The 3 Bank Accounts for Helicopters

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 38

  • @imachavel
    @imachavel ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3 banks accounts. 2 types of money. Potential and kinetic are the currency. The accounts are rotor speed and forward thrust and altitude. Altitude is the account using the potential currency while rotor speed and forward thrust accounts use the kinetic currency. So with the engine on you can trade rotor speed and forward thrust for altitude. With the engine off you can trade rotor speed and forward thrust between each other. To some extent. The barrier is a catastrophic rotor stall. And obviously with the engine off you can trade altitude for both rotor speed and forward thrust. But absolutely never ever in a neverending never ever scenario with the engine off can you ever trade rotor speed and forward thrust for altitude. As your altitude is only going down as an eventuality with the engine off. Therefore altitude is always potential to be traded and rotor speed and forward thrust are always kinetic.

  • @Code3Films
    @Code3Films 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am so glad your back! I have a mentor now that’s been a helicopter pilot for a long time and I am ready to start this long but rewarding journey.

  • @autom7134
    @autom7134 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A very straight forward explanation of energy management in a Heli. I wish I had of been introduced to this basic concept earlier in my training. Thanks for the video.

  • @AeroheadLS
    @AeroheadLS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was in 67's and your vids helped a ton. My instruments instructor, former Cobra guy recommended them. Wouldnt mind your take on how to develop a routine study circuit to help simplify studying all the info we need. Thanks again!

  • @Delatta1961
    @Delatta1961 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting way to explain the basics. Well done.

  • @davidwallace5738
    @davidwallace5738 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent way of explaining "safety thinking". Thank you sir.

  • @bryanbonanno2196
    @bryanbonanno2196 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the videos sir!

  • @tymoteuszkazubski2755
    @tymoteuszkazubski2755 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For me it makes more sense to use rotor system kinetic energy instead of power available as you directly trade rotor energy for speed and altitude.
    Engine power is then your salary and loses can be seen as fees that are proportional to how much money you have in your account.

    • @helicopterlessonsin10minut10
      @helicopterlessonsin10minut10  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rotor kinetic energy is great for a high inertia system like a Huey but a bad bank account for low inertia systems that use composite blades. Great feedback though.

    • @tymoteuszkazubski2755
      @tymoteuszkazubski2755 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@helicopterlessonsin10minut10 I think it still makes sense for low inertia systems as it is a reminder that you don't have a lot of energy to spare in case of an engine malfunction. This bank account has to have a right amount of money or else angry accountants will steal your rotor ;-)

  • @daveg5857
    @daveg5857 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful explanation

  • @johnswick4593
    @johnswick4593 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very practical explanation/analogy.

  • @ltauzzy4151
    @ltauzzy4151 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great work as always!

  • @Wolfhound_81
    @Wolfhound_81 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very basic and very good. Nothing really new for anyone who's into helicopters (real or simulation for that matter) for any stretch of time, but very important for any newcomer.
    Suggesting you to put up playlists with different 'levels' of understanding needed. For example, I remember how long I needed to really understand transverse flow. Not sure I completely understand those aerodynamics lessons yet XD can be very difficult for a newcomer if that's his first video. But this one here, is perfect!

    • @helicopterlessonsin10minut10
      @helicopterlessonsin10minut10  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great idea. Currently there’s a “basics” and “all aerodynamics in order” playlist. But I like your idea

    • @imachavel
      @imachavel ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well basic or advanced this stuff is always incorporated into the physics of your flying. So is it ever "basic?" On your first day of flying you learn to hover and fly straight and level and probably practice some autos. On the last day you flew...
      ..... You....
      ..... Hovered and flew straight and level and practiced some autos? Maybe some run on landings and hydraulics off and VRS recovery, throw a Vuichard in there? Ok moving on. Transverse flow = "A condition in helicopter forward flight when the air flowing through the rear of the disc is more perpendicular than that flowing through the font. This flow causes a decreased angle of attack and the tencency of the rear of the disc to descend." So really think of it like a hover is 0 KIAS, translational lift is 1 KIAS, transverse flow is at about 12 - 15 knots and full ETL is 16 - 24 knots. All that is measured in airspeed and not ground speed. Transverse flow is that part where you transition out of a hover entirely to ETL. So the air is going into the front of the disk at a closer to parallel angle while the back the induced flow is still pretty downward. Therefore the front of the disk gets better performance from the flow of air than the back. The horizontal stabilizer obviously helps but otherwise the helicopter "tilts" a little bit momentarily between 12 and 15 KIAS then the rotor disk is utilizing full ETL induced flow. In a hover all the induced flow is downward.

  • @QXZ9027MKII
    @QXZ9027MKII 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Top Notch Sir, 👌👌much obliged for the insight.

  • @mohamedboutrik8434
    @mohamedboutrik8434 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So much value.. Thank you so much

  • @bengroce7973
    @bengroce7973 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect! Thanks boss

  • @Son_of_God_Randy_Gage
    @Son_of_God_Randy_Gage 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What if you have to fly low and slow

  • @EvilZombieToe
    @EvilZombieToe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Enter an auto at 200ft AGL? Seems a bit unlikely, but I see what you’re getting at

    • @helicopterlessonsin10minut10
      @helicopterlessonsin10minut10  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bad place to be if an engine quits and you have little to no airspeed. A straight down autorotation may be your only option.

    • @johnswick4593
      @johnswick4593 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@helicopterlessonsin10minut10 Regardless, wouldn't higher AGL allow more time to build energy for an autorotation?

    • @helicopterlessonsin10minut10
      @helicopterlessonsin10minut10  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. That’s the point. Having higher airspeed, altitude, and power available give you more options

    • @EvilZombieToe
      @EvilZombieToe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      With a single engine, you should still be fine above Vsse. But dual engine failure is a bad day regardless.

    • @johnswick4593
      @johnswick4593 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EvilZombieToe VSSE? Dead mans curve?

  • @SkyBaum
    @SkyBaum 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always good to have money 💰 in the bank 🚁 🏦

  • @cecilkipfer7201
    @cecilkipfer7201 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    8

  • @cecilkipfer7201
    @cecilkipfer7201 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    )

  • @diegoplata5570
    @diegoplata5570 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🕶🕶🕶

  • @cecilkipfer7201
    @cecilkipfer7201 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    L