Its usually the opposite lol. Successful defense lawyers usually have to "carry alot of water" so to speak for big time lawyers before being given the opportunity to step up. Prosecutors are often young and relatively new to the trade.
@@mikimiyazaki All a defense attorney has to do is be hired. They have to be first chair on their first murder trial some time. Its public knowledge that she has been a license attorney since 2018. My guess is the DA has been an attorney longer than that - this guy is THE District Attorney of Kenosha County. Prosecutors are also in the courtroom far more than a private defense attorney (at least before they become the DA). There are many lawyers who choose to be prosecutors for their entire career - if the DA's office has a handful of them , one of career prosecutors would have been lead in this case.
She really tried. She could have easily redacted the texts and not mentioned SB by name or implied they " found the body " and it would not have breached State v Denny. The redacted texts could have been read in and she could have simply asked the officer if he had followed up on those texts and she would have gotten her point across had the officer answered no. However she chose to go further than that and that's what breached State v Denny. She knew what she did shame on her for implying someone was the actual murderer without any evidence to back that claim.
Does she not know what she said??? She didn’t point out specifically LE errors she pointed out Saddy! She mentioned Saddy and her friend directly! If you take up time and look up Denny it’s 💯 on point!
I could not find any documentary about the case itself on TH-cam, so if any of you guys has knowledge of some including its title, please let me know, so I can watch it myself. Thank you
Anyone else notice how close or fond she seems to be towards ZA?.. also... her stating that RG wasnt interested in Sadie and telling all his friends he planned to break up with her was a petty below the belt comment that had zero to do with the crime. Petty.
The Defense Lawyer had an opportunity here. I’m Nts she brought it forward correctly? Police never brought another suspect to look into?? She had an opportunity just not sure she handled it correctly to bring her point across and agreed to. This is to this video nothing else
This judge needs to retire, seems like he is constantly searching for his words, rarely completes a sentence/thought, then forgets what he was talking about
sweety you realise they still have rules and decorum they are supposed to follow... :l right? Also I've sat for many cases live and not and they are all like this 💀quit the bs
@@mary-chrisstaples9767 Maybe she's defending the publics right to see these cases. I mean that's the whole point for the cameras in the first place. Making a mockery out of it in saying the judges, prosecuters and defense attornys are putting on a show for the cameras instead of doing their job which they swore an oath to do, is just appalling.
Or perhaps the cameras becoming more common are just publicly exposing exactly how far our justice system has fallen. We have police and investigators ignoring evidence, doing roughshod investigations, fudging evidence for supreme courts. It's a mockery, and the job of the defence is to zealously defend their client by exposing this.
If you knew anything about the judicial system… it’s the jury that determines guilty or not guilty. Not the judge. 😂 It was clean as day Kyle was innocent! All on video. That’s why the prosecution did such a horrible job!
This court ans judge had a very bad reputation of buthered trial. I know he is guilty, i believe her daughter i can feel the pain she witnessed about her mother. But this court is the one who allow kyle rittenhouse to be far right image he is now. Thats why i got a feeling that the killer will be aquitted
![F.HERO Ft. JSPKK x ลำไย ไหทองคำ x M-PEE - ไม่สนิทบิดหมด (Thai Riders Anthem) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kPJZ0UihBfk/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/trending/obsessed-ex-boyfriend-murder-trial-wi-v-zachariah-anderson/?
Did you decide not to air the rest of this trial?
My guess is that this prosecutor is much more experienced than the defense attorney. Hopefully she will come away from this having learned something.
Its usually the opposite lol. Successful defense lawyers usually have to "carry alot of water" so to speak for big time lawyers before being given the opportunity to step up. Prosecutors are often young and relatively new to the trade.
@@mikimiyazaki All a defense attorney has to do is be hired. They have to be first chair on their first murder trial some time. Its public knowledge that she has been a license attorney since 2018. My guess is the DA has been an attorney longer than that - this guy is THE District Attorney of Kenosha County. Prosecutors are also in the courtroom far more than a private defense attorney (at least before they become the DA). There are many lawyers who choose to be prosecutors for their entire career - if the DA's office has a handful of them , one of career prosecutors would have been lead in this case.
She really tried. She could have easily redacted the texts and not mentioned SB by name or implied they " found the body " and it would not have breached State v Denny. The redacted texts could have been read in and she could have simply asked the officer if he had followed up on those texts and she would have gotten her point across had the officer answered no. However she chose to go further than that and that's what breached State v Denny. She knew what she did shame on her for implying someone was the actual murderer without any evidence to back that claim.
That doesn’t carry the same impact ! Or as she did, she could include it in her opening declaration…
Now we’re cross-talking and losing direction…
Guilty then and still Guilty now!
Lock that killer up!
Thank you!
Has the Jury returned a verdict in this case?
No
Zach's bully is RUDE. Plain and simple. To all. The judge, the prosecutor, some witnesses.
Huh??? What are you saying?
There was discovery wasn’t there? She was a little entitled and snappy. She’s young apparently immature, hopefully she’ll learn from this.
Very immature
Very rude and narcissistic
She will go far.
Great PROSECUTOR! He is guilty! THE END
Defense really has to ask the difference? Girl, just make your record and drop it.
Does she not know what she said??? She didn’t point out specifically LE errors she pointed out Saddy!
She mentioned Saddy and her friend directly! If you take up time and look up Denny it’s 💯 on point!
DON'T YOU GET BRAZEN WITH ME!
Lol
I would had paid to have him on the Darrell Brooks Case!
Somebody’s got their britches in a knot!
" I found it " - you are not as good as you think. THEY found your foul attempt in YOUR OPENING STATEMENT.
This prosecutor is excellent!!
I feel like they are arguing how to define every definition
Is this the Rittenhouse Judge?
Yes.
Unfortunately and he's an a****** to
Unfortunately.
Yes and first Jensen trial in 2008
Yes
Does anyone feel like there watching paint dry or grass to grow whoever this judge answers something.
Not at all. Only when reading worthless comments from you, Urine LOL
It’s over Defense. Knock it off.
I could not find any documentary about the case itself on TH-cam, so if any of you guys has knowledge of some including its title, please let me know, so I can watch it myself. Thank you
I say this with the most respect, but your Honor, it is time to retire gracefully and enjoy the spoils you have sewn 🦅
sown
Why?
2:26 She looks at the judge and says “right?” The judge doesn’t have to respond to you or verify your thought!
The defense has nothing.😴🙄
The defense attorney’s botched hair color is driving me crazy
What is that mark on the right side of her face? Looks like someone hit her in the face
@@heatherann1560 Hahahaaaa!!!! That has been bugging me too.
@@heatherann1560 it looks like a birth mark often called a “port wine stain”. If so, rather inappropriate to criticize her for it
nothing wrong with her hair and that is what you're taking from this trial? Personal slurs against a womans hair? Grow up
@@60toodles LOL 😵Hair??? It’s that face! 🤮Do her a favor and even it up. Client, just do what she’s defending you for already!!! 👊🏼
Anyone else notice how close or fond she seems to be towards ZA?.. also... her stating that RG wasnt interested in Sadie and telling all his friends he planned to break up with her was a petty below the belt comment that had zero to do with the crime. Petty.
Thanks God he is in prison!? Right!?
I can’t even watch this trial cause this judge drives me crazy..ummm uhhh ummm constantly!
Agreed! Any trial he presides over everyone plan n a couple of extra weeks…for… all… the… umms… uhhs… and pauses!!!
YES! Was wondering if it was just me noticing that. I believe it's retirement time
23: 30 I think there is something going on between the client and the lawyer. Pause the clip then play it from there 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I thought I was the only one , and it looked like he mumble something to her
Y’all just take something from nothing smh
@@reallyitsbrit nah the eyes said it all
Oooohhhhh. Good eye spy. We all know that googoo eye energy.
Wait - how is the fact that other credible leads weren't followed by investigators NOT relevant and accusatory of a specific person?
What’s blonde’s problem?
They attorneys are both right and the judge is confused and waffling !!!
NO! The state is right in the Denny violation! She just word by word quoted what it protects! It’s like an alibi defense!
Again back and forth arguing like two kids get on with it.
The defense attorneys voice is so annoying 🙄 She looks so much like Amber Heard
You’re crazy!
⏩ Just keep in mind:
*They are paid by the minute!*
And regardless!
The Defense Lawyer had an opportunity here. I’m Nts she brought it forward correctly? Police never brought another suspect to look into?? She had an opportunity just not sure she handled it correctly to bring her point across and agreed to. This is to this video nothing else
Hell yeah Judge Schroeder!!!!
DON'T YOU GET BRAZEN WITH ME
@@deejay2294 beautiful
The defendants pupils are extremely small. His girlfriends are not. Maybe he is on drugs??
Defense atty is in fight or flight. This is how she fights with her boyfriend. Sarc, hand gestures, ,, all that's missing is foot stomping
Don’t get personal. It makes you look weak.
She’s a bad lawyer. PERIOD :)
@@Brrrettt Who are you Brett to tell others what to do?
Don't answer.
@@dsoule4902 I told you what NOT to do.. big difference.
This judge needs to retire, seems like he is constantly searching for his words, rarely completes a sentence/thought, then forgets what he was talking about
LOL Shut up
Why is she talking like a 5yr old lol
JUGE make a ruling move on
Uncharrrged pickles. How's the calzone?
This judge cant even complete a sentence.
just like BIDEN lol
@@Brooklyn11226 Lol dementia Biden
@@Brooklyn11226 not as bad as corrupt trump the sociopath narcissist pathological liar conman swindler and very uneducated
What’s with the hair flip at 15:05. Defense lawyer is so unlikeable
What is that at either side of the judges mouth..🤔
A birth mark
This prosecutor seems to be a hell of lot better then Binger and fat boy!!!
Be nice
This is the Elected DA Binger and fat boys are his assistants
Lol Binger didn't retire in shame?
Trials today are not about justice. It's all about putting on drama for the camera's in the courtroom!
sweety you realise they still have rules and decorum they are supposed to follow... :l right? Also I've sat for many cases live and not and they are all like this 💀quit the bs
@@_Its.Just.Felix_ why so snarky? It’s just a comment.
@@mary-chrisstaples9767 Maybe she's defending the publics right to see these cases. I mean that's the whole point for the cameras in the first place. Making a mockery out of it in saying the judges, prosecuters and defense attornys are putting on a show for the cameras instead of doing their job which they swore an oath to do, is just appalling.
Or perhaps the cameras becoming more common are just publicly exposing exactly how far our justice system has fallen. We have police and investigators ignoring evidence, doing roughshod investigations, fudging evidence for supreme courts. It's a mockery, and the job of the defence is to zealously defend their client by exposing this.
That judge again 🤦♂️ justice isn't happening here today folks.
Justice was served
Justice was served!
Justice was served in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. Hopefully you never end up in his situation!
You don't know what you're talking about.
If you knew anything about the judicial system… it’s the jury that determines guilty or not guilty. Not the judge. 😂 It was clean as day Kyle was innocent! All on video. That’s why the prosecution did such a horrible job!
So was it mistrialed or what?
Yea its time to think about retirement 👴
Ex boyfriend who????
20:15 - 20:38
Alls I have to this judge is TA TA TA TADAY JUNIOR.
My favourite judge!!!!
Please don’t make me throw up.
@@eloise22422 yay my super duper favourite judge of alllllllll time!! Is that better??? xoxoxoxoxoxo
@@kristypilip1971 hahaha. Ok ok ok. I was just joking kind of. Haha
Defense Attorney Chubby Ivanka Trump
😂
Female version of Thomas Binger
❤😂
Not chubby. Even if she was…so?
@@britt3090 she may actually have an eating disorder! She’s way too skinny!!!
Ugh... this judge again. He's rotten
For being fair? Lol
Blame the prosecution for not having a case! Judge Schroeder is awesome!
@@bonecoldfleasaustin 🤣🤣🤣🤣right the same Judge who let a Racist off from murder smh
@@alphonsowhite6348 KR isn’t racist…. You realize all those he unalived were white right? Making race an issue when it’s not is racist itself.
@@alphonsowhite6348 Who would that be?
Lol…this lady is a lot.
This court ans judge had a very bad reputation of buthered trial. I know he is guilty, i believe her daughter i can feel the pain she witnessed about her mother. But this court is the one who allow kyle rittenhouse to be far right image he is now. Thats why i got a feeling that the killer will be aquitted
That's not how the law works. You disagree with the outcome of a different trial therefore don't prosecute this case.