Quran doesn't explicitly negate the second coming of Isa (AS). But that doesn't mean we can introduce stories and make it a part of the faith and fight tooth and nail to keep it.
Quran explicitly mentions that on the day of resurrection Isa (AS) wouldn’t have any knowledge of what happened on earth after he was (raised). Clearly negating any notion of a second coming.
@@FahimusAlimus Al-Ma'idah - Verse 116 وَإِذْ قَالَ ٱللَّهُ يَـٰعِيسَى ٱبْنَ مَرْيَمَ ءَأَنتَ قُلْتَ لِلنَّاسِ ٱتَّخِذُونِى وَأُمِّىَ إِلَـٰهَيْنِ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ ۖ قَالَ سُبْحَـٰنَكَ مَا يَكُونُ لِىٓ أَنْ أَقُولَ مَا لَيْسَ لِى بِحَقٍّ ۚ إِن كُنتُ قُلْتُهُۥ فَقَدْ عَلِمْتَهُۥ ۚ تَعْلَمُ مَا فِى نَفْسِى وَلَآ أَعْلَمُ مَا فِى نَفْسِكَ ۚ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ عَلَّـٰمُ ٱلْغُيُوبِ And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Did you ever ask the people to worship you and your mother as gods besides Allah?” He will answer, “Glory be to You! How could I ever say what I had no right to say? If I had said such a thing, you would have certainly known it. You know what is ˹hidden˺ within me, but I do not know what is within You. Indeed, You ˹alone˺ are the Knower of all unseen. Al-Ma'idah - Verse 117 مَا قُلْتُ لَهُمْ إِلَّا مَآ أَمَرْتَنِى بِهِۦٓ أَنِ ٱعْبُدُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ رَبِّى وَرَبَّكُمْ ۚ وَكُنتُ عَلَيْهِمْ شَهِيدًا مَّا دُمْتُ فِيهِمْ ۖ فَلَمَّا تَوَفَّيْتَنِى كُنتَ أَنتَ ٱلرَّقِيبَ عَلَيْهِمْ ۚ وَأَنتَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَىْءٍ شَهِيدٌ I never told them anything except what You ordered me to say: “Worship Allah-my Lord and your Lord!” And I was witness over them as long as I remained among them. But when You took me, You were the Witness over them-and You are a Witness over all things.”
Actually it's more plausible that Quran supports the "death" narrative, because "tawaffi" is used for death in the Quran many times. Only thing that lends a little support to the hadith narrative is the use of the word "raaf'uka"
@The Real Joe Biden You have half answered your own question. Honest or not a mistake is termed “wrong” or incorrect. If you have watched the video it’s very clear that Shadi has incorrectly painted a picture that ibn Ashur condemns the idea that Jesus died, yet he’s famous for favouring this very idea. Anyway the video does a good job of highlighting and question you or anyone may have so after watching it if you’re still convinced on shades error that’s fine and your choice.
So it is ok to call other Muslims mushriks, kaafirs, murtads, out of the fold of Islam, declare their blood as halal for the Muslims and declare their females as halal for the Muslims to rape, forcibly marry or keep as female sex slaves and also to sell them on the slave market, that’s right reinstitute slavery so therefore slavery is permissible too, this is all ok I guess but no nicknames even when people for an agenda purposely misquote and attribute falsehoods to God, to allah and to the Messenger. If a Muslim kills ten million Muslims else must not call him anything such as a nut job or a Wahhabi madman (for example a Wahhabi madman like Abubakar Al-Baghdadi), I’m sure God will be ok with me calling such a person a madman because there is a lot worse than that needing to be said.
i would say, compare the life of the prophet SAW and of his shining stars versus mufti layth. if the latter resembles in character, decorum, personality, conduct etc even in the slightest then i find him truthful and trust worthy. But his personification is completely opposite, so how can someone have the audacity to say what they say? he talks about representing the honour of the prophet saw and allah swt but is flagrantly twisting and distorting the traditional teaching. a dark cloud overhangs on the ummat, and people must jolt themselves out of this total nonesense
Mufti Abu Layth, from what I can garner, it seems that there is nothing to substantiate the idea that Imam Malik believed in a Second Coming of Jesus and at least a significant group from the people of Medina, shared his opinion as well? If such is the case, do you think these innovations were a product of political motives, particularly between the people who either favored the Ummayads and Abbassids. It is interesting that they tie these events to a place like Damascus, Syria and they found easy way to pass off in areas like Iraq, which were a hotbed of chaos and fitna?
Mufti, please if you could answer my question, Thus it is related that a person told the Prophet that his preoccupations hindered him from sticking to the five daily prayers. So the Prophet instructed him to keep to the 'asrani only. The man asked: "What are the"asrani't"The Prophet said: "A prayer before sunrise and a prayer before sunset".120The virtue of these prayers is stressed also in the following statement of the Prophet: "He who prays before the rising of the sun and before its setting will not enterhell"."!The prayers of thefairand the"asrwere also calledal-bardani,i.e. the cool ones. The Prophet reportedly stated: "He who prays thebardaniwill enter paradise".122 I read this in a book about the morning and evening prayers And there is a hadith in sahih bukhari that says that if you pray the morning and evening prayers you will go to heaven. This contradicts with the obligatory 5 prayer rule. Please answer me. If the hadith is correct then you can't say 5 obligatory prayers because it would contradict
According to Quran you have to pray 3 Times! I cant understand why you follow hadith which contradict Quraan. Which is more important, the eternal uncreated quran which is in heaven, or the hadiths which are written 250-350 years after Mohamad? Pray as its in quran, 3 times and its fine. Mufti Abu Layth is not allah or mohamad. This is my opinion.
@@John-qs3ih prayer is not something that should be taken out of quran or hadith books. Prayer is in sunnah which passes through generation by generation by ijma. Sunnah doesn't need any book. According to sunnah there are 5 prayers. How many times, how to prayer, when to prayer etc is all in sunnah. Also hadiths are not sunnah. Hadiths and sunnah are two completely different things.
The word مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ / Mutawaffika has two meanings. Both connotations refer to the detachment of the soul from the body. The initial interpretation pertains to the soul's detachment during sleep, while the second interpretation involves the permanent separation of the soul from the body upon death, with no possibility of return. In the case of Eesa (peace be upon him), the Quran employs the sleep connotation. This is evident from other verses that say he was neither killed nor crucified. Additionally, another verse suggests that Eesa's (peace be upon him) return signifies a significant sign indicating the nearing of Judgment Day. Approximately 30 Hadiths discuss his second coming. In essence, to arrive at your false premise(he died), one would need to deliberately overlook both the Quran and numerous Hadiths, while being carelessly dismissive. No points for you on this one.
30 Hadeeths from one person. Why hasn't Abu Bakr, Uthman, Omar, Ali, or other great Sahaba give us warning on something so huge. Imam Malik also didn't accept these hadeeths as well.
This guy should take his own advice, and of course he doesn't believe shady has a PhD because he doesn't have one himself, he is not on the level of shady el masry, but because he is maliki he feels like bashing shady to make himself look better
@@exploreMauritius I agree, but why is exactly mufti Abu layth bashing shady el masry ? And this isn't his first time either,(of course their both supposed representatives of Maliki fiqh,and shady el masry is more Maliki apparently ) most Maliki's if not all of them believe in the second coming of christ, and mufti Abu layth knows this but wants to make it seem as if imam tahir bin ashur agrees with his heresy
abu layth likes spending time with half-naked (or totally naked) girls/women, he is preoccupied with making himself more and more bulkier, it is apparent from the very first glimpse at him, but despite it there are people who continue to admire him. why such people (like abu layth) roam the planet freely causing mischief on earth?! is not anyone out there to put an end to such people?!
That's an accusation, do you have proof he has extra marital affairs? It's fine to disagree with him but to make accusations without evidence isn't good adaab.
![วันเกิดเธอ (TO YOU) - PHUWIN [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_ROx1Bj3T0Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Quran doesn't explicitly negate the second coming of Isa (AS). But that doesn't mean we can introduce stories and make it a part of the faith and fight tooth and nail to keep it.
Doesn’t explicitly mention it either and everything related to its belief is shown unreliable.
Quran explicitly mentions that on the day of resurrection Isa (AS) wouldn’t have any knowledge of what happened on earth after he was (raised). Clearly negating any notion of a second coming.
@@hamadi619 where does it say that?
@@FahimusAlimus Al-Ma'idah - Verse 116
وَإِذْ قَالَ ٱللَّهُ يَـٰعِيسَى ٱبْنَ مَرْيَمَ ءَأَنتَ قُلْتَ لِلنَّاسِ ٱتَّخِذُونِى وَأُمِّىَ إِلَـٰهَيْنِ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ ۖ قَالَ سُبْحَـٰنَكَ مَا يَكُونُ لِىٓ أَنْ أَقُولَ مَا لَيْسَ لِى بِحَقٍّ ۚ إِن كُنتُ قُلْتُهُۥ فَقَدْ عَلِمْتَهُۥ ۚ تَعْلَمُ مَا فِى نَفْسِى وَلَآ أَعْلَمُ مَا فِى نَفْسِكَ ۚ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ عَلَّـٰمُ ٱلْغُيُوبِ
And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Did you ever ask the people to worship you and your mother as gods besides Allah?” He will answer, “Glory be to You! How could I ever say what I had no right to say? If I had said such a thing, you would have certainly known it. You know what is ˹hidden˺ within me, but I do not know what is within You. Indeed, You ˹alone˺ are the Knower of all unseen.
Al-Ma'idah - Verse 117
مَا قُلْتُ لَهُمْ إِلَّا مَآ أَمَرْتَنِى بِهِۦٓ أَنِ ٱعْبُدُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ رَبِّى وَرَبَّكُمْ ۚ وَكُنتُ عَلَيْهِمْ شَهِيدًا مَّا دُمْتُ فِيهِمْ ۖ فَلَمَّا تَوَفَّيْتَنِى كُنتَ أَنتَ ٱلرَّقِيبَ عَلَيْهِمْ ۚ وَأَنتَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَىْءٍ شَهِيدٌ
I never told them anything except what You ordered me to say: “Worship Allah-my Lord and your Lord!” And I was witness over them as long as I remained among them. But when You took me, You were the Witness over them-and You are a Witness over all things.”
Actually it's more plausible that Quran supports the "death" narrative, because "tawaffi" is used for death in the Quran many times. Only thing that lends a little support to the hadith narrative is the use of the word "raaf'uka"
You can’t really disagree with the point being made. The takfiri Shadi is clearly wrong.
@The Real Joe Biden You have half answered your own question. Honest or not a mistake is termed “wrong” or incorrect. If you have watched the video it’s very clear that Shadi has incorrectly painted a picture that ibn Ashur condemns the idea that Jesus died, yet he’s famous for favouring this very idea. Anyway the video does a good job of highlighting and question you or anyone may have so after watching it if you’re still convinced on shades error that’s fine and your choice.
And do not insult one another and do not call each other by [offensive] nicknames.
Quran 49:11
So it is ok to call other Muslims mushriks, kaafirs, murtads, out of the fold of Islam, declare their blood as halal for the Muslims and declare their females as halal for the Muslims to rape, forcibly marry or keep as female sex slaves and also to sell them on the slave market, that’s right reinstitute slavery so therefore slavery is permissible too, this is all ok I guess but no nicknames even when people for an agenda purposely misquote and attribute falsehoods to God, to allah and to the Messenger. If a Muslim kills ten million Muslims else must not call him anything such as a nut job or a Wahhabi madman (for example a Wahhabi madman like Abubakar Al-Baghdadi), I’m sure God will be ok with me calling such a person a madman because there is a lot worse than that needing to be said.
Asalaam aleikom mufti. jazaika Allahu gairan for waking up the ummah to think..❤👍
i would say, compare the life of the prophet SAW and of his shining stars versus mufti layth. if the latter resembles in character, decorum, personality, conduct etc even in the slightest then i find him truthful and trust worthy.
But his personification is completely opposite, so how can someone have the audacity to say what they say? he talks about representing the honour of the prophet saw and allah swt but is flagrantly twisting and distorting the traditional teaching.
a dark cloud overhangs on the ummat, and people must jolt themselves out of this total nonesense
I don't know what I'm doing awake but here I am xD
Mufti Abu Layth, from what I can garner, it seems that there is nothing to substantiate the idea that Imam Malik believed in a Second Coming of Jesus and at least a significant group from the people of Medina, shared his opinion as well?
If such is the case, do you think these innovations were a product of political motives, particularly between the people who either favored the Ummayads and Abbassids. It is interesting that they tie these events to a place like Damascus, Syria and they found easy way to pass off in areas like Iraq, which were a hotbed of chaos and fitna?
A “PhD” in America is basically an 11th grade education in Europe.
bro what that's just wrong
Lots of love
From masala to spice ...wow mufti ur updation is better than Microsoft xp
Mufti I ❤️ your personality. Your bloody hilarious
🔥🔥🔥🔥
Mufti, please if you could answer my question,
Thus it is related that a person told the Prophet that his preoccupations hindered him from sticking to the five daily prayers. So the Prophet instructed him to keep to the 'asrani only. The man asked: "What are the"asrani't"The Prophet said: "A prayer before sunrise and a prayer before sunset".120The virtue of these prayers is stressed also in the following statement of the Prophet: "He who prays before the rising of the sun and before its setting will not enterhell"."!The prayers of thefairand the"asrwere also calledal-bardani,i.e. the cool ones. The Prophet reportedly stated: "He who prays thebardaniwill enter paradise".122
I read this in a book about the morning and evening prayers
And there is a hadith in sahih bukhari that says that if you pray the morning and evening prayers you will go to heaven. This contradicts with the obligatory 5 prayer rule. Please answer me. If the hadith is correct then you can't say 5 obligatory prayers because it would contradict
Praying doesnt do anything, according to allah you have your destiny either you go heaven or hell. But your chance is 73/1
According to Quran you have to pray 3 Times! I cant understand why you follow hadith which contradict Quraan. Which is more important, the eternal uncreated quran which is in heaven, or the hadiths which are written 250-350 years after Mohamad? Pray as its in quran, 3 times and its fine.
Mufti Abu Layth is not allah or mohamad. This is my opinion.
.... And from this we learn that you should focus on things in life you have a clue about...
@@John-qs3ih Ofc they follow the praised one.
@@John-qs3ih prayer is not something that should be taken out of quran or hadith books. Prayer is in sunnah which passes through generation by generation by ijma. Sunnah doesn't need any book. According to sunnah there are 5 prayers.
How many times, how to prayer, when to prayer etc is all in sunnah.
Also hadiths are not sunnah. Hadiths and sunnah are two completely different things.
The word مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ / Mutawaffika has two meanings. Both connotations refer to the detachment of the soul from the body. The initial interpretation pertains to the soul's detachment during sleep, while the second interpretation involves the permanent separation of the soul from the body upon death, with no possibility of return. In the case of Eesa (peace be upon him), the Quran employs the sleep connotation. This is evident from other verses that say he was neither killed nor crucified. Additionally, another verse suggests that Eesa's (peace be upon him) return signifies a significant sign indicating the nearing of Judgment Day.
Approximately 30 Hadiths discuss his second coming. In essence, to arrive at your false premise(he died), one would need to deliberately overlook both the Quran and numerous Hadiths, while being carelessly dismissive. No points for you on this one.
30 Hadeeths from one person. Why hasn't Abu Bakr, Uthman, Omar, Ali, or other great Sahaba give us warning on something so huge. Imam Malik also didn't accept these hadeeths as well.
Shadi Al Masri is a pompous dude, well intended but pompous in a way which makes him unwatchable
This guy should take his own advice, and of course he doesn't believe shady has a PhD because he doesn't have one himself, he is not on the level of shady el masry, but because he is maliki he feels like bashing shady to make himself look better
Wrong. Dr. Masri was properly refuted by MALM. Have you Even watched the whole video( without being biased) ?
Lol. You can have a PhD in basically anything nowadays. Doesn't mean you are knowledgeable about everything. Do you even know what a phD is? BOI
@@exploreMauritius I agree, but why is exactly mufti Abu layth bashing shady el masry ? And this isn't his first time either,(of course their both supposed representatives of Maliki fiqh,and shady el masry is more Maliki apparently ) most Maliki's if not all of them believe in the second coming of christ, and mufti Abu layth knows this but wants to make it seem as if imam tahir bin ashur agrees with his heresy
I bet you didnt watch the video
@@lordrisen3696just because you thought this story was authentic and became attached to it, doesn’t make it true. Dig deeper
Muffdiver Abu lulli hari ram al kanjar.
Got mufti in his name and beard like that, promoting music as well smhhhh
@@thebutcher319 😂😂 auothubillah
abu layth likes spending time with half-naked (or totally naked) girls/women, he is preoccupied with making himself more and more bulkier, it is apparent from the very first glimpse at him, but despite it there are people who continue to admire him. why such people (like abu layth) roam the planet freely causing mischief on earth?! is not anyone out there to put an end to such people?!
Wahhabi alert 🚨
@@belowed1190 I dunno if that guys statement is true or not but I just wanna say wahabi is a funny term coming from a twirler sooofee
That's an accusation, do you have proof he has extra marital affairs? It's fine to disagree with him but to make accusations without evidence isn't good adaab.
Damn bro you want to end people's lives just because they disagree with you? 😂😂😂
what's wrong with getting muscular looool