Richard Hanania Talks Wokeness, Palestine and Other Matters
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
- Richard Hanania is a writer on social science and geopolitics. He's the author of The Origins of Woke and publishes articles at richardhanania.com, where you can subscribe to his newsletter.
Nice to see a show were they are actually discussing and not have set-in-concrete opinions and are just yelling at each other. Refreshing.
"We" aren't failing kids. Government is failing kids.
Richard Hanania is one of the authors of Project 2025.
Noam remember when you told Norm that Israel would never let the Palestinians starve?
I think it’s time to do some introspection.
He is regretting whatever he said that day
@@shoaibmalik6622but he is yet to learn anything from that debate
4 months later: still not starving. Yawn.
@@swarming1092 NYT said that *At least* several dozen children have starved to death. How many more children should starve to death before we determine there is a policy of forced starvation underway?
IQ scores are only valid at the individual level not at the "gene pool" or population level. The individual's results are inferred from a population, however the directionality of the logic cannot be reversed. Much like a blood glucose test result. You could test 300 people for diabetes that doesn't necessarily mean that this "race" is tied to diabetes by genetic causation. You can only say that those 300 people each have the result that they got as individuals respectively.
A lot of Palestinian activists in the comments here.
Japan attacked and occupied an Alaskan island as well.
I read Charles Murray's book. His message is not hate blacks. I think it is something more like this - recognize that certain ethnic groups are not going to go to Harvard or Stanford and do well (of course, there will be individual exceptions). Maybe it would be better for blacks or Latinos to do community college or a state school and get As then to get into Harvard and get Bs and feel swamped. Also, I think his message is Asians have higher IQs as a group than whites ("Europeans"). That does not have to be racist. I am a white man. I am ok with the idea that as a group my group doesn't have as high an IQ as Asians as a group. It doesn't have to be racist. And of course it would not have political implications like voting or who gets what rights.
Whites actually don’t have higher IQs as a group but fortunately have a higher rate of legacy admissions into Harvard than any other group.
Free Palestine and Noam is a twitchy war crime apologist
I guess so is Richard Hanania, a Palestinian who doesn't drink your hateful kool-aid
Shut your mouth and read a book
36:30 Really love this insight about classical music, in the context of rampant relativism especially when it comes to creative autonomy that's guarded fiercely. I'm developing a documentary that touches on this history.
Okay, however you feel about Ryan, he really does look like an alt-right Joker: "you wanna know how I got these twitter bans?" *smiles creepily*
I've got to say I agree somewhat on the race IQ thing but we also shouldn't suffer falsehoods about whether race is commensurate with statistical clusters or gene pools as Noam said. I'm not interested in or fond of people hyperemphasizing IQ at all, but we shouldn't pretend clusters are an erroneous construct or too course or too continuous be informative on race, and I think people have been doing that out of convenience. In other words I think the math basically does tell us that race is real but it would be better to deal with that an an abstract level with global and historical consequences the way Nick Wade did, rather than being so eager to make the domestic issues of our fellow citizens into some determined thing. When people who focus a lot on IQ say things like it doesn't reflect on moral worth, that's very lacking. So I don't like that, but I also don't like people misrepresenting the fact that modern statistics and genomics really does leave the door open and we shouldn't make false claims about the implications of population genetics or say it's completely separate from race.
Very much respect to you! For your defense of free speech. I disagree with you mostly, but I respect what you do.
This checks out.
I really enjoy the discussions on this program, but I experience a very jarring effect every time Noam brings up the idea of “trans people” as if they are some special class of people who are born different from the rest of us. When I hear that you continue to cling to this irrational belief, this political religion, it instantly makes me question your judgment and your commitment to reality in the face of immense social pressure and emotional manipulation, which is what seems to be driving you on this topic.
Noam believes that the pushback against “trans people” is too shallow, but it’s really not that deep. Men who pretend to be women are harming women and children and society in order to validate their own feelings, and that doesn’t become justified merely because the man really really wants to believe or really actually believes. I have no obligation to change my speech and my perception of reality for these men, nor for the women who think they are men. So when they make an unreasonable demands on me, I will fight them in whatever way I need to and that includes mocking their ideas.
You are an !mbecile.
Being a white supremacist isn’t a legitimate difference in ideology, he only disavowed his writings under the name Richard Hoste after he got caught. Jeez you’ve had some really poor quality guests lately, seriously disappointing and gross
I don't understand. But now he's written extensively, repudiating these views. And with that he gives us insight into what was once motivating him. How is that not a worthwhile to listen to?
I book guests like this because I have a curious mind. You should be more open to learning about the real world and the people who live in it.
Or, just talk to people you already approve and agree with. Zzzzzzzz
@@comedycellarclips
"But now he's written extensively, repudiating these views"
You really are a simpleton.
Hanania still believes white people are smarter than black people.
Ergo, no he hasn't repudiated his prior views, he's just distanced himself from his viciously overt
iteration of them.
He only changed his views because he saw there was more money to be made (from the Mercatus center, among others) by towing the neoliberal/libertarian lines. Richard doesn't really believe in anything. Just says whatever will get him attention. Total lizard.
I believe Richard Hananiah is Palestinian.
Not white.
@@benkakanfo1577
Being a white supremacist is a viewpoint, not a racial identity.
The dude is a white supremacist even if Noam the zionist is too obtuse to see that that's true.
Richard looks like a sociopath. Sounds like one too!
He looks a troll demon….dont stare in his eyes too long
He looks handsome
nah just an arab
I don't get this whole "tears in the eyes" thing about people being less white.
A bunch of Europeans show up in China and fit in well. Would it bring tears to your eyes? Would you expect it to bring tears to theirs? I don't think so. Sometimes immigration works, great. The question is about when if ever it might not.
@HonoredeBalzac-ou1jl China? Funny you choose essentially an ethno state with almost no immigration to make that point. I think they just wouldn't allow that to happen since they're so anti immigration.
12 minutes into this and it seems like it's an anti intellectual circle jerq to apologize for some tweet