Yea, it would seem like agi = totem (right click), str = ulty (big boy big slam) and int = fissuer + aftershock (spell dmg from safe distance).. but that would probably be a bit too generic. Agi without attacking is bit more unique, but kinda unsynergistic.
It would be interesting to see normalized winnings. Say the prizes are 1,2,3,4,5 in one TI, 2,6,8,10 in other one. Can't really compare so we divide first set of prizes by 5 and second by ten, so the winners always get 1 point and others get fractions. Another idea is to implement a weighted sum which would be as follows: If a hero is picked in a game, it gets, say, 10 points. If the game is within finals, we multiply it by 1. If semifinals, then multiply by 0.5 quarter -> x0.25 and so fourth And then sum those weighted results. In this model I say that if the hero is trusted enough to be picked in higher level games these picks are valued more. This may offer some statistical insight But it depends heavily on the weights selection. In a double elimination bracket my choice can be valid, in single elimination, however, every stage that ends with the word -final is more equally important because you lose = you're out, so the weights should be closer. Building a good credible metric that represents stuff well requires thought and trial&error, but it yields great insight, so there's that
I did not guess 44 mil bcz i have no clue how high was the price pool for the last 5-6 TIs... but I would guess he was in almost every grand final = he would be at least 2nd place in most TIs. ES is one of the best heroes ever. He only sux in Dota 2 bcz of that ugly "Chewbacca fucked guinea pig" costume they put on him... I loved him in DotA.
The fuck is he talking about? Is Dota a solo game? If yes then earthshaker has earned millions, but if dota isn't a solo game then you're just spitting nonsent
it's just a method of counting, man, no need to be so angry. You can agree with it or you can disagree, but there is no right metric anyways. You also can divide everything by 5, which ultimately would lead to the same scoring amongst all heroes, just divided by five.
![SumiYa Juggernaut Omnislasher - Dota 2 Pro Gameplay [Watch & Learn]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XNvb9mEw03o/mqdefault.jpg)
Im sorry, but Baumi, we now need a Baumi's hero earning ranking to see the most/least profitable heros of all time
one day chen will actually win a custom mode and chat will spoil it.
Iirc it already happened once
Yea, it would seem like agi = totem (right click), str = ulty (big boy big slam) and int = fissuer + aftershock (spell dmg from safe distance).. but that would probably be a bit too generic. Agi without attacking is bit more unique, but kinda unsynergistic.
So... Baumi is playing Primal Beast.
... I never tought I'd live to see the day where a hero build with 3 BOOTS would be legit good!
It would be interesting to see normalized winnings. Say the prizes are 1,2,3,4,5 in one TI, 2,6,8,10 in other one. Can't really compare so we divide first set of prizes by 5 and second by ten, so the winners always get 1 point and others get fractions.
Another idea is to implement a weighted sum which would be as follows:
If a hero is picked in a game, it gets, say, 10 points.
If the game is within finals, we multiply it by 1.
If semifinals, then multiply by 0.5
quarter -> x0.25
and so fourth
And then sum those weighted results. In this model I say that if the hero is trusted enough to be picked in higher level games these picks are valued more. This may offer some statistical insight
But it depends heavily on the weights selection. In a double elimination bracket my choice can be valid, in single elimination, however, every stage that ends with the word -final is more equally important because you lose = you're out, so the weights should be closer. Building a good credible metric that represents stuff well requires thought and trial&error, but it yields great insight, so there's that
oh how I love the forbidden land of math
also, some other math geek probably had this already done, just need to find it somewhere in the deep corners of Reddit
Its so messed up that future baumi is actually a baumi of the past
I think you are underestimating bloodstone too much but either the heart was a good choice
I think in this build Aftershock should triggered through autoatack and stun for 0.15 second to be annoying with out bkb but not permastun
AfterShaker or AfterShocker?
I did not guess 44 mil bcz i have no clue how high was the price pool for the last 5-6 TIs... but I would guess he was in almost every grand final = he would be at least 2nd place in most TIs. ES is one of the best heroes ever. He only sux in Dota 2 bcz of that ugly "Chewbacca fucked guinea pig" costume they put on him... I loved him in DotA.
Man that screenshake makes me dizzy.
you woulda won regardless, that was not dishonorable
Bahini come to my basement after work we will habve so much fun together ;))))))
The fuck is he talking about? Is Dota a solo game? If yes then earthshaker has earned millions, but if dota isn't a solo game then you're just spitting nonsent
it's just a method of counting, man, no need to be so angry. You can agree with it or you can disagree, but there is no right metric anyways.
You also can divide everything by 5, which ultimately would lead to the same scoring amongst all heroes, just divided by five.