Very timely atty. thank you so much po. Studying law becomes more interesting when applied to actual cases like this. Nagiging deeper yong understanding ko po at madaling matatandaan kasi may nakaugnay na ganitong example.
After intently listening to your case analysis Atty JP, I knew right away, I am learning law the wrong way. After I watched the shooting video S couple of times, I've immediately concluded that Art 148 shall apply because of excessive force employed without considering other equally important justifying or exempting circumstances. Very impressive the way you presented your analysis. Thank you so much Sire!
Go ahead sir.. you have my permission.. and thank you for the support, ginawa ko tlga mga videos para kung sakaling napagod na kayo sa kakabasa, pwede manood na lang kayo and makinig..
Merry Christmas Atty! Question lang po sana, kunwari po na nabuhay ang mga biktima. Possible po pa na Frustrated Homicide ang ikakaso at hindi frustrated Murder? Thanks atty!
Sabihin mo n lng na naka survive wag lang resurrection hehe.. pag walang qualifying aggravating circumstance frus homicide siya pero pag may qualifying aggravating frus murder po siya..
attorney tanong ko lang po kung mabigat po bang kasu ang reckless driving at homicide? yan po kasi ang ikakaso sa kapatid dahil yung nakiangkas po saming tricycle na private,nawalan na po syang preno dahil palusong yung kalsada tumalon po kasi yung namatay na ngayon kaya sasampahan ng kaso po kapatid ko, salamat po attorney marami po kayong natutulungan
Atty. I just want to know if on occasion of an epidemic under article 248 par. 4 will also apply in this case aside from those which you have mentioned in the video like treachery, superior strength and evident premeditation as one of the qualifying or attendant circumstances...tnx po...
kelangan po kasi dito, he must have TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF the epidemic. Hindi lang dahil sa nag exist ang epidemic at the time of commission, kelangan ginamit niya iyong pagkakataon na may epidemya kaya c-in-ommit niya ang crime. sa isang case ang sabi ng court ay, "instead of lending aid to the afflicted, he added to their suffering by taking advantage of their misfortune". Kaya naging aggravating siya dahil nagtake advantage ka sa situation. so NOT because of the existence of the epidemic, but because YOU TOOK ADVANTAGE OF the epidemic.
Hello atty., this is not related sa diniscuss nyo po. I just want to ask if (1) lawyers are allowed to have tattoos, (2) is it true na bawal mag work abroad if you had your tattoos done here in the ph?
Very timely atty. thank you so much po. Studying law becomes more interesting when applied to actual cases like this. Nagiging deeper yong understanding ko po at madaling matatandaan kasi may nakaugnay na ganitong example.
Napaka galing NG explanation nyu atty.. Lhat NG video nyu dinownload para aralin,, sana nuon ko pa to nkita nung nag take aq NG prc exam 😊
Ang galing po atty. Salamat mas naiintindihan kona po ng klaro
Atty. Sana meron din yung RPC Art. 1 gang dulo, although mahaba po time kaso ang galing po talaga ng explanation 💕
Hahahahahah CLJ 3 talaga to na subject ba
After intently listening to your case analysis Atty JP, I knew right away, I am learning law the wrong way. After I watched the shooting video S couple of times, I've immediately concluded that Art 148 shall apply because of excessive force employed without considering other equally important justifying or exempting circumstances. Very impressive the way you presented your analysis. Thank you so much Sire!
It's okay sir.. just keep on studying.. that's why we do this para maka pagpractice po tau mag apply ng law..
Tnk u po atty.
Thank you atty galing nyo po dag dag kaalamn nanamn para sa amin gustong mag aral ng abogasya
ma papawow kanalang sa explanation 😍😍😍😍
Thank you Atty. very informative video presentation I'm a criminology student kumbaga advance learning na ito para sa akin😁
Good day atty. Sana po my lecture ka sa procedure at evidence. Kasi subrang dali po intindihin pag ikw nag lecture. Thanks po. Respect!❤
Thank you atty. !
sana po merong video para sa evidence and procedure.
Truly you are the male version of Analise Keating atty
How to get away with murder?
Keep the videos coming Atty! Hulog po kayo ng langit. I love you po. ahahah
Thank you sir.!
Sir I ask permission Kung pwede ko po ba I post sa tiktok itong mga video mo? tapos sabihan ko na rin mga followers ko na mag subscribe dto sayo
Go ahead sir.. you have my permission.. and thank you for the support, ginawa ko tlga mga videos para kung sakaling napagod na kayo sa kakabasa, pwede manood na lang kayo and makinig..
Galing tiktok here thanks mga sir💖
@@egosumpulcher1 salamat po sir
@@jordansakaluran4032 dto ka na dn pala buddy👌👌
@@jhonlesterbuenavista2871 oo buddy hahahaa idol kita eh soon rcrim na tyo buddy👌
thank you po atty
Merry Christmas Atty! Question lang po sana, kunwari po na nabuhay ang mga biktima. Possible po pa na Frustrated Homicide ang ikakaso at hindi frustrated Murder? Thanks atty!
Sabihin mo n lng na naka survive wag lang resurrection hehe.. pag walang qualifying aggravating circumstance frus homicide siya pero pag may qualifying aggravating frus murder po siya..
@@egosumpulcher1 hahaha, Thank you Atty once again
attorney tanong ko lang po kung mabigat po bang kasu ang reckless driving at homicide? yan po kasi ang ikakaso sa kapatid dahil yung nakiangkas po saming tricycle na private,nawalan na po syang preno dahil palusong yung kalsada tumalon po kasi yung namatay na ngayon kaya sasampahan ng kaso po kapatid ko, salamat po attorney marami po kayong natutulungan
Try to settle the case.. sa mga ganyan klase ng kaso usually nakikipagareglo naman ang pamilya ng biktima kc aksidente naman talaga..
So educational as always
Sir tanong cu lang po kung di agad mafile ang murder sa time na nangyari ang crime pwedi pa po ba mag file kahit ilang taon na ang lumipas?
Nasa article 90 po ang sagot
Thank you sir.
Atty. I just want to know if on occasion of an epidemic under article 248 par. 4 will also apply in this case aside from those which you have mentioned in the video like treachery, superior strength and evident premeditation as one of the qualifying or attendant circumstances...tnx po...
kelangan po kasi dito, he must have TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF the epidemic. Hindi lang dahil sa nag exist ang epidemic at the time of commission, kelangan ginamit niya iyong pagkakataon na may epidemya kaya c-in-ommit niya ang crime. sa isang case ang sabi ng court ay, "instead of lending aid to the afflicted, he added to their suffering by taking advantage of their misfortune". Kaya naging aggravating siya dahil nagtake advantage ka sa situation. so NOT because of the existence of the epidemic, but because YOU TOOK ADVANTAGE OF the epidemic.
Thank you! 😊
Thanks for this atty.
The best
Thank you atty. Saan po pwedeng mag message po sainyo Para Lang po sa mga katanungan ko po, thank you atty.. Sana mabasa nyo..
Hello atty., this is not related sa diniscuss nyo po. I just want to ask if (1) lawyers are allowed to have tattoos, (2) is it true na bawal mag work abroad if you had your tattoos done here in the ph?
Thank you Atty. for a concise and organized case analysis. Hope you can share more videos like this!