Ultra Close-Up Portraits Using a Rare Pentax 67 Accessory

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 49

  • @andydreadsbmx
    @andydreadsbmx 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1:46 Bravo, I was literally thinking this as I started watching it, lol.

  • @kofikumi
    @kofikumi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I am definitely in the "not everything has to hit perfect focus" camp. It is about the emotion that the photo draws. So that shot were you just missed her eyes -- absolutely gorgeous. Excellent work and video

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks! I've gotten a few photos slightly out of focus like that that I end up really enjoying.

  • @Kelei01
    @Kelei01 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Two videos in one week? Yeehaw! 🕺
    Man, you can cut bread with that razor-thin DOF.
    Wonderful photos as always, Brae.

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha thank you!

  • @2071photo
    @2071photo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Well it looks like I’ll be shooting in close at 5.6 cause 2.4 is difficult af but 5.6 still looks great. Love the shots

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks dude. F/5.6 def seems to be a nice sweet spot

  • @kevinscotton
    @kevinscotton 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely burning through that last roll good god (worth it, photo at 11:00 is so beautiful!!)

  • @bobsykes
    @bobsykes 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great way to make an "equipment video" yet still have an interesting story that's your style. That thing works remarkably well! I'd say it gives way better real world results and is easier to use than extention tubes or bellows. Nice!

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Really happy with the results! Excited to use it a bit more this summer 🤠

  • @lightloving683
    @lightloving683 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent. I use close up lenses and extension tubes usually around the house or when traveling to change things up.
    I much prefer using 1 to 2 stops from wide open.
    With the P67, my go to is the T132 with the 150/2.8, 165/2.8 or 200/4 (v1), great combos for portraits.

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very nice. Would like to try some close focusing with the 165mm! That seems interesting.

  • @just_eirik
    @just_eirik 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nice shots! You get a really nice look with that thing.

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It does provide some fun results!

  • @atl_mx5
    @atl_mx5 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    11:08 crazy how nice the bokeh is still at f5.6 here

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      f/5.6 definitely seems like a nice sweet spot!

  • @914bub
    @914bub 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    model is extremely beautiful!

  • @MarcoAries
    @MarcoAries 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've had a handful of diopters for probably a couple years, I should really push myself to use them more

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They are definitely fun to experiment with from time to time.

  • @TheKetchupPacket
    @TheKetchupPacket 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What? a Brae Pentax67 video and no MLU button pressed accidentally ? Am I in the right timeline?
    Really insane how close you are getting with that accessory. And getting the second roll in focus in a time crunch.

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha the 67ii makes it more difficult to accidentally hit the switch. I am long overdue for a nice accidental MLU photo though!

  • @MacnTeensVisuals
    @MacnTeensVisuals 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Jeez talk about razor thin, fair play for getting any of those in focus haha Lovely shots man.

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We tried haha! Thanks dude 🙏🏼

  • @Benjaminjohansson93
    @Benjaminjohansson93 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro these are amazing!!

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks dude!

  • @DeltaSniperZRR
    @DeltaSniperZRR 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haha this is not about the videos subject, but is this your room? 3:19 Such nice use of colors and furniture!

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My girlfriend will love to hear that haha thanks

  • @jasonzayas5487
    @jasonzayas5487 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not gonna lie, ive been messing up some of the 2.4 shots on my 67 and i couldnt figure out why. I dont shoot nearly as much as i used to, so i didnt feel too motivated to chase that demon down to find out why. I never considered that shooting at f2.4 would make your focus ultra hard.
    Thanks dawg. *clinks beers*

  • @kalenderquantentunnel9411
    @kalenderquantentunnel9411 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Close-up lenses effectively reduce the focal length of a lens as they add diffractive power. Your 105 therefore acts like a shorter lens on the same extension, whereas the same 105 mm on a longer extension instead of the close-up lens gives a different perspective at the same magnification. Depth of field otoh at these magnifications largely depends on magnification and shouldn't be any different between both solutions.

  • @MakersTeleMark
    @MakersTeleMark 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That would be sick with some P30 and a blue filter.

  • @mikestanavech7858
    @mikestanavech7858 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They are even harder to find now. You just drove up the price 100%. I have a like new in box s82. Could maybe be talked out of it. Now accepting insane offers.

  • @MichaWha
    @MichaWha 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been using this kind of close-up lens diopters on the Bronicas (SQ-A & GS-1) and it's quite fun but like you said, stopping down's almost mandatory :)

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haha yeah it really is if you want it remotely sharp. The softer look can be fun for certain scenarios.

  • @weizhang6979
    @weizhang6979 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is interesting. I wonder how this compare against the 135mm macro for my Pentax 67, other than the wide aperture of course.

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Would be interested to see that comparison myself!

    • @weizhang6979
      @weizhang6979 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BraeHunzikerMessaged you

  • @sophietucker1255
    @sophietucker1255 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Alicia was a very good sport to put up with you being that close with the camera. My significant other would have pushed me away after the first 10 minutes. Surprised at the number of good images you got at f4 but the 5.6’s were the best overall. Did you try any other f stops like f8

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I only stopped down to 5.6 in this video. Will likely mess around with some at f/8 and f/11 in the future!

  • @seoulrydr
    @seoulrydr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the obvious question - why didn't you use extension tubes? do elaborate as i am genuinely curious. tyvm for the vid.

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Honestly, I just thought the fact that this diopter is a bit rare was cool and fun to make a video about. The advantages I see with this diopter over extension tubes is that it's a bit smaller than the set of extension tubes would be so it's easier to put in a filter kit and travel around with. And certain people might like that it attaches to the end of the lens instead of between the lens that way you don't have to take the lens off if you want to take an image at a longer focal length. There's certainly advantages to the extension tube system too though so it can really go either way.

    • @lightloving683
      @lightloving683 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ease of use really.
      Close up lenses- diopters require no exposure compensation. Extension tubes do. While P67ii would automatically compensate exposure when using the AE prism finder using extension tubes, the P6x7 & P67 would require manual adjustment.
      And as Brae mentions, portability.

  • @matthewmolson2736
    @matthewmolson2736 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What're the advantages of this over the extension set? Thanks.

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Portability, screws onto the end of the lens instead of between camera and lens. Extension tubes have advantages too

    • @matthewmolson2736
      @matthewmolson2736 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BraeHunziker thanks for the reply! Yeah I’d not heard of this filter before. Super interesting.

  • @ml.2770
    @ml.2770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the heyday of film 18min double prints was normal.

  • @charleyfolkes
    @charleyfolkes 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bro, I wonder if your model is charging you enough?!?
    Thanks for the great videos. I just never consider anything below 5.6 but your videos always make me think, like it is kinda acceptable to let the tip of the nose be slightly fuzzy providing the rest is in focus

    • @BraeHunziker
      @BraeHunziker  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Haha yeah she isn't for sure.. Shallower depth of field definitely works well for certain scenarios!

  • @kodithebear
    @kodithebear 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Use a tripod