@@kamelalhassani4609 but so many people enjoy discovering unknown things...you don't have to know something fully to make a discovery or learn a truth...all of the apostles were thinking like "I don't get this Jesus dude but I am going to keep on learning from Him and following Him and asking Him questions because I find this interesting and I am curious. I don't know where this is going or what it might mean, but I'm in."
As someone who is trying to find faith after 50+ years of drift, I find Paula's teaching to be extremely helpful and informative. She has certainly given me the appetite to search for more of her work. One small criticism of style if I may: why not use the pronoun "it" rather than relentlessly saying Mark's Gospel, sometimes 3 times in the same sentence!?
Paula Gooder is a gifted teacher. Her exposition of the date of composition of Mark's Gospel is valuable; also her description of how the eyewitness testimony in Mark is the eyewitness testimony of Peter. Mark served as an aid and interpreter for Peter for several years before Peter was executed by the Romans after the Fire of Rome in 64 AD. For more on this check out Dr. Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses. Also my historical novel, Mark's Passion, may be helpful. It is the story of Mark the Evangelist and how he put the Gospel in writing. Gene Vanderzanden, author of Mark's Passion.
It's a big a lie to say that mark was writing from a eyewitness. You can read the gospel and see the mulpile errors of geography and information about the time of jesus. Without citing the shameful contradictions found in this gospel.
Dr Victor Pearce in his book 'Evidence for truth - archaeology' notes that as a tax collector Matthew would have carried his note-book around with him. He could have written down rough notes on the same day Jesus spoke. And that would mean that it is highly likely Matthew's gospel was written first says Pearce. It is however possible that Mark's gospel was in wider circulation because it was possibly written down in Rome.
Of course for the first 1700+ years, the church concluded that Matthew was written first. Why can't Mark be a condensation of Matthew? Oh, and where is 'Q'?
I reject Matthew, Luke, and John as spurious. I only accept Gospel of Mark, as majority of scholars regard it as oldest and authentic. Nowhere did Jesus Christ say "I am God, pray to me", so we Evangelical Christians will not pray to Jesus Christ as its idolatry.
We must remember the attempts to translate Aramaic , Hebrew , and Greek into English from to totally different letter and word meanings which has proven at places almost maverick in meaning and or totally wrong as well . Best of luck to anyone studying in English translation and trying to make sense of it all . Learning these languages does have it's advantages .
She might be new to youtube and looking into cameras. I guess maybe in the future she might learn this skill :) You can still learn things from people even if they are not looking at you. Like u know, blind people can still talk to you and turn in your general direction, but of course they will never look at you or make eye contact...but they are still interesting people and they have a lot of cool ideas to share with you...maybe you could practice your listening skills instead of telling other people what to do and where to look and how to give speeches. :)
It's interesting that this scholar suggests that the Gospel of Mark was written sometime between A.D. 67 and A.D. 73, because if Mark is indeed based on the teachings or recollections of the Apostle Peter, then we have problems with a date of A.D. 73, or even A.D. 67, for Peter's martyrdom is typically dated even earlier, to A.D. 64. Thus, Peter's martyrdom points to a date sometime in the early 60s for the writing of the Gospel of Mark.
+Derek Atkins -- Mark was an aid and interpreter for Peter, who worked at Peter's side for several years before Peter was executed by the Romans after the Fire of Rome in 64 AD. See my historical novel, Mark's Passion, which is the story of Mark, the Evangelist who first put the Gospel in writing. See also Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses.
Corinthians is probably just misunderstood. At most, I think, scripture forbids women to hold official positions of leadership in the church (but even then I could be wrong). I’ve been very interested in this topic and have tried to look into it. Yes it seems very much so women can and do teach in the New Testament. Women of that time period were not educated as much as men, but in our time period they have the same opportunity and are educated the same.
Dennis R Mac Donald in his book "The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark" makes a very good case that Mark was writing fiction. Jesus based on Homer's Odyssey.
i don't know what you mean by fiction I this context. How could the author know what Jesus was doing at any given point? It's constructed ( heavily so), and is very influenced by classical works and especially the old testament. Are you saying the author is trying to deceive? I don't get that impression. It's a truthful description of key events and the meaning of those events. If this is fiction, then there is alot of ( unacknowledged) fiction about. i am not a Christian btw.
Have you read the Bible by itself and compared the 4 gospels to one another, not only with your mind, but with a softer focus to allow your heart to get involved in the story?
Wonderful commentary!
The best video I've seen on Mark until now. Merci beaucoup, dear Paula.
She is telling you that we can't date, she tells we don't know the writer. And you take a risk of following the unknown.
@@kamelalhassani4609 but so many people enjoy discovering unknown things...you don't have to know something fully to make a discovery or learn a truth...all of the apostles were thinking like "I don't get this Jesus dude but I am going to keep on learning from Him and following Him and asking Him questions because I find this interesting and I am curious. I don't know where this is going or what it might mean, but I'm in."
An excellent introduction to the gospel of Mark. The first and most exciting of the gospels
Mark gospel
Thanks for providing all the historical and comedy movies from the best comidians of greek theatre.
I enjoyed her thematic analysis of the three major groups through the Gospel of Mark.
Brilliant - best I think I have listened to, thank you!
Absolutely amazing description
As someone who is trying to find faith after 50+ years of drift, I find Paula's teaching to be extremely helpful and informative. She has certainly given me the appetite to search for more of her work.
One small criticism of style if I may: why not use the pronoun "it" rather than relentlessly saying Mark's Gospel, sometimes 3 times in the same sentence!?
I hope you are finding what you need my friend.
Right...she blew my mind
I think this is how British people talk. They prefer using proper nouns over pronouns.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAGAHAHAHAHAHAH
and the same traditions you cited about John-Mark being the author also state Matthew was the earliest and 1 has even Luke coming before Mark.
Paula Gooder is a gifted teacher. Her exposition of the date of composition of Mark's Gospel is valuable; also her description of how the eyewitness testimony in Mark is the eyewitness testimony of Peter. Mark served as an aid and interpreter for Peter for several years before Peter was executed by the Romans after the Fire of Rome in 64 AD. For more on this check out Dr. Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses. Also my historical novel, Mark's Passion, may be helpful. It is the story of Mark the Evangelist and how he put the Gospel in writing. Gene Vanderzanden, author of Mark's Passion.
It's a big a lie to say that mark was writing from a eyewitness. You can read the gospel and see the mulpile errors of geography and information about the time of jesus. Without citing the shameful contradictions found in this gospel.
Interesting! Hope to get this book
Thank you, this video helped to explain a lot of the questions and calm a lot of the concerns I had about this first book of the New Testament.
"Go tell!" Such irony. Brilliant analysis
Dr Victor Pearce in his book 'Evidence for truth - archaeology' notes that as a tax collector Matthew would have carried his note-book around with him. He could have written down rough notes on the same day Jesus spoke. And that would mean that it is highly likely Matthew's gospel was written first says Pearce. It is however possible that Mark's gospel was in wider circulation because it was possibly written down in Rome.
Of course for the first 1700+ years, the church concluded that Matthew was written first. Why can't Mark be a condensation of Matthew? Oh, and where is 'Q'?
I reject Matthew, Luke, and John as spurious. I only accept Gospel of Mark, as majority of scholars regard it as oldest and authentic. Nowhere did Jesus Christ say "I am God, pray to me", so we Evangelical Christians will not pray to Jesus Christ as its idolatry.
The scribes and the Pharisee 😡
The crowds 😲
The disciples 🙄😑😒
... according to Mark 🤔
I think that the disciples were also happy and sad pretty often besides being confused.
We must remember the attempts to translate Aramaic , Hebrew , and Greek into English from to totally different letter and word meanings which has proven at places almost maverick in meaning and or totally wrong as well . Best of luck to anyone studying in English translation and trying to make sense of it all . Learning these languages does have it's advantages .
It would be much nicer if the speaker's eyes "looked" in the direction of the viewer. It would make the viewing experience very personal Thank you.
get lost
wonder fuller bahhhhh!
Informative video
She might be new to youtube and looking into cameras. I guess maybe in the future she might learn this skill :) You can still learn things from people even if they are not looking at you. Like u know, blind people can still talk to you and turn in your general direction, but of course they will never look at you or make eye contact...but they are still interesting people and they have a lot of cool ideas to share with you...maybe you could practice your listening skills instead of telling other people what to do and where to look and how to give speeches. :)
430 she says it is Matt that is longer, but that's a slip. It's Mark
yeah I liked it :)
It's interesting that this scholar suggests that the Gospel of Mark was written sometime between A.D. 67 and A.D. 73, because if Mark is indeed based on the teachings or recollections of the Apostle Peter, then we have problems with a date of A.D. 73, or even A.D. 67, for Peter's martyrdom is typically dated even earlier, to A.D. 64. Thus, Peter's martyrdom points to a date sometime in the early 60s for the writing of the Gospel of Mark.
+Derek Atkins -- Mark was an aid and interpreter for Peter, who worked at Peter's side for several years before Peter was executed by the Romans after the Fire of Rome in 64 AD. See my historical novel, Mark's Passion, which is the story of Mark, the Evangelist who first put the Gospel in writing. See also Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses.
To me personally...it doesn't matter who wrote Mark. No one will ever know for sure who wrote Mark. And I think that's perfect 👌
Women are not to teach/preach. Is that correct?
I am understanding that women can pray, prophesy, sing.
Corinthians is probably just misunderstood. At most, I think, scripture forbids women to hold official positions of leadership in the church (but even then I could be wrong). I’ve been very interested in this topic and have tried to look into it. Yes it seems very much so women can and do teach in the New Testament. Women of that time period were not educated as much as men, but in our time period they have the same opportunity and are educated the same.
The link requires that I sign in. There's no option for registration either.
Dennis R Mac Donald in his book "The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark" makes a very good case that Mark was writing fiction. Jesus based on Homer's Odyssey.
i don't know what you mean by fiction I this context. How could the author know what Jesus was doing at any given point? It's constructed ( heavily so), and is very influenced by classical works and especially the old testament. Are you saying the author is trying to deceive? I don't get that impression. It's a truthful description of key events and the meaning of those events. If this is fiction, then there is alot of ( unacknowledged) fiction about. i am not a Christian btw.
So you based your opinion only on Dennis R Mac Donald book?
Have you read the Bible by itself and compared the 4 gospels to one another, not only with your mind, but with a softer focus to allow your heart to get involved in the story?
@@lemurlover7975 You are correct, it is only a story after all. I take it you realise that Matthew and luke copy verbatim large chunks of Mark.
I suffer not a woman to teach
Out of context brother. Women can teach.
Not reflected the word is redacted.