Futuristic Copenhagen Architecture Builds on Water

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ย. 2019
  • Like this video about sustainable Copenhagen architecture and subscribe here: freeth.ink/youtube-subscribe-...
    Watch the next video in our series on Copenhagen sustainability: • Is Copenhagen the Worl...
    There are two major problems facing cities today. The first is space. For many cities like Copenhagen, space is limited.
    The second challenge, more unique to coastal cities, is rising sea levels. Sea levels for hundreds of coastal cities are expected to rise 1.5 feet in the next 30 years.
    That will put 800 million people living on the coast at risk. So the innovators of Copenhagen architecture are pioneering new solutions to these urban planning challenges.
    They're taking a fresh look at ways to design Copenhagen buildings, and it includes everything from floating dorms to man-made islands.
    See the full article on Copenhagen architecture here: www.freethink.com/shows/susta...
    Check out our other popular videos on sustainability:
    -Green City in Denmark Turns Trash into Ski Slopes: • Copenhagen Turns Trash...
    -The Futuristic Farms That'll Feed the World: • The Futuristic Farms T...
    Follow Freethink.
    -Facebook: / freethinkmedia
    -Twitter: / freethinkmedia
    -Instagram: / freethink
    -Website: www.freethink.com
    Join the Freethink forum: / freethinkforum

ความคิดเห็น • 115

  • @freethink
    @freethink  4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Should we build more new islands or floating apartments?

    • @vbalaji682
      @vbalaji682 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Should plant more trees...

    • @andersengel2772
      @andersengel2772 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Locust Swarm It has to do with how you want your skyline to look like, Copenhagens skyline is made up with a lot of spires, and you want see them if the buildings get much taller. Beside making higher buildings makes the streets colder.

    • @JizzMasterTheZeroth
      @JizzMasterTheZeroth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No! Do you have any idea how expensive a permanent spot in Copenhagen harbor is? And look at how much it's space it's taking up! That's why they've only made one.

    • @talentedofficials2445
      @talentedofficials2445 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No more pollution and than animals will not be able to go up and breathe

    • @luftged8891
      @luftged8891 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vbalaji682 why? Trees are CO2 neutral since they give out CO2 in the night + when they die they also give out CO2

  • @angel964o
    @angel964o 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I am a construction engineer and all these concepts are mindblowing when you see it in person. Living in Copenhagen is a bit narrow, not a lot of space to work with, so these artificial manmade islands have been used for quite a while now, just like the Netherlands.

  • @askepticalcharmander9815
    @askepticalcharmander9815 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Very cool, makes me want to pursue engineering as a career field again to be a part of something like this or inspire these ideas.

    • @freethink
      @freethink  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A Skeptical Charmander that’s awesome!

  • @freddyenriquez4566
    @freddyenriquez4566 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It’s like the floating islands that the Aztecs made. They used it for farming and build enormous cities on them. Nice😀

  • @glutenfreegam3r177
    @glutenfreegam3r177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What about the environmental damage and changes to the marine ecosystem in those waters?

  • @nirangadewruwanperera2540
    @nirangadewruwanperera2540 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seeing my city neighborhood in Colombo in the clips gave me a chill!

  • @Nicoleise
    @Nicoleise 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Holmene is not really as sustainable, as they want to make it sound. The "dirt leftover from construction" is actually polluted soil, and one huge issue facing Copenhagen and the region is that the landfills where this polluted soil is stored are rapidly becoming full due to the wave of new development projects in the city. Selling this project as "Hey, we need a place to put all this polluted soil, what about the ocean?" isn't as easy of a sell, but if you look at the funding side of the project, the creation of the islands themselves is expected to be funded almost entirely from revenue from accepting the polluted soil.
    That's fine - it's a creative idea for dealing with waste, and if the engineers get it right, it's a decent way to deal with it. But calling it sustainable is insane - it's a strange form of justification when the core problem is really over-consumption. The same goes for the large waste process plant - we literally just finished one of those in another area in Copenhagen, and one of the principles it was based on was that the waste should be local and never imported, due to the environmental impact of transporting waste. They barely turned on the main switch on that new plant before importing waste anyways, because the local waste wasn't enough to run the plant at a capacity where it would be both properly utilised and clean. (For incineration of waste you need a high temperature, otherwise it'll create significant air pollution). So why are we building another huge plant, when we're already importing waste from the UK and Germany just to keep the ovens warm on existing plants?
    There *are* a lot of sustainable ideas and projects in Denmark as a whole, but Holmene isn't one of them. It's a creative solution to certain problems, sure. But it's not sustainable.

  • @pongop
    @pongop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video! This gives me some hope.

  • @taylorjohnson4943
    @taylorjohnson4943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Building large inland fresh water lakes. And constructing floating platforms on top of the water to grow food in desert climates would be a really interesting idea and I'd like to see happen

  • @Hassanyaluza
    @Hassanyaluza 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ich fand das video sehr informativ

  • @joshuabondurant456
    @joshuabondurant456 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always want to build something like this but in the ocean

  • @NoName-de1fn
    @NoName-de1fn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty cool

  • @Xanman2000
    @Xanman2000 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    More of this series

  • @LiveTree
    @LiveTree 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a great initiative, we need more projects like this to save the planet #Fairweb #Livetree

    • @yudgiz
      @yudgiz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is not a "planet-saving project". This is a "beautiful" example of urban sprawling. It is going to affect the marine ecosystem. Did u ever consider that?

  • @wonderingmonitor1996
    @wonderingmonitor1996 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    😍😍😍

    • @freethink
      @freethink  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad we're not the only ones!

  • @Judah132
    @Judah132 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every city should embrace innovation and development ... it's how we can secure sustainable as well as social qualities and growth, and yet most cities especially in Europe are bureaucratic and conservative.

  • @sighheinrich
    @sighheinrich 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    SPACE (the final frontier!)

  • @carsonrush3352
    @carsonrush3352 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I really hope that they're not dumping the nutrient-rich topsoil into the ocean. That will make a whole other set of problems.

    • @Theissax
      @Theissax 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Carson Rush I believe they plan to utilize most of the soil from the new metro, so not topsoil

    • @Skate771parts
      @Skate771parts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Of course they won't do that...

    • @dambition7495
      @dambition7495 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      denmark has A LOT of experience with making artificiel islands

  • @marcusthelegend
    @marcusthelegend 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are they gonna build it next to Avedøre Holmen? What a great idea... It's not like it's a land reclamation project BUILT for industrial space or anything...

  • @raphlvlogs271
    @raphlvlogs271 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    should those Architectures be scaled up in order to accommodate more people?

  • @fritsfmn
    @fritsfmn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Copenhagen has lot of space.. build out in other direction . ..

    • @oskarelysee9076
      @oskarelysee9076 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Then it would be too far away from the center. The most popular parts of Copenhagen is located right next to the water.

    • @fritsfmn
      @fritsfmn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oskarelysee9076 ya ya right now it is .. but in the furture ...

    • @oskarelysee9076
      @oskarelysee9076 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fritsfmn in the future it would still be that way, the most popular streets won't just movie

    • @fritsfmn
      @fritsfmn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oskarelysee9076 Nørrebro was a poor working class neighbourhood. But now it is popular

    • @klausolekristiansen2960
      @klausolekristiansen2960 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fritsfmn And fewer people are living there, after many buildings with small, dark appartments have been torn down.

  • @online3010
    @online3010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Did he say "A natural, Man made coast"? I understand

    • @TheMike91096
      @TheMike91096 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hurricanes don't happen in the North Sea. At least I don't think.

    • @online3010
      @online3010 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheMike91096 storm surges. Increase sea levels during storms. Netherlands suffer them, hence their incredible sea prot

  • @luderickwong
    @luderickwong 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    hong kong? we did land reclaimation from sea more than a century. i don't know who is that asking? in fact, even ordinary people here know there is draw back while reclaim land from sea. yes, you claim some land but you kill the sea shore, which, is the nest of breeding sea creatures and fish. alter the channel current will results in soil erosion on unexpected shore which results in flooding, especially when typhoon comes.

  • @dittem8531
    @dittem8531 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I live in Denmark

  • @tubepilot7127
    @tubepilot7127 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Won't these man-made islands like Holmene be the very first to be gone when sea levels rises? I really don't see the point in investing so much in new buildings just a few meters above sea level...

  • @tgood4839
    @tgood4839 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do the riggers come with life jackets?

  • @niklaszeniusjespersen7323
    @niklaszeniusjespersen7323 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    What you forget to tell is that the Urban Riggers are extremely expensive to live in. No ordinary student can afford it.

    • @antonvedel3028
      @antonvedel3028 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They are about $700 per month - equal to the state-sponsored support offered to all university students. This means that students have to make the money they need for everything else by themselves. Considering alternatives in Copenhagen, this is high value for money.

    • @niklaszeniusjespersen7323
      @niklaszeniusjespersen7323 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@antonvedel3028 No, it is not. Despit prices roaring, it is still more expensive than many many other places.

    • @empressrobin2280
      @empressrobin2280 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ok, well how much does it cost to stay there then?

  • @Norseraider84
    @Norseraider84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes let’s build more land for industry and businesses right next to our most busy and clogged highway in the country, what could possibly go wrong ?

  • @Zuiker1
    @Zuiker1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So it is like the dutch province flevoland? That was build like 40 years ago soooo

  • @kickpunchgaming9623
    @kickpunchgaming9623 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One day... We will never have a water anymore

  • @AlxzAlec
    @AlxzAlec 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So Copenhagen should make man made mountains?

    • @Skate771parts
      @Skate771parts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nah. They can just go skiing on top of a trash burning facility instead ;))

    • @dittem8531
      @dittem8531 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I live there! Can y’all stop?

  • @sr.r9232
    @sr.r9232 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    But how the law of borders will evolve?? Because if u start building islands one time or another I will be in internacional waters, then what will we do?? Will it continue to be the same country or what?? It can start new countries !!

  • @spookychese499
    @spookychese499 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What about underground cities?

    • @brandonspence396
      @brandonspence396 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes and? What reasons would it be better than this proposal?

    • @goncalodias6402
      @goncalodias6402 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brandonspence396 not killing the oceans

    • @nobody4y
      @nobody4y 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@goncalodias6402 ahem , flooding ?

    • @goncalodias6402
      @goncalodias6402 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nobody4y that too

    • @mae8646
      @mae8646 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those would not work on the coast though. You can't even build basements under homes in Florida, what on earth makes you think you could build an underground city to help cities directly on the coast? Dumbass.

  • @bzdtemp
    @bzdtemp ปีที่แล้ว

    It is not new that Copenhagen builds on water, that goes back centuries and I think its a miss this video left that out. Likewise some of the water in Copenhagen was actually land - like for example the famous Nyhavn with the colorful houses, that canal was dug out Swedish prisoners or war.

  • @snowtiger1471
    @snowtiger1471 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Like for Danmark

  • @mmtransport
    @mmtransport 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So living in a shipping container is the future apparently.

  • @Me-by8qi
    @Me-by8qi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's plenty of land further in...

    • @freethink
      @freethink  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      True, but it always comes down to location, location, location...

  • @jamieschultz1627
    @jamieschultz1627 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes I made the cut into this video!

    • @dambition7495
      @dambition7495 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      det var godt nok noget af en sætning

  • @user-ie4tt1xp7j
    @user-ie4tt1xp7j ปีที่แล้ว

    1:18 Do people living here calls themselves "riggas"?

  • @glutenfreegam3r177
    @glutenfreegam3r177 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this designer REALLY using Sketchup? 4:23

  • @ArcWelder588
    @ArcWelder588 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imagine being swept out to sea when a storm comes.

    • @gianni.santi.
      @gianni.santi. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Imagine their engineers not planning for that at all.

  • @Phillipzu
    @Phillipzu 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holmene are to be located in Avedøre, not Copenhagen. :v

  • @krzysztofmarciszewski6354
    @krzysztofmarciszewski6354 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Showing the projects and not mentioning the architects is very unprofessional. #big

  • @silversurfer7706
    @silversurfer7706 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:10 photoshopped😂

    • @wakeful5923
      @wakeful5923 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U cant photoshop a video

  • @curtn7076
    @curtn7076 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    bad idea!

    • @Lunavii_Cellest
      @Lunavii_Cellest 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well it has been working in the netherlands

  • @christoffercastberg9789
    @christoffercastberg9789 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ilads

  • @huntertournas7524
    @huntertournas7524 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How 40 downvotes

  • @marcv2648
    @marcv2648 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sounds expensive. Isn't it more important to start building mosques in preparation for the Islamic Republic of Denmark?

  • @Fractal227
    @Fractal227 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    BYG HØJERE FOR HELVET! JEG VIL BO SOM 'THE JETSONS'!!
    IKKE BREDERE!! MEN HØJERE!!

  • @milanvukstankovic5925
    @milanvukstankovic5925 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah, it's much smarter to build hundred of houses on water and take/destroy large size of water, not smart to build one tall building on land with hundreds of apartments...
    Let's destroy both land and water 🎉

  • @user-fs5fc1vv7y
    @user-fs5fc1vv7y 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    All these futuristic constructions are overly expensive and not relevant

    • @nighthawwwk
      @nighthawwwk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True. But the lefty climate loonies love it.

    • @goncalodias6402
      @goncalodias6402 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yup, and they are not evoirnementaly friendly. its just a expression they use. its been proved that the old city centers is the most ecological type of built envoirement. the buildingd have been there for centuries, there is no polution in constructing new buildings there, repairing glass, airconditioner because the glass buildings are greenhouses, they look beautiful so people actually take care of them and they are built with local materials (you dont have to spend fossil fuel in the transport of materials) and besides that you can actually tell where you are based on the old buildings. red brick buildings in northern europe, white lime buildings with clay tiles in southern europe, adobe buildings in the middle east, those are real gree buildings, but aren't modern, so architects wont build like that and will criticise who does

    • @marcv2648
      @marcv2648 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Plus those buildings really aren't optimal for an Islamic lifestyle.