Canada is a Constitutional Monarchy (where each individual has the right to be free) with a democratic form of government. The individual does not have to give his consent to be governed and can remain free if one understands what is going on. There is no constitution in Canada that involves the people, what is in place delegates the authority of each government. So if you know how to stay outside of the jurisdiction of the governments, you remain free. Free is defined to be under lo legal restraint. So don't feel bad if you don;t get it, all the public actors lie to private individuals so they can steal their labour, time and property.
Native born state national is the one that can remain outside of the corporate governments and stand on the constitutional state called the Dominion of Canada.
Just wondering why no mention of Section 33 of Charter of Rights and Freedoms that allows Government to deny us our Charter Rights any time they want. What use is a Charter of Rights if it allows the DENIAL of RIGHTS?
Section 33 allows the denial of the Charter Rights when necessary, such as restricting mobility rights during a pandemic in order to cease the spread. Without the ability to deny rights, the government wouldn't really have the power to enforce a restriction without someone pulling up and saying " Ayo the charter says ( insert ) so I can do this and you are infringing on my rights!' Y'know?
My mother in law got rejected a job from the BC government because according to them she was “not the skin colour they were looking for” The pandemic also abolished every single Canadians rights. You can’t just declare a state of emergency which then eliminates every Canadians rights. The same thing happened in WWII in USA where Japanese Americans rights (as laid our per the constitution) were ignored because there was an “emergency” at the time. They were then put into internment camps and it was justified” If our rights don’t hold up when times get tough then we never even had them to begin with.
A woman in Canada if she does not have the responsibility can adopt out her child. Her right and choice. But a father if he does not have the responsibility does not have this right and choice. Equal rights should work equally in Canada, but this is not the case. Fathers in Canada face extreme bias and have no rights or equality.. This needs to be addressed…
Young lady this is so misleading. You need to take a good long look at what happened in toronto many years ago during the g20 conference. The gov actions were the exact opposite of what they put on that peice of paper. Check it out and then ask your teacher about it.
I believe the charter of rights should include the freedom of unwilling participancy, what I mean by this, if you believe your taxes are supporting a war that you don't believe should be waged, you don't have to support it with your tax dollars. I also believe there should be a people's court that overrides the supreme court, and is only voted in by the people instead of appointed by the government. These things will result in a more free society, and gives us more power as individuals. However the unwilling participany needs some rules, but would result in less prison sentences for victimless crimes, such as drug use, more rehab facilities instead and less aggressive wars which means a better homeland defense of our country.
Hi Tyler, if you want to have sovereignty, I can show you the way. It is possible. Read the definition of armorial bearing in the publication called "A Crown of Maples" published by Heritage Canada. This status is what is called a freeman of the realm in England. I would post some links to help you, but youtube keeps deleting my information to help others fight the communist takeover through public policy. If you reach out to me with an email address I can send you the information you need to understand to be free or under no legal restraint in Canada.
I've been looking for an interesting way to learn about canadian politics, and not be brutally ignorant on such an important topic, and I've finally found it! You guys rock! Why is Nova Scotia so big on all of your maps? Is it important to democracy and whatnot, or are you just Nova Scotian?
Are rights arn't rights there privileges that the government allows us at least until such time as it interferes with something the government wants to do to us then they simply refer to the small print
Good video. I just want to clarify something that is not accurate in it. In Cuba there is no absence of "SOME" of these rights; in Cuba, there is an absence of ALL of these rights. As a matter of fact, all the rights mentioned in this video, without exception, have been disrespected in Cuba since day 1 of the Castro regime. I thank the creators of this video for mentioning Cuba as THE example of a regime that disrespects human and international rights and gets away with it.
It could be like a bicycle that is too standardized as well. One with only pedals and not a rowing or recumbent design that enables those with disabilities to also use the bicycle. Some people just can't afford the basic maintenance costs. Some people need a bicycle that can overcome difficult terrain. Some people live in a figurative mud bog. Those people need a bicycle that can also be a boat aka a paddle boat. So democracy must be flexible and adaptive according to individual circumstances. Democracy must continuously evolve to provide equality when new perspectives and circumstances arise. Because the utility of democracy is only provided equally when the metaphorical bicycle or constitutional law enables each individual to participate freely. It is direct oppression to make protesting from a vehicle illegal. Given that the majority of people can't afford to travel and pay for hotels. It is cold enough to require a heater almost 8 months of the year. Which means that any law prohibiting individuals from using a vehicle as a place to stay throughout the course of assembly for a protest is also prohibiting participation in free assembly and free expression. If people are restricted to protest only when weather permits outdoor sleeping in conditions similar to homelessness then controversial policies can be passed during the cold season without public discourse. Similarly, many people work seasonal jobs. The majority of work comes during warmer weather when conditions are more suitable for outdoor projects and schools, aka rental properties, are in turnover season. Thus, it is imperative that freedom of assembly is provided to people who must work seasonal jobs during the off season. Since people working seasonal jobs also have limited income. They cannot afford to stay at hotels or other accommodations. Especially when the policy in question effects their ability to generate income period. Many people live in poverty. Those people need a voice to address the needs in their communities. Things like grocery stores, schools, parks, public infrastructure, public transit, drinking water quality, special needs, counselling services, and much more. All too often the wealthy neighborhood gets funding for a new park or a new school and there is no incentive for a grocery store franchise to open in the low income area. The gap grows wider and wider. So much so that even if we could provide a voice to all those in need at this moment they would not even possess the faculties to adequately express themselves. That is how poverty effects the body and the mind; aside from things like lead contamination in drinking water from outdated infrastructure ties. Linked to developmental delays, learning disabilities, skeletal disfigurement, and brain cancer. So even if they had a voice it would not be able to explain what is wrong or what they need. Without a universal fundamental foundation to start from people cannot have equal opportunity. With a solid foundation the outcome can then be determined fairly and on equal footing. Maybe the outcome won't be equal; it will be more balanced than it is in our current state. Nutrition and a clean environment provide the spark needed to motivate individuals over obstacles such as mental health into productive careers that provide some disposable income and the ability to control one's destiny to an extent by managing your own affairs within your own family estate. It's not the perfect life of a homestead living off the land, but at least a real opportunity for families to choose that route or at least get some satisfaction in the process of developing their own individual property and assets. Also, something needs to account for people who were not gifted land in the past. If we can prove our family heritage has never received a free parcel of land from the government then we should be granted an equal portion of land today as reparations. Likewise, any new land purchased using the equity of previously inherited free land should be forfeit and distributed to those with no land. Especially that land and equity gained from the fruits of the land such as forestry and farming.
An aspect of its history, such as how a specific section came to be included? How one or more sections have been considered and interpreted by the courts?
You've mixed up your cases in regards to the anti-semitic teacher in New Brunswick. It was Keegstra in Eckville, Alberta who was a Socials teacher who actively taught hatred of Jews in the classroom. The New Brunswick teacher was a Math teacher who never brought his views into the classroom. He had specifically denied the Holocaust and and wrote on the issue as a private citizen, not a teacher. The Keegstra case was more open and shut. The Match teacher defended his opinions on the basis that his views were protected by his Charter rights. The courts, I think, didn't overrule his freedom of expression rights, but held that removing him from the classroom as a teacher was acceptable because he could be held to higher standards as a teacher. As a teacher, Jewish students had to feel comfortable in his classroom.
The third way of changing the charter is to ignore the rights and freedoms with the "Not Withstanding Clause". I lived in Quebec under bill 101 so you forgot to mention that any rights and freedoms under the Charter are wholly conditional. What Governments give you, they can take away.
Thank you for having an actual artist using a whiteboard. I genuinely hate seeing the disembodied hand that draws in clip art. I love the style they have. Does the artist have a link to their work, I'd love to check out their gallery :D
We need to learn about the UDHR in order to really understand the CCRF. Our domestic laws have to fall in line with the International Covenant because Canada is a signatory to it and is under obligation and duty to recognize and protect human rights and freedoms. One very important thing about the CCRF is to know of the 3 different designations. There is a difference between Everyone, Citizen and Legal Person when reading the CCRF. If we are not aware, we can limit our rights and freedoms by taking on the legal person. A human being gets his or her rights from God and are born with them. Persons get their rights and freedoms prescribed by the government. Always stand as a man or woman, not a person or legal fiction.
I like the pictures being drawn, they definitely help explain what's being said. Good job. They also kinda remind me of the pictures Mr. Dress Up would draw back on the day. 👍
+Stiverton Why the Federal Government of course....the Prime Minister's Office to be exact. and yes I do have a far more cynical view of the Charter, The Courts and Politicians
It would take alot to change the Charter. You need 7 Provinces and 50% of the Canadian population to agree. The prime minister can try but more than likely won't happen.
Knowledge does. It is how you sign agreements with the government agencies that determine whether they can use public policy against you or not. You have been made a secret agent through the birth certificate which is evidence a crown organization was organized and this is why you must understand what is going on. You can stop consenting to be governed with the stroke of a pen. Just like you can consent to be governed with the stroke of a pen. Lack of knowledge.
If you still care, I think it's mainly that they are made and changed by their respective level of government. A province cannot change a federal law (on its own), and the federal government cannot (for the most part) change provincial laws. The same thing applies to the municipal level as well. Of course, its more complicated than this (it always is) but that's the gist of it.
You only have these rights and freedoms until Section 33 of the Constitution Act 1982, the "NOT WITH STANDING CLAUSE" is enacted, then all these can be thrown out and you no longer have any. This person is trying to make it sound good but he doesn't tell you about the powers both provincial and federal governments have in that one section. Although what is said in this video is mostly true, it doesn't paint the whole truth.
If you believe this, you really need to look at the document and what is said here much more critically. Within the first minute it is mentioned that free and fair elections can't be held without rights and freedoms. That is obviously not true. The other point is the subjectivity of "fair". What is ,"fair" to one person is unjust to another. In fact, this is usually the case: those who benefit most find it fair and those disadvantaged most find it unfair. Finally, practically the entire charter is "subject to" restrictions. This makes it a charter of "Limited Privileges" not a "Charter of Rights".
I'm using some information from this in part, for my paper about the Candian Constitution and a dispute about certain details of the "Indian act". Do you have a formal source I could cite? perhaps even yourself? Thanks, it's appreciated.
what is the difference between the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms and the declaration of the rights of man and citizen ..... like Canadian government and American government
So explain to me why the charter applies in some provinces but not in others. Living in Quebec there seems to be a lot of rights that we don't have but those of other provinces do have , is it because Canada and Quebec are two different countries with the same money.
I in my experience we have no access to human rights and freedoms, we are taught we are protected . But depending on income and legal aid resources, it may not be accessible to low income earners. Per your charts human rights commission does not investigate all issues and thefore this is not applicable to all human rights cases. Access to law or representation in a poverty situation in my experience is not possible. Their are gaps in our process to gain access. We are not seeing the fine print or excludsions of individuals or the claims its self
I work securty, but because of the great authoritarian power that is rising up from this pandemic, it looks like very soon they may have me checking for jab passports for businesses, if I have to force segregation and discrimination between the jabbed, and the un-jabbed, I will decline that kind of work, I will not be used as an authoritarian tool. I believe preserving our human rights and freedoms are far more important for our future generations.
So in court does the charter supersede other laws ... like the right for police to enter your home on a suspicion without a warrant as could happen with the new impaired driving laws which totally violate our rights and have they been challenged?
does the first rights of the charter include the right to being a parent and not be denied this because of financial class or being seen as an easy target by other members of society.?????
Awesome to have.. Only part I dont agree with is giving opportunities to someone based on skin color and ethnic history as opposed to the best man or woman for the job. Tired of cultural appropriation. I don't owe anybody squat. Everyone is eating the same shit sandwich
I"m not a lawyer. I wished to used the small claims court. I felt harassed by the clerk when filling out the legal paper work. Unlike London,Ont. Court, Sarnia, Ont. Court doesn't have a Court advocate.
For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of: but the sorrow of the world worketh death. (2 Corinthians 7:10) Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. (Isaiah 55:7) For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. (Romans 6:23)
It is suggested that you watch some of our Canadian Charter in inaction concerning the public in filming in public. Police encounters are becoming increasingly dangerous for the average Canadian to record the interactions of the police in any jurisdiction. There appear to be more loopholes for police to be bullies as enforcers as they call for ID and demand you produce it or you will be detained. You are then harassed and/or threatened with confiscation of your phone or camera and forcibly detained because you express your opinion that filming in public is not illegal in public spaces. This is especially rampant in the Covid crisis as police forces everywhere in North America seem to become judge, jury, and executioner.
We are supposed to have equal rights, but the same charter gives advantages to women and minority... so some people are more equal than others... this document is filled with biases and contradictions.
Im staying at a youth shelter and they are saying I cannot pan handle but from my understanding it goes against the charter of rights by discriminating/punishing for poverty so they said if they saw me they would kick me out of the shelter for like 7 days and also they wont give me a copy of the contract I signed to get in there and by law you cant bind someone to a contract like that is that true?
The Charter only applies to the actions of federal and provincial governments. If the youth shelter is run by the provincial (or municipal) government, then they cannot treat you differently than everyone else. However, I doubt that poverty is an acceptable grounds of discrimination under the Charter.
You could look it up using Google or some other search engine. Here is the link to the Government of Canada webpage - laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html Mobility Rights Mobility of citizens 6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada. Rights to move and gain livelihood (2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right (a) to move to and take up residence in any province; and (b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province. Limitation (3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to (a) any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of present or previous residence; and (b) any laws providing for reasonable residency requirements as a qualification for the receipt of publicly provided social services. Affirmative action programs (4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration in a province of conditions of individuals in that province who are socially or economically disadvantaged if the rate of employment in that province is below the rate of employment in Canada. You will notice there is no mention of some imagined right to operate an automobile on public roads free from such provincial laws as a requirement to possess a valid driver's licence, vehicle registration, or proof of insurance.
"Our rights are a living tree"..... yet human rights ARE a frozen object. Human rights are definable and should never change. I keep trying to say Canada's free, and the whole nation keeps proving me wrong. :(
@@blair5988 It's a philosophical work about human rights. MacIntyre says "Human rights don't exist and belief in them is one with belief in witches and unicorns."
I'm going to fail my exam...
I've replayed this 5 times, and don't remember one word.
Same 😂
You have a exam too???
@@landon6672 yep lol
same
same bruh rip me
This is so helpful but after watching it 7 times I still don't get it
@@dogloverj7 what?
Yeah man that makes the video very helpful xD
I was eating apple during that video. Imagine how is that to me
Canada is a Constitutional Monarchy (where each individual has the right to be free) with a democratic form of government. The individual does not have to give his consent to be governed and can remain free if one understands what is going on. There is no constitution in Canada that involves the people, what is in place delegates the authority of each government. So if you know how to stay outside of the jurisdiction of the governments, you remain free. Free is defined to be under lo legal restraint. So don't feel bad if you don;t get it, all the public actors lie to private individuals so they can steal their labour, time and property.
Native born state national is the one that can remain outside of the corporate governments and stand on the constitutional state called the Dominion of Canada.
i feel like the only people that actually watched this just need to do it for a class assigment
I see how Trudeau has failed Canada so badly.
Just wondering why no mention of Section 33 of Charter of Rights and Freedoms that allows Government to deny us our Charter Rights any time they want. What use is a Charter of Rights if it allows the DENIAL of RIGHTS?
Section 33 allows the denial of the Charter Rights when necessary, such as restricting mobility rights during a pandemic in order to cease the spread. Without the ability to deny rights, the government wouldn't really have the power to enforce a restriction without someone pulling up and saying " Ayo the charter says ( insert ) so I can do this and you are infringing on my rights!' Y'know?
@@Lecheleech yea that makes sense :>
smh some people think Covid isn't real
Tryants will attempt to convince you that it's for the greater good, deny one person rights = every one loses their rights, that is equality...
It was the Premiers that wanted section 33, not the federal government.
I think the Canadian government needs to get reacquainted with the charter of rights.
Justin Trudeau disagrees
I think the Canadian Government has a good handle on this. It's the Provinces that have the problems
Im old enough to remember when this document was used in Canada. Its now officially gone.
Flee the country while you still can!
Amen
Very good video. Thank you for producing this!!! This channel needs more recognition for it's superb work of producing easy to understand content. :))
My teacher played me this is class and I can't get over how great it is!
very good explanation video. Explained a lot to me for my test coming up.
This sounds like a good idea, maybe the Canadian government should start doing it one of these days
My mother in law got rejected a job from the BC government because according to them she was “not the skin colour they were looking for”
The pandemic also abolished every single Canadians rights. You can’t just declare a state of emergency which then eliminates every Canadians rights.
The same thing happened in WWII in USA where Japanese Americans rights (as laid our per the constitution) were ignored because there was an “emergency” at the time. They were then put into internment camps and it was justified”
If our rights don’t hold up when times get tough then we never even had them to begin with.
A woman in Canada if she does not have the responsibility can adopt out her child. Her right and choice. But a father if he does not have the responsibility does not have this right and choice. Equal rights should work equally in Canada, but this is not the case. Fathers in Canada face extreme bias and have no rights or equality.. This needs to be addressed…
This is awesome and very informative, my teacher played this today in class. :)
(sorry, didn't see your reply) I was taking a security course in Kelowna, BC. :) My teacher said he plays this video for all his classes.
Claire Jones 1easss3
Young lady this is so misleading. You need to take a good long look at what happened in toronto many years ago during the g20 conference. The gov actions were the exact opposite of what they put on that peice of paper. Check it out and then ask your teacher about it.
Every Canadian should have a copy of it.
Explained it better than my professor!
watched this in a social studies class!
I believe the charter of rights should include the freedom of unwilling participancy, what I mean by this, if you believe your taxes are supporting a war that you don't believe should be waged, you don't have to support it with your tax dollars.
I also believe there should be a people's court that overrides the supreme court, and is only voted in by the people instead of appointed by the government.
These things will result in a more free society, and gives us more power as individuals. However the unwilling participany needs some rules, but would result in less prison sentences for victimless crimes, such as drug use, more rehab facilities instead and less aggressive wars which means a better homeland defense of our country.
Great ideas!!!
Can a person or child file a formal complaint against their abuser under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
Super awesome to watch! I am going to show this to my Civics teacher!
Gonna show this to my Social Studies students, thank you!
i need to do school stuff on this and i still don't understand
What's better than the charter?? Sovereignty!!
Hi Tyler, if you want to have sovereignty, I can show you the way. It is possible. Read the definition of armorial bearing in the publication called "A Crown of Maples" published by Heritage Canada. This status is what is called a freeman of the realm in England.
I would post some links to help you, but youtube keeps deleting my information to help others fight the communist takeover through public policy. If you reach out to me with an email address I can send you the information you need to understand to be free or under no legal restraint in Canada.
Your metaphors really help!
I've been looking for an interesting way to learn about canadian politics, and not be brutally ignorant on such an important topic, and I've finally found it! You guys rock!
Why is Nova Scotia so big on all of your maps? Is it important to democracy and whatnot, or are you just Nova Scotian?
Imagine how us PEI guys feel, soooo tiny lol
Are rights arn't rights there privileges that the government allows us at least until such time as it interferes with something the government wants to do to us then they simply refer to the small print
Good video. I just want to clarify something that is not accurate in it. In Cuba there is no absence of "SOME" of these rights; in Cuba, there is an absence of ALL of these rights. As a matter of fact, all the rights mentioned in this video, without exception, have been disrespected in Cuba since day 1 of the Castro regime. I thank the creators of this video for mentioning Cuba as THE example of a regime that disrespects human and international rights and gets away with it.
thank you so much!!! by the way i have unit test tommorrow. my brain regain what i have learned in social studies. keep up the good work!!!
It could be like a bicycle that is too standardized as well. One with only pedals and not a rowing or recumbent design that enables those with disabilities to also use the bicycle. Some people just can't afford the basic maintenance costs. Some people need a bicycle that can overcome difficult terrain. Some people live in a figurative mud bog. Those people need a bicycle that can also be a boat aka a paddle boat. So democracy must be flexible and adaptive according to individual circumstances. Democracy must continuously evolve to provide equality when new perspectives and circumstances arise. Because the utility of democracy is only provided equally when the metaphorical bicycle or constitutional law enables each individual to participate freely.
It is direct oppression to make protesting from a vehicle illegal. Given that the majority of people can't afford to travel and pay for hotels. It is cold enough to require a heater almost 8 months of the year. Which means that any law prohibiting individuals from using a vehicle as a place to stay throughout the course of assembly for a protest is also prohibiting participation in free assembly and free expression. If people are restricted to protest only when weather permits outdoor sleeping in conditions similar to homelessness then controversial policies can be passed during the cold season without public discourse.
Similarly, many people work seasonal jobs. The majority of work comes during warmer weather when conditions are more suitable for outdoor projects and schools, aka rental properties, are in turnover season. Thus, it is imperative that freedom of assembly is provided to people who must work seasonal jobs during the off season. Since people working seasonal jobs also have limited income. They cannot afford to stay at hotels or other accommodations. Especially when the policy in question effects their ability to generate income period. Many people live in poverty. Those people need a voice to address the needs in their communities. Things like grocery stores, schools, parks, public infrastructure, public transit, drinking water quality, special needs, counselling services, and much more.
All too often the wealthy neighborhood gets funding for a new park or a new school and there is no incentive for a grocery store franchise to open in the low income area. The gap grows wider and wider. So much so that even if we could provide a voice to all those in need at this moment they would not even possess the faculties to adequately express themselves. That is how poverty effects the body and the mind; aside from things like lead contamination in drinking water from outdated infrastructure ties. Linked to developmental delays, learning disabilities, skeletal disfigurement, and brain cancer. So even if they had a voice it would not be able to explain what is wrong or what they need.
Without a universal fundamental foundation to start from people cannot have equal opportunity. With a solid foundation the outcome can then be determined fairly and on equal footing. Maybe the outcome won't be equal; it will be more balanced than it is in our current state. Nutrition and a clean environment provide the spark needed to motivate individuals over obstacles such as mental health into productive careers that provide some disposable income and the ability to control one's destiny to an extent by managing your own affairs within your own family estate. It's not the perfect life of a homestead living off the land, but at least a real opportunity for families to choose that route or at least get some satisfaction in the process of developing their own individual property and assets. Also, something needs to account for people who were not gifted land in the past. If we can prove our family heritage has never received a free parcel of land from the government then we should be granted an equal portion of land today as reparations. Likewise, any new land purchased using the equity of previously inherited free land should be forfeit and distributed to those with no land. Especially that land and equity gained from the fruits of the land such as forestry and farming.
An aspect of its history, such as how a specific section came to be included?
How one or more sections have been considered and interpreted by the courts?
Ideas for improvements to the Charter?
You've mixed up your cases in regards to the anti-semitic teacher in New Brunswick. It was Keegstra in Eckville, Alberta who was a Socials teacher who actively taught hatred of Jews in the classroom. The New Brunswick teacher was a Math teacher who never brought his views into the classroom. He had specifically denied the Holocaust and and wrote on the issue as a private citizen, not a teacher. The Keegstra case was more open and shut. The Match teacher defended his opinions on the basis that his views were protected by his Charter rights. The courts, I think, didn't overrule his freedom of expression rights, but held that removing him from the classroom as a teacher was acceptable because he could be held to higher standards as a teacher. As a teacher, Jewish students had to feel comfortable in his classroom.
You type to much
nerd
hahahhah
can you / have you expanded on your last point with examples of how some rights are "too solid"
Yes the rights and freedoms are solid, the commonlaw is upstanding.
The third way of changing the charter is to ignore the rights and freedoms with the "Not Withstanding Clause". I lived in Quebec under bill 101 so you forgot to mention that any rights and freedoms under the Charter are wholly conditional. What Governments give you, they can take away.
Thank you for having an actual artist using a whiteboard. I genuinely hate seeing the disembodied hand that draws in clip art. I love the style they have. Does the artist have a link to their work, I'd love to check out their gallery :D
We need to learn about the UDHR in order to really understand the CCRF. Our domestic laws have to fall in line with the International Covenant because Canada is a signatory to it and is under obligation and duty to recognize and protect human rights and freedoms. One very important thing about the CCRF is to know of the 3 different designations. There is a difference between Everyone, Citizen and Legal Person when reading the CCRF. If we are not aware, we can limit our rights and freedoms by taking on the legal person. A human being gets his or her rights from God and are born with them. Persons get their rights and freedoms prescribed by the government. Always stand as a man or woman, not a person or legal fiction.
Thank you!
not all of us coming here bc of a class assignment 😂😂
Awesome! Can't wait to share this with my class on Monday!
I like the pictures being drawn, they definitely help explain what's being said. Good job.
They also kinda remind me of the pictures Mr. Dress Up would draw back on the day. 👍
This was really helpful to help for my test
What protects individual rights in Canada from politicians that want to take rights away?
***** Who appoints the Judges?
+Stiverton Why the Federal Government of course....the Prime Minister's Office to be exact.
and yes I do have a far more cynical view of the Charter, The Courts and Politicians
It would take alot to change the Charter. You need 7 Provinces and 50% of the Canadian population to agree. The prime minister can try but more than likely won't happen.
Other politicians.
Knowledge does. It is how you sign agreements with the government agencies that determine whether they can use public policy against you or not. You have been made a secret agent through the birth certificate which is evidence a crown organization was organized and this is why you must understand what is going on. You can stop consenting to be governed with the stroke of a pen. Just like you can consent to be governed with the stroke of a pen. Lack of knowledge.
Willhem Thomas wants to know. what are the differences between provincial and federal laws ?
If you still care, I think it's mainly that they are made and changed by their respective level of government. A province cannot change a federal law (on its own), and the federal government cannot (for the most part) change provincial laws. The same thing applies to the municipal level as well. Of course, its more complicated than this (it always is) but that's the gist of it.
You only have these rights and freedoms until Section 33 of the Constitution Act 1982, the "NOT WITH STANDING CLAUSE" is enacted, then all these can be thrown out and you no longer have any. This person is trying to make it sound good but he doesn't tell you about the powers both provincial and federal governments have in that one section. Although what is said in this video is mostly true, it doesn't paint the whole truth.
If you believe this, you really need to look at the document and what is said here much more critically. Within the first minute it is mentioned that free and fair elections can't be held without rights and freedoms. That is obviously not true. The other point is the subjectivity of "fair". What is ,"fair" to one person is unjust to another. In fact, this is usually the case: those who benefit most find it fair and those disadvantaged most find it unfair.
Finally, practically the entire charter is "subject to" restrictions. This makes it a charter of "Limited Privileges" not a "Charter of Rights".
Throwing some shade at Cuba, holy.
In what stage of change is the charter now in?
This is rlly helpful for my project thanks
I'm using some information from this in part, for my paper about the Candian Constitution and a dispute about certain details of the "Indian act". Do you have a formal source I could cite? perhaps even yourself? Thanks, it's appreciated.
For anyone coming here in the future, you should just be able to cite it like you would any website, just use your citation formula
what is the difference between the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms and the declaration of the rights of man and citizen ..... like Canadian government and American government
Bill of rights is a separate document alongside the constitution. Canada has it all on one document.
just wait to hear my story , then see the pictures in 5 dimension
good luck for inke on paper
So explain to me why the charter applies in some provinces but not in others. Living in Quebec there seems to be a lot of rights that we don't have but those of other provinces do have , is it because Canada and Quebec are two different countries with the same money.
*Deceit is Disobediance.*
*Jealousy and Cowardice is misery.*
thank you for the info :)
Homosexuality, like heterosexuality, bisexuality, etc, isn't a "lifestyle," unless you consider your natural predisposition a "choice."
Thank you I got 100 percent on my test
I in my experience we have no access to human rights and freedoms, we are taught we are protected . But depending on income and legal aid resources, it may not be accessible to low income earners. Per your charts human rights commission does not investigate all issues and thefore this is not applicable to all human rights cases. Access to law or representation in a poverty situation in my experience is not possible. Their are gaps in our process to gain access. We are not seeing the fine print or excludsions of individuals or the claims its self
I work securty, but because of the great authoritarian power that is rising up from this pandemic, it looks like very soon they may have me checking for jab passports for businesses, if I have to force segregation and discrimination between the jabbed, and the un-jabbed, I will decline that kind of work, I will not be used as an authoritarian tool. I believe preserving our human rights and freedoms are far more important for our future generations.
Nice video but someone needs to add a comma in the word "Courts"
This was extremely helpful for me.
So in court does the charter supersede other laws ... like the right for police to enter your home on a suspicion without a warrant as could happen with the new impaired driving laws which totally violate our rights and have they been challenged?
I don't have a foggiest idea
It happens in America no law is above the constitutional laws in not sure what happens in Canada even though I live here
2:02 Can y'all not understand it in cartoon format either?
Great video. My paper is gonna be great 😊
does the first rights of the charter include the right to being a parent and not be denied this because of financial class or being seen as an easy target by other members of society.?????
So what would happen if there was no charter of Rights and freedoms? please I need it for my 5 paragraph essay
Pulse sorry I’m late, but it would basically be North Korea.
Awesome to have.. Only part I dont agree with is giving opportunities to someone based on skin color and ethnic history as opposed to the best man or woman for the job. Tired of cultural appropriation. I don't owe anybody squat. Everyone is eating the same shit sandwich
I got a link to this awesome video!
Do we have a 1st amendment equivalent in Canada? (freedom of press)
I"m not a lawyer. I wished to used the small claims court. I felt harassed by the clerk when filling out the legal paper work. Unlike London,Ont. Court, Sarnia, Ont. Court doesn't have a Court advocate.
Is Canadian Charter a convention or a statue?
It's the charter for a corporation called Canada, that is operating on the land/constitutional nation state called the Dominion of Canada.
I am from India
Thanks
Don’t let Trudeau see this video
South Africa's constitution recognizes healthy environment in it's bill of rights plus in south africa polygamy is prefectly legal
Who else is watching this for school
Do you think this charter is anti democratic
For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of: but the sorrow of the world worketh death. (2 Corinthians 7:10)
Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. (Isaiah 55:7)
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. (Romans 6:23)
It is suggested that you watch some of our Canadian Charter in inaction concerning the public in filming in public. Police encounters are becoming increasingly dangerous for the average Canadian to record the interactions of the police in any jurisdiction. There appear to be more loopholes for police to be bullies as enforcers as they call for ID and demand you produce it or you will be detained. You are then harassed and/or threatened with confiscation of your phone or camera and forcibly detained because you express your opinion that filming in public is not illegal in public spaces. This is especially rampant in the Covid crisis as police forces everywhere in North America seem to become judge, jury, and executioner.
excellent, thank you
this was fun to watch
We are supposed to have equal rights, but the same charter gives advantages to women and minority... so some people are more equal than others... this document is filled with biases and contradictions.
limitations to charter?
Im staying at a youth shelter and they are saying I cannot pan handle but from my understanding it goes against the charter of rights by discriminating/punishing for poverty so they said if they saw me they would kick me out of the shelter for like 7 days and also they wont give me a copy of the contract I signed to get in there and by law you cant bind someone to a contract like that is that true?
The Charter only applies to the actions of federal and provincial governments. If the youth shelter is run by the provincial (or municipal) government, then they cannot treat you differently than everyone else. However, I doubt that poverty is an acceptable grounds of discrimination under the Charter.
I wanna know What it says about traveling???
You could look it up using Google or some other search engine. Here is the link to the Government of Canada webpage - laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html
Mobility Rights
Mobility of citizens
6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.
Rights to move and gain livelihood
(2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right
(a) to move to and take up residence in any province; and
(b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.
Limitation
(3) The rights specified in subsection (2) are subject to
(a) any laws or practices of general application in force in a province other than those that discriminate among persons primarily on the basis of province of present or previous residence; and
(b) any laws providing for reasonable residency requirements as a qualification for the receipt of publicly provided social services.
Affirmative action programs
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration in a province of conditions of individuals in that province who are socially or economically disadvantaged if the rate of employment in that province is below the rate of employment in Canada.
You will notice there is no mention of some imagined right to operate an automobile on public roads free from such provincial laws as a requirement to possess a valid driver's licence, vehicle registration, or proof of insurance.
Now explain this to the cops
That's funny
Omg, he is drawing so cool
oh, Im sorry about that : P. I did some notes from this because this is very helpful
The music is so distracting
Therefore you can’t have a monarchy.
love the message but the quality is poor...
So informative!
Hi
February 18, 2022
what does this mean?
This video is great (3:11)
Yes but if someday everybody in the world shared beliefs mostly the same . Than we would be able to go easily with only unwritten rules
Here cause of my class on my alt
WOW
"Our rights are a living tree"..... yet human rights ARE a frozen object.
Human rights are definable and should never change.
I keep trying to say Canada's free, and the whole nation keeps proving me wrong. :(
Matholameu Maze yes when it got to that point, I thought this is very dangerous.
Human rights don't exist. Read MacIntyre's "After Virtue."
@@scytale6 why what's it's about?
@@blair5988 It's a philosophical work about human rights. MacIntyre says "Human rights don't exist and belief in them is one with belief in witches and unicorns."
I’m gonna fail my p.a.t so bad
hello
That was awesome