@@allybally0021 it is reported that the Sampson and S1850M radars that the HMS Duncan are equipped with have a 400km/250mile range. The video states that the HMS Duncan was 30miles off the coast of Crimea which was the direction of where the jets came from. So you could say that HMS Duncan had them on radar as soon as they took off and climbed to an altitude that could seen by the radars. The Russian pilots would have known they were on radar as well as their avionics would have detected it and warned them if they were being pinged or targeted/locked up by other radars. Those MIGs could have avoided radar detection by staying really low to the ground but i don't think the kremlin and Crimean citizens would appreciate 17 jets almost going supersonic at tree level fly over their heads. Ive heard a flight of four or five F-15s fly overhead pretty low and slow and even those were pretty loud. I wouldnt want even one of them to go supersonic at tree level right above me
@@Rose.Of.Hizaki Hi I appreciate your thoughts. I think it all depends on the radar lobes, altitude and terrain when they would be acquired. Maybe they were picked-up as soon as they took-off but I suspect there are supplementary sources of this information. The idea of low altitude flights are not that remarkable though. Military jets regularly follow terrain at 250ft agl (or much lower in truth) and whilst noisy it is nothing new. They would not need to be supersonic or anything near it. Most are circa 450knots on dry thrust.
@@allybally0021 Well, its all speculation but im sure the MoD as well as the captain and navigators on board the ship knew that the airfield was there and it would be easy to correlate between the location of the airfield on the map and where the dots suddenly appeared on the radar - although they could have also come from a different airfield but nobody knows apart from the ships crew or maybe the film crew. Since it tv shows like these often exaggerate tensions because thats what brings in the views. The same way people tune in to Kitchen Nightmares with Gordon Ramsey. While i did say that the radar onboard the Duncan has pretty long range. I guess for most of us, that is theoretical as terrain and tall buildings can mess with the actual distance. ---- even if not supersonic. Jets are still loud and depending on the country youre from. There are rules or laws in place that restrict jets from going too fast due to the noise especially if the airfield is located near to a heavily populated area or the jets need to fly over populated areas to get where they need to go. At least here n the UK there are altitude and distance requirements that restrict jets from going supersonic over heavily populated areas unless it was an emergency like the Jets needed to go and intercept something -- and sonic booms are LOUD and can be heard for absolutely miles. UK airspace is limited to 250knots under 10000ft. 17 jets flying super low to the ground still isnt a fun experience. At least for the people on the ground. You can make the argument of an airshow but i dont think the organisers would let 17 jets buzz the spectators at tree level.
The Type 45 is such a wicked ship. I think the Russians were actually seeing how many targets the warship could track/engage at once. I don't think they liked the answer they got.
In an actual attack the attacking aircraft don't usually stick around. As soon as they were in range they would pop off all of their missiles and run for home
@@michaelcraig8860 Dream on, Russians jets would have launched sea skimming anti ship long missiles from 50 to 100km (multiple launches of missiles) , at least dozen missiles would have hit the RAN ship ,the rest taken out by the ship's anti missile systems.
In early spring in the mid 70's HMS Bacchante sailed in complete radio and radar silence around the North Cape, and as far as the White Sea. It was so cold the sea began freezing around the ship, and I had to keep the Seacat launcher running to keep the hydraulic oil warm, or at least not so cold that the breaker tripped. The reason the crew was given was that the Russians had been hassling our trawlers in the area. I'm not convinced of that! We reached the White Sea undetected (probably probing defences was our real reason). At which point we could have returned undetected. However there is no point going there and not leaving a calling card. We turned on the navigation radar for just one revolution, and within 15 minutes there were planes and ships everywhere! Exciting times!
@@seanbrewer2703 on the contrary, they know all our frequencies, as we know there's. The whole point was to give them the heads up we had got there undetected
@@obvious-troll Speed is not everything too hit a jet. It is not a stationary object and every jets also carry minimum 6-8 missile. If it so easy to attack Russia than war monger country like Britain will never miss that opportunity.
@@Tom_Cruise_Missile Well, actually that's not true. The U-2 is still in service with the 9th Recon wing and the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing. It's true the US needed titanium for the SR-71, which they acquired from the Soviet Union to make 'pizza ovens' lol
@@dogekoko9865 It's almost like 1 ship isnt supposed to do everything because theyre in fleets with multiple other ships that each have their own specialised purpose
@Iain Campbell type 45s have slow moving non stealthy missle and there are only 8 of them mean while russian ships have mach 4 kitchen missles that penetrate air defences easily
Yeah our nosy heroes 30 miles into hostile country a long journey from. Home 3000 kilometers away. What a waste of British pounds... they could spent billions for war but struggling to house our homeless brits🤑🤑🤑
@@SAGAWISIW30 That could be achieved by curtailing the amount of immigrants flooding into our country. Great Britain has always had a proud maritime history & I for one deeply respect those who are our armed forces. We're it not for the likes of my dad who fought in WW2 you would not have been in the position to make your disrespectful comment.
@@dlmdee Do you honestly believe we leave our country unprotected? I guess you've never played poker for money. Probably just a tubby middle aged guy with testicles the size of peanuts. My Dad fought in WW2 in the battle of El Alamein. My first cousin fought for our country. I've friends in the Royal Navy. Our shores are not undefended you total muppet
@@dlmdee For your further information it's called a 'Projection of Force'. We stopped projecting around the time of the Nazi & being timid like you our country nearly was bombed into the ground. We have an elite navy. We for instance still prevent piracy & slavery. In my block of apartments lives a a Royal Marine veteran. I'm so proud of this man & anything he needs I will make sure it happens for him. Instead of being a wimp ensure that through appropriate voting we maintain a strong armed forces. An example is the so called Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank which is just the upgrade of the Challenger 2. We need a new MBT. I could go on but I doubt you would comprehend
0:30 Funnily the shout after the BBC reporter explains it is for another plane was for a surface ship radar. Top Plate is the radar fitted to Russian warships, Slotback is the radar fitted to the SU-27 Flanker and Dropkick is the radar fitted to the SU-24.
It's weird watching this in September of 2022 and knowing that most of those russian pilots are probably dead now and that russia was always a paper tiger .
Some of the comments are hilarious now. Burnt tanks, smashed aircraft, dead conscripts and sunken ships tell the real story of Russia’s modern military. When they started pulling out the Moisin-Nagants and 1960’s tanks you almost started feeling sorry for the stupid idiots over there still saying “yes vladi, at once” and not standing up for themselves and turning on the leadership. Ah well, war never changes.
Dead? Since 2018? Hardly. They were all getting practice for sinking Her Majesty's Ships that are foolishly sent into the Black Sea. Regardless of all the agreements that the Black Sea is open waters, the fact remains that the Black Sea is a Russian pond. They control every inch of it and could easily sink every surface ship of the Royal Navy and the US Navy in about an hour and a half. The hypersonic missiles Putin introduced to the world in 2018 are indeed a game changer. All those carrier battle groups are mere defenseless targets for Russia if the west becomes stupid enough to launch on Russia. By the way, only Russia has actual air defenses rather than over-priced junk such as "Patriot" missiles that are simply a vehicle for transferring masses of currency from the taxpayer to Raytheon, Lockheed, Grumman, etc. None of the US "wonder weapons" are effective in combat as witness how things are going for the US/NATO in Ukraine. If Russia decides to fight like the US fights, i.e., flatten cities full of civilians and then send in the infantry, the Special Military Operation in Ukraine would end in about one day.
@@johnbrooks7144 Wow , dude. That's the most bullshit , cringe/cope propaganda I've ever seen in a reply . Things must be going really badly for putin right now ,huh? Maybe you'd like to explain how the russian navy got it's ass handed to it by a country that doesn't really have a navy of it's own or why the only thing that russia can do is launch missiles at civilians or why russia still hasn't taken Bakhmut after months of trying . If you don't want to do that then you could explain why a guy with a dead TH-cam account from 2021 thinks that people won't know he's just another worthless paid Ork troll .
@@balaclavabob001 Of course, logic is completely wasted on you, but you are begging the question. You head is stuck so far up CNN's ass you may never see daylight. Things are not "going pretty bad" for Putin. His popularity rating is about 87% right now. That's higher than any US president in history. Maybe you would like to explain what you mean by "the Russian navy got its ass handed to it" because that has not happened even with the MI6 / US engineered attack on Sevastopol and Ukrop mines floating all over the Black Sea. Russia does not attack civilians or hide behind them as does the AFU, which is the sole reason Russian has not "taken" Bakhmut or Zaporizhzhia or Marinka, etc., yet. This area is now Russian territory and they are not going to give it up. Meanwhile, the civilians who elected to stay in Kherson are starving, freezing, and carrying water from the Denipro because the Zelensky cannot supply them, the AFU cannot even reposition its forces from Kherson to the north. Going to be a very interesting winter and I look forward to the day the RF takes off the gloves, shoots down the recon satellites, the P-8s, the P-3, the Brit U-2s, etc., and ends the US/NATO proxy war on Russia. You should send propane to Europe as they freeze their asses off and maybe, just maybe realize it was not in their interests to US vassals in this worldwide war to force everyone to use the massively inflated federal reserve notes as a world reserve currency. Of course you are unable to know facts or see reality, but Russia, China, India, and Iran are setting up their own exchange system, totally outside the Fed/IMF and the South American and African countries are very interested in joining them. The US, Canada, and US vassals in Europe stand alone. It gives me no delight at all and it is all a result of Zionist control of the US central government which is not and has not been a "federal" government ever since Lincoln's War on the States. So, Bobby Boy, I would say kiss my ass, but that would be impolite. May you grow a brain and figure out how to use it someday and may you realize that thing you are sucking is an appendage from Washington, District of Criminals.
From Navy Lookout July 6th 2021 MBDA announced today that the Type 45 destroyers will be enhanced with 24 Sea Ceptor missile cells. Here we consider the implications of this significant upgrade to the Royal Navy’s primary air defence platform. The Integrated Review published in March 2021 promised enhancements to the Sea Viper missile system, but the news that Type 45s will receive additional missiles is a big step forward and a welcome surprise. A new 24-missile Sea Ceptor silo will be added in front of the current 48-missile Sylver VLS silo (See speculative mockup above), increasing the overall missile capacity from 48 to 72. Not only does this raise overall missile numbers by 50%, but also offers the potential to increase the range and reach of the existing Sea Viper system.
The fitment of Sea Ceptor was tragically cancelled (put back indefinitely) leaving Type 45 very vulnerable to close in attack. The Sea Ceptor systems share 80% of parts with Sky Sabre which were prioritised instead for shipment to the Polish/Ukraine border.
In an ideal world, that space is used for its original intent, fitted for 16 extra Sylver A 70 or 16 MK 41 strike length cells. 6-8 of the 48 curren a 50 cells could quadpack sea ceptor, and the a70 cells could be used for FC/ASW or more Asters
@@jameswright2974 yeah same as America got shafted by farmers in Vietnam fall of saigon they dropped there m16s and ran fighting to climb on the ships pushing their helicopters in the sea so the communists couldn't get them
Russia is doing alright in Ukraine - controls over 20% The Ukraine territory...hardly a paper tiger lol What were the brits doing in Crimeia? Out on an imperialist trip? Lol they got a reality check....the Russians can and will fight back...best to get over your colonial mindset lol
@@johnnydiamondsmusic1673 Crimea, might be half way round the world in your eyes, but it's not far from the borders of EU and NATO nations. Maintaining the Black Sea's status as a global waterway is important.
@@dreikjapan4061 I had Lada, and it never betrayed me! Fires on on -50 fires on on +50c, crude, tough, going and undestructable xD If I could find now good Lada special 1500 I would buy it with no second thought, honestly. Or ВАЗ-2106 (VAZ-2106)
@@GloopSerious-nt9dv HAHAAH you had Lada ? Do you know that Lada's are Fiat 145 ? And if you are saying "it never betrayed me" you are fucking stupid lier. We had Lada's everywhere and they total UTTER TRASH. You drive it once a month and you have to fix it twice.
I disagree, its called leadership, telling your team what they did, that they did it well, and expressing appreciation. He might not be well trained in the art of speech making but he came across as sincere, if he hadn't the crew would have seen through him immediately.
It’s quite amazing that a destroyer could take a military plane down by the plane just getting to close to its radar system. Who needs weapons when you can accidentally take out your enemy.
@@henryatkinson1479 It's the fact that radar is extremely damaging to human cells. You should never be in the direct line of a radar system as it is well documented that it causes cancer. Being that close to a 45's radar is not immediately fatal, but the exposure will lead to a massively increased risk of cancer. There's a famous story about an Australian (?) port VTS where all of the operators in the control tower kept getting groin cancers, it turned out that they were directly in line with ships incoming radars, which produce non-ionising radiation. Those were commercial ships, a 45's radar is many, many levels above that- hence the warning.
Ну наши крымские Су-24М2 не такие уж и старинные ...2012 года! Они как раз носители четырёх сверхзвуковых маловысотных подарков - ПКР Х-31АД. Эти малышки как раз разрабатывались для поражения подобных фрегатов с расстояния в 160км ;)
I’m ex RAF…….Doing some number crunching using info from the internet Duncan could have launched 20 missiles and shot down all 17 aircraft within 60-90 seconds and the radar is so powerful it would fry aircraft electronics and sterilise the pilots at 2 miles. Lucky Russians
@@leonardhpls6 The SU-34 was carrying bombs and the 20 x SU-30 if they were carrying kh-31p missiles which have a claimed range of 110km (probably more). The type 45 missiles have a claimed 120km range (probably more) and the ships radar has a claimed range of 400km. They would have to launch 40+ missiles to succeed.
the Duncan would have smoked those fighters as that's its primary role, but in saying that, the amount of hate coming back at it would make have been a real worry. Its good no one blinked
@@Omar-df3uk Lol, ok. What range were they at in this instance, where the Russian fighters over 120km away or were they under 10 miles, it shouldn't be too hard for you to find out, they say it in the vid, maybe you should slow the video so your little brain can hear what they say? Also you do know that, just because a missile is fired from outside of 120km, that doesn't mean the air defence system wont engage it once it comes within that range to hit the ship, you moron. The whole design of the type 45 destroyer(the Duncan in case you didn't know), was air defence, so at those closes ranges, of course it would smoke those fighters, if you don't believe me, go read up on the insane capabilities of the air defence system used on those ships. Plus if you knew anything about modern tactics, especially tactics used by the Russians, IF they had wanted to try and sink the Duncan and start ww3, they wouldn't have used fighters, they would have prob used anti-ship missiles lunched from a Bastion-P unit. So going back to what i said, the Duncan would have smoked those fighters, but there would have been alot of hate coming back, SO ITS GOOD NO ONE BLINKED. Ya dumbass.
@@austineodhiambo1999 oh shut up ffs its clear as day what ever russia say about their fighters is horse shit have you not noticed they still dont have air superiority in ukraine? its been nearly 3 years.....
What was the HMS Duncan doing in the Black Sea? It's not 1856 anymore, the Crimean War is over. If someone tells you to meet them at Waterloo, they mean the underground station, not the battle.
@@failedguy1018 Crime is not Ukraine! UKRAINE IS NOT INDEPENDENT COUNTRY NOW! Its WESTERN VASSAL! ukraine IS PART RUSSIA occupied by WEST ! FIRST IN RUSSIAN IMPIRE, NEXT SOVIET UNION! CRIME WAS PUTTING out STATE OF RUSSIAN SOVIET FEDERATION REPUBLIK(РФСР) in 1954 by soviet leader Nikita Hrushov to state Ukranian Soviet Socialistic Repabrik(УССР) for selebrating aninivessery friendship russian and ukraine peoples! Without all rules!! Example, as ball getting out from left hand to right hand! Without Crimea people vote! Without all layer rules! Learn History! Soviet Union is broken- next Crimea back home to Russia - exUSSR(russian impire)! Ukraine is fake state building soviet communists! Western land of Ukraine is Stalin getting from Poland and other border land after WW2 in 1939-1945 ! USSR is broken- followed anticommunists trends- return this lands Poland etc!
@@czhaok their old outdates sams shot down a steathy f-117 in serbia,just try them and i can guarantee their outdated missiles which are subsonic as yours will do a marvelous job
@@taylort5672 a 20th century sate of the art overhyped tech taken out by a 19 th century weapon,the same way overhyped f-35 or 22 would be taken out only for you to start coming up with new excuses
@@mike_hunt4783 HAHAHA! British stopped the nazis?! HOW? Threatened the Nazis with a finger from the island? Escaped from Dunkirk and didn't stick out? When it became clear that the Russians would win the war, they swam across the La Manche in haste to be among the victors? Is that how you defeated the Nazis? What an arrogant islanders, the United States's puppets.
@@Fa1h999 uneducated, Dunkirk was the Frenchs fault, the soviets would have lost the war if the UK surrendered, as Germany would have had twice the airpower twice the manpower, and the biggest navy by miles the Soviets and the Americans would have no chance of survival! so get back to your history class.
The Duncan is a capable ship and she was'nt on her own. As part of Nato, other friendly eyes were watching everything and ready to pounce if she was attacked. Not that she would have needed any help because the captain had enough anti air missiles to take out all the Russian planes in the air.
It only took one Exocet missile flown from an ancient subsonic plane by the Argentine pilots to sink two navy frigates in the Falklands so let that be a timely reminder, in any case without US say so Britain can't do anything.
Alright, so you obviously don't know what actually happened. The Exocet missile was incredibly new. No country even the USA had the capability to defend against them via ship at that time. Phalanx was still in development. That was the first modern war, no one new what was going to happen, there was no experience in that type of warfare. UK also won a war, 4 thousand miles away, launched the furthest bombing raid in history, won against an army 4x there size, while having bad logistics.@@MC-bu6ez
no it wont if all those plane fire there anti ship missile at the same time there saturation attack would easily overwhelm the type 45 air defense system the type 45 only have 48 missiles those would have to intercept the missile fired and the aircraft that is firing them im not saying that an air raid that size would leave unharm duncan would probably shot a lot of there missile and even some planes down but its really a matter of not enough missle to go around and we dont live in a world where a single missile is guaranteed a hit
@@patthonsirilim5739 The Type 45 class has the best air defence in the world. 48 missiles aren't for intercept. Those are 2 different things. There are intercept missiles and SAM missiles. And they have many CIWS. Also they have the strongest radar, it has the potential to knock out a jet if it flies to close...
The Russian pilots will have been shitting themselves when they realised it was a type 45 destroyer - they would need over 50 at once to worry that one ship. Great training for the ships crew though.
Don't hold your breath... I remember in 1995 the Dutch begging for air power to save them and many thousands of Muslims from the Serbs at Srebrenica. They didn't get any support and were overrun and more than 8000 Muslims deported and most of them killed...
You heard the Commodore saying "very useful." Valuable experience gained. I'm sure the Russian gained a lot also. After the losses 1982 important lessons were also learned concerning the design and operation of these vessels.
Anyone would be naive to think they can enter the black sea without being in the crosshairs of several submarines, land / sea based anti ship missiles... And the rest. The fighters are only the defences you can see. Guaranteed they are being targeted by a lot more than that. It's the sheerest stupidity and arrogance to sail into the Black Sea and think you can win. Those sailors wouldn't stand a chance. So close to being cannon fodder. And yes, i'm British.
It's not even about submarines and the black sea Russian squadron. The fact is that the Crimea has a very powerful coastal defense, where the entire coast is studded with anti-ship missiles. and whoever enters the water area is immediately under the gun, the chances of survival are very small.
There's no need to enter Black Sea, to defeat Russia. Moreover, there's no need to open fire, to defeat Russia :) Russia is a parody for USSR, which was a much more powerful state. What happened to USSR? It just collapsed under it very own internal problems. So will Russia.
The mad thing about it is the ship would of downed the lot aswell aa destroy any incoming missiles at the same time! Very very powerful warship is the type 45!
@@andytyrrell5153 Depends, there is a reason why they said if the fighter jets get within 2miles they would shoot them down, at long/medium range those russian jets don't stand a chance. But the closer they get the more danger the ship is in. Plus's also depends on the type of Russian jets, most of Russia's jets are old apart from some of the new 5th generation which they mostly use to show off and trying to convince everyone we should be scared.
only 1 aircraft can send them to the bottom. that close the the land means that surface to surface and antiship missales are in range. dont wanna talk about ballistic missales.
Ты рассуждай про ракеты, а звездец придет как пришел к СССР - без всяких ракет. А этот корабль (условно говоря) тебе опять окорочков привезет, за которыми ты будешь в очереди давиться :)
@@МаринаМишина-ц2р Не, ну точно говорю про сало. Тебя прям таки тянет на что нибудь съестное. Ну не хочешь сала, могу выслать тобою вожделенных окорочков. Окорока будут качественные, без ГМО и "химии", при всем при этом Маде Ин Раша. Не бойся, в твою порцию Новичка не накапаем, ты же не Скрипаль и не Навальный.
we must send a couple of Russian frigates to the coast of England to ensure freedom of navigation on its shores. Why should democracy be only on the shores of Russia ? Let there be a democratic movement of different warships and off the coast of England . You can even make a salute over London in honor of the opening of navigation
@@bradywhelan3866 machine translation ..The flight range of the hypersonic anti-ship missile "Zircon" in new tests will more than double: it will have to hit the target at a distance of about a thousand kilometers. This is reported by TASS with reference to a source in the military-industrial complex. previous tests of the hypersonic missile took place in early October: the Zircon successfully hit a target at a distance of 450 kilometers. The flight speed reached Mach 8, the altitude-28 kilometers. At the same time, the launch was first shown on video, however, the video turned out to be short - the newest rocket instantly disappeared from view.
@@bradywhelan3866 You misunderstood the previous comment. Russia has hypersonic missiles "Zircon" and that is why the Americans are sweating, and you are among them.
I wonder how ready the ship was to actually engage the aircraft and how quickly it could do so. It was always just going to be posturing from the Russians of course.
I don't know if the crew of Duncan are acting so arrogant because they are on TV and don't wanna lose face or they actually believe themselves. "They had 17 aircraft, we've got 48 missiles, I think we're gonna win"... That's like saying, "I'm facing 17 enemies but I have a gun with a magazine of 48 bullets so I think I'm gonna win." If a single ship could defeat 17 airplanes that easily (4th or 5th gen is irrelevant) than you'd be proving aircraft carriers are a waste of money. Yet the US keeps building them, and you built a new one just a few years ago. This sort of arrogance and underestimating your enemy is how people lose winnable battles.
I suggest you do your research, that ship could track and launch missiles simultaneously and destroy all the planes around it. It’s possible the best air defence ship in the world.
for those chanting in awe of russia. the aircraft equipment types (dropkick, slotback, top plate) are all cold war. tl;dr they're 30+ year old garbage that russia dusted off for a 'display'. not only would they have lost. but the loss would have been both embarrassing and expensive.
the Russian navy is piss poor out of every country in the world more submarine disasters and half of there bloody fleet is still on diesel and as for the air force it is stuck in the 80s hand me downs the fact is the range of radar and the range of HMS Duncan's weapons systems would mean they wouldn't even get close to HMS Duncan. Russia resorts to sneaky cowardly nerve agent attacks because there capabilities suck ass all the commies have are nukes to make them a threat and even then they didn't even figure that out for themselves they stole it. The Russian military is a joke kind of like Russia as a whole only have to look at the country's infrastructure still stuck in the cold war era looking jank with f'd up roads not really a country to be afraid of.
@@happilystoned ah yes, propaganda and bias, best way to get fucked on the battlefield once you encounter your enemy "Underestimate your enemy and you have allready lost the war" - Art of War
But they have powerful radar right on the coast of Russian territory. The Russians probably picked up that there was a powerful radar on that ship and scrambled a large amount of planes to scare of the destroyer. All countries do this. It’s not naive they are just protecting there borders. Like Russia would get global condemnation if they parked a destroyer with powerful radar right off the coast of Edinburgh. Also I must say it is very British of us to applaud ourselves for doing nothing. Just told the Russians to stay back for their own safety, which they complied to do. Also, yeah that destroyer has a shit ton of missiles. But they have a shut ton of missiles on their wings plus they have flares and other countermeasures. The destroyer would sink. Maybe blow some planes up. But it would be a loss for us unfortunately.
As a Russian - nobody wants to die at some war. Your guys had a practice with a radar, Russian pilots had a practice how to attack a foreign ship in the Black Sea. Both can express bravada... I miss the days when we have been meeting the British sailors in St.Petersburg during the Russian NAVY day. Seen a couple of half dead drunk Britts naked on Nevsky prospect... Guys had fun. So it would be way more fun if the Russian pilots and British NAVY would play a football game and late get drunk together.
@@КалининЮрий-о6й Британия всегда была врагом для России, даже тогда когда сражались с гитлером ! Они после втрой мировой войны хотели напасть на Россию !
@@ДмитрийПанфёров-т6б в международной политике важно строить мосты, а не заборы. И всегда помните аксиому - у наций нет постоянных врагов или постоянных друзей. У наций есть интересы. Для государства Россия что выгоднее - забор или мост?
@@МаринаМишина-ц2р Марина, России наплевать - кто и что думает. Точно так же как и США наплевать кто там признал или не признал аннексию Техаса, Нью Мексико и Калифорнии. Весь нормальный мир понимает де-юре может быть и не РФ, но де-факто это РФ и Россия не отдаст Крым ни при каких условиях. И никто не собирается воевать с Россией за Крым, включая олигархов и их детей в Киеве и Лондоне.
HMS Hood was a WW1 battleship sunk by a WW2 battleship the Bismark. The Russian jets are Cold War era whilst the Royal Navy Destroyer is the most capable air defence warship in the world.
@@briant5685 Russia wouldn't even risk it, turkey alone would beat Russia in the black sea, never mind the rest of the NATO countries, plus's Romania has been working hard on a new middle system that can sink ships from very long range and scares the shit out of Russia. Backed and paid by the USA of course.
@@knowledge3563 exactly, lots of.bravado which is expected from the underfunded European Unions or UK military but in a shooting match it's not checkers it's chess. Leave the heavy lifting to the US
The amount wrong with this sentence is mind boggling. The Royal Navy didn't withdraw frigates from the Red Sea you melt. If what you say is true then how did they get their with no crew?? Both frigates were due to retire, only the second one was retired early as the crew was an issue. This happens from time to time.
So he's implying every single one of their missiles ought to be a one shot kill... I highly doubt that. Given this specific scenario I'd rather sit in an agile fighter jet maybe, just maybe having to defend 2-3 missiles than sitting in a huge ass boat moving slower than a sloth having to counter 17 attackers at the same time.
@@BoostyGeoff Just because I'm not buying into that captains british BS doesn't mean I'm not from the west too - I'm german btw so the weapons you are refering to are mine too :P Where did you get that BS 80% number from? Do you personally test ammunition for some NATO country? Again, I highly doubt that number - and even if so... The situation is a single ship on a foreign coastline. Do you really think the russians don't have the power to eliminate one single ship on their own turf? That's stupid - none of our NATO ships will survive alone against a foreign power on their own turf.
@@mayor7829 А кто то спрашивал мнение у предателей? Мнение зомбированных технологами промывания мозга англосаксов, никого не интересуют, пусть они варятся в своей каше. Не мешайте общаться людям.
" They have 17 planes, we have 48 missles" BUT! if they each fire two missiles then we wouldn't have enough missiles. Russian jets reguarly fire missiles in pairs when i see videos of them over Syria. Added to that, there was possibly a Kilo-class submarine in those waters too.
@Din Djarin Не, факаться ин зе асс это сугубо ваше - европейское. Мы пока еще убогие ретрограды и варвары в этом плане и предпочитаем женские вагины. Кстати, если верить Бивору, то мы по достоинству оценили 2 млн дойче ваджайнас, заметь это все в эпоху без голубых таблеток. Представляешь какая сейчас будет эрекция у русского солдата в эпоху Виагры и свободы мировых взаимоотношений по линии Россия - НАТО (которое не расширяется на восток ни на дюйм)
In a real world combat scenario, none of those aircraft would have got even a look at Duncan. In the same way that she'd likely have never set proper eyes on them either.
@@EnglishScripter: I believe you misunderstood what he wrote. I believe he is speaking of actually physically seeing each other with their eyes, not talking about seeing each other on radar.
@Matty UK ill start by stating your historical credibility. I'll be blunt, you are the furthest away from being saints. Not the Turks or the Germans level, but you aren't far. Are you sure it's not the other way around dear NATO member? All the western nations under one umbrella targeting Russia, what's that for? After the fall of the Soviet Union you f*cked them up. Your own historians, tacticians, geopolitical analyzers wanted to separate Russia into 3 states so it could be easier manipulated. We know the trend, you gave half Cyprus to the Turks. Thankfully history can give us the information we need to analyze situations like these.
Do us a favour and educate yourself 1. Russia always breaches British airspace 2. They were travelling in an international strait In conclusion shut the fuck up
The point is this is off Crimea and the uk views this as Ukraine. I believe this ship was visiting Odessa to show our support and deliberate crossed into Ukrainian crimea water
@@Свевладовић no one has ever provoked the Russians. The Russians are committing genocide in a free and democratic country and they are threatening NATO for no reason. NATO is an entirely defensive alliance that will never attack anyone until its attacked itself. They are only getting ready in case all Russians have a death wish.
Can you blame them, britain sending warships to their backyard. you just read the british press when the russians send a couple ships through the english channel they throw a hissyfit and the dumb mps go crying to the pm in parliament. fundamentally threatening any country with a show of might is an aggressive move. and it doesn't create stability.
@@---cf9bj when the russians send their fleet to the channel, its noted in the papers and the navy sends a frigate. In this case, one ship is in international waters and they send planes to harass it, and its in an area Russia took by force illegally. There's no comparison.
@@internetenjoyer1044 First of all, russian ships also pass through international waters when going through the english channel. it doesn't stop the media hysteria and war hawk mps from having a tantrum over it. secondly we send the same warning messages to them as they do to us. we scramble jets and send warships to ward them off. Finally, you need to do your research pal because the people of crimea are first of all native russians and secondly they voted in an overwhelming majority to RE-Join the russian federation, there was nothing forceful about it. in fact it was the definition of democracy, the people of crimea chose to be russian.
@@---cf9bj Yes, Russia is allowed to pass through the channel. The point is that, aside from tabloids making a fuss (and they should, it's deliberate provocation, unlike one ship) and a small number of ships and planes set to watch them, nothing happens. Contrast that with sending 17 planes to fly dangerously close to one ship in an intimidation attempt. Unlike Russia, Britain respects the right of travel in international waters. Regarding the referendum in Ukraine, it was clearly illegal and has no founding, but I don't want to focus on that. All I'm saying is that there's no parallel between the British response to Russia sending it's fleet to the English channel and the Russian response
@@---cf9bj Russia has actively entered the territory of MANY NATO states. Also they happen to currently commit genocide in the free and democratic country of Ukraine. They really shouldnt be surprised that NATO is getting ready in case Russia has a death wish ;)
what people on here forget and the armchair Admirals forget to that the Type 45 destroyer Radar can track up to 1000 objects and they were operating in International waters as a Blue Water Navy following their commitment to NATO and there is equipment on that ship that is top secret and as it is open waters i am pretty sure that HMS Duncan could handle 17 aircraft not forgetting that there would be other ships operating in the same waters that would lend a hand
The Sampson radar picked the jets up and locked on before they even took off, all 17 jets would be destroyed by the sea viper missiles before they got in range to sink the Duncan!
To be fair in a war situation they wouldn’t have let them get close, they’d have fired as soon as they saw them on radar, but because it’s not war time they don’t want to spark an international conflict. What would you do in this situation?
@@googleuser4268 and that would spark an international conflict involving many powerful countries, choosing to attack is a very serious decision that no personal on any nations vessal would green light unless absolutely necessary
@@googleuser4268 no. Not with that ships many radars lol it can see and track everything,it's crazy how powerful it's systems are. The missile would be shot down before it got close lol
One Argie ancient sky hawk fighter bomber armed with WW1 iron bombs takes out British Destroyer Laugh. 48 missiles, what a laugh the Russians could take the rust bucket out without the planes leaving Russian territory.
@@charlesfrogg1 it's well documented the fire control systems on the untested missile defence system couldn't handle low flying aircraft. The system on the T45 has been proven to manage with drone missiles. So maybe make your comments more relevant next time your desperately clawing for attention?
@Brit Mk 2 English impudence and lack of intelligence-is this the second happiness ? Anti-ship missiles from the island of Crimea at a speed of 2 km per second sew any floating suitcase in a couple of minutes . Planes don't need to take off ..
How? Your military has run out of equipment and ammunition. You have a dinosaur of an aircraft carrier in dry dock and the Moscova has been sunk. You're Russian, so I'm probably replying to a dead man.
Remember the fate of HMS Broadsword (F88) , ,Coventry (D118) and HMS Sheffield (D80) The admiralty did not expect these ships to sink but sink they did
Converted from nonnmilitary designs with poor damage control and shortened hulls, lacking the Sea Wolf air defence systems to save money. The Type 45 is a dedicated air defence destroyer with multiple ways to down those planes or stop their weapons, from Aster 30 and Aster 15 to the CIWS, or electronic measures. It would take a very large air attack to overwhelm her defences.
@@TheBritishEmpire920 yeah makes scense all right. Some mighty fire power required to protect the stock piles of Earl gray stashed below deck. Wouldn't want those Russians coming and spoiling tea time with their vodka and babushkas. I would personally use a diamond item with sharpness 3 and a few stacks of tnt.
@@ВиталийВикторович-э1н у кого туалет, а не гальюн, пол, а не палуба - те плавают и не различают что есть судно (подсказываю - сугубо гражданское плавсредство), а что есть корабль...
Aye, he looks a wee bit less cocksure about that. I mean, these are formidable ships and the world’s most powerful air defence destroyers, but send enough aircraft (“targets”) and that still leaves their anti-ship missiles - presumably launched prior to their own immolation-by-suicide mission - to counteract. My guess is that at least one, maybe more, gets through to cause perhaps fatal damage. HMS Duncan has 17 targets, plus however many missiles might theoretically be launched, to contend with; they’ve just got HMS Duncan to defeat. This is why it’s a foolish admiral who sends a ship unescorted into the littoral zone of a major power, and is also why in wartime a flotilla - possibly with carrier-based air cover in tow and at least one fast attack submarine on fleet protection duties - would likely be deployed instead. Layers upon layers of air defence because one ship operating alone is a sitting duck no matter how powerful she happens to be.
That's a pretty dumb things for the russians to do. The ship was no threat to Crimea at the time and there was nothing to gain from this pointless posturing. On the other hand it offered intel for nato forces on scramble times, aircraft types and numbers, what ordnance would be carried, EW data, radar profile data and who knows what else. With rapid fire VLS you shoot down 17 planes in a minute. On the other hand, even with a probability of intercept of 99%, which is doubtful, you can't afford to get hit even once. So standard doctrine is to allocate two missiles per incoming threat, or at least it was not too long ago. 48 missiles really do go very quickly.
![[ TEASER ] เงาะป่า - วงL.กฮ. | TMG RECORD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M4ObdFfcPww/mqdefault.jpg)
the fact that they where detecting them when they where where practically taking off....... yeah these ships are scary.
Were they? That could have been information from another source.
@@allybally0021 it is reported that the Sampson and S1850M radars that the HMS Duncan are equipped with have a 400km/250mile range.
The video states that the HMS Duncan was 30miles off the coast of Crimea which was the direction of where the jets came from. So you could say that HMS Duncan had them on radar as soon as they took off and climbed to an altitude that could seen by the radars.
The Russian pilots would have known they were on radar as well as their avionics would have detected it and warned them if they were being pinged or targeted/locked up by other radars.
Those MIGs could have avoided radar detection by staying really low to the ground but i don't think the kremlin and Crimean citizens would appreciate 17 jets almost going supersonic at tree level fly over their heads.
Ive heard a flight of four or five F-15s fly overhead pretty low and slow and even those were pretty loud. I wouldnt want even one of them to go supersonic at tree level right above me
@@Rose.Of.Hizaki Hi I appreciate your thoughts. I think it all depends on the radar lobes, altitude and terrain when they would be acquired. Maybe they were picked-up as soon as they took-off but I suspect there are supplementary sources of this information.
The idea of low altitude flights are not that remarkable though. Military jets regularly follow terrain at 250ft agl (or much lower in truth) and whilst noisy it is nothing new. They would not need to be supersonic or anything near it. Most are circa 450knots on dry thrust.
@@allybally0021 Well, its all speculation but im sure the MoD as well as the captain and navigators on board the ship knew that the airfield was there and it would be easy to correlate between the location of the airfield on the map and where the dots suddenly appeared on the radar - although they could have also come from a different airfield but nobody knows apart from the ships crew or maybe the film crew. Since it tv shows like these often exaggerate tensions because thats what brings in the views. The same way people tune in to Kitchen Nightmares with Gordon Ramsey.
While i did say that the radar onboard the Duncan has pretty long range. I guess for most of us, that is theoretical as terrain and tall buildings can mess with the actual distance.
----
even if not supersonic. Jets are still loud and depending on the country youre from. There are rules or laws in place that restrict jets from going too fast due to the noise especially if the airfield is located near to a heavily populated area or the jets need to fly over populated areas to get where they need to go.
At least here n the UK there are altitude and distance requirements that restrict jets from going supersonic over heavily populated areas unless it was an emergency like the Jets needed to go and intercept something -- and sonic booms are LOUD and can be heard for absolutely miles. UK airspace is limited to 250knots under 10000ft.
17 jets flying super low to the ground still isnt a fun experience. At least for the people on the ground.
You can make the argument of an airshow but i dont think the organisers would let 17 jets buzz the spectators at tree level.
Very likely. Probably while they were still on the ground.
The Type 45 is such a wicked ship. I think the Russians were actually seeing how many targets the warship could track/engage at once. I don't think they liked the answer they got.
“We have you 17 to 1.”
“I like those odds”
2 missiles for each plane isnt enough is it?
SNP Alba forever dw about it man
But only if you can get them all before just one gets you
@Brit Mk 2 only takes 1 missile per pirate, and there will be no one to provoke.
@@ns7353 That's too much
In an actual attack the attacking aircraft don't usually stick around. As soon as they were in range they would pop off all of their missiles and run for home
They got picked up as they were taking off. They wouldn't have got anywhere near to launching any missile before they were shot down.
@@michaelcraig8860 Dream on, Russians jets would have launched sea skimming anti ship long missiles from 50 to 100km (multiple launches of missiles) , at least dozen missiles would have hit the RAN ship ,the rest taken out by the ship's anti missile systems.
@@amuxpatch2798 lol, cope russia is a paper tiger
@@pymathus2283 shows what weakness? the only weakness being shown is Russia in Ukraine
@@isziahs5951 What has Ukraine got to do with this video???
In early spring in the mid 70's HMS Bacchante sailed in complete radio and radar silence around the North Cape, and as far as the White Sea. It was so cold the sea began freezing around the ship, and I had to keep the Seacat launcher running to keep the hydraulic oil warm, or at least not so cold that the breaker tripped. The reason the crew was given was that the Russians had been hassling our trawlers in the area. I'm not convinced of that! We reached the White Sea undetected (probably probing defences was our real reason). At which point we could have returned undetected. However there is no point going there and not leaving a calling card. We turned on the navigation radar for just one revolution, and within 15 minutes there were planes and ships everywhere! Exciting times!
Heard the launches had problems in the Falklands. Guessing that could've been a result of cold weather aswell
Foolish in hindsight to give them a free radar ping. Now they know the frequency
@@seanbrewer2703 on the contrary, they know all our frequencies, as we know there's. The whole point was to give them the heads up we had got there undetected
@@seanbrewer2703just no...
"They have 17 aircraft, we have 48 missiles. I think we're gonna win".
Too right!
Not a single missile can hit the jets.
@@FXT130 Tell that to the Argentines. And with a type 42, not a 45.
@@FXT130every missile will hit the jets, they travel at Mach 4.5
@@liammoy5911 Russia is not Argentina duffer. They were poorly equiped but still they able to sink one British Ship.
@@obvious-troll Speed is not everything too hit a jet. It is not a stationary object and every jets also carry minimum 6-8 missile. If it so easy to attack Russia than war monger country like Britain will never miss that opportunity.
Most of these airplanes now serve as a keychain.
I actually have a bracelet made out of Sukhoi 27
Thay have plenty titanium parts for a clkey chain the west would love to have those metals for they spy plane u2
@@SAGAWISIW30 u2? What do you mean? We haven't used a u2 in decades, they're completed outdated (well if you're not Russian that is lol)
@@Tom_Cruise_Missile Well, actually that's not true. The U-2 is still in service with the 9th Recon wing and the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing. It's true the US needed titanium for the SR-71, which they acquired from the Soviet Union to make 'pizza ovens' lol
There’s a reason nato like to have a type 45 with all fleet deployments.
type 45 are useless agaisnt other ships
@doge koko Hence why other ships are there too ! The Type 45 protects the fleet from air attack ! Wake up.
@@dogekoko9865 It's almost like 1 ship isnt supposed to do everything because theyre in fleets with multiple other ships that each have their own specialised purpose
@Iain Campbell type 45s have slow moving non stealthy missle and there are only 8 of them mean while russian ships have mach 4 kitchen missles that penetrate air defences easily
@@ynwa3476 i know i specified that it is not good against anti ships and are only a anti air assest
Incredible professionalism. I live in Falmouth now with its illustrious naval history of heroes. Here I see more heroes & a technological masterpiece
Yeah our nosy heroes 30 miles into hostile country a long journey from. Home 3000 kilometers away. What a waste of British pounds... they could spent billions for war but struggling to house our homeless brits🤑🤑🤑
@@SAGAWISIW30 That could be achieved by curtailing the amount of immigrants flooding into our country. Great Britain has always had a proud maritime history & I for one deeply respect those who are our armed forces. We're it not for the likes of my dad who fought in WW2 you would not have been in the position to make your disrespectful comment.
@@dlmdee what are you going on about?
@@dlmdee Do you honestly believe we leave our country unprotected? I guess you've never played poker for money. Probably just a tubby middle aged guy with testicles the size of peanuts. My Dad fought in WW2 in the battle of El Alamein. My first cousin fought for our country. I've friends in the Royal Navy. Our shores are not undefended you total muppet
@@dlmdee For your further information it's called a 'Projection of Force'. We stopped projecting around the time of the Nazi & being timid like you our country nearly was bombed into the ground. We have an elite navy. We for instance still prevent piracy & slavery. In my block of apartments lives a a Royal Marine veteran. I'm so proud of this man & anything he needs I will make sure it happens for him. Instead of being a wimp ensure that through appropriate voting we maintain a strong armed forces. An example is the so called Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank which is just the upgrade of the Challenger 2. We need a new MBT. I could go on but I doubt you would comprehend
Gta online in one vid
What a young and professional crew male and female onwards and upwards God bless you
Indeed. Whether they should've been put in such a situation is another matter.
God bless the invaders lol....what were the Brits doing venturing in Crimeia?
@@ST-yv2lv They didn't. Cope harder Ivan. Crimea is Ukranian territory too. Overdose on the copium, and seethe
@@ST-yv2lv Putin is a war criminal
0:30 Funnily the shout after the BBC reporter explains it is for another plane was for a surface ship radar. Top Plate is the radar fitted to Russian warships, Slotback is the radar fitted to the SU-27 Flanker and Dropkick is the radar fitted to the SU-24.
It's weird watching this in September of 2022 and knowing that most of those russian pilots are probably dead now and that russia was always a paper tiger .
lmao i was just thinking this, what makes it funnier is all of the comments saying that russia is a deadly force
Some of the comments are hilarious now. Burnt tanks, smashed aircraft, dead conscripts and sunken ships tell the real story of Russia’s modern military. When they started pulling out the Moisin-Nagants and 1960’s tanks you almost started feeling sorry for the stupid idiots over there still saying “yes vladi, at once” and not standing up for themselves and turning on the leadership. Ah well, war never changes.
Dead? Since 2018? Hardly. They were all getting practice for sinking Her Majesty's Ships that are foolishly sent into the Black Sea. Regardless of all the agreements that the Black Sea is open waters, the fact remains that the Black Sea is a Russian pond. They control every inch of it and could easily sink every surface ship of the Royal Navy and the US Navy in about an hour and a half. The hypersonic missiles Putin introduced to the world in 2018 are indeed a game changer. All those carrier battle groups are mere defenseless targets for Russia if the west becomes stupid enough to launch on Russia. By the way, only Russia has actual air defenses rather than over-priced junk such as "Patriot" missiles that are simply a vehicle for transferring masses of currency from the taxpayer to Raytheon, Lockheed, Grumman, etc. None of the US "wonder weapons" are effective in combat as witness how things are going for the US/NATO in Ukraine. If Russia decides to fight like the US fights, i.e., flatten cities full of civilians and then send in the infantry, the Special Military Operation in Ukraine would end in about one day.
@@johnbrooks7144 Wow , dude. That's the most bullshit , cringe/cope propaganda I've ever seen in a reply . Things must be going really badly for putin right now ,huh? Maybe you'd like to explain how the russian navy got it's ass handed to it by a country that doesn't really have a navy of it's own or why the only thing that russia can do is launch missiles at civilians or why russia still hasn't taken Bakhmut after months of trying . If you don't want to do that then you could explain why a guy with a dead TH-cam account from 2021 thinks that people won't know he's just another worthless paid Ork troll .
@@balaclavabob001 Of course, logic is completely wasted on you, but you are begging the question. You head is stuck so far up CNN's ass you may never see daylight. Things are not "going pretty bad" for Putin. His popularity rating is about 87% right now. That's higher than any US president in history. Maybe you would like to explain what you mean by "the Russian navy got its ass handed to it" because that has not happened even with the MI6 / US engineered attack on Sevastopol and Ukrop mines floating all over the Black Sea. Russia does not attack civilians or hide behind them as does the AFU, which is the sole reason Russian has not "taken" Bakhmut or Zaporizhzhia or Marinka, etc., yet. This area is now Russian territory and they are not going to give it up. Meanwhile, the civilians who elected to stay in Kherson are starving, freezing, and carrying water from the Denipro because the Zelensky cannot supply them, the AFU cannot even reposition its forces from Kherson to the north. Going to be a very interesting winter and I look forward to the day the RF takes off the gloves, shoots down the recon satellites, the P-8s, the P-3, the Brit U-2s, etc., and ends the US/NATO proxy war on Russia.
You should send propane to Europe as they freeze their asses off and maybe, just maybe realize it was not in their interests to US vassals in this worldwide war to force everyone to use the massively inflated federal reserve notes as a world reserve currency. Of course you are unable to know facts or see reality, but Russia, China, India, and Iran are setting up their own exchange system, totally outside the Fed/IMF and the South American and African countries are very interested in joining them.
The US, Canada, and US vassals in Europe stand alone. It gives me no delight at all and it is all a result of Zionist control of the US central government which is not and has not been a "federal" government ever since Lincoln's War on the States. So, Bobby Boy, I would say kiss my ass, but that would be impolite. May you grow a brain and figure out how to use it someday and may you realize that thing you are sucking is an appendage from Washington, District of Criminals.
I love the British military commanders, it's like nothings a big deal to them
The Commanders comments.. spot on leadership.
Thanks for the air show Vladimir.
в следующий раз памерсов по больше возмите
этот
Theyll have to wait a few months now until theyve saved up the money to buy fuel and repairs for that many planes.
Vintage* airshow 😂
the uk crew had shitted their pants, look at the fear in their eyes
You can easily tell the sukhoi with its elevated cockpit. Like a MiG
From Navy Lookout July 6th 2021
MBDA announced today that the Type 45 destroyers will be enhanced with 24 Sea Ceptor missile cells. Here we consider the implications of this significant upgrade to the Royal Navy’s primary air defence platform.
The Integrated Review published in March 2021 promised enhancements to the Sea Viper missile system, but the news that Type 45s will receive additional missiles is a big step forward and a welcome surprise. A new 24-missile Sea Ceptor silo will be added in front of the current 48-missile Sylver VLS silo (See speculative mockup above), increasing the overall missile capacity from 48 to 72. Not only does this raise overall missile numbers by 50%, but also offers the potential to increase the range and reach of the existing Sea Viper system.
The fitment of Sea Ceptor was tragically cancelled (put back indefinitely) leaving Type 45 very vulnerable to close in attack. The Sea Ceptor systems share 80% of parts with Sky Sabre which were prioritised instead for shipment to the Polish/Ukraine border.
@@LondonSteveLee The all important underground wealth in the East of Ukraine.
In an ideal world, that space is used for its original intent, fitted for 16 extra Sylver A 70 or 16 MK 41 strike length cells. 6-8 of the 48 curren a 50 cells could quadpack sea ceptor, and the a70 cells could be used for FC/ASW or more Asters
Never underestimate your enemy. Presume they know everything
Uk shafted by taliban wearing sandals driving motorcycles
@@jameswright2974 You forget what happened to Russia in Afghanistan.
@@RE4PER or right now in ukraine hahahaha
@@jameswright2974 yeah same as America got shafted by farmers in Vietnam fall of saigon they dropped there m16s and ran fighting to climb on the ships pushing their helicopters in the sea so the communists couldn't get them
Russia is doing alright in Ukraine - controls over 20% The Ukraine territory...hardly a paper tiger lol
What were the brits doing in Crimeia? Out on an imperialist trip? Lol they got a reality check....the Russians can and will fight back...best to get over your colonial mindset lol
The Brits love their Radar!
Johnny Diamonds Music bro it’s international waters
We did invent it 😂
Hissam Ullah training exercises, counter piracy, protection etc
Josh Jwillway I know that’s why this is great so British hahahah
@@johnnydiamondsmusic1673 Crimea, might be half way round the world in your eyes, but it's not far from the borders of EU and NATO nations. Maintaining the Black Sea's status as a global waterway is important.
I'm so happy the british navy honoured me by naming their ship after me.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Duncan,_1st_Viscount_Duncan
In Australia we have song titled “ I love to have a beer with Duncan, coz Duncan’s mate!”
Cheers Duncan from SouthAustralia
@@martinmartinshaw2 happy new year Martin! Cheers!
Wow flying Ladas. Impressive.
Whaddaya fins know, you are traumatized by Russians for centuries and you will be for centuries to be...
try challenge these "ladas" and you will see the ending credits very soon hahaha
@@dreikjapan4061 I had Lada, and it never betrayed me! Fires on on -50 fires on on +50c, crude, tough, going and undestructable xD If I could find now good Lada special 1500 I would buy it with no second thought, honestly. Or ВАЗ-2106 (VAZ-2106)
Could you be so kind to show us some cars from Finland? xD
@@GloopSerious-nt9dv HAHAAH you had Lada ? Do you know that Lada's are Fiat 145 ? And if you are saying "it never betrayed me" you are fucking stupid lier. We had Lada's everywhere and they total UTTER TRASH. You drive it once a month and you have to fix it twice.
when the CO is giving his speech he sounds like a primary school teacher after you solve a hard maths question 🤣🤣
I disagree, its called leadership, telling your team what they did, that they did it well, and expressing appreciation. He might not be well trained in the art of speech making but he came across as sincere, if he hadn't the crew would have seen through him immediately.
@@tango6nf477 Ye it was a joke.
It’s quite amazing that a destroyer could take a military plane down by the plane just getting to close to its radar system. Who needs weapons when you can accidentally take out your enemy.
Woops, sorry comrade.....or am I? 😄
Except that seems to be a total lie, as in this video the aircraft were close enough to film from the deck.
Close but no close enough, otherwise they would have been bantha fodda.
@@henryatkinson1479 It's the fact that radar is extremely damaging to human cells. You should never be in the direct line of a radar system as it is well documented that it causes cancer. Being that close to a 45's radar is not immediately fatal, but the exposure will lead to a massively increased risk of cancer. There's a famous story about an Australian (?) port VTS where all of the operators in the control tower kept getting groin cancers, it turned out that they were directly in line with ships incoming radars, which produce non-ionising radiation. Those were commercial ships, a 45's radar is many, many levels above that- hence the warning.
Their radar is like the weapon of James bond oo7😇
Nice of Russia to send its vintage Aircraft collection to welcome Duncan.
Axios .king Probably not, the ships only came into active service in 2013
Lol those jets are far superior to anything the British have
Ну наши крымские Су-24М2 не такие уж и старинные ...2012 года!
Они как раз носители четырёх сверхзвуковых маловысотных подарков - ПКР Х-31АД.
Эти малышки как раз разрабатывались для поражения подобных фрегатов с расстояния в 160км ;)
@@pimppac69 we have more then enough nuclear weapons to blow you country to the afterlife tho
@@pimppac69 Lol no there not they look like old jets we currently fly the euro fighter a very capable jet.
Just me or russia and the UK having a bit of a fight where it's like HOLD ME BACK HOLD ME BACK
Theres no need in planes at 30 miles... This is only show.
Watch latest incident in the news HMS Defender
Well neither Britain or Russia wants an international incident and wars are expensive
@@cmdrgarbage1895 welp you were wrong
@@dizzyWLRD No i'm not, nobody wants an international incident, still.
I’m ex RAF…….Doing some number crunching using info from the internet Duncan could have launched 20 missiles and shot down all 17 aircraft within 60-90 seconds and the radar is so powerful it would fry aircraft electronics and sterilise the pilots at 2 miles. Lucky Russians
How far out could the jets engage the ship ?
@@leonardhpls6 The SU-34 was carrying bombs and the 20 x SU-30 if they were carrying kh-31p missiles which have a claimed range of 110km (probably more). The type 45 missiles have a claimed 120km range (probably more) and the ships radar has a claimed range of 400km. They would have to launch 40+ missiles to succeed.
@user-el1rx3lu4q and then the missile would be targeted
The smile on the Commodores face speaks volumes.
"30 miles off the coast"..."the crew need to find out why the jets are here".........................
the Duncan would have smoked those fighters as that's its primary role, but in saying that, the amount of hate coming back at it would make have been a real worry. Its good no one blinked
It would have been a massacre. Duncan had those jets locked onto before those jets even knew it
Are you dumb? If the Russians wanted to do harm they would fire anti ship missiles outside Duncan’s Air defense range which is about 120Km(Aster30)
@@Omar-df3uk Lol, ok. What range were they at in this instance, where the Russian fighters over 120km away or were they under 10 miles, it shouldn't be too hard for you to find out, they say it in the vid, maybe you should slow the video so your little brain can hear what they say? Also you do know that, just because a missile is fired from outside of 120km, that doesn't mean the air defence system wont engage it once it comes within that range to hit the ship, you moron. The whole design of the type 45 destroyer(the Duncan in case you didn't know), was air defence, so at those closes ranges, of course it would smoke those fighters, if you don't believe me, go read up on the insane capabilities of the air defence system used on those ships. Plus if you knew anything about modern tactics, especially tactics used by the Russians, IF they had wanted to try and sink the Duncan and start ww3, they wouldn't have used fighters, they would have prob used anti-ship missiles lunched from a Bastion-P unit. So going back to what i said, the Duncan would have smoked those fighters, but there would have been alot of hate coming back, SO ITS GOOD NO ONE BLINKED. Ya dumbass.
@@lolagyable I can't understand your English read my comment and try again
@@lolagyable You're so brain dead the whole point is the Russian jets are that close because its a show of force not an actual battle dumb ass
in a real war the jets can all be engaged at the same time by that class
Yeah, not many ships can do that.
And the plane will fire all at u at same time or u thing the plane can't see the ship too ?
@@ChukwuebukaNdaji if she sees the jets first their dead if they see her first most if not all their missiles will be intercepted
The jets too can engage at the same time so what's your point?
@@austineodhiambo1999 oh shut up ffs its clear as day what ever russia say about their fighters is horse shit have you not noticed they still dont have air superiority in ukraine? its been nearly 3 years.....
What was the HMS Duncan doing in the Black Sea? It's not 1856 anymore, the Crimean War is over. If someone tells you to meet them at Waterloo, they mean the underground station, not the battle.
gitana082 In 2014 russia annexed crimea from Ukrane.
Hms d
Hms duncan was probobly on a reconnasince mission.
Protecting Romania a NATO ally, where Duncan sometime is stationed, along with a squadron of RAF Typhoon in Constanta, Romania.
hmmm Crimea and Waterloo ???????????? i dont get it
Waterloo is in Belgium you muppet.
@@failedguy1018 Crime is not Ukraine! UKRAINE IS NOT INDEPENDENT COUNTRY NOW! Its WESTERN VASSAL! ukraine IS PART RUSSIA occupied by WEST ! FIRST IN RUSSIAN IMPIRE, NEXT SOVIET UNION! CRIME WAS PUTTING out STATE OF RUSSIAN SOVIET FEDERATION REPUBLIK(РФСР) in 1954 by soviet leader Nikita Hrushov to state Ukranian Soviet Socialistic Repabrik(УССР) for selebrating aninivessery friendship russian and ukraine peoples! Without all rules!! Example, as ball getting out from left hand to right hand! Without Crimea people vote! Without all layer rules! Learn History! Soviet Union is broken- next Crimea back home to Russia - exUSSR(russian impire)! Ukraine is fake state building soviet communists! Western land of Ukraine is Stalin getting from Poland and other border land after WW2 in 1939-1945 ! USSR is broken- followed anticommunists trends- return this lands Poland etc!
It's just a game, if they was about to take down this ship they would send anti ship missile not the jets since Russians are not kamikadzes.
I think you heavily over estimate Russia. They have a lot of old, outdated tech. We know exactly what they do have, not what they claim to have.
@@czhaok their old outdates sams shot down a steathy f-117 in serbia,just try them and i can guarantee their outdated missiles which are subsonic as yours will do a marvelous job
@@briant5685 Jeez, going back to 1 plane getting downed a lot of years ago to make a very outdated point
@@taylort5672 a 20th century sate of the art overhyped tech taken out by a 19 th century weapon,the same way overhyped f-35 or 22 would be taken out only for you to start coming up with new excuses
@@taylort5672 britbonger coping 🤣
Don't mess with Duncan .you got know idea how powerful this ship is.
The UK daring class has the most advanced Ariel defensive systems in the world
In your dreams
@@duurnamets9678 your mum was😘😘😘😘
LoL
@@duurnamets9678 You got wrecked 🤣
Duur 😂😜🤣✌️🇬🇧
Brits ship close to russian Border
Russian: send 17 jets for a warning
Captain:" I think it was a challenge for russia"
@SNP Alba forever fuck my eyes! British people saying me what is this land! We are all remember what british empire did around the globe.
@@Fa1h999 yes, stopped the nazis from taking over the world?
@@mike_hunt4783 HAHAHA! British stopped the nazis?! HOW? Threatened the Nazis with a finger from the island? Escaped from Dunkirk and didn't stick out?
When it became clear that the Russians would win the war, they swam across the La Manche in haste to be among the victors?
Is that how you defeated the Nazis?
What an arrogant islanders, the United States's puppets.
@@Fa1h999 uneducated, Dunkirk was the Frenchs fault, the soviets would have lost the war if the UK surrendered, as Germany would have had twice the airpower twice the manpower, and the biggest navy by miles the Soviets and the Americans would have no chance of survival! so get back to your history class.
вызов был 1941-45год,когда мы ПОБЕДИЛИ всю европу!!!!!!
The Duncan is a capable ship and she was'nt on her own. As part of Nato, other friendly eyes were watching everything and ready to pounce if she was attacked. Not that she would have needed any help because the captain had enough anti air missiles to take out all the Russian planes in the air.
It only took one Exocet missile flown from an ancient subsonic plane by the Argentine pilots to sink two navy frigates in the Falklands so let that be a timely reminder, in any case without US say so Britain can't do anything.
@@MC-bu6ez and who won in the end? and how long did that take and all so that was 1982 a lot has changed from then and warships are much better.
Alright, so you obviously don't know what actually happened. The Exocet missile was incredibly new. No country even the USA had the capability to defend against them via ship at that time. Phalanx was still in development. That was the first modern war, no one new what was going to happen, there was no experience in that type of warfare. UK also won a war, 4 thousand miles away, launched the furthest bombing raid in history, won against an army 4x there size, while having bad logistics.@@MC-bu6ez
Lol you know a war between NATO and Russia will end right.. don't be a clown no one wins
@@MC-bu6ezWhat a moronic take. How could you compare this absolute pinnacle of warfare to the Falklands? Idiot
I don't know if anyone noticed, but one of the guys in the back was playing Galaga.
Type 45 could more than hold its own against his these jets
no it wont if all those plane fire there anti ship missile at the same time there saturation attack would easily overwhelm the type 45 air defense system the type 45 only have 48 missiles those would have to intercept the missile fired and the aircraft that is firing them im not saying that an air raid that size would leave unharm duncan would probably shot a lot of there missile and even some planes down but its really a matter of not enough missle to go around and we dont live in a world where a single missile is guaranteed a hit
@@patthonsirilim5739 The Type 45 class has the best air defence in the world. 48 missiles aren't for intercept. Those are 2 different things. There are intercept missiles and SAM missiles. And they have many CIWS. Also they have the strongest radar, it has the potential to knock out a jet if it flies to close...
@@sweetpotato3590 it's the best in the world in UK okay mate
@@briant5685 Nah the Type 45 destroyer is actually the best air defence destroyers in the world
The Russian pilots will have been shitting themselves when they realised it was a type 45 destroyer - they would need over 50 at once to worry that one ship.
Great training for the ships crew though.
You enter another country's territory and then wonder why are planes around you. Insane.
Crimea doesn't legally belong to Russia
@@ali_kazmi acording history and their law, YES it is!
@@parrot2066 Russian law isn't world law, and it certainly isn't the international law of open waters
@@noodles169 Say that when they will launch hypersonic nukes. Remember about law of international waters. Close to Russia, not close to UK. STAY HOME!
@@ali_kazmi by which legislation?
Although the Type 45 could handle this itself, you bet NATO jets were ready to swarm ontop of Duncan for support if anything went down.
Don't hold your breath... I remember in 1995 the Dutch begging for air power to save them and many thousands of Muslims from the Serbs at Srebrenica. They didn't get any support and were overrun and more than 8000 Muslims deported and most of them killed...
@@pecheur1951ain't nobody helping Muslims, behave
Damn the entire Russian airforce showed up
lmfao
good one
@@Cunny838 Thank you kindly sir
@@InTeRiiTuS I chuckled, good one
You could tell by the smoke , but they left their high flying tank turrets behind
You heard the Commodore saying "very useful." Valuable experience gained. I'm sure the Russian gained a lot also. After the losses 1982 important lessons were also learned concerning the design and operation of these vessels.
Anyone would be naive to think they can enter the black sea without being in the crosshairs of several submarines, land / sea based anti ship missiles... And the rest. The fighters are only the defences you can see. Guaranteed they are being targeted by a lot more than that. It's the sheerest stupidity and arrogance to sail into the Black Sea and think you can win. Those sailors wouldn't stand a chance. So close to being cannon fodder. And yes, i'm British.
It's not even about submarines and the black sea Russian squadron. The fact is that the Crimea has a very powerful coastal defense, where the entire coast is studded with anti-ship missiles. and whoever enters the water area is immediately under the gun, the chances of survival are very small.
@@leogrin9324 я бы сказал 0 шансы ))
There's no need to enter Black Sea, to defeat Russia. Moreover, there's no need to open fire, to defeat Russia :) Russia is a parody for USSR, which was a much more powerful state. What happened to USSR? It just collapsed under it very own internal problems. So will Russia.
@Matty UK Yeah and i'll be okay stepping in front of a bus... My head is state of the art technology.
The mad thing about it is the ship would of downed the lot aswell aa destroy any incoming missiles at the same time! Very very powerful warship is the type 45!
Yep, even the USA navy said they type 45 destroyer is as good as it gets and can pack a hell of a punch.
Not sure about that. More likely half a dozen planes downed and a ship sunk.
@@andytyrrell5153 Depends, there is a reason why they said if the fighter jets get within 2miles they would shoot them down, at long/medium range those russian jets don't stand a chance. But the closer they get the more danger the ship is in. Plus's also depends on the type of Russian jets, most of Russia's jets are old apart from some of the new 5th generation which they mostly use to show off and trying to convince everyone we should be scared.
Crimea this is the ship. That you shot down there. Anglo Saxon fled.
Not a chance it can defend missile attacks upto Mach 3 but Russian hypersonics such as Kinzhal are Mach 9
only 1 aircraft can send them to the bottom. that close the the land means that surface to surface and antiship missales are in range. dont wanna talk about ballistic missales.
You ever heard of CWIS?
Ты рассуждай про ракеты, а звездец придет как пришел к СССР - без всяких ракет. А этот корабль (условно говоря) тебе опять окорочков привезет, за которыми ты будешь в очереди давиться :)
@@МаринаМишина-ц2р Не, ну точно говорю про сало. Тебя прям таки тянет на что нибудь съестное. Ну не хочешь сала, могу выслать тобою вожделенных окорочков. Окорока будут качественные, без ГМО и "химии", при всем при этом Маде Ин Раша. Не бойся, в твою порцию Новичка не накапаем, ты же не Скрипаль и не Навальный.
@@kaij.d7307 I think you mean CIWS and i'ts not 100% effective, especially when dealing with multiple missiles.
we must send a couple of Russian frigates to the coast of England to ensure freedom of navigation on its shores. Why should democracy be only on the shores of Russia ? Let there be a democratic movement of different warships and off the coast of England . You can even make a salute over London in honor of the opening of navigation
Illiterate
@@bradywhelan3866 machine translation ..The flight range of the hypersonic anti-ship missile "Zircon" in new tests will more than double: it will have to hit the target at a distance of about a thousand kilometers. This is reported by TASS with reference to a source in the military-industrial complex. previous tests of the hypersonic missile took place in early October: the Zircon successfully hit a target at a distance of 450 kilometers. The flight speed reached Mach 8, the altitude-28 kilometers. At the same time, the launch was first shown on video, however, the video turned out to be short - the newest rocket instantly disappeared from view.
@@ТатьянаМ-э2л congratulations you think you can take out an anti-air warship from the britts. We all know its the Americans that make you sweat.
@@bradywhelan3866 You misunderstood the previous comment. Russia has hypersonic missiles "Zircon" and that is why the Americans are sweating, and you are among them.
@@leogrin9324 first of all, I'm highly aware of these missiles and second, I'm not at all because I'm not an American. Dipshit 🤣🤡
My old captain on HMS Norfolk there
I wonder how ready the ship was to actually engage the aircraft and how quickly it could do so. It was always just going to be posturing from the Russians of course.
They didn't seem too bothered and didn't appear to be at "Action Stations"
20 targets can be engaged in a gap of 30 to 90 secs @@Rasterizing
I don't know if the crew of Duncan are acting so arrogant because they are on TV and don't wanna lose face or they actually believe themselves. "They had 17 aircraft, we've got 48 missiles, I think we're gonna win"... That's like saying, "I'm facing 17 enemies but I have a gun with a magazine of 48 bullets so I think I'm gonna win." If a single ship could defeat 17 airplanes that easily (4th or 5th gen is irrelevant) than you'd be proving aircraft carriers are a waste of money. Yet the US keeps building them, and you built a new one just a few years ago.
This sort of arrogance and underestimating your enemy is how people lose winnable battles.
I suggest you do your research, that ship could track and launch missiles simultaneously and destroy all the planes around it. It’s possible the best air defence ship in the world.
@@damedusa5107 holy copium
britbongers are on another planet of stupidity. when will anglos learn their place🤦♂
@@damedusa5107 it wouldn’t have the chance to fire if a hypersonic missile was launched. Ships are sitting ducks in modern times
for those chanting in awe of russia. the aircraft equipment types (dropkick, slotback, top plate) are all cold war. tl;dr they're 30+ year old garbage that russia dusted off for a 'display'. not only would they have lost. but the loss would have been both embarrassing and expensive.
SMH at Russia. They are always the bully until they actually try and pick a fight against someone smaller, then they get their asses kicked.
Got to ask the question, why did the ship need to be there?
International waters...
To test Russias response and to send a political message that the UK sees those waters as Ukrainian and not Russian
@@yorkshire_tea6875 which is completely correct
Videos like this are hilarious to me - A Brit who's been to Russia a few times and love the place
And? One Brit loving Russia is supposed to stop all tensions?
Yeah, it’s great living in an autocratic kleptocracy
@@eddiel7635 as opposed to a monarchy?
@@stephen4121 constitutional monarchy
"They don't know how capable this ship is"
'40 incomming anti ship missles'-"SO YOU HAVE CHOSEN DEATH"
the Russian navy is piss poor out of every country in the world more submarine disasters and half of there bloody fleet is still on diesel and as for the air force it is stuck in the 80s hand me downs the fact is the range of radar and the range of HMS Duncan's weapons systems would mean they wouldn't even get close to HMS Duncan. Russia resorts to sneaky cowardly nerve agent attacks because there capabilities suck ass all the commies have are nukes to make them a threat and even then they didn't even figure that out for themselves they stole it. The Russian military is a joke kind of like Russia as a whole only have to look at the country's infrastructure still stuck in the cold war era looking jank with f'd up roads not really a country to be afraid of.
You didn't hear him right, the ship is carrying 40 anti-jet missiles.
@@happilystoned ah yes, propaganda and bias, best way to get fucked on the battlefield once you encounter your enemy
"Underestimate your enemy and you have allready lost the war" - Art of War
@@happilystoned It's like saying that someone with an M1 Garand can't kill you because your equipment is way more advanced.
@Matty UK 4 submarines actually.
But they have powerful radar right on the coast of Russian territory. The Russians probably picked up that there was a powerful radar on that ship and scrambled a large amount of planes to scare of the destroyer. All countries do this. It’s not naive they are just protecting there borders. Like Russia would get global condemnation if they parked a destroyer with powerful radar right off the coast of Edinburgh. Also I must say it is very British of us to applaud ourselves for doing nothing. Just told the Russians to stay back for their own safety, which they complied to do. Also, yeah that destroyer has a shit ton of missiles. But they have a shut ton of missiles on their wings plus they have flares and other countermeasures. The destroyer would sink. Maybe blow some planes up. But it would be a loss for us unfortunately.
As a Russian - nobody wants to die at some war. Your guys had a practice with a radar, Russian pilots had a practice how to attack a foreign ship in the Black Sea. Both can express bravada... I miss the days when we have been meeting the British sailors in St.Petersburg during the Russian NAVY day. Seen a couple of half dead drunk Britts naked on Nevsky prospect... Guys had fun. So it would be way more fun if the Russian pilots and British NAVY would play a football game and late get drunk together.
@@КалининЮрий-о6й Британия всегда была врагом для России, даже тогда когда сражались с гитлером ! Они после втрой мировой войны хотели напасть на Россию !
@@ДмитрийПанфёров-т6б в международной политике важно строить мосты, а не заборы. И всегда помните аксиому - у наций нет постоянных врагов или постоянных друзей. У наций есть интересы. Для государства Россия что выгоднее - забор или мост?
То что это территория России, думают только в России. Согласно международного права это территория Украины, а Россия - оккупант.
@@МаринаМишина-ц2р Марина, России наплевать - кто и что думает. Точно так же как и США наплевать кто там признал или не признал аннексию Техаса, Нью Мексико и Калифорнии. Весь нормальный мир понимает де-юре может быть и не РФ, но де-факто это РФ и Россия не отдаст Крым ни при каких условиях. И никто не собирается воевать с Россией за Крым, включая олигархов и их детей в Киеве и Лондоне.
Thank you all armed uk force personnel for your duties in protecting the uk and countries from tyrants
Ships are sitting ducks these days when you have hypersonic missiles
hypersonic missiles arent accurate. Surface temp of missile exceeds 2000c... hence this disrupts nav signals..
Salam from the Crimean Tatar people Freedom to Crimea, together we are strong!
Да ни фига ты не Стронг раз в Крыму остался
"What they don't know is how capable this ship is" said the Captain of HMS Hood
Поймут не только лишь все.
HMS Hood was a WW1 battleship sunk by a WW2 battleship the Bismark. The Russian jets are Cold War era whilst the Royal Navy Destroyer is the most capable air defence warship in the world.
@@thethanoskillingkind3180 that thing would be overwhelmed by missiles fired from Crimea itself
@@briant5685 Russia wouldn't even risk it, turkey alone would beat Russia in the black sea, never mind the rest of the NATO countries, plus's Romania has been working hard on a new middle system that can sink ships from very long range and scares the shit out of Russia. Backed and paid by the USA of course.
@@thethanoskillingkind3180 hood was a ww1 battle cruiser. Not a battleship
48 missiles 17 aircraft I think we would of won here 😂
That's funny cause there's hundreds of missiles ready to fire at shore.
If one aircraft will have atleast five missiles then 17 aircraft will have atlist 85 missiles.
and yet it will just take one russian missiles and there be in cold water
@@knowledge3563 exactly, lots of.bravado which is expected from the underfunded European Unions or UK military but in a shooting match it's not checkers it's chess. Leave the heavy lifting to the US
@@jamesdewer hehhheeh ok sure if you think so in russia we love chess let play
I like how he said oh they got 17 fighter jets,but we got 48 missiles, but fighter jets do have chaff/flares and jammers, you idiot."
oh how insightful of you. thanks for letting us know...we'll let the ops room crew know as i'm sure they have no idea
@@jcsixties422 just saying what true countermeasure defence system are there for a reason.
Modern systems will not be fooled by chaff and flares - that's what AI and real time digital signal processing is all about.
I'll go with the captain's redaction. You're just an arm chair quaterback! 😂😂
The fact that you think a fighter has jamming capabilities proves you have no clue
5 years later, RN withdraws 2 frigates from the Red Sea, because they can’t get crew.
Good luck…
The amount wrong with this sentence is mind boggling. The Royal Navy didn't withdraw frigates from the Red Sea you melt. If what you say is true then how did they get their with no crew??
Both frigates were due to retire, only the second one was retired early as the crew was an issue. This happens from time to time.
Thats a pretty cool floating wizard hat
what if Russian nuclear submariane with 20 intercontinental ballistic missales each carrying 10 nuclear warheads surface 30 miles from UK border?
Mario Aleksandrov They are already there so what’s your point.
Britain would offer them fish and chips.
They do that already! as does NATO warships.
Reznov Nata offer them fish and chips and if they declined bye bye they go to the bottom of the ocean
are they defecting or something, why would they do that?
I wonder how many of those plains are still flying today lol.
A lot of them probably are nothing but a lot of wreckage in Ukraine now.
Lot’s of em
All keychains today!
Enough to wipe Europe out of map
@@sunnyjaggi Uh, huh. They haven''t been able to defeat the Ukrainian Air Force yet.
Jog on! We've got 48 missiles!...... 🤣 Seriously though, great job!.
So he's implying every single one of their missiles ought to be a one shot kill... I highly doubt that.
Given this specific scenario I'd rather sit in an agile fighter jet maybe, just maybe having to defend 2-3 missiles than sitting in a huge ass boat moving slower than a sloth having to counter 17 attackers at the same time.
@@Lexor888 more than 80% would be unlike russian munitions ours are highly effective.
@@BoostyGeoff Just because I'm not buying into that captains british BS doesn't mean I'm not from the west too - I'm german btw so the weapons you are refering to are mine too :P
Where did you get that BS 80% number from? Do you personally test ammunition for some NATO country? Again, I highly doubt that number - and even if so... The situation is a single ship on a foreign coastline. Do you really think the russians don't have the power to eliminate one single ship on their own turf? That's stupid - none of our NATO ships will survive alone against a foreign power on their own turf.
@@Lexor888 Yeah I don't think a german that backs russia has any opinion of value considering the history of your country.
@@tankourito5419 Nice deflection!
17 planes but we have 48 missiles good luck but how many have the planes got ?
If the ship is 'just 30 miles off the coast of Crimea, what did the RN expect?
We go where we want , coward
Мне показалось, на БИП немного самоуверенно-расслабленная обстановка. Нельзя так, ребятки, враги кругом))
дык реально по пиздюлятору давно не получали
Враги у вас кругом а у них противник
Это постановочное видео снято позже реальных событий.
Мастера постановок ето раша уж вам равних нетнет
@@mayor7829 А кто то спрашивал мнение у предателей? Мнение зомбированных технологами промывания мозга англосаксов, никого не интересуют, пусть они варятся в своей каше. Не мешайте общаться людям.
" They have 17 planes, we have 48 missles" BUT! if they each fire two missiles then we wouldn't have enough missiles. Russian jets reguarly fire missiles in pairs when i see videos of them over Syria. Added to that, there was possibly a Kilo-class submarine in those waters too.
@Din Djarin Fucked by more sanction? xD
@Din Djarin by who you fucktard? A sunken RN ship?
@Din Djarin Не, факаться ин зе асс это сугубо ваше - европейское. Мы пока еще убогие ретрограды и варвары в этом плане и предпочитаем женские вагины. Кстати, если верить Бивору, то мы по достоинству оценили 2 млн дойче ваджайнас, заметь это все в эпоху без голубых таблеток. Представляешь какая сейчас будет эрекция у русского солдата в эпоху Виагры и свободы мировых взаимоотношений по линии Россия - НАТО (которое не расширяется на восток ни на дюйм)
@Din Djarin certainly WAS..
Thales would have taken care of any stray missiles.
In a real world combat scenario, none of those aircraft would have got even a look at Duncan. In the same way that she'd likely have never set proper eyes on them either.
Thats not true, she detected them taking off.. there is no hiding from that radar.
@@EnglishScripter: I believe you misunderstood what he wrote. I believe he is speaking of actually physically seeing each other with their eyes, not talking about seeing each other on radar.
Oh I see. Thanks, for clearing it up. Re-reading it now, that looks like the case.@@PlanetBlake
They think one ship can defend itself infront of more than 5 aircrafts😂
So you are thousand miles away from your country, next to another country and they are the ones bothering you? Yea sounds right.
@Matty UK ill start by stating your historical credibility. I'll be blunt, you are the furthest away from being saints. Not the Turks or the Germans level, but you aren't far. Are you sure it's not the other way around dear NATO member? All the western nations under one umbrella targeting Russia, what's that for? After the fall of the Soviet Union you f*cked them up. Your own historians, tacticians, geopolitical analyzers wanted to separate Russia into 3 states so it could be easier manipulated. We know the trend, you gave half Cyprus to the Turks. Thankfully history can give us the information we need to analyze situations like these.
Do us a favour and educate yourself
1. Russia always breaches British airspace
2. They were travelling in an international strait
In conclusion shut the fuck up
@Matty NATO simp
Just imagine if a Russian warship was this close to the American homeland. we are just asking for war. And then we still play the victim 🤣
The point is this is off Crimea and the uk views this as Ukraine. I believe this ship was visiting Odessa to show our support and deliberate crossed into Ukrainian crimea water
@@HaiLsKuNkY do they care abt uk views?
@@noname-sz4br Yes. Otherwise no planes would've appeared in the sky.
What are the Brits doing next to Crimea in the first place?
Same thing that the Americans do.Provoke the Russians so you can get a video like this.Ironic how when Russia does it,they’re the agressors
@@Свевладовић How was UK provoking Russia while conducting passage in an international strait smh
@@Свевладовић no one has ever provoked the Russians. The Russians are committing genocide in a free and democratic country and they are threatening NATO for no reason. NATO is an entirely defensive alliance that will never attack anyone until its attacked itself. They are only getting ready in case all Russians have a death wish.
Now , that's just showing off , we don't have that many serviceable jets in total 😢😢😢😢😢
48 Missiles. I hope there are more than that.
triggered russians in the comments
Can you blame them, britain sending warships to their backyard. you just read the british press when the russians send a couple ships through the english channel they throw a hissyfit and the dumb mps go crying to the pm in parliament. fundamentally threatening any country with a show of might is an aggressive move. and it doesn't create stability.
@@---cf9bj when the russians send their fleet to the channel, its noted in the papers and the navy sends a frigate. In this case, one ship is in international waters and they send planes to harass it, and its in an area Russia took by force illegally. There's no comparison.
@@internetenjoyer1044 First of all, russian ships also pass through international waters when going through the english channel. it doesn't stop the media hysteria and war hawk mps from having a tantrum over it. secondly we send the same warning messages to them as they do to us. we scramble jets and send warships to ward them off.
Finally, you need to do your research pal because the people of crimea are first of all native russians and secondly they voted in an overwhelming majority to RE-Join the russian federation, there was nothing forceful about it. in fact it was the definition of democracy, the people of crimea chose to be russian.
@@---cf9bj Yes, Russia is allowed to pass through the channel. The point is that, aside from tabloids making a fuss (and they should, it's deliberate provocation, unlike one ship) and a small number of ships and planes set to watch them, nothing happens. Contrast that with sending 17 planes to fly dangerously close to one ship in an intimidation attempt. Unlike Russia, Britain respects the right of travel in international waters. Regarding the referendum in Ukraine, it was clearly illegal and has no founding, but I don't want to focus on that. All I'm saying is that there's no parallel between the British response to Russia sending it's fleet to the English channel and the Russian response
@@---cf9bj Russia has actively entered the territory of MANY NATO states. Also they happen to currently commit genocide in the free and democratic country of Ukraine. They really shouldnt be surprised that NATO is getting ready in case Russia has a death wish ;)
what people on here forget and the armchair Admirals forget to that the Type 45 destroyer Radar can track up to 1000 objects and they were operating in International waters as a Blue Water Navy following their commitment to NATO and there is equipment on that ship that is top secret and as it is open waters i am pretty sure that HMS Duncan could handle 17 aircraft not forgetting that there would be other ships operating in the same waters that would lend a hand
You are a moron. No ship from any country close to a major power will last 5 minutes. Have a look at Crimea...its called a porcupine for a reason...
The Sampson radar picked the jets up and locked on before they even took off, all 17 jets would be destroyed by the sea viper missiles before they got in range to sink the Duncan!
you do know they can launch dozens of anti ship missiles at once
with range up to 500km ,those aircraft are for show of force
"Locked on before they took off" you're not the smartest are you.
@@DrippaDome-98 - he only uses one braincell when tipping, no wonder....
How many of those jets and their pilots are now KIA? Turns out they were a bit of a paper tiger.
type 45 is amazing but i can't wait for the type 83 to replace them.
I don't care how capable the duncan is in a real battle situation that ship is going to the bottom of the black sea without a doubt.
To be fair in a war situation they wouldn’t have let them get close, they’d have fired as soon as they saw them on radar, but because it’s not war time they don’t want to spark an international conflict.
What would you do in this situation?
@@MagikarpMan Russian anti ship missile would sink that ship before they knew a missile was coming
@@googleuser4268 and that would spark an international conflict involving many powerful countries, choosing to attack is a very serious decision that no personal on any nations vessal would green light unless absolutely necessary
@@googleuser4268 no. Not with that ships many radars lol it can see and track everything,it's crazy how powerful it's systems are. The missile would be shot down before it got close lol
@@googleuser4268 you do realise hms Duncan has 37 heat seeking anti aircraft missiles that would of out all then Russian jets in the water
" ...we had a response from one plane but it was garbled..." what was wrong with my english school with a scottish bias ?
Warning is the russian troll!
Warning fortnight kid.
17 Russian fighter jets Vs 43 British Laser, heat, radar and computer programmed missiles.
Not going to say any more. You do the math
One Argie ancient sky hawk fighter bomber armed with WW1 iron bombs takes out British Destroyer Laugh. 48 missiles, what a laugh the Russians could take the rust bucket out without the planes leaving Russian territory.
@@charlesfrogg1 it's well documented the fire control systems on the untested missile defence system couldn't handle low flying aircraft. The system on the T45 has been proven to manage with drone missiles. So maybe make your comments more relevant next time your desperately clawing for attention?
17 vs 1
@Brit Mk 2 The reality is that we wouldnt even use plane to sink that piss pot of yours. Bastion missiles would do it.
@Brit Mk 2 English impudence and lack of intelligence-is this the second happiness ? Anti-ship missiles from the island of Crimea at a speed of 2 km per second sew any floating suitcase in a couple of minutes . Planes don't need to take off ..
Lon range radar and contacts at 10 miles ? Something is off on the narration
The Russians must bring democracy to the coasts of England and America ))
Они бы и рады, но штаны треснут. Уже тягались с "агрессивным блоком НАТО", напомнить чем закончилось? :) Окорочкам были рады от блока :)
@@МаринаМишина-ц2р напомнить, чем закончилось? Вы, судя по всему, не в курсе. Всё только начинается ;)
How? Your military has run out of equipment and ammunition. You have a dinosaur of an aircraft carrier in dry dock and the Moscova has been sunk. You're Russian, so I'm probably replying to a dead man.
3:38 pinnacle of British humour
"If they were there to attack" you will definetely not able to even catch saying it ! hahahahahaha
Wonder what response a Russian warship 30 miles off the coast of England would get
Would be interesting to find out.
I saw a simulation of this. All 17 jets were shot down
"I think it was a challenge for russia". Clowns... xD
@Brit Mk 2 Check out the range of this ship's air defense and Russian anti-ship missiles.
@Brit Mk 2 SAM PAAMS - max range 80 km. Old version of Russian air anti-ship missile X-35 -130 km, X-35U 260 km.
@Brit Mk 2 These aircraft could destroy the ship without entering the air defense zone. Are you not very smart?
@Brit Mk 2 The main point that I want to convey. A British ship in the Black Sea brings a smile. Not more.
@Brit Mk 2 This vessel enough only 1 missile for the end, if you dont know it. Any of this jets can do it.
Remember the fate of HMS Broadsword (F88) , ,Coventry (D118) and HMS Sheffield (D80)
The admiralty did not expect these ships to sink but sink they did
Converted from nonnmilitary designs with poor damage control and shortened hulls, lacking the Sea Wolf air defence systems to save money.
The Type 45 is a dedicated air defence destroyer with multiple ways to down those planes or stop their weapons, from Aster 30 and Aster 15 to the CIWS, or electronic measures.
It would take a very large air attack to overwhelm her defences.
and take note, with out the british jet engine design you cant do the job for your jets alone.
@@AllThingsCubey finally, someone who speaks sense 🤣
@@TheBritishEmpire920 yeah makes scense all right. Some mighty fire power required to protect the stock piles of Earl gray stashed below deck. Wouldn't want those Russians coming and spoiling tea time with their vodka and babushkas. I would personally use a diamond item with sharpness 3 and a few stacks of tnt.
@@sti8u only sharp 3??
нех тута плавать (именно плавать, спецы в курсе что плавает дурнопахнущая субстанция , а моряки ходят ), brits go home
А спецы в курсе что нет капитанов дальнего хождения, но есть капитаны дальнего плавания?
@@ВиталийВикторович-э1н у кого туалет, а не гальюн, пол, а не палуба - те плавают и не различают что есть судно (подсказываю - сугубо гражданское плавсредство), а что есть корабль...
Very interesting body language by the radar operator reacting to his superior at 3:40.
Aye, he looks a wee bit less cocksure about that. I mean, these are formidable ships and the world’s most powerful air defence destroyers, but send enough aircraft (“targets”) and that still leaves their anti-ship missiles - presumably launched prior to their own immolation-by-suicide mission - to counteract. My guess is that at least one, maybe more, gets through to cause perhaps fatal damage. HMS Duncan has 17 targets, plus however many missiles might theoretically be launched, to contend with; they’ve just got HMS Duncan to defeat. This is why it’s a foolish admiral who sends a ship unescorted into the littoral zone of a major power, and is also why in wartime a flotilla - possibly with carrier-based air cover in tow and at least one fast attack submarine on fleet protection duties - would likely be deployed instead. Layers upon layers of air defence because one ship operating alone is a sitting duck no matter how powerful she happens to be.
Makes me proud and patriotic. I would love to see a similar documentary series for the new Dauntless class submarines.
Welll done to all the guys in keeping us safe
by teasing a bear at his house?
Guess the same would happen if Russian frigate come 30 miles close to UK
thay do
And the accompanying tug boat of course.
That's a pretty dumb things for the russians to do. The ship was no threat to Crimea at the time and there was nothing to gain from this pointless posturing. On the other hand it offered intel for nato forces on scramble times, aircraft types and numbers, what ordnance would be carried, EW data, radar profile data and who knows what else. With rapid fire VLS you shoot down 17 planes in a minute.
On the other hand, even with a probability of intercept of 99%, which is doubtful, you can't afford to get hit even once. So standard doctrine is to allocate two missiles per incoming threat, or at least it was not too long ago. 48 missiles really do go very quickly.