'Did You Agree With It?': Ted Cruz Grills Judicial Nominee About Controversial Press Release

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 546

  • @freshurb8963
    @freshurb8963 3 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    ANYONE who refuses to answer a DIRECT question when going through Nomination hearings should be immediate removed from consideration

    • @tommas2674
      @tommas2674 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      absolutely . and also wray excuse " can't answer on a on going investigation " means we don't do anything about dem/left/nazi/marxist Crimes the real crimes.

    • @stovepipe1015
      @stovepipe1015 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They're all communists, they wouldn't have been a brandon pick if they weren't.

    • @helenzass1757
      @helenzass1757 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This is the politicians learning video on how NOT to answer a question.

  • @fishingnorcal2956
    @fishingnorcal2956 3 ปีที่แล้ว +196

    Not 1 democrat nominee can answer a single question. DENY EVERY ONE !

    • @Reaper-cm4jr
      @Reaper-cm4jr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It's amazing that every one of these Liberal Nominees starts out every answer with "Thank You For That Question". Why is that? Coaching perhaps?
      "Let's Go Brandon"

    • @SolutionsNotPrayers
      @SolutionsNotPrayers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cruz misrepresents the questions, he purposefully edits information so the replies will go his way. It's a known tactic used by corrupt lawyers. It's their job to interpret and they ask questions that limit the full truth.

    • @fishingnorcal2956
      @fishingnorcal2956 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Brandon Hitler what replies? Lol you mean the paragraphs that had nothing to do with the YES OR NO question. Cruz could not have asked the questions in a more simple way even a 2nd grader can understand a yes or no question. Lol please explain how Cruz worded a yes or no question to get a yes or no answer only to get a paragraph that has nothing to do with the question? I'll wait. 🥱

    • @fishingnorcal2956
      @fishingnorcal2956 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Rodogg 1978 I already knew that lol. Was calling his bluff

    • @AshiStarshade
      @AshiStarshade 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What are you talking about, did you even watch the video? The first and third answered the question.

  • @lightgiver7311
    @lightgiver7311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    Famous words from the Left - "I don't recall"

    • @kazamamuramasa8201
      @kazamamuramasa8201 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "I can't confirm nor recall that comment. It would be imprudent of me to make a comment at this time"
      I think it was Reagan but I could be wrong.

    • @rubytuesday7653
      @rubytuesday7653 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Both parties! Are guilty!

    • @rubytuesday7653
      @rubytuesday7653 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Rodogg 1978 Nope, dumb minded thinking!

    • @rubytuesday7653
      @rubytuesday7653 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Rodogg 1978 dang sure did!!! Stupid actor...wife had the big nuts...lol

    • @rubytuesday7653
      @rubytuesday7653 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Rodogg 1978 Now ...let me have it! Call me names ...6 years old.

  • @ladyecho7761
    @ladyecho7761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +161

    I'm guessing a yes or no answer must be physical pain for these judges.

    • @JerseyGurl4Life
      @JerseyGurl4Life 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      😄😃😀 I totally agree.🙅🏾‍♀️

    • @dr.zippymcscoots8725
      @dr.zippymcscoots8725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well a yes or no answer may not explain all the facts right? Let me guess you think all Republics are honorable and havent done a fuckin thing wrong...

    • @ladyecho7761
      @ladyecho7761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@dr.zippymcscoots8725 Are you upset, blossom?

    • @brookbandeen4999
      @brookbandeen4999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dr.zippymcscoots8725
      Wow
      Having a bad day?

    • @sean9448
      @sean9448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It says in the bible that anything but yes or no comes from evil.

  • @ExiledByForce1
    @ExiledByForce1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    There's nothing more untrustworthy then an individual that refuses to answer a question.

    • @jeanetterichardson7450
      @jeanetterichardson7450 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      EXACTLY!

    • @stovepipe1015
      @stovepipe1015 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Especially directly after they say "Thank you for the question". They're all communists, they wouldn't be a brandon pick if they weren't.

    • @helenzass1757
      @helenzass1757 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is the politicians learning video on how NOT to answer a question.

  • @rhakes23
    @rhakes23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    Liars, every one of Biden's picks!

    • @dr.zippymcscoots8725
      @dr.zippymcscoots8725 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trump lied all the time................ Weird you would say that being I assume your an adult with integrity that knows and respects right and wrong. Unless of course your not...

  • @johnathansmith8297
    @johnathansmith8297 3 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    These evasive answers are disqualifying. Period.

    • @o.yamaguchi2023
      @o.yamaguchi2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Captain Gregg just a heads up. Fascism was literally (yes, the actual definition of literally) created to stop the spread of communism. Most people's education into what "fascism" is, is from Marxist education.

    • @finlandjourney6065
      @finlandjourney6065 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@o.yamaguchi2023 Fascism is a complicated subject. I prefer to look at it from an economic angle comparing Capitalism vs Communism vs Fascism. In capitalism the corporations carry both risks and rewards, while for communism the citizens carry the risks and rewards, but in fascism the corporations get all the rewards while the citizens get to carry all the risks (and costs). When US had the 2008 bailouts they were literally practising fascism for having the citizen tax payers to pay for the losses of the banks! In Mussolini's words, and I'm paraphrasing "Fascism should be called corporatism", and that is when the corporations and government sleep in same bed and the citizens are getting fucked in the ass! You can't deny it, for Mussolini was infamous for being a giant fascist jerk!

    • @o.yamaguchi2023
      @o.yamaguchi2023 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@finlandjourney6065 ohh, totally. But my point is that national socialism is often correlated and confused with fascism, but it was not fascism it was national socialism (which had little do with the standard definition of Socialism).

  • @klars3207
    @klars3207 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Who decided these are honorable people?

    • @JimmeShelter
      @JimmeShelter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Biduh and Camel-O

    • @finlandjourney6065
      @finlandjourney6065 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe the "hon." means a honey. I would call her a viper though.

    • @stovepipe1015
      @stovepipe1015 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The communists did.

  • @MrBoazhorribilis
    @MrBoazhorribilis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    "Thank you for that question, Senator, now let me prevaricate ad nauseam till I find the back door escape" --- our next judges.

    • @blizzardfan777
      @blizzardfan777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I shouldn’t have laughed as hard as I did with this! The level of ignorance with many of these nominees has me stressed out, so it’s nice to get occasional comic relief.

    • @spz598
      @spz598 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blizzardfan777
      Comic relief is our only hope to ride out the madness. This internal destruction of OUR constitutional Republic.
      We gotta laugh at these sociopathic anti America ideologues. Laughter is sanity.
      DELIBERATE "ignorance"
      Bunch of lying communists.
      Just like Vanita Gupta.
      Awful.
      I'm gonna look it up..but does anyone know if they all got confirmed?
      Let's see how many criminals they've allowed on the streets.
      How many of them have and are still ignoring mandatory minimums and rules of law.
      And ignore the first amendment and civil rights of defendants depending on defendant political affiliations and race.

  • @Commendato66
    @Commendato66 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    Let‘s Go Brandon

  • @hekili-machine3933
    @hekili-machine3933 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    They all lie without hesitation. They all know there are no repercussions.

    • @stovepipe1015
      @stovepipe1015 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They're all communists.

    • @helenzass1757
      @helenzass1757 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is the politicians learning video on how NOT to answer a question.

  • @tombown9960
    @tombown9960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Hate when these so called well educated people say they can’t speak to this or that.

    • @rotabo001
      @rotabo001 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Captain Gregg yes...i want you to keep thinking like that!

  • @hmichaelhawkins8532
    @hmichaelhawkins8532 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    If I were a Senator on this committee, I would insist I NOT be thanked for any question I asked. It's a delaying tactic and I don't care whether or not you are thankful for the question.

    • @carlsagan2299
      @carlsagan2299 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's probably a time killing tactic.

    • @JohnSmith-ei6sc
      @JohnSmith-ei6sc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Carl Sagan it is. Lol they use all these words and mumbo jumbo to eat up time on their response.

    • @dogzilla210lbs3
      @dogzilla210lbs3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1 minute out of 5, wasted. Wasted, kinda like Joe ! Of course I meant coffee !

    • @DatHombre
      @DatHombre 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Seriously that's all I can think of when I watch all of these videos. There should be a universal rule that you cannot thank anyone for their question/that everyone's "thankfulness" is implied and does not need to ever be stated. Whenever I hear it now, it just indicates to me that they are simply trying to take up as much time as possible. Becomes very transparent after hearing it 900 times.

    • @finlandjourney6065
      @finlandjourney6065 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thankfulness Lives Not Matter!

  • @riverspirit7
    @riverspirit7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    They must have lowered the BAR standard over the last 30 years, huh?

    • @nahbruv3621
      @nahbruv3621 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      bar is removed
      if they can slide under a door they get the job

  • @mikerobertson4041
    @mikerobertson4041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Now, why don't I believe one word that any of these people are saying!

    • @rubytuesday7653
      @rubytuesday7653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Amazing how many people believe Mr Rat....do research.

  • @Vmaxfodder
    @Vmaxfodder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    If she can't recall, Ted's given her schooling and took her to the woodshed!

    • @dr.zippymcscoots8725
      @dr.zippymcscoots8725 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ted Cruz, the lying insurrectionist? We are talking about that Ted Cruz and not some other guy who might have actual honor and integrity?

    • @Hatemakesyoustupid
      @Hatemakesyoustupid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What is wrong with you people, has a law ever been wrong, has a law ever been overturned, yes and yes, judges do it all the time especially judges that Cruz endorses thats why we have SCOTUS and damn sometimes they get it wrong.

    • @Vmaxfodder
      @Vmaxfodder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Hatemakesyoustupid you seem triggered, and woke. Just because you're offended, and butthurt does not make you right.

    • @AustriaGermany
      @AustriaGermany 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dr.zippymcscoots8725 you're funny - liberals are losing and will lose more

    • @lisawhite3380
      @lisawhite3380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      She can't recall.. Liar.

  • @c0nc3ntr8d6
    @c0nc3ntr8d6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    It’s almost like their entire past should be forgotten prior to becoming a judge.....

  • @leemnav
    @leemnav 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    "I can't recall"
    Cruz : " OK , next question"

  • @2006ManPro
    @2006ManPro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Why always "thank you for that question", when they certainly don' feel that way?

  • @tomtransport
    @tomtransport 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Ted should have asked....."If I was in your court and you asked me a question, If I hedged and spun but did not answer the question, as you are doing here, after I asked it clearly many times, would you hold me in contempt of court???!!? Remember you are under oath"!!

  • @hi-q2261
    @hi-q2261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Can someone please explain to me why every Democrat nominee looks like a raving activist feminist 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳

    • @princev1bes166
      @princev1bes166 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Feminist? I thought they were She/Hers on hormones 🤔 pretty sure Samantha used to be Elliot

    • @hi-q2261
      @hi-q2261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@princev1bes166 I don't know what homenss means 🙄

    • @fishingnorcal2956
      @fishingnorcal2956 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Because they all are

    • @Dang3rMouSe
      @Dang3rMouSe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lol, true. Probably cause they all subscribe either to the ideas of 3rd wave "men & masculinity are the primary source of evil in our world" feminism or other equally radical far-leftist doctrines. Our country has never before seen so many radical political extremists nominated by a US President.
      Marxism & Fabian socialism are the core primary principles that connect all these radical ideologies which so often disguise themselves as "rights groups." They all base their doctrine within the same framework of communism's "bourgeoisie" and "proletariat" class struggle. They realized that due to Americans' success & prosperity, for communism/socialism to actually take hold they'd need to replace the primary classes involved & focus propaganda/organization within college campuses & minority communities. The main push occurred around the 1960s & had incredible success on college campuses.
      They replaced "bourgeoisie" w/ "American, Western democracies, capitalism, white ppl/whiteness, liberty, conservative, Christianity, masculinity, etc..." Then they replaced "proletariat" w/ "minorities, females, Islam, LGBTQ+" & as many other 'identities' they could who might perceive themselves as oppressed & be manipulated (they have only had some success w/ Islam, thank God.) They fed these groups the same Marxist ideological propaganda & BAM, here we are slightly over half a century later.
      Nearly all of the Democrat Party, news/media/tech corporations, govt entities & even our military have been overrun by political ideological extremists. What we are currently witnessing in the US is what they refer to as a Fabian Socialist coup or revolution. If it is not snuffed out & eradicated (primarily through hard facts & common sense to deprogram their cult like beliefs), I give the US under a single decade before we lose nearly all inherent rights & freedoms & our country is no longer recognizable as a beacon of liberty around the world🗽.

    • @Cascada200
      @Cascada200 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Box checkers, that’s the goal. They disregard anyone who should actually be qualified for the job. And as a result, this is the mess we have as an administration. Box checkers for the sanctimonious bunch of idiots.

  • @theasmrlibrarian6598
    @theasmrlibrarian6598 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Why is every single nominee a former advocate??

  • @tombown9960
    @tombown9960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Like getting blood out of a stone or pulling hens teeth.

    • @helenzass1757
      @helenzass1757 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is the politicians learning video on how NOT to answer a question.

  • @yogashima3
    @yogashima3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    We live in world, where they are lying, we know they are lying, they know that we know they are lying. But they know they can get away with it. How sick of a world we live in.

  • @jafofubar3793
    @jafofubar3793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    give em all Sodium Pentothal then the American people just might hear the REAL Truth

    • @jafofubar3793
      @jafofubar3793 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Captain Gregg Biden's case it would be Ice Cream

    • @jafofubar3793
      @jafofubar3793 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Captain Gregg because it all Captivates the Mind and Inquiring Minds want to Know

  • @mikebartek3600
    @mikebartek3600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Why do they have honorable before their name when that is the last thing they are.

  • @M49-x9k
    @M49-x9k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is BS they never answer a. question.

  • @JDPri77
    @JDPri77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Sorry Ms Ohta, If you can't answer a question, how do you expect witnesses to answer questions that come before you? Rather than evading, answer it. It is far less damaging than your constant evasions. But in the end, Ohta is definitely not qualified for this reason: judicial activism and legislation is prevalent in the country due to 8 years of Obama. Each one of his nominees said the exact same thing, that they would judge according to precedence regardless of their leftest affiliations. Do we really need anymore? I understand an occasional mis-speak as Ms Elliot explained. I would have hoped that Ms. Menendez would have simply said Constitution, precedent, and legislative statutes that are constitutional. But her answer was better than the other two.

  • @wjlintz
    @wjlintz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    In a nutshell, "Nothing we've ever said or done has anything to do with who we are."

  • @kaycoats8344
    @kaycoats8344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    How is they are all well versed in evading answering simple questions? And disregarding truth!! We want an honest Judge!

  • @mrsl5514
    @mrsl5514 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That "thank you for that question Senator" in a fake positive tone is SO irritating. What is the point of these hearings if every single one of these evil people are caught in lies but yet get nominated? It's a complete waste of time.

  • @MrBoazhorribilis
    @MrBoazhorribilis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    How interesting that the preponderance of these candidates sent by this admin for confirmation are embarrassed by and disown systematically much of their preceding work and statements and promised insistently that once they get the bone, they will chew it in full accordance with the accepted rules of bone chewing as described in our laws. I do not trust any of them.

    • @satanshelperog5511
      @satanshelperog5511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because they are all activist's being put up by this fraudulent administration 🤡 Past statements and actions prove it.

  • @burnedagain6187
    @burnedagain6187 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    No offense but why all women are nominated now? Seems to be a imbalance

    • @jeromehempe4311
      @jeromehempe4311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Feminist radicals...not women

    • @bob733333
      @bob733333 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A lot of women are afraid of guns. Etc.

  • @miawarren8735
    @miawarren8735 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    She’s lying. Do not confirm

  • @Chrisfragger1
    @Chrisfragger1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It's very concerning if a JUDGE has trouble speaking their minds and being clear with what they are saying...

  • @pml2979
    @pml2979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    What these Judicial nominees are doing is taking the 5th Amendment on questions without saying I take the 5th Amendment.

  • @deebee9917
    @deebee9917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    what we are seeing here is affirmative action with women being appointed to these seats.

    • @puffthemagicdragon9534
      @puffthemagicdragon9534 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Equity is the new left term for everything.

    • @hscottg
      @hscottg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wish they were real women. Real women are caring and compassionate. These women seem like mindless robots reading their answer from their cheat sheet. I haven't problem with women in office. My favorite people are women with exception of a few guys. Let's get real people in office.

  • @dfuss2756
    @dfuss2756 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    When you say you don't recall, A recall on you should be made.

  • @memom010605
    @memom010605 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd have to say Nooooo to them all

  • @doritamacdonald9983
    @doritamacdonald9983 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    These nominees have memory problems and avoid answering directly.

    • @Khultan
      @Khultan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Each and everyone of them.

  • @dixiesdad1841
    @dixiesdad1841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Lopez: "Thank you for the question Senator, and I cannot remember any case that makes me look like a fool and a liar".

  • @Vanfran2
    @Vanfran2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    She just gave herself away.
    She said she would follow the president faithfully

    • @carolmaule8449
      @carolmaule8449 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I cought that also. Scary enough !

  • @dfhalonen190
    @dfhalonen190 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    She finally did admit she agreed with it after painful pry bar ala Senator Cruz and in terms she can easily deny due to ambiguities in everything she utters.

  • @terike9738
    @terike9738 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "I take the First Amendment very seriously". Good lord, you incompetent snake, you are supposed to apply the law and tge Cinstitution, nor tell us you take it seriously.

  • @kimberlyhoffman1828
    @kimberlyhoffman1828 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks again Mr Cruz so glad ur on top of all this, hold them to the Truth 🙂🙋‍♀️

  • @miawarren8735
    @miawarren8735 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They all get a big fat No

  • @joemacinnis1972
    @joemacinnis1972 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Not 1 Republican should vote for any of these radical nutjobs! Just say no. Let's go Brandon

  • @TheJedikai
    @TheJedikai 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Imagine if we acted in such ridiculous ways in an interview. We'd be disqualified immediately. These so called judges are scary.

  • @Sannidor
    @Sannidor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    5:00 holy smokes, just look how long does it take for them to just say *YES* or *NO*
    It's like catching eels with bare hands. She's equally slimy.

  • @IAMSatisfied
    @IAMSatisfied 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The response to that last question to Judge Ohta was disturbing, to say the least. They should have a giant gong (Like on The Gong Show) to disqualify those who do anything but answer any question directly.

  • @robertdouglas8895
    @robertdouglas8895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    In other words, figuring out personalities and how to manipulate them is a better skill than applying the law to cases.
    I will faithfully apply the law as I have always done because I never make mistakes and even if I do, I don't remember them.
    The past is just a dream and has no bearing on my life which only started when I became a sitting judge.

  • @BedsitBob
    @BedsitBob 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As a Judge, you'ld think she would understand the difference between "Do You?" and "Did You?"

  • @darkgelfling
    @darkgelfling 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can people stop thanking. Hun for the questions and just answer them.

  • @toensingjeanette7459
    @toensingjeanette7459 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This one a big No! Can't answer the questions!

  • @goinxnginx
    @goinxnginx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is it obligatory to say "Thank you for that question, Senator"?

    • @Chrisfragger1
      @Chrisfragger1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, that gets annoying as hell too... It eats up time, you KNOW they don't actually like these questions...

  • @HEMPPASTE
    @HEMPPASTE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GO TED! America is behind you!

  • @explodingrubberducky797
    @explodingrubberducky797 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Crooked people never give a straight answer

  • @jorgemartinez452
    @jorgemartinez452 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I will uphold if nominated
    I don’t recall
    Forget my past just nominate me
    NOT

  • @JamesJones-oz8hi
    @JamesJones-oz8hi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All these 2 faced

  • @notkristinj
    @notkristinj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let’s go Brandon 👏👏👏👏👏

  • @jeffreystinger
    @jeffreystinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU SENATOR TED CRUZ!!!! WISH WE HAD A SENATOR LIKE YOU SIR, IN MONTANA!!👏🏻♥️🇺🇸

  • @joshhadley9445
    @joshhadley9445 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm so sick of nominees from dems lying their faces off & there being no consequences.

  • @smokeykick
    @smokeykick 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Senator Cruz!🙏🏼🇺🇸👍🏼

  • @lanettewilliams1716
    @lanettewilliams1716 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Get this judge out of our House asap

  • @bobstine1874
    @bobstine1874 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks you Sen.Cruz

  • @labsub
    @labsub 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What's with all these women, trying to run things outside of the home?

  • @ItsCarlnotCarla
    @ItsCarlnotCarla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Last Judge lied through her teeth

  • @michaelangelo9119
    @michaelangelo9119 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    She was smart enough to say "it's not what I intended to say"

  • @donnaanndefelice-junk9528
    @donnaanndefelice-junk9528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vote NO! “Thank you for the question…”

  • @jeffstevens156
    @jeffstevens156 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    TEAR THE, UP TED!

  • @davidfitzgerald3653
    @davidfitzgerald3653 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This psychopath is going to be a judge. Hope I dont get in trouble. Wow. Just wow. I wouldnt let this woman work as a bagger in a grocery store. She is clueless

  • @wendykaluzue3774
    @wendykaluzue3774 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not answering is an answer

  • @foodmotivated837
    @foodmotivated837 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When they than you for the question.... they don't answer the question

  • @TheRebelcat65
    @TheRebelcat65 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jesus, Mary, and Joseph...A decent person should three times recheck the witnesses' "Thank you, Mr. Senator"...Because, there's no one who can tell you for sure is it the fact, or not!?! This is where we are and this is how serious this is!!!

  • @christopherklaus2072
    @christopherklaus2072 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    O my god Elliot actually answered the question she was asked, that is the only nominee i have seen so far who has given a sensible answer and shown some humility while answering and seemed very sincere.

  • @godsownson2469
    @godsownson2469 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    They are all say " Thank you for the question " and then go on not to answer the question🤷

  • @Scott-lg8im
    @Scott-lg8im 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Most have previous advocacy conflicts with being Judges. Either they are different people now or they are accomplished liars.

  • @gambu4810
    @gambu4810 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    They're incompetent.

  • @samerassaf1144
    @samerassaf1144 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That ohta should be denied

  • @OniGundamSeed
    @OniGundamSeed 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me 1st time. This is a yes or no question
    Me everytime after that. YOU HAD ONE JOB!!!

  • @savemejesusiamasinner6463
    @savemejesusiamasinner6463 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Funny how they all have the same rehearsed answer

  • @TheReddkatt
    @TheReddkatt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what a frightening array of muppets these nominees are......scary stuff

  • @artcook1976
    @artcook1976 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We love you Cruz keep battelling

  • @lanettewilliams1716
    @lanettewilliams1716 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We love ❤️ u T.C. May god in heaven continue to give u the power to keep making America 🇺🇸 people what is needed .

  • @ttestates1
    @ttestates1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Last thing I'll say is, Thank God for the
    US Supreme Court!

  • @markgill728
    @markgill728 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    When anyone refuses to answer, it speaks volumes to the character of said person.

  • @allanlansdowne340
    @allanlansdowne340 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think Judge Judy would be better.

  • @jimskee44
    @jimskee44 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    "That's not what I intended to say" But you said it...These people are disgusting!!

  • @jefftappan3091
    @jefftappan3091 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do these candidates " thank him for the question " and mean it? Sounds very disingenuous to me.

  • @jeffreybrown6597
    @jeffreybrown6597 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Get her, Cruz!

  • @tommcqueen3145
    @tommcqueen3145 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That a shame

  • @guidedmeditation2396
    @guidedmeditation2396 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How many times has this woman visited mainland China in the last ten years?
    I hear its nice.

  • @jophoenix3919
    @jophoenix3919 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You did not suggest You said!!

  • @asamarduk2597
    @asamarduk2597 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes you did

  • @kwisatzhaderach1458
    @kwisatzhaderach1458 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How a lady gonna have a Korean first name with a Japanese last name...There's your problem right there. Not to be trusted.

  • @hebber1961
    @hebber1961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hearing a lot of "I was wrong then, but trust me now".

  • @frankfranco7251
    @frankfranco7251 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vote for non of those people.

  • @1986prs
    @1986prs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    She’s ridiculous.. Thumbs down to this hack woman. 👎🏽👎🏽

  • @JimmeShelter
    @JimmeShelter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    They should also be grilling all of these people about FISA Court abuses.

  • @jackbailey7037
    @jackbailey7037 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The hypocracy, the idiocy flows and flows