The case is essentially determining whether or not the court has the jurisdiction to award a judgement in favor of the victim in a PPE covid-era rule violation (the victim being the second team to present), and if the court does, what that punishment should be.@@ColtonBlumhagen
@@ColtonBlumhagen it mostly sounds foreign when you don't have the actual case. Once you watch the video, unless you watch to maybe learn tactics or to analyze something you won't get much from the actual case🙂
I don’t know how someone could ever go and have the floor to present an argument in front of that massive audience and a Supreme Court justice without completely breaking down from nerves, especially someone who’s new to the field, hats off!
As a computer teacher honestly, Most people arent really focusing on what your saying but wondering what they will do in your place. especially during an examination such as this. Speaking in front of teenagers for years you kinda loose that grip of anxiety. Also really knowing your material helps immensely.
I could not handle the level of intense and immediate grilling from the judges. My anxiety would go through the roof. These students killed it… im so impressed.
Agreed! Justice Liu was especially tough... he reminded me of a great university professor that asks the tough questions to help his students think on their feet and go the extra mile in order to grow and learn. Bravo to both teams
Explanation: The Moot Court Competition at Harvard Law School was debating a fictional case involving the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and a company called Federici Contracting. This was all part of a practice exercise (moot court) for law students to sharpen their legal argument skills, not a real case. Here's a simple explanation of the key points: 1) OSHA made a new rule requiring construction companies with over 100 employees to hire a personal protective equipment coordinator. 2) Federici Contracting sued OSHA, saying they didn't have the authority to make this rule. 3) The main questions the students were debating were: a) When a court finds that an agency (like OSHA) has made a rule that goes beyond its authority, does the law require the court to cancel (vacate) that rule completely? b) If the law does require courts to cancel such rules, is this requirement constitutional? Does it give courts more power than they should have under the Constitution?
I'm so proud of all these people. The countless hours of hard work, preparation, thoughtful discourse and commitment to excellence are apparent across the board. Bravo.
This what I aspire to be. Im still in my undergraduate degree and Im taking a public speaking class in the fall and I'm tackling this class fangs and claws out, ambitious to get out of my shell so I can be a person like these people are!! I'm watching this as an inspiration to keep doing well to potentially get into Harvard Law. amazing work guys!
Good luck! I have taken many speaking classes and I did not go in with the gusto you have, so that’s why I’m still terrible at it. 😂You’ve got this!! ❤️
Learning the law is a slow, thinking process. It is one of those things that when you read a case for the first time, you have to read it very slowly. Once you get the hang of it, then you can navigate between cases, etc.
I love this. I have no idea what they are talking about but I find myself so engaged in this debate and the reactions of the students behind the people arguing their positions.
Tbh, I was never really interested in laws or politics until the Supreme Court overturned Roe V Wade. Since then, I've been listening to experts, judges, and people in this field. I'm thinking about going back to school to study law as well.
@@dianacaa Yes but the interruptions were too frequent. When making an argument, that can really disrupt your rhythm and flow and make you forget your words or point
As someone who competed for the undergrad AMCA moot court competition, most people cannot recite a heavily complicated legal argument for 10+ minutes straight, especially with no notes. That's why it takes roughly 8+ months of preparation for competitions, it's challenging. Compared to interruptions, reciting is actually much harder and called a "dead bench" because of no interaction with the Justices. Time moves slowly and you need enough content to cover the allotted time you're given. Due to the amount of research you put in the cases supporting your argument, it's actually much easier to answer these questions off the cuff, and weave them into your argument roadmap. I'd like to see you try it sometime. 😄
@@prettyclassyladyOGtheir whole point I think is that they’re not idiots, and them interrupting is showcasing that because the students can think quickly on their feet, therefore demonstrating real court readiness and prowess not just rehearsal.
When Justice Sotomayor said "You will reach even greater heights than me" I feel like thats a bit hard considering... she's literally on the Supreme Court😅
The Supreme Court is only the highest you can go if you don't explore other options :) The grass is always greener on the otherside I'm sure some of the Justices secretly wish they were doing something else.
Been studying law for 3 years now and this is the first time I’ve ever watched a mooting competition. I’m already nervous and I just started the video!
Congratulations to both teams! I also enjoy getting exposure to more judges through these videos. I hope Judge Paul Oetken participates as a judge soon.
Awesome and insightful moot. Got to learn so many things and amount of research both teams put in, is just awe inspiring. No wonder Harvard Law is class apart.
What an outstanding group of young people and bright minds. It is unimaginably nerve-wracking to present an argument and think on your feet in front of an actual SCOTUS justice. The commitment to excellence and the thorough preparation by these future lawyers just speaks to the standards of Harvard Law. Just bravo!
I realize it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, but I can't help but remark on how reasonable, measured and in some cases compelling the people making these arguments are, in contrast to the lunacy that is modern day college debate.
I can't help but think of the TV show "Suits" when watching Harvard Law students debate. My thought is that they will all go to Wall Street to become corporate lawyers.
Very, very well done. Highly impressed. By saying what I'm about to, am I in no means putting down this great accomplishment and their talents; it's easier to prepare a brief and oral arguments when this is your only case to prepare. The true test is out in the real world when you have multiple cases on your desk. Multiple cases means multiple briefs and arguments to prepare all at the same time. It is much more challenging mentally, emotionally, and psychologically. Got to balance your time. Now, throw family into the mix; need I say more? Again, congratulations and best of luck!
Who's watching in 2024? If you are, consider yourself in the top 5% of the top legal TH-cam audience because the algorithm sensed your attraction to a Supreme Court simulation "situation," such as this. Congratulations. 5 years from now, we could be watching a similarly orchestrated competition with the speakers beamed inside our office or wherever we're watching from. 4.5 million viewer's have made another Harvard Law School competition from 4 years ago, viral. Some of us watching this year will become Judges, Supreme Court justices and or in politics. Either way 💯 consider yourself chosen, in the realm of law. I rest my case. 😊
I love anything legal! I also have a book of essential Supreme Court cases with summaries. I innately love numbers, but I love reading court transcripts and law books all day.
I'm only a 1st year at law school looking to do moots in my second year. And God the grilling that the judges gave out was insane hahaha. Hope I cam do just as good as these guys.
That student was actually my favorite oralist. I appreciate his slow and deliberate manner of speaking. He wasn't in a rush to get his point across but rather focused on making sure his points were understood and well placed
@@genesisshollins9326I think it’s more of a matter of respect . You speaking to well renowned judges so you shouldn’t have such a casual look with hands in pocket but I think he is doing it to calm his nerves since it is very scary being grilled
The Zone of Permissibility’ is actually a very specific type of area that sets up the rules by which the ‘injury suffered’ and the remedy that is to be applied can be measured.
i'm a cleaner by trade, but for some reason i come to watch this because watching very intelligent people in action is just very fascinating for a caveman like myself😁
I'm Brazilian, I admire the attitude of the American court judges, they certainly put on a show with their performances. The Brazilian court currently finds the situation regrettable. Hats off to the American court judges. I loved this video, great inspiration for me. Show.🥰🥰🥰
Hey can you please tell me during the when the denial represent the petitioner put their hand in pocket before the Hon’ble Court is this right or not in America because in India this type of act insulting of the Court
I guess the girl sitting to the left of the speaking guy is his friend, girlfriend or something cause see she's just soo happy to see him talking so firmly and smirks
The intelligence and poise of these lawyers to be are certainly impressive. Let's pray that they don't apply their extra-ordinary talents to evil causes like Josh Hawley, Elise Stepanik, Ted Cruz....
The injunctive relief remedy that the Courts have as part of their authority to regulate the use of the’Vacater statutes mentioned in Section 706 and Section 703😂😮.
Raise your hand if this came up in your recommended and you have no clue what's happening but still watched the whole thing.
It’s a mock trial for Harvard Law School students simulating a Supreme Court hearing.
@@AbundantChris I know that lol. As far as what they're arguing, that is what I didn't get.
The case is essentially determining whether or not the court has the jurisdiction to award a judgement in favor of the victim in a PPE covid-era rule violation (the victim being the second team to present), and if the court does, what that punishment should be.@@ColtonBlumhagen
@@ColtonBlumhagen it mostly sounds foreign when you don't have the actual case. Once you watch the video, unless you watch to maybe learn tactics or to analyze something you won't get much from the actual case🙂
@@AbundantChris you dont say
I don’t know how someone could ever go and have the floor to present an argument in front of that massive audience and a Supreme Court justice without completely breaking down from nerves, especially someone who’s new to the field, hats off!
When you study, practice, and know God, it’s easy, because you realize Supreme Court Justices are ‘man’ and flawed, as we all are.
F it. We are going to die one day. Just go balls out in life. You only have one life
If you want people to take you seriously, you need to act like you own the place.
As a computer teacher honestly, Most people arent really focusing on what your saying but wondering what they will do in your place. especially during an examination such as this. Speaking in front of teenagers for years you kinda loose that grip of anxiety. Also really knowing your material helps immensely.
It’s not hard just practice a few times. My first time was rough but after a while it became natural
I could not handle the level of intense and immediate grilling from the judges. My anxiety would go through the roof. These students killed it… im so impressed.
Agreed! Justice Liu was especially tough... he reminded me of a great university professor that asks the tough questions to help his students think on their feet and go the extra mile in order to grow and learn. Bravo to both teams
I'm not a crybaby, but I might become one that day.
Its actually very easy, their questions are also predictable. Theres nothing to be impressed.
Because you are weak
exactly! their confidence is commendable.
Explanation:
The Moot Court Competition at Harvard Law School was debating a fictional case involving the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and a company called Federici Contracting. This was all part of a practice exercise (moot court) for law students to sharpen their legal argument skills, not a real case.
Here's a simple explanation of the key points:
1) OSHA made a new rule requiring construction companies with over 100 employees to hire a personal protective equipment coordinator.
2) Federici Contracting sued OSHA, saying they didn't have the authority to make this rule.
3) The main questions the students were debating were:
a) When a court finds that an agency (like OSHA) has made a rule that goes beyond its authority, does the law require the court to cancel (vacate) that rule completely?
b) If the law does require courts to cancel such rules, is this requirement constitutional? Does it give courts more power than they should have under the Constitution?
Very helpful
Thanks
I'm so proud of all these people. The countless hours of hard work, preparation, thoughtful discourse and commitment to excellence are apparent across the board. Bravo.
Too bad all legitimate firms will refuse to hire these disgusting antisemites
SUPREME COURT JUDGES FOR MOOT COURT COMPETITIONS! this is terrifying.
To bring up Many more Supreme Court Judges who are better, more just and critical in their judgement
@@Ugh99 such as? lol
@@kaybay5210 You just saw them in the video
whaaaaaaaaaat hats off, my anxiety would kill me , my legs would be dancing and my face would be burning besides my shaking hands
This what I aspire to be. Im still in my undergraduate degree and Im taking a public speaking class in the fall and I'm tackling this class fangs and claws out, ambitious to get out of my shell so I can be a person like these people are!! I'm watching this as an inspiration to keep doing well to potentially get into Harvard Law. amazing work guys!
You got this!! I'll be rooting for you in spirit!! 🫶
Good luck! I have taken many speaking classes and I did not go in with the gusto you have, so that’s why I’m still terrible at it. 😂You’ve got this!! ❤️
Here for the vocabulary but as always I'M STUNNED by the brilliance.
Hats off to all the speakers. You really did an amazing job. You made it as if it's not an intense conversation in front of the experts.
Hats off to the Harvard bigots
@@Matt67012it’s always that one person who has a problem with everything
Thank you ♥
As a professor, it would be a great honor to have students as polished as these!
I dont know about me, but my friend who got 85% for mooting comp only got c plus for the same subject, soooooo, it depends
and in reality its different@@adamharrold407
well polish them!
Is it the Professor’s duty to polish the students?
yes it is@@pulee1001
I did not understand a single word that came out of their mouths, but I loved it! Also, watching people getting cold-called is exhilarating!
Learning the law is a slow, thinking process. It is one of those things that when you read a case for the first time, you have to read it very slowly. Once you get the hang of it, then you can navigate between cases, etc.
I love this. I have no idea what they are talking about but I find myself so engaged in this debate and the reactions of the students behind the people arguing their positions.
I’m so glad I’m not the only one who doesn’t know what’s being said.
Haha.....I just don't have any idea about what they are talking about...
Wow. The preparation from these students (both sides) really shows! It makes me excited about beginning law school soon.
Tbh, I was never really interested in laws or politics until the Supreme Court overturned Roe V Wade. Since then, I've been listening to experts, judges, and people in this field. I'm thinking about going back to school to study law as well.
@@KingOfThePirates101are you in law school now? Going to law school is too expensive.
If I got interrupted after every sentence like that I'd probably lose my mind
Especially when you are on a roll and then you have to backtrack or you lose your train of through so quickly.
I'm sure they did that to make sure that these people don't recite a script, and that it's genuine
@@anakinjmanu Exactly!
@@dianacaa Yes but the interruptions were too frequent. When making an argument, that can really disrupt your rhythm and flow and make you forget your words or point
@haniyaya ik that but I'm just saying
I like that they interrupt so soon. Any idiot can recite a perfectly rehearsed speech, they actually have to think on their feet.
I mean, most actual appellate course judges will interrupt quite quickly. They've already read the brief, they want to get to questions quickly
No need to call them idiots
As someone who competed for the undergrad AMCA moot court competition, most people cannot recite a heavily complicated legal argument for 10+ minutes straight, especially with no notes. That's why it takes roughly 8+ months of preparation for competitions, it's challenging. Compared to interruptions, reciting is actually much harder and called a "dead bench" because of no interaction with the Justices. Time moves slowly and you need enough content to cover the allotted time you're given. Due to the amount of research you put in the cases supporting your argument, it's actually much easier to answer these questions off the cuff, and weave them into your argument roadmap. I'd like to see you try it sometime. 😄
These people definitely aren’t idiots….
@@prettyclassyladyOGtheir whole point I think is that they’re not idiots, and them interrupting is showcasing that because the students can think quickly on their feet, therefore demonstrating real court readiness and prowess not just rehearsal.
I love the composure and confidence of the students as they speak to these prominent legal figures
When Justice Sotomayor said "You will reach even greater heights than me" I feel like thats a bit hard considering... she's literally on the Supreme Court😅
I think she meant the US President / Vice President, Chief Justice Supreme Court or House Speaker.
The Supreme Court is only the highest you can go if you don't explore other options :) The grass is always greener on the otherside I'm sure some of the Justices secretly wish they were doing something else.
@@nateo200She could mean reaching Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
where did she say that?
1:24:15 !! :)@@simplyeason
Why is no one talking about Richard Dunn... That man is gonna go so far. Best oralist I've seen in any of the recent Ames Moot competitions!!
Been studying law for 3 years now and this is the first time I’ve ever watched a mooting competition. I’m already nervous and I just started the video!
You a 3L?
I will be mooting in 3 days I'm in grade 10
@@moonstruck7621 omg good luck!!! You’re gonna ace it!!
@@FlorenceDjana thank youu❤ I hope I do...I will remember to tell you the results
@@FlorenceDjana we got semi finals
Congratulations to both teams! I also enjoy getting exposure to more judges through these videos. I hope Judge Paul Oetken participates as a judge soon.
if I was there I would probably have a panic attack 1 minute into my introductory speech. 😅
1 minute is probably too ambitious
@@meXmydreamstrue. The judges put them on their backfoot immediately after their introduction.
I would have tried to speak, but instead would have thrown up all over the microphone
Awesome and insightful moot. Got to learn so many things and amount of research both teams put in, is just awe inspiring. No wonder Harvard Law is class apart.
38:35 AWWWW the little note he passes her and the fist bump she gives him, sooo cute !!
😂😂😂
😍🥰☺️
Finally we can watch Ames Moot Court Competition 2023 version!! Am so gladd
Am a south sudanese citizen study law at starford International university, south Sudan, am so glad the amazing moot cote
I don't don't think that the lady who fainted and kept going can ever be topped.
Right!!!!!!
Just came from that video! Incredible stuff
Where do I find this video
What an outstanding group of young people and bright minds. It is unimaginably nerve-wracking to present an argument and think on your feet in front of an actual SCOTUS justice. The commitment to excellence and the thorough preparation by these future lawyers just speaks to the standards of Harvard Law. Just bravo!
I'm not even into law and I don't even understand any of these, but it's quite inspiring lol
I realize it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, but I can't help but remark on how reasonable, measured and in some cases compelling the people making these arguments are, in contrast to the lunacy that is modern day college debate.
You are a great person to instruct to do and to get the right pursuit of justice ⚖️ thank you for your service
first time observed this court, impressed and inspirational
What breaks my heart, is that, we humans can be so rational and logical and yet rationality is subdued in this cruel real world for self interests.
I love your English! Learnt a few words. Are you an English native speaker?
Life is hard , wear helmet
Self - and self interests are the key words
@@Deny-defend-depose agree, but what they said is true though.
Humans rational and logical. That is funny.
👏👏👏👏 as a law student, this moot was great, full of knowledge, skilled & inspiring to me
I am not a lawyer, I don't know why this was suggested to me, but DAMN Justice Liu.. that man is handsome!
he's like so neat and clean, sophisticated, and handsome
I can't help but think of the TV show "Suits" when watching Harvard Law students debate. My thought is that they will all go to Wall Street to become corporate lawyers.
Very, very well done. Highly impressed. By saying what I'm about to, am I in no means putting down this great accomplishment and their talents; it's easier to prepare a brief and oral arguments when this is your only case to prepare. The true test is out in the real world when you have multiple cases on your desk. Multiple cases means multiple briefs and arguments to prepare all at the same time. It is much more challenging mentally, emotionally, and psychologically. Got to balance your time. Now, throw family into the mix; need I say more? Again, congratulations and best of luck!
The judges are really tough!
Its Harvard. A Harvard degree is well earned.
@@C2828ccDo it if you can let's see
This is beautiful to watch. Very educational
Gotta love a hot bench! The advocate handled this very well.
The teams are so good. Congrats to all.
Watching this with my thourough knowledge of Legal System (i only watched Suits)
😂😂same here.
Lol im with you
Same I’m very qualified in this field. (I watched Better Call Saul)
I guess I beat you guys. I watched them both. A couple times 😂😂
😂
I got anxiety watching this but I kept watching 😅
Who's watching in 2024? If you are, consider yourself in the top 5% of the top legal TH-cam audience because the algorithm sensed your attraction to a Supreme Court simulation "situation," such as this. Congratulations. 5 years from now, we could be watching a similarly orchestrated competition with the speakers beamed inside our office or wherever we're watching from. 4.5 million viewer's have made another Harvard Law School competition from 4 years ago, viral. Some of us watching this year will become Judges, Supreme Court justices and or in politics. Either way 💯 consider yourself chosen, in the realm of law. I rest my case. 😊
I love anything legal! I also have a book of essential Supreme Court cases with summaries. I innately love numbers, but I love reading court transcripts and law books all day.
@@Subliminalmessage78Thank you. I can relate. I love numbers. Where can I get this book of Supreme Court cases?
I wanted to be a prosecutor and or a detective. 😢 I had so much promise just financially and mentally no support
@@KrysGrant-ey1xlKeep your hopes up, Krys! Life is sometimes full of surprises. As you think, you are.
@@Subliminalmessage78may you give me some recomendation supremacy of books law?
I'm only a 1st year at law school looking to do moots in my second year. And God the grilling that the judges gave out was insane hahaha. Hope I cam do just as good as these guys.
To the first speaker, dont put your hand in your pocket when speaking to the judges hahaah
That student was actually my favorite oralist. I appreciate his slow and deliberate manner of speaking. He wasn't in a rush to get his point across but rather focused on making sure his points were understood and well placed
@@jeremiahmathews1650 I liked his tone too but sticking your hand in your pocket is a big nono
@@LDTunDo you mind me asking why? I’m not in the law field and am just genuinely curious lolol
@@genesisshollins9326 probably too causal
@@genesisshollins9326I think it’s more of a matter of respect . You speaking to well renowned judges so you shouldn’t have such a casual look with hands in pocket but I think he is doing it to calm his nerves since it is very scary being grilled
The Zone of Permissibility’ is actually a very specific type of area that sets up the rules by which the ‘injury suffered’ and the remedy that is to be applied can be measured.
due to the prosecutors allegation not having relevant evidence to support the accusation, my client remains innocent of this alleged crime.
i'm a cleaner by trade, but for some reason i come to watch this because watching very intelligent people in action is just very fascinating for a caveman like myself😁
This is a great discussion.
These students are brilliant.
This is so intimidating
What an amazing issue and great arguments!! What a pivotal conversation, especially after overturning Chevron
The Dir may friend, ⚖️🍀🚨🇺🇸.
I’d hire Dick Dunn just from that flow he’s got working up top. He has potential for some great slogans if he decides to start his own practice.
I like the composure of counsel.
It's recommended to me to watch! Im watching. I feel accomplished and bright even if my IQ is lower than theirs🤣🤣🤣
Preparation is key, it shows that teams have prepared well.
I love this never will i forget this day live
Can someone help explain the case at hand or is there another video about that?
Up to the mark...
Very interesting
Thanks, remembering too my own uniUtrecht/Aula-Debating 50yrs ago
I think that Section 706 contains the language that references the word ‘set aside’ as meaning to enjoin or to vacate😮😅.
Justice Liu is scrumptious. 😍
Until I'm put subtitle on then I'm get this great discussion their English is very impressive and deep to understand..
How are they all so flawless and so eloquent 😢?
I'm Brazilian, I admire the attitude of the American court judges, they certainly put on a show with their performances. The Brazilian court currently finds the situation regrettable. Hats off to the American court judges. I loved this video, great inspiration for me. Show.🥰🥰🥰
The application of the law is broad enough that it can cover the types of injuries that are suffered by the victims in this case 😮.
Any friend please tell me, I have failed in one subject, should I go ahead or not for a bigger law degree
Ahh my favorite video of the year is back
this video is a history
I'm sticking with HTGAWM
Hey can you please tell me during the when the denial represent the petitioner put their hand in pocket before the Hon’ble Court is this right or not in America because in India this type of act insulting of the Court
It's is not denial ,we called it plaintiff 😂
I am speechless....
Id immediately cry on the first grill... props to everyone
I guess the girl sitting to the left of the speaking guy is his friend, girlfriend or something cause see she's just soo happy to see him talking so firmly and smirks
Omg, l just graduated from middle, but l want to study for law from now on
This was really intense!!😮💨
The intelligence and poise of these lawyers to be are certainly impressive. Let's pray that they don't apply their extra-ordinary talents to evil causes like Josh Hawley, Elise Stepanik, Ted Cruz....
all of these students are far more intelligent than josh Hawley and ted cruz.
@@jakobvogel6764and hopefully they use it for good like David suggests. It’d be a shame if he turned out to be another Josh Hawley
I saw a bunch of suits clips and now I am here
The definition of a ‘class action suit’ involves the following factors that affect all of the parties in the suit as being injured or harmed 😮😢.
they're really just saying words like i could never be a lawyer I'm such a bad bullshitter
It’s not just words, it’s civil procedure and if you learn it in law school you know exactly what to say. Plus you prepare
Just cause you don't understand the words doesn't mean it's bullshit 😭
@@mamaobama7132
I think they meant there way of talking is bad lol ( idk of that made sense x.x )
The question of whether the Appeals Court has jurisdiction to hear the case that is being presented before it is a good question to ponder 😂😢😮.
I was thinking of directing my business masters degree towards law but after this, NO THANKS! 😂😂
watching harvard moot courts give me another level of motivation
I can’t wait to be a law student
...love this very educational
The injunctive relief remedy that the Courts have as part of their authority to regulate the use of the’Vacater statutes mentioned in Section 706 and Section 703😂😮.
great involvement guys cheers for future
Is beautiful educational law in this ❤❤
im intrigued the moment they mentioned occupational safety and health, US OSHA, and department of labor cuz thats what my degree is for
SO what are they arguing? That the "court" shouldn't preside over a specific case?
The rule that is being described is the ‘Equitable Relief’ or ‘Remedy’😅.
His is cool, almost better than watching a law/court movie ❤
It feels like they're speaking a whole different language!
Daniel Flesch being iconic for 17 minutes
I love this memory
Great
I am groot. Groot Moot.😊