The game has issues with VRAM leaks, highly fluctuating FPS, and, for example, at 1080p Low without a VRAM leak, you can get up to 25 FPS. However, at any moment when a VRAM leak occurs, it can drop to 10 FPS or even 5 in some demanding sections. VRAM leaks are completely random, and I can't fix or do anything to help in that situation. If I ever find a solution, I’ll share it, of course, but for now, it is what it is... On GPUs with 6GB of VRAM and more no problem. RTX 3060 Ti | S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 Heart of Chornobyl th-cam.com/video/meg_ZejcO0Y/w-d-xo.html
config file [/Script/Engine.RendererSettings] r.Streaming.PoolSize=3000 can try play with different values.. obviously if games settings are not locked.
Even making the game look worse than the original trilogy doesn't fix the awful performance... Well done, GSC. They had to postpone this game for another 2 years
@@kenn1ld676 Silent Hill 2 ran fine on mine, even with fsr the graphics wasn't bad and the framerate was good. With that said you're not wrong about 4gb days being countered but Stalker 2 doesn't run good even on a 4090
@@Tomas91709 If 1100$ rig for 1080p medium 60fps whit upscaling tech and FG is not bad for u then u pretty much have to educate urself way more before commenting
@@ekislav1914lol they obviously ripped you off with that 1100 dollar rig. Im on a 3070 and 1080p high is buttery smooth 60fps, maybe even more, didnt check cause i capped it
@@mauriciohiure2192 Give up your hopes, they made the game for 6 years, and they had 3 months after the last postponing the game release date to fix bugs and optimize
@@mauriciohiure2192 are you kidding? the game runs 60 fps at least at low settings on video cards 3 generations younger. this is quite normal optimization
@@kotikkoty6649 bro... every damn review i've watched so far the reviewer makes sure to highlight how trash the optimization for the game is and how buggy it is, maybe you're not noticing this much because pretty much every game nowadays launches horribly, but this one definitely takes the cake
no lol maybe after half year it will get 10-20% boost but still 1650 is too weak too old for new UE5 games thats for sure and 1650 was never good for gaming anyways 1660 was different story even 3060 i would consider old at this point and kinda too bad for UE 5 games we need rtx5 series
@@Jasontvnd9 Computer has one graphics card, so the vram is also used by the system. Laptop uses an integrated card for the system and programs, so Vram in dedicated graphics is free.
Vjerovao ili ne na RTX 3060 Ti ide 35-40 FPS na 4K sa DLSS Q i High podesavanja... VRAM je ovde problem, na 4GB VRAM grafickim ne ide nikako... Za razliku od drugih igara koji su na UE5, ova najmanje stutters ima.
FSR 3.1 Performance + FG это технология от amd, которая улучшает производительность и плавность в играх. fsr, это, упрощенно говоря, способ увеличить fps за счет того, что игра рендерится в низком разрешении, а потом картинка улучшает качество с помощью алгоритмов. режим performance рендерит игру в очень низком разрешении, примерно 25% от финального, чтобы максимально повысить fps. это хорошо, если тебе важна скорость, а не идеальное качество картинки. fg, или frame generation, это генерация дополнительных кадров между уже рендеренными кадрами, чтобы еще больше увеличить плавность в игре. fg использует алгоритмы, чтобы предсказывать и создавать дополнительные кадры, то есть тебе кажется, что игра работает быстрее, чем на самом деле. fsr 3.1 performance + fg, это комбинация этих двух технологий: сначала увеличивается fps за счет низкого рендера, а потом добавляются новые кадры для еще большей плавности, но из-за этого качество картинки может быть хуже, чем в стандартных режимах...
@@Psychol-sg7ss Oh yeah, I watched a bunch of Stalker GPU tests today and one was a 1660ti, it was at 20fps with everything low with dips into 8 fps like crazy. Even my 4060 struggles a bit from what I see, I would have to play at 1080p high for a stable 60fps with DLSS on. The game needs patches though, it has issues.
LOOKS BETTER EVEN IN LOW RESOLUTION ON GTX1650(MY OLDER PC HAS GTX1650 I5 9400F 16GB 2666MHZ)AND MY NEWER RTX3060 I5 12400F 16GB 3200MHZ SO WILL TRY IT ON BOTH PC(JUST USE A EXTERNAL SSD SO I DONT NEED TO DOWNLOAD IT 2 TIMES THOUGH)
hi. On 1650 16gb and amd ryzen 4600h the game can give good fps. but the problem is in optimization, some shadows that load the system and plus an unknown leak. I was able to play at 60-70 fps on low quality balance, well at least 50 if they optimized... but because of the leak the fps drops to 8-25 fps. I had to reboot and everything is fine again, but after a while this shitty leak again. I will wait a month and see in the end how the developer will do anything at all
Disappointing as I said. Not everyone can afford cool graphics cards as usual. My 1650 won't pull it off based on benchmarks. Shame. The game looks cool on ultra settings. I'm bummed.
@@manuelwolfsberger2345 Yes, its a mix of mid/high setting, FSR3 on and i can play around 80 fps while exploring, there are some stutters and drops in crowded areas but it's playable EDIT: Im sorry i thought it was about 1080Ti from start, my bad, my experience is on 1080Ti, sorry
game is so fucking buggy and horribly optimized it's insane lol, even when it says it's running at a decent fps it still feels slow af, and btw why is it using more than 16gb ram when they recommended it for at least minimum? this lowkey gotta be the worst optimized game of this generation
Turn of frame generation. Also if there is more ram the game is going to use more ram it's a good thing that the game uses more ram than just letting your extra ram go to waste 😂
@qlintenFX i never saw any game of this generation using damn near 20gb of ram but ok, and it was still running like shit nonetheless so there's that lol
GTX 1060 and RX 580 is approximately %30 faster than GTX 1650, so at least GTX 1650 can see 20 FPS. According to minimum requirements which they say 1080p low 30 FPS but VRAM is main issue looks like. What a poor optimization.
GTX 1060 and RX 580 is approximately %30 faster than GTX 1650, so at least GTX 1650 can see 20 FPS at least and 24 as average. According to minimum requirements which they say 1080p low 30 FPS but VRAM is main issue looks like. What a poor optimization.
The game has issues with VRAM leaks, highly fluctuating FPS, and, for example, at 1080p Low without a VRAM leak, you can get up to 25 FPS. However, at any moment when a VRAM leak occurs, it can drop to 10 FPS or even 5 in some demanding sections. VRAM leaks are completely random, and I can't fix or do anything to help in that situation. If I ever find a solution, I’ll share it, of course, but for now, it is what it is...
On GPUs with 6GB of VRAM and more no problem.
RTX 3060 Ti | S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 Heart of Chornobyl
th-cam.com/video/meg_ZejcO0Y/w-d-xo.html
what is the vram leak ?
config file
[/Script/Engine.RendererSettings]
r.Streaming.PoolSize=3000
can try play with different values.. obviously if games settings are not locked.
Denuvo?!
@@Nightek1 there is no denuvo
The days of 4GB VRAM being enough are over.
yes, it looks like the first blow for me was Space Marine 2
No, the days of 8GB are over.
me still using gtx 1050 2gb 😭
hasn't it been over for a while?
Vram is kinda hiccup
Even making the game look worse than the original trilogy doesn't fix the awful performance... Well done, GSC. They had to postpone this game for another 2 years
I mean the major issue is UE5 and how 99% of studios seem to think that instead of doing anykind of optimization DLSS will fix it.
You can't expect to play a unreal engine 5 game with good graphics on a 1650 graphics card.
@@kenn1ld676 Silent Hill 2 ran fine on mine, even with fsr the graphics wasn't bad and the framerate was good.
With that said you're not wrong about 4gb days being countered but Stalker 2 doesn't run good even on a 4090
no the game looks beatuiful on high spec its just runs shit on a 1650 super
@@ph-fi7qo SH2 was not open world unlike Stalker 2 besides SH2 had fog hiding a lot of stuff which helped the performance I bet
i wonder if this game wins "most unoptimized game of the year"?
Its not that bad
@@Tomas91709 in terms of optimization Or just the game itself?
@@Tomas91709 If 1100$ rig for 1080p medium 60fps whit upscaling tech and FG is not bad for u then u pretty much have to educate urself way more before commenting
@@ekislav1914lol they obviously ripped you off with that 1100 dollar rig. Im on a 3070 and 1080p high is buttery smooth 60fps, maybe even more, didnt check cause i capped it
@ekislav1914 1100????? My guy my 3060ti and i5 12600k is not worth that much 1440p medium
RIP gtx 1650🥺🥺🥺
gotta wait some patches to say shit like this, even high end GPUs are struggling with this game, trash optimization
It was dead long ago
@@mauriciohiure2192 Give up your hopes, they made the game for 6 years, and they had 3 months after the last postponing the game release date to fix bugs and optimize
@@mauriciohiure2192 are you kidding? the game runs 60 fps at least at low settings on video cards 3 generations younger. this is quite normal optimization
@@kotikkoty6649 bro... every damn review i've watched so far the reviewer makes sure to highlight how trash the optimization for the game is and how buggy it is, maybe you're not noticing this much because pretty much every game nowadays launches horribly, but this one definitely takes the cake
Thanks for this video, I have a 1650 and I was interested in how the game would work. Thanks a lot!
looks like we should wait for a few months at the very least. it's cyberpunk all over again
Cyberpunk didn't have this trash ass performance at launch, it was just buggy and missing a lot of features, which this game also is
Bro the 1650 is less than the minimal requirements
@@melodiasrojas8428 I don't care. With good optimization it should provide at least 25 fps, not 5 fps
@@melodiasrojas8428 i have rx 6600 though, it runs ok with it but the game is still in a pretty bad state. it's like it's in early access.
Dude, it's 2024. We shouldn't be playing 720p for a barely stable experience. Thanks stalker 2
It’s a gtx 1650. It was a shit card even 6 years ago
Playing on a low end GPU from 5 years ago this is expected.
You can pick up a 1660 for about $30 used that will manage this game at low settings.
unfortunately the game is unplayable on 1650. Will they optimize the game for 1650? What do you think?
no lol maybe after half year it will get 10-20% boost but still 1650 is too weak too old for new UE5 games thats for sure and 1650 was never good for gaming anyways 1660 was different story
even 3060 i would consider old at this point and kinda too bad for UE 5 games
we need rtx5 series
can you try running in dx11?
i Will try
Au brate moj, meni ce gtx 1050 ti pregoreti, moram probati na 720p low
720p is okay, the gameplay is more important than beautiful graphs
If the laptop has clean vram, Can it perform better?
It can perform worse not better… sry man
The fuck is clean vram? 😅
@@Jasontvnd9 Computer has one graphics card, so the vram is also used by the system. Laptop uses an integrated card for the system and programs, so Vram in dedicated graphics is free.
@@jakubkustosik5057The system is using negligible amounts of Vram , it will barely make a difference.
4GB is 4GB....it's below minimum requirements.
Gracias, buen trabajo, como siempre.
@edwardbenchmarks please test with gtx 1060
How this game work in rtx2060?
It will be video for 2h
@@edwardbenchmarks Thanks bro
Toliko sam dugo cekao igru da bi video da mi treba bild od 1100e da bi igrao 1080p medium 60fps.Ja mislim da je UE5 izgubio svaki smisao
Vjerovao ili ne na RTX 3060 Ti ide 35-40 FPS na 4K sa DLSS Q i High podesavanja... VRAM je ovde problem, na 4GB VRAM grafickim ne ide nikako... Za razliku od drugih igara koji su na UE5, ova najmanje stutters ima.
объясните что значит fsr 3.1 p+FG
FSR 3.1 Performance + FG это технология от amd, которая улучшает производительность и плавность в играх. fsr, это, упрощенно говоря, способ увеличить fps за счет того, что игра рендерится в низком разрешении, а потом картинка улучшает качество с помощью алгоритмов. режим performance рендерит игру в очень низком разрешении, примерно 25% от финального, чтобы максимально повысить fps. это хорошо, если тебе важна скорость, а не идеальное качество картинки. fg, или frame generation, это генерация дополнительных кадров между уже рендеренными кадрами, чтобы еще больше увеличить плавность в игре. fg использует алгоритмы, чтобы предсказывать и создавать дополнительные кадры, то есть тебе кажется, что игра работает быстрее, чем на самом деле. fsr 3.1 performance + fg, это комбинация этих двух технологий: сначала увеличивается fps за счет низкого рендера, а потом добавляются новые кадры для еще большей плавности, но из-за этого качество картинки может быть хуже, чем в стандартных режимах...
Fairly, I don't really care about graphics absoluetly. It still playable on 30 FPS, and that's enough)
"But Can It Run Dtalker 2?"
Bro is it my screen , or this is captured with screen tearing ?
pls make gtx 1660 6gb video
++++
Super 😊
It's not gonna run my dude, sorry.
@@TheRedRaven_ its literally the listed minimum requirement
@@TheRedRaven_ you sure?
@@Psychol-sg7ss Oh yeah, I watched a bunch of Stalker GPU tests today and one was a 1660ti, it was at 20fps with everything low with dips into 8 fps like crazy. Even my 4060 struggles a bit from what I see, I would have to play at 1080p high for a stable 60fps with DLSS on. The game needs patches though, it has issues.
1650 super, or no super?
Muy buen trabajo, por favor muestra como se ve con una 3070
20Gb ram???
Madness
LOOKS BETTER EVEN IN LOW RESOLUTION ON GTX1650(MY OLDER PC HAS GTX1650 I5 9400F 16GB 2666MHZ)AND MY NEWER RTX3060 I5 12400F 16GB 3200MHZ SO WILL TRY IT ON BOTH PC(JUST USE A EXTERNAL SSD SO I DONT NEED TO DOWNLOAD IT 2 TIMES THOUGH)
If people reallt think gtx 1650 would handle this mess of a game is crazy .
rtx 3050 video needed
can you do rx 6600
Yes
For 2h
hi. On 1650 16gb and amd ryzen 4600h the game can give good fps. but the problem is in optimization, some shadows that load the system and plus an unknown leak. I was able to play at 60-70 fps on low quality balance, well at least 50 if they optimized... but because of the leak the fps drops to 8-25 fps. I had to reboot and everything is fine again, but after a while this shitty leak again. I will wait a month and see in the end how the developer will do anything at all
GTX 1660 pls 😭🙏
we need test on 3060 12gb !
Disappointing as I said. Not everyone can afford cool graphics cards as usual. My 1650 won't pull it off based on benchmarks. Shame. The game looks cool on ultra settings. I'm bummed.
Joking aside... it's time to upgrade the GPU, the 1650 has always been a crappy GPU compared to others.
How about gtx 1080? 😅
Just started...it runs surprisingly good, i will never stop being amazed what can 7 years old GPU do
So with an 1080ti it should be possible to get at least some FPS to play the game smoothly? 🥹
@@manuelwolfsberger2345 I think if the gtx 1080 can do it, then why can't the 1080 ti?
@@manuelwolfsberger2345 Yes, its a mix of mid/high setting, FSR3 on and i can play around 80 fps while exploring, there are some stutters and drops in crowded areas but it's playable
EDIT: Im sorry i thought it was about 1080Ti from start, my bad, my experience is on 1080Ti, sorry
@OVSANKA-PROJECT i was Just wondering if its a 20 - 30 FPS "playable or a somehow good playable thing ^^
1660 super please
i can run rdr2 on medium/high setting with 60+ fps on my LAPTOP, this game is an absolute mess...
На 1070 обычной как идет , знает кто?
i guess cyberpunk was just a warning to people thinking day 1 released games will be optimized
Bro, those graphics are from the last generation, and it runs that badly...
game is so fucking buggy and horribly optimized it's insane lol, even when it says it's running at a decent fps it still feels slow af, and btw why is it using more than 16gb ram when they recommended it for at least minimum? this lowkey gotta be the worst optimized game of this generation
Turn of frame generation. Also if there is more ram the game is going to use more ram it's a good thing that the game uses more ram than just letting your extra ram go to waste 😂
@qlintenFX i never saw any game of this generation using damn near 20gb of ram but ok, and it was still running like shit nonetheless so there's that lol
@mauriciohiure2192 check it one more time, the game is using under 10gb of ram, under ram u will see how much the game is using.
@@edwardbenchmarks guess i got bamboozled by the UI then, my bad
@@mauriciohiure2192 No worries man
Metro is better
RTX 2060 pls
th-cam.com/video/vZdXCvgpDnk/w-d-xo.html
oh my pc.....
6700xt pls bro
крч на пекарне играть можно, ура
Guys, it s normally in first day realeses
Nah gtx 1650 is cooked gtx1060 and rx580 is minimum for 1080p low 30 fps gtx 1650 is not that better than 1060 and 580
GTX 1060 and RX 580 is approximately %30 faster than GTX 1650, so at least GTX 1650 can see 20 FPS. According to minimum requirements which they say 1080p low 30 FPS but VRAM is main issue looks like. What a poor optimization.
@@muhammedebrarnazli_1968 yea true thank god i upgraded from 1060
GTX 1060 and RX 580 is approximately %30 faster than GTX 1650, so at least GTX 1650 can see 20 FPS at least and 24 as average. According to minimum requirements which they say 1080p low 30 FPS but VRAM is main issue looks like. What a poor optimization.
Rx 6600 plzzz
32gb ram 💀
?
Piece of bug
Another unoptimise 🗑️🗑️
4GB VRAM is a problem, wait for the next video
dude it's a 1650 lmaoo
Woah this is bad lol
It's now the official death of little beast 1650🥲
No it's the death of optimization
Embarrassing performance.
так плохо могли сделать только украинцы
ну или поляки со своим киберпуком
@rovensky9784 киберпанк даже на релизе выглядел прилично, а тут какой-то мод
🤮🤮🤮🤮