JUST IN: Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Case About Disability Discrimination At Hotels
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024
- The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Acheson Hotels, LLC V. Loefler.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
![HIWWHEE | OHM [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OJJLtTLqLag/mqdefault.jpg)
Shouldn't the lower courts be hearing this case instead of this court?
Let’s be more honest with ourselves, sec Se... here Impeachment.
Title 3 would be under U.S.C. Constitution, not under common law has no jurisdiction.
Why wasn’t notify, had no ideal this took place. now many other preceding missed.
Keep mentioning harm being misled, who can
be trusted.
Landlord told the kids and I he was selling his Property?
Never rec any notice. any courts only in juvinil court..
No statutory never or don’t existed.
As a man with no legs I've been in decent brand name hotels that do not provide proper handicapped access to room bathrooms and have had to use the public one .In a hotel that cost more than 300 a night. Not to mention most rooms were filled on as needed basis and have had to wait 2 hours for them to move a non handicapped person out .also the beds were way to high up .lucky for me I was with my brother who lifted me up or else aline I would have had to sleep in my chair.
Term limits on SCOTUS NOW!
Never knew this case even existed this is not the Plaintiff, this is the victim, the husband.
Don’t want to be or any a victim.
Reason for appeal she failure to appear in court
the should of dismiss only to set aside.
Can we get some 480p for the Supreme Court? lol I can stream how cotton candy is dipped in 1080p all day. Get my people a microphone
Why Injunction for.
Not disable!
You forgot the "D"...
Injunctive relief out of question, on what grounds errors needed
be corrected.
Jaskon only knows race cases, but doesn't know what a woman is,.
Sweet Jesus 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
61
What were told plans of the qt fruit of life.
Is he trying to get them to decide on a hypothetical now??? It’s withdrawn…it’s moot. Seems like he’s trying to limit the Plaintiff from filing future cases because she spends her time looking for lawsuits for self enrichment. A vexatious litigant.
Can’t be deemed that if represented
I’m not a she we all know, he congress ?
Hotels are just for the hyper-privileged. Any questions?
Nonsense