US Testing F-35 Monstrously Powerful Gatling Gun During Ground Trial

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024
  • Welcome back to The Daily Aviation for a feature on the F-35 Lightning II and the powerful 25mm Gatling gun it carries internally.
    Footage Credit: U.S. Marine Corps / U.S. Air Force ,Derivative Work by The Daily Aviation
    Voice, text and video editing belong to The Daily Aviation, any use of these content without permission is forbidden.
    Don't forget to subscribe us on Facebook or Twitter.
    / dailyaviationarchive
    / dailymda
    You have a question or you would like to send us footage. Send us a message.

ความคิดเห็น • 103

  • @KC_Smooth
    @KC_Smooth ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Very cool. It always makes me nervous seeing that covering flap only inches away from rounds being fired.

  • @samvelsimonyan7375
    @samvelsimonyan7375 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    ❤ФАНТАСТИКА !!! ИДЕАЛЬНОЕ СОЧЕТАНИЕ= МОЩЬ - И ИДЕАЛЬНАЯ КРАСОТА !!! F-35 - это нечто из области - фантастики !!!

    • @ooo_Kim_Chi_ooo
      @ooo_Kim_Chi_ooo ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ну да, это искусство!

  • @TomKristiansen
    @TomKristiansen ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:47 The canopy does not move away. the pilot is ejected through the canopy

  • @DEG01
    @DEG01 ปีที่แล้ว

    They said I can't comment for a day. But yet here I am. 😊

    • @erkmejia3320
      @erkmejia3320 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😮

    • @erkmejia3320
      @erkmejia3320 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi

    • @erkmejia3320
      @erkmejia3320 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U the best

    • @DEG01
      @DEG01 ปีที่แล้ว

      VOTE FOR ME DONALD RUMP!!!!! RUMP 2024 BAAAABY.. OOOOHYEAH!

  • @justaguy4real
    @justaguy4real ปีที่แล้ว

    Clearly prepared practice flights is one thing, but what about if in real time hot scenario sprints to jets for scrambles but no time to peepee or poopoo before take off but then gotta do the 1 or do the 2 in fight? How's that work? Party in pants time?? Or is there a solution for that, bc they already have super long flight times.

  • @ScorpoSangs-ud2os
    @ScorpoSangs-ud2os ปีที่แล้ว

    My favorite F35 ,I'm in love with it

  • @Sinaunangpanahon
    @Sinaunangpanahon ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lol, I didn't know F-35 can dog fight

    • @chrisborey1734
      @chrisborey1734 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess they do just in case. Meanwhile the A-10 can help.

  • @TypeRyRy
    @TypeRyRy ปีที่แล้ว

    That's cute...
    Now show the F-35 with the 25mm Gatling pod underneath. 😮‍💨

  • @carloscuegarcia9600
    @carloscuegarcia9600 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ¡¡UAU,QUE BRUTALIDAD!!

  • @edwardhunter3647
    @edwardhunter3647 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks,I am coming soon.

  • @제임스알렉산드라패릭
    @제임스알렉산드라패릭 ปีที่แล้ว

    역시 👍 최강대국 미국 🇺🇸 USA ~

  • @kailashsingh9737
    @kailashsingh9737 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very beautiful sweet landing hi sir

  • @firebpm4977
    @firebpm4977 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Monsterously powerful, for a whopping 3.6 seconds. The thing carrys 182 rounds.... Three one second bursts and a bye bye strafe

  • @-Ale.F-
    @-Ale.F- ปีที่แล้ว

    Que hermoso avión.

  • @cemongajah5507
    @cemongajah5507 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo
    I got a good lock . Firing
    ( Scratch four )

  • @simonm1528
    @simonm1528 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im no engineer, but wouldn't it be better for the cockpit to open the other way to have the airspeed rip the canopy off and away from you if you need to eject?

  • @rdaalsmawe7511
    @rdaalsmawe7511 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    أمريكا نفذ صبرها من تفوق روسيا

  • @erichetherington9899
    @erichetherington9899 ปีที่แล้ว

    STOL rocks! so cool

  • @bundeswehr1131
    @bundeswehr1131 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These days it's really hard to see USAF service members wearing ABM uniform. Multicam is too common among U.S. ally nation military.

    • @DEG01
      @DEG01 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah what you said I also say too. 🫡

  • @tracywhite9400
    @tracywhite9400 ปีที่แล้ว

    working fine too me

  • @mrVincenzo5452
    @mrVincenzo5452 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Stop to war, to wars in the world.

  • @rickyarg5298
    @rickyarg5298 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ahora no rompe el fuselaje?????

  • @Blazen747
    @Blazen747 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That’s pretty cool stuff 😊

    • @DEG01
      @DEG01 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeaaaaaahhhhh?

  • @GarthVonMaraner
    @GarthVonMaraner ปีที่แล้ว

    That very sharp "beak" of the F-35 is just so good to look at.

  • @oahuhawaii2141
    @oahuhawaii2141 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting video, but I need more warheads on foreheads footage.

  • @1XX1
    @1XX1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YEP. Good for three seconds of shooting. Better make it count!

    • @winstonpoplin
      @winstonpoplin ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thats how most all machine guns have been in fighter planes throughout history. When firing rounds that fast you burn through hundreds in a few seconds, and can only carry so many rounds of each type with you.

  • @JasonX2
    @JasonX2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sounds like me "fuelling the loo" after a night on the pints and curry 😅

  • @CrisDFF30917
    @CrisDFF30917 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope I can live long enough to see those real super aircrafts that the US might have under secret.

  • @jkn4088
    @jkn4088 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not sure why they are trying to "sell" this gun to the public. But it is a 25mm gun with only 220 rounds. I hope for guys on the ground sake that it is computer controlled for accuracy. The F35 will not be flying low and slow over the battlefield like the A-10.

  • @gustavore968
    @gustavore968 ปีที่แล้ว

    in americano
    from Buenos Aires

  • @orientalcaesar
    @orientalcaesar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The addition of armament was based on the pilot's request, not the aircraft's design (emphasis on its stealth capabilities) because the US military doctrine changed and did not adhere to the dogfight era even though the F-35 aircraft had multiroll capabilities and air superiority.

    • @oahuhawaii2141
      @oahuhawaii2141 ปีที่แล้ว

      The F-35 isn't intended to be a fighter. It operates in Beyond Visual Range to accomplish its goals.

  • @christophermaurer318
    @christophermaurer318 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    F-35 as a close air support weapon makes me very uneasy. They are so expensive that you know there will never be enough built to do both air superiority and ground support missions at the same time, and when push comes to shove the Air Force will choose air superiority every time. So in times past we had different tools to do both, but now with one tool to do both I'm afraid the troops on the ground will be doing without when tough choices need to be made, and that might not always be the best choice for the big picture.

    • @oahuhawaii2141
      @oahuhawaii2141 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Consider that there are 3 F-35 variants for the roles of the Air Force, Marines, and Navy. The Air Force will use its F-35As to fulfill its job in a battle, much like the Navy will use its F-35C.

  • @hasimdebing6991
    @hasimdebing6991 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow

  • @uchinan_chiburu
    @uchinan_chiburu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    only 220 rounds? thats not alot

    • @chrisbraswell8864
      @chrisbraswell8864 ปีที่แล้ว

      If that is the same as a 25mm Bushmaster that is a Tank buster and anything else that needs busting.

  • @katherineberger6329
    @katherineberger6329 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello, my name is BRRRRRRRRT

  • @jaysartori9032
    @jaysartori9032 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool someday we're shoot laser beams?

  • @제임스알렉산드라패릭
    @제임스알렉산드라패릭 ปีที่แล้ว

    제트기 1층 조정 운전을 하고 ,2층은 4명이 탑재 ,즉 4명이서 십자가 ✝️ 형태로 앉아서 공격을 한다 ,2층은 4명이서 공격 타격 을 한다 ,그러면 ,공격 타격 하기가 쉽다 ~

  • @제임스알렉산드라패릭
    @제임스알렉산드라패릭 ปีที่แล้ว

    제트기 를 2층을 만든다면은 ~

  • @戦闘機乗りの提督
    @戦闘機乗りの提督 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    あれ?サムネの機体って海兵隊に採用されてるB型だよね、確かB型は海軍のC型と同じガンポッドだったはず

  • @williamroberts6803
    @williamroberts6803 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It can’t fire 3000 rounds per minute because it only has 182 rounds in it. Most it can fire in one minute is 182.

    • @bobthompson4319
      @bobthompson4319 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats why its called rate of fire. And why guns also have sustained rate of fire listed with them. Rate of fire is theoretical and sustained rate of fire it is capable of as long as it has ammo. Make sense?

  • @hikmetse
    @hikmetse ปีที่แล้ว

    Halen Türk bayrağı var üzerinde fakat neden vermediğinizi anlamış değilim.çok gülünc bir durum.

  • @peterszar
    @peterszar ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm not an engineer, but having a forward or front hinged canopy doesn't quite fit into my logic, if it supposedly allows for a safer ejection. First, wouldn't the force of wind in a forward flight tend to push the canopy back down onto the pilot? Unless the aircraft is flying backward, then it makes sense, ha ha. Pilot safety just doesn't seem to be the reason the canopy is hinged like that.

    • @TheWildcard4542000
      @TheWildcard4542000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Im sure they thought of that... My guess is, it has explosive bolts on the front hinge that blow it backwards in case they have to eject.

    • @mharder79
      @mharder79 ปีที่แล้ว

      The canopy glass has explosive lines in it to blow the canopy away from the jet.

    • @Mediocre_JT
      @Mediocre_JT ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I was thinking about that, but the entire glass is probably ejected with the pilot.

    • @jachconi
      @jachconi ปีที่แล้ว

      The pilot seat has rocket’s attached the propel the occupant up and away from the fuselage and canopy.

  • @thierrymamin8339
    @thierrymamin8339 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    On parle bien du canon qui était monté de travers jusqu à récemment ?
    De celui qui produit des fissures si on tire un peu trop ?
    Ca ne m imressionne pas

  • @kevinkatz7027
    @kevinkatz7027 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a shame you actually didn't show any of that...

  • @AngelGonzalez-rc6ys
    @AngelGonzalez-rc6ys ปีที่แล้ว

    Una super arma en un avion de papel, mala decisión, el avión mas caro en su tipo que no aguanta mach 1

  • @jesusalfredosegurabalandra2468
    @jesusalfredosegurabalandra2468 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No soy experto en diseño de aviones pero esa forma que tiene este avión no es nada aerodinámica lo evisto como maniobra y es muy lento acomparacion de los aviones rusos

    • @lokodehortaleza
      @lokodehortaleza ปีที่แล้ว +2

      En 109 años de historia del combate aéreo, el factor dominante en la inmensa mayoría de victorias no ha sido la maniobrabilidad, ni la velocidad, ni si llevas 2 misiles más o menos que el contrario, lo más importante es la conciencia situacional. La mayoría de veces te mata un enemigo que no has visto venir.
      El F-35 proporciona a su piloto y al conjunto de fuerzas aliadas la máxima conciencia situacional, mediante la más formidable colección de sensores jamás instalada en un caza, mediante enlaces de datos furtivos, y mediante el sistema de fusión de sensores. Al mismo tiempo, le niega al enemigo la conciencia situacional mediante el diseño furtivo y las capacidades sin precedentes de guerra electrónica.
      Buena suerte haciendo piruetas de exhibición frente a misiles disparados por aviones que eres incapaz de detectar.

    • @firestarter4162
      @firestarter4162 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exacto, no eres experto en diseño de aviones, por tanto lo que pienses no es la realidad.

  • @ryankc3631
    @ryankc3631 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cute little brrrrt - A-10

  • @dl6519
    @dl6519 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The cannon on the F-35A makes ZERO sense to me. The F-35 is NOT a dogfighter and NOT a close air support aircraft in the sense of approaching ground targets at an altitude and speed conducive to a few seconds of accurate strafing. Seems to me the Navy and Marine Corps made the correct decision to opt for more fuel rather than this useless internal gun.

    • @wataril8448
      @wataril8448 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look history with the F4 phantom …

  • @wizardlvl5124
    @wizardlvl5124 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So it's still a harrier using the rolls Royce lift system. Can't beat Brits engineering. It's a joint built aircraft.

  • @benjaminvazquez4471
    @benjaminvazquez4471 ปีที่แล้ว

    Este avioncito no es NADA , en Mexico tenemos una base secreta . No les digo donde porque es secreta. Solo quiero informarles que tenemos los XL3 invicibles , llamados pit bull. hay en promedio 2800 unidades nomas de este tipo. Alcanza un mach de 40 , orgullosamente Mexicano. hablar mas de el es dar demasiadas pistas. Asi que nomas tantienle...

  • @60CAL
    @60CAL ปีที่แล้ว

    F-35 warthog 😂

  • @darell5130
    @darell5130 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happened to the video the screen turned black.

  • @จักรีคุ้มแก้วเจ้าเบว

    👍👍👍

  • @cemongajah5507
    @cemongajah5507 ปีที่แล้ว

    TOPGUN : Maverick

  • @ooo_Kim_Chi_ooo
    @ooo_Kim_Chi_ooo ปีที่แล้ว

    Fat Amy has grown on me over time.

  • @missrussia7804
    @missrussia7804 ปีที่แล้ว

    🇺🇦🇺🇲🇺🇦🇺🇲🇺🇦🇺🇲

  • @LinhPham-oy6wn
    @LinhPham-oy6wn ปีที่แล้ว

    0

  • @ibelieveitcauseiseentit9630
    @ibelieveitcauseiseentit9630 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The us military is so high tech they can't even figure out a way to reduce wind noise when making a film.

  • @eneabenezzi5594
    @eneabenezzi5594 ปีที่แล้ว

    L'industria militare privata perderà sempre.

  • @KimmelSlavko
    @KimmelSlavko ปีที่แล้ว

    This ain't russian trash !

  • @eneabenezzi5594
    @eneabenezzi5594 ปีที่แล้ว

    E un catorcio

  • @davewickizer4506
    @davewickizer4506 ปีที่แล้ว

    Found support a-10 is the master. Bomb ya and the 30mm you next pass if they are still a threat to your guys on the ground

    • @stormjet814
      @stormjet814 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh fuck here comes a SAM

    • @simonghostriley2531
      @simonghostriley2531 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      F111a Aardvark is the master of ground support. A10 is a bloody wannabe while the F111a is the true tank buster.

  • @joseairtes4607
    @joseairtes4607 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🤜🤛👻💥🙈👏

  • @عليتايم-ب4ك
    @عليتايم-ب4ك ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🇺🇲😥

  • @carlosnuckols8470
    @carlosnuckols8470 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    200 rounds ain’t shit compared to the A-10

  • @miguelsuarez8010
    @miguelsuarez8010 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sounds like a fart....

  • @scgrigsby
    @scgrigsby ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Please I don't want to vomit. A 25mm with extremely limited ammo firing at the rate given is a sick joke and only proves the 35 was built for alleged air superiority w/o the slightest concern for the Air to Mud mission correctly referred to as Close Air Support. If you doubt me then do your research on how since Day 1 of the A-10 being the USAF has treated the A-10 and the CAS Mission. Before you yell at me I am not talking about the pilots but about the USAF Management, Career Advancement, and it's Institutional Mind Set.

    • @craigcruz8206
      @craigcruz8206 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meh they have the Apache for air to mud support. IMO these new gen aircraft are for taking out the air defences/fortifications

    • @simonghostriley2531
      @simonghostriley2531 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are other aircraft specifically designed for air to ground combat. The F35 CAN do air to ground but is not specifically built for it. Jack of all trades, master of none, the Swiss-army knife of aircraft.

  • @govnaT-s1z
    @govnaT-s1z ปีที่แล้ว

    all the billions spend on this just to leave the people in the states struggling

    • @AA-xo9uw
      @AA-xo9uw ปีที่แล้ว

      You sound like Judas Iscariot whining about the cost of spikenard.

  • @lionkingmax5247
    @lionkingmax5247 ปีที่แล้ว

    🤣👎🤣👎🤣👎🤣👎

  • @კახაგურული-რ6ტ
    @კახაგურული-რ6ტ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🇺🇸🇬🇪🇺🇸🇬🇪🇺🇸🇬🇪 ღმერთი ფარავდეს ამერიკას საუკუნიდან საუკუნამდე ამინ.

  • @davidperez9442
    @davidperez9442 ปีที่แล้ว

    Despues de una ronda de esas en combate real solo veremos al enemigo caer a tierra en forma de carne picada y pedazos de avion cayendo como un lluvia de lo que fue un avion y su piloto, sin duda una mquina del mal !!! 💀😎💀✈😎👍✈💀😎👍👏👍✈💀😎👍✈👍👏👍🙋💀🙋💀👏💀✈💀😎👍

  • @저먼곳에
    @저먼곳에 ปีที่แล้ว

    비싼 쓰레기