I remember when i was young and in 4th class, our teacher was showing us answers of a chapter involving an elephant who saved his master, she(the teacher) even threw a boy's copy when he was writting in rough copy, and then when i went absent for 2 or 3 days and came back to school, that teacher was showing us answers of the same chapter!!! I still remember when i asked her "man we did this a while ago", she said that when did we did it??
I mean wtf i remember that she was showing us answers and i had one more incident, which is a bit similar to this happened to me when i was very young(i think 8 yrs old)
I remember these things becuz these things sometimes come to my mind when i am going to sleep :(
Heaven is a cartoon dimension.