MPC VS DAW: 9 Reasons Why the MPC is Better!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 319

  • @bonafidebeatz20
    @bonafidebeatz20 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Spoken with Facts. The MPC 2500 holds up till this day in my setup 🫡🫡🫡

    • @3M8RY0
      @3M8RY0 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      1000/2500 are great. The XL was the pinnacle in terms of ease of use & vintage sound.

    • @CORLEYKG5000
      @CORLEYKG5000 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      JJOS all day

    • @DanielIvan707
      @DanielIvan707 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      2500 is a beast!

    • @Boombaptreetz
      @Boombaptreetz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Legendary machine 🙏🔥

    • @WestonStephens
      @WestonStephens 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      JJOS go hard AF. LEAN & MEAN. The program page has everything there, no fuckery.

  • @mpbangamusic9673
    @mpbangamusic9673 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I start on standalone MPC, export to DAW, add sauce. Job done!

    • @liveyhuggyman7027
      @liveyhuggyman7027 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Saaaame

    • @s.gharavi1614
      @s.gharavi1614 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly

    • @ramsey4630
      @ramsey4630 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mpc sequencer and swing is what it's most popular for why get away from it . Controller mode you have the best of both worlds . But that just my 2cent.😂

    • @s.gharavi1614
      @s.gharavi1614 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ramsey4630 I almost exclusively use the mpc x in controller mode, so I can use my monitor with the built in screen together

    • @ramsey4630
      @ramsey4630 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@s.gharavi1614 dope!

  • @Darthimpakk
    @Darthimpakk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    Why not both? I use my MPC for preproduction, Ableton for post production. Works for me

    • @drollins9973
      @drollins9973 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ableton for difficult samples for me.. 😇

    • @Mr.CireSoprano
      @Mr.CireSoprano 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I really want to try Ableton
      I'm about to buy it in a little while.

    • @donuzoka8858
      @donuzoka8858 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What you mean by preproduction and/vs post production? Real question asking for a friend 😊

    • @newday8545
      @newday8545 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@donuzoka8858 pre is preparing sounds and post is for automation/effects, mixing, and mastering.

    • @s.gharavi1614
      @s.gharavi1614 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I haven't post produced anything yet, but I plan to use Ableton for it. How difficult is it to transfer?

  • @CraicPype
    @CraicPype 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    100%. Been playing instruments and using DAWs for 30 years. Got a Live 2 last year and I've never been so productive. Limitations. Muscle memory. Then it's just you

  • @matthewgaines10
    @matthewgaines10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    There is no better but what is better for you personally. Ask 100 people what is better and you’ll get 100 unique answers.
    People who ask “which is better” largely don’t really understand their needs and wants, thus ask non-specific questions. When you understand your goals and needs, you ask better questions.

    • @tombasports
      @tombasports 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      you have to realize what you want to do and when you do it doesn't matter the platform you just...DO

    • @MarcM143
      @MarcM143 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Right! Is like asking what is the best speakers.

  • @MOREBEATSTV
    @MOREBEATSTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I remember when FL dropped and we started using that along with ACID. We got so much hate from the old heads. At that time we were strictly using the MC-505 MPC 2000 and the Rm1x. We couldn’t have imagined how far the DAWs would advanced to. FL didn’t even have a playlist or mixer when it dropped. I just remember how I was able to make so many more beats in a shorter time and how my sampling went to a whole other level.

  • @xkidmidnightx
    @xkidmidnightx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Computers are definitely more powerful and flexible, but I prefer tactile and I don’t want to get home from staring at a screen only to stare at one more. TBH I prefer my acoustic guitar and banjo more than anything. Pick it up and it makes noise immediately

    • @elementlab41
      @elementlab41 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Couldn't agree with you more. Love, love my computer for work, I've just never figured out how to play it like an instrument. I wish I could do it! Would be so much cheaper and more efficient, but I love being able to make sound with my hands. So much respect to the DAW users. I'm probably listening to your music rn! But Ave always brings such a balanced perspective I admire.

  • @JamesJohnson-xx5gq
    @JamesJohnson-xx5gq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Your right Ave, and i absolutely love the freedom the MPC and Maschine gives me to work❤️👍🏿

  • @justinrivera1603
    @justinrivera1603 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Stick to where you’re comfortable at and keep on creating what you love to create that’s what matters😊 because at the end of it, they both do the same thing they both put out some good music either way😊

  • @channelite
    @channelite 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like your background music. Seems appropriate for the theme you’re talking about.

  • @marceljasper4774
    @marceljasper4774 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Im in IT business and sit in front of a PC all day, I'm glad to come home and dont have too use a mouse and keyboard anymore but can hit the Pads on MPC1

    • @femz6438
      @femz6438 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Honestly the best comment. I stare at charts and data all day and thinking of getting the one +

    • @marceljasper4774
      @marceljasper4774 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@femz6438 you should bro, total worth it

  • @aldofloresesq
    @aldofloresesq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent work product on this channel. I am in the market for a groove box. I dabbled in the 90s and now I’m interested in returning to beat-making as a hobby. Your channel and videos like this are incredibly helpful for newcomers. I greatly appreciate your work. Thank you!

  • @InspelaRecords
    @InspelaRecords 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When you talk about developing, I think a great danger with DAWs is thinking that you’re better than you actually when you’re starting out. It’s so easy these days to browse some loops in a DAW, click on ones that sound good together and without any editing, press play and go “I did that!” Well, no you didn’t. As someone who’s done this for 37 years and had 14 or more MPCs, the one thing I can say for sure is you’ll edit and chop your samples more to find your sound than you will on any DAW. I’ve just recently got my first new MPC in a while - an MPCKey 37 - and I’m so happy to be back in a place that feels more creative, especially with the fourth coming MPC 3 features. Great video. Really enjoyed it!

  • @TheTonyTitan
    @TheTonyTitan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I started using a mixer, it killed the latency issue. When you use a desktop or laptop, you gotta optimize it for music. That means buying whatever improves your studio.

    • @Ryan-ld2nj
      @Ryan-ld2nj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I recently started trying to use controller mode and the performance was so stuttery and poor. Don’t know if it was my laptop or what, but it ruined the entire process. I switched to my mixer for the first time (was previously using it as a glorified audio interface for a mic) and it’s been a way more fun process overall.

    • @JewelzFin
      @JewelzFin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Underrated comment. Everyone should use a mixer when producing (if they can afford one).

    • @LeLe3000Stacks
      @LeLe3000Stacks 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which mixer do you have?

  • @neoSoulLofi
    @neoSoulLofi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Both are useful, in my opinion but you don't need a DAW to make music it's just cheaper overall. Most MPC users, including myself also tend to have more external gear and a few instruments.....dealers choice I guess. I prefer my x se and external gear but I will mix down in Ableton

    • @arkimwilliamson4429
      @arkimwilliamson4429 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Best daw for my laptop?? Sampling?. Beats?

  • @nofaceexe
    @nofaceexe 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Appreciate you a lot brother. I watched a lot of your videos the last weeks and you literally teached me how to use a MPC. Bless you 🙏🏽

  • @ant1198
    @ant1198 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I just got my first MPC after using Logic Pro for years. I must admit it’s pretty awkward for me right now. But I’m gonna stick with it.

    • @KAUTIOUZBEATZ4
      @KAUTIOUZBEATZ4 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Fam stick with it you going to thank your future self later lol.

    • @beatbuildersstudio
      @beatbuildersstudio 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I only been thinking about getting an MPC because I watch too much TH-cam lol. I love Logic Pro but it may be interesting to add something different to my setup.

    • @marcelogasull1545
      @marcelogasull1545 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      same situation here.. I wish the MPC workflow was more intuitive as Logic Pro

    • @AfroEuc
      @AfroEuc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KAUTIOUZBEATZ4Im not giving up myself. Ive watched a million videos and still learning. 😅. It's tough but i sense a light at the end of the tunnel

    • @chosenonebeats
      @chosenonebeats 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Just use both🤷🏾‍♂️

  • @simcitybigworldmedia
    @simcitybigworldmedia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Working with FLSTUDIO for over 20 years , I got my first MPC ONE last year , you can cook up quick with both of them and obviously FLSTUDIO is more powerfull , however making music on the MPC it lit , it's lots of fun chopping up samples and making loops with the pads , and it's super quick , also , whaaaa gwarn with the stems ? When we getting stems man

    • @Soundninja1994
      @Soundninja1994 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same 🤲🏿💎

    • @airmaxtrin
      @airmaxtrin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Im the same been on FL since 3.0 Ive had all kinds of gear over the years I always go back to FL. The work flow just works from me. I copped the MPC one last year and returned it. Wasnt for me.

    • @simcitybigworldmedia
      @simcitybigworldmedia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @ntrinidad716 would be super lit 🕯 if FLSTUDIO brought out a Groove Box like the MPC , Akai would definitely be in trouble, FLSTUDIO big touch screen with 16 pads and keys , bluetooth , wifi , and can Charge up

    • @wm1573
      @wm1573 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      FL already has stems too

  • @joonglegamer9898
    @joonglegamer9898 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You pretty much hit the nail on the head. I've been into music production as a hobby since I was a kid in the 80s. Midi recording has always been a tricky one for me, nothing was ever compatible with anything. And synthesizers recording functions were so cumbersome that I basically gave up. I fared no better with Cubase or the likes, too overcomplicated and youtube tutorials were never up to par with the current or whatever version I had. No to mention the ASIO driver adventure, and the sound interface lag adventures you're mentioning.
    Then I bought an MPC key 61 on a whim 2 years ago when it launched, basically because it kinda ticked all my boxes. Oh boy did it change everything in my musical life. For the first time in my life I could just press record, pick the next sound, press record or dub again, and everything was logical - didn't even have to read a manual, now THIS thing is intuitive.
    In fact - I'm not very spoiled for success stories, so to me - sitting there 5 minutes later with an actual beat, an actual song, an actual production... in 5 minutes was to me something I'd never ever think I'd see or experience in my lifetime, and I'm old now. I wish I had discovered MPC's years ago, but I always thought they were for beatmaking only since so many beatmakers used them, and I'm a traditional synth slash piano player self taught with all the bad habits you can imagine, so it's a special sauce for sure.
    But that's were I was so wrong, the MPC is an entire music studio, and it hooks up to whatever I throw at it. In fact, I could hook up ALL of my sound gear to it, and it wouldn't bat an eye.
    The fact that I can sample on the spot, play music with synths on the spot, barely any setup-time AT ALL, just hit record and play, to me.. yeah, It was one of those Holy moments people talk about when they see the light. I've never looked back since.

  • @ajv5tn
    @ajv5tn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Being able to go DAWless on my MPC ONE+ has changed my life. Back in the day I had a MPC 2500, 2000xl etc but I took a few years off music organically, When I came back to the MPC ONE+ has been the key to falling in love with creating music again.

  • @mr.mr.3662
    @mr.mr.3662 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    And whatever you make music on just enjoy the process and have fun 😂

    • @thetruemrstallings
      @thetruemrstallings 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True.

    • @SimonePhoenix
      @SimonePhoenix 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thankya!!! 🙌🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

  • @musicproductiontips3121
    @musicproductiontips3121 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You've made some valid points. Latency being 1. Adjusting buffer sizes between mixing and recording is a headache. Also the point on finger drumming. I have a MPC Studio MKII and although it's good for finger drumming, it's not the most aesthetically pleasing to look at like an MPC stand alone unit. Great video.

  • @joegrant413
    @joegrant413 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amen to the points on tech setup and configuration. I can hop on MPC 61 very quickly and don’t think at all about this stuff.

  • @anactualalpaca7016
    @anactualalpaca7016 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been using a DAW for about 3 years now, and honestly Ave made these lil machines look real tempting

  • @notwasnot
    @notwasnot 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You are so spot on . I hope people out there realize how important this clip really is

  • @harveygarrett4129
    @harveygarrett4129 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My prediction is that one day Akai will come out with a laptop style MPC functioning like an MPC but with pads and mini keys dedicated just for making music 🤔

  • @nicerperson1
    @nicerperson1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    "When I first started out, computers were absolute, utter dog shit" - holy shit that cracked me up........... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @LG-ro5le
      @LG-ro5le 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Windows 98 has entered the chat

    • @locdogjr
      @locdogjr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Needed that Pentium MMX upgrade

    • @AveMcree
      @AveMcree  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      just telling truth lol

    • @MusicArtlIfeQ676
      @MusicArtlIfeQ676 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "HIS" computer was utter dogsh*t, my producer used to make beats on cakewalk that were amazing, he produced for many rappers including joe budden etc. WMS The Sultan, look him up sometime.

    • @markjackman1712
      @markjackman1712 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Commodore Amiga with Protracker 2 and an external parallel port sampler module! 1993

  • @thecreepysilence4290
    @thecreepysilence4290 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I, personally, use the MPC as my DAW. Also, I would never fully understand the critic about the 2 GB of RAM. I record alot of presets in the MPC. Pads, Chords that have an lenght about 8 Bars or longer, SFX and other samples. Even then I didn't even come close to pushing them to their limits. The RAM was at 45 percent capacity, no more. I make Techno and experimental stuff with the MPC

    • @esterix101
      @esterix101 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't know. For me its so easy to fill ram if I use bought plugins from akai. Studio strings alone eat 45% of ram.

    • @thecreepysilence4290
      @thecreepysilence4290 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@esterix101 i dont often use the internal Synth of the MPC. Mostly I use external Synth and record the sounds straight into the MPC. Works fine.

    • @esterix101
      @esterix101 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thecreepysilence4290 yes, that's best. That's how MPC should be used honestly.

    • @thecreepysilence4290
      @thecreepysilence4290 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@esterix101 when I use the internal Synth, then only the synth which are on the MPC for free. That are also great Synth

  • @joegrant413
    @joegrant413 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Look forward to listening! My two cents: I am on computers ALL DAY in the day job. And I play real instruments with real musicians, so I can't ignore the fact that muscle memory is a real thing. That's why I like working with MPC. And that's why I loathe any software glitches or super-obscure UI stuff. I want to relax and play and record.

  • @tomherwig8296
    @tomherwig8296 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Ave, very good and important points you have made. Especially thumbs up for mentioning MIDI latency. And there is also the problem of MIDI jitter, which is latency's best friend 😏. And there is another point: yes, we can talk about power, memory, number of plug-ins, does the Minimoog in that VST sound 1% better than the MPC plugin and so on.... But the most important point is: What instrument inspires you? And I got a lot out of your statement that this point is also there for you. Hm, I can also plug a controller into my laptop, I can have a controller like Push or Maschine and trigger my sequences, I can plug a controller for my synths into my laptop.....yes, you can. But the "feel" of the direct access of a Groovebox (I had an MC-707 for example) is so much more "direct" and configuration free and hands on. Even these Grooveboxes are just computers. But all this "slightly" better timing, accessibility, no configuration and of course the focus on the music is inspiring. And that is what music is all about. I have Logic Pro and look forward to getting an MPC Key 37 as my inspirational tool. Thumbs up for the video!

  • @aetherkat
    @aetherkat 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for some great points! I'm considering getting my first MPC on my tax refund for many of the reasons you mention: higher audio quality, dedicated audio solution, less distractions.
    I hadn't considered the issue of latency, but with all the work I do syncing samples to line up directly when I hit a pad on my 404, hitting a key on my laptop and hearing a synthesizer note half a second later would be so annoying!
    The one other big reason I'm considering a dedicated hardware DAW is, I make stuff on a laptop ALL DAY for work. When I clock out and make some music, I don't want to feel like I'm still at work. I want to feel like I'm really playing an instrument and making sounds to groove to before I ever cut the track.

  • @MoneyTravelsPRO.motionRadio
    @MoneyTravelsPRO.motionRadio หลายเดือนก่อน

    Having invested into DAW & Standalone, it's Fun and mentally challenging to operate in both Realms. It's Super Fun watching Nick Mira rock out on his Computer then joining Bolo experience on his Standalone's 🖤

  • @stranger_here_m
    @stranger_here_m 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Absolutely true on all points. I’d add the tenth. MPC teaches to make music by ear. In the DAW I’m pretty much flying by numbers. On MPC if it sounds good, it’s good.
    Though limitations of MPC also make some genres much harder to produce. If it is a soulful jam, then MPC all the way. But if I want to make a techno or electronica music, with ton of modulation and polyrhythms, then I’d go with a DAW.

  • @theillsun
    @theillsun 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I play instruments. I like to play my drum tracks and melodies. I'm not a mouse arranger. No disrespect to those who are, but nah.😂

  • @jaderington
    @jaderington 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Reasonable points indeed.
    I have both so I suite my emotional flex. My MPCx is cool but Bitwig has me so gripped with hardware synths at hand to join in

    • @arkimwilliamson4429
      @arkimwilliamson4429 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bitwig?

    • @jaderington
      @jaderington 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@arkimwilliamson4429I mentioned Bitwig in my post

  • @jsmacks11
    @jsmacks11 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I used an MPC 2000 in the 90s with a Roland xp50 and Kurzweil k2vxs.
    I found that it was much faster to get a song started and you focused more getting parts right than tweaking sounds/effects.
    When I transitioned to a DAW and mainly softsynths, it was a bit slower to get a good foundation going.

  • @aspirativemusicproduction2135
    @aspirativemusicproduction2135 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    On my smartphone I can record any sound from everything on internet and turn it into music. That's powerful. We didn't have that just few years ago. I don't know what people are looking for.

    • @arkimwilliamson4429
      @arkimwilliamson4429 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hmm. What u recommend. For my laptop. Sampling. N beat making

    • @aspirativemusicproduction2135
      @aspirativemusicproduction2135 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @arkimwilliamson4429 I honestly can't give you a good advise sinse I haven't stayed current with other programs for years. I personally use FL Studio and Mixcraft. Are they the best? Probably not. Many people use Ableton, Studio One, Logic... I'm pretty sure any of those have something to offer. The guy who made this video probably has tried more programs and can tell you what he likes and dislikes about each of them. I can mostly talk about how I got to use FL Studio but that's not going to be very helpful.

    • @aspirativemusicproduction2135
      @aspirativemusicproduction2135 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @arkimwilliamson4429 I am using FL Studio. I can't make comparison with other programs because I don't use them. I am simply not the right person to give advice.

  • @Davinciblack_
    @Davinciblack_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fl studio is literally running the game right now

  • @infinitarchitectbeats
    @infinitarchitectbeats 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The MPC's can be considered a more portable DAW, they all have CPU's, RAM, and hard drives. They are computers just with a different physical interface. I don't understand how you can say an MPC is better and I own a bunch of MPC's, I love them just as much as I love my DAW.

    • @slapopimp
      @slapopimp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @infinitarchitectbeats __Being highly biased one direction will bring that perspective! IMO, saying in the title, why the MPC might be better vs saying why it IS better, says it all.

    • @s.gharavi1614
      @s.gharavi1614 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I prefer MPC over DAWs and I only use it in controller mode. It's just a better system for me. And I make extremely complex music.

  • @jean-philippematte3701
    @jean-philippematte3701 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I used to love making beats on my MPC 2000, great sound, great workflow as a producer. But when it comes to tracking and sending the beat to a daw to record and mix…what a pain…! I remember being with an artist, setting up the beat to the song, arrangements and stuff, then sending it to the computer, record the artist, then he was like, I’d like to change that part of the beat, then you do it, then there’s another one…hours of refining stuff. I switched to daw around 2003 for that reason

  • @klisher
    @klisher 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These are all great points. One other one. The drum/sample programs, each program can have 128 samples and you can have 128 tracks of programs. As where, with a DAW if you want each drum separate you can only have one per track .

  • @Blazethecreative
    @Blazethecreative 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dope vid Ave! we all ghosted that pirates of the Caribbean producer at some point in our lives lol.

  • @CarlosSixJulyBroady
    @CarlosSixJulyBroady 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    that beat 🔥you taking over👊🏾

  • @drebone1986
    @drebone1986 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Respect Ave MCree, first comment highlight of mine to make a video. Momma I made it 😂

  • @OtisKanno
    @OtisKanno 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Hybrid is the way. Get hardware that offers something unique regarding sound or workflow. Save money & do the rest with plugins.

    • @remyvegamedia
      @remyvegamedia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree with this! I need a little of both to keep the momentum going. Sometimes I need to slow it down, sometimes I need as little friction as possible. Each environment offers different avenues for inspiration for me.

    • @towerrunner4675
      @towerrunner4675 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      💯% true. A DAW and one groove box at least. I usually say: If you want to figure something out, go two routes at the same time, and you can't miss the target.

  • @DT1One
    @DT1One 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Have the Rossum SP 1200, Mpc 3000 LE, 4000 Studio Maxxed, Mpc Live, Maschine Studio, MK3 (x2), Maschine+, Isla S2400, 404 MKII, TE KO II (x2)
    I recently pulled out my push 2 controller, connected it to a 5 year old laptop (i7 2.8 quad, 1TB M2 Nvme, 16 gigs ram, win 10, opened live suite 11 with Serato sample 2.0 and it absolutely blew my mind. I suddenly look at all the aforementioned units and ask myself why I’m keeping them? If I had to choose one standalone to keep it would be the mpc 4000. If you know, you know. How or why the 3000 LE and the SP1200 sell for more baffles me. They do not knock more or sound or feel better to me.
    I’ll be using push 2 w live 12 suite (just bought the upgrade) and Serato sample 2.0 (man is it sweet) until for whatever reason I get bored and jump back to the 4000.
    What a fantastic sounding standalone; OS 1.71 holds up well and I have internal/external ssd hooked up to it.
    Using translateor 7 pro I can easily batch export mpc expansions, kontakt libraries , etc to mpc 4000/3000; route the 4000 into Live/Pro Tools Ultimate via analog out, or Adat to arturia 16 rig, RME UCX
    I honestly can’t say one is necessarily better than the other. What I can say is that we all have a problem worshipping akai mpc’s. And being a gear head with adhd makes it worse because anything with buttons or pads that comes out and sounds halfway decent we instantly purchase.
    Akai will eventually fail because it chose to go the consumer route over the pro studio route. And many of us turned into consumer/customers and abandoned the producer/pro studio for do nothing home studios to post music for free on social media (Saturday morning cook ups and look at how pretty my mpc is).
    🤷🏽‍♂️

  • @astrangeandmysteriouspodca7168
    @astrangeandmysteriouspodca7168 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I use all different ways to create music. I have a mpc one, mpc live 2, mpc 2000xl, mpc blk, ni maschine studio, fl studio, cubase pro, reason 10, studio one artist, roland fa06, and korg Nautilus. Enjoy them all. Make em knock.

  • @sergiodeoliveira5358
    @sergiodeoliveira5358 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I started off in the 90s with the built in sequencer on my Yamaha SY55. I have honestly been trying to make the DAW thing work for 20 years and the temptation to open up browser or do other stuff is just too great on the computer. Ableton Live is probably the app that keeps me most engaged. I picked up a Fantom 6 a year ago and the sequencer is OK - such a pain to use Fantom with external gear though. I just bought the MPC One+ a few weeks ago and it feels like I'm back in the zone and just focus on music and being creative. I wish I had figured out how great MPCs are sooner. I'm finally getting into sampling which always seemed like too much work before the MPC.

  • @devious_j
    @devious_j 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. I used both it's good to have options with your creativity .

  • @KhaliqueAmel
    @KhaliqueAmel 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like this,...everything this guy say's is always factual!!! Big up my G!!!!

  • @justinrivera1603
    @justinrivera1603 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    At the end of it is, shouldn’t matter what you use the MPC, or a audio doll. They both do the same thing basically create music. What matters is your ear 😊

  • @40SCARZ
    @40SCARZ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dig what your saying I want a mpc but don't know which one to get😊

  • @machinesworking
    @machinesworking 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The main reason I bought then sold the MPC Live, then bought a Live II is because I've used DAWs forever. I've got over 400 paid for plugins in my VST folder and my home setup is a monster, and the editing on the Mac with Digital Performer is insane. The thing that drew me back is my eternal search for a decent integrated drum machine, Maschine sucks for odd timing. Arturia killed Spark, Beatstep Pro with Battery or some other plugin is alright, but in the end what I wrote with the MPC was just better. Plus stand alone is appealing, being that you use the workflow the MPC was designed for. I have a solid workflow with my DAW and a computer, but things break it, it requires maintenance.

  • @Mojokiss
    @Mojokiss 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this may be good or bad but i have been making music on my MPC ONE for a year and have not used my computer for music the whole time. I'm also a full time musician playing gigs and what not. The MPC ONE is a musical instrument that happens to also be similar to a DAW.

  • @CarpeDiem-311
    @CarpeDiem-311 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Number 10 , the MPC is very portable live music performances! And just simple to take anywhere!

    • @hip360hop
      @hip360hop 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And a laptop isnt?

    • @wm1573
      @wm1573 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hip360hopit sure is but no one wants to make music with keyboard and mouse and painting midi expect trap producers

    • @hip360hop
      @hip360hop 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wm1573 tons of producers of many different genres use their laptop. 9th wonder for example came up using FL - think outside the box my guy

  • @TangoJordan
    @TangoJordan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As someone who's favorite MPC was the 2500, my MPC Uno is everything I ever wanted from Akai. Me and my crew started with the 60mkII, that got stolen. It would be many years until I got the MPC1000, only to have my pads die. I switched to FLStudio and Reason cuz Toomp used to go on about how that was all he ever needed. Nope. Not me. I did use Sony Acid to make my own loops, but I dropped them to the Compact Flash with BPM data. I have always lived in the Akai Workflow, and none of these "improvements" will ever replace it.

  • @markjackman1712
    @markjackman1712 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Video! I have a Live 2 and X, and also FL studio. I agree especially with what youre saying in point 5 - as I use my PC for work, gaming and music its extremely easy for me to become distracted from making music with FL however with the MPCs its like your in your own little bubble just you and the MPC (in standalone I mean of course). I also find with so many plugins in FL its easy (for me) to get a little overwhelmed with choice.

  • @kdaddy100
    @kdaddy100 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a DAW user for many years, I totally agree that the DAWS do t give you the kind of sound and production quality of the MPC if you're producing hip-hop, R & B, trap, etc. DAWS are really good for posy production and mastering, live performance recording. But, because of the issues you mentioned: midi latency, IO etc, the DAWS I've used, Protools, Abelton, Cubase, Logic Pro, Studio 1, all have that same issue of not being able yo tighten all the elements of the sequencing in the home studio. The MPC for the price is worth having for pure musical creation IMO.

  • @Soundninja1994
    @Soundninja1994 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Just got the mpc one + last month it's better imo I been using fl since 07 🤲🏿💎 it's better to arrange and really get immersed into the music imo I prefer to make all my beats in the mpc now I use fl for a my daw 💯🤲🏿💎

  • @ChromeRockwell
    @ChromeRockwell 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You hit the nail on the head 👊🏾💪🏾💪🏾

  • @saskatchewandave
    @saskatchewandave 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video as always. I've gone back and forth on this. Never owned an MPC, but wanted one for like 20 years, lol. I think once stems is fully out, I'm going to cop a MPC ONE. Just for the fact that it's only for beat making and it does that 100%, no latency, no plugin problems, etc..., and not writing emails etc. Can you fully master a track out of the MPC? I always thought that it still had to go through a DAW at some point?

    • @muzikman2008
      @muzikman2008 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah you can master and export a song out on MPC, but I still prefer exporting to my DAW for final mastering. I use multi and compression slot, and better reverbs.

    • @saskatchewandave
      @saskatchewandave 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@muzikman2008 nice. Can you export the tracks out individually to master them?

    • @muzikman2008
      @muzikman2008 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@saskatchewandave yes you can... "explode tracks" is your friend 😎👌

  • @EricJohnson-fh8zj
    @EricJohnson-fh8zj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I came from the mpc 1000, and korg triton LE before that (and 4 track tascam tape before that lol). And i recorded everything on a 16 track Fostex digital recorder. When computer production & recording first started becoming a big thing, i just couldn't get with it. Computers just weren't up to the task yet. Too many glitches, crashes, and waiting around for them to "think" lol. It just broke my creative flow. I liked how my harware just did what you asked it to do. Everytime and without big headaches.
    I finally broke down tho and made the switch about 6 or 7 years ago. Nowadays it doesnt make much sense to do it any other way. And its not practical trying to finish a whole track with vocals on just a grovebox. But i still love the grovebox workflow. I use Maschine to do the bulk of my beatmaking, then transfer the stems over to the DAW for final arrangement/production/mixing and recording. I've just never been able to really get into doing the whole production process in the box (daw). And in the end Maschine ended up being a better choice for me than the MPC was because of the NI vst integration, because i dont do very much record sampling anyways. I will from time to time...but i mostly sample the instruments i play and flip those samples. Maschine makes it easy to do that, and gives me a ton of sound options to build a musical production around my samples.
    And yeah, im that guy that only owns one computer (mackbook m1 pro)...but ONLY use it for music production lol. Nothing else.
    I dont like to take risks infecting or bogging down my computer with garbage thats gonna slow it down. Only time it ever goes online is when i need to upload or update my vst's or DAWs.😮

  • @FromStart2Finish
    @FromStart2Finish 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I utilize both! I create the skeleton of a song with the MPCX as a controller for the MPC Software. I then bounce all my MIDI files to audio. When I'm ready to lay vocals, arrange, mix, and master, I import those MPC audio files into my Studio One DAW for completion. In my opinion, MPCX & Software limits creativity, because so much more can be accomplished by adding a DAW to the process.

  • @dunndoula7373
    @dunndoula7373 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mpc1 and Yamaha montage 🔥 never going back to daw

    • @DETERMINOLOGY
      @DETERMINOLOGY 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ya, The workflow on mpc can not be beat im sorry. Ive seen people say MPC is slower you have to go though 100 different things and its mostly people that doesn't know how to work one as ive seen videos of people flying though the mpc faster then they would in FL studio or DAW

  • @derekstey1875
    @derekstey1875 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the workflow of the Mpc. Some of my best music has been made on it. I personally enjoy it more than using my daw. There is no right or wrong how you produce your music just use what inspires your creation. For me that's the MPC.

  • @CurtisC685
    @CurtisC685 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cognizable is the word you were looking for. Had to look it up myself, didn’t even know that was a word tbh

  • @isaacjones5385
    @isaacjones5385 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I use my MPC2 and with my MPC Key 61 in FLStudio 21. I find that I have more control of my plugins. It’s like using 2 programs in 1, only thing is that it’s hard to get it out of slave mode but I still love both FL Studio and MPC 2

  • @KelaBeats
    @KelaBeats 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I just make stuff for fun, starts in my office, ends in my office. I work completely on my MPC and I love it. A DAW looks intimidating and exhausting.

  • @Carpenter0102
    @Carpenter0102 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Truth is the mpc architecture is ancient and modern daw far surpass it and easily too. The workflow of the mpc and the all in one box appeals to loyal users which is preference and totally understandable

    • @s.gharavi1614
      @s.gharavi1614 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a song writer, MPC is slower and less precise, but it's an actual instrument and production center. DAWs just don't feel right. Souless. Most songs I write with the MPC just come out better. If course, all post is best in DAWs. But for actual composing, DAWs are terrible for most musicians

    • @Carpenter0102
      @Carpenter0102 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@s.gharavi1614 agree on some points but when it comes to cutting edge sound design and modern digital synthesis for electronic productions an mpc isn’t quite there.

    • @Carpenter0102
      @Carpenter0102 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I use both I should say, But for very different purpose

  • @Mr.CireSoprano
    @Mr.CireSoprano 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    IF YOU DIDN'T COME UP IN THE ERA OF THE
    MPC
    ASR-X
    SP1200
    YOU WON'T UNDERSTAND.
    ANYTHING A DAW CAN DO
    I CAN DO ON AN MPC OR ASR-X
    I had to do a lot with a little.
    Too many people are too comfortable going along to get along.
    I use the MPC and the ASR-X
    I also use
    REASON 12 and MASCHINE 2
    I love Reason & Maschine
    I JUST LOVE The MPC and ASR-X
    BETTER 💯👌🏾❗

    • @ant1198
      @ant1198 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I came up during that era…. It’s just I could never afford any of those devices. That stuff was inaccessible to a lot of people because of the price point.

    • @Mr.CireSoprano
      @Mr.CireSoprano 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ant1198 I'm from NYC so the prices probably were a lot cheaper than elsewhere.
      Some reasons were that there were hundreds of recording studios around so after a while you could always catch a really good condition ASR-X or MPC
      for a deep discount at Sam Ash , Manny's or Crocodile Computers and later on Guitar Center.
      However that SP1200 never really came down in price.
      I started working with DAWs back in the late 90s with ProTools ...
      I hated it then and I hate it now.
      I just find it way too expensive to be so freaking complicated.
      Reason for me is a lot better on the stress level. But check this out I've done many projects everybody knows on the radio some time ago with an MPC 2000XL and an Ensoniq ASR-10.
      Nobody cared how I did it They just knew I got them the sound they were looking for.

  • @MusicArtlIfeQ676
    @MusicArtlIfeQ676 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    just wanted to drop a couple of gems about computer based production, one of the biggest problems I used to always have was having too many audio sources enabled, make sure you only have your #1 main audio source enabled in settings (this is why most people, probably 90% have latency). don't use anytype of bluetooth headphones etc, always plug everything in. and the second thing is people always talk about the MPC sounds better, "LEARN HOW TO MIX" because it does sound better at first listen but if you look at the mpc beats software you'll notice the template comes w/ a compressor & air maximizer, that's what causes the sound from mpc's, they are compressing and air maximizing everything so it sounds better, just do that w/ fl studio on your master bus and you have the same type of sound. last of all if you want to hit pads get a midi controller, I use fl studio w/ fl key 37 and an MPC is not f*cking w/ the functionality on NO DAYS, it's literally always more difficult to produce on an mpc, and now akai has integrated mpc beats because they know that. mpc is awesome for LIVE STUFF and VIDEO CONTENT, but not for actual workhorse creation.

    • @JewelzFin
      @JewelzFin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've seen many people produce in a more 'workhorse' on MPCs rather than using a computer. Hell I do that with the Akai Force rather than with a computer. Also, to state that only using a compressor on the master bus is far from correct. Having a compressor on each drum track with their own dedicated attack and release times will greatly improve a production. As well as having all those drum tracks go into a drum bus with its own bus compressor. Where people f up is over compressing everything (squashing). To do so with chord/melodic instrument tracks, just depends on if those need comoression or not. Master bus compression is for gluing everything together for the most part, rather than getting a certain level of attack, release, limiting, etc from each individual track.
      I have everything from a Moog One, Moog Matriarch, Montage to Elektron Analog Rytm, Roland SP 404 and more. So sometimes it's just easier to lay down my ideas very fast on my Force. As well use its cv ports with my synths and other drum machines. And then when I'm done with a great base for the track, then send that over to Logic Pro.
      Everyone has their own way of 'workhorsing'.

    • @MusicArtlIfeQ676
      @MusicArtlIfeQ676 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JewelzFin probably because they computer was trash? computer w/ midi controller is light years faster, and you never have to bounce sh*t. while you bouncing all that sh*t the next guy is on to the next beat, and you misunderstood what I said about compression, I was saying that the mpc beats software has 2 plugins already enabled, they have effects to give you that "MPC" grit/sound that people talk about, all you have to do is enable that on your daw and your good to go then of course you can compress/master further for each instrument. and also again you are kinda jumping to your own conclusion and saying you have a bunch of gear, which the gear is dope, it's just not better or faster than using a computer. alot of the company's stonewall some of the sounds so sometimes you need that gear to get certain sounds, I totally get that aspect of it, and it's not always about being fast either but my main point is nothing is faster about the MPC.

    • @JewelzFin
      @JewelzFin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MusicArtlIfeQ676 it's faster than a computer for many people, just like a computer is faster for a lot of people. Open Labs were the only company I've seen to successfully implement hardware and software together with their Neko and Miko. I had one, but sold it many years ago. But even with that, I'd rather be hardware based for many reasons. Using my outboard Neve preamps and an Elektron Analog Heat on the main outs of my mixer going into my audio interface when I'm recording everything into the box from hardware allows me to barely have to do any mixing at all in the box. Which saves me even more time.
      But on the other hand someone else whos brain works differently, or doesn't have good gear may do so just as fast in the box.
      And with the Force I don't have to bounce if I don't want to. You can create something and just file transfer in seconds. But as stated above, I record in using outboard gear.

  • @drebone1986
    @drebone1986 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man the MPC Live 2 made me realize how many hoops I have to jump thru to do the same things that I never thought about before getting it. Latency all day no matter what I get. Midi controllers that need drivers for each daw that don't support all of the features. Licenses always running a check, free plugins missing when they update to the next generation. I just turn on the MPC, plug in a cable to sample and keep it moving. I rarely have this experience on my gaming desktop in the 20 years I've been doing this as a hobby/eventual business. PC is fun but MPC is mostly painless

  • @rohill5830
    @rohill5830 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Three words:
    Native Instruments Maschine
    Talk about it !!!

  • @Jvaldes609
    @Jvaldes609 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Man I could not agree more I’ve been going through it with my computer 🖥️ not my MPC turn on and go make beats 🎧

  • @sensorycircuits1338
    @sensorycircuits1338 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was thinking about MPC, but I've already spent on an audio interface, hardware synths and a midi controller with pressure sensitive pads & 16 control knobs plus a keyboard. I've decided to push the limits of what I already have. Little difference if I use a touchscreen or a touchpad to switch tracks & hardware synths are knob per function. MPC requires mapping 4 knobs to software synth params & clustering them as pages. MPC might have been a great value proposition back when computers were slow, but things have changed.

  • @bigpl412
    @bigpl412 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At the end of the day, it dont matter what you use... Its about the 🔥🔥🔥 you make with it.

  • @mkII.
    @mkII. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I own both a mpc and a MacBook air m1, I would say it's easier to make a simple track on mpc. A full song with intros, outros, choruses and effects can be done on the mpc. However this is where the computer takes over imo, it's just easier to work on the sequencer grid with a mouse and keyboard vs a wonky touchscreen. Both are amazing tools that compliment each other's strengths and weaknesses.

  • @gand808
    @gand808 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic video. I appreciate your thoughts.

  • @thesynthlord954
    @thesynthlord954 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One thing I really like about MPC over my desktop based setup is having the q-links already pre-mapped to everything.....much easier than having to go in and figure out which controls I want to midi learn....I'll also shout a warning that if you want to produce on laptop stick to 1080p resolution because a good number of plugins are not updated for higher resolutions yet and on a smaller screen that basically makes them unusable (learned that the hard way lol)

  • @xHopshotx
    @xHopshotx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the Akai MPC key 37

  • @sawssman965
    @sawssman965 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm mpc over daw all day but I gotta admit the mpc alone wasn't enough for me. I'd say the average person would greatly benefit from getting a general purpose type synth like a phantom or a modx or something like that. Not necessarily a must, but an extremely welcome plus if you plan on shyting out beat after beat.

  • @AndreHughley
    @AndreHughley 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I didn’t watch the video, but you playing right. Ha ha😂

  • @Bc-ow1ir
    @Bc-ow1ir 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been ableton gang since 09 but recently added an sp 404mk2 to my set up and enjoy the fact that if it sounds good on the headphones it sounds amazing when I play it in the car or on cellphone speakers

  • @pegipoi
    @pegipoi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Making beats on mpc is just plain more fun. 🎉

  • @sorcelord65
    @sorcelord65 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As much as I love fl and use it to this day… I say this all the time. When I turn my mpc on it makes fl sound flat and mpc sounds full out the box.
    And the work flow is actually faster because it’s more focused on creating and doesn’t have a million things they get you off track like fl does.
    Last thing mpc forces you to learn music theory and playing etc if your not a sample based producer.
    I can’t say one is better than the other but they just have their differences

  • @NimbleX-MC
    @NimbleX-MC 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have used Apple computers and Ableton Live and Logic Pro…and then I got my own MPC, and I would never go back to production exclusively on a computer in a DAW. I 100% prefer MPC and hardware synths. I have many pluggins: Falcon, Deva, Serum, Zebra, Brazille, Pigments, and many more; and yes they are great in their own way. For me I’ll take my MOOG Matriarch and Waldorf Iridium; it is just better for what I want to do with it sound and workflow. I love working with samplers: MPC, SP 404 mk2, Polyend Tracker mini, CHOMPI, Teenage Engineering KO2 they are just fun, musical, inspiring and sound great. Also an honorable mention, having a record player has me listening to so much music I would not have listened to or relistened to, I don’t stream music (other than some you tube. But I do buy vinyl at real record stores and in goodwill and any and every place I travel to. So essentially my MPCs and my record player(s) have changed my life.

  • @ChristopherCologneASMR
    @ChristopherCologneASMR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ive never made anything on an mpc (always used a motif) but i think im about to get one... But i absolutely hate making beats on a computer. Making beats in cubase, fruityloops is the most annoying shit. Ill be dead on with my rhythm and no matter what i do my rhythm is always off when im making beats on a computer.

  • @Panorama_Beats
    @Panorama_Beats 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    MPCs make my mixing process a little bit easier, so do analog synthesizers. The sound is just better warmer, sometimes perfectly saturated. I don‘t have to do that much processing on 1 sound, when I‘m working with analog

  • @KingJusHipHop
    @KingJusHipHop 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm definitely gonna get an MPC Live 1. Been practising on my boys Live 1. Love the drum sounds. I'm a heavy logic Pro user. One things for sure tho, AKAI HAS TERRIBLE SUPPORT. I have homies that have a few MPC's each (which is why I'm gonna get one cuz I can get all my questions answered). I recently started using the MPC Beats software, LOL what a mess, 2.13 is full of bugs and crashed my MacBook Pro. Very frustrating if you're coming from any other DAW where you don't have to align multiple screens to make sure your pad plays the sound you loaded and doesn't disappear, LOL. I Think Akai has great sounds but the lack of customer support and poorly laid out software has turned a lot of people against the idea of buying into that. Most producers who own an MPC also have to buy a record player, including the cords, buy records, buy crates etc. It can get expensive. Not to mention storage space for all those crates. I agree with the performance aspect but most music producers I know aren't showing their process on TH-cam, so I don't think that applies to most music makers necessarily, MPC performance fans, 100%. Good video as usual tho.

  • @jsmacks11
    @jsmacks11 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After using a variety of PCs for years, I haven't really ran into latency issues for playing/recording synths.
    Main thing is understanding buffer sizes, ASIO/ASIO4ALL drivers. As long as you ain't using something ancient you should be fine.

  • @HOLLIDAYTRAX
    @HOLLIDAYTRAX 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Using the UAD Volt inputs to PRINT your tracks from the current MPCs into a DAW…Do you hit the ‘vintage’ button on the Volt or not?

  • @BoogieMan206
    @BoogieMan206 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m running a Core i9-13900K with 64 GB of memory. I have Reason 12 and I’m using a MPC One and a Maschine Mikro Mk3 as sound modules.

  • @smackdammit4266
    @smackdammit4266 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a longtime user of both and a owner of a Live mk1 I prefer Ableton Live over all. I’m just faster and have way more options in the DAW but I still get busy on my MP as well. Glad to have both but if I had to choose one it would be Ableton.

  • @risingphoenix1484
    @risingphoenix1484 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I use both...an MPC and a Mac, here is the thing they're both great but no computer sounds like the MPC.

  • @drollins9973
    @drollins9973 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ive had them all (just about) emu sp1200/akai s2000, Maschine, and used FL for a while but alway came back to my MPC. Since the Live came out, I use the MPC a lot because im not fixed to one spot anymore

  • @MarcM143
    @MarcM143 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey man love the video and all the info! Could you turn down the background loop a little though is hard to focus on what your sayin

  • @liveyhuggyman7027
    @liveyhuggyman7027 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honestly i use both...i start my beats on mpc one +...i cannot live without it...i do drums hats bass and melody...then i switch to logic where i add things if i need to...like strings (with native instruments plugins) 😊😊😊

  • @MadaFakaShone
    @MadaFakaShone 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @Ave Mcree EY maan, can you elaborate on the 9th reason? I remember making a sort of a remix song (out of an I think 3 songs from that time) in the Sound Forge, using effects to make blend from that chops from songs more in tune, reverse them and.... Did you do that? It would be cool to make some sort of a retrospective video from your first year of music production/creating

  • @mr.mr.3662
    @mr.mr.3662 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i own the key37 the live2 and MPC one plus happy with all 3 the mpc software is my daw of choice for now

  • @706erRick
    @706erRick 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    💎💎💎 thanks for the clear insight on this... what about CPU issues because Kontakt is a killer of that!?