New Changes Announced: Dynamic BRs, FOX-3, Crew Healing And QOL changes
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ค. 2024
- My personal Discount Code: store.gaijin.net/catalog.php?...
Full post: forum.warthunder.com/t/cm-cov...
Discord: / discord
Outro Music: A.N.O. - Vanish
------------------------------------------
It's not necessary but always appreciated, all donated money will be there to improve quality and frequency of my content.
------------------------------------------
Patreon: / defyn
Merch: defyn-shop.fourthwall.com/en-...
Donations: www.paypal.me/DEFYNWT - เกม
![ทททททททท #27 [หลุยส์ เค โตมายังไง ณ สระบุรี]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CaKoYw_Xmtg/mqdefault.jpg)
I am aware that the 3 crew member thing is just the number of crew lol just forgor
For too long I cant read users:
News from Community Managers
Fix for Mig23/27 sustained turn, fix for PLZ-83 incorrect visual tracks, new BEE7 shells for PLZ-83, fix for LITENING II resolution on F-16C, AV8B Plus and Barak
CMs are aware of feedback on number of players in air battles, devs are planning something.
Dev blogs soon
Next vehicle event will be a tank
Research Bonuses delayed after the update arrives
Different BRs for different gamemodes is almost done (BIG)
New ''drag n' drop'' crew slots
New internal modules for tanks in next update
Automatic healing of ground crew looks like it is done and the game will show you when they are healing
New visual weapons selector hotbar similar to secondary weapons menu in the hangar
Keep an eye on next Roadmap
(thanks metra)
Metra la cabra 🐐
El cabrón 🐐
@@Metrallaroja is a man con two cojones
Hey @Defyn, when is this update going to be released?
also, from the CM replies down in comments separate counter measure controls are confirmed on track for next update, and also there was a comment from smin in another thread a couple hours before that new thread was created that did not deny changes to multipathing with fox3 update (as they have every time in the past) and also inferred they may address multipathing in this new CM news thread later.
Thank you Defyn for ending my edging streak❤
nah
Quit gooning. >:(
Da fuq happened to your face?
Too many g’s
Wtf is blud yapping about
can't wait for the T-80 tank that cosplayes as a shed to be an event vehicle
the blyatmobile premium pack
One wishes but I doubt they'll do something like that. They claim to avoid politics but chose to put china and Isreal in the game.
It would be hilarious, a t-80 reduced to the same capabilities as a casemate tank
@@shawn7889Israel’s addition has zero political implications, people just hate seeing it anywhere at all. China has Taiwanese tanks and planes bc of the old Chinese market that got shut down.
Israel just existing in game isn’t a political statement, and stop trying to make it one
Cope, NATOtard
cant wait for some AIM-120 16 vs 16
lower the player count in matches PLEASE
Altitude! Altitude! Pull up! simulator
it was ridiculous on the dev server
air rb would actually be so much fun if it wasn't a 20 v 20 missile spam simulator
Hes not gayjin @@moosethegoose8024
interesting changes. as someone who's highest tiered plane is 4.3, this will affect me greatly.
Dynamic BRs might affect you at 4.3 if the wyvern goes back to 4.0 xD
@Fuzeha lord help me I forgot about that rat. But I mostly play sim TBH, and wyvern spam isn't as bad there.
@@rocketcello5354 absolute gigachad you are. My complete and full respect.
@vemorphose1167
Cheers, but I'm pretty crap rn. I just fly medium bombers like a rat about 100m off the deck and that works somehow.
You’d be surprised 100 hours ago (that I may or may not have done in 2 weeks) I was at around 4.0
2:58
But you know, free RP is always a gu
- Defyn, 2024
quote of the year
@@WillWasHere602 One of the quotes of all time.
Censored by Gaijin Political Officer
@@jagdadler213 lmfao
new response just dropped
Dynamic BR had me clicking on this video faster than anything else
5:29 discord jumpscare
I'm genuinely waiting for air sim to get some work. Having a sim function to be able to fly helicopters in would be relatively nice, since all there is currently is ground sim, which would have to be in the constraints of the Br change per however many days, or to fly Helicopter EC, which is arcade and severely unrealistic. Just my two cents.
Air Sim used to have bots in Helis and I always wanted to fly a heli too
Sim overall needs work, it could be so much better and dynamic but it's pretty weak currently. I want Sam batteries to engage in my f105 etc, or being able to bring helis into air sim to work on cash would be amazing
@shitpost4204 Would be nice to have Sam sites and such you have to fight through and defeat. i know i'm asking a lot for gaijin, but i guess i'm spoiled a bit by dcs. I know i'll get flak about wanting similarities, but it would make the whole dynamic change for the better imo.
Dynamic BRs scare me.
It'll either be an amazing addition for both ground and air RB or a bullet in the back of the head of low-mid tier jet gameplay.
Dynamic BR would make sense with either it being affected by stock or spaded vehicle or the modules.
@@FabianDialer-vw1zk11.3 stock f16 ☠️
i can guarantee you it will be horrendous. Look at how BRs are balanced now, look at how terrible shit is; just look at the US tree and all its over-br'd shit.. and we think Gaijin is competent enough to be doing +50% as many BR choices?
@@fire_drake12.arc.24 U.S Tree and over BR'd? You're smokin crack dawg 🤣🤣🤣
@@princekasper3328 Truly is someone smoking some good stuff.
And thats coming from someone using capture/lend lease stuff
10:17 “we fix 20 bugs then implement 15” LMAO
I appreciate you not making everything ranty and depressing. As a newer player it’s so disheartening watching content creators just constantly shit on everything that you’re trying to enjoy. Same reasons I avoid reviews before watching movies these days, rather go into it with my own enjoyment than let others saltiness ruin the experience
Research Bonuses delayed after the update arrives (IDK how difficult it is to give discounts to other nations similar/copy paste vehicles... SMH)
new visual weapons selector hotbar similar to secondary weapons menu in the hangar (what does this mean exactly, i don't get it)
they can't develop it because that would require them to take developers off of the team that designs premiums
Its probably for money reason.
New updates new shiny toy to grind or people willing to GE them to skip it.
Monetary reasons, no reason they can't just give something like a +15/20% research bonus to nations where you don't have rank 6-8 unlocked yet. They can't hide they will lose a bit of income from people using GE to skip the grind for these nations because they have already played the same copy-paste vehicles in a different tree.
Anyone else think they could add another mode where the matches play like sim. But using the flight mechanics of realistic.
It would be fun, but matchmake times would go up too much for them
so just "Enduring Confrontation"? We actually had this years ago and it was awesome (but abuseable). I'd love to have it back (esspecially with modern jets) since it gives everybody something to do besides TDM.
pretty sure the flight mechanics of sim and Realistic are the same besides one allowing mouse aim. You can get the same experience (besides having markers) buy just using a flight stick and first person in realistic. The only time the models are different to my knowledge is Arcade. The whole point of Realistic is to have the same physics and performance as Simulator but with the controllability of Arcade. The only thing i think needs changing is in GRB the gunner sight needs to be forced from the actual gunner sight, and ARB needs to have no enemy markers or multiple respawns and larger maps.
@@fire_drake12.arc.24 actually the flightmechanics are slightly simplified in RB compared to SIM. The instructor in RB prevents you from actually pushing your airframe over the edge and forcing a stall for example (if you use mouse-aim). This wasn't always the case but was introduced when RB became more popular and a lot of people transitioning from AB stalled (and crashed) because of that. But yeah, you're right that you can get around the instructor by using Smi-controls
@@fire_drake12.arc.24 The problem is, your enemy is using mouse aim so you're probably at a disadvantage unless you're a god
The A-10 can already see plenty of planes without flares, and they are somehow going to make it worse
This one pisses me off, I JUST finished getting out of 9.3-10.3 and when I was flying the 9.3 planes I had to treat the a-10 like the plague
@@Baluuga Man I'm playing france 9.0 rn, it's literally impossible to do anything because turning makes you loose 3/4 of your speed and you don't get flares up until 10.3
@@irithylloldman6526 kind of a baindaid fix but i noticed that a10 tend to fly low so i go high and fly in front of the sun when i target them to have the best chance at tricking their missile
Actually super Etendard has flare at 10.0 and it actually has some damn good retention@@irithylloldman6526
@@irithylloldman6526I think 8.0-10.0 France air has to be some of the most intense suffering in the game.
i think it would be cool to get fuel tankers as ai objectives and/or awacs to help diversify objective direction and player incentive for action
because bombing a base isn't really objective in the normal sense, it benefits only the bomber and has no effect whatsoever on the game at toptier
There definitely needs to be Objectives, something to defend, something to destroy. Maybe 8 players max as two flights are tasked with different objectives.
Like ARB has been the same since I started playing and that was over a decade ago.
Example: One team has to destroy a AWACS, the other team has been tasked to defend it, and counter attack. Not saying this idea verbatim they can figure out the actual implementation but something needs to change.
There are objectives in operations. Certain targets that need to be destroyed or defended. Like a flight of bombers or a convoy.
It just doesn't show up on the smaller maps.
@@Patrick-zr8tv Right, but is it worth it? There may be objectives but nothing changes. It’s “Go left, Low, and then get shot down by someone you never saw. “.
@@Patrick-zr8tv those also dont affect the game at all
100% agree with the tickets, it needs a rework
‘Planes like the Gripen are going to get a massive buff’ I swear bro the Swedish players are so coddled it’s insane.
People’s opinion on who’s handheld and who suffers literally changes patch to patch. As it is Sweden right now has the best MBT’s and some of the best light tanks. It also has the best Fighter in the game.
I remember when people would say Sweden suffers all the damn time even after getting the 2A6 in the sub-tree. Then it seems the players shut the hell up when the new STRV-122B came out and they added spall liners. Then there’s the gripen as well.
Russia still has the best light tanks (debatably), CAS and SPAA. Only thing stopping Sweden from ruining the matchmaking is the fact it’s a minor nation with a significantly smaller playerbase
Bro so many swedish planes are "meh" at best what are you on about
@@h3069 apparently the Gripen doesn’t exist. The planes are meh? I play Sweden and the J-29 is good, J-35 is good and the J-21R is incredible in GRB and Air.
Sure some of the planes are meh but it’s no Great Britain. It actually has a decent number of meta planes
@@ICECAPPEDSKY Russia has best CAS??? Sweden is handheld since forever.
@ICECAPPEDSKY I only main Swedish air but I'm only up to the j35, but like cmon man there are some real stinkers in here you have to admit.
You can do really good in them
if you lock in but meta? Maybe top tier idk
After stepping away from WT for like half a year and now coming back, I have to say that QoL changes are fantastic recently. Maybe its because I just went from Tarkov 💀
I be like that Lmao. The grass is always greener until it’s not.
Had a similar experience where I stopped playing warthunder as actively, got my daily logins and played a couple games every other day maybe. I was busy playing other games and companies just ruin the other games.
Gaijin may have a lot of issues that people bitch about, but they are the lesser of two evils most of the time in comparison to triple A studios and indie studios published by triple A studios.
Rip Helldivers 2, Tarkov and other shit
I've been less active since Arena Breakout opened its beta too. Been mostly playing that and barely touched WT
2v2 or 4v4 on a very large map would be cool. Players would have to implement cranks, notches, going cold and stuff like that and pushing to the merge would result in prolonged dogfights. Another idea could be adding radar installations instead of bases. Interceptors are vectored towards targets using radio and later datalink (this would finally distinguish the mig-21's from each other), these radars can be destroyed of course, adding interdictor and SEAD gameplay. It might not be realistic to implement, but it is a fun idea.
Good ideas, let's see if the implementation of these will be as poor as usual
it will be
oh great lord of the ME163
probably xddd
Wow! Thank you for updating us man you are the first❤️👍
As u said, unless they change multipathig, nothing will really change.
What is multipathing
@@woutervanheusdenI have no idea
@@woutervanheusden it's tracking targets at low altitude
They're not fixing spawncamping, the worst thing in WT.
7:40 ...and the Barak Obama *breathes* has been worked on, when it gets changed...
7:39 lmao - Yeah I also fancy calling it like that.
damn i was really looking forward to the a5m4 kfir canard plane
Defyn i love you’re content. Keep the good work up💯🔥❤️🔥
Totally agree with tickets rework had a match on the weekend with games in bed on the other team in an F-84G made one run along our ground targets strafing all the howitzers coz they are all lined in a straight line for you in the middle of the map before any of us could get there and took about 35 to 40 percent of our tickets in that one run
It has to be removed from air RB, not reworked
That’s stupid that an AIR-TO-AIR battle can end with 50+% of players being alive because of one guy in the A-10 or something who pressed one button 10 times to kill bots on the ground that don’t even move and did literally nothing for the team
Or even more ridiculous situation - the lobbie is full of fighters and the match ends because of some AI killed another AI lmao
So here’re 2 options - reduce reward for ground targets by let’s say 10 times so those bots in A-10’s, F-4S’s etc will have to play as fighters(Kfir, F-4S) or don’t play ARB in certain vehicles (Su-25, A-10)
Or remove tickets from ARB and add limiter for amount of planes with air-to-ground stuff as they did with bombers
So let’s say 4 planes with bombs/AGM’s/rockets per team that will also fix 11.0-12.0 bracket cause rn every single match is 80% filled with bots in F-4S’s who go straight to the nearest base, drop bombs and then crash or go to the field to repeat this cycle
7:50 This can mean either one of a few things:
A: They’re gonna do a bit of trolling, remove the whole game from PS4, and give us 128 player lobbies.
B: They’re actually going to decrease the team sizes, thank god.
C: They’re gonna ignore us completely.
D: All of the above.
9:20 probably that. Even if hugging the deck is only of limited use against newer FOX 3 missiles.
I think it’s more likely strike aircraft will have a BR lower than they currently do in ground but stay the same for air
I think fox 3 are going to be a bit of a pros and cons thing but in general a good thing i think. I hope the way they implement it there is a bit of that DCS BVR guesswork. Estimating missile range etc. That would potentially make it better to be skilled with while bad players will fire them all as soon as they can and not reach (or not defend). It depends a lot on how it will be working with the lofting and range and specific models they add.
Currently some of the missiles don't quite perform right, especially the phoenix i believe would have way more range in real life then in game? i have tested it and it doesn't seem to be able to hit anything further then 40 at best 50km away from the launch point (and this is at high altitude and high speed, like 12km close to mach 2 or something like that i tested). Sparrow 7M does about 20-30km (can get a lucky shot further but its usually not very realistic to hit). Aim9M does max 10km (and this is shot from higher altitude then target at high speed)
Those ranges are all distance travelled by the missile before it goes below mach 1.2-1.5 or so when the missile gets slower then that it might still get a lucky hit but it would be very easily dodged below mach 1 or just outran. (this means if the guy is flying towards you you have more range, flying away from you it will have much less range)
9:36 I think it would depend on how they would add the fox-3's on the Gripen. Currently you can't have the bol-pods and rb71's on the same pylons and I think they are going to keep it that way with fox-3's as well. Tho I wouldn't be suprised if people would put the fox-3's on the wing tip pylons and aim-9m's with bol-pods under the wings.
awwww. I was really hoping by "dynamic BRs" they meant the BR would change based on what modifications you had unlocked/equipped. Probably much harder to implement, but as we all know a stock plane/tank has a VERY DIFFERENT capability from a spaded one.
Oooh yeah
I got the F104J - and it is nearly impossibly to play while stock
Even when spaded its just fire-power, can totally get outrun at that br, no flares to dodge 20g missiles ugh
That would be perfect, like for props it is not that much of a problem, but a stock (f104j for example) and a spaded plane is so much different
Can’t wait for the ground pounding all aspect slingers versing my Italian line up that have no flares
I'm hoping the automatic healing works like repairs. no need to trigger it but after a bit the crew bandage themselves. brings the health back up to yellow or something, they're still beat up but not full blow tomato anymore. no infinite health crews if you only hurt em a little bit every few minutes
Early jets are really frustrating rn due to those a-10s
AMEN BROTHER PREACH!
I couldn’t even edge to this video defyn, I exploded immediately, cleanup on aisle my cockpit
that endcard music kinda hurted my ears but thank you for the input. lots of smol qol :) defynitly needed.
I'm really hoping the separate BRs for air-ground and air-air means the air BRs will get their cap increased by a lot eventually. Air match making is much more compressed than ground.
Also of course agreed on the A-10. Honestly certain missiles should just have a minimum BR rating. Maybe make it so if you have them equipped, your BR goes up.
Idk where the A-10 might go down sentiment comes from. Its way worse in grb with the extreme inconsistency of mavericks and the awful scope of 65D.
they've always had different br's depending on arcade realistic or sim, how hard was it to change the br's for ground and air as well? it's a good change but it's so late it makes me pissed they couldn't have done this ages ago
I’d love to see a TH-cam series from war thunder where the devs have to play a match to two in a vehicle of the player bases choice. I reckon it would be pretty eye opening for them..
wait the 2s38 wasnt made out of air irl cnat belive that
Nice Dutch camo for the F-16
For air mains, the 2s38's damage model would be like a jet being able to consistently eat any missile and survive
Any Russian SU-25 model acting like a better A-10 tanking proxy rounds and missiles😂
@DEFYN could we possibly see more squad or wingman content? I’m looking to get into war thunder but I’m slightly more passive so I’d love to see you flying alongside others and showing off tactics
I mean im excited simply for them to hopefully fix the br compression on the daily air assault. You have 6.7br planes like the f80 competing for kills against the f16c i get the points are prorated to give you higher points/kill the weaker br you are. But legit my last match it had 6 12+ br planes in it. Each able to launch up to 6 or more all aspect bvr missiles so thats 36 kills they get per merge assuming all of them hit. Doesnt leave much room for gun kills i was in a f5e during this last match and simply couldnt compete. Bvr planes should be seperated from the game mode. Or they just get rid of aam in that game mode so everyone needs gun kills. Maybe break it up by plane speed as well. Thats the only match i regularly play as u can get on. Play the plane youve been struggling to unlock mods on. And get 5-10k mod points per match
They are creating a game mode for airRB that includes SEAD and larger engagement maps with multiple spawns. This is why they are not modifying the current player counts, and what they are referring to here.
6:26 it’s defyn so I’m not surprised but i nearly spat my drink
so i come back to my device, and think, it'd be cool for DEFYN to post right about now. lo and behold: *discord ping*
I hope the br changes for ground rb will be like if they have smart or guided weapons wthay will go up in br for ground rb and sthey the same br in air rb
Remember: BVVD himself said they couldn't separate flare and chaff because of spaghetti code issues.
And given Gaijin's history of "fix 10 bugs, 10 new pop up" I tend to believe them when they say there's "underestimated complexity".
that discord disconnect sound made me check my DS
I just wish I could research helis with aircraft, don't really wanna grind tanks to do that since I have more progress in planes. I mean we can unlock helis with aircraft so why not?
I also wish they would remove crew training costs since they're letting us drag & drop them around, but I know that would never happen either. Planes need modeled internals too.
‘Be sure to get involved’ is probably the funniest thing gaijin said
DEFYN uploads don't halt this gooner
they should add a shop for convertible rp, had tons of it already... accumulated that thing since 2016
imho it's more likely that ground attackers with all aspect misisles will go uo in br, becoming virtually useless in air rb. Which makes sense really, since air rb is a glorified deathmatch. if you want to use those planes to the fullest you'll have to play tanks or EC.
As for event tank I would like to see the US atomic tank, what is it called? VT something? It’s long time since the obj and is7
As somebody whos highest plane is the p-51c-10, this is extremely important to my gameplay and may even ruin my war thunder experience.
Gaijin should focus on adding 3 versions of each vehicle for major updates. Then use events to supplement additional versions. Count them as one vehicle if they want. Most of the time it’s just adding the same model with additional weapon options. I can’t even lie about wanting a full 1.0 gap in BR between F4 Phantoms and the F-14B. Fill in the top tier gaps with every nation with the next 2 major updates. Israel doesn’t have much. Dig deep in historical data and pull prototypes from archives and put them in. Focus on adding heavy tanks/prototype heavy tanks to every nation that doesn’t have them.
So I wanna know will the gripen be able to carry fox 3 with the flares pods because it can't with the current rader missles
I’m 90% sure it can’t carry the BOL pods and fox 3s
Very good the direction they are heading. I hope lobbies get smaller. I think Gaijin needs to rethink arcade battles in top tier. Instead of having normal air arcade battles which I assume nobody plays at top tier, give us a game mode with super small lobbies of 8v8 or even 6v6 with realistic game engine, using arcade maps with limited number of air spawn (for example 3 spawns) but without shooting markers like in normal air arcade. Most planes at higher ranks have radar guns and ballistic computers, more over most killing happens with missiles anyways, which makes the idea of arcade with easier flight models and aiming assistance, especially in ranks VII and VIII, quite redundant. I don't mind it, if air arcade at higher tiers gets changed to realistic game engine with no shooting markers, but maybe smaller lobbies and limited number of respawns.
As a person flying a a10 i dont want it to drop br, if they do it does not need 9l
I also want high tier Air RB maps with naval targets. They keep giving us anti shipping weapons on jets and no ships to attack. And it's not like thsre isn't historical precedent, Falklands War had those engagements, Operation Praying Mantis, I'm sure there's some oveflap of shipping and aircraft on either of the Gulf Wars, etc.
Whitepill, hopefully they increase BR for strike craft like the A-10 and Su25 in GRB/GSB and leave it alone for ARB/ASB on the first pass. Ideally, they'd do an increase in both
so the T-90M will not be at 11.7 Air RB anymore?
Man I love flying my T-90 in air rb, I hope it doesn't go up.
@@Mucky_Muck me too🙌
11.7 is suitable against F-14A
@@PanzerSteinn Yes. Not really fair in dogfights tho, considering that T-90 only goes 60kmh but F14 is faster. Not easy to dogfight. Also the T-90's flight performance is not that great TBH.
@@Mucky_Muck you have armor, those AiM-9s AiM-54 won’t scratch you.
So glad they are finally fixing the Litening II resolution. It made no sense that it turns into an 8bit video game after about 8 miles
Rp bonuses delayed again? how very fun, may as well just take it off the damn list
I want 64v64 games, and some extra love for SIM Air Battles
They should just restrict loadouts to BRs. eg allow an airframe to be between 9.0 and 11.0 but if it's in a 9.0 it only gets guns, 10.0 game it can't use it's best missiles. etc.
9:00 and then later things with 12 AMRAAM's per plane...
Airfield AA is insane in RB. Had a handful of matches where people went into hiding once it was down to just them, while also having the tickets advantage.
If they have that advantage, you either flush them out or lure them in position they comfortable. Go for ground targets and ai. Also camping above not going to get them out in that position. Trust me you going to do the same if you don't care means to win a match
Yeah.. that's what you're supposed to do
I don't ever really pay attention to devblogs so pardon me probably unduly hyping it up, what's up with those 3 continuing arrows at 2:15??
I know most people here fly planes, but I really wish to see one day dynamic BR for helis.
Some of them really suffer unless you decide to play atgm sniper at 8km - let's say uninstalling hellfires modification on G-lynx dropped it's BR since you only have dumb rockets with no ccip.
The AIM-54 is FOX-3 and in game already, no?
13:36 wyvern moment
Have you played the Spitfire MkVC?
4 Hispanos at 5.0 is pretty fun
Also the worst flight performance of any fighter 😂
He doesn’t like spitfires
I hope the crew healing only happens on a cap when you crew replenish. Otherwise it’s kinda annoying to damage someone only for them to pissoff and come back fully heathy again
Still no bomber cockpits
When they dropping the Goon Strike update?
Yeah playing the A32B against SU25 and A10 pretty much ruins every game before getting any kills or even ground kills, sure maybe a skill issue as well but still, you make a good point there
6:05 wvvt fft wifff 😂
T-ttt-t TODAY JUNIOR
Babe, wake up, DEFYN posted a new video
yes
Wait a second theres an Arrow under the F14B.
F-18..?
Glad to be here early
I’m finally back to playing this game and it looks like I’m just in time🤣
WHAT ABOUT THE 2 SEATER A-10 DEFYN, CLEARLY IMPORTANT
3:50 well taht wouldnt actually be a problem if gaijin stoped focing people in ground attackers and bomber to engage in pvp.
Pefore the abismal ant ai rewards nerf a lot of people used to go only for ground units but after that the only viable way to earn rewards is to kill players.
The AI killing each other and bleeding tickets is so real. Too bad it's all pretending when gaijin says they're listening to the community feedback, they rarely listen.
Guys they leaked usa future vehicles in the one with the bonus rp you can see that the arrow goes further than f16C and f15A and goes down to a presumably new plane
Probably F-16C block 70, F-15C and the F/A-18C or F-14D
I don’t see an Earlier hornet coming because it would only have sparrows and be instantly obsolete. Also Brits might get a Canadian Hornet which would be interesting.
I think you misunderstood. The arrows are pointing to a box saying "daily bonus for researching vehicles of other nations", which implies we could use top tier aircraft to research other nation's aircrafts. And the reason they're delaying this probably is that it implies a bonus similar to premium vehicles, and we can't just give that away for free can we?
The lack of additional xp for new nations will be a big problem in the future. After a year, players will expect more and more and in 3 or 6 months some scraps will not be enough to make up for it.
FOX 3 wont change anything. Its still gonna be hugging the ground. To many jets in same place so yea. Would be interesting if they actually turn of names and you actually have to identify jets and targets on your radar. Right now its just spam radar until you lock someone, shoot. You dont even have to identify target. So changing that and requiring people to actually look at their radar might improve game.
Whats going to become of convertible RP???
I feel like the reason why they are taking so long to get the RP bonus implemented will be because of how deeply spaghetti the code is behind the scenes.
I bet that it is NOTHING like we imagine and they are currently untangling massive insanities. Or they are lying, who knows.
Remember the time you could exploit bombers by crashing and gain massive RP. They are trying to prevent that from happening again just with this bonus RP thing. Or else you could literally instant research all.
Or they're just lying. They're buying the most time they can because one day late means more people grind it inefficiently.
@@triparadox.c possible, certainly, but I find it equally likely that the database is just that bad.
16 v 16 with FOX-3 gonna be levels of madness that'll put Ace Combat multiplayer to shame lets GO
real talk tho looking forward to the BR changes. A-10 and Frogfoot aside, getting railed in Air RB while trying to grind an attacker for Ground RB CAS is just pain. I'm suffering with the MiG-27 right now... not thrilled that it sounds like the flight model is about to get even worse when I'm just trying to survive against F-15s and the like.
Why the window is looking at me?