Actually, dumbledor doesn't understand parseltongue... it's said in half blood prince during the "private lessons" with harry... When he's in gaunt house's vision, he says something like "I'm sure you have no trouble to understand them" and clearly says that he can't.
Murdering someone is not the only thing that creates the horcrux...there is a ritual that is too repulsive to mention that one has to perform... Dumbledore DID NOT CREATE A HORCRUX
SCB postulated that Dumbledore created a horcrux several years ago and The author explicitly stated that Dumbledore NEVER created a horcrux. Much less two.
I agree with most of you people, Dumbledore never created a horcrux. As for the creator of this video he/she debunked thier own video. No. 1- He/She said that Ariana could have been an Obcurial (one that suppressed their magic) and could have died from that AND that nobody knows whose spell actually hit Ariana, not to mention that the spell was a rebounded spell and a rebounded spell is NOT murder it's an accidental death ànd can't be used to create a horcrux. No. 2 - He/She was saying that just because Fawks came to Harry In the 'Chamber of Secrets' then Fawks was Dumbledore's horcrux. Well, who did Dumbledore murder to create it and in the 1st or 2nd movie before Harry went to the Chamber of Secrets Harry saw Fawks burst into flames and die which would kill any peice of another's soul, only the Phoenix will be reborn so Fawks wouldn't be a horcrux any longer, so helping Harry in the chamber is not because of Fawks was a horcrux. To keep this comment down to a minimum I won't list All his/hers mistakes. Take care fellow Potterheads.
A specific spell is used to create a Horcruxe . When magic is interfered with unexpected outcome . Lilly by sacrificing herself when a massive spell went off caused a Horcrux . What did Lilly know about Horcruxes ?
there is no way dumbledore made a horcrux...he had the books in his office...that would give him all the information as they did riddle. with the concept of alchemy albus-white/rubeus-red supporting no horcrux. given how much dumbledore knows elsewhere in the books. i'd say albus knew exactly where the entrance to the chamber of secrets was, and he couldn't enter as he was not able to speak parselmouth. like him casually mentioning his nighttime trip to the room of requirement at the yule ball. which contains a broken vanishing cabinet (he's at least heard the same as draco about it), and a horcrux (dumbledore didn't just let the blood shot eyed/waxy face riddle meander round hogwarts and the grounds without eyes on), and is instrumental for the da's secret training. i think they could have shown a better fawkes lament. a musical fire bird could do so much more
He suspected, he only confirmed it, when Harry got Professor Slug Horns memory and looks at it in the panseen and figure out There were 7 and Harry Potter was the 8 🤷🏻♀️
Nagini Voldemort's snake was the last one created after Chapter 1 The Riddle House and the start of chapter 2 The Scar of Goblet of Fire it's why Harry woke up with his scar burning and has been confirmed by JK Rowling
We were told you have to MURDER to create a horcrux. Why do people twist themselves in knots to support a pet theory instead of just checking their work against the simplest of principles? The foolish premise is flawed from the start. (Let alone the other problems with it-such as Dumbledore struggling to understand what Voldemort had done to survive his attempt at killing Harry before they got the memory from Slughorn).
The result of a failed horcrux is what killed voldemort the first time. The only reason why he still was somewhat successful was because he had the other 5.
@@JoshSims-u3uThe man was absolutely capable of killing. Everyone is. He wasn’t a psychopath but he WAS pragmatic. He would have taken a life if he felt it was necessary to protect others. In particular he would have gladly killed Voldemort himself if he could have figured out away to do it to protect Harry and the school in general.
Do you really think Dumbledore would have left the Basilisk in the castle if he had known it was there? Hell no. Dumbledore himself says he never made a horcrux and I find it repulsive you would suggest it.
The Phoenix is a creature of rebirth and renewal, eternal and incapable of death. They rise from the ashes of their own pyre after reaching the end of their body's endurance, but there's no way they could carry another soul along with them. Fawkes was bound to Dumbledore through love, just as Hedwig was bound to Harry. The only difference between the two is that an owl can be killed but a phoenix is immortal. But, no matter how much Fawkes loved Dumbledore, do you really think he'd have stayed with a human capable of committing the actions necessary to produce a horcrux? I sure don't.
This must be one of the DUMBEST theories ever. Fawks burned up in The Philospher's Stone book and was reborn. Dumblore knew a lot of magic including dark magic but that doesn't mean he would create a Horcrux. Unless Dumbledore fired the blast that killed his sister she could not have turned into a horcrux for him and there is more involved in the creation of horcrux than just killing someone ... if that was all it took then every death eater would have a horcrux, every auror that killed anyone would have a horcrus, even Molly Weasley would have gotten a horcrux. And from the next series we know that the phoenix has been part of the dumbledore family for generations.
Horcruxes can only be created by committing murder. Molly and the aurors killed their enemies in self defence. The death eaters committed murders but few of them were skilled enough in dark magic to create horcruxes. Bellatrix probably created one for herself because she was both skilled and part of Voldemort's inner circle
It was Chamber of Secrets Fawkes caught on fire after Justin Fletchley was attack with Nearly Headless Nick saving him from seeing the Basilisk head on and Harry got escorted to Dumbledore's office and Fawks burst into flame and Harry panicked thinking he was gonna get blamed for it as well but to his surprise Dumbledore just said "It's about time to"
Actually, dumbledor doesn't understand parseltongue... it's said in half blood prince during the "private lessons" with harry...
When he's in gaunt house's vision, he says something like "I'm sure you have no trouble to understand them" and clearly says that he can't.
Murdering someone is not the only thing that creates the horcrux...there is a ritual that is too repulsive to mention that one has to perform... Dumbledore DID NOT CREATE A HORCRUX
SCB postulated that Dumbledore created a horcrux several years ago and The author explicitly stated that Dumbledore NEVER created a horcrux. Much less two.
The Basilisk was not a horcrux. It was slain by a weapon that only became a horcrux buster after it was used to kill the Basilisk...
I agree with most of you people, Dumbledore never created a horcrux. As for the creator of this video he/she debunked thier own video. No. 1- He/She said that Ariana could have been an Obcurial (one that suppressed their magic) and could have died from that AND that nobody knows whose spell actually hit Ariana, not to mention that the spell was a rebounded spell and a rebounded spell is NOT murder it's an accidental death ànd can't be used to create a horcrux. No. 2 - He/She was saying that just because Fawks came to Harry In the 'Chamber of Secrets' then Fawks was Dumbledore's horcrux. Well, who did Dumbledore murder to create it and in the 1st or 2nd movie before Harry went to the Chamber of Secrets Harry saw Fawks burst into flames and die which would kill any peice of another's soul, only the Phoenix will be reborn so Fawks wouldn't be a horcrux any longer, so helping Harry in the chamber is not because of Fawks was a horcrux. To keep this comment down to a minimum I won't list All his/hers mistakes. Take care fellow Potterheads.
In Fantastic Beasts: the Secrets of Dumbledore, we find out that Credence is Alberforth’s son, they were reunited at the end..
A specific spell is used to create a Horcruxe . When magic is interfered with unexpected outcome . Lilly by sacrificing herself when a massive spell went off caused a Horcrux . What did Lilly know about Horcruxes ?
there is no way dumbledore made a horcrux...he had the books in his office...that would give him all the information as they did riddle. with the concept of alchemy albus-white/rubeus-red supporting no horcrux.
given how much dumbledore knows elsewhere in the books. i'd say albus knew exactly where the entrance to the chamber of secrets was, and he couldn't enter as he was not able to speak parselmouth.
like him casually mentioning his nighttime trip to the room of requirement at the yule ball. which contains a broken vanishing cabinet (he's at least heard the same as draco about it), and a horcrux (dumbledore didn't just let the blood shot eyed/waxy face riddle meander round hogwarts and the grounds without eyes on), and is instrumental for the da's secret training.
i think they could have shown a better fawkes lament. a musical fire bird could do so much more
Thank you for the video ☺️
He suspected, he only confirmed it, when Harry got Professor Slug Horns memory and looks at it in the panseen and figure out There were 7 and Harry Potter was the 8 🤷🏻♀️
Nagini Voldemort's snake was the last one created after Chapter 1 The Riddle House and the start of chapter 2 The Scar of Goblet of Fire it's why Harry woke up with his scar burning and has been confirmed by JK Rowling
We were told you have to MURDER to create a horcrux. Why do people twist themselves in knots to support a pet theory instead of just checking their work against the simplest of principles? The foolish premise is flawed from the start.
(Let alone the other problems with it-such as Dumbledore struggling to understand what Voldemort had done to survive his attempt at killing Harry before they got the memory from Slughorn).
I don’t know if you watched the secrets of dumbeldore but it reveals who credence is
Horcrux is the worst action of dark magic, of course Dumbledore didn't make any Horcrux
Another good show 😊
The result of a failed horcrux is what killed voldemort the first time.
The only reason why he still was somewhat successful was because he had the other 5.
Fawkes would be the perfect Horcrux. He never dies lol.
Dumbledore doesn't have any horcruxes he never killed anyone
He does not know was he killing his own sister or not.
He believed he was the one who killed his sister.
@@danielgodfrey4415 and I feel horrible for him about that he is not capable of killing anyone
@@JoshSims-u3uThe man was absolutely capable of killing. Everyone is. He wasn’t a psychopath but he WAS pragmatic. He would have taken a life if he felt it was necessary to protect others. In particular he would have gladly killed Voldemort himself if he could have figured out away to do it to protect Harry and the school in general.
@Vales55 yeah in self defense or defense of a third party not in cold blood
Do you really think Dumbledore would have left the Basilisk in the castle if he had known it was there? Hell no. Dumbledore himself says he never made a horcrux and I find it repulsive you would suggest it.
The Phoenix is a creature of rebirth and renewal, eternal and incapable of death. They rise from the ashes of their own pyre after reaching the end of their body's endurance, but there's no way they could carry another soul along with them. Fawkes was bound to Dumbledore through love, just as Hedwig was bound to Harry. The only difference between the two is that an owl can be killed but a phoenix is immortal. But, no matter how much Fawkes loved Dumbledore, do you really think he'd have stayed with a human capable of committing the actions necessary to produce a horcrux? I sure don't.
Curious. Very curious
if Credence is a Dumbledore, why didn’t a phoenix go to him and help during his terrible life… he was abused by nearly everyone..
Are you sure Hedwig wasn’t a Horcrux either?
If that was the case he would have died before dumbledore died off the tower
When did voldemort turn the basilisk into a living Horcrux?
The Basilisk was never a Horcrux. Only Nagini was used as a Horcrux.
I am not so sure that dumbledor had 2 horcruxes but I only know of one dumbledor horcrux and that is faulkes the phonex.
Fawkes was not ever a Horcrux. In mythology, a Phoenix is a cyclical creature perpetually repeating the cycle of life.
Harry Potter isn’t real life just enjoy the video and chill
Sorry, but this is a dumb theory.
This must be one of the DUMBEST theories ever. Fawks burned up in The Philospher's Stone book and was reborn. Dumblore knew a lot of magic including dark magic but that doesn't mean he would create a Horcrux. Unless Dumbledore fired the blast that killed his sister she could not have turned into a horcrux for him and there is more involved in the creation of horcrux than just killing someone ... if that was all it took then every death eater would have a horcrux, every auror that killed anyone would have a horcrus, even Molly Weasley would have gotten a horcrux. And from the next series we know that the phoenix has been part of the dumbledore family for generations.
Horcruxes can only be created by committing murder. Molly and the aurors killed their enemies in self defence. The death eaters committed murders but few of them were skilled enough in dark magic to create horcruxes. Bellatrix probably created one for herself because she was both skilled and part of Voldemort's inner circle
It was Chamber of Secrets Fawkes caught on fire after Justin Fletchley was attack with Nearly Headless Nick saving him from seeing the Basilisk head on and Harry got escorted to Dumbledore's office and Fawks burst into flame and Harry panicked thinking he was gonna get blamed for it as well but to his surprise Dumbledore just said "It's about time to"
Not to mention that The Author explocitly states that dumbledore NEVER created a horcrux.
@@Nick-zp3ub No, not just murder .... by killing someone. Self defense would not prevent the creation if death was the only requirement.