El avatar no tiene historia, porque la historia es un constructo, una ilusión de la narrativa. No tiene identidad porque la identidad es un capricho de lo finito y fragmentado. No es consciente de sí mismo, porque la conciencia y la auto-percepción son limitaciones de entidades finitas, y él es la anti-esencia de cualquier limitación. No trasciende nada, porque es la trascendencia misma, hasta el punto en el que todas las ideas de trascender se vuelven redundantes y el concepto mismo de superación o ir más allá pierde sentido en ese total. The avatar has no history, because history is a construct, an illusion of narrative. It has no identity because identity is a whim of the finite and fragmented. He is not self-aware, because consciousness and self-perception are limitations of finite entities, and he is the anti-essence of any limitation. It transcends nothing, because it is transcendence itself, the point at which all ideas of transcending become redundant, nor try to overcome it because the very concept of overcoming loses, or beyond meaning in that total.
Esos personajes que se enfrento fue más bien para mostrar su capacidad, ya el avatar trajo a tarr para que pelearan contra el"contenido" terminando perdiendo haci que el Avatar los volvio a donde corresponde, ya que el avatar le intrigaba un poco. Y ese ser desconocido también fue llevado, pero para ser eliminado por eso no se conoce porque ya no existe, porque tenía una habilidad muy peligrosa que el autor desconoce, creo a eso seres como un metoro de distracción, aproveche para explicar su átomo incluso, pero ya fue eliminado
El Avatar, como manifestación de la nada y la trascendencia absoluta, supera todo porque no está sujeto a las reglas que rigen la existencia, la competencia o la superación. Al ser la ruptura de todo lo que puede ser limitado, la anti-esencia absoluta, el Avatar no tiene rival, ni siquiera en un sentido abstracto. Cualquier intento de superarlo se vuelve redundante porque el Avatar no pertenece a ningún sistema de comparación, ni tiene una naturaleza que pueda ser mejorada o alterada. En última instancia, el Avatar es la superación misma: la superación de todo lo que puede ser superado, la ruptura de todas las formas y categorías, el fin de toda distinción
Que hubiera pasado si Goku AF y Vegeta AF Que Era Hermano y Caía En El Mundo De Dragon Ball Super Son Mujeres Son Goki y Princesa Vegita | Vegeta AF x Goki Super, Goku AF x Vegita Super
Its good 👍 but the contexts is full of escalation without implying some record history or even storyline,the contexts thats describe on the video seemingly focus on some certain part and that's its "capabilities" without relation to how it works on all things point of view ( the very definitions and how it can be escalated through pure junction),although very absurd and overpowered to hear,i must say its partially okay. Thus,there's something that you shouldnt do,and thats by taking AMNQ2 images as references for further contexts explanations,and i think i saw " Tarr " on your video for example,and you shouldnt use that. I've warned you that using AMNQ2 characters for relation or references to upscale your given contexts is unnecessary because it can be diminished and unescalated to its already original contexts,and thus any given contexts for reference relate by focusing " more power " or make it " Consistency " enough to make sure of what it can do will be utterly hypothetical for its already original state, meaning its "dilemma" and unsure to choose. Overall,i will wait for next video and that is history,cosmology,storyline and many more by focusing plot on your character.
You need to ensure that the structural integrity of the explanation statement must be consistent enough, and avoid the escalatory descriptions and focus instead on contextual consistency. You also need to build coherent framework that requires history, cosmology, and plot-driven progression to ground the character’s essence and capabilities. Even with pure power escalation, no matter how esoteric or absurd, becomes meaningless if there is no framework-no foundation-for its existence and influence to be made. Try establish a foundational record for the character’s presence and its role in the overarching storyline. The origin doesn’t necessarily need to be explicit, but it must imply a point of intersection with the cosmology, such as the first "rift" in reality where the character became a concept, a paradox, or an anti-concept or something you need to briefly explain in various ways. Furthermore,you also need to create the Cosmology and Structure of Reality,to avoid arbitrary descriptions, clarify the framework of the character's "world" or existence. How does their presence relate to the greater cosmological layers? Does it reside outside all structures, or does it fracture reality from within? These points add weight and purpose to their capabilities. Adding some Mechanism of Capabilities can further add up some rational contexts ,this is to Avoid focusing purely on raw power escalation. Instead, describe the mechanism or principle through which the character interacts with all things. Relate it to the very definitions of causality, logic, or paradox to ground its feats. If you add Philosophical and Narrative Ties,it will be 10 times more consistent and that's by Introduce the thematic elements that connect the character’s absurd capabilities to meaningful symbolism or story progression. This ensures the description remains compelling and avoids feeling detached. Despite that,If you want to make the character looks epic on people perspective including you,try make a plot Integration and Storyline,which's by Frame the character’s presence and capabilities within a narrative arc. How do they progress? How do their actions or existence impact the plot, cosmology, or the perspectives of others? Escalation should feel earned through story development rather than implied as inherent power. And the most important thing you should do is Avoid the External References at all cost,this is to ensure that all descriptions and frameworks are self-contained within the story or cosmology. Using other established ideas or characters as direct references weakens the integrity and uniqueness of the concept. Focus solely on expanding your character’s lore and world. For conclusion, make the character and its capabilities believable and consistent, focus on building a narrative foundation-its history, cosmology, mechanisms of action, and philosophical significance. Avoid arbitrary comparisons or external references, and ensure that every escalation of power ties directly into the plot progression and conceptual framework. This approach grounds even the most abstract and overpowered concepts into a coherent, engaging story structure.
@@H45-l6bIt is very complex to make a story with cosmology, he fights with Tarr because he tried to enslave him, the beings he fought with are beings something similar to Tarr, those are fictional beings, who tried to defeat the avatar, and thanks for the information.
@@AlexlepileoFiction and existence are fundamentally different concepts, though they can intersect depending on perspective or context. they relate as: • Fiction refers to imagined or invented realities created by human minds. These are stories, characters, worlds, and events that exist within the confines of a narrative framework, such as books, films, or other mediums of storytelling. Fiction is not "real" in a physical or existential sense but holds meaning within the human experience because of the emotions, ideas, and truths it conveys symbolically. Fictional worlds and entities are governed by rules set by their creators, and their "existence" is dependent on perception, belief, or interaction within the medium they occupy. • Existence refers to the state of being real, present, or actual, independent of imagination or invention. It encompasses everything that is observable (physical reality), theoretical (concepts and ideas), or speculative (questions of metaphysics). In philosophy, existence is often debated in terms of what constitutes "real" and whether non-physical entities, like ideas or numbers, have existence beyond human thought. Existence can be considered universal and objective, though subjective interpretations of reality may vary. If we determine whether existence = fiction,we need to discuss something like a debate discourse because the way you just said can be constitutely problematic. Fictional characters and worlds "exist" within the frameworks created for them. For example, Superman exists as a fictional character in the DC Universe. While he doesn't physically exist in the material world, he has an existence defined by the rules of his fictional setting and the collective imagination of humanity. Fictional creations can influence the real world, such as through culture, emotions, or philosophical ideas. These impacts are real and exist, but the fictional origins remain distinct from the existence of their fictional. Some philosophies, like idealism or panpsychism, explore the idea that all reality could be a construct, potentially blurring the line between fiction and existence. Similarly, in certain speculative theories (e.g., simulation theory), what we perceive as existence could itself be a "fiction" created by a higher-level reality. Likewise, Fiction and existence are not the same. Fiction depends on imagination and narrative frameworks, while existence refers to the reality of being. However, fiction can "exist" as a concept or influence within reality, and philosophical debates about the nature of existence sometimes challenge where the line between the two lies.
Gusto mucho de sus videos, pero ese personaje esta hecho para puro escaling Alex, basicamente el video si resumeo en hablar que el personaje derroto y transcendeo eso y aquillo, no tiene contexto solo poder y mas poder, perdon bro pero eso no fue bueno
El avatar no tiene historia, porque la historia es un constructo, una ilusión de la narrativa. No tiene identidad porque la identidad es un capricho de lo finito y fragmentado. No es consciente de sí mismo, porque la conciencia y la auto-percepción son limitaciones de entidades finitas, y él es la anti-esencia de cualquier limitación. No trasciende nada, porque es la trascendencia misma, hasta el punto en el que todas las ideas de trascender se vuelven redundantes y el concepto mismo de superación o ir más allá pierde sentido en ese total.
The avatar has no history, because history is a construct, an illusion of narrative. It has no identity because identity is a whim of the finite and fragmented. He is not self-aware, because consciousness and self-perception are limitations of finite entities, and he is the anti-essence of any limitation. It transcends nothing, because it is transcendence itself, the point at which all ideas of transcending become redundant, nor try to overcome it because the very concept of overcoming loses, or beyond meaning in that total.
Esos personajes que se enfrento fue más bien para mostrar su capacidad, ya el avatar trajo a tarr para que pelearan contra el"contenido" terminando perdiendo haci que el Avatar los volvio a donde corresponde, ya que el avatar le intrigaba un poco.
Y ese ser desconocido también fue llevado, pero para ser eliminado por eso no se conoce porque ya no existe, porque tenía una habilidad muy peligrosa que el autor desconoce, creo a eso seres como un metoro de distracción, aproveche para explicar su átomo incluso, pero ya fue eliminado
El Avatar, como manifestación de la nada y la trascendencia absoluta, supera todo porque no está sujeto a las reglas que rigen la existencia, la competencia o la superación. Al ser la ruptura de todo lo que puede ser limitado, la anti-esencia absoluta, el Avatar no tiene rival, ni siquiera en un sentido abstracto. Cualquier intento de superarlo se vuelve redundante porque el Avatar no pertenece a ningún sistema de comparación, ni tiene una naturaleza que pueda ser mejorada o alterada.
En última instancia, el Avatar es la superación misma: la superación de todo lo que puede ser superado, la ruptura de todas las formas y categorías, el fin de toda distinción
Es superior al Super Saiyan Beyond Everyting?
@adrianramoss989si
Que hubiera pasado si Goku AF y Vegeta AF Que Era Hermano y Caía En El Mundo De Dragon Ball Super Son Mujeres Son Goki y Princesa Vegita | Vegeta AF x Goki Super, Goku AF x Vegita Super
@@ManuelTua ?
Its good 👍 but the contexts is full of escalation without implying some record history or even storyline,the contexts thats describe on the video seemingly focus on some certain part and that's its "capabilities" without relation to how it works on all things point of view ( the very definitions and how it can be escalated through pure junction),although very absurd and overpowered to hear,i must say its partially okay. Thus,there's something that you shouldnt do,and thats by taking AMNQ2 images as references for further contexts explanations,and i think i saw " Tarr " on your video for example,and you shouldnt use that. I've warned you that using AMNQ2 characters for relation or references to upscale your given contexts is unnecessary because it can be diminished and unescalated to its already original contexts,and thus any given contexts for reference relate by focusing " more power " or make it " Consistency " enough to make sure of what it can do will be utterly hypothetical for its already original state, meaning its "dilemma" and unsure to choose. Overall,i will wait for next video and that is history,cosmology,storyline and many more by focusing plot on your character.
You need to ensure that the structural integrity of the explanation statement must be consistent enough, and avoid the escalatory descriptions and focus instead on contextual consistency. You also need to build coherent framework that requires history, cosmology, and plot-driven progression to ground the character’s essence and capabilities. Even with pure power escalation, no matter how esoteric or absurd, becomes meaningless if there is no framework-no foundation-for its existence and influence to be made.
Try establish a foundational record for the character’s presence and its role in the overarching storyline. The origin doesn’t necessarily need to be explicit, but it must imply a point of intersection with the cosmology, such as the first "rift" in reality where the character became a concept, a paradox, or an anti-concept or something you need to briefly explain in various ways.
Furthermore,you also need to create the Cosmology and Structure of Reality,to avoid arbitrary descriptions, clarify the framework of the character's "world" or existence. How does their presence relate to the greater cosmological layers? Does it reside outside all structures, or does it fracture reality from within? These points add weight and purpose to their capabilities.
Adding some Mechanism of Capabilities can further add up some rational contexts ,this is to Avoid focusing purely on raw power escalation. Instead, describe the mechanism or principle through which the character interacts with all things. Relate it to the very definitions of causality, logic, or paradox to ground its feats.
If you add Philosophical and Narrative Ties,it will be 10 times more consistent and that's by Introduce the thematic elements that connect the character’s absurd capabilities to meaningful symbolism or story progression. This ensures the description remains compelling and avoids feeling detached.
Despite that,If you want to make the character looks epic on people perspective including you,try make a plot Integration and Storyline,which's by Frame the character’s presence and capabilities within a narrative arc. How do they progress? How do their actions or existence impact the plot, cosmology, or the perspectives of others? Escalation should feel earned through story development rather than implied as inherent power.
And the most important thing you should do is Avoid the External References at all cost,this is to ensure that all descriptions and frameworks are self-contained within the story or cosmology. Using other established ideas or characters as direct references weakens the integrity and uniqueness of the concept. Focus solely on expanding your character’s lore and world.
For conclusion, make the character and its capabilities believable and consistent, focus on building a narrative foundation-its history, cosmology, mechanisms of action, and philosophical significance. Avoid arbitrary comparisons or external references, and ensure that every escalation of power ties directly into the plot progression and conceptual framework. This approach grounds even the most abstract and overpowered concepts into a coherent, engaging story structure.
I emphasize this to make sure you follow it,like usual methods or advice.
@@H45-l6bIt is very complex to make a story with cosmology, he fights with Tarr because he tried to enslave him, the beings he fought with are beings something similar to Tarr, those are fictional beings, who tried to defeat the avatar, and thanks for the information.
@@H45-l6b When I refer to existence it is fiction, or I don't know
@@AlexlepileoFiction and existence are fundamentally different concepts, though they can intersect depending on perspective or context.
they relate as:
• Fiction refers to imagined or invented realities created by human minds. These are stories, characters, worlds, and events that exist within the confines of a narrative framework, such as books, films, or other mediums of storytelling. Fiction is not "real" in a physical or existential sense but holds meaning within the human experience because of the emotions, ideas, and truths it conveys symbolically. Fictional worlds and entities are governed by rules set by their creators, and their "existence" is dependent on perception, belief, or interaction within the medium they occupy.
• Existence refers to the state of being real, present, or actual, independent of imagination or invention. It encompasses everything that is observable (physical reality), theoretical (concepts and ideas), or speculative (questions of metaphysics). In philosophy, existence is often debated in terms of what constitutes "real" and whether non-physical entities, like ideas or numbers, have existence beyond human thought. Existence can be considered universal and objective, though subjective interpretations of reality may vary.
If we determine whether existence = fiction,we need to discuss something like a debate discourse because the way you just said can be constitutely problematic.
Fictional characters and worlds "exist" within the frameworks created for them. For example, Superman exists as a fictional character in the DC Universe. While he doesn't physically exist in the material world, he has an existence defined by the rules of his fictional setting and the collective imagination of humanity.
Fictional creations can influence the real world, such as through culture, emotions, or philosophical ideas. These impacts are real and exist, but the fictional origins remain distinct from the existence of their fictional.
Some philosophies, like idealism or panpsychism, explore the idea that all reality could be a construct, potentially blurring the line between fiction and existence. Similarly, in certain speculative theories (e.g., simulation theory), what we perceive as existence could itself be a "fiction" created by a higher-level reality.
Likewise,
Fiction and existence are not the same. Fiction depends on imagination and narrative frameworks, while existence refers to the reality of being. However, fiction can "exist" as a concept or influence within reality, and philosophical debates about the nature of existence sometimes challenge where the line between the two lies.
Gusto mucho de sus videos, pero ese personaje esta hecho para puro escaling Alex, basicamente el video si resumeo en hablar que el personaje derroto y transcendeo eso y aquillo, no tiene contexto solo poder y mas poder, perdon bro pero eso no fue bueno
@@RoyalDC777 pienso darle historia
@@RoyalDC777 es solo un suposición de lo que puede hacer
@Alexlepileo Bueno, aun asi tiene mi apoyo
en efecto