They probably aren’t exposed to the same levels in certain things like phthalates or bisphenol either, because they’re not eating by from plastic or using shampoo.
There is compelling evidence suggesting that it does. Some marine mammals living in chemically polluted water are observed to suffer from severe reproductive harms. The higher up the food chain (i.e., carnivores) the greater the contamination. The rump fat in polar bears has been shown to contain PCBs in concentrations a billion times greater than the seawater they swim in and eat from. The bodies of beluga whales that lived in chemically contaminated water contain such high concentrations of PCBs and other toxins they are considered to be toxic waste. This is the insidious nature of long-lived, lipophilic, hormone disrupting chemicals. We can't see them, but they are there, causing real harm, and there's no way to clean them up or get them out. In my considered opinion, this constitutes ecocide.
Could it also be a social symptom of not learning and defining a gender identity? what i have recently understood is that our social behaviour is more responsible for testosterone levels than i thought before (i am a medical doctor), which is also responsible for sperm count. what exactly is the difference between societies with weaker and stronger gender definitions? ps: only one sperm has to find the egg cell.
Is this finding also true for other mammals, such as domestic cattle, sheep, etc.?
They probably aren’t exposed to the same levels in certain things like phthalates or bisphenol either, because they’re not eating by from plastic or using shampoo.
There is compelling evidence suggesting that it does. Some marine mammals living in chemically polluted water are observed to suffer from severe reproductive harms. The higher up the food chain (i.e., carnivores) the greater the contamination. The rump fat in polar bears has been shown to contain PCBs in concentrations a billion times greater than the seawater they swim in and eat from. The bodies of beluga whales that lived in chemically contaminated water contain such high concentrations of PCBs and other toxins they are considered to be toxic waste. This is the insidious nature of long-lived, lipophilic, hormone disrupting chemicals. We can't see them, but they are there, causing real harm, and there's no way to clean them up or get them out. In my considered opinion, this constitutes ecocide.
@@zinniazinnia2145 Is that really an answer that is in line with the question?
@@xostler Is that really an answer that is in line with the question?
Could it also be a social symptom of not learning and defining a gender identity? what i have recently understood is that our social behaviour is more responsible for testosterone levels than i thought before (i am a medical doctor), which is also responsible for sperm count. what exactly is the difference between societies with weaker and stronger gender definitions? ps: only one sperm has to find the egg cell.
This is not a crisis. This is a cure. 8 billion humans is too many.
But extinction isn’t
The population in the West is already declining without this problem; thus, as Western culture is lost, the world population will actually increase.
You are welcome to get yourself snipped.
@@theneedle6785 Try to stay focused on the topic here. This is not about vasectomy. This is about sperm counts.
@@Paul_Atreides There is nothing wrong with humans going extinct. They appear to have cleverly arranged this outcome for themselves.