Tspsc మేము Constutional Body, మేము Constutional Body మాకు power ఉంద్ది, మాకు అథారిటీ ఉంద్ది మేము ఎప్పుడైనా, ఎక్కడైనా changes చేస్తాం అనే tspsc సిగ్గులేకుండా వికెపీడియా నీ ఎలా fellow అవుతరు. దిమాక్ వుండే ఇట్లా వ్యవహారిస్తున్నారా లేక కావాలి స్టూడెంట్స్ తో ఆదుకోవాలి అని హ
I heard that TGPSC has also used Wikipedia as an authorized source, and they even phoned one of the authors of a book. Believe me, Wikipedia is NOT an AUTHORISED source; everyone knows that it can be edited by anyone! Please inform the petitioner’s lawyer about this. Making a phone call to an author is not considered authorized unless it is well documented by a reputable publisher. In PREVIOUS Group-1/other cases, I believe they considered the TELUGU ACADEMY as an authorized source; why not now? We should communicate this to the petitioner’s lawyer. TGPSC is playing delay tactics! They must know that translations are required in court cases; they are doing this intentionally.
@@healthtipsandtopfacts7282 Bro, I’m currently far far away from Hyd. I will definitely be part of the team if you or others want to file a case even in sc.
@@raviaapkait's too late now. Even if we file s case. Dasara holidays are there. Tgpsc strategically played game by not filing counter affidavits all these days and now exam date is near
Wikipedia is authentic. They do have algorithms to validate and authenticate edited information by publc contribution. Morever subject expert can decide what content to be taken based on his experience and expertise .
Who says it's authentic? By the way, I come from a publishing background. If you write a book and reference Wikipedia, editors of books and journals will reject it! If you edit wikipedia page and take a printout to submit to the court, who will verify what you’ve written and where it came from? The court doesn't asks for algorithms to verify information. We need to apply some common sense here."
Citing reference for a book is different. Subject expert knows better than anybody. Even judges don't involve in this. Subject experts checks twice before framing a question. Let us see what happens.
@@Spjspj-s6e I think you need to update your knowledge on what is authentic and what is not. Please Google and enhance your understanding. In previous Group-1 cases, questions were framed by subject experts, and the court ordered the removal of over 10+ questions which were incorrect. Please do your research before commenting here.
@@raviaapka completely agree with you! But this is all Govt-court game bro!! TGPSC proved itself incompetent by considering other sources despite itself having its own!!! A very shallow commission!!! This is all going a foolish way! The after-effects though might not be felt now, they will surely be seen in the near future.
Tspsc మేము Constutional Body, మేము Constutional Body మాకు power ఉంద్ది, మాకు అథారిటీ ఉంద్ది మేము ఎప్పుడైనా, ఎక్కడైనా changes చేస్తాం అనే tspsc సిగ్గులేకుండా వికెపీడియా నీ ఎలా fellow అవుతరు.
దిమాక్ వుండే ఇట్లా వ్యవహారిస్తున్నారా లేక కావాలి స్టూడెంట్స్ తో ఆదుకోవాలి అని హ
Are there any chances for the postponement of exam ? The exam time is fast approaching, please let us know whether the exam will be postponed or not !
Thanks for updating! But it will again postpone to other dates..
I heard that TGPSC has also used Wikipedia as an authorized source, and they even phoned one of the authors of a book.
Believe me, Wikipedia is NOT an AUTHORISED source; everyone knows that it can be edited by anyone! Please inform the petitioner’s lawyer about this. Making a phone call to an author is not considered authorized unless it is well documented by a reputable publisher. In PREVIOUS Group-1/other cases, I believe they considered the TELUGU ACADEMY as an authorized source; why not now? We should communicate this to the petitioner’s lawyer.
TGPSC is playing delay tactics! They must know that translations are required in court cases; they are doing this intentionally.
Bro, everyone says but no one's comes to court and file case. What's the use of ranting about it here 🫠
Ela ithe kadu supreme court lo case padali
@@healthtipsandtopfacts7282 Bro, I’m currently far far away from Hyd. I will definitely be part of the team if you or others want to file a case even in sc.
@@raviaapkait's too late now. Even if we file s case. Dasara holidays are there. Tgpsc strategically played game by not filing counter affidavits all these days and now exam date is near
What about sudhir sir case sir
Court ichhe thirpu pattinchukodu revanth
😂
Enni sarlu postpone chesthadu bro.. Waste fellow😢
Wikipedia is authentic.
They do have algorithms to validate and authenticate edited information by publc contribution.
Morever subject expert can decide what content to be taken based on his experience and expertise .
Who says it's authentic? By the way, I come from a publishing background. If you write a book and reference Wikipedia, editors of books and journals will reject it! If you edit wikipedia page and take a printout to submit to the court, who will verify what you’ve written and where it came from? The court doesn't asks for algorithms to verify information. We need to apply some common sense here."
Citing reference for a book is different.
Subject expert knows better than anybody. Even judges don't involve in this.
Subject experts checks twice before framing a question.
Let us see what happens.
@@Spjspj-s6e I think you need to update your knowledge on what is authentic and what is not. Please Google and enhance your understanding. In previous Group-1 cases, questions were framed by subject experts, and the court ordered the removal of over 10+ questions which were incorrect.
Please do your research before commenting here.
@@raviaapka you will come to know who has to update knowledge.just wait for few days
@@raviaapka completely agree with you! But this is all Govt-court game bro!! TGPSC proved itself incompetent by considering other sources despite itself having its own!!! A very shallow commission!!! This is all going a foolish way! The after-effects though might not be felt now, they will surely be seen in the near future.