ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ค. 2018
- Moritz Moszkowski - Symphony in D minor (1873)
First complete performance in February 1875, in the same concert as the op. 3 Piano Concerto. Haven't performed since.
0:11 I. Moderato - Allegro Appassionato - Piu mosso
13:51 II. Scherzo: Vivo
21:52 III. Larghetto
29:51 IV. Finale: Presto non tanto - Piu mosso
------------------
Manuscript from the Bibliothèque nationale de France
------------------
Many thanks to the UnsungComposers forum!
Computer performance using the NotePerformer VST
------------------
Support this channel!: ko-fi.com/imwaldevesteel - เพลง
Moszkowski is a strange case. He has been Radio 3's composer of the week, one of his Spanish dances is popular, his E major piano concerto is played and recorded more and more, there was considerable excitement when his 1st piano concerto was discovered ... yet this Symphony ...... Fabulous job by the way.
a beautiful symphony with plenty of musical colours should be performed at the Proms next year 2019 in London!
Your work is very much appreciated. I have been dying to hear this symphony for ages now. Thank you so much!
Bravo bravo bravo music symphony super
Reminiscences of Schumann. Work of youth. The author was 19 years old when composed it. Interesting music.
Schade, dass niemand diese schöne Sinfonie gespielt hat.
ShorkGamer we are working on it!
Who, when? :O Can't wait!
@@erlendlangseth4672 *cough* Toccata *cough*
@@bomcabedal Huh?
@@erlendlangseth4672 Toccata has recently released a recording of Moszkowski's other "symphony", Joanna d'Arc. One would expect them to take care of his one, too.
Thank you so much !! This is a great work ~~
Username checks out.
Im Walde is the new Tomekkobialka.
The 4th movement's start shock the cramped out of me.
how to read that word on timpani in 18:17 ??
Very interesting. The script seems to have many corrections by author. Maybe you could extract alternate version from it too :D The wirting has somewhat typical Moszkowski'isms. Witty, full of surprises...
The finale is fire
There is also an unrecorded Johanna d'Arc (Joan of Arc) Symphony Op.19 of 1875-76
It has been recorded very recently actually naxosdirect.com/items/moszkowski-orchestral-music-vol.-1-johanna-darc-507155
@@ImWalde Glad of that - nice rendition of this d minor one.
@@j.maybrick8596 and they promise there's more to come!!! ;)
"This is the first of a series of Ian Hobson recordings for Toccata Classics that will focus on Moszkowski’s piano and orchestral music."
quel est l'orchestre et le maestro ?
C'est MIDI.
😂😂😂
Fantastic discovery, but rather a lot of transcription errors from the Ms.
Hasn’t been performed since 1875!? Are you fucking serious!??? College orchestras should be all over this shit by now...
noise
It is that way simply beacause of mistakes made by the transcriber. It is not performed by any orchestra but by a computer programme.
I transcribed the first and third movements for this audio recording. A fair bunch of mistakes were made by me, and quite a few resulting from inadequate .xml transfers between two notation software. Sorry for all that. But the manuscript itself is not without many errors, really, either. It's frustratingly ambiguous sometimes.
It will be a real challenge for any editor to get a performing edition out of this work, but I wholeheartedly say it'll be worth it.
Haha I just found this comment, when I said 'noise' it was just a really stupid way of saying nice. I was clearly not thinking.
@@austinworkman9967 I was gonna say "more like noice" but it seems that has been taken care of lmao
Moritz Moszkowski was a composer for virtuosi pianists but not a virtuoso composer. His music lacks of creativity and melodic beauty, it sounds like a sequence of classic and romantic "déjà vu", rhythmic figures without originality and an abhorrence orchestration. When we think that in 1875 we already knew the great works of Wagner, Chopin, Verdi, Brahms, Franck, Grieg etc., we can understand why this symphony has remained unperformed since then!
Are you mad?
To each his own, and all that, and most of Brahms' well-known stuff is post-1875 by the way. But regardless whether you like this work or not, there is undeniable skill present (some irregularities in the middle of the first movement are the result of errors in Noteperformer, by the way, not due to Moszkowski's writing).
Of course, all of that has nothing to do with this work's fate. In the 19th century, getting a second performance was notoriously difficult, and most works were heard only once. There is a misunderstanding that "history has sorted out the weed from the chaff" in music (a sort of circular reasoning, anyhow). Nothing could be further from the truth: the selection of the musical canon has mainly been the result of contingencies and collusion. Not everything heard in music halls these days is brilliant _because_ of it.
You are if not mad, certainly tone deaf.
@@andre1214g Where did that judgement originate? Such a childish response from a stranger.
His piano concerto in E is work of virtuosic composer. His chamber works are also surprisingly excellent.