To be fair it did take days to render single frames of animated movies with path traced lighting just 20 years ago. So the fact that this card can even do it 18 times per second just shows how far the power of computers have come.
It still can't. Nvidia is doing a lot of tricks to make this possible according to their paper, but I guess it's now path-tracing's time to go through the decades of tricks that rasterization had in order to improve game performance.
@@AnDOnlineify News flash: Literally everything in computer graphics is all about faking stuff and creating illusions. We can't accurately simulate most things, so we create shortcuts and approximations to get close.
@@MartinFinnerup I know. I was just replying to the earlier comment that path tracing is now undergoing optimizations that rasterization has had for decades.
I started learning computer in school using DOS 😅 then we got Windows 95 and then we could play Oregon Trail finally but with a 30 min computer class i could only ever get as far as start my family and then most of them die from dysentery on the way to the first river and the rest drown after my wagon crashed😢. Then windows 2000 and then xp shortly after was all that we had for the rest of the time i was in school 😅
I'm so glad I'm not the only one thinking this. I remember back when I was getting into PC it was all about "can it run Crysis 3?" That was like the ultimate benchmarking game.
Probably FIFA or Fortnite. With magnificent 19% gpu utilization peaks. I swear optimization is not devs' priority anymore. The game only needs to run up to the part where you upload your credit card info
@@soundwavesuperior6761 eh, they optimized it a lot. It's slow because it has full-on path tracing now, which is a feature that's arguably ahead of this generation of hardware's time.
@@soundwavesuperior6761 Crysis tried to be ahead of it's time, but it chose the wrong timeline. It focused more on singe core CPU performance, which didn't turn out to be where the technology really went.
@@Arsoonist you can't deny the MX160 i have IS worse than urs, man i love spending money on GPUs that my integrated GPU does better when using longevity gaming cuz it doesn't take that much RAM to process (mx160 takes 4gb of ram from ur pc) and i can play fairly smoothly in many games
@@lywoh I mean yeah, it would give me very good fps, unless it was cooled with a single fan the size of one of my balls(my balls ain't massive, the fan is small). It does better in the first 10 sec only to throttle and perform shit, so I can't even properly use it.
@@Arsoonist bro same, except I have the mx330 which is *barely* faster than the integrated iris plus graphic. I have another laptop with an mx550 which is sort of a decent chip
Actually kind true.. They know if they were just competing on plain rasteurization, they would lose every single time vs AMD. They had to manufacture their own problem to fix.
@@asd-dr9cfthis is beyond false. They under that we can no longer just keep is using Rasterization. Also hardware RT was not started by Nvidia they just made it possible to do. The gaming industry had already been on the raytracing train years before the 20 series was a thing. If Nvidia still wanted to do Rasterization they'd still blow the competition out but what's the point of keeping on with Rasterization I'd it isn't actually going to make different rendering techniques useful?? Everyone says they had to manufacture their on problem yet the only GPU manufacturer doing this dies off and for years after the 20 series everyone has being following Nvidia's wake and are still losing to Nvidia.
@MrTasos64no you don't understand a damn thing about the rendering techniques being used. Path tracing a game and doing it efficiently in real time is taxing. These technologies are taxing because they are being done in real time unlike the cinematic field were they render in clusters and not in realtime.
So what's a good computer by comparison? Enlighten me. This is one of the most enraging shorts. Like:"your Ferrari is pathetic, it can't even come close to pulling 1200mph" Sooooooo what can?
To put it into a simplistic answer, the only step over consumer grade 4090s, is the professional line of workstation gpus that are used to actually create and render the latest innovations in graphics tech. Which would be like the Ada gen RTX 4000 all the way up to the RTX 6000. So essentially there is no “better” computer to compare it to, because you’d be taking the leap from consumer grade flagship gaming hardware, to professional grade creator hardware.
In terms of current consumer components there isn't one. Maybe the 5090 when it eventually becomes a thing it'll be able to manage 30fps but we'll have to see
I work with Unreal and to render a 1920x1080 with path tracing it takes about 90 seconds with a RTX 3060. So, I'd say 18fps with Path Tracing is insanely fast...
@@mrlightwriter do you 2 think the 3080 could do the same cause this is what I have and I am coming from AMD graphic card. Still getting use to blender and UE5.3
my Chromebook: I am not pathetic I am a being stuck in time and space that refuses to progress, I am a bastion, a fortress, a stronghold! against the new
I mean gpu are already so good.of course standards of people change and actually if you compare any top of the line graphic card to something it can't achieve of course it will look pathetic .it's like comparing a millionaire to a. Billionaire.doesnt means the. Millionaire isn't good .just means we got a high standards for judgements . My
@@Xenor999 rtx is the buzzword nvidia came up with as to not call it "path tracing" but is a scaled down version of path-tracing intended to make realtime "raytracing" possible, path tracing is the whole shabang that renderengines like Cycles,Vray, ETC use to make animations and photorealistic renders.
To be fair Minecraft isn't the best optimized game. I have an RTX 3050 16gb and it can run most modern games at over 100fps and the crazy thing is I bought it for only $700 off Amazon.
@@Nexosist that's not related, but the iphone can run a bunch of high quality games, plus if csgo DOES get phone support, yes it probably would be able to play csgo
(I don’t know computers well) about 2 years ago I got a 3060 and never realized the fans weren’t moveing and now I don know how to make them spin PLEASE HELP
Obviously it’s a test and the fact that the 4090 can even get 18 FPS is amazing. We are far from native path tracing. But they are trying to show how DLSS can help improve performance
@@klippo1235 If you have a 144hz monitor and your 4090 is only putting out 115fps, then it's a waste of money and is indeed pathetc. With a 144hz monitor, you expect to see an expensive flagship card do 144fps.
@@luminatrixfanfiction like people surely did with crysis on new hardware at that time? lol. The red engine is extremely poorly optimized and games are getting more advnanced than our hardware, thus. DLSS
As a 3D Artist I agree, even 1-2fps for 100% PT is awesome especially in such complex game world. Normally the RTX 4090 still can take minutes and more ( 0.016fps if 1min ) to clean single 1080p frame using normal Path Tracing.
I'd rather have smooth framerates over some subtle lighting effects anyday. This is why I like indie games and older games, 60+ FPS fulltime with zero hitches on many of those games.
It’s okay but the amount of expectation from me really left a sour taste, I also think the game should be better instead of being a “graphics bench”. Beautiful game but everything else is ehhh
Well, it sounds like he's saying that your computer sucks because a 4090 can't run cyberpunk over 30 fps without having some RT Overdrive/DLSS feature turned on. Yet makes says the opposite saying that not a lot of computers can use said new feature. Confusing
Ah shit, my integrated gen 7 intel Core i7 on a laptop with a broken fan and cracked screen can’t run Cyberpunk on the highest settings? This is a fucking tragedy.
I know they always use full res textures and high polygon models with no nanite or any other sort of trick, but it takes literal hours to render a single frame of a Pixar movie. 55ms is simply amazing
that graphical feature is a DX13 standard feature, so seeing this in a DX12 game truly means the next physics platform is going to revolutionize the graphical quality of games. very good news for gamers.
@@k1lez ?, you don't sacrifice one part of a game for another part unless its an indie game. Triple A studios have legions of employees dedicated to the story, "graphics", and programming of the game that work in unison but independently of each other. Whether or not the storyboard is good has nothing to do with the guys working on the 3d models and texturing.
It's really weird everyone thinks a GPU is the only thing that can impact your FPS. Your CPU and RAM and Motherboard matter A LOT to this process. Especially in heavily multi threaded games like Cyberpunk.
Eh, I don't think the pathtracing and graphics stuff is running on the cpu. yeah mobo might matter for pcie speed. The higher res you go and the more graphics options you enable, the more it relies on the graphics card. But yeah the other stuff matters too. I don't really care about fps past 120 or 60 depending on the game, as long as it doesn't stutter.
Higher res images and rt is all done on the GPU. All that happens on the mb and CPU is arranging those images in way you can see. And even then modern changes to that pipeline try to limit the back and forth between the CPU and GPU. So you would be wrong. Now if you want more fps and less res then the story is different and the bottleneck can become your CPU though I believe there is a bigger push for latency reduction rather than higher fps. So it just depends on what you play.
![ทางเดินชีวิต - ธีเดช ทองอภิชาติ x อ.ไข่ มาลีฮวนน่า [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1f3wcG16dd4/mqdefault.jpg)
my computer: jokes on you, i AM already pathetic!
Us bro
Me with my Nvidia Quadro K5000:
Same
Me with integrated graphics:
Me with a 2 core cpu and integrated graphics
"your computer is pathetic"
Me and my 2007 PC: "We know" *ugly sobbing*
The core 2 Quad's
My mom gave me her dual core AMD and it still had Windows 7 lol I’m not sure what to do except try to upgrade it and hope it doesn’t catch fire
@@michaelcarrillojr453 yeah bud go for the upgrade
once i get the chance and get to a good stopping point my own pc issues ill work on it and post it
@@pixoarts3262
I have an 4070ti and i get 144fps solid on cyberpunk77 and i play on max settings
To be fair it did take days to render single frames of animated movies with path traced lighting just 20 years ago. So the fact that this card can even do it 18 times per second just shows how far the power of computers have come.
THIS. THIS 💯
Especially in "real time". Those were pre-renders. This is actually doing it live, so it makes it even more impressive.
It still can't. Nvidia is doing a lot of tricks to make this possible according to their paper, but I guess it's now path-tracing's time to go through the decades of tricks that rasterization had in order to improve game performance.
@@AnDOnlineify News flash:
Literally everything in computer graphics is all about faking stuff and creating illusions.
We can't accurately simulate most things, so we create shortcuts and approximations to get close.
@@MartinFinnerup I know. I was just replying to the earlier comment that path tracing is now undergoing optimizations that rasterization has had for decades.
if a 4090 is considered pathetic, i don't even WANT to know what mine is supposed to be called 💀💀💀💀
Extra large with sauce pizza pathetic
@@That_1_Ginger_cathow bout a bean
Intel pentium lookin ahh
Garbage
@@MMC619 nah it be worse than that
"But can it run Cyberpunk 2077 with path tracing?" Is the next GPU benchmark
Hopefully we get a PTX 5090 for path tracing
Crysis: Earth 2023 Remastered + DLC
Yep maybe by 6090 we won't have to turn on fake frames to run cyber punk path tracing lol
"Can it be run by 2077? "
Crazy to think in a short time we will be looking back on this same way with Crysis. I just hope GPU's are not £1500+
My 1997 windows computer that can barely start itself without using all my ram: 👁️👄👁️
Im the same lol i got one of them 1990s toshiba satellites and i love it for retro games
"A gigabyte of ram should do the trick"
You’re not using a pc from 1997 lol
My 2020 dell laptop that takes 15 minutes to be in a somewhat usable state 👁👄👁
I started learning computer in school using DOS 😅 then we got Windows 95 and then we could play Oregon Trail finally but with a 30 min computer class i could only ever get as far as start my family and then most of them die from dysentery on the way to the first river and the rest drown after my wagon crashed😢. Then windows 2000 and then xp shortly after was all that we had for the rest of the time i was in school 😅
"your car is pathetic because it can't even get to the moon"
Legendary lmaoo
खरं आहे.. कॉम्प्युटर कसेही असो नीट उपयोग केल्यास फारच उपयुक्त असते हे नाकारता येणार नाही.
@@tenand11 🗣️🗣️🗣️
Baby patrick
not een the same concept
Old days: "can it run crisis 3?"
Modern day: " can it run cyberpunk 2077?"
I'm so glad I'm not the only one thinking this. I remember back when I was getting into PC it was all about "can it run Crysis 3?" That was like the ultimate benchmarking game.
Can it run sims 3.
idk, i ran crysis 3 on my 4090 last night maxed with AAx8 and it wasn't smooth as it should be lol
Can it run ark ascended?
"Your computer is pathetic"
Hey, he's trying his best
She’s* don’t ask how I know 💀
@@LoonyToony 💀
@@Crescent21 DON'T ASK
@@LoonyToony why 😏
@@sangheilipozole i said... DON'T ASK
I'd say that simulating light, 18 times a second is actually pretty insane
Ya don’t know how they managed to even program that must be why cyber was in dev for 20 years
Ye but before 24 u see images switching and not a video
@@yungcalvin798imagine spending years on perfectly simulating real lighting only for it to be too good for any pc or console to run
@@VarnicaGamerKidbefore 24? More like before 60 lmfao
@@your_average_cultured_dude na actually u see pictures going by before 24 and after 24 it's a video but not very smooth
"Your computer is pathetic"
Computer : and I took it personally
"Your computer is pathetic"
"Crys in poor"
Just imagine the game that will bring the 9090 to its knees
probably nothing. at that point, Better cards would be for more intense things like video editing and rendering and intense mathematical equations
no game company will invest more time in more realistic visualy
Probably FIFA or Fortnite. With magnificent 19% gpu utilization peaks. I swear optimization is not devs' priority anymore. The game only needs to run up to the part where you upload your credit card info
@@JGaute lmao the truest words ever spoken
@@JGaute a prime example for good optimization is Doom eternal and atomic heart
Dawg my computer can't even run Ms paint without being noisy💀
I'm sure your computer will be fine for cyberpunk at 4k with path tracing 💀💀💀
Let’s see what happens when you run it on a chromebook
@@gamingwill896-1 will to live and +1 fire hazard
How about rtx 9090 ti sli
My old laptop fans would be at 100 percent at the desktop after multiple reboots as well like factory resets 💀
"Performance is low"
"Someone in the future just has 5 RTX gpu running with the best coolers"
The rtx 5090 laughing in the background
They basically went "ah fuck it, let's become the modern crysis"
Lol
Crysis 4 is lurking in the corner waiting to attack
@@soundwavesuperior6761 eh, they optimized it a lot. It's slow because it has full-on path tracing now, which is a feature that's arguably ahead of this generation of hardware's time.
@@soundwavesuperior6761 Crysis tried to be ahead of it's time, but it chose the wrong timeline. It focused more on singe core CPU performance, which didn't turn out to be where the technology really went.
Cyberpunk RT overdrive will be plays le at 30 fps within a decade or so.
im just here, with integrated graphics, not worrying bout sh*t.
I am here with a discrete GPU... That's worse than integrated graphics😢. Meet the mx350, even my iris xe can outperform it.
@@Arsoonist you can't deny the MX160 i have IS worse than urs, man i love spending money on GPUs that my integrated GPU does better when using longevity gaming cuz it doesn't take that much RAM to process (mx160 takes 4gb of ram from ur pc) and i can play fairly smoothly in many games
@@lywoh I mean yeah, it would give me very good fps, unless it was cooled with a single fan the size of one of my balls(my balls ain't massive, the fan is small). It does better in the first 10 sec only to throttle and perform shit, so I can't even properly use it.
@@Arsoonist bro same, except I have the mx330 which is *barely* faster than the integrated iris plus graphic. I have another laptop with an mx550 which is sort of a decent chip
And I’m here with Intel UHD Graphics 620.
“You’re pc is pathetic”
Me and my gaming laptop with a gtx 2050
same here, mine is rtx
@@zenox1164 yeah that’s mb I meant rtx not gtx 😭
I have intel hd 3000...
@@Unemployedweeb69420 same 💀 i do get 90+ fps in Minecraft 1.16.5 though although that might be because I'm on windows 7
Your Computer Is Pathetic: My Intel Atom First Generation “I think I understand 💀”
Bro probably can't even watch a TH-cam video at 3 fps 144p 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Crysis back in 2007: Finally. A worthy foe
Bro i used to hear that meme back good days
Can it run crysis?
Yeah, but can an android phone run carx street smoothly
an android managed to run crysis 3 at 18 fps
@@user-zt4nk6ec2w Oneplus 6t managed to run Crysis 3 at that performance. Poco f1 performs slower.
Nvidia made its own monster called RT and also made its own hero named DLSS😮😮
Actually kind true.. They know if they were just competing on plain rasteurization, they would lose every single time vs AMD. They had to manufacture their own problem to fix.
@@asd-dr9cf AMD did the same with their FSR, but FSR can work even with NVIDIA GPUs, meanwhile AMD GPUs don't work with DLSS
@@asd-dr9cfthis is beyond false. They under that we can no longer just keep is using Rasterization. Also hardware RT was not started by Nvidia they just made it possible to do. The gaming industry had already been on the raytracing train years before the 20 series was a thing. If Nvidia still wanted to do Rasterization they'd still blow the competition out but what's the point of keeping on with Rasterization I'd it isn't actually going to make different rendering techniques useful?? Everyone says they had to manufacture their on problem yet the only GPU manufacturer doing this dies off and for years after the 20 series everyone has being following Nvidia's wake and are still losing to Nvidia.
@MrTasos64no you don't understand a damn thing about the rendering techniques being used. Path tracing a game and doing it efficiently in real time is taxing. These technologies are taxing because they are being done in real time unlike the cinematic field were they render in clusters and not in realtime.
@@blvckl0tcs750you are wrong... almost across the board.
So what's a good computer by comparison? Enlighten me. This is one of the most enraging shorts.
Like:"your Ferrari is pathetic, it can't even come close to pulling 1200mph"
Sooooooo what can?
He's obviously saying every gamer needs to buy a quantum computer.
To put it into a simplistic answer, the only step over consumer grade 4090s, is the professional line of workstation gpus that are used to actually create and render the latest innovations in graphics tech. Which would be like the Ada gen RTX 4000 all the way up to the RTX 6000. So essentially there is no “better” computer to compare it to, because you’d be taking the leap from consumer grade flagship gaming hardware, to professional grade creator hardware.
In terms of current consumer components there isn't one. Maybe the 5090 when it eventually becomes a thing it'll be able to manage 30fps but we'll have to see
@@TyrannisVirtueкстати, квантовый компьютер это scam. Погугли разоблачение этой темы
My core 2 duo: Stop! I know that already
I work with Unreal and to render a 1920x1080 with path tracing it takes about 90 seconds with a RTX 3060. So, I'd say 18fps with Path Tracing is insanely fast...
Gonna be wild when we can render 3840x2160 at 240fps with path tracing. It'll probably be the year 2045, but we'll get there eventually.
@@JeffreyBolesat that point we could probably get path tracing vr
@@JeffreyBolesthat'll never happen properly, we can't get super small in transistors and stuff so unless it's a kilowatt or something and costs $5000
From seconds per frame to frames per second, we have come a long way and still have a long way to go
You have a job that many of us dream of having. Congratulations and all the best in your career my friend 😊
as a blender user, this is really impressive
I'm a blender user too, and I definitely agree with you!
@@mrlightwriter do you 2 think the 3080 could do the same cause this is what I have and I am coming from AMD graphic card. Still getting use to blender and UE5.3
As a fellow blender user, i dont know what this all means or what it has to do with blenders. Well, off to make a fruit shake
As someone who has completed the basic tutorial for blender, I can say I agree.
as someone that installed blender to make a donut and half and never opened it after, i agree
Let me just spend a couple million to integrate the James Web Space Telescope inside of my PC, then we will see who’s pathetic!
This just made NVIDIA the only one pathetic in the room. It's them that failed to deliver.
my Chromebook: I am not pathetic I am a being stuck in time and space that refuses to progress, I am a bastion, a fortress, a stronghold! against the new
@Pleyer7575 my chromebook is beyond potatos
Same with mine
@@Ice_elite baked potato
This is a beautiful comment
Good potato
The fact it runs even at 18Fps is INSANE. when graphics cards get good enough we will be in for a treat
Indeed; people don't know how long it takes to render a single image in Unreal with path tracing.
Our wallets will disagree with that notion
@@mrlightwriter it's different from ray tracing right.
I mean gpu are already so good.of course standards of people change and actually if you compare any top of the line graphic card to something it can't achieve of course it will look pathetic .it's like comparing a millionaire to a. Billionaire.doesnt means the. Millionaire isn't good .just means we got a high standards for judgements . My
@@Xenor999 rtx is the buzzword nvidia came up with as to not call it "path tracing" but is a scaled down version of path-tracing intended to make realtime "raytracing" possible, path tracing is the whole shabang that renderengines like Cycles,Vray, ETC use to make animations and photorealistic renders.
"you're computer is pathetic "
Me with amd a6 128mb video card and 4 gb ram
Digital Storm dual 4090 GPU setup: “You haven’t seen what he’s even capable of”.
Leave my computer alone, he’s trying his best
Are u sure that your laptop is not transgender
@@terra3673No I'm sure he's normal 😂
@@scrap5407 Thanks for clearing it up for the less intelligent ones that transgender is indeed normal, we need more of that!
@@iamyourgreatgreatgreatgrea6291 lol
A guy with a render farm: You don't know who you are messing with
Me with a nasa supercomputer: alien technology is nothing compared to this
“Your computers pathetic even if you have the 2000 dollar rtx 4090”
4090 matrix : am i a joke to you?
Duke dodge challenger black ghost:am I a joke to you
Bro my computer is pathetic, it barely runs the log in screen without crashing
Even tho I have 5600G right now, I was there too. Ofc not with 5600G but with one of the old PCs that I had back in the day
Get more ram
Use an OS that uses less ram
Lol, mine barely runs the windows startup logo
@@a_plastic_baglike arch :3
**Traces every electromagnetic radiation's paths**
I’m running an i7 3770 ang GT 620 1 gb model. Oh no! I never would’ve guessed my pc is garbage
"Your computer is pathetic"
*Proceeds to show a litteral potato*
My computer that can't even run minecraft :🗿
Try play Alpha
To be fair Minecraft isn't the best optimized game. I have an RTX 3050 16gb and it can run most modern games at over 100fps and the crazy thing is I bought it for only $700 off Amazon.
@@fireballmafia4833 Ain't no way bro 700 bucks only , Send me that shit I'll pay 800 dollars
@@fireballmafia4833Sodium:🗿
@@fireballmafia4833You spent 700 on that
Me with laptop equiped with I5-8250U and UHD 620 integrated grapychs:
Aw man! Now im fucked
Ayy my laptop has the same specs!
@@ryanjames2247 is it dell?
Me with iris xe, oh no.... Anyways
@@LAYATORS nah, its a lenovo
Bro I had even worse. A4 6300 dual core CPU, GT 710 2GB and 6GB RAM. What a crap that was! At least, I had fun time playing San Andreas, CS 1.6, etc
“Your computer is pathetic”
My laptop: Im tired boss
Me: You are my strongest soldier
"Your computer is pathetic"
Yea, thanks I know that
“Your computer’s pathetic” Jokes on you I don’t have a computer!!
Well you do, it’s your phone
Thats not even related @danzstuff
@@Nexosist Yeah it is, a phone is basically a mini computer, it has all the stuff you would find in a computer
@@danzstuff can you play csgo?
On it
@@Nexosist that's not related, but the iphone can run a bunch of high quality games, plus if csgo DOES get phone support, yes it probably would be able to play csgo
"Your computer is pathetic!"
"i know 😢"
Me with my 2012 thinkpad laptop:
Don’t worry buddy, I still love you
*me with my 100 dollar laptop* yeah I think I just stopped existing after this video
When I attempt diy but forget I'm poor😅
Fr
Me with a gt 1030 chillin:
lmao same
Poor guy😢, I’ll buy you a water bottle 😊
Me with Intel UHD 630 : This is fine 🙂👍
put this guy in jail
(I don’t know computers well) about 2 years ago I got a 3060 and never realized the fans weren’t moveing and now I don know how to make them spin PLEASE HELP
Minecraft distant horizons, maximum shaders, 4k, 4096x texturepack with normal map: hold my beer
"Your chemistry knowledge is garbage, your can't even recreate the big bang!"
Obviously it’s a test and the fact that the 4090 can even get 18 FPS is amazing. We are far from native path tracing. But they are trying to show how DLSS can help improve performance
quality DLSS looks better and performs better than native anyways so i don't get why theres an issue
@@klippo1235 If you have a 144hz monitor and your 4090 is only putting out 115fps, then it's a waste of money and is indeed pathetc. With a 144hz monitor, you expect to see an expensive flagship card do 144fps.
@@luminatrixfanfiction like people surely did with crysis on new hardware at that time? lol. The red engine is extremely poorly optimized and games are getting more advnanced than our hardware, thus. DLSS
As a 3D Artist I agree, even 1-2fps for 100% PT is awesome especially in such complex game world. Normally the RTX 4090 still can take minutes and more ( 0.016fps if 1min ) to clean single 1080p frame using normal Path Tracing.
But what sense does a test make if noone is going to use it because of it's absolutely underwhelming performance?
"IF I DON'T HAVE AT LEAST 1000FPS THE GAME IS LITERALLY UNPLAYABLE"
Edit: yall it was a joke stop getting angry🥶
yes 👍 👍 👍
Fortnite players 🙂
CSGO players:
18 fps is unplayable
18 fps is very low.
I'd rather have smooth framerates over some subtle lighting effects anyday. This is why I like indie games and older games, 60+ FPS fulltime with zero hitches on many of those games.
My GTX 1660 agreed silently in the adjacent room
I can't even imagine how scarily good computers will be in 10 years.
literally anyone who works or plays with cgi tools would know how much more demanding path tracing is over the hybrid approach nvidia was using
Amen.
“Your computer’s pathetic”
*me with my laptop that sounds like Armageddon when I boot up Minecraft* 🗿
My laptop is melting even thinking about that
Me with my potato made from 12 year old spare parts:
i have one like these week ago noe buyed 1660 super and i5 10400f
If only they actually made Cyberpunk a better game instead of using it as a graphic test bench.
i heard it ain’t that bad these days tbh
Oh look, yet another persona who's never actually touched the game
@@CitrusRev I competed game few times and it's still bad. Cope.
Its a pretty good game imo
It’s okay but the amount of expectation from me really left a sour taste, I also think the game should be better instead of being a “graphics bench”. Beautiful game but everything else is ehhh
NASA with their super computers: you sureeeee?
Meanwhile my pc crashing while opening minecraft:
I can only imagine How things would look when we can use path tracing in vr with the megaRTX 69420 one of these days.
Yes all this running on my intel i56 500 core CPU, all powered by a nuclear reactor, with 1000 petabytes of gayddr9 ram. I'm excited for the future !
@@superyura6457 gay?🤣
@@mudit1i think hes making fun of the rgb lmao
“Your computer is pathetic because it can’t run an extremely demanding feature that just came out”
Yeah, sounds about right
Yeah, that's a pretty good take on his part🙄
"Your computer is pathetic because it can't withstand the force of 500 megatons of TNT"
What will it take for the Gpu to run that?
Well, it sounds like he's saying that your computer sucks because a 4090 can't run cyberpunk over 30 fps without having some RT Overdrive/DLSS feature turned on. Yet makes says the opposite saying that not a lot of computers can use said new feature. Confusing
The 'performance hit' is from, at least in the sample, the previous lighting system running on a 4090, not from the updated lighting.
"Your computer is pathetic"
me on my computer that runs on gas 💀
Me and my 50$ computer rn💀💀💀💀💀
At least it's not ordinary potato.
It's sweet potato PC ! Let's go!!!
Bro, I’m over here working with my goddamn school computer, I know it ain’t shit
My pc : what's rtx ?
Frr like I’m so confused
me with my antikythera mechanism: 🗿🗿🗿
I watched it 3 times and couldn't make sense of what he means.
Update : 4th time and I'm having seizure
Relatable
I'm still rocking a 1070ti and 4690k. My CPU's architecture is almost 10 years old.... I need an upgrade.
Still running a 4790k myself, but with a 6700XT 😅 I will upgrade the CPU next at some point but it works well at the moment
I also have 4690k. But today of tomorrow will be its last day as I'm upgrading to 7800X3D
@@ivvan497 I think I may go for a 7800x as I like to play with overclocking every now and then, I did consider the x3d though, solid CPU for gaming
@@dynamitedaviesThere is no 7800X
@@casnub5484 sorry I didn't make it clear enough, I meant 5800x3d Vs 7800x3d.
"Your computer's pathetic" Matches my life bro. 😎
My computer: Jokes on you the best I can do is 60hz and I have no storage!
Man my laptop's fans are already revving up just by watching this video
actually it's impressive that it's still giving 18 FPS in Path Tracing seriously
It’s at 60fps now. I just tried it and it’s giving me solid 60. I think it’s just optimization
@@DavyDave1313it’s pretty new to the consumer market, it’s looking more promising
"Your computer is pathetic" yeah, you dont have to remind me
A whole motherboard inside a sweet potato 😂😂😂
Ah shit, my integrated gen 7 intel Core i7 on a laptop with a broken fan and cracked screen can’t run Cyberpunk on the highest settings? This is a fucking tragedy.
This turned out to be the biggest memed on game ever
"Your computer's pathetic"
My laptop: I know
"Your computer is pathetic"
People watching this in 2077 running cyberpunk at 9000 fps: 🗿🗿🗿
My school computer can barely run Doom, you know it’s gonna boot up this game and go “fuck it, I’m dead.”
Your school computer isn't a Chromebook?
@@fortnite.burger no, we have these rubbish fixed PCs all over the school. We also have Dell laptops but they're not much better either lol
@@TrulySoviet2436 oof
still waiting for the 5080 TI
Still waiting for the 6080 TI
Probably going to be waiting another 2 years...maybe even 3 lol
That potato could probably run doom
I know they always use full res textures and high polygon models with no nanite or any other sort of trick, but it takes literal hours to render a single frame of a Pixar movie. 55ms is simply amazing
that graphical feature is a DX13 standard feature, so seeing this in a DX12 game truly means the next physics platform is going to revolutionize the graphical quality of games. very good news for gamers.
... unless they prefer having better story in their games than graphics 💀
@@k1lez ?, you don't sacrifice one part of a game for another part unless its an indie game. Triple A studios have legions of employees dedicated to the story, "graphics", and programming of the game that work in unison but independently of each other. Whether or not the storyboard is good has nothing to do with the guys working on the 3d models and texturing.
*Left graphic setting gamer laughs in pixel
“Your Computer is Pathetic”
Don’t you dare insult my Gtx 1060 6gb like that
“My grandpas pc has no pathetic parts, kaiba!”
It's really weird everyone thinks a GPU is the only thing that can impact your FPS. Your CPU and RAM and Motherboard matter A LOT to this process. Especially in heavily multi threaded games like Cyberpunk.
"Motherboard" lmao. Please delete that before someone roasts you.
@@Salvo78106oh you think motherboards can't be a bottle neck? Out a 3900x in a b550 board and come back to us.
Eh, I don't think the pathtracing and graphics stuff is running on the cpu. yeah mobo might matter for pcie speed. The higher res you go and the more graphics options you enable, the more it relies on the graphics card. But yeah the other stuff matters too. I don't really care about fps past 120 or 60 depending on the game, as long as it doesn't stutter.
Higher res images and rt is all done on the GPU. All that happens on the mb and CPU is arranging those images in way you can see. And even then modern changes to that pipeline try to limit the back and forth between the CPU and GPU. So you would be wrong. Now if you want more fps and less res then the story is different and the bottleneck can become your CPU though I believe there is a bigger push for latency reduction rather than higher fps. So it just depends on what you play.
I might not be an expert but i dont think Ray tracing and path tracing has anything to do with cpu.
"Game developers not doing their job"
This guy: Your PC is pathetic!
"Absolutely gorgeous" matter of taste, I'm perfectly fine without it
Give it to me then lmao
thanks for reminding us that upgrading with each new generation is BS. Also, nice loop man!
"your computers pathetic"
Haha yes😢
Not mine tho😎
My wallet: 💀
“Your computer is pathetic”
I know but I don't need a reminder
I've not seen a short loop this perfectly.