NRSVue SBL Study Bible: James
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- #bible
Joe St. Eggbenedictus has served the local church for over 20 years. His interests include Bibles, books, preaching, teaching, and junk drawer items, particularly pencils and notebooks. Joe is author of three books, including two books of essays, and a third co-authored for caregivers and caregiver spirituality.
-----
Find Joe's blog here: baptistspiritu...
----
Purchase Joe's books here: www.amazon.com...
---------
![[FULL EP.73] เปิดบ้าน 70 ล้าน "แป้ง Zbing" ยกมาทั้งญี่ปุ่น l เคหสถานบานปลาย l One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YBnJhTt07Pg/mqdefault.jpg)
Amen to that! Eternal matters should be settled so we can live rightly. Don't forget to enjoy life too though!
That's a good reflection!
As we Appalachian-Americans say: "God willing, and the river don't rise."
"You gonna make it to Earl and Becky's 50th anniversary cookout?"
"Yep...God willing, and the river don't rise."
A variant is "...and the creek don't rise." I prefer river, because of the alliteration. But both speak to the capriciousness of nature and the folly of human certainty.
Thanks for the good word, brother.
The Lord willing...
The passage is about ambitious people who are indulgent in their planning of the earthly vain prosperity or profit. However, wise planning for safety and security is taught in the parables like the Shrewd manager, and the man who built something with proper financial planning and process.
Interesting that the devotional note uses normal or traditional English instead of the inclusive language of the translation. I’m sure businessman and he wasn’t meant to exclude business women.
The author of the citated study note - Mariam Kovalyshin. Her surname sounds Russian.
Hi, I need to find out comparison of how much do our top English bibles like ESV NRSV encorporate LXX and provides their variant readings of other language. Which one contain better variant readings for lxx dss. I guess ESV is better in using LXX reading in the text, avoiding MT., but not ssuure about footnote alternate readings compared to NRSV. Ideally they should have exhaustive footnotes of variants rather than foolish footnotes of woke gender inclusivity of pronouns etc.
Not sure what you mean here. I don't do any work with the ESV.