@@estradadavilafernandojavie8684 the germans are known for doing 2 front wars i think they have alot of expierience and also its germany in hoi4 they are so god damn op while the soviets eat fucking rocks every game
@@someonestupid6385 nah, the Soviets if you don't beat them by 1943 they become a pain in the ass, and Germany isn't that OP, they just have a head start.
germans dont have a head start they just have super powerful construction buffs letting them get a shit ton of factories outproducing everyone @@estradadavilafernandojavie8684
That makes absolutely no sense, if we take all factors from this timeline into consideration. There is no reason for the Russians to fight that hard against Germany without Hitler. According to what I know from TTL, Stalin is still in power, so he will still do the purges. So if the war goes like this, Stalin will be overthrown and a peace treaty will be signed with Germany. Greece was nearly down, so they will be overrunned. No balcan front and no east front. Pretty bad for the allies.
What triggered the Allies to go to war with everyone? For that matter, why did the Pact of Rome get involved? Seems like a pretty straightforward defensive war for the Central Powers, fighting against the Communists that the Allies also despise, but all of a sudden everyone's fighting for no discernable reason. Without the Allies and the Pact joggling Germany's elbow, it looked like they would have been able to sweep the Soviets off the map, which would have been a win for pretty much all of humanity.
Yah, I'm wondering this too. I don't see why the Central Powers and Allies were at war? I could see Mussolini maybe doing something stupid to end up at war with the Allies (League of Nations more likely to intervene against him with Germany not in the picture to potentially protect him), or Mussolini wanting Tyrol from Austria and so jumping in when the Soviets attacked... but I still don't see how either of those things puts Germany at war with Britain and France again.
The Ottomans would have had it even worse than that. Sévres was a brutal idea and I'm not surprised that the Turks fought so bitterly to stop its enforcement.
![My Best Timelapse so Far [Part 01] - WWII Hoi4](/img/n.gif)
In this timeline, people will say Versailles was too light.
the soviets really defended against a avengers like coaltion for that long impressive
More surprising are the central powers maintaining that 2-front war for so long.
@@estradadavilafernandojavie8684 the germans are known for doing 2 front wars i think they have alot of expierience and also its germany in hoi4 they are so god damn op while the soviets eat fucking rocks every game
@@someonestupid6385 nah, the Soviets if you don't beat them by 1943 they become a pain in the ass, and Germany isn't that OP, they just have a head start.
germans dont have a head start they just have super powerful construction buffs letting them get a shit ton of factories outproducing everyone
@@estradadavilafernandojavie8684
its a miracle germany didn't win@@estradadavilafernandojavie8684
The German Empire turned into the Weimar Republic not according to the Treaty of Versailles, but as a result of the November Revolution
idea: what if Germany was divided up/occupied after WWI, like after WWII (1920's Yalta Conference basically)
German no Stronk 😢
That makes absolutely no sense, if we take all factors from this timeline into consideration. There is no reason for the Russians to fight that hard against Germany without Hitler. According to what I know from TTL, Stalin is still in power, so he will still do the purges. So if the war goes like this, Stalin will be overthrown and a peace treaty will be signed with Germany. Greece was nearly down, so they will be overrunned. No balcan front and no east front. Pretty bad for the allies.
What triggered the Allies to go to war with everyone? For that matter, why did the Pact of Rome get involved? Seems like a pretty straightforward defensive war for the Central Powers, fighting against the Communists that the Allies also despise, but all of a sudden everyone's fighting for no discernable reason. Without the Allies and the Pact joggling Germany's elbow, it looked like they would have been able to sweep the Soviets off the map, which would have been a win for pretty much all of humanity.
Yah, I'm wondering this too. I don't see why the Central Powers and Allies were at war? I could see Mussolini maybe doing something stupid to end up at war with the Allies (League of Nations more likely to intervene against him with Germany not in the picture to potentially protect him), or Mussolini wanting Tyrol from Austria and so jumping in when the Soviets attacked... but I still don't see how either of those things puts Germany at war with Britain and France again.
Yeah
thanks for all the great content you make keep up the good work!
Thanks!
Idea: what if every nation had a communist revolution except the central powers and Russia
What if the Treaty of Versailles shaped the Europe like Winston Churchill’s plan for post-WW2?
Respect to Waldo Gatoclw, frfr, on god.
timeline was wild...
Lore of What if the Central Powers weren't punished Hard after WW1? | HOI4 Timelapse Momentum 100
Wasn't punished hard is an understatement compared to what happened to austria hungary
The Ottomans would have had it even worse than that. Sévres was a brutal idea and I'm not surprised that the Turks fought so bitterly to stop its enforcement.
Why did France go commune even after the victory of ww2
So Bulgaria isn’t even punished…
They already did get it rather light, besides the usual reparations and military restrictions.
@@gengarzilla1685 true, but you’d think Greece would still get a tad bit of land
Was that clip of Wilhelm III real?
yes
@@HandOfWar that’s so cool!
Nice
Idea: what if everyone had a communist revolution in 1910 except for russia