That comparison means nothing, just as the list of armies of the world means nothing at all, nor does it show how strong someone is. The entire NATO must not attack one North Korea, which is 30 in the world, or one Iran? Those comparisons are ridiculous!
@@RobertMarshall-d2nimagine believing western news...And more than 30% of the land are occupied by Russian now...Ur clown zelensky need to go to the front tier because they ran out of innocent men
@@puzzled012 how so? Nato is not currently involved in the conflict, they have trained Ukrainian soldiers and given them equipment but have not sent troops or military personal/ large amounts of equipment
@@emanuelefilosa788 Are you drunk ?? Just to put this out on the table: what are you writing? Learn how to spell!! For your first text: NO! Most of the armies in Nato countries are NOT in Ukraine fighting Russia, all foreign fighters are volunteers - if any nato country’s actual military gets involved we’d all been nuked to bits by the Russians by now. Ukraine stood for a long time on its own before getting support(equipment only-excluding volunteers) by NATO countries. Thi armamento isn’t even a word in the English dictionary nor is it a term so stop talking BS!! Romania ranked higher in military power before the ukr-russo war, of course only theoretically as we’ve seen the past two years. Only reason Ukraine is no. 18 today is because almost all men over 18 are volunteering in the Ukrainian army which makes the ukr. Military active fighters 900 thousand with 1,3 million reserve. There are 32 countries in Nato, losing America doesn’t make nato unarmed! There are still elite military fighting forces like France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Not to mention how both Finland and Sweden just joined. If even USA left NATO then thereafter declared war on NATO they wouldn’t even come close!! America is overrated as a country in military power, economics and quality. America may be leading in military research but closely followed by rivals such as China. Germany is also very high on the list on Military Research. Hell Germany published the Panther KF51 some few months ago, directly competing the American m1 abrams family. You need to stop watching whatever kind of brainwashing “America is the most technologically advanced country” and “America is better than everyone else if it weren’t for the USA the rest of the world would’ve been dead” type brainwashing. America isn’t even top three most technologically developed countries with Japan in first place closely followed by South Korea.
Don't even bother. This guy is an idiot and makes videos for idiots like himself. Comparing NATO without USA to Russia is like comparing ODKB(CSTO) without Russia to US Army. Just a very low IQ way to flatter ego of many pro-russian bots that follow his channel.
@@edwarren804 Given to the fact that Russia's 2 week long invasion turned into a 2 and a half year long endeavor right now, coupled with the endless videos of drone footage and on-ground recordings of tanks and soldiers getting taken out, yeah I'd say it's pretty true
@@user-tj1vg4zn5p The Iraqi army was considerably more than Ukraine, Iraq was using Russian equipment to their bad luck. Fighting Ukraine in comparison to the 4th largest army in the world, Russia is found lacking.
@@terrypennington2519 give to the fact Russia and Ukraine both Uses Russian Wepons Even Ukranie Uses Russian Wepons too and not everything is truth what you seen because this is war.
TrueMilitary sounds like a cooler name and it matches your profile pic. Also. Sus color scheme big dog. By the way, good music and I love how the slides are done.
It’s hilarious how you completely suck up our western media which is essentially propaganda. It’s a tool used by everyone to make their citizens believe all is fine. Ukraine is getting pasted to the walls. 40-50% of their fighting aged men are either dead or wounded. Why do you think so many Ukrainian men are now fleeing Ukraine?? Russia still has millions and millions of fighting aged citizens they can call upon. Has History taught you ANYTHING about the way Russia and the former Soviet Union fight their wars? In its entire military existence in the 20th and 21st century, the Russians have only ever lost a single conflict, a conflict that NATO member states themselves lost also and that is in Afghanistan.
Interesting video idea. However, the Russian Army equipment numbers aren't taking the Russian war losses in account. In some of those categories the Russian Army would be lucky to have half of those numbers in workable condition. These types of videos base their figures on the Military Balance numbers. The Military Balance figures ignore their wartime losses. The Military Balance also ignore equipment that worn out from age.
Hi, except using the Military Balance I'm keeping up with war losses with the help of websites such as Oryx and Warspotting. I'm also tracking Russian deliveries of a new equipment. If comes to the accuracy of the Military Balance so it's the most accurate when it's released. Let's be honest that currently except countries, which have ongoing war like Russia and Ukraine keeping up with deliveries of new equipment is easy. I've also made Russia vs Ukraine in 2022, and back then Russia had a lot more of equipment. th-cam.com/video/AiRtbqWoP7g/w-d-xo.html
@@MILITARY-TUBE Oryx consistently undercounds Russian equipment compared Andrew Perputa's numbers. Covert Cabal keeps tracks of Russian tanks +artillery pieces+armored vehicles in storage. Your numbers and Covert Cabal's numbers aren't close. The Russian Army has about 3000 armor vehicles such as BMPs+BTRs+APCs left not counting more useless armor vehicles. 28000 where did that number come from? The Russians are losing about 5 tanks + 10 BMPs, BTRs, APCs combined together per day according Andrew's numbers. The Russian Army reserves numbers that you quoted are mainly guys who have done their required service years ago. Paper organization. How much of the Russian equipment is worn out garbage? If your numbers were somewhat accurate the Russian Army would have destroyed the Ukrainian Army long ago.
Andrew Perputa does the same what Oryx, and Warspotting means he recognizes vehicles from videos and photos found on the X, and the Telegram. If comes to the actual losses, they are bigger than those confirmed on Oryx, Warspoting, and Andrew Perputa's materials, because not everything can be documented on video or photo. Russia has 3 thousand BMPs, BTRs, and APCs but in reserve. Publications like The Military Balance and Covert Cabals videos prove that. However, the recent Kings of General video suggests that Russia currently has no BTRs in reserve. th-cam.com/video/g8QSdMB-isc/w-d-xo.html Covert Cabal shows the number of equipment left in storage/reserve not overall, which is used by the actual soldiers on the frontline, and by the units stationed in Russia. In simple words, Russia does not withdraw all of its vehicles from Ukraine and puts them in line for a nice satellite photo. Also, no one knows how big percentage of the equipment in the storage is worn out. However the equipment in storage is mostly used to a small extent, and gets broken by the environmental processes of the areas, in which it's stored, it is rain, snow, and low temperatures. Keep in mind that the vehicles shown in Covert Cabal's videos have been stored there since the times of the Soviet Union. The same goes for the readiness of the equipment used by active Russian units. No one knows the percentage of ready-to-used equipment. However in this case the vehicles get worn out mainly because of the usage and enemy actions, not environmental processes. 28 thousand is the overall number of armored vehicles such as BMPs, BMDs, BRMs, BTRs, GAZ Tigrs, IVECO LMVs, BMP-Ts, BRDMs, MT-LBs, Typhoon-Ks, Z-STS Akhmats, GAZ-3937 Vodniks, support vehicles, like BREM, IMR/-2/3 etc. The number, which is below is the number in reserve, in this case, 3900. It came from the Military Balance 2024 and was updated from external links, like Oryx, Warspotting, news from Army Recognition, United24, Wikipedia, Defence24, videos made by Covert Cabal, Kings and Generals, etc. If comes to the Russian "success" in Ukraine so it's not all about the number of equipment, because currently Ukraine has enough resources to defend itself. Enough is to check the list of equipment delivered to Ukraine on Wikipedia to realize that it could arm the whole Europe. It's more about things like tactics, surveillance, and the quality of leadership. The funny thing is that Russia does not have even a numerical advantage in Ukraine. Russia has overall around 700 thousand soldiers in Ukraine involved in the operations on all fronts versus 880 thousand Ukrainian ones. Russia has a lot more than 3 thousand BMPs, BTRs, and other APCs. For example, experts estimate that only in the Southern part of Ukraine Russia uses around 3 thousand tanks, 7 thousand infantry fighting vehicles (this number doesn't take into account vehicles like MRAPs, BTRs except BTR-80A and BTR-82A, and support vehicles), 5 thousand various artillery pieces, 12 hundred MLRS systems, 300 helicopters, and 300 aircraft. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_aid_to_Ukraine_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War# defence24.pl/wojna-na-ukrainie-raport-specjalny-defence24/zelenski-ujawnia-liczbe-zolnierzy-mamy-880-tysiecy www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/06/15/putin-says-almost-700k-russian-troops-fighting-in-ukraine-a85419 th-cam.com/video/gk7D_TliAuE/w-d-xo.html
Если учитывать то что Мы с НАТО воюем то информация примерно нормальная Ты мне скажешь почему Русские с НАТО воюют? А тебя не смущает то что НАТО технику посылает на Украину!? Патроны? И ТД.!? Тебя это вообще не смущает? Да!?
@@МаксимНещерет-б6чIf Nato were truly at war with Russia, then you'd be fighting inside of Russia instead of Ukraine. The US is sending ammo that is ending its viable usage status, meaning it's at the point where it's beginning to become a liability. Let's say a mortar shell has a dud rate of 1 in 1,000 for its first 5 years, then from 5 to 7 years its 5 in 1,000, that's beyond the acceptable rate for the US. The US will either use them up in training exercises or just give them away when they hit the 5 year. (depending on the variation or type). Iran, North Korea, China have all been supplying Russia with weapons since the early days, Russia has also used its territories to wage war against Ukraine. It's even rumored that North Korea has been sending actual troops now, which is more than any Nato country has done.
1. Europe is looking pretty just from the mandatory service numbers, that is, the lack of them, with only 9 out of 31 countries having it, which means 22 countries have volunteer armed forces, which means they are not conscripts, which means they are more professional, which means better trained and motivated, which translates to the battlefield (Russia's conscripts would be crushed, no matter how many are on the field). 2. In fact, they are looking good across the board, as in, 'Go deal with the other shit Dictatorships around the world, we have the shit dictatorship of Russia covered, America." 3. I did not see motorcycles, golf carts, and scooters in the lists. Russia is definitely ahead in those categories. 4. Russia has a drone advantage, but that is easily made up by Europe's overwhelming industrial capacity, and by the time of any conflict, drones may be obsolete. 5. I had to turn the music way down.
That was a very interesting matchup...forgot to mention part of the equipment and personnel may be depleted on the russia side if it were from today's numbers.....also dont forget that Some Nato Members have said they will be raising their defense budget so that means more soldiers and weapons being added to its force and dont forget that those NATO countries are actually on the east as well so it would be a faster delivery to battle if it were done around the borders....so crazy that so many smaller countries can have a very tough army if needed 😊 i dont get why some are bent over hating Russia or US/NATO, dont forget we're all human and the reason why theres a fight is because the big guys in power chose it. Poor men dying for rich men's ego.
Much? Like if all country produces gets destroyed in Ukraine that is not really much, for example france literally have no shells since it was transferred to Ukraine. Not to mention that mobilizing all of NATO members is literally impossible it will be logistic hell and i really doubt how much NATO members will join war if it happens
THX for the effort. You got my like. Some things are not acurate... like the russian carier Kuziencow. It burned down and will be scrapped. The same is with rusian hevy machinery & planes, not operational anymore :). There are alsow some major purchasing going on in Europe since the the russian invasion... so we will have to wait until the turmoil is over.
Мы в год только полностью новых танков делаем от 100-150. При этом ремонтируем около 500 единиц техники со складов.(и это данные на прошлый год). Напомни сколько новых, не модернизированных танков делается в НАТО. Разве что леопарды по 10-20 штук в год и все. Ну и если наша армия такая слабая то почему бы вам не присоединиться и добить нас вместе с "могущественной" украиной? А, наверное вы вспомнили сколько у нас ядерного оружия. Ну так сидите и молчите.
@@electromagnet249 😆We all "belive" 😉😉you . Because we don't have access to ORYX or other genuine information source... But Ukraine lost all the "biolabs" and the "NATO battle moscitos & atack goose" 😉😉 Rusian "technology" 🤣
Люди верят, что Россия использует полную мощность своей армии на Украине)) Будь это так, потери мирных граждан были бы в 1000 раз больше, а да, в России же животные, им похуй на людей, это не цивилизованный запад
The only way that a NATO V Russia conflict could happen is if Russia decided to invade a NATO member, NATO has no intention of invading Russia, if it happened not only would the Russians be facing NATO military forces they would also have to contend with local resistance fighters behind their lines, and the Russians themselves proved back in W.W.II that those fighters can tie up a lot of resources needed on the front line.
The problem is that Russia does not only border NATO. China also has some unresolved territorial issues with Russia, such as "unequal treaties", but Russia has not returned the occupied territories. Russia cannot use all its potential against NATO, it must leave security on other "fronts". we forget that NATO also borders Russia in the Arctic Ocean. While NATO can focus on frontline operations, Russia must secure its strategic Arctic hinterland. In addition, we must take into account that the presented data is not up-to-date. Russia is losing more equipment in Ukraine than it can produce. The war in Ukraine also perfectly showed how technically backward Russian military equipment is. It no longer even resembles the frontline operations of World War II, but the trench fighting of the fronts of World War I. Even the design of combat vehicles has regressed and they are starting to resemble the first tanks (although to me they look more like medieval battering rams for ramming the gates of fortresses). Russians improvise at every step. Their entire army is makeshift. Just 3 years ago they were the second strongest army in the world, today they are a laughing stock and the second strongest army in Ukraine. I'm very curious about which Russian tank's crew will posthumously receive the award for the tank's farthest or highest flying turret.
Что ты несёшь?))) Какие споры с Китаем?)) Какая устаревшая армия? Её уже модернизировали после 2022, и сейчас это хорошо видно. Про то, что украина вторая армия мира я вообще молчу. Ты откуда информацию берёшь?
And our problem is that we can not understand the Russia Ukraine conflict U claim Russian military is under performing in Ukraine not considering the billions of military aid provided by NATO for Ukraine And if West thinks Russia is week why don't they just enter directly and save Ukraine Why don't they allow Ukraines plead to join the block if it's simple like u think Even Americans are afraid of getting dragged directly into the conflict Just sit and wait to see when Russia will bow down to NATO and give the conquered regions 😂😂 Russia won't bow down to NATO until it achieves her goal of the S O
@@XobaxieAbdxalaam-ij9jr Simply cause Ukraine isnt a NATO member, and unlike what Russia is trying to portray, NATO isnt an aggressor and is trying not to escalate the conflict, but give it time, Russia keeps escalating, keeps up with treats of nuclear war and you will see NATO troops in Ukraine and than the really whining and crying from Russia will start> @terminatotr_lotta538 belief it or not but there are actually 7, 1 of France, 1 of Turkey, 2 of UK and 3 of Italy, add the USA and it will be an other 16 on top of it. But this vid only looks at NATO with out the USA numbers. Whole point being that NATO even with out the USA in many ways out numbers and certainly out performs Russia, the USA alone does this 2, so For all its big talk, if NATO where to really get serios with Russia than Russia can only loss. And yes Nuclear escalation is also a loss for Russia.
this is misleading or misinformation,youre using russian numbers before the ukraine war and as of now russia doesnt have half of what is shown in this video......be it for entertainbment or not it should be closer to accuriate than throwing up almost 3 yr old numbers that dont exist today
My sources are listed in the description. Before the war Russia had a lot more of equipment. Russia vs Ukraine 2022 th-cam.com/video/AiRtbqWoP7g/w-d-xo.html
60+ year olds, amputtes, alcoholics, drug addicts, medically unfit like asthmatics, spina bifida, shall I go on? All fine specimens of #ruzzianTerroristState orcmanity I'm sure. _"What's wrong with the orcpower?"_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Russia has lost a couple of ten thousand soldiers, as well as multiple tanks, but Ukraine has lost much more. In terms of men, vehicles, and territory.
I dont think so.... they only blabla... they dont know the tech today now... its to complicated...theyre german scientists are fade away long time ago. Europe have nukes that hits and dont explode at the start.
Those number are pré-war? Because russian go on chinese golf car and T50 atm insted of BMP and T80. + the air carier no longer in service. The SU57 and the armata don't work. A lot of nucléar warhead din't be updated since 1980 (so probably obsolet at this point). Thx to Ukraine Russia in a minor military power now.
Have you ever considered the idea that Russia is holding back for a possible conflict with NATO? That the whole stint in Ukraine is to have them blooded and spent?
Hi, my sources are listed in the description. If comes to the war in Ukraine, Russian losses are being deducted. To do that, I've used Oryx and Warspotting.
@@MILITARY-TUBE None related. Oryx is known by undercounting russian losses by a great number. More reliable are the satellite photos showing how drained are russian reserves, even if we add the new produced weaponry - bu regarding armored vehicles, MBT, IFV, APC, they're loosing more everyday than they can produce - in due ratio, of course (production/losses per month, quarter, semester...). Not even speaking how russia could have lost 4% of his total male demographics. Let's see who can keep up with productive industry, that that feeds economy with income, and war economy simultaneous
The Turkish army is the most war-ready army in NATO after the US. The Turks have been fighting an unconventional war against the PKK in the eastern provinces since 1990 and have emerged victorious. Additionally, they have carried out the Euphrates Shield and Olive Branch operations. Imagine an army that has been fighting continuously for 35 years.
Polen is at the Moment the biggest threat for russia.. Polen is a Powerhouse finnish, norway and swe too badass... Russian lost already the Most of His Military Personal and Equipment
@@SoulDamage90 With all due respect to Poland, but do you really believe that Poland, Sweden, Finland or Norway has a stronger army than France, the UK or Germany? Poland has ordered a lot of military equipment, but it will take years until everything is there.
Easy victory for the US. Not a real military power in Latin America, but keeping the full control of a so huge territory and population it would be (almost) impossible.
Russia controls around ~20% of territory of the Ukraine (not counting Crimea), Ukraine controls 0% of Russia. Biggest Ukrainian cities are under constant fire of Russian forces, their logistic, infrastructure and energy facilities are in crisis moments, they are forced to kidnap they own - young people to fight in meat grinder, because there are no more "heroes" like 1 year ago. And u still saying Ukraine is winning?! I think I don't even want to know how your logic works man, because there has to be smth wrong.
@@neutrino5266Россия не может победить Украину только из-за помощи НАТО. Но даже так Россия сейчас постепенно берёт небольшие территории и движется вперёд. И это без масштабной мобилизации в отличие от Украины. Если Россия будет сражаться с «НАТО без США», то ситуация будет та же: НАТО будет очень медленно двигаться, но отвоевать территории Украины не получится. Для полной победы нужно огромное преимущество, которого у НАТО нет
@@AaronC123-q9t you can get all the evidence you want also on nato-ukranian equipment. Less on youtube because it demonetize you if you share videos of ukraninas dying, well, enjoy the western freedom bot
I think you watch too many BBC or CCN articles. Open Reddit, Twitter or Telegram and then open your eyes. The Russian army is now 30% larger than before February 23, 2022, and is better armed and trained. Old generals with operational brains from the Cold War replaced by new ones who understand today's martial arts, etc. The West underestimated Russia's industrial power and (NATO) found this out when it failed to cope with ammunition for Ukraine, and in the meantime Russia could produce up to 4 million pieces of artillery ammunition per year. For comparison, the West - USA and Ukraine's European allies are able to produce about 1.2 million pieces of artillery ammunition per year.
Because most European countries are rather small with a fairly low population and each on their own has limited resouces. We prefer it that way in Europe. Most of the time each tend to their own house and then we call on our neighbours when something big needs to be done.
Solo alemania y francia suoeran en poblacion a rusia... sumale italia inglaterra españa portugal polonia.... y aun asi alemania y francia por si sola nonpodrian con rusia@@tessjuel
I hope that US doesnt withdraw from Nato, but if they do Europe will be doing good anyway. 5000 nukes or 500 doesnt matter. Without allies the US are in trouble, thats for sure.
The European NATO countries combined totally outgun Russia, that's for sure; and Russia is the only even remotely realistic military threat to Europe. This is even before we consider that Russia can only deploy a fairly small part of its military in a hypothetical (I hope) war in Europe. It also has to watch it back in case some of its Asian neighbors decides to take advantage of the situation. There are a few problems that don't show up in these statistics though. One is that we can't be absolutely sure all the European nations will stand together. There are two in particular that are only 99% trusted and one of them happens to have one of the largest military forces in Europe. Also, Russia is already fighting a "hybrid war" in Europe, spending quite a lot of time and money undermining European governments and they've had some success. They even managed to get one of their useful idiots installed as the British Prime Minister for a while. The biggest problem the European NATO countries face though, is that they don't really have enough ammunition in store for a prolonged war. Even the most advanced weapon systems are useless if they don't have anything that goes boom to throw at the enemy. They are working on it but it'll take a few years to get the production capacity up to the level it should be.
@@tessjuel The European countries that stand a chance are those with Nukes. Honestly most European countries are too reliant on the US for Military and I hate it.
@@TheoVadif you want to lack behind in every other branch like russia you firstly spend exponential growth killing percentages on military and do not exploit allied military support
@@tvsoul5823 I don't think that's the case though because Europe is a rich continent, if they want to build a strong army, they can without boots on ground.
Well after the Intro .. Yes for sure USA has paid a big Military bill ... Trump is right there .. can we please now define what exactly means " got little in return ? "
@@ClaudiuYyy-sq8nxв политике всё может быть) сегодня турция в нато а завтра за Россию, а через день вообще против всех. В политике дружат с теми с кем это выгодно)
@@ClaudiuYyy-sq8nx Greece is buying F-35, where in the world you get those non-senses of being closer to russia? just got back your net connection after a absent period of some years? Plus Greece use French Rafale and bough more a couple of 2022 (still to deliver)... I really don't understand where you got that blasfemic idea...
Yeah it's pretty crazy, my parents went to Ireland a few years back, they told a shop owner that they only drove 2 hours that morning to go see a few castles, the guy was flabbergasted 😂 Apparently 2 hours driving for Europeans is like 10 hours to Americans.
@@bjorndebar8361 That's not how logic works... Canada is the second largest country in the world with 10 million km2, number 1 has 17 million km2. Therefore, 30 European countries is not even 70% as big as Canada.... but I'd like to hear how your brain managed to interpret "He's never been to Europe" from a statement about the size of Canada? Lol That must have took some serious "mental gymnastics"
@@ec6052 I thought it was about the USA, my mistake. The USA is 2500km from east to west coast, Europe is 3800km from north to south. But Canada is much bigger, that's true.
@@UrHughAnus who gonna provide DPRK moden combat training in a realistic environment with captured nato weapons. ? Im sure 50-100k DPRK elite guards will sign this contract..and find them self in the donbass in a year.
@@UrHughAnus Korea is a cold place the black sea will like paradise to them. They are allied with DPR and LPR I feel they will fulfil this and assist plus where better to learn then on the battlefield.
Doesn't make much sense. BRICS is not a military alliance and some members are closer to the west than to other BRICS countries in terms of military and economic cooperation.
Brasil is getting closer to NATO, wanting to sell them Embraer KC-390 Transport/refuel Jets and propeller light attack planes like the A29 Super Tucano N (stands for NATO, reason those are being built in Portugal... guess why) for CAS and Reconnaissance, India just dropped the bid for Russian planes and bought French Rafale, SIG 716 for special and frontier units instead of AK's, and much more small weapons from western countries, so not even as a commercial alliance things are going great, also with India buying Russian Oil underpriced and China wanting to pay for russian gas the same as russians pay; South Africa left the conversation, Russia is a mess, Iran continues the trend of losing new ships, with another one capsized inside wet docks!!!! There you have the mighty BRICS
Лично мне непонятно почему Archer считается как 5 звездочный. Длиннющая махина у которой ствол ещё поднимать надо. Также она колёсная, а значит проходимость вычёркиваем.
@@hakuto6814 У той же Германии тоже есть много свободный полей. Но зачем им этим Archer захватывать друг друга в Европе , если основная цель --> Россия покрытая болотами? Если честно Советский Союз только за счёт болот и морозов пережил 1941-1942 годы.
@@hakuto6814 Но зачем им этим Archer захватывать друг друга в Европе , если основная цель --> Россия покрытая болотами? Если честно Советский Союз только за счёт болот и морозов пережил 1941-1942 годы.
@@7321cristian Manco c'è bisogno di pareggiare i conti. Nel caso dei casi l'UE (anche togliendo Ungheria e Slovacchia) + UK son più che capaci di fronteggiare la Russia e compagni in un conflitto convenzionale, politica e determinazione permettendo.
@@7321cristian Chiaro. Io intendevo UE + UK, in pratica l'Europa, senza contare su alcun paese NATO extra-europeo. L'unico motivo per il quale siamo messi "male" (così per dire) è il fatto che la difesa è nettamente scesa nelle nostre priorità data l'alleanza con gli USA e la fine della guerra fredda. Abbiamo tutto quel che serve, nel caso dei casi. Come detto, politica permettendo.
Taking account that Erdogan is a friend of Putin we don't put Turkiye as an allied, just another Xi who play poker with NATO. I hope that situation will change.
How did it exactly show and what? What about russia in ukraine its alot more recent and russias main strategy atm is burn ukrainian ammunition with conscripts If you are to fight nato russia would get folded Ukraine with some nato weapons has been destroying russia
@@nicojokelin5547 I guess people in Russia didn't hear anything about own destruction yet? We see economicall growth and we see how all predictions about Russia was false. In same time they grow stronger their alliance. G7 is 28% of world economy and BRICS achieved 35% I think westerners didn't expect that kind of destruction 😂 54 countries involved in war. NATO attacked illegally and used all they can but couldn't harm Serbian army. Then they start bombing with depleted uranium, attacking bridges, buses, trains, TV, hospitals, residential areas with cluster bombs, electrical power infrastructure, gas stations...killing civilians, kids in their homes while attacking independent UN country, violating country UN borders and violating UN charters... It showed how NATO is bunch of cowards, criminals and how powerless they are. Serbia is much smaller country than Ukraine (7× smaller) and had much less weapons, no sophisticated weapons at all. No help from any side. NATO also is bigger and richer than Russia but showed more criminal and violent but also as bigger cowards and incompetent, weak against much weaker opponent than Ukraine...weaker on papers, statistics...now compare those two. It was recently, 25 years ago and it still lasts with one shape of NATO occupation inside of Serbian UN borders. World is changing. NATO must be shut down and we have plans, buying weapons, train hard to attack NATO in one moment. Hope it will fall apart before it but if not...we will have to do it. If you ask people here, many of us want to attack NATO right now, not to wait any more agreements westerners will not respect those documents anyway.
@@bgdabg6769Residents of the border areas with Ukraine live not very well, they are bombed every day and are not interested in any kind of economy. I myself live in a border area and recently near my place of residence several Ukrainian missiles got to the communication center. By the way, about the economy, what we hear on TV is all a lie, only those who are in the capital live well.
@@KNMRoaldAmundsen Did you check the number of victims on Serbian side and all together of those against. It's like 3× more. NATO with allies couldn't take anything on ground. Agreement that stopped the war say that Kosovo is Serbia, UN charter that come out of it say that Kosovo is Serbia. NATO achievements are... Nothing except killing civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure, hospitals, bridges, media, train, bus, random families houses, electric energy....
NATO needs USA for providing nuclear detergent. The alternative would be for European countries to build their own nuclear weapons and *nobody* wants that to happen. And of course, although the European NATO countries should be able to repell a Russian invasion on their own, more power will make it quicker and less costly. And if you think USA doesn't need NATO, so far it is the only country that has asked for help from the other members in an actual armed conflict. With that being said, there is no need for USA to spend much resources on NATO in peacetime and it doesn't spend much either. There are only about 70,000-90,000 US troops stationed in Europe, including the units that operate in the Middle East from European bases, and even that may be a bit more than necessary. What matters, is the detergent it can provide and the reserves it can send if a war breaks out.
You do realise the us needs Europe and her allies to buy weapons or the us economy would crash. It's better for the us the way it is if Europe and uk started producing their own military gear it would fuck the us.
Hi, my sources are listed in the description. If comes to the war in Ukraine, Russian losses are being deducted. To do that, I've used Oryx and Warspotting.
@cjjk9142 The 6000 comes from the Military Balance 2024 and was subtracted by the losses. Regarding the tanks in reserve, so in April, they had around 3150. According to Covert Cabal's video which was released yesterday (on July 6th,2024), this number dropped to around 2500 usable tanks. I guess that depends on who's counting. bulgarianmilitary.com/2024/04/13/4550-russian-tanks-await-upgrade-by-2026-ukrainian-analysts/ th-cam.com/video/xWCEZUQtUwE/w-d-xo.html
Console yourself with your stories about the defeat of the USSR in Afghanistan, about the invincible Ukraine, about the military might of NATO, etc.But you are modestly silent about the brilliant victories in Georgia in 2008, in Syria in 2015, in Afghanistan in 2021, and most importantly, not a word about Vietnam.The main thing is that they could not defeat Ukraine!"But never mind, you will still have a chance to win, tough warriors, show how to fight and win.But only you will have to do it yourself, and not sacrifice the Ukrainians.
Russia vs. +32 countries in Ukraine and still winning. The western people are a joke i wonder what will do all those USA fan boys when the capitulation/defeat comes.
@@ilkeribrahim6541 If the entire NATO with the entire west and all the help with a million NATO soldiers cannot defeat Russia, then Russia is Godzilla!
@@slobodanstojanovic5521 NATO isn't trying to defeat Russia . Ukraine is trying to defeat Russia ,while NATO is helping them to fight back. NATO it not even fighting Russia . Russia can't even defeat Ukraine with just equipment that NATO provided them lol.
Оркостан просив допомоги в ОДКБ але ОДКБ сказав це ваші проблеми, з якого дива тим країнам допомагати втарим в міре? Там вже деякі планують покинути ОДКБ;)
@@МаксиНещеретIf my grandfather had had wheels he would have been a bike. And what you say is false because NATO help came after months the war had started, and still Russians couldn't end the war.
Ахыхвхвхаххахвхвхвх 600к ванек с калашматами и в тапках на фронте забирают территории у страны в 40 миллионов населения напичканной натовским оружием и с 1 местом по силе в Европе. По моему это позор для Украины)))
raw numbers doesn't mean that much. It counts how fast this vehicles can be "battle ready". Germany admitted last year that the Kriegsmarine has 3 operational subs...
@@Maddog-xc2zv i think you are quite misinformed. Industry? That doesnt mean military strenght. Reihnmetall produces the most to fullfill exports and sales. Not for the german army. And one year is not much. Not even close to what germany needs to build an army that can be called an army. Historically germany produces high quality armaments but the output is the issue. Thats why te us and Russia are much closer on how to fight and produce than the us and germany
If NATO is such a strong organization, then why haven't they entered Ukraine yet? But because Ukraine has already been divided. The left side of the Dnieper plus the Odessa region will remain with Russia, the rest of Ukraine with Poland. It's a matter of time. And by the way, the professional army is not the one that constantly trains, but the one that fights. There are two professional armies in the world today - the Russian and the Ukrainian.
BMP-1s and all of its variants like BMP-1AMs and ex-Georgian BMP-1Us are counted in. Currently Russia has 12x BMP-1Us, and around 700x BMP-1/-1AM in active service. Furthermore they have around 1,300 BMP-1s in reserve. If comes to the M113s so they are actively used by for example Greece, and Portugal.
@@MILITARY-TUBE Portugal does not use M113 unless as mobile mortars. We do have some, but on the frontlines we use our Pandur II and not the M113 of which many went to Ukraine as military aid, as we're phasing them out completely. Also SCAR L STD are used in the army only (including tier 2 commandos and paratroopers), Navy still uses the HK-G3, many with spuhr kits and aim point devices like the army FN SCAR L (which are complement with troops with SCAR H STD also, but in smaller numbers). Air force land component uses HK G36 while tier 2 units use CZ BREN 2 (phasing out the G-36) and JSOCs use HK-416 complemented with HK-417.
Portugal has donated 45 out of its 190 M113 to Ukraine. Furthermore, they have added to that 2 out of 49 M577. If it comes to mortars so Portugal has: 2x M125A1; 10x M125A2 ; 3x M106A1; 15x M106A2. There are also some in the "tank destroyer" variant, mainly: 17x M113 with TOW, and 4x M901 with TOW. If it comes to the SCAR, when choosing the primary battle rifle I've decided to use the "Army" as an example, because it's the best indicator and it's the biggest out of all branches. The Air Force and Navy (with the exception of the Marines or for example AGRUMERG) do not need cutting-edge rifles, so in many countries, they are using everything that the army has spare. It's true if it comes to Portugal and for example Poland. Despite that we have assault rifles, such as FB MSBS Grot or Beryl, when I was training with the Navy in 2021 I was armed with an AKMS :)
@@MILITARY-TUBE Still they don't use them as said. They're being phased out and are seen as death traps. they're only, with few exception I mentioned, as death traps and are not used in front lines, for that we use the Pandur II 8x8, platform we are also investing in to obtain more units. At least do have a practical knowledge of what you're conveying, as excel spreadsheets anyone can read and make but they lack qualitative information - as you also do as your statements are an example.
What's your idea for the next comparison?
Australia versus Indonesia
Serbia VS Croatia
That comparison means nothing, just as the list of armies of the world means nothing at all, nor does it show how strong someone is. The entire NATO must not attack one North Korea, which is 30 in the world, or one Iran? Those comparisons are ridiculous!
Greece vs Bulgaria
EU vs usa
We have seen Russian Forces and Equipment in Ukraine. Say no more.
I very much doubt that NATO could take out Ukraine if it were supplied by Russia
Same with NATO Trained Ukrainians and Western equipment.
@@TheoVad the russians rolled out their best hardware, NATO sent it old hardware that is past upgrade worthy so no comparison.
@@RobertMarshall-d2nimagine believing western news...And more than 30% of the land are occupied by Russian now...Ur clown zelensky need to go to the front tier because they ran out of innocent men
@@RobertMarshall-d2n only in your dreams,russia mostly using cold war weapons and privet military groups and not the main troops
Ohh hey. You forgot who got the most golf carts. Russia got a ton of those chinese golf carts for troop transportation 😂
Chinese here you go, bro, some golf carts you’re welcome😂
🤣
Ukraine is a one giant golf field😂
but they are still winning so doesn't that make NATO pathetic?!
@@puzzled012 how so? Nato is not currently involved in the conflict, they have trained Ukrainian soldiers and given them equipment but have not sent troops or military personal/ large amounts of equipment
"European NATO" is not unarmed.
Serbia is not in NATO@@emanuelefilosa788
@@emanuelefilosa788 Are you drunk ??
Just to put this out on the table: what are you writing? Learn how to spell!!
For your first text: NO! Most of the armies in Nato countries are NOT in Ukraine fighting Russia, all foreign fighters are volunteers - if any nato country’s actual military gets involved we’d all been nuked to bits by the Russians by now. Ukraine stood for a long time on its own before getting support(equipment only-excluding volunteers) by NATO countries.
Thi armamento isn’t even a word in the English dictionary nor is it a term so stop talking BS!!
Romania ranked higher in military power before the ukr-russo war, of course only theoretically as we’ve seen the past two years.
Only reason Ukraine is no. 18 today is because almost all men over 18 are volunteering in the Ukrainian army which makes the ukr. Military active fighters 900 thousand with 1,3 million reserve.
There are 32 countries in Nato, losing America doesn’t make nato unarmed! There are still elite military fighting forces like France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Not to mention how both Finland and Sweden just joined.
If even USA left NATO then thereafter declared war on NATO they wouldn’t even come close!! America is overrated as a country in military power, economics and quality. America may be leading in military research but closely followed by rivals such as China. Germany is also very high on the list on Military Research. Hell Germany published the Panther KF51 some few months ago, directly competing the American m1 abrams family.
You need to stop watching whatever kind of brainwashing “America is the most technologically advanced country” and “America is better than everyone else if it weren’t for the USA the rest of the world would’ve been dead” type brainwashing. America isn’t even top three most technologically developed countries with Japan in first place closely followed by South Korea.
Don't even bother. This guy is an idiot and makes videos for idiots like himself. Comparing NATO without USA to Russia is like comparing ODKB(CSTO) without Russia to US Army. Just a very low IQ way to flatter ego of many pro-russian bots that follow his channel.
"The rest of NATO"
Poland and France are serious. Turkey is NATO in name only.
The rest of Europe is a speed bump.
@@emanuelefilosa788 bro is making stuff up
I hear russia is working on a new design of electric armoured scooter.
😂😂
they took baby carriages and use them as a stand for weapons systems….
Russia has had the equivalent of 7-8 Vietnams worth of casualties in 2 years
Because ukranie is a real war.
Zenlenkeyy : We killed 1000 billion Tanks and Soilders 😭 please believe me 😭
Western media : yea it's true 😭🤡
@@edwarren804 Given to the fact that Russia's 2 week long invasion turned into a 2 and a half year long endeavor right now, coupled with the endless videos of drone footage and on-ground recordings of tanks and soldiers getting taken out, yeah I'd say it's pretty true
@@user-tj1vg4zn5p
The Iraqi army was considerably more than Ukraine, Iraq was using Russian equipment to their bad luck.
Fighting Ukraine in comparison to the 4th largest army in the world, Russia is found lacking.
@@terrypennington2519 give to the fact
Russia and Ukraine both Uses Russian Wepons
Even Ukranie Uses Russian Wepons too and not everything is truth what you seen because this is war.
Even NATO without the US will still kick Russia’s ass
31 vs 1
No problem we have France and UK in nato
TrueMilitary sounds like a cooler name and it matches your profile pic. Also. Sus color scheme big dog. By the way, good music and I love how the slides are done.
The big question is: if russia can't defeat Ukraine, how can defeat NATO with/without USA?
Because it an indirect war against nATO
And USA couldn't defeat Vietnam who are just bunch of Farmers
@@Cadet528 Well, URSS lost against Afghanistan and lost the cold war, russia lost the first chechen war... what is your point???
@@g.l.u.3039
That question is for him not me
He said because Russia can't defeat Ukraine so they can't defeat NATO
My point is that he is using the wrong criteria to judge the outcome of war
@@g.l.u.3039dude ur uneducated whole nato and USA already backed Ukraine they can't beat Russia even unitedly 😂
Russia will fight wearing flip-flops and shovels
И с ушанкой и балалайкой
Если Россия воюет шлепанцами и лопатами, то почему украина не побеждает?
@@GOYDA-GOOL Еще и территории теряет) наверное просто лопатами границы рисуем 😁
😂
Russia has no chance against any major NATO member. Russia has the second strongest army in the Ukraine😂😂😂
Russia just kicked out Fr@nce in Africa🤣
If Ukraine is number one and Russia second than good luck NATO.
@@kubissk7158NATO isn’t in Ukraine, 🛎️🔚
It’s hilarious how you completely suck up our western media which is essentially propaganda. It’s a tool used by everyone to make their citizens believe all is fine. Ukraine is getting pasted to the walls. 40-50% of their fighting aged men are either dead or wounded. Why do you think so many Ukrainian men are now fleeing Ukraine?? Russia still has millions and millions of fighting aged citizens they can call upon. Has History taught you ANYTHING about the way Russia and the former Soviet Union fight their wars? In its entire military existence in the 20th and 21st century, the Russians have only ever lost a single conflict, a conflict that NATO member states themselves lost also and that is in Afghanistan.
Bobo spotted 😂😂😂
Interesting video idea. However, the Russian Army equipment numbers aren't taking the Russian war losses in account. In some of those categories the Russian Army would be lucky to have half of those numbers in workable condition. These types of videos base their figures on the Military Balance numbers. The Military Balance figures ignore their wartime losses. The Military Balance also ignore equipment that worn out from age.
Hi, except using the Military Balance I'm keeping up with war losses with the help of websites such as Oryx and Warspotting. I'm also tracking Russian deliveries of a new equipment.
If comes to the accuracy of the Military Balance so it's the most accurate when it's released. Let's be honest that currently except countries, which have ongoing war like Russia and Ukraine keeping up with deliveries of new equipment is easy.
I've also made Russia vs Ukraine in 2022, and back then Russia had a lot more of equipment.
th-cam.com/video/AiRtbqWoP7g/w-d-xo.html
@@MILITARY-TUBE Oryx consistently undercounds Russian equipment compared Andrew Perputa's numbers. Covert Cabal keeps tracks of Russian tanks +artillery pieces+armored vehicles in storage. Your numbers and Covert Cabal's numbers aren't close. The Russian Army has about 3000 armor vehicles such as BMPs+BTRs+APCs left not counting more useless armor vehicles. 28000 where did that number come from? The Russians are losing about 5 tanks + 10 BMPs, BTRs, APCs combined together per day according Andrew's numbers. The Russian Army reserves numbers that you quoted are mainly guys who have done their required service years ago. Paper organization. How much of the Russian equipment is worn out garbage? If your numbers were somewhat accurate the Russian Army would have destroyed the Ukrainian Army long ago.
Andrew Perputa does the same what Oryx, and Warspotting means he recognizes vehicles from videos and photos found on the X, and the Telegram. If comes to the actual losses, they are bigger than those confirmed on Oryx, Warspoting, and Andrew Perputa's materials, because not everything can be documented on video or photo.
Russia has 3 thousand BMPs, BTRs, and APCs but in reserve. Publications like The Military Balance and Covert Cabals videos prove that. However, the recent Kings of General video suggests that Russia currently has no BTRs in reserve.
th-cam.com/video/g8QSdMB-isc/w-d-xo.html
Covert Cabal shows the number of equipment left in storage/reserve not overall, which is used by the actual soldiers on the frontline, and by the units stationed in Russia.
In simple words, Russia does not withdraw all of its vehicles from Ukraine and puts them in line for a nice satellite photo.
Also, no one knows how big percentage of the equipment in the storage is worn out. However the equipment in storage is mostly used to a small extent, and gets broken by the environmental processes of the areas, in which it's stored, it is rain, snow, and low temperatures. Keep in mind that the vehicles shown in Covert Cabal's videos have been stored there since the times of the Soviet Union.
The same goes for the readiness of the equipment used by active Russian units. No one knows the percentage of ready-to-used equipment. However in this case the vehicles get worn out mainly because of the usage and enemy actions, not environmental processes.
28 thousand is the overall number of armored vehicles such as BMPs, BMDs, BRMs, BTRs, GAZ Tigrs, IVECO LMVs, BMP-Ts, BRDMs, MT-LBs, Typhoon-Ks, Z-STS Akhmats, GAZ-3937 Vodniks, support vehicles, like BREM, IMR/-2/3 etc. The number, which is below is the number in reserve, in this case, 3900. It came from the Military Balance 2024 and was updated from external links, like Oryx, Warspotting, news from Army Recognition, United24, Wikipedia, Defence24, videos made by Covert Cabal, Kings and Generals, etc.
If comes to the Russian "success" in Ukraine so it's not all about the number of equipment, because currently Ukraine has enough resources to defend itself. Enough is to check the list of equipment delivered to Ukraine on Wikipedia to realize that it could arm the whole Europe. It's more about things like tactics, surveillance, and the quality of leadership. The funny thing is that Russia does not have even a numerical advantage in Ukraine. Russia has overall around 700 thousand soldiers in Ukraine involved in the operations on all fronts versus 880 thousand Ukrainian ones.
Russia has a lot more than 3 thousand BMPs, BTRs, and other APCs. For example, experts estimate that only in the Southern part of Ukraine Russia uses around 3 thousand tanks, 7 thousand infantry fighting vehicles (this number doesn't take into account vehicles like MRAPs, BTRs except BTR-80A and BTR-82A, and support vehicles), 5 thousand various artillery pieces, 12 hundred MLRS systems, 300 helicopters, and 300 aircraft.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_aid_to_Ukraine_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War#
defence24.pl/wojna-na-ukrainie-raport-specjalny-defence24/zelenski-ujawnia-liczbe-zolnierzy-mamy-880-tysiecy
www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/06/15/putin-says-almost-700k-russian-troops-fighting-in-ukraine-a85419
th-cam.com/video/gk7D_TliAuE/w-d-xo.html
Если учитывать то что Мы с НАТО воюем то информация примерно нормальная Ты мне скажешь почему Русские с НАТО воюют? А тебя не смущает то что НАТО технику посылает на Украину!? Патроны? И ТД.!? Тебя это вообще не смущает? Да!?
@@МаксимНещерет-б6чIf Nato were truly at war with Russia, then you'd be fighting inside of Russia instead of Ukraine. The US is sending ammo that is ending its viable usage status, meaning it's at the point where it's beginning to become a liability. Let's say a mortar shell has a dud rate of 1 in 1,000 for its first 5 years, then from 5 to 7 years its 5 in 1,000, that's beyond the acceptable rate for the US. The US will either use them up in training exercises or just give them away when they hit the 5 year. (depending on the variation or type). Iran, North Korea, China have all been supplying Russia with weapons since the early days, Russia has also used its territories to wage war against Ukraine. It's even rumored that North Korea has been sending actual troops now, which is more than any Nato country has done.
can you do nato without usa vs russia+china+india+north korea+Iran
NATO are stronger, than this countries
Okay, but on the side NATO also South Korea, Japan, Israel, Ukraine and Australia
Why without USA? USA in NATO too
1. Europe is looking pretty just from the mandatory service numbers, that is, the lack of them, with only 9 out of 31 countries having it, which means 22 countries have volunteer armed forces, which means they are not conscripts, which means they are more professional, which means better trained and motivated, which translates to the battlefield (Russia's conscripts would be crushed, no matter how many are on the field).
2. In fact, they are looking good across the board, as in, 'Go deal with the other shit Dictatorships around the world, we have the shit dictatorship of Russia covered, America."
3. I did not see motorcycles, golf carts, and scooters in the lists. Russia is definitely ahead in those categories.
4. Russia has a drone advantage, but that is easily made up by Europe's overwhelming industrial capacity, and by the time of any conflict, drones may be obsolete.
5. I had to turn the music way down.
That was a very interesting matchup...forgot to mention part of the equipment and personnel may be depleted on the russia side if it were from today's numbers.....also dont forget that Some Nato Members have said they will be raising their defense budget so that means more soldiers and weapons being added to its force and dont forget that those NATO countries are actually on the east as well so it would be a faster delivery to battle if it were done around the borders....so crazy that so many smaller countries can have a very tough army if needed 😊 i dont get why some are bent over hating Russia or US/NATO, dont forget we're all human and the reason why theres a fight is because the big guys in power chose it. Poor men dying for rich men's ego.
Nato got much modern war Equipment, Special forces ... Modern warfare.. so russia CANt mess Up with Nato
It already does you little idiot
Much? Like if all country produces gets destroyed in Ukraine that is not really much, for example france literally have no shells since it was transferred to Ukraine. Not to mention that mobilizing all of NATO members is literally impossible it will be logistic hell and i really doubt how much NATO members will join war if it happens
It's 33 vs 1, do we really need to talk about who's gonna win? Russia is making a great success by winning in Ukraine
🤡
@@ZOV_kakashkeVirusmacedonia, luxembourg Montenegro......
THX for the effort. You got my like. Some things are not acurate... like the russian carier Kuziencow. It burned down and will be scrapped. The same is with rusian hevy machinery & planes, not operational anymore :). There are alsow some major purchasing going on in Europe since the the russian invasion... so we will have to wait until the turmoil is over.
Мы в год только полностью новых танков делаем от 100-150. При этом ремонтируем около 500 единиц техники со складов.(и это данные на прошлый год). Напомни сколько новых, не модернизированных танков делается в НАТО. Разве что леопарды по 10-20 штук в год и все. Ну и если наша армия такая слабая то почему бы вам не присоединиться и добить нас вместе с "могущественной" украиной? А, наверное вы вспомнили сколько у нас ядерного оружия. Ну так сидите и молчите.
Russia has not lost even 15% of its military power. And creating new weapons is a matter of technology and time, which Russia has plenty of).
@@electromagnet249 😆We all "belive" 😉😉you . Because we don't have access to ORYX or other genuine information source... But Ukraine lost all the "biolabs" and the "NATO battle moscitos & atack goose" 😉😉
Rusian "technology" 🤣
@@PrzemysawNizioek Your words are as worthless as the Ukrainian attacks. Do you even understand what you wrote?
Russia needs to rely on donations from North Korea.
Люди верят, что Россия использует полную мощность своей армии на Украине)) Будь это так, потери мирных граждан были бы в 1000 раз больше, а да, в России же животные, им похуй на людей, это не цивилизованный запад
The only way that a NATO V Russia conflict could happen is if Russia decided to invade a NATO member, NATO has no intention of invading Russia, if it happened not only would the Russians be facing NATO military forces they would also have to contend with local resistance fighters behind their lines, and the Russians themselves proved back in W.W.II that those fighters can tie up a lot of resources needed on the front line.
The problem is that Russia does not only border NATO. China also has some unresolved territorial issues with Russia, such as "unequal treaties", but Russia has not returned the occupied territories. Russia cannot use all its potential against NATO, it must leave security on other "fronts". we forget that NATO also borders Russia in the Arctic Ocean. While NATO can focus on frontline operations, Russia must secure its strategic Arctic hinterland. In addition, we must take into account that the presented data is not up-to-date. Russia is losing more equipment in Ukraine than it can produce. The war in Ukraine also perfectly showed how technically backward Russian military equipment is. It no longer even resembles the frontline operations of World War II, but the trench fighting of the fronts of World War I. Even the design of combat vehicles has regressed and they are starting to resemble the first tanks (although to me they look more like medieval battering rams for ramming the gates of fortresses). Russians improvise at every step. Their entire army is makeshift. Just 3 years ago they were the second strongest army in the world, today they are a laughing stock and the second strongest army in Ukraine. I'm very curious about which Russian tank's crew will posthumously receive the award for the tank's farthest or highest flying turret.
Что ты несёшь?))) Какие споры с Китаем?)) Какая устаревшая армия? Её уже модернизировали после 2022, и сейчас это хорошо видно. Про то, что украина вторая армия мира я вообще молчу. Ты откуда информацию берёшь?
@@Denis_Valeev.Насчëт Китая я бы согласился, а вот то что он т-14 считает "танком второй мировой" это уже ппц
@@Denis_Valeev.И даже видео автора не слишком верно, ни за что не поверю что у НАТО 5 авианосцев, у них столько наверное на боевом дежурстве
And our problem is that we can not understand the Russia Ukraine conflict
U claim Russian military is under performing in Ukraine not considering the billions of military aid provided by NATO for Ukraine
And if West thinks Russia is week why don't they just enter directly and save Ukraine
Why don't they allow Ukraines plead to join the block if it's simple like u think
Even Americans are afraid of getting dragged directly into the conflict
Just sit and wait to see when Russia will bow down to NATO and give the conquered regions 😂😂
Russia won't bow down to NATO until it achieves her goal of the S O
@@XobaxieAbdxalaam-ij9jr Simply cause Ukraine isnt a NATO member, and unlike what Russia is trying to portray, NATO isnt an aggressor and is trying not to escalate the conflict, but give it time, Russia keeps escalating, keeps up with treats of nuclear war and you will see NATO troops in Ukraine and than the really whining and crying from Russia will start>
@terminatotr_lotta538 belief it or not but there are actually 7, 1 of France, 1 of Turkey, 2 of UK and 3 of Italy, add the USA and it will be an other 16 on top of it. But this vid only looks at NATO with out the USA numbers. Whole point being that NATO even with out the USA in many ways out numbers and certainly out performs Russia, the USA alone does this 2, so For all its big talk, if NATO where to really get serios with Russia than Russia can only loss. And yes Nuclear escalation is also a loss for Russia.
Now do NATO without USA and uk vs Russia and china
Bro really said that Challenger 3 is better than T-90M ☠️
this is misleading or misinformation,youre using russian numbers before the ukraine war and as of now russia doesnt have half of what is shown in this video......be it for entertainbment or not it should be closer to accuriate than throwing up almost 3 yr old numbers that dont exist today
My sources are listed in the description. Before the war Russia had a lot more of equipment.
Russia vs Ukraine 2022
th-cam.com/video/AiRtbqWoP7g/w-d-xo.html
@@MILITARY-TUBE yeah, and man power too... lol
@@Maddog-xc2zv What's wrong with the manpower?
60+ year olds, amputtes, alcoholics, drug addicts, medically unfit like asthmatics, spina bifida, shall I go on? All fine specimens of #ruzzianTerroristState orcmanity I'm sure.
_"What's wrong with the orcpower?"_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Russia has lost a couple of ten thousand soldiers, as well as multiple tanks, but Ukraine has lost much more. In terms of men, vehicles, and territory.
Its pretty balanced. NATO has more men but Russia has more nuclear rockets.
I dont think so.... they only blabla... they dont know the tech today now... its to complicated...theyre german scientists are fade away long time ago. Europe have nukes that hits and dont explode at the start.
The ruzzians call their newest submarine-type "Lada"? Self-confident!
Those number are pré-war? Because russian go on chinese golf car and T50 atm insted of BMP and T80. + the air carier no longer in service. The SU57 and the armata don't work. A lot of nucléar warhead din't be updated since 1980 (so probably obsolet at this point). Thx to Ukraine Russia in a minor military power now.
Have you ever considered the idea that Russia is holding back for a possible conflict with NATO? That the whole stint in Ukraine is to have them blooded and spent?
Hello comedian how are you 💀
@alexandernaydenov7539 bro how did this guy make in so long 😭
@@ArthurMorgantherealone who ?
@@alexandernaydenov7539 the guy who commented.
I'm sure US defence spending wouldn't decrease by one cent if Trump pulled the US out of NATO
Is Russia’s numbers before or after their catastrophy in Ukraine? Great video…
Hi, my sources are listed in the description. If comes to the war in Ukraine, Russian losses are being deducted. To do that, I've used Oryx and Warspotting.
@@MILITARY-TUBE None related. Oryx is known by undercounting russian losses by a great number. More reliable are the satellite photos showing how drained are russian reserves, even if we add the new produced weaponry - bu regarding armored vehicles, MBT, IFV, APC, they're loosing more everyday than they can produce - in due ratio, of course (production/losses per month, quarter, semester...). Not even speaking how russia could have lost 4% of his total male demographics. Let's see who can keep up with productive industry, that that feeds economy with income, and war economy simultaneous
The Turkish army is the most war-ready army in NATO after the US. The Turks have been fighting an unconventional war against the PKK in the eastern provinces since 1990 and have emerged victorious. Additionally, they have carried out the Euphrates Shield and Olive Branch operations. Imagine an army that has been fighting continuously for 35 years.
Polen is at the Moment the biggest threat for russia.. Polen is a Powerhouse finnish, norway and swe too badass... Russian lost already the Most of His Military Personal and Equipment
Turkey just signed on with BRICS. I doubt you could count on them. They seem to want out of NATO. And have eluded to it.
@@SoulDamage90 With all due respect to Poland, but do you really believe that Poland, Sweden, Finland or Norway has a stronger army than France, the UK or Germany? Poland has ordered a lot of military equipment, but it will take years until everything is there.
@@bjorndebar8361 realistically, in home defense sweden would be more powerful than france, mostly due to swedens adaptation to the swedish terrain
@@bjorndebar8361 Polen increased His Army, as single country they strongest at the Moment Cuz of russia
USA VS AMÉRICA LATINA
Say when
English America vs Latin American
Easy victory for the US. Not a real military power in Latin America, but keeping the full control of a so huge territory and population it would be (almost) impossible.
Can't even decently feed its people .
It should be América latina vs Africa😂
Russia has the second most powerful army on tik-tok!
Hehehehehehe!!! 👍👍
Cuz the first is North Atlantic Terrorists Organization comment section special forces?
And first most powerful army in real life
@BoSinn555 After 10 vodka's drinks
@@AABB-oi7hvvodka, bears and balalaika - it is all Russia. Ofcouse.
Greece vs Pakistan
Wtf? 🤔😂
Pakistan has a nuclear capability.
Amerika Germania England Republika of Kosova Albania ISRAEL Ukraina.
Imagine beeing compared with Eu Nato and nearly loosing to ukraine xD
Russia controls around ~20% of territory of the Ukraine (not counting Crimea), Ukraine controls 0% of Russia. Biggest Ukrainian cities are under constant fire of Russian forces, their logistic, infrastructure and energy facilities are in crisis moments, they are forced to kidnap they own - young people to fight in meat grinder, because there are no more "heroes" like 1 year ago. And u still saying Ukraine is winning?! I think I don't even want to know how your logic works man, because there has to be smth wrong.
Russia is not losing ukraine
@@ozne8587 so why ukraine is not russian by now ?
Потому что ты видать тупой и даже не знаешь что значит "считаться с потерями" к Украине кстати это так же не относится@@neutrino5266
@@neutrino5266Россия не может победить Украину только из-за помощи НАТО. Но даже так Россия сейчас постепенно берёт небольшие территории и движется вперёд. И это без масштабной мобилизации в отличие от Украины.
Если Россия будет сражаться с «НАТО без США», то ситуация будет та же: НАТО будет очень медленно двигаться, но отвоевать территории Украины не получится. Для полной победы нужно огромное преимущество, которого у НАТО нет
Good video
50% trash army of Russia in gone.😂
Says the bot account from 2023
@@AaronC123-q9t you can get all the evidence you want also on nato-ukranian equipment. Less on youtube because it demonetize you if you share videos of ukraninas dying, well, enjoy the western freedom bot
@@AaronC123-q9t So u think Russia cant produce any weapons? hahah
I think you watch too many BBC or CCN articles. Open Reddit, Twitter or Telegram and then open your eyes. The Russian army is now 30% larger than before February 23, 2022, and is better armed and trained. Old generals with operational brains from the Cold War replaced by new ones who understand today's martial arts, etc. The West underestimated Russia's industrial power and (NATO) found this out when it failed to cope with ammunition for Ukraine, and in the meantime Russia could produce up to 4 million pieces of artillery ammunition per year. For comparison, the West - USA and Ukraine's European allies are able to produce about 1.2 million pieces of artillery ammunition per year.
and 50% ++ of the russians tanks also deads
Command and Control and integration of defence arms would have NATO.
a tactical x
comment from Poland: thanks a lot!
I've always wondered why it takes a combination of over 30 countries to just go up against Russia?
Because russia is the real super power of the world and they know it
30 countries that don't lose a single soldier
Because most European countries are rather small with a fairly low population and each on their own has limited resouces. We prefer it that way in Europe. Most of the time each tend to their own house and then we call on our neighbours when something big needs to be done.
Solo alemania y francia suoeran en poblacion a rusia... sumale italia inglaterra españa portugal polonia.... y aun asi alemania y francia por si sola nonpodrian con rusia@@tessjuel
@@Bumballah3 because +30 countries hates russia and dont want to have anything to do with russians.
America is like 70% of Nato's power both in militarily and financially.
Military yes financially 50 percent
I hope that US doesnt withdraw from Nato, but if they do Europe will be doing good anyway.
5000 nukes or 500 doesnt matter.
Without allies the US are in trouble, thats for sure.
The European NATO countries combined totally outgun Russia, that's for sure; and Russia is the only even remotely realistic military threat to Europe. This is even before we consider that Russia can only deploy a fairly small part of its military in a hypothetical (I hope) war in Europe. It also has to watch it back in case some of its Asian neighbors decides to take advantage of the situation.
There are a few problems that don't show up in these statistics though. One is that we can't be absolutely sure all the European nations will stand together. There are two in particular that are only 99% trusted and one of them happens to have one of the largest military forces in Europe. Also, Russia is already fighting a "hybrid war" in Europe, spending quite a lot of time and money undermining European governments and they've had some success. They even managed to get one of their useful idiots installed as the British Prime Minister for a while.
The biggest problem the European NATO countries face though, is that they don't really have enough ammunition in store for a prolonged war. Even the most advanced weapon systems are useless if they don't have anything that goes boom to throw at the enemy. They are working on it but it'll take a few years to get the production capacity up to the level it should be.
@@tessjuel The European countries that stand a chance are those with Nukes. Honestly most European countries are too reliant on the US for Military and I hate it.
@@TheoVad Do you hate the American bases around the world too ? The very same bases that keeps America safe.
@@TheoVadif you want to lack behind in every other branch like russia you firstly spend exponential growth killing percentages on military and do not exploit allied military support
@@tvsoul5823 I don't think that's the case though because Europe is a rich continent, if they want to build a strong army, they can without boots on ground.
All in all, good video actually
I'm quite surprised by these numbers. I believed that Russia would be stronger than NATO without the USA.
Singapur vs Cyprus
Well after the Intro .. Yes for sure USA has paid a big Military bill ... Trump is right there .. can we please now define what exactly means " got little in return ? "
The ammount of ruSSian bots in the comments is really something xd
“First time?”
a person who thinks he is smarter than others is more often stupid himself, my Not distant friend
эти боты сейчас с тобой в одной комнате? шизоид
Типичный западный человек, а так же ярый демократ и либерал, если с его мнением не согласны, значит ты бот, круто, так держать))
🇸🇾❤🇷🇺
Unless Turkey decides to support Russia.
Grecce is more close to Russia than Turkey, Turkey buy f16 from Usa
Turkey is a whole different story, they are the meaning of Switzerland
@@ClaudiuYyy-sq8nxв политике всё может быть) сегодня турция в нато а завтра за Россию, а через день вообще против всех. В политике дружат с теми с кем это выгодно)
Türkiye has been with NATO in every war.
@@ClaudiuYyy-sq8nx Greece is buying F-35, where in the world you get those non-senses of being closer to russia? just got back your net connection after a absent period of some years? Plus Greece use French Rafale and bough more a couple of 2022 (still to deliver)... I really don't understand where you got that blasfemic idea...
Russia is a 2nd rate Country just look at the them in Ukraine, from Glasgow 🇬🇧👍💙😎
Just look NATO and USA after lost in the afghanistan
@@ozne8587 It was a strategic withdrawal 😂🇬🇧😉
Nato has planes.
And as every war involving aircraft shows, if you control the air, you control who wins.
Rusia+ cina+ korean+ vietnam etc vs nato
Vietnam is a Friend from the USA, btw. Vietnam is not a Enemy from the NATO. South Korea is the same.
Your team is not even allied with each other, and bet in a few years china with take their territory back from russia.
Korea? Which one? Vietnam? WHAT?
China, Korea and Vietnam will not fight on Russia's side
USA and NATO dog's Scared of Vitenam 🤣
Kid's don't follow the News 😂
Putin made a Vitenam has friend
And USA crying in bathroom 🤡
NATO would be second if it were a country? NATO has one country that is already number 2... Holy fk. Those countries are TIIIINY!
Yeah it's pretty crazy, my parents went to Ireland a few years back, they told a shop owner that they only drove 2 hours that morning to go see a few castles, the guy was flabbergasted 😂 Apparently 2 hours driving for Europeans is like 10 hours to Americans.
@@MidwestRider559 That's just a morning commute with construction in progress lol
@@ec6052 You've never been to Europe, could that be?
@@bjorndebar8361 That's not how logic works... Canada is the second largest country in the world with 10 million km2, number 1 has 17 million km2. Therefore, 30 European countries is not even 70% as big as Canada.... but I'd like to hear how your brain managed to interpret "He's never been to Europe" from a statement about the size of Canada? Lol That must have took some serious "mental gymnastics"
@@ec6052 I thought it was about the USA, my mistake. The USA is 2500km from east to west coast, Europe is 3800km from north to south. But Canada is much bigger, that's true.
Yay
Native union 🇺🇸 🌎 vs the world! 👊 ✊️
UK VS NORTH KOREA😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Dprk got 1.2 million soldiers
@@eioclementi1355 of which 90% are malnourished
@@UrHughAnus 3day train ride to dombass where else will they need to go?
@@UrHughAnus who gonna provide DPRK moden combat training in a realistic environment with captured nato weapons. ? Im sure 50-100k DPRK elite guards will sign this contract..and find them self in the donbass in a year.
@@UrHughAnus Korea is a cold place the black sea will like paradise to them. They are allied with DPR and LPR I feel they will fulfil this and assist plus where better to learn then on the battlefield.
🤦♂️Analysis we deserve...
Ruzzia lost in 3 Days xD
in your fiction xDD
@@alexandernaydenov7539 behindert?
@@Itachi-fy7sd huh?
@@Itachi-fy7sd no he is just based 😀 And use english dear Adolf
@@alexandernaydenov7539your disabled
✊🏼🇷🇺 will win
In your dreams
Ruzzian detected opinion rejected
👍
Do nato without usa vs russia china and north korea
China and n Korea don’t care about Europe they are 1000s off miles away there staunch enemy is USA
😢
the china don't want to go in war VS NATO or USA
Tactical comment
What about NATO with USA vs. BRICS?
Doesn't make much sense. BRICS is not a military alliance and some members are closer to the west than to other BRICS countries in terms of military and economic cooperation.
@@Micha-qv5uf Is that necessary?
@@thrashoholic1354Yes because India will not fight beside China. They will fight each other. So it doesnt make a sence to compare.
Brasil is getting closer to NATO, wanting to sell them Embraer KC-390 Transport/refuel Jets and propeller light attack planes like the A29 Super Tucano N (stands for NATO, reason those are being built in Portugal... guess why) for CAS and Reconnaissance, India just dropped the bid for Russian planes and bought French Rafale, SIG 716 for special and frontier units instead of AK's, and much more small weapons from western countries, so not even as a commercial alliance things are going great, also with India buying Russian Oil underpriced and China wanting to pay for russian gas the same as russians pay; South Africa left the conversation, Russia is a mess, Iran continues the trend of losing new ships, with another one capsized inside wet docks!!!! There you have the mighty BRICS
@@Maddog-xc2zv Also Czechia wants to buy Brazilian C-390 transport planes.
Thank you
Realistically Germany alone can beat Russia and same with the UK alone and France alone.
Uk,and France Losed in front of Germany but Russia reached bralin first and saved Western countries.
@@edwarren804 huh?
@@edwarren804 that’s way back in WW2 buddy :/
Tactical coment!
EU vs usa !!!
Лично мне непонятно почему Archer считается как 5 звездочный. Длиннющая махина у которой ствол ещё поднимать надо. Также она колёсная, а значит проходимость вычёркиваем.
В більшості нормальних держав є асфальт а не болото, також вона має велику дальність ураження, зробила декілька пострілів і змінила позицію як приклад
Кожне озброєння проєктувалося для тих чи інших задач
@@hakuto6814 У той же Германии тоже есть много свободный полей. Но зачем им этим Archer захватывать друг друга в Европе , если основная цель --> Россия покрытая болотами? Если честно Советский Союз только за счёт болот и морозов пережил 1941-1942 годы.
@@hakuto6814 Но зачем им этим Archer захватывать друг друга в Европе , если основная цель --> Россия покрытая болотами? Если честно Советский Союз только за счёт болот и морозов пережил 1941-1942 годы.
You should have put the year for 2025 since thats whats coming in January
Se insieme alla Russia ci metti la Bielorussia alla Nord Corea la nato finisce in una settimana
Per pareggiare i conti allora io aggiungo USA + Giappone o Canada...
@@7321cristian Manco c'è bisogno di pareggiare i conti. Nel caso dei casi l'UE (anche togliendo Ungheria e Slovacchia) + UK son più che capaci di fronteggiare la Russia e compagni in un conflitto convenzionale, politica e determinazione permettendo.
@@JustARandomFio Dato che si parla di NATO gli UK già ci sono...
@@7321cristian Chiaro. Io intendevo UE + UK, in pratica l'Europa, senza contare su alcun paese NATO extra-europeo. L'unico motivo per il quale siamo messi "male" (così per dire) è il fatto che la difesa è nettamente scesa nelle nostre priorità data l'alleanza con gli USA e la fine della guerra fredda. Abbiamo tutto quel che serve, nel caso dei casi. Come detto, politica permettendo.
And without Türkiye😅😅😅
Taking account that Erdogan is a friend of Putin we don't put Turkiye as an allied, just another Xi who play poker with NATO. I hope that situation will change.
NATO vs Serbia showing how powerless NATO was and we see how powerless is today also.
It's over...
World is changing inevitably
How did it exactly show and what?
What about russia in ukraine its alot more recent and russias main strategy atm is burn ukrainian ammunition with conscripts
If you are to fight nato russia would get folded
Ukraine with some nato weapons has been destroying russia
@@nicojokelin5547 I guess people in Russia didn't hear anything about own destruction yet? We see economicall growth and we see how all predictions about Russia was false. In same time they grow stronger their alliance. G7 is 28% of world economy and BRICS achieved 35%
I think westerners didn't expect that kind of destruction 😂
54 countries involved in war.
NATO attacked illegally and used all they can but couldn't harm Serbian army. Then they start bombing with depleted uranium, attacking bridges, buses, trains, TV, hospitals, residential areas with cluster bombs, electrical power infrastructure, gas stations...killing civilians, kids in their homes while attacking independent UN country, violating country UN borders and violating UN charters...
It showed how NATO is bunch of cowards, criminals and how powerless they are.
Serbia is much smaller country than Ukraine (7× smaller) and had much less weapons, no sophisticated weapons at all. No help from any side. NATO also is bigger and richer than Russia but showed more criminal and violent but also as bigger cowards and incompetent, weak against much weaker opponent than Ukraine...weaker on papers, statistics...now compare those two. It was recently, 25 years ago and it still lasts with one shape of NATO occupation inside of Serbian UN borders.
World is changing. NATO must be shut down and we have plans, buying weapons, train hard to attack NATO in one moment. Hope it will fall apart before it but if not...we will have to do it.
If you ask people here, many of us want to attack NATO right now, not to wait any more agreements westerners will not respect those documents anyway.
@@bgdabg6769Residents of the border areas with Ukraine live not very well, they are bombed every day and are not interested in any kind of economy. I myself live in a border area and recently near my place of residence several Ukrainian missiles got to the communication center. By the way, about the economy, what we hear on TV is all a lie, only those who are in the capital live well.
Serbia got their ass kicked
@@KNMRoaldAmundsen Did you check the number of victims on Serbian side and all together of those against. It's like 3× more. NATO with allies couldn't take anything on ground. Agreement that stopped the war say that Kosovo is Serbia, UN charter that come out of it say that Kosovo is Serbia. NATO achievements are... Nothing except killing civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure, hospitals, bridges, media, train, bus, random families houses, electric energy....
Looks like nato don't need the u.s.a help, good, then let's stop getting involved with there wars.
NATO needs USA for providing nuclear detergent. The alternative would be for European countries to build their own nuclear weapons and *nobody* wants that to happen. And of course, although the European NATO countries should be able to repell a Russian invasion on their own, more power will make it quicker and less costly.
And if you think USA doesn't need NATO, so far it is the only country that has asked for help from the other members in an actual armed conflict.
With that being said, there is no need for USA to spend much resources on NATO in peacetime and it doesn't spend much either. There are only about 70,000-90,000 US troops stationed in Europe, including the units that operate in the Middle East from European bases, and even that may be a bit more than necessary. What matters, is the detergent it can provide and the reserves it can send if a war breaks out.
isolation doesn't work, read a history book or two.
You do realise the us needs Europe and her allies to buy weapons or the us economy would crash. It's better for the us the way it is if Europe and uk started producing their own military gear it would fuck the us.
@@tessjuelBro, Britain and France have Nuclear weapons.
..yea but always roped europe into your wars In the middle tho...?
get a grip
But with Ukraine;)
Too much russian equipment has been lost to substantiate those figures.
Hi, my sources are listed in the description. If comes to the war in Ukraine, Russian losses are being deducted. To do that, I've used Oryx and Warspotting.
@cjjk9142 The 6000 comes from the Military Balance 2024 and was subtracted by the losses. Regarding the tanks in reserve, so in April, they had around 3150. According to Covert Cabal's video which was released yesterday (on July 6th,2024), this number dropped to around 2500 usable tanks. I guess that depends on who's counting.
bulgarianmilitary.com/2024/04/13/4550-russian-tanks-await-upgrade-by-2026-ukrainian-analysts/
th-cam.com/video/xWCEZUQtUwE/w-d-xo.html
If Russia deploy 10 tanks
Zenlenkeyy : We distorty 200 Tanks.
Console yourself with your stories about the defeat of the USSR in Afghanistan, about the invincible Ukraine, about the military might of NATO, etc.But you are modestly silent about the brilliant victories in Georgia in 2008, in Syria in 2015, in Afghanistan in 2021, and most importantly, not a word about Vietnam.The main thing is that they could not defeat Ukraine!"But never mind, you will still have a chance to win, tough warriors, show how to fight and win.But only you will have to do it yourself, and not sacrifice the Ukrainians.
Nato like zionist.... Bravo russia
Don't differentiate, it's clear that Russia is much stronger than the LGBT army
Lol keep crying
i like it 😀
Vs NATO ?🤣🤣🤣 Russia useless vs Ukraine.
Russia vs. +32 countries in Ukraine and still winning. The western people are a joke i wonder what will do all those USA fan boys when the capitulation/defeat comes.
if you have a brain then you know why russia still hasnt defeated ukraine
@@Timmyisin because Russia can’t do this, because has fake army, even child know this.
Crimea? 😢
Donetsk? 😢
Luhansk? 😢
Soledar? 😢
Mariupol? 😢
Bakhmut? 😢
Avdiivka? 😢
go and visit a doctor pls
@@ZOV_kakashkeVirus how about 3 goodwill gesture from Kiev Chernihiv Sumy Kharkov Izum Liman Kherson ? 🥹🥲
Go to visit psychologist.
but to be fair you could do csto vs nato without usa
Nato paper tiger!
Russia is teddy bear then in this case :)
I ques that math was not your best advantage at schol.
@@ilkeribrahim6541 If the entire NATO with the entire west and all the help with a million NATO soldiers cannot defeat Russia, then Russia is Godzilla!
@@ospehu1 Mathematics or not, Russia is breaking the entire NATO!
@@slobodanstojanovic5521 NATO isn't trying to defeat Russia . Ukraine is trying to defeat Russia ,while NATO is helping them to fight back. NATO it not even fighting Russia . Russia can't even defeat Ukraine with just equipment that NATO provided them lol.
Будет честнее если будет Россия , Беларусь , Казахстан , Кыргызстан , Таджикистан.
Это в случае, если НАТО нападёт первым. Согласен, было бы уместно сравнивать НАТО и ОДКБ
Оркостан просив допомоги в ОДКБ але ОДКБ сказав це ваші проблеми, з якого дива тим країнам допомагати втарим в міре? Там вже деякі планують покинути ОДКБ;)
@@hakuto6814 Тогда была небольшая проблема , а против нато они могут легко объединиться.
NATO has no Chance at all against Russia
And the Numbers presented are Not correct, it is wishfull thinking of the NATO
🙄🤣😂🥱
That's right, the numbers don't match anymore because the Russian tanks are exploding and I can't keep up with the bills anymore...
yes, its not correct, the russians do have the half of these numbers, thx to Ukraine !
Keep on dreaming
@@antoonvugts7484 you're an idiot
Usa without nato
You lie russ army in half is destroyed
Source From Zenlenkeyy bathroom 🤣
If Russia Deploy 10 Tanks
Zenlenkeyy : We distorty 200 Tanks 😭 beleive me
Western media : Yea it's ture 😭
Best wishes !!
It's a big question NATO can defeat Russia in Ukraine with the US, without US they are literally nobody.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH
They cant defeat Russia in Ukraine with USA or without USA because of logistic ;)
@@todorpamukov7435 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAH
The big question is: if russia can't defeat Ukraine, how can defeat NATO with/without USA?
@@g.l.u.3039 To people with a Brain:It can´t,Russia at this time cant defeat anyone!
Interessante il raffronto tra Russia e NATO senza USA.
ancora interessante sarebbe confrontare Russia con NATO senza USA e senza Turchia.
nice vid
Good Info..
Россия очень слаба,потому что не мог победить ни чечню ни Украину,а уже потеряла третью часть военной техники
Ахахах чел ты клоун? Украине НАТО помогает ты понимаешь? Если бы не НАТО Украина бы за 3дня свалилась и всё...
@@МаксиНещерет без НАТО выебет Россию Украина
Ukraine is just arming conscripted farmers with a bunch of nato equipment. Thats why ukraine is losing twice as many men, but less equipment.
@@МаксиНещеретIf my grandfather had had wheels he would have been a bike.
And what you say is false because NATO help came after months the war had started, and still Russians couldn't end the war.
Ахыхвхвхаххахвхвхвх 600к ванек с калашматами и в тапках на фронте забирают территории у страны в 40 миллионов населения напичканной натовским оружием и с 1 местом по силе в Европе. По моему это позор для Украины)))
USA VS CHINA
Hi, it's already on the channel:
USA vs China
th-cam.com/video/jbaubqrxa1g/w-d-xo.html
raw numbers doesn't mean that much. It counts how fast this vehicles can be "battle ready". Germany admitted last year that the Kriegsmarine has 3 operational subs...
Серьёзно? Эххх а ведь были времена в Германии в 1940-х… в прочем о чем это я 😮
last year is a lot of time and Germany does have the major military industry in all Europe.
@@Maddog-xc2zv i think you are quite misinformed. Industry? That doesnt mean military strenght. Reihnmetall produces the most to fullfill exports and sales. Not for the german army. And one year is not much. Not even close to what germany needs to build an army that can be called an army. Historically germany produces high quality armaments but the output is the issue. Thats why te us and Russia are much closer on how to fight and produce than the us and germany
@@Maddog-xc2zv just think that Turkey has more that 3 times the army that getmany has
@@francescozambaldi8212 And Russia towards Ukraine?...
If NATO is such a strong organization, then why haven't they entered Ukraine yet? But because Ukraine has already been divided. The left side of the Dnieper plus the Odessa region will remain with Russia, the rest of Ukraine with Poland. It's a matter of time. And by the way, the professional army is not the one that constantly trains, but the one that fights. There are two professional armies in the world today - the Russian and the Ukrainian.
Tactical comment.
I like how you dont count BMP-1's etc but counting M113 that are not used basically at all
BMP-1s and all of its variants like BMP-1AMs and ex-Georgian BMP-1Us are counted in. Currently Russia has 12x BMP-1Us, and around 700x BMP-1/-1AM in active service. Furthermore they have around 1,300 BMP-1s in reserve.
If comes to the M113s so they are actively used by for example Greece, and Portugal.
@@MILITARY-TUBE Portugal does not use M113 unless as mobile mortars. We do have some, but on the frontlines we use our Pandur II and not the M113 of which many went to Ukraine as military aid, as we're phasing them out completely. Also SCAR L STD are used in the army only (including tier 2 commandos and paratroopers), Navy still uses the HK-G3, many with spuhr kits and aim point devices like the army FN SCAR L (which are complement with troops with SCAR H STD also, but in smaller numbers). Air force land component uses HK G36 while tier 2 units use CZ BREN 2 (phasing out the G-36) and JSOCs use HK-416 complemented with HK-417.
Portugal has donated 45 out of its 190 M113 to Ukraine. Furthermore, they have added to that 2 out of 49 M577.
If it comes to mortars so Portugal has: 2x M125A1; 10x M125A2 ; 3x M106A1; 15x M106A2. There are also some in the "tank destroyer" variant, mainly: 17x M113 with TOW, and 4x M901 with TOW.
If it comes to the SCAR, when choosing the primary battle rifle I've decided to use the "Army" as an example, because it's the best indicator and it's the biggest out of all branches. The Air Force and Navy (with the exception of the Marines or for example AGRUMERG) do not need cutting-edge rifles, so in many countries, they are using everything that the army has spare. It's true if it comes to Portugal and for example Poland. Despite that we have assault rifles, such as FB MSBS Grot or Beryl, when I was training with the Navy in 2021 I was armed with an AKMS :)
@@MILITARY-TUBE Still they don't use them as said. They're being phased out and are seen as death traps. they're only, with few exception I mentioned, as death traps and are not used in front lines, for that we use the Pandur II 8x8, platform we are also investing in to obtain more units. At least do have a practical knowledge of what you're conveying, as excel spreadsheets anyone can read and make but they lack qualitative information - as you also do as your statements are an example.
NATO is carried by the US 😭
And russia by Ukraine 😂
Us as the same size/economy/population as the whole continent of Europe so yeah they carry
@@windowsxp9815 Fr
No its not, most of the US defence budget is in the Pacific.
@@tonycavanagh1929 “No its not, most of the US defense budget is in the Pacific” 🤓☝️
Background musik: Nuclear siren
К чему все эти цифры. Если война с Россией пойдет на полное уничтожение всего живого. Никакая из стран нато не пойдет на прямой конфликт с Россией.
Україна захопила Суджу і нічого, де ядєрний пєпєл? Не бачу , бачу лише десятки тих , хто здається в полон зі сторони рашки;)