The best thing about the Internet is that you can learn from many different people. I started this video and then skipped through, and this guy reminded me of when I had to rely completely the on the assigned book. I scrolled to the comments and at the top and I see people commenting about how he is hard to follow, or say he should teach in a certain way. I just want to post and let M.i.T know that if that want bright minds doing research and studying cutting edge subjects that perfectly fine. but how are we the next generation to take over the work if it not being taught right. This video is evidence that a lot of top schools don't have the best teachers they have great student that will go through hell and high water to understand the subject. Please make it easier on your student and hire people who can teach. and keep the people who are just good for research in the lab away from people where they belong. also a pay cut. why give them a check for teaching if they can't teach? give them a check for being a researcher only!
In my opinion, college is just guided self-education. Works well enough for me, but it has some serious pitfalls when considering how much money is spent on it.
I Dont understand 37:22 where Sir Field says that (h over mass of electron multiplied by C) is momentum transferred, this contradicts the first statement he made that the (h over mass of electron multiplied by C) has the dimensions of wavelength! Im confused
1 Electrons in solid entangled such that their spin all are up /down. In Liquid alignment are mixed. In gaseous state spins are untangled. Viscosity may be promotional to ratio entanglement. B-E condensate all entangled electron are either up or Down 2 E= mc squared. And plane Plane kinetic energy is partially converted into potential energy because of buoyancy in air. What could be the medium in e= mc2 if any involved.vhiggs field or quantum field are possible candidates
16:46 “Particles… Can annihilate each other“ waves don’t annihilate each other. Destructive interference is not destruction. It’s a temporary illusion of destruction.
There are neither particles nor waves here. There are only quanta of energy. Quanta give rise to a number of phenomena. A large number of quanta of the FREE theory (free as in free of self interaction) can give rise to mean field theories that look a lot like classical waves. Individual charged quanta can undergo annihilation processes but those are NOT part of the free theory. In an annihilation process we have at least two quantum fields (the charged fermionic field and an uncharged bosonic field) that are interacting with each other. Totally different physics.
Fresh = Se-gar Im-aging. When I want to write Lily, the image of Mr. Weigener holding a cigarette with his right hand appear. Q.M. is something else. N.
just in the last two days I saw a new discovery of a material that changes drastically it's insulation/conductivity properties with a magnetic field. what would cause that to happen?
It's not clear from the title of the lecture or the intro that this has to do with quantum mechanics - maybe that could be updated? I get notified for MIT OpenCourseWare TH-cam videos and usually find time to watch - because they're generally exceptional. But before starting to watch this video I had no idea what "historical background" referred to. But glad it's quantum mechanics so got lucky this time :)
@Thomas Abbott sure thing but that's not my point. Educational videos can't presume people will know the subject or it loses traction (and debatable its purpose)
Thanks for the suggestion. The best way to find out more is to visit the complete course site on OCW: ocw.mit.edu/5-61F17. Overall, this course is an introduction to quantum mechanics, but geared toward teaching concepts that will be useful to chemists.
Textbook McQuarrie, Donald A. Quantum Chemistry, 2nd Edition. University Science Books, 2007. ISBN: 9781891389504. See the materials for more info at: ocw.mit.edu/5-61F17. Best wishes on your studies!
See matter as Loose association of things.... The ultimate unit....may...doesn't have to be one thing.....isnt it human.. Maybe a collection....std mdel?
It is part of a chemistry degree. See the MIT Chemistry degree program pages for more info at: chemistry.mit.edu/academic-programs/undergraduate-programs/chemistry-major-chem-flex/. Best wishes on your studies!
Because white light is combination of different colours of light which inturn have different wave lenghts.... And we want monochromatic light with single wavelenth
Interferemce is observed when more then one sources of light is present or a sourece is split into two.... In this case we have oNly one source of ligt
Beacuse we want to observe....the number of electrons ejected from metal surface and their enegy for each frequency separatly.....so that we can analyse the data and conclude trend.... If we use many frequencies at same time(white light) we would be unable to fine result
1° - Quantum Chemistry (Donald A. McQuarrie) 2° - Spectra and Dynamics of Small Molecules: Alexander Von Humboldt Lectures (Robert W. Field) 3° - Quantum Mechanics (COHEN-TANNOUDJI, CLAUDE)
Do you mean these? - Quantum Chemistry by Donald A. McQuarrie - Spectra and Dynamics of Small Molecules by Field, Robert W. - (Alexander von Humboldt lectures) - Quantum Mechanics by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, Frank Laloe All of these are also listed under the "Reading" Section of the course website you can find in the description (first link), including buying links on Amazon.
@@mitocw In the description is Physical Chemistry, but he told that it's not typical undergraduate QUANTUM MECHANICS class. Is it a mistake in the description?(writing comment before viewed whole video)
I won't like if my professor start teaching me like this. He's just throwing out concepts without giving any insights. Maybe it's a review class that's why he's only giving mathematics equations and different concepts but if it's first class. I would most definitely not take his class. Physics without insight is plane Maths which is boring. He should supplement various equations with experiment and thought experiment so that audience can develope an intuition about quantum mechanics. Of course I'm not new to these concept so it's a breeze for me but someone who's just learning this. It's nothing more than just many mathematics equations and subtopics of quantum mechanics.
Connor Colestock read again what I said. If he's only reviewing the concepts and has already been taught ad nauseam, then it's fine. But if he's introducing these concept for first time, this certainly is not the best way.
Maybe it's on you to do a better job learning, you have access to the internet (obviously) it's not like you paid for the course. Education isn't spoon feeding.
17:39 “What is new?” “it’s C over Llamada”. 😢😢😢I listened to this twice. And then I got it. It’s a dad joke. does anyone else get it? i’m actually personally against making jokes during a lecture. Unless you specify that it’s a joke. Because the material is so difficult and basically impossible to understand, that this distraction is extremely frustrating. I see this behavior from many professional academics. It feels like a little patronizing and in general it detracts from the learning experience.
starts at 8:59. 10:51 spectroscopy encodes what we need to know about elements; 12:15 matrix model is more usable; 16:27 interference
31:25 Compton Scattering
Thanks
I love evening tests. Keeps me out of the bars.
i like them because i can go celebrate at the bar right away
The best thing about the Internet is that you can learn from many different people. I started this video and then skipped through, and this guy reminded me of when I had to rely completely the on the assigned book. I scrolled to the comments and at the top and I see people commenting about how he is hard to follow, or say he should teach in a certain way. I just want to post and let M.i.T know that if that want bright minds doing research and studying cutting edge subjects that perfectly fine. but how are we the next generation to take over the work if it not being taught right. This video is evidence that a lot of top schools don't have the best teachers they have great student that will go through hell and high water to understand the subject. Please make it easier on your student and hire people who can teach. and keep the people who are just good for research in the lab away from people where they belong. also a pay cut. why give them a check for teaching if they can't teach? give them a check for being a researcher only!
In my opinion, college is just guided self-education. Works well enough for me, but it has some serious pitfalls when considering how much money is spent on it.
@@adityavarma193 You're paying tuition only for a 'guide', network and a degree. And of course, some potential friends on the side.
I really liked that camera angle with the bokeh. Not sure if it added anything to the learning but it was beautiful nonetheless
16:58 QM exploits that particles can cancel each other
17:52 “What is new?“ In general it is considered impolite to use double meaning.
Anyone else thinks this class went way fast because of how enjoyable it was??
I Dont understand 37:22 where Sir Field says that (h over mass of electron multiplied by C) is momentum transferred, this contradicts the first statement he made that the (h over mass of electron multiplied by C) has the dimensions of wavelength! Im confused
1
Electrons in solid entangled such that their spin all are up /down. In Liquid alignment are mixed. In gaseous state spins are untangled. Viscosity may be promotional to ratio entanglement. B-E condensate all entangled electron are either up or Down
2 E= mc squared. And plane
Plane kinetic energy is partially converted into potential energy because of buoyancy in air. What could be the medium in e= mc2 if any involved.vhiggs field or quantum field are possible candidates
16:46 “Particles… Can annihilate each other“ waves don’t annihilate each other. Destructive interference is not destruction. It’s a temporary illusion of destruction.
There are neither particles nor waves here. There are only quanta of energy. Quanta give rise to a number of phenomena. A large number of quanta of the FREE theory (free as in free of self interaction) can give rise to mean field theories that look a lot like classical waves. Individual charged quanta can undergo annihilation processes but those are NOT part of the free theory. In an annihilation process we have at least two quantum fields (the charged fermionic field and an uncharged bosonic field) that are interacting with each other. Totally different physics.
Amazing content for free
why is there a delay between E and B field?
25:55 “particles” 👎. why “particles”?????
Loving your class Professor Field. Thank you 〰〰〰➰〰〰〰🔛
Fresh = Se-gar
Im-aging.
When I want to write Lily, the image of Mr. Weigener holding a cigarette with his right hand appear.
Q.M. is something else.
N.
What such a kindness .
Thank you .
just in the last two days I saw a new discovery of a material that changes drastically it's insulation/conductivity properties with a magnetic field. what would cause that to happen?
37:01 Compton wavelength of the e.
It's not clear from the title of the lecture or the intro that this has to do with quantum mechanics - maybe that could be updated? I get notified for MIT OpenCourseWare TH-cam videos and usually find time to watch - because they're generally exceptional. But before starting to watch this video I had no idea what "historical background" referred to.
But glad it's quantum mechanics so got lucky this time :)
@Thomas Abbott sure thing but that's not my point. Educational videos can't presume people will know the subject or it loses traction (and debatable its purpose)
Thanks for the suggestion. The best way to find out more is to visit the complete course site on OCW: ocw.mit.edu/5-61F17. Overall, this course is an introduction to quantum mechanics, but geared toward teaching concepts that will be useful to chemists.
Is this a Bachelor level course or a Master level course?
This is an undergraduate course. For more info and materials see ocw.mit.edu/5-61F17.
Even though I’ve already took once the quantum physics class, I’m still so confused.....
if quantum doesn't shocked you ,or it doesn't confuse you than you are not understanding Quantum?
Suggestibility..?
Please could someone tell what is the books name and who write it ,as sir
Showed in beginning of lecture
The books are listed on the complete OCW course site Syllabus page ocw.mit.edu/5-61F17. Best wishes on your studies!
10:51
17:30 I'll try that sir
please make a playlist of all the videos in this lecture series. Thanks!
As the description states, the playlist for this course is: th-cam.com/play/PLUl4u3cNGP62RsEHXe48Imi9-87FzQaJg.html. Best wishes on your studies!
Please someone tell what is the books name and who write it ,as sir
Showed in beginning of lecture
Textbook
McQuarrie, Donald A. Quantum Chemistry, 2nd Edition. University Science Books, 2007. ISBN: 9781891389504.
See the materials for more info at: ocw.mit.edu/5-61F17. Best wishes on your studies!
See matter as Loose association of things....
The ultimate unit....may...doesn't have to be one thing.....isnt it human..
Maybe a collection....std mdel?
is this class part of the Physics degree? or the Chemistry degree?
It is part of a chemistry degree. See the MIT Chemistry degree program pages for more info at: chemistry.mit.edu/academic-programs/undergraduate-programs/chemistry-major-chem-flex/. Best wishes on your studies!
why we don't use white light in compton effect?
Because white light is combination of different colours of light which inturn have different wave lenghts....
And we want monochromatic light with single wavelenth
If so , than we must see a interferance ..also...?? What you say about that??
Interferemce is observed when more then one sources of light is present or a sourece is split into two....
In this case we have oNly one source of ligt
Yup ....but again ,why we need to use monochromatic light?
Beacuse we want to observe....the number of electrons ejected from metal surface and their enegy for each frequency separatly.....so that we can analyse the data and conclude trend....
If we use many frequencies at same time(white light) we would be unable to fine result
Why is time taken to be invariant when conducting experiments?
DeclineScore timestamp?
@@shankysays 9:05 are the experiments identical if they are done at different times?
awesome! Great lecture.
will be able to put subtitles in Spanish?
Go to settings->subtitles/CC->auto translate and choose Spanish from the menu.
Then click on CC. Just tried it now. Works great.
Great! 🌸
chemist love talking about the double slit experiment
Thanks ❤️🤍
He shows some books. I can't ride the titles of those books, anybody can?
1° - Quantum Chemistry (Donald A. McQuarrie)
2° - Spectra and Dynamics of Small Molecules: Alexander Von Humboldt Lectures (Robert W. Field)
3° - Quantum Mechanics (COHEN-TANNOUDJI, CLAUDE)
Do you mean these?
- Quantum Chemistry by Donald A. McQuarrie
- Spectra and Dynamics of Small Molecules by Field, Robert W. - (Alexander von Humboldt lectures)
- Quantum Mechanics by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, Frank Laloe
All of these are also listed under the "Reading" Section of the course website you can find in the description (first link), including buying links on Amazon.
I can't read... thanks for your answer
You'll also find the book references on the Syllabus and Readings sections of the OCW course site: ocw.mit.edu/5-61F17. Good luck with your studies!
@@mitocw In the description is Physical Chemistry, but he told that it's not typical undergraduate QUANTUM MECHANICS class. Is it a mistake in the description?(writing comment before viewed whole video)
i'm from Egypt doctor and i'm seeing the lectures
How does the camera capture your image?
1080p is permium .😮
Bsc.....neural....
Oflactory.......in the lecture....
I sensed Intel...
Then.....friend...or
No foe...
Oflactory end
Learnin initiate..
好大的板擦，強
Incredible that his voice holds out for 36 lectures. Be careful, sir.
What are the books prof suggested?can someone name them?
The books are listed on the complete OCW course site Syllabus page ocw.mit.edu/5-61F17, and you'll find the notes there as well.
Kind of surprised that in 2019, MIT still uses chalkboards. I went to Purdue in 1991 and they were using whiteboards even back then.
feeling perturbed ;)
with all respects, he speaks so slowly that at 2x speed, the video sounded super normal
I won't like if my professor start teaching me like this. He's just throwing out concepts without giving any insights. Maybe it's a review class that's why he's only giving mathematics equations and different concepts but if it's first class. I would most definitely not take his class. Physics without insight is plane Maths which is boring. He should supplement various equations with experiment and thought experiment so that audience can develope an intuition about quantum mechanics. Of course I'm not new to these concept so it's a breeze for me but someone who's just learning this. It's nothing more than just many mathematics equations and subtopics of quantum mechanics.
weak. Perfect for learning. There are prerequisites that he is referring to, and which he expects students to raise their standard to.
Connor Colestock read again what I said. If he's only reviewing the concepts and has already been taught ad nauseam, then it's fine. But if he's introducing these concept for first time, this certainly is not the best way.
Why would he be introducing new concepts already? Also, if he were it wouldn't be a big deal. Sometimes there is just too much material to cover.
Connor Colestock learning something in depth is better than learning everything but having a shallow understanding.
Maybe it's on you to do a better job learning, you have access to the internet (obviously) it's not like you paid for the course. Education isn't spoon feeding.
شباب اكو احد هنا لو اني هنا وحدي ؟
#QuanNoQuit!
real life walter white
17:39 “What is new?” “it’s C over Llamada”. 😢😢😢I listened to this twice. And then I got it. It’s a dad joke. does anyone else get it? i’m actually personally against making jokes during a lecture. Unless you specify that it’s a joke. Because the material is so difficult and basically impossible to understand, that this distraction is extremely frustrating. I see this behavior from many professional academics. It feels like a little patronizing and in general it detracts from the learning experience.
Arya let me smile....easier..
Third
Lecture linguistics.....try not to tie in life to learning quality.....like learning isn't everythin...like money isn't....death anxiety....
Interesting....students trained for disbelieving even confirmed science......better pedagogy?
Bad start to the class. Lacking proper introduction and interesting examples. Usually a problem with most PChem instructors
First
Love the lecture but the Prof sounds like he is going through puberty, or needs a cough drop and glass of warm water. But very good course.
This is helpful ❤️🤍