What Are Radio Waves ?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มิ.ย. 2024
  • What are radio waves? what are electromagnetic waves?
    An explanation video on how Radio waves and Electromagnetic waves work.
    -Generation of Electric and Magnetic Fields
    -Electromagnetic Waves
    -History of James Maxwell and Henrich Hertz
    -What is Hertz
    -Frequency and wavelength of a radio wave
    -Electromagnetic Emission
    -Electromagnetic Spectrum
    -Sound waves
    -Natural Radio Waves
    -Generation of Radio Waves
    -Antenna Calculation
    -Radio Spectrum
    -Radio applications with frequency Range
    We also cover the frequency used for Radio Remote controls for Cranes.
    Frequencies used by Star link Satellites by Space X.
    If you want to know more you can go to www.anandcontrol.com
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 98

  • @stevebelcher4553
    @stevebelcher4553 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Very well done! Thank you for a good job explaining /showing the mechanics of Electromagnetic waves.

  • @Dewaniritika
    @Dewaniritika 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Searched for a lot of videos on Radio waves. This was the only one so easily explained and information ! 👍🏻

  • @gregorygoldstein7367
    @gregorygoldstein7367 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow what an excellent quick summary. You are articulate and sussinct in your teaching. I love your straight forward style. From what I have seen it is the best video on TH-cam for this topic! Thank you. Continue making other science related videos!

  • @chasityawesome
    @chasityawesome 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is EXCELLENT! You have a gift for explaining complex concepts, and made me laugh when the image of the angry lion popped up as you said, "There is a lot of the spectrum that we are not equipped to detect, because we were evolved only to not be eaten by lions which are definitely visible in the visible spectrum."
    I'm watching other videos of your as well, keep up the good work!

  • @minazuddin1706
    @minazuddin1706 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Clear cut and easily understandable!

  • @denmarpagal1481
    @denmarpagal1481 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I learned a lot. I like the way he used sources.💯

  • @mattsmartin
    @mattsmartin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Well done. Best synopsis of electro magnetic waves I have heard ..👍

    • @anandsystemsengineering9142
      @anandsystemsengineering9142  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks a lot Matthew , you made our day !

    • @R9000S
      @R9000S ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anandsystemsengineering9142 come back

  • @juliecullison1113
    @juliecullison1113 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! Thanks for this helpful, clear explanation.

  • @TishaCasida
    @TishaCasida ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well done and easy to understand - thank you! :D

  • @matthew-nt3gz
    @matthew-nt3gz ปีที่แล้ว

    Good formulas to use on how to catch a thief. Thank you

  • @siddharthchandanshive4747
    @siddharthchandanshive4747 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Easily explained video on Radio technology....Great work👍

  • @nineblackgoats
    @nineblackgoats 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "We have only evolved to not be eaten by lions, which are definitely visible in the visible spectrum."
    Now that's the kind of teaching I like

  • @uncookedr2q574
    @uncookedr2q574 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks for making this video it was very helpful👍

  • @jeffGordon852
    @jeffGordon852 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You did an amazing video!!!!!

  • @sinanakkuus
    @sinanakkuus 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great and simple explanation. thanks

  • @prafulkachhiya4152
    @prafulkachhiya4152 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤ very very yusful and nice video thanks 🙏 the great Riyal great,,,, knowledge and experience

  • @prafeenaphilendran8920
    @prafeenaphilendran8920 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done 👏 Thank you for the information. Hope to see more videos.

  • @kinshukbanerjee4587
    @kinshukbanerjee4587 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you. Very much appreciate your efforts

    • @anandsystemsengineering9142
      @anandsystemsengineering9142  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for watching and taking time out for writing the kind words. Much appreciated .

  • @azizlebeau619
    @azizlebeau619 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank for making this clear

  • @roeslan1969
    @roeslan1969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Despite the Indian accent, the contents are very clear & quite easy to follow.. Thank you...

    • @chasityawesome
      @chasityawesome 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can definitely tell he was kind enough to slow down and articulate. It helped me a lot as well!

  • @ephjaymusic
    @ephjaymusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video!!! Thank you!

  • @Poojagupta9
    @Poojagupta9 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nicely explained, thanks

  • @bosomwoko8641
    @bosomwoko8641 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks
    So Informative

  • @vinaybalani7075
    @vinaybalani7075 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very great knowledge shared regarding radio waves..!!!!

  • @mrluxgud2880
    @mrluxgud2880 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very useful, thank you

  • @illustrious1
    @illustrious1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you the excellent video.

  • @NIRANJANREDDYBODDIREDDY
    @NIRANJANREDDYBODDIREDDY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks.. Very Informative

  • @isabelyoung977
    @isabelyoung977 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely loved this video, jokes had me cracking up

  • @PatrickOfokonare
    @PatrickOfokonare 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very helpful

  • @AumCelebration
    @AumCelebration 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you 😊

  • @aniruddhpatel4174
    @aniruddhpatel4174 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very nice sir

  • @dentteach
    @dentteach ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @joelleholmes1708
    @joelleholmes1708 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great, thank you. The background noise (music) seems pointless and I find it distracting. Otherwise excellent info well presented.

  • @nickayivor8432
    @nickayivor8432 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks👍

  • @pintuyadav4166
    @pintuyadav4166 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir sun emitted electromagnetic wave, why these electromagnetic wave not produced emf in a close loop coil in a space

  • @jamesbogart
    @jamesbogart ปีที่แล้ว

    Soundwaves are not just carried by air and water as many people would think by your generality. There are also transferred by steel at many times the speed of air .

  • @biditmondal3748
    @biditmondal3748 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    well defined sir

  • @Flashylightuwu
    @Flashylightuwu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍👍👍👍 thank you

  • @dhaneshdrsingh
    @dhaneshdrsingh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @privateprivate1865
    @privateprivate1865 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do these radio waves come from?

  • @sasimadu8272
    @sasimadu8272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please tell me.are the radio waves hamful for the body

    • @anandsystemsengineering9142
      @anandsystemsengineering9142  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No radio waves are exactly like visible light but have even less energy than visible light so they are not harmful , unless you are near a very high power radio source which can definitely cause burns , the most harmful are x rays and gamma rays , whenever you take X-ray of your body it causes mutation of your DNA.

  • @abidamd9318
    @abidamd9318 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Information is super awesome but plz put the pdf

  • @elsanavarro4386
    @elsanavarro4386 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey great video , really well explained. It would have just helped to say "alternating current " instead of " AC" lost 10 minutes figuring out what that was lol

  • @manjudewani5838
    @manjudewani5838 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Grate

  • @HarpreetSingh1991
    @HarpreetSingh1991 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 0.46 , you said " when you pass a current ". Here, you did not say DC or AC current . Then again 0.57 you said, " when you pass a AC current ". So, that means you were talking about DC current at 0.46 ?

  • @maheshkumarkshirasagar3563
    @maheshkumarkshirasagar3563 ปีที่แล้ว

    But why the music of Institute of Human Anatomy??

  • @cslloyd1
    @cslloyd1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    No mention of photons? If I understand Feynman correctly, all EMR is photons and not waves. Feynman says the wave-particle duality is just due to confusion and EMR is only particles. Einstein’s Nobel prize was for proving that photons do not add amplitudes as waves would and thus the Photoelectric Effect proves light is not a wave. Yet we have AM radio (Amplitude Modulation) which Feynman would explain by saying there are MORE photons, not stronger photons nor bigger waves. So it seems to me radio signals are produced by “emergent” waves composed of a shower of photons and that the “color” of the photons that make up the shower is immaterial.
    Do I misunderstand Feynman and Einstein or are they just wrong?

  • @timwhaley8810
    @timwhaley8810 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the smartest man I ever heard. And you have an exquisite and beautiful talent to explain the complex where it is understandable (at least somewhat to a guy like me).
    Thank you profoundly!!!❤️❤️❤️

  • @timwhaley8810
    @timwhaley8810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m bought a crypto called theta. And I realize that really no one understands what they’re talking about!! I’m trying to write a paper to get into a PhD program for Health and Human Performance and I chose to write about theta because I like it, might make me wealthy, and I love learning!!! I keep going back, and back, and back...I’m fairly certain I will be reading the Bible, the Bhagavad Gita, or listening to Beethoven next.
    Thanks again.

    • @chasityawesome
      @chasityawesome 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I just read Bhagavad Gita and loved it! The Tao is similar. You'd like the Kyballion I bet!! The Bible still amazes me, as it transforms its meaning over time to be exactly what I need at any particular time in my life. Truly "The Living Word."

    • @christofferrasmussen
      @christofferrasmussen ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@chasityawesome are you tripping bro..... you sound high as fuc-

  • @sriyai
    @sriyai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙋‍♂

  • @HarpreetSingh1991
    @HarpreetSingh1991 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 0:46 , you said " when you pass a current through a wire". Here, you did not say DC or AC current . Then again 0:57 you said, " when you pass an AC current through a wire". So, that means you were talking about DC current at 0:46 ?

  • @arnokosterman231
    @arnokosterman231 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice one the imige of magneticle feilds flow .
    I wonder if it is olso consition the behaviure of the particle feild fllow and there behaviure of core colapses of particles to produse thise waves😍
    Like in cosmos we see polar switsh inside the black hole.(innercore)
    But do to the phisicle stuck in position we have vemale pull a litle harder we have counterfeildflow we have male and pull a lotle more harder we have maly femal(look to the angle of the beaks.
    They are the resemblend of the stuck switsh and the thentional pull and releas for the manivesting exsteems of thention diverentional in a stuck position😍🛸💜
    But you see the feilds going outwarts equatorial same as the planet eurth.
    And not a plus and min in the poars boths are going inwards😍 on the demand of eurths magnetude of feilds in motion
    (🌀>🌐>>)
    Lool the the { { than you olso understand whay the woble exists has noting to do with planets oldo they go hand in hand with the event they are part of the evend🌈
    If you don't understand masser the combas neadle .
    A compas neadle with the magneticle going in on one side and going out on the other side is a broken compas neadle and will olwaays dance do to the South arow is bending away from south.
    And north arow is pulling in to north.
    4 jears i have shown manny thinks to show and jad it still is not added bi the pressend commen science👀 whay??¿
    Every one can do it at how to see if polars realy are plus and min.
    I understood it from selfsustaineble plasma of creation its space and motion and magnetude ophone itself.
    To manivest the presentation of the furts particle of existance.
    I made neadles with to of the same directions of magnetice motion towart the midle of the neadle
    Manny times to show til mi blond hears became like hu wat em i doin i can olso masher the compas neadle wit mlamps as it masssures direction of feildflow.
    So i put one in the midle and the other on its thurn on bothes ends😍
    And 🤣😋🤣 jeb boths are counting in plus and when i swiths the penns in the midle and do the same boths are countin in the min😍
    Actualy wat i see here is whay old lightbold are able to give light.
    Not thermodinamics.of elextrons pushing trou.
    But exileteretet particles to reseave and schink to release and grow.
    And with it there colective cosmos expands and scrinks😍
    For our aminos of the eye there free plasma to interact ophone it for us to see light🌈
    Bit this becomes understandeble if we walk away from plus and min🙏
    Thention diverentional😍🙏🌈

    • @arnokosterman231
      @arnokosterman231 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thention diverentional is equal to the intention of the thention diverentional.
      Bevore space time of this structure and bevore there colective coherence towart ther princeple (the soul of the cluster totalety)😍

    • @arnokosterman231
      @arnokosterman231 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm going to watch further .
      Oei oei oei i love the imigery💟🙏❤

    • @arnokosterman231
      @arnokosterman231 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jeb i liked it ferry match .💜
      thank you for your surves of contribution 🙏
      Wish you and oll match love and joy💟🙏❤🌈🍀

  • @mobiletechnicallaser2652
    @mobiletechnicallaser2652 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wave ko kese dekhege

    • @anandsystemsengineering9142
      @anandsystemsengineering9142  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dear Mobile Technicallaser , We cannot see radio waves with Human eyes , we can detect radio waves with spectrum analyzer or you can use antenna , For Detection of X-Rays you can use Geiger Counter & For Infrared Light you can use Infrared camera .

  • @gitanjalipuri3824
    @gitanjalipuri3824 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Kori wave plots

  • @naisijoy
    @naisijoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We have only evolved to not be eaten by a lion which is in the visible spectrum. Haha that got me

  • @noorulhaq2329
    @noorulhaq2329 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks but it was better if video would in urdu.

  • @Proboiz181
    @Proboiz181 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir

  • @kailashchandramali2504
    @kailashchandramali2504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Kabhi hindi language me bhi bataye

  • @mateah83
    @mateah83 ปีที่แล้ว

    But WHAT are the waves made of? What IS the wave? And plz don't just answer "it's a magnetic field" and what is the magnetic field then? If it's some particle involved please name that particle but if no particle is involved then please explain if these waves are made of nothing or something?

    • @anandsystemsengineering9142
      @anandsystemsengineering9142  ปีที่แล้ว

      These waves are nothing but just light waves, yes particles are involved but these are mass less particles called photons , these photons have energy , now depends on your research how deep you want to go .

    • @mateah83
      @mateah83 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anandsystemsengineering9142 I'm trying to approach this from a logical point of view and I suddenly realised that to be able to make any kind of claim that suggests that I have some sort of basic understanding of what a photon is I literally have to accept something so proposterous (that photons are both mass/energy/particles and at the same time they're massless, zero energy nonexistent waves) that it just doesn't make any god damn sense.
      If this was biology instead of quantum physics I'd be asked to accept that there is a creature in the animal kingdom that is a mammal, it has 4 feet and weighs 100kg and it doesn't exist and no one has ever seen it. We have mapped their habitat we know where evey single one of them lives, we have tagged every one of them with a ear tag, and of course this animal has never existed and no one has ever heard of it.
      I mean how would you even start to grapple with this idea? So I have another question.
      Could it be that physicists have simply just missed to understand something fundamental and instead of realizing this blunder they are instead 100% sure that they have the right understanding and since it can't be their astronomical blunder it has to be the fact that these "photons" are ghosts, and they're real, they exist, they don't exist, sometimes they both exist and don't exist at the exact same time, it's whatever really. Could this possibly be the case? That there's a major blunder? Hope I make sense English isn't my first language. Peace

    • @mateah83
      @mateah83 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anandsystemsengineering9142 And thank you for your reply, Idk if I made sense in the last post so let me clarify. Just so you know what my lever understanding is I'm 40yo average intelligence and have always been low key interested in these things. I read about the double slut experiment probably 20 years ago, I have also read about the fallacies involved when non physicists attempt to convey the "mystery" from a very limited understanding. I get that it's complex, and I get that physicists are certain they have the right understanding since they can predict how photons will behave.
      Let's assume that ghosts are real, I mean the spirits of dead people. Imagine if they were so frequently manifested that they could be studied to the point of living humans being able to predict where a ghost will appear and when. But just because a scientist can use mathematics to accurately predict where a ghost will appear is NOT synonymous in ANY WAY with "understanding what ghosts are" would you agree?
      Perhaps physicists have ZERO clue about what electromagnetic radiation is and the only thing they actually know is how to mathematically predict and categorize different types of radiation. I hope I don't sound very stupid now hehe.
      A caveman that lived 40.000 years age could very well have been fully aware of the connection between dark clouds and rainfall, to the point of him being able to predict if its gonna rain or not with 100% accuracy, but does that mean that he understands the liquid and gas state of water and how humidity and temperature and pressure plays a roll? Hardly. So being able to predict something with great accuracy means nothing really (in this sense, not in every sense of evey thing of course) would you agree? How deep is the physicists understanding of what subatomic "particles" are or aren't?

    • @anandsystemsengineering9142
      @anandsystemsengineering9142  ปีที่แล้ว

      No it cannot be a blunder , these photos which are massless are used by plants for photosynthesis

    • @mateah83
      @mateah83 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anandsystemsengineering9142Doesn't sound like they're "massless" if you read their wiki page, you'll find terms such as "angular momentum of the photon" "high energy photons" you'll even find equations for calculating mass. And of course you'll also find lots of sentences that say "since the photon is massless...."
      Now this is what I'm talking about, it's a 4 legged ghost that is a mammal and a fish and doesn't even exist, hasn't ever even been conceptualized actually 🐠
      Okay, if I use my average intelligence I'd say that everything that moves at the speed of light can not:
      1 Be a particle
      2 Have mass
      3 Have angular momentum
      4 Consist of high energy
      But then again I guess you have to have really high intelligence to understand these things, it's not like you can rely on math and logic. 99.99999% of all physics seems to be calculating 'probabilities' and then inventing a thousand new theoretical "concepts" in an attempt to explain weird phenomena. I'm not saying I don't believe in science obviously I do, but it's not like I automatically assume that there's 0% chance that smart educated people can be wrong even about fundamental stuff in their profession. History teaches us that in 50 or 100 years we'll probably cringe or laugh about most of the theories we're 100% sure of today. No? 😂

  • @srikanthncsrikanth2958
    @srikanthncsrikanth2958 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you