World’s Top 5 Naval Close-in Weapon System (CIWS)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2020
  • #World’s Top 5 Naval Close-in Weapon System (CIWS)
    USE HEADPHONES FOR BETTER EXPERIENCE
    IMPORTANT: HELP ME BUILD THIS CHANNEL. IF YOU ENJOY THIS VIDEO PLEASE SUBSCRIBE.
    Protecting the naval surface fleet requires specialised naval air defence systems, which combine autonomous sensor technologies with weaponry to detect and destroy aerial threats. What are the best systems of today?
    Here are Diversus TV Top 5 CIWS video.
    Facebook: / diversustv
    EpidemicSound No copyright music:
    www.epidemicsound.com
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 288

  • @gumelini1
    @gumelini1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Everyone:we have CIWS
    Russia:That's sweet
    Kashtan background noises

  • @Pavelsome
    @Pavelsome 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Wow! Dude that russian's (Soviet) Kashtan looks like it is from a fantastic movie as Matrix or The Terminator!..

    • @scrmepal
      @scrmepal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes the Russians don't mess about when they design their weapons systems...there is no soft kill version. The Russians go for the Terminator approach.....:)

  • @scrmepal
    @scrmepal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    For sheer gun power, the Chinese 11-barrelled type 1130 CIWS, is a beast, and a Chinese TV report stated that it could stop incoming anti-ship missiles up to a speed of Mach 4 with a 96% success rate.

    • @FloppyCat1990
      @FloppyCat1990 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wouldn't trust 'Chinese TV' anything

    • @The_Woodss
      @The_Woodss ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@FloppyCat1990 it's true it got tested and proven

    • @odd_bobble9106
      @odd_bobble9106 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then why did they not show it...
      The only ones we shoot anything are the American and the Netherland guns while the Russian ones and Chinese one only showed it firing

    • @eagol
      @eagol 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@odd_bobble9106 Believe it or not. Checked the latest sea-trial video of the 003 carrier, the model equipped in the carrier are the latest modified version of 1130, came with AESA radar (rectangular antenna iso the old one use disc type antenna), capable of tracking multiple targets and prioritize them according to the threat levels. Its the first of its kind using mini AESA radar on CIWS.

  • @sumyamchi
    @sumyamchi ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1. Type 1130 (China)
    2: Pantsir (Russia)
    3: Type 730 (China)
    4. Goalkeeper (Netherlands)
    5: Kashtan (Russia)
    ps. Phalanx shouldn't even be in contention. It uses 20mm which has inferior range to any 30mm ammunition while having lower rate of fire.

  • @Bean_Amazing
    @Bean_Amazing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I like the name, goalkeeper. Because it is actually the last line of defense

  • @ricardomartins8765
    @ricardomartins8765 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great video, great info. Thanks

  • @sameerthakur720
    @sameerthakur720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    This is primarily a gun or gun-missile CIWS list. There are pure missile CIWS like RAM, Sea-Ram, Barak or Sea Wolf. Sea Wolf is amazing, considering its age.

    • @williampaz2092
      @williampaz2092 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sea Wolf has been constantly and consistently been upgraded.

  • @waldemarleite1256
    @waldemarleite1256 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    IMPRESSIONANTES!

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Obrigado pelo seu comentário positivo. Fico contente que meu vídeo o agradou. Saudações

  • @user-rz4qy1ts2f
    @user-rz4qy1ts2f 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Well, 730 is 7 barrels 30mm CIWS which named H/PJ-12, the specs you put are actually 1130 CIWS, H/PJ-11, which means 11 barrels 30mm CIWS, around 11000/min. Don't know too many details about this since it been used in recent Type 052D, 055, and 001, 002 carriers. CCTV actually has some firing footages using that 1130, the footage in this video was blur but I would say it is probably 730 CIWS not 1130 CIWS.

  • @baliharsingh548
    @baliharsingh548 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bless you. I’m. Like

  • @stangarcia
    @stangarcia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Top

  • @Tuanod
    @Tuanod 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow!~

  • @joaomoura5064
    @joaomoura5064 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome vídeo

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much for your positive comment. I am pleased that you enjoyed it. Best regards primo.😜

  • @setjafetamaromartinez3421
    @setjafetamaromartinez3421 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    these weapons systems reminds me the Destroid Mechs from Robotech

  • @jakovfilipovic5739
    @jakovfilipovic5739 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Where is AK 630 DUET

  • @scrmepal
    @scrmepal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The Phalanx is actually supposed to be a bit weaker than the other CIWS in this list probably due to it using only 20mm shells, rather than the others 30mm shells. Plus Phalanx is popular mainly to the fact it is a cheap option, as it can just literally be bolted onto a deck of a warship, whereas systems like Goalkeeper retrofitted to ships need extensive work inside the ship so it can be fitted.........just ask the Royal Navy.

    • @pipmill7076
      @pipmill7076 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've noticed UK uses phalanx.

    • @scrmepal
      @scrmepal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pipmill7076 ....umm, that's what my comment said...:)

    • @lukeallison3713
      @lukeallison3713 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Phalanx might use a 20mm gun but the main reason its still relevant against these systems and better than weapons like the ak-630 which should be better on paper is its software and tracking abilities within the actual module- which is why sea-ram reuses that module, phalanx is probably a lot more expensive than ak-630, Dardo, etc and equivalent to the weapons on this list. Goalkeeper was probably better than Phalanx in the 80's and 90's, not sure now. Its been phased out in a lot of navies and lost pace with phalanx in some of the navies its continued in service unmodernised in. Phalanx is cheaper to update and support thanks to the support of the larger US arms industry but the goalkeepers that have been modernised in dutch service are probably better pieces of kit

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lukeallison3713 First of all, AK-630 is not on this list so not really a system to compare with, and the fact that more use it or that it’s cheap or easy to maintain do not say anything about quality.
      Would like to know what in Phalanx that does it better then Type 1130 as an example, or Goalkeeper.

    • @lukeallison3713
      @lukeallison3713 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrCastodian I just said it is in fact updated more frequently than (some of) the 30mm weapons and therefore the 20mm shell disadvantrage is less significant- while goalkeeper, despite its firepower will not have been updated with new blocks. However the type 1130 volume of fire is unprecedented apart from the similarly large kashtan- and if its as accurate as claimed, its clearly miles ahead of phalanx. Actually think western ciws should go in the direction of 35 and 40mm weapons with AHEAD or similar technology while trying to increase fire rate and 57 and 76mm weapons with guided rounds like dart and mad-fires rather than provide an answer to the 1130, its the pinacle of its type of ciws

  • @user-wu2fl8wk4q
    @user-wu2fl8wk4q 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    А где ,,Дуэт".10000 выстрелов в мин.?

  • @4dbullshitpatroll6
    @4dbullshitpatroll6 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree with this list

  • @VadimCC
    @VadimCC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Before watching the video:
    Ok, top-5 weapons let me guess... It will include (i) some European (swiss or french) system that looks cool but barely used due to high costs, (ii) modern Russian system that is placed on place 3-5 without even looking at its characteristics, (iii) some 80-s development US system that is put on the №1 spot for propoganda reasons.
    After watching the video:
    Wow, I stand corrected! Thanks for the honest video!

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi there... Thank you for your positive comment. This list is based on my personal opinion, but obviously not everyone agrees with me.best regards

  • @Jarare.z
    @Jarare.z 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Oerlikon millenium?(2)
    Very effective for missile attack defence

  • @brawlerstar2654
    @brawlerstar2654 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👌👍

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn’t forget you. Canada navy. Regards

  • @bitterlifes
    @bitterlifes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well ! from my point of view i think that the best all round CIWS is Oerlikon Millenium 35mm/1000 rpm Swiss/German made revolver cannon.
    This system its better than the other gatlingunn CIWS, because it is less complicated, more reliable, maybe less expensive, it have excellent radar and sensors...
    I think that the only down side would be a ammunition capacity, which would be beetter to increase.
    In other hand, all gatllingunn systems are good for movies, power demostration, powerfull looking from the outside view, but in real situation thay are not as thay look like.

  • @brandonpeterson6166
    @brandonpeterson6166 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    2:14 THATS THE GOALKEEPER ALSO FROM KSP :O

    • @jimvandeven9732
      @jimvandeven9732 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      KSP? Its from signaal and GE now from Thales group in the Netherlands

  • @MisteriosGloriosos922
    @MisteriosGloriosos922 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Infos!!

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you very much. ✌️I have watch a few of your videos, and you earned another subscriber. Cool channel you got there. Good use of synthetic voice. You use Mathew like I do… great choice.👍 good luck with your channel.

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have referred you to a few more channels 😜

  • @africanelectron751
    @africanelectron751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If you are firing these it's literally your last chances.

  • @tuvidao2011
    @tuvidao2011 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Kashtan - AK630

  • @loyalist5736
    @loyalist5736 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Goalkeeper is the only one I've seen on video shooting down a sea skimming ASM head on .

  • @-qsprey7881
    @-qsprey7881 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You talk about 730 but the info you released is type 1130....
    730 is previous generation product and is a copy of ak630 form Russia .The 1130 is the new generation and should in the top of this list(The only Gatling ciws system with a rate of fire exceeding 10,000 rounds per minute)

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well spotted. I meant to talk about the 1130, forget the 730. Even the footage and the 3D image are the 1130. It was a typing mistake. Apologies and I hope it hasn’t ruined the video for you. Regards

    • @-qsprey7881
      @-qsprey7881 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Diversusmilitary You did a good job, the information of 1130 is hard to find in the English-speaking world.

  • @ramdhanardhiansyah1756
    @ramdhanardhiansyah1756 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Oerlikon millenium ??

  • @saukraya3254
    @saukraya3254 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hyper missile make all those obsolete.

  • @NotThisGuy12
    @NotThisGuy12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    And then the hog flew over and went brrrrrr on the ships before they even saw the hog...

    • @balkan25
      @balkan25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nah cuz the hog can't take ships on he would be killed on sight

    • @carlosperry4301
      @carlosperry4301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@balkan25 hog will be shredded into bits of pieces

    • @TheDplo
      @TheDplo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      While i love this "flying tank" hog and it does wonders in close air support to ground troops, i'd never use them to attack a modern ship at close range. It's both slow and not stealthy, it would be instantly picked up by the radar and sent some SAMs at before even getting remotely close to the CIWS range.
      Only way would be to have enough hogs firing AGMs from different angles around the ship at the same time to both overwhelm the SAM capacity by the hogs number, and overwhelm the CIWS capacity by the incoming AGMs number. (Yeah, Brrrrrute Forrrrce and more Dakka! XD)
      Don't know the rate of fire for typical ship's SAM, % success of fighters couter-measures against incoming SAM, nor how many AGMs are needed to overwhelm a CIWS, but if supposedly that could even be feasible, this expensive "tactic" would incurr heavy losses on the hogs to score a successful hit on a modern ship, looks like they're just obviously not designed for this role.
      But as most CIWS have about twice the range than the hog's cannon it would be both suicidal and useless to try a close-range strike.

  • @hamzaalkhfajy
    @hamzaalkhfajy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    😃🤩👍🏻

  • @WarHoundLACN
    @WarHoundLACN 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Goalkeeper is stroonger than Pphalanx, since 1972 it hardly needed to be upgraded or even unlike the Phalanx it doe snot need multiple versions, it is a multi-purposed system.

  • @Milk_Man_1-1
    @Milk_Man_1-1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i cant find any info on the Type 1130, how do you find this?

    • @btviper5837
      @btviper5837 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      H/PJ-11 CIWS

    • @scrmepal
      @scrmepal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try the Chinese Defence forums!

  • @ravikantsharma9569
    @ravikantsharma9569 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ak 630 ciws

  • @markperacullo7541
    @markperacullo7541 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Intro music pls😁

  • @theoakatsuki
    @theoakatsuki 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Surprised that the Oerlikon 35mm wasn't included but the Type 730 and Phalanx.
    Type 730 is nothing more but a Chinese copy of the 630 ciws.

    • @Lcr34
      @Lcr34 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do your research, 730 is not 630.

    • @theoakatsuki
      @theoakatsuki 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lcr34 its the same. Just 7 barrels. And maybe some Chinese copy of Russian subsystems.

    • @Lcr34
      @Lcr34 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theoakatsuki I wouldn't be half mad if you said they copied goalkeeper

  • @EugeneTit1
    @EugeneTit1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Каштан - самый крутой!

    • @XPEH999
      @XPEH999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Панцирь-МЕ тоже хорош

  • @nathanielmorehouse7640
    @nathanielmorehouse7640 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    intro/outro music?

  • @bjrneriknilsen5334
    @bjrneriknilsen5334 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's not so efficient to sea skimming missile lik NSM.....it's going subsonic less than 5 m above sea level. Realy hard to detect.....especialy when you hav wave condition! And this missile also have counter measure capabilitys against gatling guns like high rate of manouvring.

  • @shubhampatil.6861
    @shubhampatil.6861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just a question is AK 630 good?

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi there! The AK-630 is a Soviet and Russian fully automatic naval close-in weapon system based on a six-barreled 30 mm rotary cannon. It’s very good but this list is only top 5. If it was top 10 probably I would place it in 8th place... regards

  • @jesuschristisgood5284
    @jesuschristisgood5284 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Kashtan is the best CIWS.

  • @gooddieyoung2744
    @gooddieyoung2744 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In reality the kashtan is number 2 and unstoppable.

  • @malachi5813
    @malachi5813 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THe GandonTRON 1000 lmaoo wtf jesus some crazy shit!

  • @Matrix-lz7gj
    @Matrix-lz7gj ปีที่แล้ว

    Modern Warship games 😊

  • @suny1265
    @suny1265 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Pantsier is the best system by far with sintetic aperture phased array Radar system

    • @abuxxx3607
      @abuxxx3607 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Suny12 Ask the Israelis how good the Pantsir is.

    • @suny1265
      @suny1265 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@abuxxx3607 I don't think we are talking about the same thing.

  • @euX222X
    @euX222X 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Italian DARDO are the best, highest range, and the easily to adapt in any ship...

    • @biowaste179
      @biowaste179 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dardo shoot nail, therefore it is carpenter

  • @williamrivas2051
    @williamrivas2051 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    El kashtan en mejor y mas eficas que phalanx, sabes.

  • @Rockstone1969
    @Rockstone1969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Phalanx on two is debatable given effective range of the 20 gatling gun... but I am missing the rolling airframe missile.

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree with about phanlax on 2, it took a lot of researching and in the end the number of navy’s using it made me decide this way. About the not including rolling airframe, I decided to do this video with gun-based CIWS only... best regards

    • @pieterveenders9793
      @pieterveenders9793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Diversusmilitary How does the number of Navy's using it have anything to do with the ranking? The only thing that says something about is how a certain nation keeps ramming it's military equipment through other countries' throats, and not how effective they are.

  • @Omantube
    @Omantube 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, what do you think of Turkey's Aselsan Gokdeniz CIWS?
    Nothing this system has been fitted on all Turkish Naval combat ships and also has been exported to navies of Indonesia, Malaysia and Pakistan.
    Thank you 🌹

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi there! I will find out more about it... thank you , best regards

  • @PotomokPobediteley
    @PotomokPobediteley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Russian "duet"??

  • @jrtiger34
    @jrtiger34 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Chinas type 730 looks like dutch goal keeper😁

    • @woodonfire7406
      @woodonfire7406 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well yeah, China obviously copied it
      Like how they copied almost everything

    • @picknoname3425
      @picknoname3425 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@woodonfire7406 Copied it? 11000 rm copied from Aliens? WAKE UP IDIOT. Some of their military weapons are dope AF.

    • @user-xq2ck6jt6w
      @user-xq2ck6jt6w 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@woodonfire7406 China has the largest number of patents in the world in 2019,and you just adiot

    • @ZORAMHLIMTHLA
      @ZORAMHLIMTHLA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-xq2ck6jt6w china has the largest number of patents as well as the largest IP theft

  • @alessandromazzini7026
    @alessandromazzini7026 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pf otomelara 76 Is the best

  • @ZORAMHLIMTHLA
    @ZORAMHLIMTHLA 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    No.5 is RIM 116 instead of chinese goalkeeper replica

  • @nunugod4327
    @nunugod4327 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oerlikon skyshield

  • @duranacar8889
    @duranacar8889 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bayraktar tb 2 onla tanisana tanışana kadar hepsi çok korkunçtur sonrası kolay hedef

  • @hardyanpajero69
    @hardyanpajero69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    👍😎🍺🍕🚀✈🚢

  • @hardyanpajero69
    @hardyanpajero69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍😎🍺🍩🚢🚀🚀

  • @tanushagarwal6975
    @tanushagarwal6975 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very loud music

  • @ritabratagoswami7724
    @ritabratagoswami7724 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is my favorite AK-630M2 ?

  • @syorukel
    @syorukel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Turkey had her 35mm "Gökdeniz" CIWS shipboard tests completed.

  • @bangkisjakartatimur2230
    @bangkisjakartatimur2230 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Semoga teknologi militer Rusia semakin canggih kedepannya dan menyalakan teknologi militer Amerika serikat dan sekutunya semoga Rusia menjadi negara Adi daya mengatikan Amerika serikat dan sekutunya

  • @helmsmanpavel3713
    @helmsmanpavel3713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kashtan should be number 1

  • @doraancilliers2999
    @doraancilliers2999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Woow Russian one the best

    • @tomwolfe6063
      @tomwolfe6063 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not really. The performance of Russian weapons and equipment typically fall far short of their boastful claims.

  • @MAC-vl7by
    @MAC-vl7by 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Most of weapons made are for defence so there will be no more war they will just keep away to each other hehe

  • @firefighterfrcg5732
    @firefighterfrcg5732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For me CIWS Phalanx is on my Top1

    • @firefighterfrcg5732
      @firefighterfrcg5732 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yogipaisalnugraha4997 IDC if Khastan has the Powerful CIWS i still Love my Phalanx thats still my Top1

    • @maestershaw8604
      @maestershaw8604 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@firefighterfrcg5732 you can say that. Phalanx is skinny sexy while khastan were super thicc 😂😂😂

  • @Lcr34
    @Lcr34 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    No way 20mm phalanx is at 2. It lacks the range the 30mm counterpart has, and you might wanna add SeaRam and Rheinmetall/oerlikon millennium 35mm.

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      High there... range is not all but respect your opinion. Searam is not Gun based. Please you are welcome to share your list with us... best regards

    • @Lcr34
      @Lcr34 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Diversusmilitary Range and kinetic energy advantages.

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      To be honest with you, CIWS is not my strongest military subject... after reading many articles, I made this list... if I had included searam on this list probably it would be on top together with phalanx but still the new Russian CIWS in first... please keep your knowledgeable thoughts coming, that’s the way my channel can grow... thank you for your participation. Best regards

    • @EdHunter55
      @EdHunter55 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You have to keep in mind it's about more than just the gun doing brrrrrrt it's about the whole system. The phalanx might lack in range but it can be bolted down on virtually any ship and is a mostly self-contained unit. As opposed to the goalkeeper which is turret-mounted and therefor partially below decks. Making it less useful/practical for some navy's. Which doesn't hurt the guns performance but it does limit its use. Same for the Chinese one which was only sutable for larger ships.

    • @Lcr34
      @Lcr34 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @woosh me if you are gay HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

  • @user-od9mn9lb4e
    @user-od9mn9lb4e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    А где Российский дуэт , он круче всех.

  • @crossredline5034
    @crossredline5034 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    AK 630M2 ??????

  • @chen7818032
    @chen7818032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish only if you could rate these system by numbers, not how famous they are.
    How chinese 11,000rounds/mins compares those 4500rounds/mins rated at number 5?

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What about efficiency, reliability, proven technology etc... hi there. Best regards

    • @meand6ix9inedieinprisionpo87
      @meand6ix9inedieinprisionpo87 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Diversusmilitary russian kasthan have 12000 round in minute

    • @weilee467
      @weilee467 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      so, this vedio is a joke

  • @RafaelHernandez-eh3tz
    @RafaelHernandez-eh3tz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mexico debería tener una de esas harmas para su ejército y Marina ya que yo le apuesto ala gran. Madre Rusia. Ven diciones a todos

    • @estebanenrique5777
      @estebanenrique5777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      La madre Rusia no existe y México si cuenta con uno de estos en la POLA

  • @zephbg1191
    @zephbg1191 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plot twist: these weapons get destroyed first when in fight :)

    • @maxblack4596
      @maxblack4596 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Destroyed with what?

    • @CosmicValkyrie
      @CosmicValkyrie 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@maxblack4596 his mother sits on them.

  • @LawasSarawak
    @LawasSarawak 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    all system that are from democracy countries should be on the number 1 spot. god say so

  • @ser43_OLDC
    @ser43_OLDC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Were is the 35mm ciws of Reich metal with a he with detonation of proximity

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi there. This video it’s only the top 5... if it was top10 I certainly would included that system.... thank you

    • @tnix80
      @tnix80 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I also agree it's top 5

    • @tnix80
      @tnix80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Rhinemetall not reich metal btw LMAO

  • @storyexplorationwatch8723
    @storyexplorationwatch8723 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    CIWS is important to the ship. Last defense system.
    What if Falcons and Golgipper combine?

  • @duranacar8889
    @duranacar8889 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hepsi çok kolay hedef

  • @rkkpttrsn8794
    @rkkpttrsn8794 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    American ships have fuel air missiles that within 12 miles can be used in defense applications, usually no hands are out most of the time the deck is off limits.
    Using guns is a thing of the past.

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi there. As it was mentioned in the video, any defense system has its imperfections and it’s always better to have a backup for those times, if any threat sneaks through those primary defense systems... This CIWS are the last line of defense. If they were so useless, the navies wouldn’t bother to install it... don’t know of any combat ship without a CIWS. Best regards...

    • @kyle1538
      @kyle1538 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was a Fire Control man in the US Navy, you are clueless Rikki.

    • @tnix80
      @tnix80 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      >American ships don't need guns
      >Has phalanx
      Pick one
      Fuel air is old tech btw

  • @itzmrman3574
    @itzmrman3574 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cwis’s are basically a shotgun that shoots at 4000+ rpm

  • @user-xl8cn5od3r
    @user-xl8cn5od3r 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Russian Panzir - I`m the best air defence system! US F 35 - I dont thinc sou!

  • @sanderh4403
    @sanderh4403 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Kinda weard the nr 4 from Thales, After some trainings with Nato allies the goalkeeper never missed a target while other nato systems failed. mmmm

  • @audreyisaac1408
    @audreyisaac1408 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where's NBS Mantis?

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Audrey Isaac hi there... this is only top 5.... i can’t include every system. Please share with us what would be your preferred list.... best regards

    • @audreyisaac1408
      @audreyisaac1408 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Diversusmilitary me too i don't have any infornation about this because it is newly made by the german military

  • @avniceylan7322
    @avniceylan7322 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is ASELSAN Gökdeniz?

  • @alexst3333
    @alexst3333 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:33 99% accuracy against hyper-sonic threads??? its a joke?

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s what they say and according to the Chinese military the accuracy is right. Thank you for your participation. Best regards

    • @OriflammeGaming
      @OriflammeGaming 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      90%*

    • @alexst3333
      @alexst3333 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @tfs2O3 "notching 90%" according to the youtube subtitles - again what that mean? )

    • @alexst3333
      @alexst3333 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @tfs2O3 thank you for answer!

  • @marcusfranconium3392
    @marcusfranconium3392 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Phalanx was put next to a goalkeeper back in the 90s and failed miserable as goalkeeper not only targeted its own targets but also that of the phalanx before the phalanx even could see it . And goalkeeper made some american pilots turn their underwear brown and yellow as towed targets where eliminated and it started to chew up the tow cable towards the towing aircraft .

  • @pieterveenders9793
    @pieterveenders9793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Not at all biased huh. The Phalanx is clearly inferior to the Goalkeeper, and both are inferior to the Kasthan, yet surprise surprise the Phalanx somehow made it to 2nd place. What a sham....

    • @georgemartin4811
      @georgemartin4811 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just because it has missiles doesn't make it better bud

    • @pieterveenders9793
      @pieterveenders9793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@georgemartin4811 There are many reasons why it's superior, the missiles are just one of those reasons. Something all the military professionals agree on.

    • @georgemartin4811
      @georgemartin4811 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@pieterveenders9793 I'm not going to have a debate in a youtube comment section, but overall no, it is not superior

    • @pascojm6816
      @pascojm6816 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@georgemartin4811 it is superior

  • @aliabedi8418
    @aliabedi8418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Iran weapons no 1 in this world is named kamand this best all of them

  • @ZainuDeen-os6ck
    @ZainuDeen-os6ck 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Despite that Moskva got sunk.How?

  • @user-bv4uk9jf7u
    @user-bv4uk9jf7u 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    กันโดรนกับจรวด

  • @rubenoliveira3260
    @rubenoliveira3260 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bom video não sei e se confio no que os chineses dizem

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Olá amigo! Não podemos ignorar o grande avanço technologico militar... tudo o que possuem é desenvolvido por eles ou em conjunto com a Rússia... eu não acredito que seja bluff... eles têm tudo para ser a potência que são. Saudações camarada

    • @rubenoliveira3260
      @rubenoliveira3260 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Diversusmilitary pois é verdade, continue o bom trabalho

  • @Richard-wk9le
    @Richard-wk9le 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's a new gun in town its called a laser in both ship born and aircraft.

    • @saukraya3254
      @saukraya3254 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally useless against asbestos coated missile.

  • @Ryan-kq3vg
    @Ryan-kq3vg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is oerlikon?

  • @a.m.armstrong8354
    @a.m.armstrong8354 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Guess Kamikaze won't work anymore..

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol

    • @a.m.armstrong8354
      @a.m.armstrong8354 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Diversusmilitary Tbf it all depended on the quality of the 'ceremonial' cup of saké beforehand..too good and a guaranteed rtb, too cheap and pilots opted for a ceremonial blaze of glory instead. Knowing the Chinese, this daisy wheel replaces the twenty one gun salute..

  • @markgorospe3223
    @markgorospe3223 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTTT

  • @WaqarAhmad-zz9hr
    @WaqarAhmad-zz9hr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    .

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video was made before Ukraine war. Best regards

  • @valfab1517
    @valfab1517 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Phalanx can't hit moving boat, how came to be in 2nd spot..bias analysis

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is quite a statement. Personally I think a bit exaggerated. But I respect everyone’s opinion... best regards

    • @vincem6399
      @vincem6399 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree. Saw another video on its live firing on some drones. NOT impressed. A long trail of tracers out and still missed the target. Looked like it was lagging the target.

  • @garwhittaker3743
    @garwhittaker3743 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Chinese one 1100 rm is crazy fast are you sure ??

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi there! According to some sources this particular Chinese ciws system breakdown very often. Every other channel, military websites etc... rates this system not so good... but yes it’s fast and powerful... and it is quite a recent addition to the Chinese weaponry therefore maybe will change after it proves itself.... tbh with you, the difference between this systems is very slim, so it’s always a very unfair list to make.... the Chinese say that their systems are the best, the us says the same, Europeans the same and the Russians bla bla bla bla... so I can’t make everybody happy... it’s a win win or lose lose situation, there’s no middle term.... best regards and thank you for your participation... peace

    • @garwhittaker3743
      @garwhittaker3743 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Diversusmilitary You can't keep everyone happy, keep up the good work ...uk

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gar Whittaker I am glad that you enjoy my work... thank you for your understanding. Thank you for being a subscriber to my channel. Best regards.

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @Davenport1949
      @Davenport1949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Diversusmilitary You put mass installments of phanlax 2 as key factor for it to be #2, but ingore the mass installments of 1130 on 054A, 052D, 055, 075 and the carriers. If 1130 really breaks down that often as you made up, why wouldn't they just buy the Russian ciws? You are nothing but another biased westner bullshitting about Chinese quality. Oh, I guess the americans don't treat you like white anymore.

  • @lajosszajko6158
    @lajosszajko6158 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Phalanx is quiet weak (20mm) to be in the top 10, not to mention the top 5. Outdated system, unable to counter for example kalibr, onix or brahmos because of its short range and weak projectile. Balast on US ships.

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about reliability, efficiency etc...

    • @lajosszajko6158
      @lajosszajko6158 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      20mm gun is underpowered/short ranged in my point of view against sea skiming supersonic targets, RAM had to be installed for this reason - not to mention the new hipersonic russian toy (Zircon). The time window of a successful intercept against a supersonic target is drastically shortened for seconds. Mach 2-3 ASM flies aprox. 1 kilometer/second, Phalanx has 1-2 second to handle the incoming missile when it is in its range -> 1 burst, quiet an all in situation. Multiple incoming missiles simply oversaturate the system. Kashtan can intercept target at 12 km vs Phalanx 1,5-2km. For reliability: I've neither maintained the beformentioned competitor Kashtan nor Phalanx, so I can't tell that - I think not just me.

  • @TheDarkFalcon
    @TheDarkFalcon 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video, I'm assuming you're from China? Glad to see China's stuff isn't all just listed as number 1 😅🤣🤣

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TheDarkFalcon I am a proud European and above that I am a proud Portuguese Ex military.... best regards

    • @TheDarkFalcon
      @TheDarkFalcon 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Diversusmilitary oh ok 👍
      I've only ever seen Chinese write "best regards"

    • @Diversusmilitary
      @Diversusmilitary  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍

    • @weilee467
      @weilee467 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      but sorry china still no1,u can Google 1130,not sa this video

    • @tnix80
      @tnix80 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@weilee467 most people wouldn't include it in the top 5. I'm not sure personally.

  • @MidwestDIY
    @MidwestDIY 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1 Dollar = 100 Rubles

  • @josephunson4982
    @josephunson4982 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need the russian panzir or kashtan system to protect myself against missile barage from my wife.