12:28 Sir I didn't get 6 months timeline to respond by Rule 21. while Rule 18 says 3 months, how one can breach this at all. Ext is over this any case.
This means all objections must be resolved within this 6-month period (can be extended by 3 months under Rule 18) -The 6-month period is cumulative for the entire objection process -Extensions possible under Rule 18 but must be requested before the expiry of initial 6 months -The hearing must be conducted within this overall timeframe -If all objections aren't resolved within the prescribed period, the application is liable to be refused
![Design Registration - Filing Process [Form1 - Section 5, 44 and 6]- The Designs Act](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pUXwAB5mzUw/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you again for sharing the videos on designs , sir
sir why another class 6:08 ? isn't it one application one class? im confused please explain!
3.57 scandalous or obscene matter S 4 (d) right?
Oops!! You are write, my bad 😢 3:56
12:28 Sir I didn't get 6 months timeline to respond by Rule 21. while Rule 18 says 3 months, how one can breach this at all. Ext is over this any case.
This means all objections must be resolved within this 6-month period (can be extended by 3 months under Rule 18)
-The 6-month period is cumulative for the entire objection process
-Extensions possible under Rule 18 but must be requested before the expiry of initial 6 months
-The hearing must be conducted within this overall timeframe
-If all objections aren't resolved within the prescribed period, the application is liable to be refused
S4(c) deals with inventive step, doesn't it?