Wow you're a brave man!!😄 this just looks like a (as you have pointed out) very very basic and inaccurate kit! I just finished part one of your video and I'm looking forward to watching the next two installments! Keep up the good work! 👍
Even as a USAF veteran, the Flanker is my favorite fighter too! It's such a beautifully designed aircraft. What Revell did with this kit is a war crime!
For this kit it's not even worth the cost. The model will be so incorrect in so many other places that spending the money on resin nozzles is just a waste - of course that is just my opinion.
Its a precision applicator for liquid glue, not super glue. Her, you can check it out - www.amazon.com/Flex-File-7000-Touch-System/dp/B00NG4HWMQ/ref=sr_1_2?crid=B30K50NE54W&keywords=touch+n+flow+applicator&qid=1649231062&sprefix=touch+n+flo%2Caps%2C69&sr=8-2
I thought that the Italeri su-27 kit was terrible and that nothing worse could exist. My feeling when I finished assembling was a single word DISILLUSION
Too much overthinking, in my opinion. It looks like a nice basic kit and if it’s not accurate as a real Flanker, it’s a good candidate for a “what-if”?
You can call it overthingking, but don't most modelers strive for accuracy in kits? Kit reviews online mention the accuracy - or lack thereof over and over. The aftermarket industry thrives on correcting inaccuracies of various kits.
Really enjoyed watching that man, something different and put a smile on my face, Thanks 🙏🏽
I renenber building this back in the 90s. I now have a Trumpeter SU-27 sitting on the shelf waiting to be built.
How do these not have that many views
Great video! Can't wait to see how it turns out.
Wow you're a brave man!!😄 this just looks like a (as you have pointed out) very very basic and inaccurate kit! I just finished part one of your video and I'm looking forward to watching the next two installments! Keep up the good work! 👍
Thank you!
The su 27 is my fav plane and this box art made me cry and lose brain cells. HOW DID REVELL GET IT SO WRONG!
Even as a USAF veteran, the Flanker is my favorite fighter too! It's such a beautifully designed aircraft. What Revell did with this kit is a war crime!
Have you thought about resin engine nozzles?
For this kit it's not even worth the cost. The model will be so incorrect in so many other places that spending the money on resin nozzles is just a waste - of course that is just my opinion.
Whats that Syringe looking glue tool that you are using? Does it hold super glue or do you dip it in?
Its a precision applicator for liquid glue, not super glue. Her, you can check it out - www.amazon.com/Flex-File-7000-Touch-System/dp/B00NG4HWMQ/ref=sr_1_2?crid=B30K50NE54W&keywords=touch+n+flow+applicator&qid=1649231062&sprefix=touch+n+flo%2Caps%2C69&sr=8-2
@@AirForceBuilder Neat. Does it act as an instant bond like super glue? 👍🏻
I thought that the Italeri su-27 kit was terrible and that nothing worse could exist. My feeling when I finished assembling was a single word DISILLUSION
Is the new su27 model good? I buy it on amazon and now im worried
If you're talking about Revell's new SU-27SM, it is a very good kit. It is a modern mold and much more accurate than this one!
@@AirForceBuilder thanks man 😎👍
How about building this one to spec then biuld a real flanker to your specs and have folks vote on their favorite one.
Is this Steven's toy reviews secret model channel
I don't know if that is good or bad. I have some channel watching to do...BRB
the nose is really ugly, Revell at least uses the zvesda kit now its a lot better
Too much overthinking, in my opinion. It looks like a nice basic kit and if it’s not accurate as a real Flanker, it’s a good candidate for a “what-if”?
You can call it overthingking, but don't most modelers strive for accuracy in kits? Kit reviews online mention the accuracy - or lack thereof over and over. The aftermarket industry thrives on correcting inaccuracies of various kits.