Hello Dr, I thank you for the video. One question, can use this method for developing a scale, is it right. Or, Should I keep all the constructs in full or I can use the imputed variable. Thank you
You can use this approach to validate the higher order factor, but then I would recommend to return to the full HOC model when testing the structural model.
Hi Dr. Gaskin I have downloaded the latest version of SmartPLS4 (v 4.1.0.6) and I can't seem to access R^2. In the left hand side-bar it goes 'model fit' and then 'construct reliability and validity' whereas your version has R^2. Under the bottom half of the left hand side-bar I can select R^2 under construct, where you have AVE, but when I do that, nothing shows. Odd. I wonder why this would be? - Is there a way to derive R^2 from AVE? - Could you explain the difference between them? Thanks!
Make sure you are not bootstrapping. The R-square only shows up for bootstrap if you select Complete results (slower) in the setup. R-square also won't show up if you don't have any endogenous variables. R-square is the variance explained in the endogenous variable by its predictors. AVE is the average squared loading of indicators.
@@Gaskination Thank you. For my measurement model, I didn't use the CB-SEM Bootstrap, I just ran the normal algorithm and as mentioned, no R-Square was shown which now makes sense. When I ran the structural model, I got the R-Square value. Is there any scenario where I would HAVE to run the CB-SEM bootstrap or is it fine for me to just run the normal algorithm?
Thanks. Do we then report the beta coefficient from the basic CB-SEM algorithm along with the p-values/significance values from the bootstrap or do we just report all the bootstrap data?
Thank you very much Prof. Gaskin
We are grateful for this scholarly video.
Thanks Prof. You never disappoint us.
Thanks again, Prof, for sharing great content
Hello Dr,
I thank you for the video.
One question, can use this method for developing a scale, is it right.
Or, Should I keep all the constructs in full or I can use the imputed variable.
Thank you
You can use this approach to validate the higher order factor, but then I would recommend to return to the full HOC model when testing the structural model.
Hi Dr. Gaskin
I have downloaded the latest version of SmartPLS4 (v 4.1.0.6) and I can't seem to access R^2. In the left hand side-bar it goes 'model fit' and then 'construct reliability and validity' whereas your version has R^2. Under the bottom half of the left hand side-bar I can select R^2 under construct, where you have AVE, but when I do that, nothing shows. Odd. I wonder why this would be?
- Is there a way to derive R^2 from AVE?
- Could you explain the difference between them?
Thanks!
Make sure you are not bootstrapping. The R-square only shows up for bootstrap if you select Complete results (slower) in the setup. R-square also won't show up if you don't have any endogenous variables. R-square is the variance explained in the endogenous variable by its predictors. AVE is the average squared loading of indicators.
@@Gaskination Thank you. For my measurement model, I didn't use the CB-SEM Bootstrap, I just ran the normal algorithm and as mentioned, no R-Square was shown which now makes sense. When I ran the structural model, I got the R-Square value. Is there any scenario where I would HAVE to run the CB-SEM bootstrap or is it fine for me to just run the normal algorithm?
@@TUPhDude Bootstrapping gives you p-values for indirect effects. It also gives you more robust estimates all around.
Thanks. Do we then report the beta coefficient from the basic CB-SEM algorithm along with the p-values/significance values from the bootstrap or do we just report all the bootstrap data?
@@TUPhDude Report the bootstrap data
Dear sir, can you advise any thesis paper link which analysis is done through smart Pls 4 PLS SEM??
I don't know of any yet, though there must be some. I don't have doctoral students in my college, so I cannot refer you to one of my own.