The fact that she kept his letter and posted in by her workstation is one of the most wholesome things about this scene. People in jobs like this rarely, if ever, receive any words of encouragement or appreciation, and the fact that she kept this shows how much Adrian's words meant to her.
Can we all take a moment to appreciate the fact that Monk saved a young boy from a life in prison, exposed a corrupt member of law enforcement and got a millionaire fashion show owner locked up for murder all out of him noticing that his shirt wasn't inspected properly.
@@kencarraher35 Complimenting the writing on a TV show means I don't have a life? Well, best make sure you don't say anything good about any movies or TV then. Wouldn't want people to think you don't have a life. 😂
It’s great how proud Monk is of how smart the Captain is when he’s drunk. He could’ve just settled with him thinking that he was as smart as him, but he chose to point out that he’s smart*er* than him
“Mr. Monk Goes to a Fashion Show” is one of my favorite episodes because of how happy the ending is with Maria getting her son back and how funny it is with how Randy and Natalie are when trying to be more fashionable.😊😂❤ I also love that it became a recurring thing that Stottlemeyer figures out a key clue/solve when he’s drinking.😂😅
stottlemeyer's first reaction to monk helping on the "suicide case" wasn't to think that he wasn't needed or there wasn't anything wrong... but straight to worrying that they might have missed something that monk would point out like it was obvious...😂
It's not that consistent. A lot of times in the early part of the series he was perfectly happy to get Monk involved, and conversely unhappy later on whenever he realized he would have to cater to Monk's special needs. In this one he's a bit hostile because he'd already reached a conclusion before Monk arrived, but he's also okay with it being overturned.
In the Vegas one, they left out an important detail. When the scarf got caught and nearly strangled Monk, he realized that he was unable to scream. But Mrs. Thorn was heard screaming before she got killed. But if she was being strangled by her scarf, how could she have screamed?
She could have simply removed it from his kneck. It's was literally loosely thrown around the kneck! They have much more easily simply and quickly removed it.
I was not impressed how they ever thought that was a good idea. Having a scarf that long and wrapped tightly around your neck is a bad idea in general, but especially if you are investigating how it killed someone.
It actually shows that he is as inelegant, but when drunk more relaxed and more capable of being observant. Edit: same with Randy, he is a doofus, but really good at his job when calm and collected and not trying to be competitive.
These are some of my favorite solves, however I’m surprised you didn’t include the episode where the playboy kills someone by pinning him underneath a barbell with a large magnet.
15:35 -- Monk is wrong about the "whoever/whomever." The note begins, "To whomever." The word "to" is a preposition here, with "whomever" being the object of the preposition, and thus in the objective case: whomever. The writers flubbed and NOBODY caught it.
@@MB-dg3lr Well, the writing of the script is the writers' job, and their job is presumably a huge part of their lives. So I am actually talking about that life that you say they have.
@@invertedexistence Tell that to Monk. He would not find this grammatical error acceptable. But what really makes it egregious is that it is supposed to be a correction of someone else's grammar. THE WHOLE POINT of that piece of dialogue is that Monk's very special peculiarities make him notice a minor grammatical mistake. BUT IT'S NOT A MISTAKE. Which makes Monk sound like an idiot instead of a savant.
Yes, thank you! The word who is used as the subject of a sentence whilst whom is used as the object. "Who is that?" "That is Mary." "To whom did you speak about the changes?" "I spoke to John."
Doesn't matter, counting cards isn't cheating, casinos can and will eject you if they think you are doing it but Monk's winnings to that point are legally his.
Turns out Natalie was right. There WAS someone in the ceiling. And kind of funny that the captain is as smart as Monk when he's drunk. Although he's been smart without being drunk too.
Fun fact: If you pause the video exactly at the 0:14 mark you’ll notice the last paragraph of the letter that starts with “Your job aptitude…” has a typo in the second line. It has a capital E on the word every. Which is an error Monk would never make…
Not if, as shown during the "how it happened" moment, he struck her from behind hard enough to knock her out or kill her instantly before she had a chance to react. You can't struggle if you're unconscious or dead. Without defensive wounds (such as bruises on the knuckles, or skin beneath the fingernails) any injury could reasonably be assumed to have been a result of the fall.
it is to whomever ... not to whoever... the note says "to whomever i may have hurt" meaning the person known or unknown who received the hurt. If the pronoun is functioning as the subject, meaning it is performing the verb, use “to whoever”. whoever stole my yoghurt If the pronoun is functioning as the object, meaning it is the recipient of the verb or the object of the preposition, use “to whomever” . to whomever i hit. receiving the action... SO Monk is wrong, the note is written correctly the whomever receives the hurt from the writer of the note.
@@heartrose6088 my point was Monk's writer misquoted the rule for who/whom stating that an English teacher would get it correct and in the note it was correct.
This was a fantastic show for a few seasons, but then they jumped the shark and Monk became increasingly whacko. The early years with Bitty Schram were great. I also enjoyed Traylor Howard's performance, though she came along as the show was starting to trend downward. Just my two cents...
As careful about details as they were, you'd think they could have written a better letter to "#8" instead of just repeating most of paragraph 1 for paragraph 2.
The fact that she kept his letter and posted in by her workstation is one of the most wholesome things about this scene. People in jobs like this rarely, if ever, receive any words of encouragement or appreciation, and the fact that she kept this shows how much Adrian's words meant to her.
😮😢 ?
,,
How sweet 😢
Can we all take a moment to appreciate the fact that Monk saved a young boy from a life in prison, exposed a corrupt member of law enforcement and got a millionaire fashion show owner locked up for murder all out of him noticing that his shirt wasn't inspected properly.
😂😂😂
Go ahead be bold appreciate it all by yourself
It's a TV show get a life
@@kencarraher35 it's just a comment on TH-cam get a life
@@kencarraher35 Complimenting the writing on a TV show means I don't have a life? Well, best make sure you don't say anything good about any movies or TV then. Wouldn't want people to think you don't have a life. 😂
It’s great how proud Monk is of how smart the Captain is when he’s drunk. He could’ve just settled with him thinking that he was as smart as him, but he chose to point out that he’s smart*er* than him
My favorite solve in the entire series.
“Mr. Monk Goes to a Fashion Show” is one of my favorite episodes because of how happy the ending is with Maria getting her son back and how funny it is with how Randy and Natalie are when trying to be more fashionable.😊😂❤
I also love that it became a recurring thing that Stottlemeyer figures out a key clue/solve when he’s drinking.😂😅
When did Stottlemeyer drinking to solve cases recur?
@@encycl07pedia-Mr monk is up all night
@@encycl07pedia-and in “Mr. Monk goes to Vegas”
@@natsi4748 That was the first time.
Randy did look good when he improved his fashion 😂
Monk can be very kind, the letter was adorable.
Little upsetting that the second half just repeats parts of the first.
@@FrankandRaul yeah, but overall, that act was touching.
He’s actually caring. He’s just sick. Him and Ambrose.
The humor in this series is such a treat.
stottlemeyer's first reaction to monk helping on the "suicide case" wasn't to think that he wasn't needed or there wasn't anything wrong... but straight to worrying that they might have missed something that monk would point out like it was obvious...😂
Like the letter he wrote to inspector #8:)LOl "Sharona was always the victim when we re-enacted" "I'm sure that's why she quit"
You can tell the school one is from an earlier season by how weirdly hostile Stottlemeyer is to having Monk involved at all.
It's not that consistent. A lot of times in the early part of the series he was perfectly happy to get Monk involved, and conversely unhappy later on whenever he realized he would have to cater to Monk's special needs. In this one he's a bit hostile because he'd already reached a conclusion before Monk arrived, but he's also okay with it being overturned.
YES. I hate the first few seasons because of how mean Stottlemeyer is to him. They’re better as mismatched friends
In the Vegas one, they left out an important detail. When the scarf got caught and nearly strangled Monk, he realized that he was unable to scream. But Mrs. Thorn was heard screaming before she got killed. But if she was being strangled by her scarf, how could she have screamed?
"Don't change anything!" Here, here Mr. Monk
Love watching monk again and again.
Very impressed with how quickly Natalie goes for the knife when Monk is being choked by the scarf.
She is a badass
That's why I prefer Natalie over Sharona every time
She could have simply removed it from his kneck. It's was literally loosely thrown around the kneck! They have much more easily simply and quickly removed it.
I think it was being pulled too tightly, no give.@@sackettfamily4685
I was not impressed how they ever thought that was a good idea. Having a scarf that long and wrapped tightly around your neck is a bad idea in general, but especially if you are investigating how it killed someone.
Randy, the correct way to refer to Trudy is: Monk's late wife.
11:45 Poor Stottlemeyer doesn't know how to take the news that he's as smart as Monk when drunk.
It actually shows that he is as inelegant, but when drunk more relaxed and more capable of being observant.
Edit: same with Randy, he is a doofus, but really good at his job when calm and collected and not trying to be competitive.
Well he is less angry and annoyed. 😂
I love how Monk doesn’t get defensive about it. He always actively praises the accomplishments of others
remember he can't recall being the Bomb at karaoke .he's retracing his steps they give him the trophy for best karaoke he leaves it behind .
Can’t wait for the movie!!
Well, don't keep us in suspense, how did you like it?
When Monk says to Leland "Smarter" than him when drunk I lamost cried...
Andy? I think you mean leland bud
@@chrisramos3454 thanks. Corrected
Somehow the criminals always ended up saying more than they meant to, especially in front of Monk.
These are some of my favorite solves, however I’m surprised you didn’t include the episode where the playboy kills someone by pinning him underneath a barbell with a large magnet.
Here’s what happened
You all thought you could get away with your crimes regardless of the motive.
But he still gets them and puts them away.
I like when Stottlemeyer says I'm the smartest here and monk says "Smarter!" and Stottlemeyer has a look like, "That wasn't a very smart thing to say"
He didn't say I'm the smartest here, he said I'm as smart as you.
Nah.. it's the realization that he's smarter than Monk when he's drunk as hell..
I love this series ❤
17:58 of all the cases monk did you however sicken me the most.
Monk is so good he can raise his bets without getting backed off.
15:35 -- Monk is wrong about the "whoever/whomever."
The note begins, "To whomever." The word "to" is a preposition here, with "whomever" being the object of the preposition, and thus in the objective case: whomever.
The writers flubbed and NOBODY caught it.
Cos they have a life
@@MB-dg3lr Well, the writing of the script is the writers' job, and their job is presumably a huge part of their lives. So I am actually talking about that life that you say they have.
@@invertedexistence Tell that to Monk. He would not find this grammatical error acceptable.
But what really makes it egregious is that it is supposed to be a correction of someone else's grammar.
THE WHOLE POINT of that piece of dialogue is that Monk's very special peculiarities make him notice a minor grammatical mistake. BUT IT'S NOT A MISTAKE. Which makes Monk sound like an idiot instead of a savant.
Yes, thank you!
The word who is used as the subject of a sentence whilst whom is used as the object.
"Who is that?"
"That is Mary."
"To whom did you speak about the changes?"
"I spoke to John."
@@TH-camallowedmynametobestolen Boy I really hope someone got fired for that blunder
I’m shocked that the astronaut one wasn’t included!
10:35 - I'd respond like the casino owner "Where's your proof"?
Doesn't matter, counting cards isn't cheating, casinos can and will eject you if they think you are doing it but Monk's winnings to that point are legally his.
The old guy at the beginning of the second clip. Wasn't he in an episode of Law and Order?
Where is the scene with the Captain singing Karaoke..?!!
10:37 monk got the right idea but captain solved the case
The Cabin Fever episode was ridiculous
Amazing
Don't change anything 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I really enjoy Stottelmeyer. He is a great character, and Ted Levine should change his name. He IS Stottelmeyer. And love the show.
it puts the lotion in the bucket
مسلسل رائع يجسد فيه شخصية المحقق مونك كمحقق وكأنسان وتعقيدات حالته النفسية بسبب وفاة زوجته
Turns out Natalie was right. There WAS someone in the ceiling. And kind of funny that the captain is as smart as Monk when he's drunk. Although he's been smart without being drunk too.
QED: Thus it is proved.
Why does it freeze
I miss Sharona
Fun fact: If you pause the video exactly at the 0:14 mark you’ll notice the last paragraph of the letter that starts with “Your job aptitude…” has a typo in the second line. It has a capital E on the word every. Which is an error Monk would never make…
It's the start of a new sentence. The bigger issue is that both paragraphs are exactly the same, just copied over.
Counting cards isn't cheating if they didn't pay him they'd lose their gaming licence.
I hate that Monk is not available on Netflix or Amazon in the PH. Anyone know where I can stream it?
netflix
It’s on Netflix
With the last one wouldn't there be prints and fibres on the clock hand? Possibly dust on her clothes from the machine room?
Yes it might. But that would merely indicate where her body was disposed of, not who killed her.
What about the astronaut solve?
Wouldnt an autopsy of the english teacher show signs of a struggle?
Not if, as shown during the "how it happened" moment, he struck her from behind hard enough to knock her out or kill her instantly before she had a chance to react. You can't struggle if you're unconscious or dead. Without defensive wounds (such as bruises on the knuckles, or skin beneath the fingernails) any injury could reasonably be assumed to have been a result of the fall.
It's "whomever".
Yep😅oops!
if Pablo is already in jail, how can the hair belong to him?
Killing and switching bodies in under 2min? 😂😂😂
"Solve" isn't a noun.
❤❤❤
Andrew McCarthy. Took me a minute.
I prefer Natalie. She better complements Monk.
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
lets go
it is to whomever ... not to whoever...
the note says "to whomever i may have hurt" meaning the person known or unknown who received the hurt.
If the pronoun is functioning as the subject, meaning it is performing the verb, use “to whoever”. whoever stole my yoghurt
If the pronoun is functioning as the object, meaning it is the recipient of the verb or the object of the preposition, use “to whomever” . to whomever i hit. receiving the action...
SO Monk is wrong, the note is written correctly the whomever receives the hurt from the writer of the note.
It’s not that deep and he still caught the killer
@@heartrose6088 my point was Monk's writer misquoted the rule for who/whom stating that an English teacher would get it correct and in the note it was correct.
This was a fantastic show for a few seasons, but then they jumped the shark and Monk became increasingly whacko. The early years with Bitty Schram were great. I also enjoyed Traylor Howard's performance, though she came along as the show was starting to trend downward. Just my two cents...
As careful about details as they were, you'd think they could have written a better letter to "#8" instead of just repeating most of paragraph 1 for paragraph 2.
It fit’s actually.. considering how monk is he repeated the important things it was definitely designed that way on purpose
This guy has no charishma.