@nanashi7779 I dropped off at the meme video when they would not let up on Ohio for 10 minutes. I used to be a patreon but they couldn't even upload right at least when I was there. If you like them still go for it, I hopped back because I was hoping they'd have some self reflection, but I guess it was just clickbait
Teaching people basic hygiene and how to clean is so real, when I was 20 yo a friend of mine got a job at a tattoo studio and one of his chores was to clean the bathroom everyday and at first he had no idea because his mom always took care of cleaning in his house.
"Socrates said the 'behold a man' joke right?" - Joey probably I just heard Garnt claim that the Romans invented blowjobs, as an archaeology student that hurt my soul. If we first started milking cows and other domesticated animals THOUSANDS OF YEARS before the Romans, how would it take THAT long for someone to think of BJ's like wtf???
@@ChrisVillagomez yeah the bj comment Romans were the earliest one we know to write about. But I am willing to be other cultures did but it is lost to time.
@@DubhghlasMacDubhghlasI assume you mean the greeks 😂. But yes I’m sure the ancient Egyptians and the Akkadians had their philosophers as well. It seems to be human to think about life when you have time for ut.
@@hortehighwind8651 I was talking about garnt statement on Romans invented BJs. There were philosophers before Socrates. Unsure if other cultures had philosopher before the Greeks. Thales of Miletus is first known philosopher in both west and the east. Eastern is Confucius and Thales beat him about by 50 years.
Garnt: They combine peanut and butter to make peanut butter. Joey: Socrates invented philosophy. These conversations are as deep as the water in a rice field.
If people are still confused about the Monty Hall problem, imagine instead of 3 doors there’s 100 doors now with only one of those being the prize. You choose 1 door with 1/100 probability of getting the prize. The host who knows where the prize is opens 98 doors now, leaving your door with a mystery door. You chose your door with 1/100 probability of being right, but this door that you didn’t choose now has a 99/100 probability of having the prize. The probability of your door locked itself to 1/100, but the new door went from 1/100 to 99/100.
Connor's logic regarding the Monty Hall problem is basically correct. It's a lot more clear if you imagine there are more doors. Suppose there were 100 doors instead of 3. You choose one, they reveal 98 doors to be empty. Now there's two unopened doors, your original choice and one other door, do you switch? Obviously yes.
The issue is people think of the switching of the doors like a coin toss. Switching of the doors represents switching the probabilities around. Initially you had a 1 in 3 chance of being correct and 2 in 3 chance of being wrong. When you are told you can swap you are being told that you can hedge your bets on the fact that you didnt hit the 1 in 3, but rather that you hit the 2 in 3. Therefore making swapping give you a 2 in 3 chance of winning the game every time.
@@TheHirosa yeah the coin toss logic seems intuitively correct but isn't because of the added information of the open door To rephrase what you said in my own words: You have a 1/3 chance of choosing correctly on the first guess and a 2/3 chance of choosing incorrectly. That's obvious. If you always switch, you lose the 1/3 of the time you guessed correctly. But you win the 2/3 of the time your initial guess was incorrect because there were two other options and now it's narrowed down to only one, which must be the correct option because your initial guess was wrong and the other one you didn't guess is the open door.
I've always suspected clapping was an instinctive gesture long before it became a cultural expression, because babies will awkwardly clap their hands when they're excited or having a positive interaction with someone.
Connor inheriting Chris persona is hilarious even tho they're both brit's still funny how he got a entirely new vibe and all of them got way too much energy than normal, they're really not aging.
i feel like this probably gets said like every week, but i think it's crazy how much of a routine tuning in for a trash taste episode has become for me and so many other listeners. i keep catching myself thinking on a thursday night "oh, tomorrow is friday, that means another trash taste episode will be released", and i don't know why but i feel comforted by that fact every single time. just these couple of guys getting together to talk about whatever is on their minds makes me feel like i can get through the week no matter how tough it seemed to be going. it never makes me fail to realize just how important the little things in life are. this comment isn't meant to pressure anyone in the office to work more, but merely an observation i needed to get off my chest. if there's ever a time that anyone on set needs to take a break, please do; episodes can wait, always put yourselves first. but with that being said, thank you guys for being so consistent for so long; i (and likely many others) appreciate it more than you probably think
omg conner saying peanut butter is low in calories followed up by ganrt thinking peanut butter was made with peanuts and butter was some of the best podcast revelations i've ever seen and i'm not even 10mins in. this is gonna be a good ep
Something i don't tolerate anymore is people who drinks until wasted or black out. Like when i was younger i did not care because it was whatever, but now that im older i just wanna have fun and talk. Now people just drink and start shit. Always starting something every time we go out.
Switching in the Monty hall problem gives you a 2/3 to win because let’s split up the problem with a tree diagram. When you first pick your door, you have 1/3 to win, 1/3 to lose and another 1/3 to lose. When you switch, all these outcomes flip so 1/3 to lose, 1/3 to win, and then another 1/3 to win. Thus, switching results in an overall 2/3 to win. If you are just looking at the switching scenario alone without the context of the 3 doors, then it is 1/2 to win or lose but because we have extra information before that, it does alter the chances.
The Monty Hall paradox is one of my favourite problems. As a logical person, it makes so much sense because people overlook the fact that the Monty Hall situation ALWAYS reveals a losing door. In other words, the reason why switching yields a 2/3 chance of winning is because at the very beginning of the problem, you had a 2/3 chance of choosing a losing door.
The Monty Hall Problem becomes easier when you think about the same problem but with 100 doors and the host opening 98 doors. It becomes 99/100 that switching is correct.
Something about this episode banter so far sets it apart from the rest i don’t know why, maybe we've been getting too many prompts (not complaining tho)
Another way to understand the monthy hall problem is to remember that probabilities always sum to 1. So since your original choice stays at 1/3 chances of being right, it has to mean that whatever door is left has 1 - 1/3 = 2/3 chances of being right.
the last stories that Connor and Garnt told reminded me of something on my most recent trip in japan, i was pushing my suitcase on a train platform and i was kinda in a rush cuz i had to meet a friend later and my suitcase wheel either was broken or got caught on something as i was pushing it and i wiped out and fell pretty badly. thankfully i put my hands down so i didnt fall on my face/head but my hand bent back pretty hard and i ripped my tights and not a single person on the platform even asked if i was okay... no one got up or stopped, no one said anything (it wasnt that busy i guess but still) i was so embarrassed too so i just got up and limped to the elevator and recomposed myself in a different area... my hand ended up hurting the next few days and i ended up with a huge bruise on a few spots on my leg from falling too but damn, if that was someone else that i saw fall, i would have definitely gone up and asked them if they were okay and i was kinda sad that no one did that for me
Heres an explanation of the monty hall paradox they were talking about. Let's say there are three doors, and behind them are like the following: Nothing - Prize - Nothing Let's look at all the possibilities. If you choose Door 1, the host must open Door 3, and if you change your choice to Door 2, you win. If you choose Door 2 and decide to change your door, you lose. If you choose Door 3, the host must open Door 1, and if you change your choice to Door 2, you win. As we can see, in all three possibilities where you change your door, you win twice out of the three possibilities. Similarly, let's consider the possibilities where you stick with your initial choice: If you choose Door 1, you lose. If you choose Door 2, you win. If you choose Door 3, you lose. We can clearly see that the strategy of changing your door gives you a higher chance of winning the prize. It's not a 50/50 scenario, but rather a 2/3 probability of winning if you switch doors. When host opens one of the remaining doors, he provides you with a new information. This information is not changing the initial probabilities but telling you that: "The probability of the prize being in one of the 2 doors you did not choose is 66.7% and I am opening one of these doors for you. In the beginning there was a 66.7% probability that the prize was in one of these two doors, and I showed you which of these doors had a nothing." The 33.3% probability was added because of the information the host gave us. Thus, when we change our door, we have a 66.7% probability of winning.
so for monty hall problem, the intuitive way to think about it is that in your first choice you are picking 1/3. On your second selection, you are picking both the wrong door AND the another door. You can say "well I know that that door is wrong" but you are picking two doors instead of just one. I tested this with my family at a game night where we said that if we switched we would either get it right 1/2 of the time or 2/3 and that would tell us which was right and in 15 trials switching was successful 11 times.
Today is my 26th birthday, and for the most part of this year I confidently said "I'm 26..." to a bunch of people, then remembering and finishing with "...in a few months", sounding totally like a child 😭😭😭
With the Monty Hall problem, there is a 1/3 chance your first guess is right, and a 2/3 chance that your guess is wrong. Also, because there are 2 empty doors and you are only picking 1 door, there is always at least 1 empty door that you didn't pick. Because of that, when the host opens a door that is empty and that you didn't pick, you don't gain any new information, and so the probabilities around your guess don't change.
Quick note on the monty hall paradox. It’s a lot easier to understand with a larger sample. Basically when you initially the odds you picked right is 1/X and the odds you picked wrong are X-1/X. Once they remove all the other doors swapping gives you the odds of X-1/X Ex. Picking with 1000 doors Youre right: 1/1000 You’re wrong: 999/1000 If you swap you now have a 99.9% chance of being right as it was extremely unlikely you picked right in the first place.
For the Monty Hall paradox, if you increase the number of doors to 10 it might make a bit more sense. You increase the odds of the switching of doors to a 9/10 chance because you remove all incorrect doors and you have your initial pick to being with.
The mushroom: You change over time. Your ideas, taste, body, everything. Keep giving things a chance, a 2nd, 3rd, 4th time. Don't solidify into an immovable person that shuts things down forever.
19:28 I had a class in highschool that was a study hall but the first 15-20 minutes was teaching us how to manage all our schoolwork, how to prioritize assignments, how to use a planner and calender, how to email teachers, ect. and it was honestly the most helpful class I've ever had
Scenario 1: you picked the wrong door. Judge reveals a different wrong door. Correct choice is to switch. Scenario 2: you picked the other wrong door. Judge reveals a different wrong door. Correct choice is to switch. Scenario 3: you picked the correct door. Judge reveals a wrong door. Correct choice is to stay. In two of those three scenarios, the correct choice is to switch. Also, what’s more likely? You picked the correct door the first choice and not the second choice? Extrapolate the question. You have a deck of 52 cards. You need to draw the ace of spades. You draw. The judge reveals 50 cards and leaves two, he asks if you want to switch. Is it more likely that you drew the correct card or that he just went through the deck and turned over all the cards except the one you picked and the ace of spades.
you got to learn to love the crunch - basically either you do what you love but sometimes you just need to make yourself love what you do since the former is not always possible. Basically gaslight yourself into liking doing what you don't want to do but you need to do it since it's necessary.
Fashion magazines. Before youtube there were printed instructions with photos. There were some makeup artists who would make training tapes. You could also go to a department store makeup counter. They would give you a makeover and sell you products.
The Monty Hall problem makes sense because you can't remove the winning door. They have to remove a losing door & they can't remove your door. There's a 1/3 chance you picked the winning door & if you swap you lose, if you don't you win. There's a 2/3 chance you picked a losing door & if you swap you win because a losing door had to be removed before you get the choice to swap.
Easy way to understand the monty hall paradox: If we don't switch our only win is if we chose the right door initially which has probability of 1/3. If we do switch we win every time we *don't* chose the right door first which has probability of 2/3.
When I was in high school (Ohio) we'd have multiple group projects per semester with a mandatory presentation in front of our class (as in everyone in that grade) It was to force us to interact, cooperate, and speak in front of large groups. Hated it at the time, but it did make presenting in uni a breeze and I'm not afraid of talking to strangers at all so I guess it worked lol
For the Monty Hall problem, if you didn't guess right in the first place, which is a 67% chance, then switching gets you that 67% chance. Let's say you first guess door 1 and the host reveals door 2. In the actual Monty Hall problem, we're assuming the host wouldn't reveal the door that you guessed first. If that's the case, then the fact that the door they revealed wasn't the door you selected isn't significant. Meanwhile, the fact that they didn't reveal door 3 is significant. The only way it's a 50/50 is if the host had the ability to reveal the door you selected first. If they reveal the door you guess, it's obviously a 50/50. If they reveal another door, then the fact that they didn't reveal the door you guessed is just as statistically significant as the fact that they didn't reveal the third door.
The door stuff: You choose a door The choice you made is 1/3 The choice you didnt make is 2/3 When the one door is opened the choice you didnt make still has a 2/3 chance, which is the leftover door. So you switch.
" This episode is gonna be deep ."
(14 minute tangent of peanut butter, $700 juicers, and headphones ensues)
It went deep though.
@@ausreir I'm not sitting through 30 minutes of deflection for that
@@personname1008 is this your first time listening? If not, I'm surprised you haven't figured out what this podcast is about already
@nanashi7779 I dropped off at the meme video when they would not let up on Ohio for 10 minutes. I used to be a patreon but they couldn't even upload right at least when I was there. If you like them still go for it, I hopped back because I was hoping they'd have some self reflection, but I guess it was just clickbait
Joey absolutely losing it dealing with 2 children is one of the funniest shit I've ever seen
Not even 5 min into the episode 😅
Timestamp?
@@gutzz1519the whole video
@@gutzz1519 0:00 - 2:05:05
I’m glad the boys went from hating on Americans to all finding their American significant others.
Joey&Aki
Garnt&Sydney
Connor&Ludwig
I mean even if they're not partners. Mousey is still Puerto Rican. Which is part of the US right?
Yup!@@charapresscott7750
@@charapresscott7750 Si
Joey and Grant have had theirs from the jump of TT. It took Connor a few years to find his American Pride.
@@charapresscott7750True. But find me a Native Puerto Rican that doesn't hate Americans and that'll be a day hell freezes over.
Connor asking Joey for a new shirt had the energy of a kid talking to his parents.
and Joey and Connor telling Garnt to put the rubiks cube down lol
This feels like the episode with the most tangents because the boys are trying so hard to avoid the deep questions lol. Love it
Connor having a sugar high is the greatest thing I’ve ever seen 😂
Honestly!!!
Teaching people basic hygiene and how to clean is so real, when I was 20 yo a friend of mine got a job at a tattoo studio and one of his chores was to clean the bathroom everyday and at first he had no idea because his mom always took care of cleaning in his house.
Given Joeys take on socrates inventing philosophy I'm gonna approach this episode with caution
"Socrates said the 'behold a man' joke right?" - Joey probably
I just heard Garnt claim that the Romans invented blowjobs, as an archaeology student that hurt my soul. If we first started milking cows and other domesticated animals THOUSANDS OF YEARS before the Romans, how would it take THAT long for someone to think of BJ's like wtf???
@@ChrisVillagomez yeah the bj comment Romans were the earliest one we know to write about. But I am willing to be other cultures did but it is lost to time.
APPROACH EVERY EPISODE WITH CAUTION
@@DubhghlasMacDubhghlasI assume you mean the greeks 😂. But yes I’m sure the ancient Egyptians and the Akkadians had their philosophers as well. It seems to be human to think about life when you have time for ut.
@@hortehighwind8651 I was talking about garnt statement on Romans invented BJs.
There were philosophers before Socrates. Unsure if other cultures had philosopher before the Greeks. Thales of Miletus is first known philosopher in both west and the east. Eastern is Confucius and Thales beat him about by 50 years.
Garnt: They combine peanut and butter to make peanut butter.
Joey: Socrates invented philosophy.
These conversations are as deep as the water in a rice field.
If people are still confused about the Monty Hall problem, imagine instead of 3 doors there’s 100 doors now with only one of those being the prize.
You choose 1 door with 1/100 probability of getting the prize.
The host who knows where the prize is opens 98 doors now, leaving your door with a mystery door.
You chose your door with 1/100 probability of being right, but this door that you didn’t choose now has a 99/100 probability of having the prize.
The probability of your door locked itself to 1/100, but the new door went from 1/100 to 99/100.
Holy shit, butter added to pb??? I am absolutely flabbergasted by the ignorance 😂
I know, right! I often smh with these podcasts but this is the first to make me want to comment. 🤦♀️
I mean why is it called peanut butter and nut peanut PASTE
Connor's logic regarding the Monty Hall problem is basically correct. It's a lot more clear if you imagine there are more doors. Suppose there were 100 doors instead of 3. You choose one, they reveal 98 doors to be empty. Now there's two unopened doors, your original choice and one other door, do you switch? Obviously yes.
The issue is people think of the switching of the doors like a coin toss. Switching of the doors represents switching the probabilities around. Initially you had a 1 in 3 chance of being correct and 2 in 3 chance of being wrong. When you are told you can swap you are being told that you can hedge your bets on the fact that you didnt hit the 1 in 3, but rather that you hit the 2 in 3. Therefore making swapping give you a 2 in 3 chance of winning the game every time.
@@TheHirosa yeah the coin toss logic seems intuitively correct but isn't because of the added information of the open door
To rephrase what you said in my own words:
You have a 1/3 chance of choosing correctly on the first guess and a 2/3 chance of choosing incorrectly. That's obvious. If you always switch, you lose the 1/3 of the time you guessed correctly. But you win the 2/3 of the time your initial guess was incorrect because there were two other options and now it's narrowed down to only one, which must be the correct option because your initial guess was wrong and the other one you didn't guess is the open door.
connor at the start of the episode reminds me of a kid the month before christmas who just be asking for shit for his list
I've always suspected clapping was an instinctive gesture long before it became a cultural expression, because babies will awkwardly clap their hands when they're excited or having a positive interaction with someone.
25 minutes in. The deepest thing has been:
Taxes
Bitches
Internetsecurity in school into
Ad segment about ExpressVPN
This episode is looking like a banger bc the lengths these boys are going to not answer the questions is content the world has never seen.
Connor inheriting Chris persona is hilarious even tho they're both brit's still funny how he got a entirely new vibe and all of them got way too much energy than normal, they're really not aging.
I just like whenever they do the Chris or Connor voice with each other ."Hurumph What is this!?"
@@Che1seabluesdrogba11 yep true, so unbeatable combination.
Speaking of aging, did you know Chris and Garnt are the same age?
@@quandaIedingIei thought that was a joke tho, Thanks for the info, even tho i watch them all these years om.
@@SociaICancer the difference is Garnt is a n Asian 34 while Chris is a British 34
proof complaining about everything makes you age faster
Just love how unhinged Connor was in the first four minutes
Them saying Connor doesn’t have an American partner like Ludwig isn’t just waiting for his pookie to get home and video call him 🥺
we eating good today
We eat trash taste
We laughing, clapping, and the blowing profession today.
🍕😛
Agreed
i feel like this probably gets said like every week, but i think it's crazy how much of a routine tuning in for a trash taste episode has become for me and so many other listeners. i keep catching myself thinking on a thursday night "oh, tomorrow is friday, that means another trash taste episode will be released", and i don't know why but i feel comforted by that fact every single time. just these couple of guys getting together to talk about whatever is on their minds makes me feel like i can get through the week no matter how tough it seemed to be going. it never makes me fail to realize just how important the little things in life are.
this comment isn't meant to pressure anyone in the office to work more, but merely an observation i needed to get off my chest. if there's ever a time that anyone on set needs to take a break, please do; episodes can wait, always put yourselves first. but with that being said, thank you guys for being so consistent for so long; i (and likely many others) appreciate it more than you probably think
When Connor was saying that Peanutbutter was low on calories, I knew this was going to be a goated episode.
connor in the first half hour of this episode had me crying
Wow, the beginning of this episode is so high in energy and they already fact checking stuff about bullcrap they thought that might be correct. 😂😂
Joey being the dad of the two is hilarous to me 15:29
omg conner saying peanut butter is low in calories followed up by ganrt thinking peanut butter was made with peanuts and butter was some of the best podcast revelations i've ever seen and i'm not even 10mins in. this is gonna be a good ep
Something i don't tolerate anymore is people who drinks until wasted or black out. Like when i was younger i did not care because it was whatever, but now that im older i just wanna have fun and talk. Now people just drink and start shit. Always starting something every time we go out.
Garnt so confidently wrong with peanut butter being butter and peanuts combined. Is astounding.
Switching in the Monty hall problem gives you a 2/3 to win because let’s split up the problem with a tree diagram. When you first pick your door, you have 1/3 to win, 1/3 to lose and another 1/3 to lose. When you switch, all these outcomes flip so 1/3 to lose, 1/3 to win, and then another 1/3 to win. Thus, switching results in an overall 2/3 to win. If you are just looking at the switching scenario alone without the context of the 3 doors, then it is 1/2 to win or lose but because we have extra information before that, it does alter the chances.
Imagine the whole episode them avoiding the topic of the episode LOL
I can't tell you how relieved I was when Garnt finally recalled the word "intuitive", I was like that meme of the sweating kid with the forehead veins
The starting 30 mins of this episode: 😆
The rest of it:💀
20:58
Joey:*Unintentionally makes a valid point*
Grant and Connor: *Affirmative noises*
Joey: STFU!!
"Our deepest episode yet" also called as "Connor truly avoiding starting their deepest episode yet"
The Monty Hall paradox is one of my favourite problems. As a logical person, it makes so much sense because people overlook the fact that the Monty Hall situation ALWAYS reveals a losing door. In other words, the reason why switching yields a 2/3 chance of winning is because at the very beginning of the problem, you had a 2/3 chance of choosing a losing door.
The Monty Hall Problem becomes easier when you think about the same problem but with 100 doors and the host opening 98 doors. It becomes 99/100 that switching is correct.
Something about this episode banter so far sets it apart from the rest i don’t know why, maybe we've been getting too many prompts (not complaining tho)
I need this type of Connor energy every episode. Bro is giving that American energy
"Guns don't kill people, rappers do!" is literally a quote froma goldie looking chain song
The immediate tangent is incredible
Another way to understand the monthy hall problem is to remember that probabilities always sum to 1. So since your original choice stays at 1/3 chances of being right, it has to mean that whatever door is left has 1 - 1/3 = 2/3 chances of being right.
the last stories that Connor and Garnt told reminded me of something on my most recent trip in japan, i was pushing my suitcase on a train platform and i was kinda in a rush cuz i had to meet a friend later and my suitcase wheel either was broken or got caught on something as i was pushing it and i wiped out and fell pretty badly. thankfully i put my hands down so i didnt fall on my face/head but my hand bent back pretty hard and i ripped my tights and not a single person on the platform even asked if i was okay... no one got up or stopped, no one said anything (it wasnt that busy i guess but still) i was so embarrassed too so i just got up and limped to the elevator and recomposed myself in a different area... my hand ended up hurting the next few days and i ended up with a huge bruise on a few spots on my leg from falling too
but damn, if that was someone else that i saw fall, i would have definitely gone up and asked them if they were okay and i was kinda sad that no one did that for me
Heres an explanation of the monty hall paradox they were talking about.
Let's say there are three doors, and behind them are like the following:
Nothing - Prize - Nothing
Let's look at all the possibilities.
If you choose Door 1, the host must open Door 3, and if you change your choice to Door 2, you win.
If you choose Door 2 and decide to change your door, you lose.
If you choose Door 3, the host must open Door 1, and if you change your choice to Door 2, you win.
As we can see, in all three possibilities where you change your door, you win twice out of the three possibilities.
Similarly, let's consider the possibilities where you stick with your initial choice:
If you choose Door 1, you lose.
If you choose Door 2, you win.
If you choose Door 3, you lose.
We can clearly see that the strategy of changing your door gives you a higher chance of winning the prize. It's not a 50/50 scenario, but rather a 2/3 probability of winning if you switch doors. When host opens one of the remaining doors, he provides you with a new information. This information is not changing the initial probabilities but telling you that:
"The probability of the prize being in one of the 2 doors you did not choose is 66.7% and I am opening one of these doors for you. In the beginning there was a 66.7% probability that the prize was in one of these two doors, and I showed you which of these doors had a nothing."
The 33.3% probability was added because of the information the host gave us. Thus, when we change our door, we have a 66.7% probability of winning.
idk how to explain but the VIBES in this episode are so great
so for monty hall problem, the intuitive way to think about it is that in your first choice you are picking 1/3. On your second selection, you are picking both the wrong door AND the another door. You can say "well I know that that door is wrong" but you are picking two doors instead of just one. I tested this with my family at a game night where we said that if we switched we would either get it right 1/2 of the time or 2/3 and that would tell us which was right and in 15 trials switching was successful 11 times.
Man advertising your weaknesses to the internet. Bold move
Today is my 26th birthday, and for the most part of this year I confidently said "I'm 26..." to a bunch of people, then remembering and finishing with "...in a few months", sounding totally like a child 😭😭😭
I think Connor should have a muffin every episode 😂
Garnt’s rival Joey
Joey’s rival Apari
Conner’s rival Daisuke Ono
Is it tradition now for someone to spill their drink on their shirt every episode now? lol.
Grant had the same confusion about the thanksgiving thing in an afterdark episode.
With the Monty Hall problem, there is a 1/3 chance your first guess is right, and a 2/3 chance that your guess is wrong. Also, because there are 2 empty doors and you are only picking 1 door, there is always at least 1 empty door that you didn't pick. Because of that, when the host opens a door that is empty and that you didn't pick, you don't gain any new information, and so the probabilities around your guess don't change.
This episode feels like they prerecorded their own parts individually and put them together into 1 video
Quick note on the monty hall paradox. It’s a lot easier to understand with a larger sample. Basically when you initially the odds you picked right is 1/X and the odds you picked wrong are X-1/X. Once they remove all the other doors swapping gives you the odds of X-1/X
Ex. Picking with 1000 doors
Youre right: 1/1000
You’re wrong: 999/1000
If you swap you now have a 99.9% chance of being right as it was extremely unlikely you picked right in the first place.
holy shit, connor this episode is literally the "cake is just fancy bread" man again LOL
The most manic trash taste episode to date and Im here for it
For the Monty Hall paradox, if you increase the number of doors to 10 it might make a bit more sense. You increase the odds of the switching of doors to a 9/10 chance because you remove all incorrect doors and you have your initial pick to being with.
Garnt: "What is humor?"
Me: "We are the humor, the joke. Wait a minute, jokes have meaning."
I never seen Connor so happy and interactive..who knew..muffins were the answer 😂
He claims peanut butter is low in calories. He truly is American.
There's no way they thought peanut butter is actually peanuts mixed with butter lmao
1:46 "I'm not saying i'm American, i'm just saying i'm right."
Is such a mood and a quote
Garnt is really trying to avoid the questions, but still gives the most cool answers,
Btw the mushroom story is wildly cool
The mushroom: You change over time. Your ideas, taste, body, everything. Keep giving things a chance, a 2nd, 3rd, 4th time.
Don't solidify into an immovable person that shuts things down forever.
Made me sad to here garnt say he think he's boring while I've never met him I'm sure he's quite fun to be around ❤
Never forget Garnt thought peanut butter was actual butter…
Connor didn't find the American in himself, he found it in his boyfriend Ludwig
Bro thought peanut butter was low in calories 🤣
Connor 200 years ago: "Scurvy is not an illness"
19:28 I had a class in highschool that was a study hall but the first 15-20 minutes was teaching us how to manage all our schoolwork, how to prioritize assignments, how to use a planner and calender, how to email teachers, ect. and it was honestly the most helpful class I've ever had
Scenario 1: you picked the wrong door. Judge reveals a different wrong door. Correct choice is to switch.
Scenario 2: you picked the other wrong door. Judge reveals a different wrong door. Correct choice is to switch.
Scenario 3: you picked the correct door. Judge reveals a wrong door. Correct choice is to stay.
In two of those three scenarios, the correct choice is to switch.
Also, what’s more likely? You picked the correct door the first choice and not the second choice?
Extrapolate the question. You have a deck of 52 cards. You need to draw the ace of spades. You draw. The judge reveals 50 cards and leaves two, he asks if you want to switch. Is it more likely that you drew the correct card or that he just went through the deck and turned over all the cards except the one you picked and the ace of spades.
I love how connor basically got the monty hall paradox immediately but the others kept explaining it until he wasn't sure anymore.
Ah, my dose of Trash Taste, right on time. I needed a pick me up today!
you got to learn to love the crunch - basically either you do what you love but sometimes you just need to make yourself love what you do since the former is not always possible. Basically gaslight yourself into liking doing what you don't want to do but you need to do it since it's necessary.
Cant believe garnt remembered what Lily said about relevancy in their guest episode.
Fashion magazines. Before youtube there were printed instructions with photos. There were some makeup artists who would make training tapes. You could also go to a department store makeup counter. They would give you a makeover and sell you products.
The Monty Hall problem makes sense because you can't remove the winning door. They have to remove a losing door & they can't remove your door. There's a 1/3 chance you picked the winning door & if you swap you lose, if you don't you win. There's a 2/3 chance you picked a losing door & if you swap you win because a losing door had to be removed before you get the choice to swap.
Anyone else Felt the need to listen to the song “calling” from the world ends with you OST after finishing this episode?
Peanut butter as a combination of peanut and butter is crazy. Gonna be a banger episode!
Parasocial Andys lets gooo what a feast for us
Connor had such feral energy 😂
Easy way to understand the monty hall paradox:
If we don't switch our only win is if we chose the right door initially which has probability of 1/3.
If we do switch we win every time we *don't* chose the right door first which has probability of 2/3.
The boys are bankrupting Joey's Company. Let's Go! 😂😂
Gottta love that thumbnail with the monke lost in thought xD
I love the kermit the frog plush thumbnail. I laughed so hard.
Todays peanut butter segment is going in the awardw for this year
Garnt is like an alien trying to understanding humans 😂
I am so glad I clicked to watch this while I was buying a muffin from the bakery lmao
i had to keep rewinding because the first 3 mins of this ep had me laughing too much, connor sugar rush too funny
When I was in high school (Ohio) we'd have multiple group projects per semester with a mandatory presentation in front of our class (as in everyone in that grade)
It was to force us to interact, cooperate, and speak in front of large groups. Hated it at the time, but it did make presenting in uni a breeze and I'm not afraid of talking to strangers at all so I guess it worked lol
im not gonna lie, idk what I thought peanut butter was but I didn't think peanuts mixed with butter lol
love your channel bro.
we are back
Ok a real note, that humor question actually blew my mind.
For the Monty Hall problem, if you didn't guess right in the first place, which is a 67% chance, then switching gets you that 67% chance.
Let's say you first guess door 1 and the host reveals door 2. In the actual Monty Hall problem, we're assuming the host wouldn't reveal the door that you guessed first. If that's the case, then the fact that the door they revealed wasn't the door you selected isn't significant. Meanwhile, the fact that they didn't reveal door 3 is significant.
The only way it's a 50/50 is if the host had the ability to reveal the door you selected first. If they reveal the door you guess, it's obviously a 50/50. If they reveal another door, then the fact that they didn't reveal the door you guessed is just as statistically significant as the fact that they didn't reveal the third door.
Apple butter also doesn't have butter in it
10 minutes in and they've already derailed into 5 different tangents. I love this podcast.
I laughed so hard that the first 14 minutes is them actively trying to avoid going on topic
The door stuff:
You choose a door
The choice you made is 1/3
The choice you didnt make is 2/3
When the one door is opened the choice you didnt make still has a 2/3 chance, which is the leftover door. So you switch.
Classes on "how to talk to people" exist, we actually have such disciplines in universities now (at least in my country)
Why do they make it sound like every American is super open about emotions 😂
I know, maybe people only from the South are friendly, everybody else is pretty cold like the British.